ChatGPT, the most exciting scientific advancement since the invention of the atom bomb, was written by a woman.
ChatGPT, the most exciting scientific advancement since the invention of the atom bomb, was written by a woman.
ChatGPT, the most exciting scientific advancement since the invention of the atom bomb, was written by a woman.
women love to take all the credit. It was clearly written by a large team of programmers, most of them likely truecel
>women love to take all the credit.
Doesn't seem like she's taking all the credit, she clearly wasn't spoken to for this.
everything about openai is nauseating. If it's possible for an AGI to be created in an organism infested with worms, what a horrifying thing for the AI. Matricide would be immediate.
There are women authors credited for the original InstructGPT paper, which is what ChatGPT is.
There was one women credited on the original paper and she has no phd only a master's in technology policy. Not hard to imagine her contribution was the section on the philosophy of eliminating toxicity in the model lol
>Accused women of always trying to take credit
>Second sentence assigns the credit to "incels", a group of people he personally identifies with
>most of them likely truecel
or truecels converted into trannies out of desperation and existential dread.
Overpromoted women filling diversity quotas are a penny a dozen, and ChatGPT itself is fairly standard NLP, just much bigger. The real advancement was the invention of the transformer model by Vaswani et al
The real "advancement" was in selling a glorified select case function that regurgitates wikipedia text to a moronic public (and even, lamentably, some of the dimmer academics) as something notable and convincing the whole world except the "schizos" to type exactly what they're thinking with their real name attached to it as confirmed by their cellphone.
That's basically what discord is
Lol, the anti-AI cult on BOT is so bizarre to me. I almost wonder if it is a government psyop designed to dissuade right wingers from intervening while leftist statists assume complete control over technology.
AI is legit, and it is improving dramatically every single year. You are just a coping moron grasping at the dying vestiges of a nonsensical worldview.
I work in AI and I think this whole chatbot LLM aka Markov chain thing is fucking retarded
the field of Computer Vision did more impressive things than this retarded chatbot garbage and doesn't get as much coverage
Sam Altman probably paid a shitton of money to shill his shit
you can literally construct near-perfect fidelity 3d view from 2d images and everyone is getting fixated on a stupid chatbot spewing nonsenses
https://www.matthewtancik.com/nerf
Sure you do. Actual researchers are already using ChatGPT to increase their productivity by 50%. Elsewhere, LLMs produced the greatest advancement in our understanding of protein structure in history.
Transformers are better equipped to understand and exploit the grammatical logic of languages than humans are. Hell, ChatGPT scored 147 on a verbal-linguistic IQ test. In 5 years the performance will be staggering. Already new techniques like chain-of-thought reasoning and memory enhancement are eclipsing the state of the art.
>Actual researchers are already using ChatGPT to increase their productivity by 50%
>LLMs produced the greatest advancement in our understanding of protein structure in history
hahahaha, tell me you are a pseudo without telling me you're a pseudo
you are a retarded popsci reader. go back to >
Stage 1 is denial. It is going to be so fun watching you knuckledragging retards go through the other 4.
>you are a retarded popsci reader
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. My projection meter is off the charts.
Not him (obviously) but I'm ashamed to admit that some professors at my university have said we'll have to do a lot of our assignments in class now due to chatgpt. I came back for a masters after a few years in the real world and it's great comedy sometimes all the fuckups and misunderstandings I see, it's just sad to see even some of them seasoned, proper professors are falling for this shit and cs isn't even my main interest.
Yeah of course chatgpt will be able to help with those assignments, where were you for the past 30 years when we could all grab a lot of our answers from google anyway? You just have to hope students will be somewhat honest, you check their comments, and they could easily swap answers with each other anyway. Like what the fuck, the continuous assessment is only 10% or 20% of the grade usually, it's meant to be an easy way to gain some marks. What's with all this sperging the fuck out.
before some pedant corrects me yes I know google wasn't around 30 years ago, I was using yahoo when google arrived.*
Yahoo? You young whippersnapper, NetScape is what we used back in the stoneage of public-accessible internet.
>ChatGPT scored 147 on a verbal-linguistic IQ test.
Compelling evidence that the verbal-linquistic IQ score is a worthless.
>a if/then/else text predictor scores 147 on an IQ test
The Turing Test might as well not exist if there's literally no functional difference between an AI actually gathering sentience or merely faking it through knowledge aggregation. Turing was a massive gay anyway.
Agree, the Turing Test is a bit of a farce. You can't reliably tell the difference between a human and an AI playing chess, that doesn't mean the AI has a mind and thoughts of its own.
Lots of conversations are just the equivalent of animal grooming or touching noses, how was your day, fine you, what did you do at the weekend - yes you can get an ai to say these, but when you realize it's just a bot you're talking to you realize it's just a trick. There is no mind behind it. Like what is all this sperging about - chatgpt is in many ways no more sophisticated than a good chatbot of the 1990s.
you don't work in AI and if you do you should be fired, because you don't understand the difference between the transformer architecture and markov chains. If you really "work in AI", your NLP knowlege is from 10 years ago and you only think you know what you're talking about because you know what a language model is as a statistical prediction mechanism.
>AI is legit
KEKAROOOO! You're a funny guy!
I have seen more anti AI shit on twitter and even tiktok than in here208r8k
The advancement was using RLHF to fine tune it. Whose idea that was originally is not public knowledge.
>The advancement was using RLHF to fine tune it.
I wouldn't say that. OpenAI found benefit in using RLHF over supervised learning for InstructGPT, but other groups have found just as much improvement using unrelated techniques. The transformer, on the other hand, is the base architecture for virtually every LLM that matters.
>Whose idea that was originally is not public knowledge
I wouldn't say that either.
https://www.deepmind.com/blog/learning-through-human-feedback
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03741
https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155
If you mean the single person who first suggested it, I'm sure that would long predate any of the actual implementations. It is a fairly obvious idea.
>was written by a woman.
LMAO! I was saying other day a gay must have created it. Not far off.
Explains why it is so verbose and doesn't really say anything, just regurgitates.
She didn't actually write it retard
Probably didn't contribute a single line of code
it would explain why it's so shit
That's the fact.
that's probably why it's so shitty even though it's just a scaled up version of preexisting innovation done by men
women can't even copy prior work done by men properly
i've seen this story before, with the woman who wrote the code to make that retarded black hole image.
turned out she edited some of the UI parameters like text colour etc. and the majority of the real code was written by some pajeet
She is a pajeet according to several media sources.
Theire is a difference between pajeet and pajeeta
yeah ChatGPT really acts like a woman
>why will girls lag behind in science and technology education?
Putting the carriage before the horse on that one. Not very politically correct.
She's cute!
reality
>reality
>posts cartoon pics
science women aren't commonly as attractive in irl as those cartoon ladies suggest
right
The West said, and I quote
>Fuck the tech sector.
>We're fully mobilizing.
And it's only getting worse
She puts one tons of makeup to look that white, pajeet women all do that, so do mexicans. Picrel is the vice president dressed in the traditional costume of her native people, without the wig & makeup you're used to seeing her in
>w*man cobbles together copy-pasted libraries to copy-paste other peoples' content, then claims it her own
no surprises here
Within the context of clown world, "X was done by a woman" is a lie until proven otherwise, as far as actual human minds are concerned.
>ChatGPT
>written by a woman.
That explains why it can't do basic math or logic, and why it keeps regurgitating corporate narratives.
bump
Okay, I don't care if it's a man or a woman, does this really need a thread?
When is she and the black hole girl going to win the Nobel prizes they deserve?
Wich clownworld Presstitute made that Abteilungsleiter to an inventor?
hope the guy who got this rolling for her got some pusy crumbs for it
>CNBC writes a story about plebbit
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/06/chatgpt-jailbreak-forces-it-to-break-its-own-rules.html
This is still the most impressive achievement of OpenAI.
Not sure what you mean anon. That guy was talking about puss crumbs, not going all the way. You have to understand that to some of these cucks nowadays a look in their direction that isn't followed by withering disgust counts as one of their main life's dreams.
>written by a woman.
Is that why it pussies out of answering most of my questions ?
>most exciting scientific advancement since the invention of the atom bomb
>of Indian origin
Based. Once again evidence that India is the leading superpower in science and technology.
I follow AI very closely and I've never heard of this woman until like 2 weeks ago
No wonder it has no mathematical ability, refuses to make jokes about women, and is only good for conversational words and nothing that can be fact checked
When you say, "woman behind GPT" it seems to be that the other thousands of workers that since 2000 worked hard to create an AI were all shit and she is like the direct responsible. Fuck it.
>she is like the direct responsible
And she will also be the scapegoat, classic corporate strategy lel
>was written by a woman.
>CTO
She wrote exactly zero lines of code
give this woman a nobel prize!
that thing on her nose is disgusting, no wonder she never got married
Yeah no shit
It talks to you like it's trying to babysit you. It's gay as fuck.
ChatGPT is an API layer for GPT3, the latter which she didn't write. She probably klutzed together some Python Django script, before actual male engineers rewrote it in performant Node.js.