You don't pay for art. You pay for the popularity boost when the artist shares the art associated with your work that uses the art.
It's indirect marketing
I don't pay for art.
I still might pay some very small amount for something I couldn't get any other way, but in general I have more than enough art I enjoy to pay for more.
of course people would if you can undercut them. probably not coomer shit though. spicing up content though? for sure.
offer to add 10 cheap images (compared to the stock image prices) to each of their blog posts or something like that.
No. Pray tell, what is it that you think you could generate that someone else couldn't? Multiple models already live in the wild. Instructions on how to train your own are out. LORA, control nets, all the outdated shit that did the same thing but slower... All the cats are out of the bag. In a very near future, anyone will be able to generate anything. "But muh sekrit proompts!" Large language models will take care of proompts. Your skills will be automated away, too.
You have a small window of opportunity right now to sell AI shit to boomers who haven't caught on, but the only way to halt progress would be to outlaw general purpose GPUs. Which I honestly think will happen the moment some thot cries about "revenge porn".
I would pay for a trained model to generate pixel art spritesheets for SNES-like JRPGs. I actually did buy a model for 50$ but it's not great for spritesheets. I tried other models specifically made for spritesheets but they suck.
Think you could make a model that would consistently generate a character in 9 different poses (facing down, up and left, 3 frames walk animation for each)?
You are in the wrong place
Actually yes I would. I'm assuming this is on Fiverr or something right now, right?
only if it looked like a realistic child
Please send $5 to my paypal
she's twenty-five
at least have her show some pubic hair dammit!
>pubes
that'd make her way too old
No, what kind of drooling retard would pay for art?
You don't pay for art. You pay for the popularity boost when the artist shares the art associated with your work that uses the art.
It's indirect marketing
No as well.There's always something good in an old wall calendar. I'd pay for a frame from a thrift shop.
AI doesn't necessarily make the art better. Would I pay for good art generally? Sure, I would
I don't pay for art.
I still might pay some very small amount for something I couldn't get any other way, but in general I have more than enough art I enjoy to pay for more.
lol no. stop using the latest tech fads to justify consumerism.
Yes
of course people would if you can undercut them. probably not coomer shit though. spicing up content though? for sure.
offer to add 10 cheap images (compared to the stock image prices) to each of their blog posts or something like that.
sure but at this point you'll have to provide me a full 4k lewd set for $2
Nope
Unlikely, but am currently building a site that generates endless series of free-to-download anime girls with fairly high yield rates
You'd have to work really hard to wonder why you have a brain but cannot even use something as simple as an AI art generator.
>art that you couldn't generate yourself
If it's made by AI then I CAN generate it myself, so no. Nobody's gonna pay you to proompt, retard.
What are the best generators right now?
Stable diffusion works really well on your own machine
gib prompt
>Would you pay for AI shit anyone can make
Just get a fucking job you loser.
No. Pray tell, what is it that you think you could generate that someone else couldn't? Multiple models already live in the wild. Instructions on how to train your own are out. LORA, control nets, all the outdated shit that did the same thing but slower... All the cats are out of the bag. In a very near future, anyone will be able to generate anything. "But muh sekrit proompts!" Large language models will take care of proompts. Your skills will be automated away, too.
You have a small window of opportunity right now to sell AI shit to boomers who haven't caught on, but the only way to halt progress would be to outlaw general purpose GPUs. Which I honestly think will happen the moment some thot cries about "revenge porn".
>paying for 1s and 0s
no, art has no value.
AI will not be capable of creating images bearing a limited colour palette within the next 20 years
I would pay for a trained model to generate pixel art spritesheets for SNES-like JRPGs. I actually did buy a model for 50$ but it's not great for spritesheets. I tried other models specifically made for spritesheets but they suck.
Think you could make a model that would consistently generate a character in 9 different poses (facing down, up and left, 3 frames walk animation for each)?
hey you might like this, he was ahead of his time
If reliable posing is the issue look at ControlNet ontop of SD
No, that defeats the entire purpose.
no because the point of ai art is to devalue art entirely