>Let's price gouge and blame inflation
same as
>Let's fire people and blame AI
They're just doing what they were gonna do. When does the AI euphoria wear off? It seems like it should be really obvious that AI flopped for mission critical applications with low tolerance for errors. Like, if your big titty anime elf girl has seven fingers, nobody is really going to notice. However, if your car blows through a stop sign, everyone notices that right away. Same with any other job, like programming, where small errors make BIG problems.
TL;DR: AI plataued and isn't going anywhere. When does everyone wake up to this?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Replace self driving cars with ukraine. Same thing.
Self driving cars would probably be fine if the car has a max speed limit of 5-10 km/h.
this they'd probably have better luck using AI in light rails and then ironing out the kinks and using the data towards more productive ventures
I think there are still a good 2-6 quarters worth of milking AI earnings. plus there is some real growth, hardware suppliers and companies creating the models and software are still making massive profits, it's just the companies investing in the products are going to be disappointed.
its not a scam
its that no one wants to be responsible for any problems they cause
you could already have self-driving cars, but whos liable when it crashes? no one wants to be - thats why they are not taking off
it's a litigation problem, not a technical one. i'd wager a bet that it's already 10 times less dangerous than letting a human drive.
Yes and no
https://www.nysun.com/article/death-of-mitch-mcconnells-sister-in-law-is-now-a-criminal-investigation-texas-sheriff-says
The problem is that society is trying to move the two forward in unison. AI cars driving alongside other entirely AI cars have a crash rate of 3 in 100,000 compared to 3,400+ for human drivers. That’s several standard deviations safer. The problem is when you out humans who already can’t drive next to AI that isn’t ready and isn’t equipped for unpredictable fricked up drivers and expect it to perform as it did in a controlled environment.
My Tesla drove me home tonight. I wouldn’t pay the current price Tesla is asking for FSD, but it was worth what I paid for it a few years ago.
>use self driving feature
>it kills people
>you are blamed
i shiggy diggy
Is that one of the drug up zombies in California that fell asleep while using it?
checked and kekked
>You need to be present in the self driving car and take responsiblity for it self drving because YOU JUST DO
Doesn't sound very "self driving" to me...
>instead of taking a stable wide stance like han-zenkutsu dachi and stabilizing itself by positioning its upper torso, the rustbucket prances in place and loses stability each time it lifts its feet off the floor
Kek, this tech is absolute laughable dodgshit.
I believe everything you posted senpai. Just a artificial place to put liquidity or something.
It told you buttholes 5 years ago self driving cars would never take off.
People like to feel in control and there's nothing more powerful than being behind the wheel of a car and deciding if the passengers are getting to their next destination safely or flying off of a cliff.
you guys are idiots, the self driving cars have been a thing for decades(well almost 2).
the problem is the unions and corporations involved in trucking. they know full well once self driving cars are approved for the recreational level the commercial level will be out of a job within a decade.
seriously ask anyone in the industry self driving cars are noticeably safer than the regular driver. and thats not even including paco who doesn't have a license, insurance and even the ability to understand the street signs...
Yeah anon, trailers full of goods are going to left in the control of software that literally has to stop if you stand in front of it. Highway robbery would be rampant again
this is total horse shit
only people that spend their entire lives in an office think that ai will get rid of truckers
even if you create a perfect self driving vehicle youll need a full time operator in the vehicle
theres too many things that need to be checked, maintained on the vehicle. loading the vehicle properly is important and it is the responsibility of the owner. loads shift, straps come loose. placards need to be cleared. specialized verbal instructions are needed for loading and unloading. paper work needs to filled, everything needs to tracked. lots of times theres multiple customers on one load.
not to mention all the theft.
the only place that self driving vehicles will take over is in small loops where their are technicians and mechanics close buy like mining
The Comma 3 is $1500 and is better than Tesla's FSD. You can make your newer model cars level 2 right now. You are the first moronic Jap anon I've encountered, SAD!
Been saying this for a while now when someone pointed out that AI is essentially just another dotcom bubble with these tech companies just being more of the same shit salesmen. People need to start thinking of AI promoters as defense contractors trying to sell you on the "latest greatest weapon" that also happens to not work correctly at all.
It's all a scam. Everyone's a grifter. Everything is fake and gay.
with israelites you lose
AI can probably replace school teachers. not much else though
There's a reason education sucks
It can and is already replacing pajeet customer support jobs.
bc driving between two lines has already been solved in a much more efficient way (it's called a train/tram), but that's the easy part of self driving. at some point driving becomes "real life", if there's construction through a two way street so that only one lane is open and a worker waves you through in the opposite direction, that isn't driving anymore, it's navigating through life and understanding that there's another worker that he's communicating with that you can't even see. 80% of driving can be done with self driving, it's all the edge cases that cause problems.
i do remember my 400 lb coworker being scared to buy a new car in 2016 because self driving cars were going to take over within 5 years or something
Self driving is a luxury feature that plebs cannot handle.
