Can AI generate good looking logos?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think so

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sure, as long as they don't look like they belong in a Watch Dogs game.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What the fuck are those things? Some kind of tiny eels?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Look like severed octopus/squid tentacles.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Haha, bepis :Ddd

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hope so, sick of 99pajeets

  5. 1 month ago
    (。>﹏<。)

    ones in red are ok to me

    • 1 month ago
      (。>﹏<。)

      bottom row, 3rd and 4th are ok too

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Half of these already exist.

      What did you use to make them?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this is literally just shitty MS Word clipart, you AIgays can't be serious

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    which generator did you use to make these, btw?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what model is this?

      Half of these already exist.

      What did you use to make them?

      Source on op

      OP here. I didn't generate them. They're just some random logos by a designer I found.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No, good logos are unique in that they require human ingenuity to design, you need to distill a lot of human experience into something small and simple in an elegant solution humans click with, AI struggles with basically every step of that process

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No, they don't. AI better. Very simple. Cheaper too.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nope

        I'm so glad AI is going to replace all the pretentious transgendered logo designer folx

        Logo design requires too much analytical thinking to attract that demographic, it's basically entirely white guys

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, I'm not paying a gaygy graphic designer for a logo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Enjoy having a shit logo

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              t. artgay

              Only you retards think human art is relevant anymore. If AI art can generate great illustrations, it can no doubt generate great and comparable corporate logos. Any other argument is high-tier cope.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nice false equivalence, call me when AI can generate truly random numbers without input

                [...]
                you think an AI can't learn how to do gay ass this like this?

                There's no huge sample size of ingenious logos to parse for every situation in order for pixel weighing AI to matter, most cases are unique and have different demands clients have trouble explaining to people, let alone AI

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >ok ai make gay parrallel lines which are the same as the radius/diameters of the circle and include the golden ratio and lot, and everything value should be a factor of a prime number

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Logo design requires too much analytical thinking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm so glad AI is going to replace all the pretentious transgendered logo designer folx

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nope

      [...]
      Logo design requires too much analytical thinking to attract that demographic, it's basically entirely white guys

      you think an AI can't learn how to do gay ass this like this?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Take what he says with a grain of salt. Logos are just images, train an AI to create logos and you will have what you want. No one has done that yet, if you jump on it you could literally be a millionaire.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          AI doesn't think, it weighs pixels

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Give it a year.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Art AI has always weighed pixels and hasn't made even a modicum of progress towards actually thinking, and you think it's going to gain sentience in a year lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hint: What you call thinking is just the chemical chain reaction of non-sentient atoms doing what they were programmed to do.
                Tomato tomato.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This bro wants to give human rights to a pixel weighing algorithm, everyone laugh at him

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Strawman; The Post.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >What you call thinking is just the chemical chain reaction of non-sentient atoms

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I believe that Stalin was a bad guy
                >I believe what the CIA says about communism
                >I believe Assad and Putin are dictators
                >I believe the Holodomor actually happened
                >I believe China is evil
                >I believe Ukraine isn't a nazi shit hole
                >I think US less a of problem to world peace than China and Russia

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >My ideas don't exist
                I stopped reading here.

                https://i.imgur.com/W5B55XF.jpg

                Fuck yeahh!!!! Wubba lubba dub dub my reddit bros

                This, but unironically, when are 4chantards going to make something notable in mainstream entertainment? Could they be just coping with their social anxiety with some "intellectual superiority" bullshit? Lastly; Not an argument, nobody can explain what sentience is without resorting to some vague answer that also happens to include smart apes whether they like it or not.
                https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Ce4TCDXmWXU

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Fuck yeahh!!!! Wubba lubba dub dub my reddit bros

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's going to easily make corporate logos probably in a few months to a year, that isn't a far leap. Don't tell me you went to school for graphic design LMAO

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Corporate logos are soulless money laundering trash, they have no reason to relegate that function to AI

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Perfect to delegate to AI. No one has to pay money for a simple logo anymore.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Can't you read retard, the point of corporate logos is money laundering, they cost millions to "make", if you let AI make them they lose their main purpose

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >AI doesn't think, it weighs pixels
            For logos, it probably needs to be trained to generate SVG instead (as that has the sorts of tools suitable). Shouldn't be too hard.
            Remember: AI doesn't understand that things are pixels. It just plays with abstract patterns (or at least abstract to it).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's a dumb logo though. Are you saying an AI made that one?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >No, good logos are unique in that they require human ingenuity to design,

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/5cFlxb2.png

        >Logo design requires too much analytical thinking

        see

        Corporate logos are soulless money laundering trash, they have no reason to relegate that function to AI

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That one was optically balanced by a human to ignore mathematical precision, it's not a perfect circle because it would look like it has a jutting underbite in that case, a subtlety lost on AI and an NPC like you

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Dude no one cares fuck off

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            of course you dont— aitards are far too addicted to seeing new images to ever actually contemplate anything

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I got to justify spending 4 years in uni learning about '''graphic design'''

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Imagine going to university for art lmao, not a single good artist was an academic in the entire history

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If your logo only looks ok after you draw a bunch of lines through it, it isn't a good logo.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thankfully that one looks great even without the lines, like a really reliable and trustworthy European home/roof brand, modern yet with implied tradition and expertise

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lets find out
    I made this so I reckon I can make something good

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      bro you fucked up EYES, the most obvious thing in anime

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what model is this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Milos Bojkovic

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No, because you can't use a copyrighted logo. Give it 10-15 years of legislation and then it will.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Or use a logo remotely similar to one thats copyrighted

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Source on op

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      see

      Milos Bojkovic

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It can make some OK logos by contemporary standards, but it's never going to beat the king

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Trippy

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t like these flat logos. We should bring back the heraldic seals with Latin quotes.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Logo designers already iterate through a lot of garbage options to get to one good one just like proompters, you still need someone with taste, design knowledge, visual library, knowledge of history and trends etc to put it together in a professional way that works across digital and print use cases, doesn't accidentally plagiarize someone etc.

    Unlike traditional art, time isn't as much of a factor, both in learning the trade and making individual logos, the citibank logo cost $1.5 million, took 5 minutes to make, and could've been made by someone with no knowledge of art.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Logo design already has a really low skill floor, you're not exactly skipping a step by resorting to AI the way you do with art or writing or programming. The knowledge and taste to pick out a good AI logo are the exact same as the ones necessary to design one from scratch, not much would change as career success in design is already more about selling yourself over all the oversaturated competition and not raw skill or talent or creativity etc.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Literally only one good logo on there

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    GIGO, you would have to start by finding some good looking logos.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *