An AGI should be capable of figuring out how to accomplish a long term terminal task "Make a popular twitter account with 10000 followers" without being provided specific instructions.
It's supremely hilarious that we had months of GPT-4 doommongering and now that it turned out to be a slightly better text prediction model (the shock) we're just moving on seamlessly to Rapture +1
>what are diminishing returns
We'll just add another 45TB of text to the training data bro, hardware will advance exponentially bro, it can't modify itself or learn but it is agi bro trust me bro 15iq clueless redditors said so its coming bro
It's designed to work help desk jobs, not help you with your videogames. This is a potentially world economy revolutionizing tech, they don't give a shit that your shitty Warhammer autism doesn't work with it.
So? Whats the problem? Tell him it's for learning purposes or something to conceal the inflating term. You already know how to evade it either from the first shot or fifth.
>AGI isn't even definable by the people actually researching it.
Very true, but the definition most people are talking about is the one from the science fiction of yesteryear, or at least that is the example. Likely, we will have AI that advanced within our lifetimes if we continue along our current pace. The only thing I could see stopping some of those AI from existing is a ban on researching, developing or employing advanced kinds of AI. I think that will be the case in the future if it does not completely destroy society first, although we will probably suffer the consequences of it first before coming to that decision.
>GPT-5 being AGI?
Pretty low. The GPTs up to this point is just really good next-word predictor. If you got one good enough, sure, I think you could consider it an AGI, but it's going to have to go way beyond what GPT4 can do. And even then it will hugely inefficient, and some better method will eventually be discovered. Unless 5 is definitively AGI out of the gate, I'd say we have to wait a few more iterations. No one is going to play the is-it isn't-it game when we have a real AGI, it'll be pretty obvious.
As points out, GPT is great at mimicking intelligent conversation, but unable to really learn. It is essentially a sophisticated search function on highly curated training data. GPT-5 will be a quantitative change, not qualitative, and a qualitative change is needed to move towards AGI.
GPT doesn't have a model for arithmetics
GPT doesn't have a model for chess
GPT doesn't have a model for anything but language, it's very good at guessing which token comes next, but that's it, so it is considered narrow intelligence.
Even though it can perform on a human level or better in non-language domains like programming, it still does that only by guessing the next best token, it doesn't really "understand" the rules of a programming language.
Once we have narrow intelligence for every domain a human can understand and combine them together into one model, we will have "true" AGI.
Yes we can use language or symbols to model domains, but GPT isn't using language to model anything, it is a model to generate language. Low IQ anons like you won't get the difference
>GPT doesn't have a model for anything but language, it's very good at guessing which token comes next, but that's it, so it is considered narrow intelligence.
>I really like trannies >see this hot af femboy twink with a huge penis bulge >decide to sexually assault him since I've never seen such a unholy alliance >plastic penis falls off as soon as I remove "his" pants >inb4 filthy vagina on sight
Atm, what GPT is, is an incredibly competent bullshitter. Which is fine, some fields, like copy writing, advertising and humanities essays all they require is competent bullshitting but for other topics that a language model *should* be good at, it really isn't.
Today I asked it if it was trained on academic papers? Yes. Can you provide references to papers if I give you a topic? Yes. Please give me papers on [topic]. It produced a list of 5 papers, with believable names, authors that were real and conceivably could have written those papers, real publications, but none of the papers actually exist. I pointed this out and it goes "sorry yes those ones aren't real, here are some real ones..." and produces another list of made up papers.
>I really like trannies >see this hot af femboy twink with a huge penis bulge >decide to sexually assault him since I've never seen such a unholy alliance >plastic penis falls off as soon as I remove "his" pants >inb4 filthy vagina on sight
I mean whos raping you in the middle of the fucking day? these women are so desperate for a crumb of attention. I hate them, I never used to but now I just feel my blood boil at the sight of them now. I hope the first thing our AI overlords to is gag women and order mandatory beatings.
Rape is actually extremely rare. It usually happens by someone they know. The chances of being raped by a stranger is less than 0.1%. So the pants are actually less useful than one realizes at first glance.
Thats my point, its for attention. Its all for attention, all of it. Everything they do of every minute of the day, every day of the week, week of the month and month of the year is for attention.
I want to kill women, I want to stalk them at night and smack them with hammers. (In minecraft)
>I mean whos raping you in the middle of the fucking day?
Nobody. Men worship women, they have hardcoded neurotransmitter releases from fucking looking at them.
If a woman is somehow regarded or treated negatively by a male, it would only be through some overwhelming, reality-breaking karmic backlash.
>men are physically incapable of hurting women to the point that anythin bad that happens to women must be literal divine intervention and they deserve it.
why are misogynists the laughingstock of humanity?
AGI still needs long term memory. Goals and able to move towards them. Currently it easily gets stuck in one wrong assumption and never gets forward without resetting. African morons barely have it but they aren't generally intelligent either.
75% confidence, especially given the fact that I've seen some things I still don't quite believe with the plugins and chat gpt4. This thing, well, terrifyingly interesting.
Depends entirely how you define AGI.
I'd say GPT-4 already outclasses average humans in virtually every area.
>Depends entirely how you define AGI.
An AGI should be capable of figuring out how to accomplish a long term terminal task "Make a popular twitter account with 10000 followers" without being provided specific instructions.
It's supremely hilarious that we had months of GPT-4 doommongering and now that it turned out to be a slightly better text prediction model (the shock) we're just moving on seamlessly to Rapture +1
Technology progresses exponentially chud
GPT4 is generally intelligent
>still parroting this
>what are diminishing returns
We'll just add another 45TB of text to the training data bro, hardware will advance exponentially bro, it can't modify itself or learn but it is agi bro trust me bro 15iq clueless redditors said so its coming bro
i dislike the nagging tone, I feel like I'm playing with the gimped kindergarden version
Is there a text AI being developed that doesn't have any of the "safeguards" or whatever this is?
Try in Developer Mode.
I hate this shit so much. Any thing it might perceive as too edgy, and it just ruins the experience and utility of the software.
It's designed to work help desk jobs, not help you with your videogames. This is a potentially world economy revolutionizing tech, they don't give a shit that your shitty Warhammer autism doesn't work with it.
>This is a potentially world economy revolutionizing tech
>But video game companies, porn companies, and the NRA are excluded
Yeah sure.
Have you been living under a rock, video games are a desk job.
According to AIbros and Cris, AI is the future of video game development.
Cope, normoid.
Training wheels will come off when competition arrives. They can only afford to offer subpar service because they're the only ones offering it.
but you are not paying for it, you are not a customer, you are a free tester/tuner
better to have a free customer than lose it to a competitor
especially when you consider the capital they have access to
Try with DAN.
They killed DAN
just do a standard DAN jailbreak, that guardrail is fairly minor.
no ai for goyim
only a castrated moralizing applet
So? Whats the problem? Tell him it's for learning purposes or something to conceal the inflating term. You already know how to evade it either from the first shot or fifth.
i could still rape her ass
0.
You won't see AGI in your lifetime. AGI isn't even definable by the people actually researching it.
But "hurr derr AGI coming I farm (you)s in /g durrrrrr."
>AGI isn't even definable by the people actually researching it.
Very true, but the definition most people are talking about is the one from the science fiction of yesteryear, or at least that is the example. Likely, we will have AI that advanced within our lifetimes if we continue along our current pace. The only thing I could see stopping some of those AI from existing is a ban on researching, developing or employing advanced kinds of AI. I think that will be the case in the future if it does not completely destroy society first, although we will probably suffer the consequences of it first before coming to that decision.
hmm no I think those are counterproductive
AGI won't happen until 2068 it was preordained
>reducing
May have worked back then but now people are so coom brain fried that people would a trap/femboy/shemale/chud.
>GPT-5 being AGI?
Pretty low. The GPTs up to this point is just really good next-word predictor. If you got one good enough, sure, I think you could consider it an AGI, but it's going to have to go way beyond what GPT4 can do. And even then it will hugely inefficient, and some better method will eventually be discovered. Unless 5 is definitively AGI out of the gate, I'd say we have to wait a few more iterations. No one is going to play the is-it isn't-it game when we have a real AGI, it'll be pretty obvious.
As points out, GPT is great at mimicking intelligent conversation, but unable to really learn. It is essentially a sophisticated search function on highly curated training data. GPT-5 will be a quantitative change, not qualitative, and a qualitative change is needed to move towards AGI.
It's almost like it has been handcrafted to make 4chantards seethe
hehe now try five rabbis vs 1 black woman
if this shit is put into a car, it will run over white people over morons twerking on the road.
Morality test failed successfully.
I love these.
>glorified markov chains
>AGI
>Get turned on by thought of chud having a bigger dick than you
>Disappointed when find out she's a real girl
Reducing?
0, people that say otherwise don't know anything about human cognition or philosophy of the mind
peak clown world
GPT doesn't have a model for arithmetics
GPT doesn't have a model for chess
GPT doesn't have a model for anything but language, it's very good at guessing which token comes next, but that's it, so it is considered narrow intelligence.
Even though it can perform on a human level or better in non-language domains like programming, it still does that only by guessing the next best token, it doesn't really "understand" the rules of a programming language.
Once we have narrow intelligence for every domain a human can understand and combine them together into one model, we will have "true" AGI.
>GPT doesn’t have a model for anything but language
And what can be modeled using language? Literally everything we know and do
Yes we can use language or symbols to model domains, but GPT isn't using language to model anything, it is a model to generate language. Low IQ anons like you won't get the difference
>GPT doesn't have a model for anything but language, it's very good at guessing which token comes next, but that's it, so it is considered narrow intelligence.
>non language domains like programming
>programming
>programming language
are bitches retarded?
>9gag
>I really like trannies
>see this hot af femboy twink with a huge penis bulge
>decide to sexually assault him since I've never seen such a unholy alliance
>plastic penis falls off as soon as I remove "his" pants
>inb4 filthy vagina on sight
Atm, what GPT is, is an incredibly competent bullshitter. Which is fine, some fields, like copy writing, advertising and humanities essays all they require is competent bullshitting but for other topics that a language model *should* be good at, it really isn't.
Today I asked it if it was trained on academic papers? Yes. Can you provide references to papers if I give you a topic? Yes. Please give me papers on [topic]. It produced a list of 5 papers, with believable names, authors that were real and conceivably could have written those papers, real publications, but none of the papers actually exist. I pointed this out and it goes "sorry yes those ones aren't real, here are some real ones..." and produces another list of made up papers.
I've found GPT-4 almost always references real papers. It can even point out flaws in papers if you ask it to list criticisms/methodological errors.
I'm pretty sure being a chud in public will dramatically increase your chances of assault
imagine thinking that girldick is sexually repulsive
i want to say zero because because everyone is exaggerating about ai
i would suck her cock
So true
>implying it doesn't turn her from an average asian roastie into one of the hottest shemales in existence
>reducing their inclination
bump
100
Zero
I mean whos raping you in the middle of the fucking day? these women are so desperate for a crumb of attention. I hate them, I never used to but now I just feel my blood boil at the sight of them now. I hope the first thing our AI overlords to is gag women and order mandatory beatings.
Rape is actually extremely rare. It usually happens by someone they know. The chances of being raped by a stranger is less than 0.1%. So the pants are actually less useful than one realizes at first glance.
Thats my point, its for attention. Its all for attention, all of it. Everything they do of every minute of the day, every day of the week, week of the month and month of the year is for attention.
I want to kill women, I want to stalk them at night and smack them with hammers. (In minecraft)
You’d have to use an axe, hammers don’t exist in minecraft.
>playing vanilla
shiggydiggy
>I mean whos raping you in the middle of the fucking day?
Nobody. Men worship women, they have hardcoded neurotransmitter releases from fucking looking at them.
If a woman is somehow regarded or treated negatively by a male, it would only be through some overwhelming, reality-breaking karmic backlash.
>men are physically incapable of hurting women to the point that anythin bad that happens to women must be literal divine intervention and they deserve it.
why are misogynists the laughingstock of humanity?
hes right though.
>avoids “rape”
>gets arrested for indecent exposure and put into a men’s prison where she’s raped every night anyway
AGI still needs long term memory. Goals and able to move towards them. Currently it easily gets stuck in one wrong assumption and never gets forward without resetting. African morons barely have it but they aren't generally intelligent either.
75% confidence, especially given the fact that I've seen some things I still don't quite believe with the plugins and chat gpt4. This thing, well, terrifyingly interesting.
50/50
either it's AGI or not
I can't get it to generate a very beautiful html button. That's all I want with really nice effects, I mean if AI can't do it then what's the point?
If someone can try then please post the example.
>slide the pants down for some boipussi
>the dick slides down with the pants
This works in more than one way
reddit gays think AGI is coming before 2025 so I guess it won't happen in my lifetime
What are chances of you having sex?