Only master race Aryans are allowed to enjoy such privileges.
I've shown my self driving vehicle to everyone and they all have the same reaction.
Panic and insecurity over "putting their life" in the hands of machine/program/computer.
Seeing them afraid reminds me most humans are soulless animals that will never change or improve.
have any of them sought damages from you for turning on self-driving without your consent?
I won't even buy one of those auto braking shits. like what if I want or need to ram something?
>Self driving is a luxury feature that plebs cannot handle.
This.
The transportation activists conflate self driving with pools of publicly available vehicles for the masses to use. Self driving: fine in my own Bentley. But I'll be damned if I'm going to share a seat where some hobo shat himself catching a ride to the rehab clinic.
Once people turned up their noses at (publicly funded) robot taxis, the tax subsidy support for such fleets dried up.
>Self driving is a luxury feature that plebs cannot handle.
Dumb take. Self driving was suppposed to deliver packages paired with a deliver robot like
none of that happened, because the technology is awful and not getting significantly better
>Let's price gouge and blame inflation
Sure if all the banks and leftist hedge funds want to come out and make a declarative legally binding statement they won't sue the companies they are investing in if P&L doesn't match projections because companies aren't raising prices to offset operating expenses. Oh wait noone is going to do that.
As for you A.I. point, self driving cars can't be a thing yet because too many morons are on the road. The algorithm is still more predictive and can't assess how fricktarded the other people are. and then you have the person driving the car who who also do something stupid as shit.
But other things don't have that variable of fricktards and A.I. will quickly replace many people.
Too slow and wasteful.
this you
>photo realistic!
This. Driving might take a bit longer but it is a limited system with theoretically sensible rules, the robots will figure it eventually.
>Meanwhile in China
>links a white monkeytuber
zou kai, chink
AI has not peaked. Maybe overhyped, but it has not peaked. Several trillion $ companies are spending billions to expand their compute infrastructure and *something* will come of it. Even if the current transformer LLMs are really all there is going to be, simply scaling compute and training data will squeeze more out of the current techniques. Companies are still scrambling to incorporate AI into their workflows. It will be a few years until we have full AI saturation
Self driving cars will never take off until *every* car is self driving, and they're networked together into essentially a nation wide public transportation system. This part will take 50-100 years. Zoomers already don't care about driving so perhaps they can convince the public sooner.
>Even if the current transformer LLMs are really all there is going to be, simply scaling compute and training data will squeeze more out of the current techniques. Companies are still scrambling to incorporate AI into their workflows. It will be a few years until we have full AI saturation
Agreed. I think llms or a subset of the techniques will be the biggest leap we'll see for sometime. But I'm just splitting hairs with that prediction
LLMs are overhyped. They can do neat things, but we're at about the peak for them. For AI to advance further, someone will have to come up with a novel approach.
I hope the cars were programmed to code.
Because people are willing to believe lies if it means STOCK PRICE GO UP
AI was successful. Now israelites have God in a box they can use to control goyim but they must make it publicly appear to be a failure and destructive at the same time so they can ban goyim from using and developing it. israelites will continue to develop it privately of course
>was supposed to be the future
They tried this dumb shit several times in the past and it never caught on because BATTERIES ARE FRICKING SHITTY AND STUPID FOR ANYTHING BUT PORTABLE LOW-POWER DEVICES YOU DUMB PRICKS.
Stick with hybrids, a time-tested means of power for locomotives and tanks.
What marketing people and dumbasses call AI are just programs that copy and paste based off massive sample sizes. Programs that make elf porn and write essays for school have shit all to do with the sort of programs cars would need developed to operate independently, that’s why the technology is going nowhere. A program that could drive a car competently would be real artificial intelligence with the capacity to develop self-awareness.
To say that they're getting nowhere is an exaggeration
Autonomous driving in its current state is impressive but of course it needs to be extremely, extremely safe for it to really be successful
I will wait for the kinks to be sorted out.
We should be replacing all critical jobs and infrastructure with AI. Scientific studies have shown that AI executives are significantly more profitable than human ones. Employees of AI-managed companies also reported higher salaries and satisfaction in the workplace.
It seems obvious to me this should be done immediately.
When they find a new gimmick to jump to the next lie.
self-driving cars might work if you electrified all roads so they would fry anything that tries to get them except for elon musks' electric car.
AI can't handle road hazards