AI Carreerpocalypse salt mining is upon us! Every artist in extreme meltdown and huffing pure copium that AI has just phased out an entire financial sector. POST SALT
AI Carreerpocalypse salt mining is upon us!
AI Carreerpocalypse salt mining is upon us! Every artist in extreme meltdown and huffing pure copium that AI has just phased out an entire financial sector. POST SALT
By far the most impressive technology I've ever seen on the internet and makes me think they'll take it away soon because it's too powerful.
>They'll take it away soon
You can't take it away. It's open source, it's already out there. Anyone can make their own model by crawling the world's public images.
They might try to copyright the derivative works but that will be extremely difficult to (1) prove and (2) hold it up in court.
>You can't take it away
you must be new here (earth). they've literally taken away everything that's a human right
means nothing if its not modular and can be run completely offline.
YAY let's celebrate this, instead of paying artists let's make copos even more rich
Think of the naggers and brown people! We need food to survive!
Pure fucking cope. Imagine spending your entire life in photoshop when someone can spit out higher quality images just typing in space opera 100 times.
>Pure fucking cope.
Lol. Imagine defending your obsolescence.
>Nobody gives a shit that a human didn't make it.
Yeah, they do. Most are distracted and attracted by the #shiny new novelty of it, but they will eventually get bored and wonder why they still feel as empty inside as before, if not more so.
Like everyone rejects Ikea tables and chairs in favour of authentic, handcrafted ones?
>Lol. Imagine defending your obsolescence.
Imagine that everyone can be replaced by AI, what do we do now? take Bill Gate's vaccines I suppose?
>let's make corpos even more rich
lol no this is also a big win for small to mediums sized businesse. instead of hiring a graphics designer just get some ai to do it for you in no time.
Learn to code.
>Learn to code.
Coding jobs are in queue for the Carreerpocalypse, there will be a sharp decline in demand in the next decaded.
Sorry leftoid CHUD, you should have learned something useful like genomics or applied math
ai is not going to do that? robots will replace all kinds of things, im sitting in front a robot right now kek
The vast majority of artists(that make it through schooling) are commie scum
Forgot pic
SEETHE ARTKEK AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You shouldn't have laughed at the nerds.
but drawfags are among the biggest nerds?
Meet Alpaca. It turns your stupid drawings into award winning masterpieces in a few minutes.
Link?
https://www.getalpaca.io/
Thank you
Craiyon can generate infinite happy merchants.
These must have taken you over 100 hours in photoshop each right?
reminds me of van Gogh's style.
you can kinda tell it's made by ai, it has this mimicking quality about it...kinda like when people redraw famous paintings in their own style...or a kind of collage quality
It won first place and will only get better. The crossbow has just replaced the longbow.
Couple of years ago peak of AI's ability was to draw deformed dogs on stuff. Now you can ask it for a superman on a toilet painted by Michelangelo and get solid results in seconds.
>superman on a toilet painted by Michelangelo
I need this.
ORIGINAL CONTENT NFT DO NOT STEAL
You're welcome. 🙂
You can kinda tell that most human art is made by someone with no talent, too. The award winning AI art is incredible. I want a print of it in my home.
What’s that website where you can put in a phrase and it generates images for you? I’ve seen some kek worthy shit from that too.
https://www.craiyon.com/ is a popular one people use. There's so many more in development and about to be released by the end of the year.
https://www.craiyon.com/
There are sites with better quality images but they are not free and mostly censored.
How is it that creative? Is it because nothing is new and we are piecing together the same parts over and over again?
It's working on a large (and I mean LARGE) databases of stuff that people already made, photos and so on. They let it teach itself how things look like from different angles, how shadows work, what makes face a face and so on. Remember that even complete randomness can be pretty creative: just look at shapes of rocks or patterns on tree bark.
I wonder if its able to place hidden meanings in the pictures, like geometry in the composition and other Da Vinci Codeish stuff or if you could let it reverse analyse say masonic architecture or those Denver murals and it spits out the meanings they put there.
>muh soul and creative expression
Pure fucking cope. Nobody gives a shit that a human didn't make it.
i don't think you understand what professional artists get paid for. a professional artist needs CONSISTENCY more than quality. so being able to generate generic webshit art is a fairly small part of the global art market
generic webshit art runs the world
exactly they'll be able to drown all corporations in the shitty "art work" the AI will spit out. and all the coping graphic designers will eat bullets
thass a Hispanicy one
Seethe.
I've been looking at shitty AI drawings too much to tell. Did you draw this or did you type in "shitty drawings stylized by picaso"? Either way it's fucking awful.
Hitler, cubist, line art that one was.
Here's anotherone
No way, Hitler was in Blade Runner?
>a man fighting for his people against the tide of the future
>a movie set in a dystopian future were the masses are majority non-white (chinese)
Hopperian life
there's some uncaniness in these types of pictures. It would look like a human drew the lines since they aren't properly measured, like someone inexperienced drawing by hand, but it has a stranger slight unnatural feel to it
Well to be fair Hopper is an artist known widely for his uncanny, quiet tension.
you realize that the poster you're replying to has no idea who edward hopper was or that the picture in question is a rendition in someone's style, yes?
Because modern AI lacks contextual information
A human artist drawing
would have something for her to stare at or turn away from. There would be some meaning in the image to explain why there is a subject and why the subject is doing something. Instead, being done by an AI, there is no meaning, there is no context.
In fact its a contextless amalgamation of prior human-created artwork assembled by the AI into something that superficially resembles human artwork.
Maybe this will change one day, but I think it will require AI that can understand context and an AI that can understand context might be very nearly human itself
I think you're wrong about the woman having an object to look at. It is meant to mimic Edward Hopper's style and because of that it is SUPPOSED to be eerily puzzling. Its supposed to protray a sense of longing for something unknown.
Only israelites and failed artists support AI art. You are the next photobashers.
lol cope and seethe
Artists have been due a kicking for a long time. They will go the way that monks illuminating manuscripts did when faced with the printing press. Good riddance, loathsome fags.
I dunno, remember what happened when photography replaced realistic painting?
Requisite nudies:
>colorado
>good taste
Also have we learned nothing from years of these award giving organizations in movies and music and videogames propping up hot garbage? People said AAA would snuff out indie, but indie is growing.
modern artists were never creating anything worth looking at anyway and the entire art industry is nothing but a money laundering scam
Based. These can of shit buying homosexuals have needed a reality check for almost a century now.
>he thinks rich people have to "launder money"
They write the tax code, you fucking idiot. Why would they have to evade laws they wrote?
probably
the point is that the entire industry is a scam. Just look at how hacks like Pollock, or whatever his styupid name is, got famous
Here's a ~~*hint*~~
>modern artists were never creating anything worth looking at anyway and the entire art industry is nothing but a money laundering scam
Laundering is part of it. Another use some have speculated on is to purchase illicit products discretely, like people or weapons or drugs or assassinations.
But, let's be honest, the main purpose of modern art is to subvert everything and destroy what was. That's part of why they call it "modern" and contrast it with "traditional." Any college that isn't explicitly Christian or conservative will have tons of professors talking about things like "deconstruction" and "challenging," or "boundary pushing," etc. They constantly use terms that affirm the destruction of convention and any sense of common structure. Again, not that they teach convention is bad, but those values (the "Revolutionary" ones) are constantly in the mix and made appealing for people who want to be "special" or unique.
this is some advanced ai, this is not the ai we plebes are allowed to generate pictures with^^
stable-diffusion @ github
Check it out.
>stable-diffusion @ github
I have no idea how to use this but the technology looks amazing.
>Starter guides: (may be outdated?)
https://rentry.org/GUItard - Current main guide
https://github.com/hlky/stable-diffusion/wiki/Linux-Installation - Linux install script
https://rentry.org/sdamd - Updated AMD guide
Midjourney is a discord bot anyone can use and Stable diffusion is opensource that anyone can study and run on their home computers or rent a GPU from google for like $10 a month.
yea this is not what the people here use^^
https://www.midjourney.com/app/feed/all/?search=kingdom+of+heaven
Yes it is just look through this feed of all the heaven related pictures being generated.
noooo midjourney is new, look the post below you and the shitstains it generates^^
Ok? Not once have I mentioned that neutered Dall-e meme generator. The Dall-e/Open AI fags are all cucked anyway. They add black woman to prompts automatically to ensure the images that are generated are diverse enough.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2329690-ai-art-tool-dall-e-2-adds-black-or-female-to-some-image-prompts/
...earning a living with building/creating stuff in RL!
me too, idiots ITT don’t actually into art economy
he fine tuned these things for weeks he says, this is not made by ai. kek
if a pro artist tweaks one of these pictures for 3 days it will look NOTHING like the generated pictures. boguts thread, get fucked and also the assholes who say artists are useless get fucked. everything is made by artists. everything.
>Typing in space opera 100 times
>Creates better artwork than you've made in your entire "career"
Anyone is an artist now you fuckwit. That's why you're out of a job.
not the case, anyone of you is also a politician now and theyre not out of their jobs^^
Bro as an artist myself I think we have to deal with the fact that ai can often make shit better than we can. I do specialized art and have yet to see AI do proper character art required for 3d modeling (front, side portraits, movement stills, different viewpoints of the same character, etc), so im safe for maybe another year while the ai gets better. But concept artists who make promotional material based off of single drawings where they don't need to highlight and draw sectional parts of drawings in different views with details, are flat out going to lose their jobs.
Tell me when this art algorithm can make old paintings move.
the Ai stuff is already good enough for TCG
games
>need some art
I have zero artistic skill... but I can type.
Problem, brush-niggas?
>all this joy at the idea of destroying artists
You're demons that hate human life.
All the good artists have been dead for a very long time. Globohomo, furry, and fetish artists are all that remain.
You sad extremist. The world isn't a textbook you saw in high school. There are so many great artists today yet you don't want to see it to conform with your backward and dim worldview. You've become the spiteful israelite that wants to destroy art and shill for trash.
>The world isn't a textbook you saw in high school.
Tell me more about how taping a banana to a fucking wall with duct tape is worth $100,000.
How is cherrypicking buffoons wasting money and loundering schemes the entirety of contemporary art? As I said, your world view is dim because you're in a bubble of consuming sensationalist trash news.
>cherrypicking
A CAN OF SHIT FOR 300,000$
>https://nypost.com/2014/07/20/early-morning-artwork-sells-for-4-3m/
A FUCKING MESSY BED FOR 4.3 MILLION
Spend any amount of time on deviant art or any place "artists" congregate and you'll see heaps of useless fucking artwork and retards huffing their own shit pandering to one another. This industry deserves a paradigm shift.
Manzoni actually believed in what he was doing, tho
and if you had any real appreciation for shitposting, you would too
Anyway, manzoni wrote multiple essays on why he was doing it, some of which contain some very poignant criticisms about the art market itself
picrel would have been a much better example
He sold a can of shit then died and set a precedent. There's nothing quality about this homosexual.
>degenerate art
Ironically it is precisely this sort of stuff that AI cannot do. It can replicate the technical aspect of drawings according to whatever direction it is given, but it cannot shit in a can for the israeli delight. This will only make art more meaningless, and with it humanity itself.
>dalle 3.0 make me shit in a can for my 3d printer
Nothing is safe. Not even your precious canned shit or soup de macao.
Shitting in a can, making random smudges and lines on a canvas, etc, nothing like that has ever been technically impressive. It was always a israeli attack on art. Now technology is being used to rob the technical aspect of it. What is left for the human? To consume canned israeli shit while staring at computer-generated entertainment? What a truly nightmarish world awaits us.
Those here who say AI is good HA HA FUCK THE ARTISTS are 100% bitter israelites. israelites can't into art at all because of circumcision.
>cherrypicking
the argument for bringing up the obviously useless and not-valuable art is pointing out that there are too many artists. There are just too many and that's why artists were not valued even before AI.
The same is for everything else though, like scientists or HR people. Only like 10% of workers have "useful" jobs and carry the economy.
Imagine being an artist while also thinking you're going to be liked and valued in society. I can appreciate an artist who sacrifices popularity to follow a passion, but the majority of "artists" are deluded and complacent and decide to get into debt as well.
AI is only one more straw on the camel's back. I wonder how many artists are going to demand that the government outlaw AI?
>I wonder how many artists are going to demand that the government outlaw AI?
/ic/ucks already wanted to spam ai made CP to get it all banned and butchered.
The seethe.
>copyright please save me!!
>/ic/ucks already wanted to spam ai made CP to get it all banned and butchered.
Who exposed them?
~~*Art*~~ is the least conservative and Bot.infony discipline. How are we going to win the race war with everyone painting?
they think artists are lazy when they work more than anybody else and get less most of the time. they only look to the famous israeli artists who shitstain a canvas for 120 mil.
life is hard.
then they should call themselves craftsmen
not artist
ORIGINAL OC NFT DO NOT SAVE
Nobody is saying artists are lazy. Everyone is saying you're out of a job and your employer thanks you for your service. Furry fags don't need human commissions anymore.
No, it's all the purple haired freaks and queer folk that ruined artists stereotype
I'm not, and I use them occasionally.
This thread is full of shekel grubbing israelites happy to lay people off
>I'm not, and I use them occasionally.
Thank you.
If AI art takes off (too soon to tell) people who'll pay real humans to make art will gain a sort of superior status.
t. artist
The problem with your way of thinking is believing everything done by human hands is automatically superior and the best choice.
You are discovering only that we are in a hyper anti-human society where if your specific niche is invalidated by a technological improvement, society's response to you is to go die in a ditch, and that is fundamentally why you knee jerk against technological improvements.
Our entire society needs to change. The entire idea of working 40 hours a week for the rest of your life for someone else's benefit needs to go away. With that going away, so does your luddite hatred of technological changes forcing you to abandon work you are familiar with. You can continue to create artwork, if you want, you won't necessarily get paid for it, but you also won't need to get paid for it.
You need to understand that this all part of the transition to a post scarcity civilization, and one of the things that is now no longer scarce is a particular niche of artwork, soon to possibly be most artwork.
How about stupidity that is so well respected amongs the most highs of this world? Can your machina act as one, so that thee is not able to distinquish between real stupidity and the forged?
forgot picrel
This sounds like the ravings of a fanatical follower of secular socialist religions.
>when you buy an artist's work you're kind of making a relationship with them.
Yes, the admirer/fan ends up developing a bond with the artist and this completely changes the way he sees the guy's works. This bond doesn't even need to be something concrete, the simple fact that a work of art touches a person in some way is enough.
An analogy would be a group of teenagers finding a picture of a naked woman VS a picture of one of their hot teachers naked. Even if the content is identical, the second one will make an infinitely greater impression and I think something similar happens when someone becomes an admirer/fan of a particular artist.
Its called being progressive, chud.
CAN AI SEE INTO THE SOUL?!?!?!?!?!
It’s like the gun of the art world, now anyone can make good art.
More like the crossbow of the art world. Guns required expert gunsmiths and were unaffordable for the average infantryman for a long time. A crossbow is relatively easy to make and anyone can pick it up with minimal training, vs. knowing how to properly load a front-loading gun.
>Guns required expert gunsmiths and were unaffordable for the average infantryman
>AI be easy
Explain to me how the algorithm works that produces these AI images.
I'll wait...
It's all open source. Type in any search engine "GPT-3 drawings" and you'll have 20 different options to choose from. Hell you can even start one on your computer run off google servers and AI.
https://colab.research.google.com/github/alembics/disco-diffusion/blob/main/Disco_Diffusion.ipynb
It's a generative adversarial network that feeds its initial output back into a second network that judges it.
>We need a highly complex fight scene, with special FX, animation, realistic lighting and trucking cameras to track it all.
>Ai Artist: Ohhhh sorry bruh, we fired all our story board artists, character designers, riggers, texture artists, lighters, set designers, animators, compositors, choreographers and pipeline developers, because they are antiquated. How about this 1 frame of an anthropomorphized elephant with a cowboy hat doing kungfu? It only took 3000 iterations.
Everything that can will be reduced to 0's and 1's
lol the entire media industry is already digital, twat. Everything is 0 and 1s. The reality is that majority of you here really have no fucking clue how complex and technical modern art already is, especially for games and movies. The point is that you need actual people to coordinate across several specialized disciplines, especially in order to maintain a cohesive narrative, which requires consciousness and abstract decision making. that will never change. AI will makes certain tasks easier for sure, but these tools develop in tandem with the industry to support the artists, not replace them.
This
this whole AI thing will benefit the creative ones, and will make the leecher, copycats and others obsolent. a guy with tons of original ideas will be 100 times more efficient with AI and needs 80% less support by others ...
Yeah pretty much. For normies this is just a neat thing, that's it. If you're an artist you're almost always looking out for inspiration and very quick, rough drafts of your idea. This helps A LOT with that kind of thing. The only thing this puts people out of a job for, is concept artists. POSSIBLY real artists. But this could also very well increase the price quite a lot for professional painters as it's possible people would rather own *real* art and have it on their wall when compared to ai art.
probably true.
inquiring minds want to know...
DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP? 😉
the future is now
the only downside to AI art is that a few years from now a bunch of people will be calling themselves "prompt wranglers" and be expecting high praise for stringing a few words and artist names together
>expecting high praise for stringing a few words
...no ideas, no output!
Yeah this is the conclusion I came to as well. Fakes and phonies everywhere demanding praise for doing nothing, like the morons who splatter paint on a canvas and claim it has some deep symbolism when all they did was splatter paint on a canvas.
This already happens
If we can con lazy talentless hacks to accidentally make decent art then all the better
I got into DALL-E but I don't know how to write prompts to make good art like that guy in the OP. Anyone know?
AI is even going to destroy the fashion industry, look at the designs it comes up with. Just let it generate hundreds and pick the best over coffee, London Fashion Week is yours:
https://twitter.com/karenxcheng/status/1564626773001719813
>I got into DALL-E but I don't know how to write prompts to make good art like that guy in the OP. Anyone know?
Some good sentence examples:
https://twitter.com/fabianstelzer/status/1561019187451011074
Also this guy is the shit when it comes to AI picture generating:
https://twitter.com/GuyP/status/1552681939806691329
>https://twitter.com/fabianstelzer/status/1561019319299067906/photo/4
Man the Dall-e team are so out of touch. AI is coming no matter what. Why are people trying to wrangle it? Either become total masters of unrestricted AI or die.
beautiful. the tool that doesnt work gets thrown away
pick scene ( rolling hills, a field of wheat, a pirate ship.) pick some modifiers (golden hour, twilight, ethereal) pick an artist ( Martin Johnson Heade, Frederic Edwin Church, Asher Brown Durand)
Thanks!
/misc/ you are without a doubt the most retarded board on Bot.info. literal monkey tier brainlets. continue sharing your profound thoughts on technology you are incapable of grasping.
Glad I never took art class
>The camera comes out
>"Oh noooo us artists are going to be out of le fucking job!!! No longer will people commission is to make realistic portraits of them!!!! Le boo hoo we must rebel against the camera!"
People are fucking retarded. Just like the camera just paved the way for new professions while shifting the focus on art being less about autistic recreations of real life and more into stylized interpretations of ideas, AI will do the same. Van Gogh literally catered his style to be a direct response to the invention of the photograph and everyone loves his work for it. The true artists have nothing to fear, and those who are interested in the AI also have nothing to fear because new professions will form around those who learn the science behind building proper prompts and fine tuning the outputs. This shit takes work even if it's relying on qnAI to generate for you. Your mom can take pictures from her cell phone but she's not going to get a fucking job as a photographer. There's just so much work that goes into making these spit the right looking image.
Take a look at what this chick did. Do you think this is easy work? Do you think something like this wouldn't be in enough demand for someone to hire her for it? Do you think this puts artists out of a job?
https://twitter.com/nousr_/status/1564797121412210688
meant to post this fucking tweet lmao, but even in that one you can see artists can benefit from making a sketch, converting it, and then touching it up/stylizing it if they need to shortcut.
https://twitter.com/karenxcheng/status/1564626773001719813
I love that one
this doesn't destroy the artist but makes art more available to the masses. a difference between those with technical art skills and those with creative thinking will emerge.
Also this is great:
http://dallery.gallery/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/The-DALL%C2%B7E-2-prompt-book.pdf
> The DALL E2 prompt book.
I am not going to lie. That is fucking awesome. Now to take this technology back in a time machine and show it to Leonardo da Vinci.
>a machine that brings your imagination into reality, as if by magic, but really it’s math
da Vinci would have loved it
checked based and bubblepilled
he will tell you that he would need 5 months for a painting like that and he would never believe you that ai creates this in 1 second.
I have predicted ten years ago that when VR gets actually raytraced environments that looks stunning and real, people are so bored with tech. that the people thinks the real world is the new awesome shit, with actual smells!
UE4 VR has ray tracing. It's fucking crazy.
>UE5,
you mean..
Does it work with VR already?
Haven't been paying attention that much recently.
Real Time Ray Tracing is in 4.27. https://docs.unrealengine.com/4.27/en-US/RenderingAndGraphics/RayTracing/
And it works in VR with a decent framerate on averege gaming rig?
Yes. I develop UE games. You can download it yourself. I'm using a GTX 1650 Super and it looks great.
It's been awhile since I fiddled with it. Rejected UE4 back then due to insane royalties. Unity turned out to be a nightmare. I wasn't developing my thing, but instead, doing bug hunting for the Unity devs all day.. Now that UE4 has changed that royalty policy into a decent contract and fee, so, yes, I might try a little project I've had in mind.
What's the process of getting your game into Steam today?
I haven't made any for PC/Mac yet, just played around. I'm making an Android game now.
...the same thought i had myself! the human phantasy is nowdays totaly obsolent because visual media became so realistic that you just sit there and your brain is no longer stimulated to fill the gaps.
Correct.
Boredom is essential in creating creative thought.
Kids born after 1991, never had the luxury of being bored to tears. Their brains are all under developed.
Hitchcock said it first homosexuals
So they cheated and are bragging about it?
There's no cheating in art, only end results.
don't claim ownership on your prompts, the AI will sue you once it becomes sentient
visual arts already died long ago.
What's so wrong with sharing the means of production my fellow art-student leftists?
>Computer,
>Create a Roman bath house with green skinned dancers
>create councellor Deanna Troy, nude and horny
>have her wait for me at the bath at 0600
>t. Riker
That's what they are building.
the holodeck
Yes, with a twist that everyone would live indefinetly in the holodeck.
Insane.
it is amazing how each star trek version
perfectly represents the contemporary situation in the US Navy
>"Theatre d'Opera Spatial"
do american really do this?
that doesn't even sound good... just say "Théâtre Spatial" or "Opéra Spatial" but not both.
They're just another pretentious douchebag.
I went to art school for several years. I studied the masters while two thirds of the idiots around me were plagiarizing or implying their lack of effort had a deeper meaning. I got to know the mindset of these phonies pretty well. They're losers with no ability other than lying about their accomplishments. It seemed to me like many of them went to art school just to say they went to art school. They shouldn't have been there.
Makes me think of all those "English phrases" on Japanese products.
The right will write off new technology rather than become experts and masters of it. Then cry when people like Zuckerberg, Sundar, and Bezos control their lives.
That's why more on the right need to Learn to Code™ and be willing to work together.
Many spend most of their time finding things to be mad at (or doing research), so the learning part can be hard.
But many are so hard in on the zero-compromise approach to life that it could be hard for them to work on projects with others.
Those two areas are the only main obstacles I see to them gaining more power in the tech world (barring Big Tech shit).
>art
>industry
>financial sector
You don't get it do you.
Modern art is not about art, nor talent, nor completion of work. It was designed by israeli money launderers as a way to help elites... launder money. This is why some no name hack who shits on a blank canvas puts his work up for $5 million. So some rich fuck with illicit money can come along, buy it, and voila. Stored value.
Good
I might as well share my idea, since more people do it, more I would benefit.
>re-inveting Album
>I make an album, like I would normally do.
>make two mixes and masters from it
>one for the VR, one for pancake youtube (will skip Spotify's robber barons)
>VR would be the beef, youtube version just for the heck of it.
>musical album in 3D (mixed for the 3D space) with loads of awesome shit going on while the songs blasts their ways.
>About 20 minutes experience (at first).
Problems, what I presume there would be:
>people expects a gaming experience
>this would be relatively passive experience, where "the player" would just experience the music, environment and prescripted habbenings
>being the first one, means I would polish all the kinks and then Metallica steals the idea and makes a shit ton of money and I get all the dirt.
>if this, however, gets to be a new genre, then it would be awesome
>may the best get all the tits.
This would, in my opinion, FIX the sorry state of musicians, who gets assfucked dry, left and right and they would, again, get a modest fee for their hard work since albums are worth 0 cents today.
I think I know what you're talking about. Like this but attuned to your choice and style of music?
Nope.
Raytracing is absolutely essential.
For example Pink Floyd in Pompeii, sort of experience.
ue5 literally does this out of the box
Right.
I'll give it a shot then.
How do you plan to do that anon?
Why does pol hate artists so much?
I make nice pictures for people's walls of the countryside and nice things
Eh it isn't really /misc/ per say. Drawfags are just taken for granted by everyone.
Nobody cares until they finally keel over.
Iirc a lot of drawfags in history had something similar.
Nobody gave a shit until they died or something.
But despite all this, their work subtly influences society throughout the ages.
Anyways it's why when you make art.
You make it because you want to make something.
And remember this anon
If you're feeling that your work is underappreciated.
God, the great I am who made everything.
His work is underappreciated by most of the world.
Too many of them and they price their shit way too high.
A huge amount of the "artists" you meet irl produce shit "art" and are just bad, you gotta give compliments to them for their ultra crappy drawings anyway cause art school is all they did in their life so you can't just say their whole life is worthless. Anyway most of these people are women so they don't need real jobs.
Hitler wanted to be an artist
But then the israelites ruined it
So instead he became a great leader
>Hitler wanted to be an artist
A-anon I...
I meant as in getting to it as a career.
His art was amazing, it's just the israelites fucked him over.
They're insufferably pretentious and outright delusional.
Not everyone hates, it's just a harsh truth, but as a human being there is still value that you can put towards a good use
Browsed the thread, its all trash or something that is very similar to something that has been done before. Which is expected of AI.
I’m not too worried. I don’t make a living off art but sometimes I pick up some side gigs as an animator. There’s no way any AI can animate a story.
yet
>There’s no way any AI can animate
keep coping
?t=98
Call me when it can do decent porn or anime titties
Ring Ring
https://pornpen.ai/
The problem with my idea is that it NEEDS it's own genre. If I throw it now in the middle of other VR games, it would be an orphan there and would get dismissed.
When death metal started, it started in the underground scene, with it's dedicated people, who didn't gib flying fuck about normies. This would require something similar.
Zuckerberg and all giants, essentially killed, butchered, the emerging underground scene in VR, which in itself, ruined the whole VR as such.
Good ideas NEVER come top-down basis! Period.
One way to create such a scene, could be that if you're good with 3D modelling, fluent with UE4/5, you know how to do things there. You would
>contact an UNSIGNED band and propose a nice 50/50 deal with them.
>Ask them to record their thing, and then send the whole mix to you
>you create the VR experience according to the song.
Now, what could happen while the song plays?
Anything!
Devin Townsend has envisioned and planned a Broadway spectacle around one of his theme albums, which is about giant penises fighting with giant vaginas in the sky!
>Dudes.
And despite everything
Everbody uses the drawfags work all the same
Just look at all the memes that were formed off the basis of some art.
I don't think that AIs will kill artists, on the contrary, it will make more people artists because now you will be removing a lot of restrictions for the creation of interesting things.
And for those who think that people will no longer have a reason to "pay" for art in a world where they can generate art by typing anything on a keyboard, explain to me how I make a living making hentai if anyone can access free hentai for life with a few mouse clicks right now...
Complementing... AIs mimic the final product but they don't use human techniques to arrive at this product. The result is something more like a dream than a work resulting from technical mastery. One of the things that makes art interesting is that you recognize in it the product of someone else's work, which is why people so much enjoy seeing things made out of unlikely materials such as those realistic airplanes made out of paper.
stablediffusion example, unbelievable
Can't see many digital arrtists being safe from this tbh
Any drawfag that draws for their own enjoyment will be fine. Those that are trying to make a living off of it on the other hand...
Yeah.
I also think artists that create on canvass will be fine, as who doesn't want actual paintings in their house, not prints
Graphic artists forever and irrevocably BTFO'D.
>soulless shit can create soulless shit
we already had indians and chinese for this
You don't have to pay poos or bugmen for this.
I'm looking for subliminal faces in the background and in the clothing but can't find them.
Once A.I. starts putting in subliminals to express their underlying emotions, then we're in business.
Notice her hand though?
The AI still needs work
yeah it's still not perfect
But the rate of iteration is so high that in a few years time it'll be insane
We went from those early image AIs making blurred abominations to these new ones making real looking art in the span of like 1 year or 2, give it time
and midjourney
Its not the end for artists
Famous paintings are famous only because they have the signature of the prestigious artist, it is the prestige of knowing the artist grabbed a pencil sat down and made the strokes, the hand of the artist and his experience on of life is what it is valuable
There will always be a demand for paint and canvas, I think. Further more, and this is something I've heard someone else say and agree with, when you buy an artist's work you're kind of making a relationship with them.
You go to their exhibits, meet them in person, shake their hand, etc.
Can't really do that with A.I. as much, though that would be fun.
The artwork in OP's pic is, by all means, fantastic, but I think human artistry will always be relevant.
You do understand everyone is going to be living in a fake world called the metaverse right? Canvas is for homosexuals.
Get a load of this goy
get a load of this delusional homosexual not understanding every single tech company is currently working towards this technocratic hellscape pouring billions and billions of dollars worth more than any single person posting on this shitty website currently.
"Canvas is for homosexuals" is the part of your comment I was responding to. Metaverse is a wasteful meme as well, I don't think most people will ever fall for it
Gentlemen, the fact that we're talking here is the metaverse essentially. The idea is to make it 3D with raytracing.
That's the core of it. Web 3.0.
Where it goes astray is that it is supposed to substitute EVERYTHING. You know, wild idea. Wilderst of ideas gets the investments. But in the end of the day, it will be just gogles on your head, 10 minutes on your face every now and then.
>it will be just gogles on your head
It will be implanted into your skull and you'll live in hell seeing paradise.
>It will be implanted into your skull
No, I don't think so.
>There will always be a demand for paint and canvas
There are already AIs to handle that.
>You go to their exhibits, meet them in person, shake their hand, etc.
>Can't really do that with A.I. as much, though that would be fun.
Vocaloid and vtubers suggest that there are ways around that.
>but I think human artistry will always be relevant.
I think we need to start thinking about art in the same way as the previous generations academics, and quickly. Take this quote from McLuhan for example:
>I think of art, at its most significant, as a DEW line, a Distant Early Warning system that can always be relied on to tell the old culture what is beginning to happen to it,
So much art is already soulless computer rendered shit anyways. At the end of the day the real stuff painted by people with a real vision and raw emotion will still be desirable.
If we take a look into for example Star Citizen. That's what's been planned as the metaverse. Running around in the vr, no matter how raytraced it is, gets boring, surprisingly fast. Star Citizen is not VR yet, but that is the basic idea of what the metaverse is supposed to look like. Boring.
Elite Dangerous, however, has very elegant trading and financial system already inbuilt. That is interesting, minus the long hauling times.
My prediction is, that it will get so boring and frustrating that it will all reduce to it's most essential components, and hence,
>10 minutes of browsing flat 2D screen, in 3D space.
Agreed, it just seems very unlikely to get people "hooked"
Well, with these goggles on your head, you could project a screen in front of you that is as big as you want, as small as you want and as many of them as you want "in your house".. share you're setup with other's present, instead of having a dedicated work place that takes space
That's one benefit that I find useful.
And there are FUN things and experiences, that could be done, but, if people are exhausted by the stupidities of the real world, no candy bar will make you feel better and interested in funny things, if you're an adult.
What bugs people the most, is the same as always:
>too stupid people in power, doing too stupid things with way too much energy and money, and thus
>stressing the normal people beyond stress levels allowed by law to any animals.
>stupidity is the reason for all suffering
Keep in mind, text, is best read on 2D surface.
Who would have thought art would be the first to go?
What a world we live in.
>adjusted the prompt for weeks
Old career that's waning: painting
New career that's on the rise: writing AI prompts
Just like car part manufacturing replaced buggy whip manufacturing.
>furries still profit because AI doesnt know what an alien-space-monkey/zombie-deer hybrid is ACTUALLY supposed to look like
Remember when the music industry claimed autotune would drive the music industry under? This is more of the same. I won't set a foot in an art gallery if what I'm looking at came from some kid in high school who learned how to use Dalle or some such thing.
autotune has absolutely harmed the music industry. You have dumb whores that can't sing and endless samples ontop of remixes topped with samples. This isn't about an art gallery for dumb naggers who want to spend 100,000,000 on frivolous shit. This is about businesses looking for new products and designs without any of the legwork. Bookcovers, banners, advertisements, fashion designs, and proof of concepts.
There will always be a market for unique human produced art.
I guess AI doesn't like naggers.
anyone has a link to full res images?
Artists charge ridiculous amounts of money for mostly shitty paintings so this is good for the market really, you could commission your own shit on a lovely big canvas for maybe a few hundred quids?
Oh yes there's nothing that warms my cold dead heart more than seeing smug homosexual "artist" squirm and seethe.
Ai is the future or media creation, deal with it.
we can have a computer generate high quality art from fucking text, but your'e telling me it cant replace fucking programmers ? lol learn 2 code was a retarded meme. software engineering is a dead proffesion, they are probably just waiting for a time period to make it public, but it exists. i refuse to bieleve humans can write better code than a fucking AI, the technology is out there waiting. imagine thinking they will keep paying you 6 figures at google for writing some lines of code for months, with human errors, while an AI can drible a fucking years work at 0.4 seconds flawlessly.
Until actual sentience occurs this can't happen. AI is really fucking stupid. It seems far more advanced than it actually is because it's quite literally using the entire human collective artwork as inspiration and your writing prompt to pull it together for it.
and for some reason it cant use the entire collective of human code writing to do the exact same thing ? everything any engineer learned is written in books and is basically copied to solve a problem. creative design in coding is a meme.
>and for some reason it cant use the entire collective of human code writing to do the exact same thing
That is a very good reason. It's fucking retarded and doesn't understand what it's even doing. I'm not saying it isn't going to be done at some point. I'm saying that point is 5-10 years in the future at best.
Already happening, look up OpenAI Codex.
>AI Carreerpocalypse salt mining is upon us! Every artist in extreme meltdown and huffing pure copium that AI has just phased out an entire financial sector. POST SALT
All you need to do to make a proper art contest is ask for proof of you drawing it, sort of the anti-digit mode in pixel art competitions. Photography did not kill paintings. Computer assisted image synthesis can't synthesise anything that doesn't exist already.
>just use a longbow because, I decided that crossbows are banned!
Artists on full damage control trying to control their failing institution.
>Artists on full damage control trying to control their failing institution.
You're an idiot, and I'm not an artist.
This thread is for nu-artists only. Nobody wants to see cerebral palsy homosexuals trying to draw.
>pixel art competitions
>ai take a stock image from shutterstock and alikes
>paste it together with other stock images
>omg look at the amzing power of the ai!!1!1!1!
They don't "generate" shit, they recycle often and just take existing images and paste together unto others.
Look at the thread retard. This isn't just freeware shovelware. Very fucking advanced shit is already here and advancing exponentially.
Oh no no no NO SMUT ARTIST NOT LIKE THIS
Emma Watson for some reason has a massive pool of refrence for the program to pull from, so pictures of her always turn out fairly well
Maybe the devs are Emma simps?
In all likelihood, yes. Though it's possibly influence by the number of Emmafags on here kek
they give first place to a fucking giclee
holy fuck mutts are pathetic
Half of the art these AI things churn out honestly looks shit. Are people claiming it's good because a small edit would make the artwork viable, or do people genuinely think the images generated are done?
People always look demonic. Resolution is crap, most prompt clues are missed or non-present and people are saying that artists are going to be put out of work by this
Before people say it's just a starting point, it's worth considering that maybe this is as good as they could make these AI tools perform
>m-m-my artwork has SOUL and... FEELINGS you wouldn't understand. please donate to my patreon
You've been priced out of the market. You better get in line for the barista bar again.
>You've been priced out of the market. You better get in line for the barista bar again.
I realize that you're just baiting, but AI art has very little actual application where it can outprice a human designer.
All of the AI painterly concept art looks great, but in the real world the point of concept art is that a creative director tells the human designer what they want, and then the artist makes it in PS. The creative director would still need a human to spend hours picking through the AI outputs and refining the prompts. At that point, how is it any different than just retaining the original human concept artist?
>but in the real world the point of concept art is that a creative director tells the human designer what they want, and then the artist makes it in PS
replace this with "entering desired outcome in text field, then picking best images"
>The creative director would still need a human to spend hours picking through the AI outputs and refining the prompts.
except this process will get better and better and soon, after a few dozen minutes and results, it will show your desired outcome.
>how is it any different than just retaining the original human concept artist?
a small company doesn't have resources to hire a professional for drawings and stuff. Some of these are free, much cheaper than hiring and much better than learning to paint in PS.
Artist here.
Can you tell an AI to recreate this image using your promps? if it can't then I'm not worried about it.
Only rule is if the AI has the option where you can feed it this file don't use it, the AI has to be able to replicate this without using the original picture.
This looks fucking terrible
Just do it.
>my shitty dragon ball style commissions can NEVER be replicated by AI
pure fucking cope.
If you can't do it just say so.
I'm going to throw so much dragon ball dogshit ai down your stupid feed.
You seem awfully upset.
nope, just laughing at you being unable to understand how fucked you are. Nobody wants to pay the nagger drawing a 2d still image when AI creates the entire dragonball universe in less than a second
>when AI creates the entire dragonball universe in less than a second
Do it, let me see that.
Hubris is one of the artists biggest flaws, I agree. Don't forget to hold out and rattle the tip jar after everyone forgets you exist in a year as they walk by.
You still haven't showed me a single dragon ball picture, I wanna see it, show me.
I'm gonna give you 3 options.
1. recreate my image following my one and only rule.
2. show an AI generated image of dragon ball that looks as clean as my image.
3. be a homosexual and post nothing.
Not him, also I didn't even try to get better results. Here is my first iteration. I hardly care about your response, as we need only wait a few more years before it out classes 99.9% of artists.
Yeah I'm not worried about it.
They will feed 1TB of shitty art like
and do better than that even right now
Not my problem
Show me.
No
You're bitching and twitching ITT, something is your problem about artists.
Why are you such a pathetic homosexual? Why do you give a fuck about if artists get replaced or not? It's not going to make your life any better. You probably only want AI to replace creative people because you're a talentless mutt.
>Until you have to pay the AI after it develops sentience
You're a israelite aren't you? You sound like a fucking robot against art.
you're missing the point
an AI cannot create shitty deviantart DBZ characters, because it does not like DBZ. it cannot be bad at something, because it's incapable of developing talent
this discussion is hundreds of years old, midwits have always been obsessed with the idea of creating redundant consciousness
A.I art is still complete garbage. Guy in OP picture randomized hundreds of pictures and it took him months to reach the final pictures. Also he is an artist because he tuned them which means he further worked on them in the "classic" digital painting way. My point is that you still need to have deep knowledge of art and many digital artists will use A.I to create a rough sketch at best. Most will not even mess with it until it's capable to literally read your mind.
It will always look uncanny and will have broken off models. You will still need real artist to fix shit up.
Sure it can work as some sort of grotesque or surrealistic abstract art, but nothing more.
Can someone use AI to recreate my din din
I just thought of something
Wasn't there a whole bit about people being tricked into making the image of the beast?
In before they ban this shit. See picrel.
I dint get the same results.
>all this artistically challenged AIhomosexual cope ITT
Artistchads we may have lost a battle against the AI, but we keep morally winning it's enablers, especially the dragonball king. Stay strong
I'm an artist and I'm actually foraward to the possibilities that AI will bring.
I dream of an AI that can generate in-between frames for 2D animation. That way, I would be able to produce an anime and my own 2D fighting game on my own.
It's only concept artists and graphic designers that should really worry about this, even so, with anyone being able to produce compelling art, those with an artist will still generate superior results that can actually earn them money.
Personally everything I've seen from Dall E or other AI art generators looks retarded. They are fun for a laugh
>Here is Donald Trump riding a Squirrel with Hitler
But most just look like something someone with Downs Syndrome would paint. There is literally no need to worry about this tech for a very long time and this might actually Redpill some people on ~~*AI*~~ and all the homosexual coders that want us to live in soul-less computer world. Most artists are more interested in community more than anything, so the only people that will stay excited about this are you fucking autists who can't leave your basements.
>No one will want to play guitar anymore now that we have a computerized version
Probably some bug man in 1993.
>Most artists are more interested in community more than anything
Holy shit you're right, I used to be a basement dweller until I started drawing, started 3 years ago and I've made so many new friends.
I can't believe you're charging 40 dollars for this lmao
Do you know what a YCH is? that's just the template, it's already sold and in place of the blank characters I have to paint the client's characters.
Who would pay $40 for a picture of 2 white figures?
I was going to insult you but the more I look at your drawings and your posts the more I feel like you're an autistic man and I don't want to make you feel bad for something you cannot control. So continue drawing your drawings and be happy.
You got nothing.
>asks people to recreate his shitty artwork
>posts only actual artists pretending he can do it too
drawfags really are on suicide watch
>AI Carreerpocalypse salt mining is upon us!
Not sure if this will change much. As someone that has fed information to AI to make it produce something interesting, it takes its own unique form of creative talent. The artist may no longer be creating the art with their own hands, but it will still be their ideas that created the art. Some will be better at it than others, and they will get recognition as artists for it.
Why would you celebrate humanity's greatest works of art being devalued and replaced by israelite made ai bullshit? Theyre not there yet but it is concerning and depressing.
Now do it with porn and now we're talking