What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI? Are they jealous?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI? Are they jealous?
What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI? Are they jealous?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
I remember when AI wasn't flooded with software engineers and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research. nowadays it's just code monkeys plugging models into data pipeline and run. most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
And? Virgins write the maths and code. Chads use dat fo free and make useful shit.
that's why we no longer open source our code, model n shit anymore.
you think it's funny but when enough code monkeys take advantage of us we will turn them into free model testers for us.
>we
CSlet cope with god complex.
It's not *you* deciding whether to open source code or not, it's da joooos and corporate interests. You're just a tiny cog in the wheel who will absolutely comply to the managerial decision and do the donkey work.
>What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI?
AI bad and dangerous is the most normie take possible right now
>and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research.
the SWEs aren't doing research. are the researchers also now mathlets?
>most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
tfw read the transformers paper, didn't understand a shred of the math, but could still implement it without knowing why any of the layers exist at all
i want to get a deeper understanding of the math behind all this shit but i also feel like my time is better off focusing on how to get a job
>I remember when AI wasn't flooded with software engineers and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research. nowadays it's just code monkeys plugging models into data pipeline and run. most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
This. “Smart” people with “serious mathematical prowess” are mad that the bar to make AI work wonders has been lowered. The idea that AGI will happen purely by making neural networks larger destroys the fantasy that they’ll be the next Newton or Einstein who finds that one weird trick that solves intelligence. That one weird trick is training neural networks with gradient descent and was invented decades ago. The only other thing we needed was for Moore’s law to do its thing for a couple more decades. There’s such a thing as physics envy, but now the physicists have AI envy.
she seems like the kind of person who'd prefer to undersell it and overdeliver rather than be embarrassed for the other way around version.
Making observations is how science is done. Sabine simply observed the reality of ai, one giant circlejerk no thinking inside.
the whole "ai training on ai-generated garbage" soulds like an uninformed cope. do you think ai can't detect ai-generated content? if it can't now, it definitely can in the future.
It's not cope it's the reality. All the data that could have been used to train has been. The players positioned to innovate are companies sitting on proprietary data. The "AI" is not innovating it's regurgitating and adding more compute isn't going to fix that problem. Although. Claude looks really interesting the self-awareness bit is be novel.
>"AI" is not innovating
ai devs aren't trying to do that. what has been the main objective in these recent years are to increase "control" over generation, to replicate exactly what the prompter imagines, not to "innovate".
the worst thing about ai is that humans would be able to control it. instead of democratizing art, humans would just use it to create porn and political images
Bro, just ...
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui
this isn't nearly enough. text2img won't ever be impressive as long as prompters still need to inpaint/edit to get the desired outcome. even with lora/ipadapter sd still messes up eye color
>the worst thing about ai is that humans would be able to control it. instead of democratizing art, humans would just use it to create porn and political images
there is no art in democracy because democracy is a society created by bureaucrats and merchants in order to coom freely
>do you think ai can't detect ai-generated content?
if it can we should be able to get a browser addon or something
THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH IN PHYSICS!
H
E
R
E
I
S
N
O
F
R
E
E
L
U
N
C
H
I
N
P
H
Y
S
I
C
S
!
plants eat for free from the sun. they literally pay nothing
frauds afraid their scams will be exposed
damn, can u see her nipple thru her shirt a little?
scientists, professors, techies, they're all in full cope/denial mode about AI
No one givss a shit. It's not their area of study, therefore their opinion is as valuable as random homeless man's.