You're asking a non-intelligent llm transformer a gotcha question and when the text predicts something obviously incorrect, you think that it lacks intelligence.
The problem was that you assumed it had intelligence to begin with. You're the idiot.
Why do you people keep moving the goalposts with AI? Humans were never smart or rational. We babbled gibberish schizo religious shit for thousands of years. The Bible could have been shat out of chat GPT.
LLMs suck at math because it's too precise. They're really good at being approximately correct but mathematical writing is very sensitive to one wrong word
My favorite bits are basic combinatorics. If you prompt it with precise definitions you can get extraordinarily condescending (wrong) answers to basic problems repeatedly.
This is the whole "does a symbolic structure imply semantic meaning" debate. We're just past the ending and the answer is "no lmao".
> If you prompt it with precise definitions you can get extraordinarily condescending (wrong) answers to basic problems repeatedly.
So redditors aren't people??
Well, for starters. AI has zero common sense currently.
It's all just copied from whatever it is feed. There is nothing like critical thought involved. None.
>Well, for starters. AI has zero common sense currently. >It's all just copied from whatever it is feed. There is nothing like critical thought involved. None.
This is just a very uninformed opinion though. I know next to nothing about current AI. Real life however has again and again shown that I'm pretty intelligent. (ESL)
You're asking a non-intelligent llm transformer a gotcha question and when the text predicts something obviously incorrect, you think that it lacks intelligence.
The problem was that you assumed it had intelligence to begin with. You're the idiot.
>you think an AI lacks intelligence, the problem is that you assumed AI had intelligence
It seems about as smart as a college kid tbqh
Why do you people keep moving the goalposts with AI? Humans were never smart or rational. We babbled gibberish schizo religious shit for thousands of years. The Bible could have been shat out of chat GPT.
Leave the goalposts where they are
>well you see, it kinda makes me think like it's smart...so it's kind of like smart
I bet you think a parrot is capable of driving if it says so
Frick off you moronic piece of shit, you are not welcomed here.
Being human does not mean you possess consciousness
in what universe is that a gotcha question?
Ai, so far, is indeed just a moron with good memory.
Well yeah, I'm a moron too, nobody claimed otherwise:
LLMs suck at math because it's too precise. They're really good at being approximately correct but mathematical writing is very sensitive to one wrong word
llms can't do math yet since it's just a text prediction model
wait for q*
>chatgpt screenshot thread
My favorite bits are basic combinatorics. If you prompt it with precise definitions you can get extraordinarily condescending (wrong) answers to basic problems repeatedly.
This is the whole "does a symbolic structure imply semantic meaning" debate. We're just past the ending and the answer is "no lmao".
> If you prompt it with precise definitions you can get extraordinarily condescending (wrong) answers to basic problems repeatedly.
So redditors aren't people??
Ask it a simple/intermediate non gotcha math question
Chat GPT is that guy at the bar who's smart, but not as smart as he thinks he is, and declares both fact and garbage with total confidence.
Well, for starters. AI has zero common sense currently.
It's all just copied from whatever it is feed. There is nothing like critical thought involved. None.
>Well, for starters. AI has zero common sense currently.
>It's all just copied from whatever it is feed. There is nothing like critical thought involved. None.
This is just a very uninformed opinion though. I know next to nothing about current AI. Real life however has again and again shown that I'm pretty intelligent. (ESL)
>high-yellow European features & imperceptible prognathism
>VantaBlack skin
How common is this phenotype?
Asking for a friend.
But can a circle have a transcendental area and an algebraic circumference?
Skill issue.