What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI? Are they jealous?

What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI? Are they jealous?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I remember when AI wasn't flooded with software engineers and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research. nowadays it's just code monkeys plugging models into data pipeline and run. most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And? Virgins write the maths and code. Chads use dat fo free and make useful shit.

      • 1 month ago
        AIFag

        that's why we no longer open source our code, model n shit anymore.
        you think it's funny but when enough code monkeys take advantage of us we will turn them into free model testers for us.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >we
          CSlet cope with god complex.
          It's not *you* deciding whether to open source code or not, it's da joooos and corporate interests. You're just a tiny cog in the wheel who will absolutely comply to the managerial decision and do the donkey work.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI?
      AI bad and dangerous is the most normie take possible right now

      >and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research.
      the SWEs aren't doing research. are the researchers also now mathlets?

      >most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
      tfw read the transformers paper, didn't understand a shred of the math, but could still implement it without knowing why any of the layers exist at all
      i want to get a deeper understanding of the math behind all this shit but i also feel like my time is better off focusing on how to get a job

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I remember when AI wasn't flooded with software engineers and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research. nowadays it's just code monkeys plugging models into data pipeline and run. most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
      This. “Smart” people with “serious mathematical prowess” are mad that the bar to make AI work wonders has been lowered. The idea that AGI will happen purely by making neural networks larger destroys the fantasy that they’ll be the next Newton or Einstein who finds that one weird trick that solves intelligence. That one weird trick is training neural networks with gradient descent and was invented decades ago. The only other thing we needed was for Moore’s law to do its thing for a couple more decades. There’s such a thing as physics envy, but now the physicists have AI envy.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    she seems like the kind of person who'd prefer to undersell it and overdeliver rather than be embarrassed for the other way around version.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Making observations is how science is done. Sabine simply observed the reality of ai, one giant circlejerk no thinking inside.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the whole "ai training on ai-generated garbage" soulds like an uninformed cope. do you think ai can't detect ai-generated content? if it can't now, it definitely can in the future.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's not cope it's the reality. All the data that could have been used to train has been. The players positioned to innovate are companies sitting on proprietary data. The "AI" is not innovating it's regurgitating and adding more compute isn't going to fix that problem. Although. Claude looks really interesting the self-awareness bit is be novel.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >"AI" is not innovating
          ai devs aren't trying to do that. what has been the main objective in these recent years are to increase "control" over generation, to replicate exactly what the prompter imagines, not to "innovate".

          the worst thing about ai is that humans would be able to control it. instead of democratizing art, humans would just use it to create porn and political images

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Bro, just ...
            https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              this isn't nearly enough. text2img won't ever be impressive as long as prompters still need to inpaint/edit to get the desired outcome. even with lora/ipadapter sd still messes up eye color

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >the worst thing about ai is that humans would be able to control it. instead of democratizing art, humans would just use it to create porn and political images
            there is no art in democracy because democracy is a society created by bureaucrats and merchants in order to coom freely

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >do you think ai can't detect ai-generated content?
        if it can we should be able to get a browser addon or something

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH IN PHYSICS!
    H
    E
    R
    E

    I
    S

    N
    O

    F
    R
    E
    E

    L
    U
    N
    C
    H

    I
    N

    P
    H
    Y
    S
    I
    C
    S
    !

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      plants eat for free from the sun. they literally pay nothing

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    frauds afraid their scams will be exposed

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    damn, can u see her nipple thru her shirt a little?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    scientists, professors, techies, they're all in full cope/denial mode about AI

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No one givss a shit. It's not their area of study, therefore their opinion is as valuable as random homeless man's.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *