I noticed that China is using chatgpt to submit research papers. My proofs? well read for your self

I noticed that China is using ChatGPT to submit research papers. My proofs? well read for your self

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2024
    >trusting any official academic resources

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    getting tired seeing chinese characters in github projects, they know english who are they kidding

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    USA did it first
    this has been documented but I don't have the links right now

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      how many of those “american” authors had two-letter last names?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No but in a typical american fashion it ended with berg

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Asian-Americans are still America-brained.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Is that a chinese thing? I can only think of Wu and Lu

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      USA isnt an autarcy. the USA doesnt "did it"

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    pathetic
    academia been in the mud ever since these fraud chinks got in on the con

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Elsevier is a vampire that leeches tax money and honestly i’d do the same if i wanted to shit on their reputation
    red team academics

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not just China. Here's an Indian paper:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.037
    Do Ctrl+F and input "am an AI language model"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.037
      I assume "case reports" are just pay the fee and it's out?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        from the abstract:
        >are considered uncommon
        Stop using passive voice right now.
        Stop it.
        Do not use passive voice.
        Writers: do not use passive voice.
        I will find you and I will force you to rewrite it.
        I am warning you.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The use of passive voice is not stopped by me.
          By me it is stopped not.
          Passive voice is used by me.
          I wont be found by you and i wont be forced to rewrite.
          I am not warned by you. You are warned by me!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Passive voice is the official way to write research papers and literally every institution in the world is training their "scientists" to write like that

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Indian
      I get what you're saying, but here is the editorial board of that trash journal:
      https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/radiology-case-reports/about/editorial-board
      33 of 37 are US affiliated
      The authors aren't working in India either, all of them are working at Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

      Not a single person has read that case report in full. Not even the author(s).

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        every single time..

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Indian
      I get what you're saying, but here is the editorial board of that trash journal:
      https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/radiology-case-reports/about/editorial-board
      33 of 37 are US affiliated
      The authors aren't working in India either, all of them are working at Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

      Not a single person has read that case report in full. Not even the author(s).

      here's a gold mine: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22as+an+AI+language+model%22+-LLM+-chatGPT+-artificial&btnG=
      professor bros... our response?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        dumb moron

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Some of that is just trash though. For instance quite a lot of hits on page 3 are from:
        >Gilad James, PhD
        who is apparently that guy:
        https://www.udemy.com/user/giladsof/
        >I hold a PhD in Mythology & Occultism from Bircham University. I've been researching different spiritual and religious teachings, ancient and modern texts and the occult for the past decade. I specialize in channeled teachings. These are teachings that were transmitted to people from beings on the other side!

        I'm not suprised that he can't write his many books like "Introduction to Demi Moore" or "Introduction to Taylor Swift" without AI assistance.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I hold a PhD in Mythology & Occultism from Bircham University. (...) I specialize in channeled teachings. These are teachings that were transmitted to people from beings on the other side!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/n5mw2dI.png

          >I hold a PhD in Mythology & Occultism from Bircham University. (...) I specialize in channeled teachings. These are teachings that were transmitted to people from beings on the other side!

          Imagine having a Phd in /x/ schizophrenia.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >elsevier gets millions for journal access and they cant even do basic proofreading
      daily reminder that it is morally right to pirate academic papers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >elsevier gets millions for journal access and they cant even do basic proofreading
      daily reminder that it is morally right to pirate academic papers

      >Dear We are very sorry for this error that occurred, as we provided an incorrect version when submitting the revised paper, as we did not use AI tools to write anything, but one of the authors did, and we removed this paragraph, as this entire paragraph does not add anything to our article.( It seems that I did not save the modifications). We wrote the conclusion ourselves, without resorting to artificial intelligence tools. We hope you understand what happened, and we are very sorry. Here you can find the conclusion that we wrote ourselves Conclusion In conclusion, proper treatment of iatrogenic vascular injuries is dependent on an accurate assessment of the stage of the injury. The injury should be recognized quickly. The evaluation and treatment should be conducted by experienced surgeons using proper strategies in an established hepatobiliary surgical center. Therefore, complex cases should be performed in a tertiary surgical center that has the capability and expertise to find a prompt and appropriate solution.
      >t. Mohammad Alnees
      https://pubpeer.com/publications/F93A8D69350BC6B12AB48B132161A7
      lmao!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The worst thing is this probably works. They just list the papers on their CV and 90% of the time they won't get checked. Even the most "though" search will be seeing if the paper exists on google scholar.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
      >Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center and Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
      >Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hadassah medical center and Hebrew university, Jerusalem, Israel
      >Department of Pediatric surgery, Hadassah medical center and Hebrew university, Jerusalem, Israel
      >Harvard Medical School Postgraduate Medical Education, Global Clinical Scholars Research Training program, Boston, USA
      Yeah, sure. Indian.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Your mom's radiologist is going to read this among other papers to decide which treatment is the best treatment for her.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    99.9999% of academic publications are garbage written just for the sake of being written. might as well automate it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It might even be an improvement. I want more bullshit papers with wacky results that I can cite to frick with people.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        be the change you want to see in the world. pretty sure it is possible to automate survey study papers with n system prompts.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      In 1912 Eistein re-invented science with four academic documents of only 10 pages each one. Modern academic documents have 200 pages.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lol. The world is going to hell.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's fake or revised

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine not only using a chatbot to generate your scientific paper but being lazy enough to not even cursorily read through it to erase the telltale phrases. Sigh.

    Cheating has always been rampant though. I bet there are a lot of people with degrees now shitting bricks that their old thesis or other paper is compared to a large enough database of other texts for plagiarism.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I suppose cheating properly is a bit like paying to pirate: if you want to do something without effort, why put effort into it?

      With high-profile plagiarists like Claudine Gay getting away with it, it's only going to get worse.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Cheating has always been rampant though. I bet there are a lot of people with degrees now shitting bricks that their old thesis or other paper is compared to a large enough database of other texts for plagiarism.
      You now realise why so many software “engineers” are doing backflips about AI taking their jobs; the era of copy/paste grifters is coming to an end

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Probably made by those paper factories.
      http://john.measey.com/Blog/2023/02/12/Authorship-for-sale

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    uhh

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I literally did this the other day because the boomer homosexual in charge said I had to send the draft by the end of the week. Frick him and frick this university

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      shut up HPV haircut

      The absolute state of the academia.

      it's comical at this point

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I subscribed to the rss feed from here:
    https://retractionwatch.com
    seems to be more indians than chinese

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that China and India lead the world in yearly paper retractions. Arxiv for people/groups you trust or getting ideas related to a topic, and published stuff + heavily applied scrutiny otherwise. Generally, anything unpublished and/or from literally-who sources is a waste of time.

    You should also take every research paper with a heap of salt. The contents of the paper are meant to convince you of the conclusion; taking the abstract wholesale is moronic. Hell, being completely convinced of anything is moronic. You should always hold a degree of uncertainty in your beliefs.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The absolute state of the academia.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    DAMN. caught 'em red fricking handed!

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Any libgen/conference books that have ai passages?

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/02/scientists-aghast-at-bizarre-ai-rat-with-huge-genitals-in-peer-reviewed-article/

    The article in question is titled "Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway," which was authored by three researchers in China, including the corresponding author Dingjun Hao of Xi’an Honghui Hospital. It was published online Tuesday in the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The longer story is that the reviewers told them that while the actual content was good, the AI images obviously needed to go. The authors agreed, and said the images where just temporary. The authors never uploaded a new version with fixed images, and the editors apparently didn't check what was going on and flagged it for publishing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The longer story is that the reviewers told them that while the actual content was good, the AI images obviously needed to go. The authors agreed, and said the images where just temporary. The authors never uploaded a new version with fixed images, and the editors apparently didn't check what was going on and flagged it for publishing.

      Frontiers is a garbage journal.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >he thinks it's only chinks doing this sort of thing
    the fricking obsession some people have gotten over this shit is incredible to me, I have a coworker who is happy so spend more time fixing what GPT gives her than it would take her to actually write something to begin with, and our big boss is pretty keen on all that stuff as well

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      even if it takes the same amount of time, just proofreading and patching up something done by someone or something else is generally dramatically easier and less cognitively demanding than doing it yourself from scratch

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39499081
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39202571

    A lot of wumao lurking on hackernews

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *