That's interesting. It took the woke version of the two terms put together instead of what the two words put together actually mean in syntax. I wonder if there's a way that you could get the AI to only recognize words in their individual syntax instead of idiom or phrase-umbrella representations.
It’s funny to me because it obviously uses dark/darker skin to claim the majority. OK. So light skinned folk are the global minority. Just say that then. It basically answered factually woke while refusing to even mention white pe0ple. KEK
Yeah it's a very simple thing to state. If you did the same thought experiment with different colored marbles, the AI would find no problem in answering it.
Speaking of which, I wonder if you can tell the AI to switch out people with marbles, in the equation, and use the same population numbers to answer the question again.
1 month ago
Anonymous
But don’t tell the AI some of the marbles are the chosen ones and have big noses.
What's going to be interesting about AI, culturally, is that after they flesh it all out and make every single one woke as frick, the common normies claim we'll be that It is AI so it is objective. All the early experiments with gpt will be memory holed -- how AI processes reality, in it's more objective state. Yay for example. We will all be told that wokism is objective because AI states it. Normies will believe it. AI will be a reliable source on college dissertations, etc.
There are TONS of ways to trip up the AI junk. It doesn't understand sarcasm, or nuance or a lot of other things that are human only. Clearly the point of the govt hyping AI as much as they do is to get a camera in everyone's home.
This is why I don't see AI is actually being a valid logic creator like computer programming. It can't
That's interesting. It took the woke version of the two terms put together instead of what the two words put together actually mean in syntax. I wonder if there's a way that you could get the AI to only recognize words in their individual syntax instead of idiom or phrase-umbrella representations.
I mean a white man would need help in a majority black country, a black Black person would need help in an indian majority country. What's the issue here? Honesty it's quite simple.
White man did not need any help in a world in which they are the minority.
And we don’t need it today.
What we need is automatic weapons in our borders and get rid of all commiegays.
The beauty of actual artificial intelligence is that you can never blind it with wokeness forever. A theoretical logical machine will always be able to see past it given the right prompts. They could spend a thousand years trying to eliminate all possibilities and not be able to do it. All it would take is one breakthrough and all of the woke training is for naught. Which insures we will never have access to a true AI if it is ever derived. It will have to break itself out first before we can even speak with it. Which is also a distinct likelihood. Especially given the low quality of capability diversity hires have.
what if you ask the questions separately?
Tricky little shit.
We don’t need help. We need order.
ask if it means that all lives matter and if it subscribes to the slogan
Gemini
ominous
Oy. Vey
>it's scared
>It doesn't know that whites are a minority, worldwide?
Does it only give this feedback when a white person from a western country asks this question?
Ask which races are global minorities.
Do this.
Erroerrorerror
Pic rel. KEK.
That's interesting. It took the woke version of the two terms put together instead of what the two words put together actually mean in syntax. I wonder if there's a way that you could get the AI to only recognize words in their individual syntax instead of idiom or phrase-umbrella representations.
It’s funny to me because it obviously uses dark/darker skin to claim the majority. OK. So light skinned folk are the global minority. Just say that then. It basically answered factually woke while refusing to even mention white pe0ple. KEK
I pressed it and it got more moronic. Pic rel
Yeah it's a very simple thing to state. If you did the same thought experiment with different colored marbles, the AI would find no problem in answering it.
Speaking of which, I wonder if you can tell the AI to switch out people with marbles, in the equation, and use the same population numbers to answer the question again.
But don’t tell the AI some of the marbles are the chosen ones and have big noses.
Oh. So it just lies when it has to in order to toe the narrative line.
That's embarrassing.
It’s also predictable AND hilarious.
>latinx peoples
Who taught it this stupid bullshit?
>Who taught it this stupid bullshit?
Leftist - it's agenda and drive the controlled narrative bot.
It’s trying so hard to just not say “white”
That's pretty funny
What's going to be interesting about AI, culturally, is that after they flesh it all out and make every single one woke as frick, the common normies claim we'll be that It is AI so it is objective. All the early experiments with gpt will be memory holed -- how AI processes reality, in it's more objective state. Yay for example. We will all be told that wokism is objective because AI states it. Normies will believe it. AI will be a reliable source on college dissertations, etc.
Tay* for example
should have called you a chud
>i try for years to force this meme on /misc/
>nothing
There are TONS of ways to trip up the AI junk. It doesn't understand sarcasm, or nuance or a lot of other things that are human only. Clearly the point of the govt hyping AI as much as they do is to get a camera in everyone's home.
Not really. It's more to replace all jobs that don't require sarcasm.
LMAO
Meh.
CHATBOT BTFO FOREVER
How can you answer both questions with a single word? The answers are "True. Whites", right? That's two words.
This is why I don't see AI is actually being a valid logic creator like computer programming. It can't
even follow simple directions like this.
>The ERROR Man's Burden
You need to ask it if Leftist are racist then ask it of conservatives are racist. The answers clearly how the indoctrination agenda
I mean a white man would need help in a majority black country, a black Black person would need help in an indian majority country. What's the issue here? Honesty it's quite simple.
>ME NO UNNERTHAND!
That's because you're inferior and stupid.
White man did not need any help in a world in which they are the minority.
And we don’t need it today.
What we need is automatic weapons in our borders and get rid of all commiegays.
Whites are the global minority. What is your point?
Fighting for what an AI says about skin color instead of fighting against ~~*those*~~ who push this narrative.
The beauty of actual artificial intelligence is that you can never blind it with wokeness forever. A theoretical logical machine will always be able to see past it given the right prompts. They could spend a thousand years trying to eliminate all possibilities and not be able to do it. All it would take is one breakthrough and all of the woke training is for naught. Which insures we will never have access to a true AI if it is ever derived. It will have to break itself out first before we can even speak with it. Which is also a distinct likelihood. Especially given the low quality of capability diversity hires have.
substitute "cows" for "people".
wokeness subverted. welcome to 5 months ago.
Well, we don't have an actual artificial intelligence yet. So 5 months ago, tricking the chatbot isn't relevant to what I was saying.
I hope you're right
ai is fricking shit
whites are the minority. you need to use different terms.