What are the consequences of recognised scientific papers using AI art to fake science?

What are the consequences of recognised scientific papers using AI art to fake science?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That rat has big balls

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Has science gone too far?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Science has gone too far many times, anon. Individual scientists have committed fraud many times in the past. This is nothing new.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    catbox?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontiers_Media#Controversial_articles

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        :/

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/6nnFSkM.jpg

        What are the consequences of recognised scientific papers using AI art to fake science?

        The peer review process, everyone.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This was in a Frontiers journal?
        It's kind of an open secret how Frontiers journals have a wide range in quality...
        Not too surprised this slipped by in one of their journals.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is a psyop. A lot of very good, honest research that does not get in under big name journals comes through frontiers. Therefore they have done this intentionally to discredit everything published under their name, even retroactively. Honestly brilliant. Dall-e generated huge rat dick? This is obviously Fricking Fake and literally everyone has fallen for it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry ~~*Markram*~~

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not everything is a pysop. Maybe their peer review process just fricking sucks bro. Sorry that's just how it is.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Or maybe people are morons. Scientists and researchers included.

              This applies to all journals though, frontiers isn't actually any worse. They post real shit sometimes and if you know how to read the papers and have decent domain knowledge you can sort it out for yourself. From now on indefinitely anytime somebody links a frontiers article they will just automatically get ratdick.jpg in return, discrediting huge amounts of truthful and worthwhile research. Face it, "legitimate" and "trustworthy" Science has to be limited to a small number of tightly controlled sources. If real independent research is allowed through by any means the whole thing falls apart, and frontiers flew too close to the sun.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                independent research of what? let me guess, you can't say because the CIA will kidnap you

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally fricking anything, moron
                >there's differences between the races
                Illegal research
                >vaccines have side effects
                Illegal research
                >psychiatric medication doesn't work that well
                Illegal research

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Illegal research
                What?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're not allowed to use certain data that's available only to the government to say, prove that IQ correlates to race

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Source?

                Maybe not illegal outright but certainly unpublishable. See what happened to the guy who discovered DNA for saying there's a genetic difference in intelligence between races.

                Watson just offered an opinion and people whined about it, he wasn't refused publication as far as I am aware. Don't get where this idea of "illegal research" comes from.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Watson was fired for his opinion and had to sell his Nobel prize statuette thing just to make ends meet. There was a serious campaign to get the Nobel committee to retroactively cancel his whole prize.

                It doesn't matter if you are objectively correct that there is a link between genetics if you say so without couching it in the most delicate of terms they will go after you with the rage of 1000 suns. You are not permitted to spread racist facts or or publish works that are critical of other dogmas like global warming.

                If you virtue signal the correct things you can get away with almost anything at least for a while. But if you hint on a sensitive conclusion they will be merciless in the underhanded ways they will try to discredit you and ruin your career.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                What of publicataion?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                *publication

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe not illegal outright but certainly unpublishable. See what happened to the guy who discovered DNA for saying there's a genetic difference in intelligence between races.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >frontiers isn't actually any worse
                If they didn't catch literal gibberish and gargantuan mutant rat wiener despite having two peer reviewers on the case then I'm sorry to say but yes their peer review is uniquely bad.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                science bad because grifter said so
                google "replication crisis"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                If the replication crisis invalidates all research, then I don't have to listen to the research establishing there is a replication crisis.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Now this is based. I can't replicate that result, as far as I can tell almost all research is legitimate and repeatable. Just the one gang of metascientific morons who don't do actual bench work of their own who can't make it happen.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Or maybe people are morons. Scientists and researchers included.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What did the rat do to deserve this?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing, scientists just like to torture animals.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing new I mean there is a replication crisis and a competency crisis. It's not surprising that people that don't give a shit about the things they're studying/researching will shit out this garbage

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didnt the bogdanoffs prove that peer reviewed academia was all bullshit back in 1980? This is not an ai problem.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is true, but now it's even worse.
      Peer review at best is autists nitpicking shit, usually it's people barely skimming or not reading at all and giving some mindless response, at worst it's the authors' pals giving any paper a pass.
      AI generation will just let more shit get shoved in the pipe, but the process is still the same pile of shit, and garbage will still get published constantly. We'll just occasionally get funny egregious shit like this pop up now and then which is at least a good laugh.
      Anyone taking academia or peer review seriously in current year seriously needs their head checked.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/kyU08TG.jpg

      This is true, but now it's even worse.
      Peer review at best is autists nitpicking shit, usually it's people barely skimming or not reading at all and giving some mindless response, at worst it's the authors' pals giving any paper a pass.
      AI generation will just let more shit get shoved in the pipe, but the process is still the same pile of shit, and garbage will still get published constantly. We'll just occasionally get funny egregious shit like this pop up now and then which is at least a good laugh.
      Anyone taking academia or peer review seriously in current year seriously needs their head checked.

      >technology gives advantage in war
      >Why yes of course we will make the quantum temporal domination magic formula public!
      get real.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        you get real. that's not how the world works.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Right now there's a huge probability that over 50% of phd researches are plagiarized, why wouldn't they doctor their investigations afterwards?
      Honestly speaking, with how utterly shit and mediocre universities are nowadays I highly doubt there's a lot of graduates that can even produce good research.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The authors getting fricking blacklisted.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    my first thought was it's probably like that stunt where they wrote some turbo feminist word salad and tried to see how many places they could get it past peer review

    protip: don't try this if you're chinese

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390/full

    Heh, was just showing a friend this week. It's pay to play publiction.

    This is actually nothing new. Chinese journal outputs are largely fraudulent and they're trying to launder them by using pajeets to review them.

    Look at who wrote it, the AI art and who reviewed it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is there anywhere that documents this kind of shit and the journals that do it? I'm building an alternative front-end to arxiv and I'm looking into how to filter out dogshit like this.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >looking into how to filter out dogshit like this.
        Over 80 percent of medical trials from mainland China are completely fabricated data.
        https://www.sciencealert.com/80-of-the-data-in-chinese-clinical-trial-is-fabricated
        According to the Chinese government's own investigation.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not just frontiers. Various editors of some very high profile journals have stated that the editorial and peer review process is largely paid for.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        hence why stings like the giant dall-e rat penis are necessary

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Every fricking time

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hello madam yes please show bob vagene i kindly do the needful and redeem the peer review

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Poos are allowed to peer review scientific articles?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Poos are allowed to peer review scientific articles?

      >poo review

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >this is the kind of people that was trusted to perform peer-review
        lmao even

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          this shit is so funny and sneedham owned all those nerds on shithub

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Ok, someone explain why did this notify 400k devs?
          Is it really just the @EpicGames/developers ? GitHub is very stupid if that is the case.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. It's more epics fault, they went out of their way to force people to join it

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >rohith sreedharan
          sreed

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    literally me

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    bikku bouru
    impossibru

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >dck
    >testtomcels
    >retat

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Tax dollars pay the research grants
    >You do the research
    >You pay the journal just to submit your paper for preliminary examination
    >You submit to an exclusivity contract for the duration of review and in perpetuity if accepted
    >This forced delay means that if not published with the first journal then someone else will likely publish before you and if denied, the impact factor of your paper is likely dead.
    >If accepted, then the editor will demand their own flavor of major changes and revisions contingent to being published, adding even further delays
    >The big journals are all owned by private equity companies
    >Boast over a 40% profit margin with billions in revenue
    >Charge $50+ a pop just to view your paper to anyone and everyone
    >You don't even get a free copy for writing the paper
    >You get nothing but the "prestige" of having published, meanwhile the journal pockets the profits

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      yep

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I NEED a rat fricktoy rn god imagine cumming inside that lil critter and filling him up with your seed...

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw my Rat dck cannot produce Testtomcels
    Feels iollotte man

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Exposing how moronic academia is and they are just a bunch of smug morons that pretend to be intelligent

    /Thread

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >chinks
    >recognized
    ???

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Computa, show me a lab rat that has the BIGGEST blue balls in history of lab rats, as a anatomy section image

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >indian author
    >indian editor
    >indian referee
    >incoherent and totally nonsense paper approved
    Nepotism speaks.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Nepootism

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no way is that real

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's just ai being used by alt righters on fringe websites to produce hateful content, don't worry about it anon

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This has been floating around since before ai video

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Indians literally eat shit, anon. You didn't know this? They get in trouble on airplanes because they bring cow shit in their luggage as a snack.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Only a very small minority of Indians practice this. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's just one of many problems, though

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No other race of people has a shit eating problem, dude.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Gay race does.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Looks relatively mainstream to me.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            😐

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            what the frick is going on here

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Diversity, Inclusion and Equity anon

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                have a nice day

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's not very live, love and laugh of you

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's just ai being used by alt righters on fringe websites to produce hateful content, don't worry about it anon

        AI video is not a thing available to anyone outside of OpenAI, and even if you used the OpenAI model it wouldn't look this realistic.
        https://desuarchive.org/_/search/image/QiFDlPGcKJ%2FsWC5s1ILQ0Q%3D%3D/page/11/#

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      mutilate indians and rape their children.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bestiality is wrong anon, just make it quick and put them out of their misery

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    None? How AI garbage is different from chink/pajeet garbage?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's more related to the competency crisis and less with AI.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It goes hand in hand. Ai is another tool for the incompetent to weasel their way into places they don't belong.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >using AI art to fake science
    Give this man a PhD

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      least hackneyed boomer wingnut poster

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Finally some recognition.
        t. 30 year old boomer

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          wish you fricking homosexuals would stop calling yourself boomer.
          .t 30yr old millennial who hates baby boomers

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >predatory journal is shit
    wtf i hate the scientific method now

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >recognised
    That was just junk published in a predatory journal. Nothing special here.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's the end of society. for real.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >recognised scientific papers using AI art to fake science
    This is a paper known for publishing anything

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    dck and testomcels

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Post moar examples please homosexuals

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      OK, but only because you asked this homosexual nicely.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most of modern science has been faked

    Look how israelites lied about alzheimer's disease and wasted decades of effort and billions of dollars
    Look how they dont even know WHY SSRIs work (but they totally work goyim keep taking it)
    Look how climatehoax is used to funnel money into israelite pockets
    Look up the 'Replication Crisis'

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t. couldn't cum on week 1 of zoloft and pussied out so he's still a depressed NEET raging on BOT 18 hours per day

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nah never felled for the 'depression' israelitery
        Maybe you should try seeking help instead of shitposting on cuckchan to cope with your depression?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Look how they dont even know WHY aspirin works (but it totally works goyim keep taking it)

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/news/how-aspirin-works
            But we do know how they work you moronic israelite

            Unlike SSRI which is completely made up
            https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/many-antidepressant-studies-found-tainted-by-pharma-company-influence/

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_serotonin_reuptake_inhibitor#Mechanism_of_action

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >jewpedia
                yikes, jidf cut their budget too much

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                cider vinegar cures depression (which doesn't exist)

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    big dick energy

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *