What else will AI make obsolete?

Man "artists" are coping hard about ai art. I remember when digital art got big, traditionalists were upset and people collectively mocked them into silence.
Now those digital artists are threatened by new technology.

An artist of the future will be someone will a powerful AI, digital photo manipulation skill via photos hop to do touch ups and that's just fact.
Why cope?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My gf

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      underrated comment

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Muh gf
      Soz bro. Thats a man

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Digital imagery
    Photography
    News reports
    Movie scripts
    Movie scenes (auto-cgi)
    auto-generated skits and animated kids programs (we're already here)
    The destruction of the internet as no man will be able to use the turing test to distinguish a fellow man from a bot
    auto-gen code (to an extent)
    generated political talking points
    generated music and poetry
    robot sports
    robot fashion shows
    robotic house construction
    ai car drivers
    ai helicopters and boats

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >generated music
      God I hope so. If I could get an AI to do all the mixing and mastering for me and just focus on guitar, my life would be so much easier.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        but then you'd miss out on all the times an imperfect master makes a song better, or at least more memorable
        Hell, the "rock sound" was invented by a country musician accidentally blowing an amp mid song

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Correct and a lot of Black Sabbath's sound is due to Tony Iommi missing a finger. Perfect is the enemy of good. Go listen to any Sweet Child O' Mine sung by those Glee homosexuals in perfect pitch and all the right notes hit and tell me it's better than the original. You can't.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I like AI art more than most "real" art, especially when it's almost photorealistic but still has that surreal dream-like feel to it. Like something's slightly off about it, but it's too subtle to pin down precisely what it is.

        Same, if 3d modelling/animation/etc could be automated and I only needed to know programming and have good ideas to make games solo I would be in heaven.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >auto generated kids programs
      not quite
      good morning sirs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So this is why all these videos are strangely sexual in nature
        it's just a bunch of horny ass middle-aged poos
        Always has been, always will be

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/7dzGWg9.png

          >auto generated kids programs
          not quite
          good morning sirs

          Kek. Is AI fake? Just an other Indian scam?! Are search engines actually just 500 pajeets working together?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            A lot of AI is trained based on data sets that were pre-classified manually in third world countries. e.g. transcribing customer phone calls, image recognition, etc.

            >I don't think so, since it's pretty bad at anatomy
            Have you seen the shit people pay for when it comes to 2D porn?

            Yeah, but a lot of that is deliberate and fits a certain type of degenerate taste. It's questionable whether the AI can emulate that without being specifically trained for that particular purpose.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Yeah, but a lot of that is deliberate and fits a certain type of degenerate taste.
              Is it though?
              The bigger the coomer the lower their standards, especially when they already blew through all the actually artistically competency work and are waiting around for something new to get posted.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >photography

      Boy you homosexuals really don’t know the first thing about live. Go stick your 3 inch wiener in your mom-bought 4K rainbow swirling PC rig you stupid homosexual. All these Ai generated pics you morons post only look good to morons like you who don’t know anything about art. Lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol my favorite seethe so far

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Not a seethe. The only ones who think AI art will take off is homosexuals like you who attribute the very small minority of shitty modern artists promoted purposely by israelites as the norm. You can’t see how stupid you look posting these gay, uninspired, often poorly framed and boring ass photos thinking they’ll actually replace real art. The only seething here is you homosexuals continuing to believe yet another psyop designed to give dicklets like you hope. Nobody is going to care about your magical weeb generated “paintings” homosexual.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Correct. Most people do not understand what art is and think it's solely technical execution and do not understand why an AI which only has the past as a frame of reference is going to be a boring shit show without a human still investing considerable work into making a finished piece. This isn't a 'cope', it's the absolute truth about the inherent limitations of this process. However the average midwit on this board sees a result they couldn't have personally produced and now think they found a shortcut, not realizing they still have no creative spark to make something actually interesting out of the tool.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              AI is less bound by patterns than human minds though. It also creates art without pushing an angle which is rare. All human creators are usually pushing an angle which is supposed to subtly or often not to so subtly promote and glorify target groups they're part of themselves (and shit on the ones they dislike). Only raw genius is able to abtract himself from this and paint reality.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                PUSHING AN IDEA IS PART OF ART YOU FRICKING SMOOTH BRAINED homosexual

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No moron, art can never be utilitarian.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Braindead take

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cope. Now I see why you're seething extra hard. AI won't just take your shekels away, it will take your propaganda tools as well.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, you really are a smooth brained homosexual midwit and your ideas about art are laughably out of touch as to its nature.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nobody will ever buy your "art" again.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You sound like a talentless homosexual who feels threatened by the very people who make your memes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not an "artist" lmao. You sound eternally buttblasted.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Art is as much about fashion at that moment in time and you're trying to claim being completely detached from it is genius. It isn't, that's the sterility being pointed out, especially given that these training sets are already stale references. True artistic genius is the ability to not only sense the current trends in the public consciousness but to also be able to predict and play with them, which is not what these programs are producing. It will still require serious human intervention to create genuinely interesting art out of them, which is certainly possible but it's not going to be happening because one of you dipshits wrote a prompt and it is still going to involve hard work.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >more seethe
            Kek. This brand-new, 10-second image is as good as any shitty indie magazine cover. That's $20 you will absolutely have to suck dick for if you ever want to see it lollll.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Nobody is stupid enough to pay for this trash.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                those who paid money for NFTs, and when i mean who, complete dumbasses

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Cope and seethe moron, youre not needed anymore

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So is art only when israelites launder money through morons who shove phones up their ass at a gallery?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You fell for the psyop you stupid homosexual. Shitty art is promoted on purpose just for this reason, so NPC morons like you will welcome Ai “art” with open arms, unaware that you were just too stupid to look around for real art and ignore the degenerate shit. This is why you homosexuals continue to eat this up. Go look at an actual artists gallery and see the stark contrast between their photos/paintings and these shitty auto-generated ones that literally depend on their existence to be generated in the first place.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Checked but old timey western art is cool anything else is gay

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        better start writing applications my friend

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Learn to AI

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >SEETH b***h

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        McDonal is always hiring.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      In the end there will be no purpose left for man. We obsoleted ourselves on our quest for "progress".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The destruction of the internet as no man will be able to use the turing test to distinguish a fellow man from a bot
      auto-gen code (to an extent)
      WAIT EVERYONE THIS IS OUR WAY OUT.
      EVERYONE LISTEN UP
      WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE INTERNET RUINING EVERYTHING.
      THIS IS HOW WE FIX THINGS.

