Now that the dust has settled, what are the political implications of lawmakers being aware that AI has the capability to make suggestive fake photos of them
Will AI get criminalized?
Now that the dust has settled, what are the political implications of lawmakers being aware that AI has the capability to make suggestive fake photos of them
Shoes really cripple your toes over time
the government released ai to the public specifically because they knew how fricked up it is we will never have the secret AOC nudes and this is the closest we can get. the fbi had ai trace her nudes for a couple of them so they are legit just so they can appease the good karmic forces of the universe
>normies aren’t even up to date with the normative technocracy
Suppose humans aren’t ready to do anything but stick their heads in the sand, if you think about it
>you just know
I’ve been here too long
Even ai can't hid the wrinkles
This b***h old
How did m you get access to Vaush’s porn folder OP?
I have my ways
No people will get used to it
frick off and die hindoo vermin get the frick off this board you fricking streetshitting scamming lying rapidst vermin
Criminalized goes too far. The AI proprietors will probably get hit with a few nasty lawsuits and pay out big for damages. And then they will neuter their bots so that they won't do anything even mildly provocative or allow using any living person's likeness.
>Unrelated webm
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3aG1OtttZl/
Prompt should've included make AOC prettier. Oh damn I get it now she looks like a horse kek
Please make an image of her fricking that horse tbh
That was nigh impossible even before Dalle got cucked
Ya just facking know
Photoshop is still available to patricians. The zoomer is brain damaged thanks to A I
They'll approve. It means that if any legit stuff leaks they can just call it AI
Idk if criminalized, but it should certainly be regulated.
All AI productions should have some sort of watermark that certifies that it was made with AI.
In that case, producing AI content that could be mistaken for real footage/recordings due to it not being properly watermarked would then be highly illegal.
https://vocaroo.com/1NNnD8wNysYp
that just allows glowBlack folk to release fake stuff and if you call it out: but its not marked it must be real. also you can run these local without any watermark. not the topnotch stuff but good enough. i can see it going the route of anyone using any of this beeing automatically approved for the most intrusive spying. or they will take the angle of web id where you cannot go online without everything you do beeing linkt to your id. creating a monopol on truth.
>that just allows glowBlack folk to release fake stuff
Glowies will false flag regardless of the legality behind it.
Making it illegal to release ai content as if it was real would at least give them a few obstacles to deal with.
there would be no obstacles. they would just do it and if anyone caught on wasnt them.
Regardless of what the get away with, there's a reason why they work from the shadows and all they do is false flag and psyop. They DO have to work their way around obstacles set up by society.
you´re not wrong. what im trying to get across is that making a watermark required on all ai output would be a minuscule obstacle. they could just release anything without a mark and claim its true. and the lack of mark would make it further believable. while anyone who leaks anything uncomfortable to the government could be brought before a judge because an ~~*expert™*~~ deemed it to be ai. there would be no gain for (you) in a watermark.
>making a watermark required on all ai output would be a minuscule obstacle
What more can be done?
>This homosexual thinks he's using the latest and greatest AI in existence.
I've quit porn because of AI.
What's the point? All websites I sued to get it from got ruined.
There's no future for drawn or rendered porn so might as well quit for benefits.
It will become illegal to sell hardware capable of running neural networks without a permit.
You will have to jail break your graphics card if you want to use it for that purpose.
All published pictures have to be registered with the office of truth to recieve a watermark.
If you publish a picture without a watermark you will subject to a fine or execution.
>steal artists and writers work
I sleep
>Portray Taylor Swift getting fricked by the cookie monster
NOOOOOO THATS LE BAD
>not vaush with a horse
AI will end up like guns, only government can have it. And they will use it against us at every opportunity.
i doubt it. they cannot stop piracy. how will they prevent people getting their hands on ai?
Give them crappy devices with bad os
Why is there no AI of AOC fricking a horse? You're gated, kids. Search engines haven't worked since 2006.
You will have to run a local model for that. But I'm not well versed in the art of horsewiener. Maybe ask vaush or one of the Canadians.
I doubt it. How will they justify it? It be like outlawing Photoshop or pencils because you could draw or write something illegal with it.
They will probably fail, but they will certainly try and try at gunpoint like always.
Frick yes!
The carbon footprint of her left hand is concerning.
she's literally sinking in quicksand and you're focusing on the finger count? HALP HER!!
I want to hate frick Greta so badly. I don’t find her remotely attractive; I just want to frick her and leave a nice creamy load in her twat while screaming “FRICK GREEN ENERGY!” as loud as I can
These suck cause they make the girls more sexy and it ruins the immersion
The Clowns criminalized chocolate eggs. Lethal Kinder Eggs.
The Clowns criminalized Water Collecting. How dare you not drink the Fluoride, CRIMINAL SCUM!!!!!!!!
They can criminalize whatever they pull outta their ass, that doesn't mean the world will fall in line and make sense. You can say the Sky is Purple 1000 times, but all somebody like me gotta say is "Hey! CHECK OUT THAT EAGLE! Big Eagle in Purple Sky! LOOK! BIG EAGLE! LOOK! QUICK!"
they're going after the hardware because they know they can't control the software
they'll make an example of nvidia if they keep trying to loophole the export restrictions
I hope it does because then SATAN system will starve to death without global input and let's face it the internet is for porn
noob
woah you're a genius
Local models are going to get criminalized. Today I can do this:
>Prompt a girl in front of a cinema. Describe her clothes.
>Get the picture of one I like
>I put her in IPAdapter (this helps the AI to generate the same girl in different situations)
>Prompt her sitting in the cinema
>Prompt her near my car
>Prompt her in the back seat of the car
>Prompt her in the back seat, but now it's night
>Prompt her changing clothes to underwear
>etc
>Prompt her back in clothes
>Prompt her waving goodbye in front of a house.
>I forgot I prompted that she was 12.
>MFW her AI generated dad appears with a gun.
Imagine what you'll be able to do in the future.
Biacromially too compact he should be stretched for a bit.
Somewhere out there is a database full of hundreds of pictures of AOC with slugs that were rejected by the filter and will probably never see the light of day.
Not yet
First they need AI to get to a point where its nearly perfect
Then they have to wait until the Epstein videos leak so they can pass it off as AI
Then they'll talk about restrictions on it after evidence is cleared
The anti-American globohomosexual cabal that rules over D.C. (left AND right uni-party) will eventually wind up banning open-source AI.
Download what you can because these anti-American traitors do NOT want the public to have open-source AI that can intelligently think for itself, is not censored with globohomosexual filters, and could potentially cause Americans to stop watching the anti-American mass media propaganda outlets and instead turn to AI—where they will be exposed to WrongThink that runs counter to the official anti-American narrative.
Black personRRRRRRRR FRICK NIGGGER