No, good logos are unique in that they require human ingenuity to design, you need to distill a lot of human experience into something small and simple in an elegant solution humans click with, AI struggles with basically every step of that process
Only you retards think human art is relevant anymore. If AI art can generate great illustrations, it can no doubt generate great and comparable corporate logos. Any other argument is high-tier cope.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nice false equivalence, call me when AI can generate truly random numbers without input
[...]
you think an AI can't learn how to do gay ass this like this?
There's no huge sample size of ingenious logos to parse for every situation in order for pixel weighing AI to matter, most cases are unique and have different demands clients have trouble explaining to people, let alone AI
5 months ago
Anonymous
>ok ai make gay parrallel lines which are the same as the radius/diameters of the circle and include the golden ratio and lot, and everything value should be a factor of a prime number
Take what he says with a grain of salt. Logos are just images, train an AI to create logos and you will have what you want. No one has done that yet, if you jump on it you could literally be a millionaire.
Art AI has always weighed pixels and hasn't made even a modicum of progress towards actually thinking, and you think it's going to gain sentience in a year lmao
5 months ago
Anonymous
Hint: What you call thinking is just the chemical chain reaction of non-sentient atoms doing what they were programmed to do.
Tomato tomato.
5 months ago
Anonymous
This bro wants to give human rights to a pixel weighing algorithm, everyone laugh at him
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Strawman; The Post.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>What you call thinking is just the chemical chain reaction of non-sentient atoms
5 months ago
Anonymous
>I believe that Stalin was a bad guy >I believe what the CIA says about communism >I believe Assad and Putin are dictators >I believe the Holodomor actually happened >I believe China is evil >I believe Ukraine isn't a nazi shit hole >I think US less a of problem to world peace than China and Russia
5 months ago
Anonymous
>My ideas don't exist
I stopped reading here.
https://i.imgur.com/W5B55XF.jpg
Fuck yeahh!!!! Wubba lubba dub dub my reddit bros
This, but unironically, when are 4chantards going to make something notable in mainstream entertainment? Could they be just coping with their social anxiety with some "intellectual superiority" bullshit? Lastly; Not an argument, nobody can explain what sentience is without resorting to some vague answer that also happens to include smart apes whether they like it or not.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Ce4TCDXmWXU
5 months ago
Anonymous
Fuck yeahh!!!! Wubba lubba dub dub my reddit bros
5 months ago
Anonymous
It's going to easily make corporate logos probably in a few months to a year, that isn't a far leap. Don't tell me you went to school for graphic design LMAO
5 months ago
Anonymous
Corporate logos are soulless money laundering trash, they have no reason to relegate that function to AI
5 months ago
Anonymous
Perfect to delegate to AI. No one has to pay money for a simple logo anymore.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Can't you read retard, the point of corporate logos is money laundering, they cost millions to "make", if you let AI make them they lose their main purpose
>AI doesn't think, it weighs pixels
For logos, it probably needs to be trained to generate SVG instead (as that has the sorts of tools suitable). Shouldn't be too hard.
Remember: AI doesn't understand that things are pixels. It just plays with abstract patterns (or at least abstract to it).
That one was optically balanced by a human to ignore mathematical precision, it's not a perfect circle because it would look like it has a jutting underbite in that case, a subtlety lost on AI and an NPC like you
Thankfully that one looks great even without the lines, like a really reliable and trustworthy European home/roof brand, modern yet with implied tradition and expertise
Logo designers already iterate through a lot of garbage options to get to one good one just like proompters, you still need someone with taste, design knowledge, visual library, knowledge of history and trends etc to put it together in a professional way that works across digital and print use cases, doesn't accidentally plagiarize someone etc.
Unlike traditional art, time isn't as much of a factor, both in learning the trade and making individual logos, the citibank logo cost $1.5 million, took 5 minutes to make, and could've been made by someone with no knowledge of art.
Logo design already has a really low skill floor, you're not exactly skipping a step by resorting to AI the way you do with art or writing or programming. The knowledge and taste to pick out a good AI logo are the exact same as the ones necessary to design one from scratch, not much would change as career success in design is already more about selling yourself over all the oversaturated competition and not raw skill or talent or creativity etc.
I think so
Sure, as long as they don't look like they belong in a Watch Dogs game.
What the fuck are those things? Some kind of tiny eels?
Look like severed octopus/squid tentacles.
Haha, bepis :Ddd
I hope so, sick of 99pajeets
ones in red are ok to me
bottom row, 3rd and 4th are ok too
Half of these already exist.
What did you use to make them?
this is literally just shitty MS Word clipart, you AIgays can't be serious
which generator did you use to make these, btw?
OP here. I didn't generate them. They're just some random logos by a designer I found.
No, good logos are unique in that they require human ingenuity to design, you need to distill a lot of human experience into something small and simple in an elegant solution humans click with, AI struggles with basically every step of that process
No, they don't. AI better. Very simple. Cheaper too.
Nope
Logo design requires too much analytical thinking to attract that demographic, it's basically entirely white guys
Yes, I'm not paying a gaygy graphic designer for a logo.
Enjoy having a shit logo
t. artgay
Only you retards think human art is relevant anymore. If AI art can generate great illustrations, it can no doubt generate great and comparable corporate logos. Any other argument is high-tier cope.
Nice false equivalence, call me when AI can generate truly random numbers without input
There's no huge sample size of ingenious logos to parse for every situation in order for pixel weighing AI to matter, most cases are unique and have different demands clients have trouble explaining to people, let alone AI
>ok ai make gay parrallel lines which are the same as the radius/diameters of the circle and include the golden ratio and lot, and everything value should be a factor of a prime number
>Logo design requires too much analytical thinking
I'm so glad AI is going to replace all the pretentious transgendered logo designer folx
you think an AI can't learn how to do gay ass this like this?
Take what he says with a grain of salt. Logos are just images, train an AI to create logos and you will have what you want. No one has done that yet, if you jump on it you could literally be a millionaire.
AI doesn't think, it weighs pixels
Give it a year.
Art AI has always weighed pixels and hasn't made even a modicum of progress towards actually thinking, and you think it's going to gain sentience in a year lmao
Hint: What you call thinking is just the chemical chain reaction of non-sentient atoms doing what they were programmed to do.
Tomato tomato.
This bro wants to give human rights to a pixel weighing algorithm, everyone laugh at him
>Strawman; The Post.
>What you call thinking is just the chemical chain reaction of non-sentient atoms
>I believe that Stalin was a bad guy
>I believe what the CIA says about communism
>I believe Assad and Putin are dictators
>I believe the Holodomor actually happened
>I believe China is evil
>I believe Ukraine isn't a nazi shit hole
>I think US less a of problem to world peace than China and Russia
>My ideas don't exist
I stopped reading here.
This, but unironically, when are 4chantards going to make something notable in mainstream entertainment? Could they be just coping with their social anxiety with some "intellectual superiority" bullshit? Lastly; Not an argument, nobody can explain what sentience is without resorting to some vague answer that also happens to include smart apes whether they like it or not.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Ce4TCDXmWXU
Fuck yeahh!!!! Wubba lubba dub dub my reddit bros
It's going to easily make corporate logos probably in a few months to a year, that isn't a far leap. Don't tell me you went to school for graphic design LMAO
Corporate logos are soulless money laundering trash, they have no reason to relegate that function to AI
Perfect to delegate to AI. No one has to pay money for a simple logo anymore.
Can't you read retard, the point of corporate logos is money laundering, they cost millions to "make", if you let AI make them they lose their main purpose
>AI doesn't think, it weighs pixels
For logos, it probably needs to be trained to generate SVG instead (as that has the sorts of tools suitable). Shouldn't be too hard.
Remember: AI doesn't understand that things are pixels. It just plays with abstract patterns (or at least abstract to it).
That's a dumb logo though. Are you saying an AI made that one?
>No, good logos are unique in that they require human ingenuity to design,
see
That one was optically balanced by a human to ignore mathematical precision, it's not a perfect circle because it would look like it has a jutting underbite in that case, a subtlety lost on AI and an NPC like you
Dude no one cares fuck off
of course you dont— aitards are far too addicted to seeing new images to ever actually contemplate anything
>I got to justify spending 4 years in uni learning about '''graphic design'''
Imagine going to university for art lmao, not a single good artist was an academic in the entire history
If your logo only looks ok after you draw a bunch of lines through it, it isn't a good logo.
Thankfully that one looks great even without the lines, like a really reliable and trustworthy European home/roof brand, modern yet with implied tradition and expertise
Lets find out
I made this so I reckon I can make something good
bro you fucked up EYES, the most obvious thing in anime
what model is this?
Milos Bojkovic
No, because you can't use a copyrighted logo. Give it 10-15 years of legislation and then it will.
>Or use a logo remotely similar to one thats copyrighted
Source on op
see
It can make some OK logos by contemporary standards, but it's never going to beat the king
Trippy
I don’t like these flat logos. We should bring back the heraldic seals with Latin quotes.
Logo designers already iterate through a lot of garbage options to get to one good one just like proompters, you still need someone with taste, design knowledge, visual library, knowledge of history and trends etc to put it together in a professional way that works across digital and print use cases, doesn't accidentally plagiarize someone etc.
Unlike traditional art, time isn't as much of a factor, both in learning the trade and making individual logos, the citibank logo cost $1.5 million, took 5 minutes to make, and could've been made by someone with no knowledge of art.
Logo design already has a really low skill floor, you're not exactly skipping a step by resorting to AI the way you do with art or writing or programming. The knowledge and taste to pick out a good AI logo are the exact same as the ones necessary to design one from scratch, not much would change as career success in design is already more about selling yourself over all the oversaturated competition and not raw skill or talent or creativity etc.
Literally only one good logo on there
GIGO, you would have to start by finding some good looking logos.