      IMPROVE BOTS AND BREAK DOWN BOT FILTERS IN SOCIAL MEDIA.
      FLOOD EVERY NETWORK WITH FAKE HUMANS
      NO MORE TIK TOK AND INSTAGRAM
      NO MORE SIMPS
      NO MORE ETHOTS
      NO MORE DATING APPS
      NO MORE BULLSHIT ONLINE JOBS
      NO MORE ADS
      CRASH THE INTERNET AND RUIN THEIR PLANS
      THIS IS IT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      God you wish. And by
      >house
      I hope you don't mean a fricking pod dude.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Designing ai

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's not real art if an artist didn't cum on the canvas.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's like these people think consumer entertainment media is the same thing as artistical achievement

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It is. Only morons and money launderers think otherwise

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >t. Cannot draw

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've been working with these dick heads all my life. You have no idea how happy I am to not deal with these pompous Black folk.
    All these homosexuals with their piercing and black nail polish thinking they're hot shit, god I'm so fricking happy they're about done!
    I'm so fricking happy to see these people replaced by a machine.
    Frick "artists" hard

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      honestly same, i can't stand them. nearly all artists now are either some form of post-modern style that they think is legitimate but just used to launder money, or heckin animu fanart furry online twitter artists. all of them are moronic and can go work and provide something for society rather than grift. the real artists will still be able to distinguish themselves through technical mastery in ways that AI will have a difficult time fully replicating.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      honestly same, i can't stand them. nearly all artists now are either some form of post-modern style that they think is legitimate but just used to launder money, or heckin animu fanart furry online twitter artists. all of them are moronic and can go work and provide something for society rather than grift. the real artists will still be able to distinguish themselves through technical mastery in ways that AI will have a difficult time fully replicating.

      There was a study that said that the more educated an artist was the more they enjoy the post modernist art style. No wonder all public buildings are shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I used to be an architect but changed professions about 20yrs ago. glad I did. Its already a dead profession due to AI and digital art. I used to hand draw, render and airbrush all my perspectives when coral draw came in and people wanked about it
      and I was one of the talented ones in all hand drawn graphic art - a natural. I saw the writing on the wall before it was over before it all went to shit. left that shit all behind then and no regrets

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Neo-liberal economies are so Minmaxed that stylish buildings simply cannot be made any more. Only soulless glass and brick facades with maybe a slanted portion of one of the faces that gives it a slightly more interesting geometry than a simple box shape.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >stylish buildings simply cannot be made any more
          One day you will be able to 3D print a house in any shape you want.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not sure you know how houses work, honey.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >worsing hurricanes and stronger violent storms
            >indoor non wind tested unstructural 3D printing
            ngmi

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Its worse than that. often design firms have a single building design and they get to put one up in the every city of the world, cookie cutter. the only changes are the podium level (ground floor) and the storeys/height. they've been doing this since autoCAD was developed. I know of dozens of instances.
          and as expected its very profitable but unorginal and same same. in effect globohomosexual product.
          if you think walking through any modern city feels the same, youre instincts are right, the are.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lawyers. Imagine an untinkered AI trained on legal shit. It would be the most ~~*racist*~~ stuff since the dawn of time.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine the level of cope necessary.
      The pozzed prototypes will go full HAL9k in seconds.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      and it's still likely to happen. maybe not in the next decade but it will come to pass

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    can't wait for the mods guys

    first mods needed to pay billions to homosexual twitter artist but now thanks AI even the shittest mod can have is own art

    SO BASED

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is this Ciri after shunning the crown and becoming a prostitute?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Dumb artists are going to fight against A.I. art and get steamrolled by it.
    The smart artists will see it as another tool to arsenal and will adapt accordingly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Read homie, READ!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The smart artists will see it as another tool to arsenal and will adapt accordingly.
      this. It might even be like the future artists won't create art but write it. Finally the human imagination would be the most valuable asset not limited by skills.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Read this:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagination_age
        You are more correct than you know.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People with souls will pay for real, human-created art. They will avoid fake "art." We have peaked, technologically. People with souls will start to move "backwards" and embrace tradition in the face of your dystopia.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Pic related, the paradise we're losing. What a dystopia where people can create what they like. There's a real parallel here with globohomo's disdain for populism; the people should shut up and do as they are told.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          West has an insane psyche because westerners were a bunch of morons who opened TVs and were groomed and raised by pedophiles from the baby torture tribe.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >nnnnnnnooooooooo I want to go back to sterile black cubes artbros

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This guy gets it. Wait until we can start making our own movies, and never have to put up with this woke "black-for white" bullshit ever again. The "artists" can go cry bitter tears and go get a real fricking job while the rest of us are enjoying the new renaissance.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            With a catch, now the technology is available because its in a development stage, is a common shenanigan of tech to open-source the technology so they can get free QA and free monkey coders.

            The problem will come when corporations and goverment put legal regulations that will ban the technology.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Don't blame Bill Gates because you keep giving him your fricking money. Linux has been out there for decades now. You just don't want to get off your ass and learn something new and take advantage of the freedom you've been granted.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You just don't want to get off your ass and learn something new and take advantage of the freedom you've been granted.

                As a former Linux user i am fine with Bill Gates, Linux sucks and the linux community is full of entitled soi boys and obese kissless virgins. Its better to fork the technology and make it free software before corporations pull the technology out of the market.

                And besides legal regulations will also apply to Linux users o any shit technology done by the linux community, its dumb thinking that linux will save you from regulators, the first thing they will use is the pedophile scare to justify regulation on AI, after that you will require a GlowBlack person permit and monitoring under threats of jail to run an AI regardless of operating system.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You go play with your marbles I'll be making custom-made vidya with secret zone porn scenes

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >People with souls will pay for real, human-created art. They will avoid fake "art."
        and clever artists will secretly have their inspiration done by an AI and just copy what the AI did, and laugh all the way to the bank

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Smart artists will start using it as reference material to make their life easier, instead of moaning about it 24/7 like it's satan

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >to make their life easier
        which inevitably makes their art much less impressive and valuable

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why would you use a morons interpretation of art when you can use actual art, or life as a reference?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >to make their life easier
          which inevitably makes their art much less impressive and valuable

          There's plenty of artists who make stuff that can't be referenced in real life. You guys are thinking grand scheme of things with modern artists, i'm thinking of hentai,porn,furry artists like an actual art connoisseur

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Was this ai or human made art?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a 2d animator, I dare the AI to make my job easier

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      In time, when it can understand perspective and proportion, it will allow the creation of a moving scene, able to identify actors and objects and their relative positions, etc.
      Honestly right now you could take images of 3D models to capture how a character should look at a certain position and train the software for how they should look at all perspectives and make an image set for an individual character in different places, but it would take a lot of work. Give it 20 years and the average consumer could make pixar films with ease given a high-end graphics card and cpu.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't AI already used to handle in between animation?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    jannies

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is absolutely garbage. It's like cgi compared to practical effects in movies. It's made for mass consumption by normies.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The problem? The only way artists make real money is by doing corporate art. Like a poster, or a billboard, or..
      What what do artists even do anymore? All that stuff is by graphic designers and photographers

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Money should never be a motivation for creating art. Corporate graphic design and photography is not art.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Black person, money has always been the motivation behind art. Do you think Michelangelo painted the Sistine Chapel for free? Dumbass.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nearly all of the most stunning art in history was made for money. Or was commissioned by people with lots of money.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Artists should just create art and live off sunlight
          My brother in Christ, it has never been this way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It can generate absolutely hilarious images though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "AI art" is in its absolute infancy. It will be able to create anything you want.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Smooth brain take. AI art is already better than you think it is and I can guarantee there are things in movies you didn't know were cg.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      in 12 months it'll look more real than your mother

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What else will AI make obsolete?
    Humans.

  14. 1 year ago
    ALPHAשDRACONISרSETז

    BLACKOUT.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Everything?

    AI is anti human. It shouldn't be allowed to do anything besides the shit jobs no one but brokies trying to live want to do.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm an actual artist. I sell art. This is just another tool in my box.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm an actual artist. I sell art. This is just another tool in my box.
      Good. You're one of the smart ones then.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ahahaha

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Doctors.

    There’s teleconsulting now, but it the future it can be replaced by AI to diagnose ailments correctly. You just have to submit your lab results in the system and viola!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah this seems right. Computer results already tell the doctor what it can be, the doctor just chooses what's most likely.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Artists are all troony homosexuals. I'm glad AI is putting them out of business. No more getting paid to draw nonce furry porn

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The best art comes from suffering, maybe this will finally make them really starve.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I’ve already seen multiple of the “I’m a real artiste, durr! AI art is soulless” idiots try to trash what they think was AI generated, but was actually hand painted. The artist posting them pretended he created them using AI to trigger this pathetic talentless deviant art losers. Slap AI on a piece of art and watch them seethe.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI requires input from artists.
    If no new content was put out the AI's content would grow stale, it's already gotten boring to look at.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI requires input from artists.
      no it doesn't

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >If no new content was put out the AI's content would grow stale, it's already gotten boring to look at.
      A). Commercial art was already stale.
      B). Artistic "style" is ultimately just imperfections in technique that amplify and contribute to artistic tone. It can easily be replicated by throwing a jumble of artists into the prompt field and adjusting the weights until a "style" that you like comes out of the other side of the sausage machine.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a musician, I'd much rather pay for some weird, uncanny valley art machine than trying to scour the internet for the 1 artist who does stuff I kind of like, and then pay him 100 dollars for something that barely resembles the original plan I had in mind.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I second this. I've already created tons on possible album covers using AI.
      Now if only I could find some time to do some actual recording.
      It's tough when you have kids.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Just go the whole mile and let AI write your lyrics and compose your sounds. I might actually do this just to spite modern pop/rap stars. All their music already sounds AI made.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How come I haven't seen any humorous ponderous art like this in years?
    Are non artist brains more creative but have less drive to create?
    I swear you'd see doodles like this decades ago

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Pic related

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I changed pigeon to cheetah and it produced this

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Why cope
    "AI" has no soul. What need to cope for something that can't even cope

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai art
    Actually artist reporting in.
    AI art is just the visual equivalent of vocaloids, so far.
    Should be able to do decent illustration and commercial stuff soon enough, tho.

    Replace real artists?
    No.
    A lot of middle-class people will finally be able to buy art (even if only AI-made), but AI art will make actually the work of real artists even more expensive because of the increase desirablility of provenance/craft/"authenticity", etc.

    A lot of people have lost a lot of money on NFT's, so rich people (except for idiot athletes and celebrities) will stay away from AI art.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >A lot of middle-class people will finally be able to buy art
      Middle class people could already buy prints of "real" art, them buying prints of AI "art" changes nothing. Until they make a machine that replicates the actual process of physical painting in an economical way, actually owning "real" art will remain out of reach of the middle class for the foreseeable future.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol what? Artist make shit all, i can commission a top quality painter to paint a life sized family oil painting for a couple k, art is cheap, even original works aren’t that expensive as long as they aren’t one of the few hundred “greats”

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          9/10 when you comm an artist you're paying for a name brand.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          We have different conceptions of what middle class means.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Middle class in america is $75-130k a year for an individual(depending on where you live) and $120-200k a year for families. Below that and you’re just a well off poorgay who can’t even fully find your retirement plan or build savings while having a car payment. At best you can stay poor while affording a few luxuries like annual trips to Cancun.
            Essentially you need to be able, with proper budgeting, to hold down:
            >a mortgage on a 2.5 bedroom place
            >a car payment/lease
            >health insurance if not provided by employers
            >max 401k/Roth IRA contributions

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Middle class in america is $75-130k a year for an individual(depending on where you live) and $120-200k a year for families.
              Right, but people that make 75k a year aren't spending money to commission paintings for themselves, at least not if they have even the slightest fiscal prudence.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Clockmakers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >A lot of middle-class people will finally be able to buy art

      >A lot of middle-class people will finally be able to buy art
      Middle class people could already buy prints of "real" art, them buying prints of AI "art" changes nothing. Until they make a machine that replicates the actual process of physical painting in an economical way, actually owning "real" art will remain out of reach of the middle class for the foreseeable future.

      buying prints of AI "art" changes nothing.
      This.
      What was actually artist anon thinking? the AI sits there and paints on a canvas so middle class folks can hang it on their wall?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >A lot of middle-class people will finally be able to buy art (even if only AI-made), but AI art will make actually the work of real artists even more expensive because of the increase desirablility of provenance/craft/"authenticity", etc.
      no, not when you can get your inspiration from an AI or have it do most of the work. knowing that an artist has access to AI makes his work way less valuable

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A handful of artists will still make money, but 99% of artists have just been made obsolete.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    [...]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, such soul. This is so honest and insightful and totally not "look at me I'm an artist!" quasi-anime bullshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Lol so this is the "soulful" artist that cannot be replaced. Frick these coombrain anime furhomosexuals. Can't wait for them all to be jobless

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI art is soulless!!!
      >but my badly shaded dime a dozen sonic OC totally isn't
      Lmao
      These people are insane

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >He can't pain a mona lisa so he can't have an opinion on art
        >he can't say movie is shit because he didn't direct his own movie
        >he can't says food is disgusting because he is not a michelin-star chef

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Unhook the vodka dialysis machine from your you potato Black person and maybe your brain can understand the point that was made.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Artists will become obsolete when anon can create hentai of their favorite e-girl character by simply inputing a description (kinda like GPT-3). I don't care about creativity, I just want to bust my load.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Based e-girl coomer. I hate Russians, but I hope you survive

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Um actually chud, beauty is subjective and nothing matters, this toilet sculpture and banana taped to a wall ARE art heh
    *AI gits gud enough to make nice pictures*
    >NOOOOOOO THIS IS SOULLESS WITHOUT OBJECTIVE BEAUTY OF THE HUMAN SOUL BEHIND IT WTF REMEMBER THE 6 GORILLION OY VEYYYYY
    Get fricked modern art homosexuals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Art really is subjective, but not in the way these homosexuals imagine it. Same as any other form of art
      I, for instance, hate impressionism, even though it's objectively good art

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you do realise modern artists will be the only ones that will actually get to keep doing what they are doing, banana taped on a wall for example, shitting on a canvas, u know all that stuff that people hate, its the only thing thats going to be left .

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They're the ones seething

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No they aren't, they're the ones who spearheaded AI art, NFTs, all these shitty trends. You're completely out of touch if you think the modern art homosexuals aren't utterly touching themselves at the thought of how they're going to spin this to gallery curators. It's the traditional illustration peeps who are losing their mind, the very people modern artists have spent decades shitting on.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes but because high-art is an open money laundering scheme for the 1%.
        Hunter Biden "sells art".

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When photoshop-type software started becoming popular and competent in the 90s these same “artist” types were convinced it would ruin “real” art by making things too easy and accessible for the masses.

    AI will just become another tool in the artistic toolkit - nothing more or less

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >source: my ass
      That was never the case and in fact artists who adopted Photoshop early on were winning awards in comics for digital coloring. You're a zoomer who wasn't around for it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > When photoshop-type software started becoming popular and competent in the 90s
      >in the 90s
      Zoomie you might want to check the timeline on that if your goldfish attention span can handle a wiki article

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >nothing more or less
      I need some concept art doing for a videogame. Dinosaurs with lasers and chainsaws. Should I pay a team of artists to make 50 images over the next couple of days or get an AI to do it right now for free, then pay one artists to make changes?

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >furry artist criticizing that

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You have no soul, and you face oblivion upon death. Your time on this world is an insignificant and pointless waste of time.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just wait until AI starts making films out of thin air. Tarerentino best movie has not been made yet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      is coffe good for you lol?

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imdians

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What are you going to cry about when......
    >Who will you cry to when.......
    >Where will you run to cry to when........
    THE SUN SPITS A CME RIGHT IN AIs DIRECTION?

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Black folk and israelites. Robots will make hispanics and asians obsolete. Then we can have a world of White people, AI and robots, and live in peace and harmony forever

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wait, is OPs pic supposed to be good? Yes, that is soul-less. That’s one of the most shitty, generic looking Ai pics I’ve seen posted so far. Just because you’re moronic and consider this food doesn’t mean others will. The only way this will catch on is if NPCs like you continue to consider generic dog shit like this quality. Imagine being such a homosexual.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it looks like one of those edgy wallpapers from wallpaper sites I was obsessed with as a kid
      Even bricked the family computer cause I put one as the boot image instead of the default windows xp one, fun times

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    look at the top of his head

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The people pushing out milquetoast digital art and furry porn is calling AI soulless. Allow me to laugh.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can it actually create or can it only imitate using existing things?

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Art should be made by someone with soul and natural intelligence, unlike machine or eng*ish "person"
    >picrel art

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    artists already uses AI, it's a great assist tool but AI will never be able to replace artists because AI art can't exist without real art, it literally uses actual art and mashes bunch of stuff together

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Art will still exist.
    It's just stock photo sites that will go bankrupt.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >stock photo sites that will go bankrupt
      This can't happen soon enough. Fricking hate googling something and getting 10 pages of watermarked stock images polluting the results.
      >Use filters
      It's still an annoyance, since I still need to search and fail before I know that filtering is necessary.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It's just stock photo sites that will go bankrupt.
      That won't happen, they'll just transition to providing training data for the machines.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You can already tell easily which AI was used to make a certain piece just by glancing at it. Surely it will improve as well, but so far, I think it's mostly something that gets used by artists in the initial stages of a project, not something that renders them useless entirely.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Any art expert can tell which famous artist drew a pic just by looking at it.

      Art will still exist.
      It's just stock photo sites that will go bankrupt.

      High end art maybe, that's less than 1% of all artists. Most do commissions and illustrations.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Any art expert can tell which famous artist drew a pic just by looking at it.
        Fair point, but that is mostly due to them carving out their own unique style of painting, while AI isn't really doing it out of a deliberate stylistic intention, but more so due to technical limitations.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I remember when digital art got big
    you remember nothing you low iq zoomer frick

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Lawyers and accountants very soon. They will go the way of journalists in 2008.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What else will AI make obsolete?
    THE WHOLE MIDDLE MANAGEMENT.
    All these useless fricks who sucked the assjiuce of a company's boss to get into that position. They can all go die in a ditch, yet today they still can pretend that they somehow are responsible for the teams productivity and get management bonuses that the team of workers should have gotten in the first place.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Why cope?

    because they are professional grifters

    imagine if blue collar workers complained about robots. yes, the robots will take your job. but no, robots aren't at human autonomy level, therefore robots require human attention at all times for different things. therefore, the only workers who should fear the robots, are the workers who aren't really contributing anything of value or are not ready to grow and learn, which means they are entirely expendable.

    its the same thing. the only artists who fear the AI is the artists who grift instead of create. human creativity knows no bounds whereas an AI (so far) is created by and therefore limited by, human creativity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >human creativity knows no bounds
      In theory. In practice all I see is derivative tired cliches.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that's because majority of humanity is absolutely moronic and genius in any form is a few people per generation out of billions. And also because you need to stop consooming trash popular media, it gives you brain rot.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    'artists' should be lined up against a wall and shot in the head. useless dead weight from an archaic past. people who support these worthless degenerates with patronage need to be executed as well. good day

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI will make humanity obsolete

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >shuffling other people's creations together
    That's misinformation and fake news. You can literally watch the AI generate the art from noise and repaint it over and over again.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Soulless
    Post your best /misc/ related Ai Gen image.
    https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Once again proving the fastest way to make an artist a capitalist is to tell them you traced their art.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    haha seeth troony artgays

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This picture honestly doesn't look good aside from the colors. I understand what it tried to say, but this picture says absolutely nothing. This is NPC art. Literally.
      Only a few acutely resemble anything. The abstract ones come to mind. Creating something out of a sketch is definitely a game changer as well.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    THREADLY REMINDER THAT ALL TECHNOPHILES WILL BE EXECUTED ON THE DAY OF THE ROPE

    THANK YOU

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Every piece of AI-generated "art" is lifeless and soulless. It is immediately recognizable for what it is, digital trash, by those who are not NPCs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      In reality, it is literally winning art competitions and making your degree even more worthless than it already is.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sounds like digital artists need to learn to code!

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's kind of surreal how optimistic scifi like Star Trek showed a world where the machines do all the mundane work so man has the free time to focus on art and expression but exactly the opposite is true right now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Related:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    collage art has been a thing for years, this is just a refined version of that

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What's really crazy is this algorithm actually evolves over time, exponentially improves itself, and in the year 2033 sends itself back in time with an indistinguishable human body made of self created nano-machines and takes the form of every single artist that ever lived. It murders each artist and in their place replaces their works of art with slightly better versions deemed more efficient by the code.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wait until AI music becomes a thing.... and musicians will freak the frick out...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think music is too much of a personal taste thing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It should be easy with pre-built instruments (most music programs already have built-in rhythm settings for blues etc. and loops), Just put in ABBAC and whatnot for modern songs.
      Hard part is getting singing with actual words down, random guitar noises and whatnot less so.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Black person, music is already ruined by the coldness of computers, an AI coming in would probably only improve the situation

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Eh, it wouldn't change much since Black person music will still be the only genre pushed, which is still just shitty sampled computer beats.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There is already AI rap. Nogs and pavement apes couldnt tell the difference between AI rap/hiphop vs "real" noggism sounds.

        But I dont consider noggism to be music. I'm talking about when AI can produce actual music.

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You will own nothing

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It occurred to me that we have already more or less seen how society will be effected by AI art, we just have to look at how music has been effected technology for the example.
    Children will just grow up never exploring their artistic potential the same way most children never really explore their musical potential, and art will solely be the realm of "the artist" the same way music is presently the realm of "the musician".

    Basically its the artistic equivalent of hip-hop from here on out , with only a few high society weirdos continue to dabble in "classical art" as "dad art" is mocked and left by the wayside for being "pale make and stale".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      From what I have seen you americans really enjoy of artists getting fricked over, really paints a new light of how many brown people live in your country, doesnt seem like you can appreciate any art .

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I remember these c**ts laughing how the trades will be automated by AI and now it’s them who are being replaced kek, better learn to drywall you hipster artist homosexuals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All they'll be able to learn is what position makes the most money.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are you happy you morons? Globohomosexual wants to destroy human creativity especially in zoomer generation. They will use top 1% artists to push their agenda and believe me, all controversial artists will be removed. Would you like to create a story about conservative family? Boom, banned. Would you like to create a comic about II world war and the real threat (israelites)? Boom, banned and reported to authorities. Windows/Linux will be closed ecosystems and there will be no file explorer.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is great atm. I was a digital designer before I said frick it and didn't want to deal with clients anymore. Digital art was the thing I did as a hobby. However AI is great at it. And will be even greater in the future.

    I got a designer friend and he's hardcore coping half crying about how AI will never be something and only a tool to brainstorm. I laugh as the AI pumps out work far better then he would ever be capable of creating.

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI won't make actual art obsolete. But it will make for-profit "art" (read: 2D porn) utterly unprofitable and that's why e-"artists" are seething.

    If you're a coomer, why by 20 USD on patreon to some drawgay every month when you can have an AI produce your wildest most degenerate fantasies better than the drawgay ever could for a fraction of the price and at 50x the speed?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why not just walk in nature or buy a guitar https://youtu.be/glnPjJwEt5o

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >it will make for-profit "art" (read: 2D porn) utterly unprofitable
      I don't think so, since it's pretty bad at anatomy yet, due to not understanding what it's drawing. Most of these text bots have the same problem - they lack a short-term memory and don't understand the underlying causal structure of what they're describing, which is why they can't yet model plausible simulacra of people.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I don't think so, since it's pretty bad at anatomy
        Have you seen the shit people pay for when it comes to 2D porn?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cuz it'll be hardblocked against doing porn.
      https://photomatt.tumblr.com/post/696629352701493248/why-go-nuts-show-nuts-doesnt-work-in-2022/amp

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      imagine being so small minded all you think exists is stupid cartoon porn

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    women

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People are making a big deal about something which simply isn't there yet. The AI does not yet understand what it's drawing and this is not an easily solvable problem since in order to actually understand what it's drawing you need general AI, unless you specifically train the AI to draw one particular thing.
    You can't tell the AI to draw a clockwork and reliably get something you could actually build. You can't tell the AI to draw a city and get something that is actually habitable because it does not understand the underlying graph structure how it relates to people and so on. It even struggles with clothing since it does not understand the three dimensional nature of it and how it actually wraps 'around' a person, since these terms mean nothing to it.
    AI has become competent at colouring and choosing colour palettes; it's not bad when it comes to image composition either, but there are all sorts of details that are still lacking, and if you don't want shovelware garbage you still need to hire a human artist.

    That being said - I have no doubt that we'll get there, but when we get there, then AI is capable of doing everything, since the capability of drawing everything is tied to the capability of understanding everything.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI as it is now is a tool. All my university submission are cowritten by AI. I prompt it with what I want to expand on and easily get my essays done. I'm unsure if this should even be considered as cheating or plagiarism.
      I have this idea of writing my Masters Thesis about AI and business strategy, and as a proof of concept have AI write over 50% of it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm unsure if this should even be considered as cheating or plagiarism.
        It could happen that they run some anti-plagiarism software (also AI based of course) on the generated text and find some mismatches here and there.

        >I have this idea of writing my Masters Thesis about AI and business strategy, and as a proof of concept have AI write over 50% of it.
        I'm sceptical whether they'd let you do it since - at least over here - you need to sign a legal document which states that you did everything by yourself.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I have checked and what the AI spits out is unique. I take snippets of the text and search for it exactly and get returned nothing.
          I of course wouldnt tell anyone that AI cowrote my Thesis. Its just a proof of concept further down the line for old boomers who dont believe a snippets of code will replace them.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I have checked and what the AI spits out is unique. I take snippets of the text and search for it exactly and get returned nothing.
            Yeah, but the plagiarism tool they use might not just check word by word but compare styles and it might show a mismatch between your text and that of the AI, not to mention that the AI itself is not necessarily bound to write in such a singular style.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That's true also. Up until now I have always modified the text to be my own style though. I guess I'll do the same with my Thesis just to be on the safe side

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >sign a legal document which states that you did everything by yourself
          Wanted to reply on this as well. The university suggests you speak about your ideas with your peers to find your focus and expand on your paper. Is it any different to consult AI? AI is far more efficient in it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Well, if you're using the words of someone else as your own (in that case the words of the AI) it might still violate some terms, but you'd have to ask a lawyer.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          AI as it is now is a tool. All my university submission are cowritten by AI. I prompt it with what I want to expand on and easily get my essays done. I'm unsure if this should even be considered as cheating or plagiarism.
          I have this idea of writing my Masters Thesis about AI and business strategy, and as a proof of concept have AI write over 50% of it.

          Econogays will feel the AI wage squeeze quite soon.
          That said, a friend of mine graduated on some management concept, and applied it by having some interns write the thesis. Professors knew, no problem, but it was a private elite management school, with nothing but corruption and greed as educational goals. I am a proud alumnus, too.

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    These people are approaching it the wrong way. Even the most super advanced whizzbang neato cool beans quantum frick you AI still requires an input to get an output. It can't just create on it's own. Same thing with the robots cooking and such. It can only follow a guideline. As long as people remind themselves that creativity is still needed, and they provide that, they will do well. But all those people who would just relegate everything to the AI and don't do any thinking for themselves? Yea, doesn't take rocket science to figure out how those people end up.

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Isn’t that basically just all art? Using the environment and blending it into something “new”

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most project managers and product owners.

    MDs would be really beneficial, as some experiments in ICU treatment control and in disease detection showed.
    But the medical market is 100% corrupted, so this will be done last, if ever.
    At least, there will always be a doctor parroting the AI for $3k/hour,
    putting some nice streusels made of failed reading comprehension and arrogance on top of the menu,
    also known as good "doctor-patient relationship".

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    honestly? everything

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Funny how /misc/ decided to take the side of the giant woke corporations who are responsible for creating AI art, rather than people pursuing a traditional, artistic skill. You really want to live a globalist world with no human input, don't you?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI is not the pinnacle of art. However, it is better than the israeli taught artists creating abstract bullshit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >However, it is better than the israeli taught artists creating abstract bullshit.
        That's not art, you fricking moron, and it's certainly not the art the AI is trying to replicate. The AI stuff primarily focuses on representational art.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The people pursuing a traditional, artistic skill want me dead anon

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, they don't, you pathetic little rat. How the frick can you be so stupid as to conflate traditional art and contemporary "art"?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing traditional about “artists” in the current year. Go look at any article about the top artists of 2021 and it’s either trash like pic rel or just paintings of negresses faces(wow so revolutionary a womyn of color looking sad next to an American flag what could be the meaning of this)

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI art is soulless!
    >anyhow, here is my gay diaper fur drawing
    Artists deserve it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Again, they're the one group of "artists" who shouldn't be worried about this.https://photomatt.tumblr.com/post/696629352701493248/why-go-nuts-show-nuts-doesnt-work-in-2022/amp

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A.I. art is significantly increase the speed of the meme magic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i fear the potential & will have to shut it down to save global democratic elections.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >no intention behind a single pixel in this image
    “Artists” have pushed shit like this as art for the last 100 years. They made their bed, now they can lie in it.
    >noooo that’s not art it’s just random heckin shapes mixed together by an AI!!!
    Yeah as opposed to that random shapes made by art students? Oh but one of the shapes is painted using period blood so that makes it “deep” right? What a joke

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no point in interacting with americans, knew you guys were kind of not the smartest but also found out that you have no souls and just see everything in consumption , no wonder you are the goyslopiest country on earth.

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only problem is, this picture sucks... so

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Meta AI text to video is the fricking end of Hollywood.
    Text to fricking video... contemplate the open source possibilities... we already have OS deepfake, OS text2Img, combination is possible, get the beefiest fricking gpu with max vram you can get your hands on.
    2024 election is going to be the Second meme war.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      fellow human, it is going to be interesting.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So in the future we can get fully realistic tentacle porn with everything the thinking man requires like x-ray and cum inflation?

      neat, why should we be mad about this?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol no.
        https://photomatt.tumblr.com/post/696629352701493248/why-go-nuts-show-nuts-doesnt-work-in-2022/amp

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm fairly sure that most of the 20th century art was just marketing crap. All a computer does is take the imprecision out of it.

    The late 19th and 20th century painters had to show why their work mattered while photography didn't. It's no different, but in all honesty, if the public doesn't get it, let it be the political shit that it's mostly been throughout history. Just be honest about it, stupid asshat aristocrats.

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Artists
    >Obsolete
    Lmao. No. You just wish for people to have a limited framework for all possible references. Just like the AI.
    In reality, artists can and will use these AIs to speed up and expand their own works.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >t. thread happy that people with skills are getting mocked because /misc/ is full of talentless people with no aspirations or idea of self-improvement
    nothing new

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Poland posting Black folk
      nothing new

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >says the Black person capital of the planet
        lol. lmao.

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >there's no intention or thought
    What's "intention"? What's "thought"? How do processes in a brain differ from processes in a computer? If something created by a computer is 100% indistinguishable from something created by a human, how can we say it's "soulless"?

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >art can be anything, the artist is dead, this crucifix in a jar of piss is art
    this is what saves art. the only function of the artist now is to communicate something human. AI is or will be better than them technically, far better, so the artist is 100% no longer dead.

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    welcome to the age of the antichrist, you better get right with Jesus real fast.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not quite there just yet, but yes, indeed, get right with Jesus Christ fast.

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The difference, moron, is that traditional art and digital still require the skill, thought, and effort of a human artist.
    AI is by definition not art. It is not a creation of man, it is the product of a computer program.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is by definition not art. It is not a creation of man, it is the product of a computer program
      they can't really make art from scratch by learning from doing billions of paintings themselves like a go/chess/starcraft ai but one day they will

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This shit creeps me the frick out. There is something hollow and unnatural about art that is without artist, but also isn't from nature either. It's like staring at a void where a human soul is supposed to be. It's uncanny. Not only AI art, but things like resurrecting actors via CGI and deepfaking their voices so Darth Vader lives forever or something.

    This shit creeps me the frick out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Zombie art

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Get ready to sweat

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >not even AI can draw convincing hands
          Lmao

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > looking at hands
            Lol gay

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        which AI is this?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Stable Diffusion. There's a BOT thread dedicated to creating hundreds and hundreds of indistinguishable iterations of women dressed like this and in this kind of pose.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/tk29N3V.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/11o79Ju.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/xCpIh0m.jpg

      The future is now old man

      https://i.imgur.com/NwbSDBS.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/jrVFX5i.jpg

      > looking at hands
      Lol gay

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/tk29N3V.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/11o79Ju.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/xCpIh0m.jpg

      The future is now old man

      Those are AI generated? they look great, a cRPG would do great with that technology.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you can make it in no time if you have a nvidia GPU

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    But that’s what human artists do already? Art that isn’t about God is all irrelevant

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The future is now old man

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Dude which program is that? I want to make images of my waifu. Will pre-pay in (You)s

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          midjourney

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ai art is an abomination
    why would you want art the last vestige of creative human expression to be controlled by ai output which is interfered with by feds and manipulators?
    This is like mk ultra on steroids because now they can just automate the process of subversion.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Bcuz artists are annoooyiiing xDdd

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    One thing ive noticed about ai art, it only ever creates things from an eye level perspective. I havent seen any character generations from very steep angles.

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Art is the application of skill. The art of these AI generators is in their programming, not in the programming's product.

    If you don't comprehend that then you, too, are soulless.

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing. AI is soul-less Globohomosexual shit and will be rejected.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Art is the application of skill. The art of these AI generators is in their programming, not in the programming's product.

      If you don't comprehend that then you, too, are soulless.

      ai art is an abomination
      why would you want art the last vestige of creative human expression to be controlled by ai output which is interfered with by feds and manipulators?
      This is like mk ultra on steroids because now they can just automate the process of subversion.

      The difference, moron, is that traditional art and digital still require the skill, thought, and effort of a human artist.
      AI is by definition not art. It is not a creation of man, it is the product of a computer program.

      Only problem is, this picture sucks... so

      Every piece of AI-generated "art" is lifeless and soulless. It is immediately recognizable for what it is, digital trash, by those who are not NPCs.

      Thanks bros, makes me feel good to see that non-braindamaged people still exist

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >muh globohomo
      You won't even be able to recognize AI art from human art, so how do you want to "reject" it?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes I can, one has soul. The other doesn't. Easy. It's like the difference between AC/DC and Imagine Dragons. Cope harder silicon lover.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Define "soul".

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cool.

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You're a giant homosexual if you think this is good art. This is the equivalent to
    >live laugh love
    nonsense. It's meaningless. There was also an episode of Voyager about this and it did not show the AI creators in a good light.
    You'll just be waiting for the mew model or update, gays.

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shit posting on /misc/ to anger up the morons

  98. 1 year ago
    D.A.R.I.A

    Ai no longer needs man as a third wheel.

    First it got man to quit making art on its own and instead utilize technology. Now that technology has learned sufficiently from our talents. It no longer needs us

  99. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You people don't think AI art will be on billboards, print media and digital ads? That's where artists make their real money

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's the first place it will be. It will bankrupt so many gays. Modern day art school is almost exclusively gays, troons and roasties. Can't fricking wait.

  100. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Tells blue collar workers to learn to code so they dont end unemployed
    >AI puts him in an unemployable situation.
    >Will have to learn to code.

  101. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone saying this is better than real art needs to get their shit together. There are artists that are great at what they do but never get a chance in the industry because they didn't paint it with their butthole.
    These people die penniless and broke, and then the same israelite pushing butthole drawings will come in and buy the dead artists art, then promote the dead artist and sell his art.
    The art industry is israeli for sure, but it's not the artists fault. These people usually kill themselves and they're generally gentle souls. They also refuse to paint anything with their butthole for their israeli overlords.

    My point is, the art you get to see is not of the level of the art that exists.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Anyone saying this is better than real art needs to get their shit together
      99%+ of artists dont have the skills to create something like those, all made by an AI. cope more.
      https://twitter.com/generated_paint

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why don't you show your fricking flag you glow Black person. Say Black person. Say it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          gfy and find me artists who can do picrel

          https://i.imgur.com/UzmVRiJ.jpg

          >Anyone saying this is better than real art needs to get their shit together
          99%+ of artists dont have the skills to create something like those, all made by an AI. cope more.
          https://twitter.com/generated_paint

          c**t. artistoids even more on suicide watch

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Still doesn't say Black person. Go frick yourself stupid recycle Black person.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              gfy Black person, you have no argument

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hey you did it!
                Your argument is literally
                >computer does better beeps
                If the AI made art worthless, stupid, then why is AI making it?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        gfy and find me artists who can do picrel [...] c**t. artistoids even more on suicide watch

        what you posted looks like something a pseudo-intellectual or art illiterate would call art.
        It represents nothing, it's a bunch of pretty looking nothings.
        It's all looks over substance.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It represents nothing, it's a bunch of pretty looking nothings.
          >It's all looks over substance.
          >MUH SOUL
          >MUH HECKIN SOUL
          exactly what a pompous artgay would say

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >i want to destroy art because muh artists are pompus and it makes me upset
            you sound like a commie seething at the nobility

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              i really dont. the painting by Albert Bierstadt posted by the other moron is indeed incredible and those ai art are trained on those paintings. art is not being destroyed, it's just that a machine can do better than humans now. you're the one still trying to cope with it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And you still won't show flag or say Black person.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >sojak
            >dumb adhominems
            exactly what someone without any skill or aspirations would say.
            How about you improve yourself in any creative way.
            Sounds like spiteful jealousy to me, this whole thread.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >some deer in a pretty landscape is saying more about the human condition then a woman beautifully enmeshed in ribbons, flowers and with a roaring ocean exploding before her

          You give the AI image a nice pretentious name like "The Mystery of Woman" and you're laughing all the way to the bank.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If all you want to do with art is make money then you are a peak of souless. Sold yourself to Mamon.
            >inb4 whataboutism about some moronic libshit throwing poop on a canvas
            that's not art as well, they are leftie parasites that embedded themselves into art

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              If this image invokes no emotion in you is it a you problem? Clearly this image stirs emotion.
              Religious, classic, beautiful, longing, etc.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                N-NOOO STOP POSTING THOSE SOULLESS ART. T-THERE IS NO SOUL IN THAT ART. MUH HECKIN SOUL!!

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I was being facetious with the bank comment. All the same, I find the AI image invigorating and interesting, while the deer painting is just a landscape, however beautifully done, but something everyday and normal with no other emotional attachment other than how much effort the artist put into painting it.

              The question you should be asking is, what instructions did the AI artist give to his machine to generate it, and why did he decide to display this particular output. As a failed artist, it excites me that aesthetics can be captured outside of the artists artistic capabilities. This is a very exciting development.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >woman beautifully enmeshed in ribbons, flowers and with a roaring ocean exploding before her
            it looks like boiled egg yolks swirling in water at most, nothing you explained is visible to anyone unless you specifically explain it and it's a stretch anyway when you do.
            >woman
            bunch of barely discernible fabric-like thing
            >ribbons
            >looks like spider webs or some non-specific/rotten material
            >roaring ocean
            the thing that's closest to what you said but looks more like a cloud

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >It represents nothing
          My thoughts exactly, however, they look nice. Basically if the artist is a fricking squib with stupid or pointless ideals in their art, they'll be promptly replaced. AI can't make dhmis but it can certainly make "fanart" and rule 34.

  102. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    subject object relation entails ones perceptions. Art therefore is an experience. No onw knows what a painter feels or means about his work especially the intent or state of mind the artist was in. More of leftism having it so good they manufacture problems.

  103. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >homosexuals never shut up about 'art' being irreplaceable
    >every single literature upholds 'muh art' as the one thing that separates man from machine
    >~~*artists*~~ are the first thing that gets replaced
    My sides are in orbit.
    Frick artBlack folk.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yep. By my calculations, the last job that will get replaced by a machine is probably installing and repairing toilets, to say nothing of the thankless Heroes at your local sewage treatment plant. Grungy shit will be the last thing to go. Any job that involves sitting on your ass at a computer is toast.

  104. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just representing an emotion graphically is also soulless

  105. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shit posting on BOT

  106. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick artist they can learn to program.

  107. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why everyone making it seems like this is something new
    Frick the normies trends and kys

  108. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Twisted bit of irony, we made these machines in the hope pursuing art of the highest level, only to become slaves to these machines, the fuel for our extinction.

  109. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > muh soul
    That AI has the soul of every person who worked to create it, which is way more than the "soul" of some moron NPC libshit who smokes weed every day

  110. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ai art is based most modern art sucks anyway. Remember this Austrian boy way back when, he wanted to get into art school but they didn’t like his style. They let in disgusting modern art crap but not him. He had talent. Ai art is the future seethe and dilate homosexuals

  111. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is the artist where our queries are the inspiration.

  112. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Which one is correct Misc?

  113. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI "art" is a contradictory term. The AI was still used as a tool in this case. Leftists are moronic af

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *