AI has proven that our brain is simply a result of chemical reactions, and our decisions have nothing to do with our consciousness.

AI has proven that our brain is simply a result of chemical reactions, and our decisions have nothing to do with our consciousness.
We are merely observers who observe human beings doing things on their own.
Split brain experiments proved this too

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >reactions

    What are chemicals and what are the causes? These are just effects.

    Informatics actually explains emergence and causes of intelligence much better than chemical psychology, it's applications was what allowed us to create machine intelligence and LLMs. It's why computer scientists and engineers created AI and psychologists are still working the roastie emotional damage helpdesk and behavioral economics to sell shit to the lowest common denominator of humans.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Informatics actually explains emergence and causes of intelligence much better than chemical psychology
      both of them explain it equally bad

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >equally bad
        Not sure i agree they're equally bad, modern psychology has existed for roughly 100 years and engineering even less so but has progressed immensely more than the former.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Moving faster in a direction away the goal is not progressing

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >we
    >cowards
    >etc

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, you realise that it's just watching a long movie

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI has proven that our brain is simply a result of chemical reactions
    It has not.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      OK it hasn't entirely, but what would make you change your mind?
      Organoid intelligence for me would be really interesting, it'd effectively be the equivalent of our fleshy creature selves but entirely lab grown

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        NTA, but actual intelligence and not machine/deep learning scripting

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You can't look at an apple to understand a rock. Materialism cannot explain itself. Some things cannot be scientifically isolated and tested. I don't say this as some woo woo fanatic. It is just common sense.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My god you are such a midwit.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What's your point?
    What am I supposed to use this information for to better my life?
    Sounds like bullshit to me I've trained my consciousness to a point I'm one step ahead of everyone in my vicinity.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI never proved anything other than that it does what humans programmed it to do.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    bhagavad gita basically says that god is the controller of the body, which is likened to a conditioned machine. our soul observes this process, deluded into thinking that it is this machine-body.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So everything I do is deterministic and I should just enjoy being a piece of shit cause it's not actually me doing the mean things?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    your first mistake is thinking there is a 'you' or an 'I' to begin with. the ego is the greatest illusion of all.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >self is le ego
      sigh, is this a glowBlack person raid?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >our decisions have nothing to do with our consciousness
    already debunked, look it up

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Talks to replica for 20 minutes
    >Omg the pinnacle of technology
    >Robots can do anything a human can do now
    Braindead

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In that case, could I get a new human? I think mine is defective.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI has proven
    Stopped reading.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is just processing statistics. It literally doesn't know anything.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is the stupid: any kind of truth claims necessitates the possibility of error, yet in a purely biological, deterministic universe reasoning can't be right or wrong because from the get go knowledge as proper isn't possible but rather neural processes that facilitate survival. In consequence we couldn't actually know if the realization of any truth actually comes from external reality (that can't be proven either with this model) or simply a monke brain doing his own stuff and believing falsehood for the sake of survival. It would be impossible.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *