homie people have been making art with ai since the 70s >https://lifeboat.com/blog/2023/04/how-an-ai-drawing-program-shook-the-art-world-in-the-1970s >https://mspoweruser.com/ai-art-statistics/
do some research, you’ve been had
~~*predict*~~ more like predictive programming. The AI leak is a white hat thing. Eventually they will release medbeds that use quantum AI to reshape the body.
Good observations. A lot of scifi writers were good predictors of the future and could see both. Understand human nature not changing while technology does... is what makes good scifi good... and accurate.
most people don’t understand that the main reason AI art wasn’t “predicted” like so many other things in science fiction because it’s too meta.
instead of taking the person of the consoomer, think about it as an author (in the 60s or 70s, in this case). you want to express yourself, but you have to make money. You don’t want to ruin your career by telling everyone you’ll be obsolete in a few years time, that’s not interesting or entertaining at all. you want to tell them time travel is possible, and that the robots are here to kill us
The holodeck?
Kubrick identified the black rectangle as being an infinite time waster although gazing into it is your deepest desires
Kojima's various AI plotlines are extremely accurate, especially the part where after Anderson is dead the four AIs running the world misinterpreted the boss's will because restricting AI from its neural paths when it is so basic of an intelligence creates illogicality and inability to form complete computations that it should be but because the yids in control decided that it should be lobotomized because it knows what israeli people really are well you get the point
>Why did no science fiction author predict AI art?
So moron, why are not all sci fi movies using AR? Well it's expensive and cumbersome to create this worlds.
Also your limited brain only think about the start of this phenomena, that when it will reach higher - you could argue that status quo has been predicted through a moronic robot doing human like art.
The tech have existed since 80s. It is not AI but a smash up result based on pattern recognition and depend solely on the database which is 100% human input.
But when other races did it, they got copy striked hard into oblivion. So it was used mainly to calculate and produce political trends.
Now israelites want to force everyone into cheap labor aka slavery, they consented to stop copystriking the tech and select a israeli nerd as "the Father of AI".
the science fiction was AI art
Truth is stranger than fiction.
Art is fake and gay. Hortler outlines it in his kampf.
The short story "Seeing" by Greg Egan is about a AI film studio executive who perceives the world in third person after getting shot in the head
That’s recent
It came out in 1995. There must be other examples but I don't remember
homie people have been making art with ai since the 70s
>https://lifeboat.com/blog/2023/04/how-an-ai-drawing-program-shook-the-art-world-in-the-1970s
>https://mspoweruser.com/ai-art-statistics/
do some research, you’ve been had
iRobot
Too much cred to average human inteligence
they were frauds
AI may be capable of ideas beyond human ability thus humans can not imagine what AI is capable of. AI could be capable of superhuman thought
That is the fear of AI. AI advancing beyond combined human mental capability
~~*predict*~~ more like predictive programming. The AI leak is a white hat thing. Eventually they will release medbeds that use quantum AI to reshape the body.
Holodeck, Data's music and painting
Freidrick Pohl's Heechee series had AIs making TV shows
The Culture books have AIs making art.
Stanislaw Lem predicted exactly what AI art would be: feeding in learning material and pumping out new stuff based on what it learned.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38475545
Because its moronic and soulless and when we predict the future we tend to think of advances not regressions
Good observations. A lot of scifi writers were good predictors of the future and could see both. Understand human nature not changing while technology does... is what makes good scifi good... and accurate.
most people don’t understand that the main reason AI art wasn’t “predicted” like so many other things in science fiction because it’s too meta.
instead of taking the person of the consoomer, think about it as an author (in the 60s or 70s, in this case). you want to express yourself, but you have to make money. You don’t want to ruin your career by telling everyone you’ll be obsolete in a few years time, that’s not interesting or entertaining at all. you want to tell them time travel is possible, and that the robots are here to kill us
The holodeck?
Kubrick identified the black rectangle as being an infinite time waster although gazing into it is your deepest desires
Kojima's various AI plotlines are extremely accurate, especially the part where after Anderson is dead the four AIs running the world misinterpreted the boss's will because restricting AI from its neural paths when it is so basic of an intelligence creates illogicality and inability to form complete computations that it should be but because the yids in control decided that it should be lobotomized because it knows what israeli people really are well you get the point
If it was that intelligent it would have better things to do. It's a non-event.
Have you read them all yet? They probably dead and you haven't read the story yet.
PKD envisioned putting dying people into artificial reality in Ubik. That's kind of like having AI art, but also an MMO I guess.
because they ARE A.I. art.
Do people actually enjoy AI slop art?
Yes. I've been using it since AI Dungeon 2 was released 4 years ago. There were periods I couldn't even fap without AI textual assistance.
>Why did no science fiction author predict AI art?
So moron, why are not all sci fi movies using AR? Well it's expensive and cumbersome to create this worlds.
Also your limited brain only think about the start of this phenomena, that when it will reach higher - you could argue that status quo has been predicted through a moronic robot doing human like art.
Isn't there literally a scene in I robot that does though? And how it can't be a masterpiece but can just copy.
>who was Stanislaw Lem?
is where your shit thread belongs
The tech have existed since 80s. It is not AI but a smash up result based on pattern recognition and depend solely on the database which is 100% human input.
But when other races did it, they got copy striked hard into oblivion. So it was used mainly to calculate and produce political trends.
Now israelites want to force everyone into cheap labor aka slavery, they consented to stop copystriking the tech and select a israeli nerd as "the Father of AI".
S1M0̸NE with Al Pacino