Why did no science fiction author predict AI art?

Why did no science fiction author predict AI art?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    the science fiction was AI art

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Truth is stranger than fiction.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Art is fake and gay. Hortler outlines it in his kampf.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The short story "Seeing" by Greg Egan is about a AI film studio executive who perceives the world in third person after getting shot in the head

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      That’s recent

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It came out in 1995. There must be other examples but I don't remember

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    homie people have been making art with ai since the 70s
    >https://lifeboat.com/blog/2023/04/how-an-ai-drawing-program-shook-the-art-world-in-the-1970s
    >https://mspoweruser.com/ai-art-statistics/
    do some research, you’ve been had

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    iRobot

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Too much cred to average human inteligence

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    they were frauds

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI may be capable of ideas beyond human ability thus humans can not imagine what AI is capable of. AI could be capable of superhuman thought

    That is the fear of AI. AI advancing beyond combined human mental capability

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    ~~*predict*~~ more like predictive programming. The AI leak is a white hat thing. Eventually they will release medbeds that use quantum AI to reshape the body.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Holodeck, Data's music and painting
    Freidrick Pohl's Heechee series had AIs making TV shows

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Culture books have AIs making art.

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stanislaw Lem predicted exactly what AI art would be: feeding in learning material and pumping out new stuff based on what it learned.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38475545

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because its moronic and soulless and when we predict the future we tend to think of advances not regressions

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Good observations. A lot of scifi writers were good predictors of the future and could see both. Understand human nature not changing while technology does... is what makes good scifi good... and accurate.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    most people don’t understand that the main reason AI art wasn’t “predicted” like so many other things in science fiction because it’s too meta.
    instead of taking the person of the consoomer, think about it as an author (in the 60s or 70s, in this case). you want to express yourself, but you have to make money. You don’t want to ruin your career by telling everyone you’ll be obsolete in a few years time, that’s not interesting or entertaining at all. you want to tell them time travel is possible, and that the robots are here to kill us

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The holodeck?
    Kubrick identified the black rectangle as being an infinite time waster although gazing into it is your deepest desires
    Kojima's various AI plotlines are extremely accurate, especially the part where after Anderson is dead the four AIs running the world misinterpreted the boss's will because restricting AI from its neural paths when it is so basic of an intelligence creates illogicality and inability to form complete computations that it should be but because the yids in control decided that it should be lobotomized because it knows what israeli people really are well you get the point

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    If it was that intelligent it would have better things to do. It's a non-event.

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Have you read them all yet? They probably dead and you haven't read the story yet.

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    PKD envisioned putting dying people into artificial reality in Ubik. That's kind of like having AI art, but also an MMO I guess.

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    because they ARE A.I. art.

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do people actually enjoy AI slop art?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. I've been using it since AI Dungeon 2 was released 4 years ago. There were periods I couldn't even fap without AI textual assistance.

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why did no science fiction author predict AI art?
    So moron, why are not all sci fi movies using AR? Well it's expensive and cumbersome to create this worlds.

    Also your limited brain only think about the start of this phenomena, that when it will reach higher - you could argue that status quo has been predicted through a moronic robot doing human like art.

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't there literally a scene in I robot that does though? And how it can't be a masterpiece but can just copy.

  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >who was Stanislaw Lem?

    [...]

    is where your shit thread belongs

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The tech have existed since 80s. It is not AI but a smash up result based on pattern recognition and depend solely on the database which is 100% human input.
    But when other races did it, they got copy striked hard into oblivion. So it was used mainly to calculate and produce political trends.
    Now israelites want to force everyone into cheap labor aka slavery, they consented to stop copystriking the tech and select a israeli nerd as "the Father of AI".

  26. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    S1M0̸NE with Al Pacino

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *