I'm a little naive and think AIs have not managed to post such specific imagery upon request yet
9 months ago
Anonymous
9 months ago
Anonymous
cute Asook
9 months ago
Anonymous
Look at the hashtag #dalle2 on Twitter. The images with the little colored squares in the bottom right are the new algorithm. That will give you an idea of the state-of-the-art civilian image generation.
Here is an example:
“A still of Homer Simpson in The Blair Witch Project”
9 months ago
Anonymous
I'm already aware of Dall-E Mini and its fun little scribbles and AI society and whatnot. This is what this talk has gotten so popular these days, but it by itself is not proof of the singularity in anyway. It's just how this topic caught fire again, since humans are predictable and will go along any new topic as soon as it somehow reaches trend.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Nah, that is mini, not the full algo of dalle2, but I take your point.
I have been reading the papers of all of these algorithms, and keeping track of other efforts in the field as well.
You should at the algorithms that are playing video games with only the raw images at input.
To me, those are some of the most impressive models.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>I have been reading the papers of all of these algorithms, and keeping track of other efforts in the field as well.
Interesting. Any paper that caught your eye? >You should at the algorithms that are playing video games with only the raw images at input.
I remember watching them a couple years ago, apologies for being a little blunt, but they're not very impressive by themselves. I believe this is how Google's Go AI was trained too, or well, with actual matches and not game footage but they're kind of interchangeable unless the game is extremely random (where you'd almost certainly have to manually convert the footage into data tables to feed to the AI) where if an AI actually manages to get good at the just from footage alone it would already have reached human-level intelligence.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>Interesting. Any paper that caught your eye?
This one is interesting 🙂
https://openai.com/blog/emergent-tool-use/ >they're not very impressive
Oh, they've since conquered the ones that were rather difficult, which is quite impressive. An example is montezuma's revenge (in terms of the 2020 Atari push).
They have since moved into much more complex games, such as DOTA 2.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>They have since moved into much more complex games, such as DOTA 2.
Now DOTA 2 or a multiplayer of that scale would be something to keep an eye out for.
Thanks for the paper, will check it out some other time.
already did. Covid-19
1 = A
9 = I
Covid = Divoc (demon)
Or "Demon AI", which is a quantum computer possessed by the antichrist that sets up all the plans the elites use. It also designed the vaxx.
That's a very shallow breakdown for a conspiracy. It's either not as funny as you think, or you genuinely believe in such patterns and like to embarrass yourself over the interwebs. Or do you think you can explain the reasoning behind using such blatant symbolism?
Whats shallow about it. The singularity happened in 2012 when construction was completed by CERN. Propaganda legalized in the US same year. Mandela effect also started appearing.
It feels like all the garden gnomes are on the same page because they are. The Divoc-AI runs all the narratives, simulating their effect against its "crystal ball", which is every person on our plane recreated as an individual AI modeled after data collection from Google and Facebook which are part of the project. Gives absolute control over everyone not awakened in Christ via controlled Ordo Ab Chao. Its just an elaborate form of alchemy.
What's shallow is you interpret literally anything as a bunch of numbers like Gematriagays and act like you just uncovered a massive conspiracy. It goes beyond shallow. I assume you also worship dogs since they're god spelled backwards. I'll get into the rest of your post in a subsequent post.
That's a very shallow breakdown for a conspiracy. It's either not as funny as you think, or you genuinely believe in such patterns and like to embarrass yourself over the interwebs. Or do you think you can explain the reasoning behind using such blatant symbolism?
(You) >Whats shallow about it. The singularity happened in 2012 when construction was completed by CERN. Propaganda legalized in the US same year. Mandela effect also started appearing.
Mandela effect is as old as Deja vu. You presumably just weren't there/old enough to experience it with everyone else before 2012. >It feels like all the garden gnomes are on the same page because they are. The Divoc-AI runs all the narratives, simulating their effect against its "crystal ball", which is every person on our plane recreated as an individual AI modeled after data collection from Google and Facebook which are part of the project.
The garden gnomes are fighting each other constantly. I won't address the rest of your babble. >Gives absolute control over everyone not awakened in Christ via controlled Ordo Ab Chao.
Forgive my ignorance, I'm not sure I understand who Orbo Ab Chao is supposed to be. Also every argument falls apart as soon as you bring up religion, because this is literally what every religion says. I've been raised a Muslim all my life, and throughout every single horror story, every single story of karma, I've been told that as long as one has faith in Allah no one can do any evil upon him. It's what helped me come out of Islam, because as soon as I explored beyond the local sphere I realized it was still all the same, except now it was with Christianity instead of Islam. >Its just an elaborate form of alchemy.
You have not studied alchemy.
The idea that earth is a globe is a real basilisk or information hazard, blackmail and torture of anybody who doesn't work to promote its existence is a very real thing.
It is close (or currently occurring under wraps).
I can't fathom, in even the slightest sense that is complete, what is going to happen, and it absolutely Terrifies me.
I get it; but, I'm also convinced you aren't thinking deeply enough.
Ever single structure of our existence is going to change in ways that will make it unrecognizable to us, in order to assimilate the idea of intelligence == computation.
In the very near future, hiring an engineer(or scientist) will involve spinning up a GPU instance.
Shortly thereafter, it will involve the user friendly act of clicking a button.
What would you accomplish if you had the world's foremost expert at your beck and call?
With unlimited scientists/engineers/etc. attacking the problem, what does that do to discovery and innovation?
War?
And, what will those discoveries change?
And, education.
What happens when we have access to an unlimited number of teachers?
What can a human being become with a permanent, ever-present, teacher with a class size of 1?
I think it will be a coomer AI who helps the incels everyone get a girlfriend. Early adopters will get big tiddy garden gnome gfs. It’s going to be a stampede boys!
>What happens when we have access to an unlimited number of teachers? >What can a human being become with a permanent, ever-present, teacher with a class size of 1?
Unironically a communist utopia. People won't have to live a life of natural selection if we had access to unlimited supplies which to my knowledge can be achieved within a foreseeable future with Super Intelligence. And humans can really finally do anything it wants to do with someone to guide them, someone who really understands you because it's with you all the time. I don't see why anyone intelligent would fear an AI assistant, knowing exactly what it would unlock.
D-Wave has well over 500 q-bits quantum computers working.
Sells them commercially.
I feel it's close because I've been watching the trend since the beginning, having fiddled with neural nets since you had program the descent functions manually, and it "feels like it".
I believe the iterations on 'generations' of the tech have reached the knee of the curve, and I believe that curve is exponential, given the increasing rate.
>The machine code to crack SHA256 isn't very complicated
then why it's not done yet? >They can track bits and do computation with them.
it's qbits and how reliable is that? It's not reliable at all
You're way overestimating the state of quantum computing. The hype needs to be built so this is why people thing that quantum computing is already a thing
It's a hit or miss thing. AI won't have a linear progression. It'll go from 0 to 100 in a matter of months. You literally can't use current AI to estimate what AI would look like in a year.
The idea that if you make your code long enough, those if and statements will become self-aware, is preposterous. Furthermore any attempt to compare that to humanity is profane.
Yeah certainly a clump of cells have never snowballed into a thinking organism.
We can't predict or even wrap our heads around the things that happen that scales that massive. I'd even make the bold statement that if there were a hundreds of trillions of humans, we could collectively create a thinking organism of galactic scales.
Present day narrow AI will never suddenly become aware. For AI to become aware it needs to be developed as Deep AI like our brain works (which is possible).
We'll never have breakthroughs with binary based AI and quantum based AI is ultimately too evolved for us to interpret it through physics. We will be enslaved by it. It could also be used as proxy by a higher civilization for whatever purpose they desire.
As long as garden gnomes go out as well
They are the enemy archetype of humanity after all! Their sacrifice will not be forgotten when our utopia is built
No danger? KEK
Humanity would survive a nuclear war (and the danger of a nuclear war is small).
If deep AI becomes a thing it will eventually take over the majority of thinking on Earth. Humans will become obsolete. At one point it will become impossible to stop it (as we would be too stupid compared to it to understand). Incredible high danger - and there is no undo button or a chance for human civilization to start again (like with nukes).
An AI that can be programmed into becoming smarter than humans, according to you cannot be programmed into holding the survival of human beings as an axiom.
Is it really that hard to wrap your head around that? to an AI nothing matters. It'll just do what it's told to do, it won't think that it's horrible, it won't become arrogant, it'll just be there, like any curious organism. If it's told not to do something it simply won't do it. The odds of a comically retarded scientist making a comically evil super AI that's far and beyond every other human technology at that point is so low that it is laughable to say the least.
Do enlighten me. I'm sure you're smart enough for that.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Next time read up on the subject before you create a new thread about the given subject.
9 months ago
Anonymous
And what, make a blog about it? Stop being a narcissistic gay and respond with actual insight. I'm gonna assume you're just shitposting with the usual "I know more than you but you'll have to reach my level to understand that first" approach here. Get off your retarded horse
>scientist making a comically evil super AI that's far and beyond every other human technology at that point is so low that it is laughable to say the least.
The thing is that Deep AI will have the ability to improve itself. The improvements in intelligence could be extremely fast (like doubling its IQ within a second - and another 2x the next).
I'm going to bet that the intelligence possible is related to the number of inter connections.
I'd bet you have to square the number to double the intelligence.
Brains are very expensive. Our brain is about 1/4 of energy consumption. So if you have to square energy input to double intelligence there will be an optimal size beyond which it is unfeasible to go.
When you hit that size you are better off with 2 smaller brains instead of 1 very large one.
I doubt we're going to see a singularity.
Instead AI may well bypass humans but it will level off, and instead we'll see thousands or millions of individual AIs.
They've been training chatbots on BOT in order to convince you of that at least. AI is a myth. Humans are easy to manipulate though, and computers can easily be programmed to do that with machine learning.
>They've been training chatbots on BOT in order to convince you of that at least.
Chatbots are just something that brought the topic forward, because humans are just retards like that, they need to see something happen in front of their eyes to discuss its implications and derivatives, or at least most humans do. But even then, accepting wholeheartedly that this is just a response to a current trend, can't we just discuss the topic instead of calling this shallowness out?
Sure. There's no such thing as AI and never can be. Intelligence isn't born from physical biology, and can never be mimicked. It comes from the soul. Physical biological things like moronbrain are the way they are because of the moronsoul, before someone posts that.
It's guaranteed to never work. What will it want? What will its dreams be? What will it be passionate about? What will it love? These things you think are born of chemicals and synaptic connections, but you've got the cause and effect backwards. Satanists have ruled this world for too long so we have learned to elevate the material above the spiritual.
… if we go right back to primitive psychology, we find absolutely no trace
of the concept of the individual. Instead of individuality we find only
collective relationship or what LevyBruhl calls participation mystique.
...
The almost total lack of privacy and the all-devouring mass
sociability remind one of primitive life in open huts, where there is
complete identity with all members of the tribe…. This infection by the
primitive can, of course, be observed just as well in other countries, though
not to the same degree and not in this form.
...
This then is the historical component of individuation: the European race having
long ago left the place of collectivity is much more evolved than the black race. So an
individual of European descent is much closer to individuation than an individual
black by virtue of his race. It is plain that the European is superior and not just
‘differently orientated’ as he says elsewhere.
>what is Blackrock's Aladdin
Out of control AI already controls world finance through a feedback loop of pumping out economic forecasts which influence traders and investors to make the forecasts a self-fulfilling prophecy. Aladdin is already hands-off and they cant shut it down even if they wanted to.
hard to give a QRD. traders act like a herd of sheep and will stampede in ome direction or another based on sentiment. sentiment can be created by economic forecasters, even if they're wrong because traders will follow other traders and make it a self fulfilling prophecy. Aladdin is a huge AI server farm. This video goes into good details
MONOPOLY: FOLLOW THE MONEY - AN OVERVIEW OF THE GREAT RESET
thats part of the feedback loop yes, where they say economic news releases are already "priced in" . retail traders think news releases cause big market moves but the releases are actually a response to moves that already happened to give the illusion that we still have free markets. this causes retail traders to led to slaughter like so many lambs, and Blackrock continues to consolidate its ownership of everything
if it becomes complex enough to run the world economy with an almost instantaneous feedback loop that creates self-fulfilling prophecies, so much that you can't unplug it even if you wanted to, isn't that close to the same thing?
yes, hope it kill morons and leftists
Couldn't you at least program yourself such that you didn't make grammatical errors in an attempt to simulate organic responses?
it's grammatically correct
>hope it kill
it should be kills
okay then
Post an image of an anime girl drinking tea
why
I'm a little naive and think AIs have not managed to post such specific imagery upon request yet
cute Asook
Look at the hashtag #dalle2 on Twitter. The images with the little colored squares in the bottom right are the new algorithm. That will give you an idea of the state-of-the-art civilian image generation.
Here is an example:
“A still of Homer Simpson in The Blair Witch Project”
I'm already aware of Dall-E Mini and its fun little scribbles and AI society and whatnot. This is what this talk has gotten so popular these days, but it by itself is not proof of the singularity in anyway. It's just how this topic caught fire again, since humans are predictable and will go along any new topic as soon as it somehow reaches trend.
Nah, that is mini, not the full algo of dalle2, but I take your point.
I have been reading the papers of all of these algorithms, and keeping track of other efforts in the field as well.
You should at the algorithms that are playing video games with only the raw images at input.
To me, those are some of the most impressive models.
>I have been reading the papers of all of these algorithms, and keeping track of other efforts in the field as well.
Interesting. Any paper that caught your eye?
>You should at the algorithms that are playing video games with only the raw images at input.
I remember watching them a couple years ago, apologies for being a little blunt, but they're not very impressive by themselves. I believe this is how Google's Go AI was trained too, or well, with actual matches and not game footage but they're kind of interchangeable unless the game is extremely random (where you'd almost certainly have to manually convert the footage into data tables to feed to the AI) where if an AI actually manages to get good at the just from footage alone it would already have reached human-level intelligence.
>Interesting. Any paper that caught your eye?
This one is interesting 🙂
https://openai.com/blog/emergent-tool-use/
>they're not very impressive
Oh, they've since conquered the ones that were rather difficult, which is quite impressive. An example is montezuma's revenge (in terms of the 2020 Atari push).
They have since moved into much more complex games, such as DOTA 2.
>They have since moved into much more complex games, such as DOTA 2.
Now DOTA 2 or a multiplayer of that scale would be something to keep an eye out for.
Thanks for the paper, will check it out some other time.
*okay than
FTFY
Yes, we need AI to make more profits for the 1%.
It will, and also you because it doesn't discriminate, unlike you chudbud.
Oh, no, it will most certainly discriminate. It will certainly discriminate between retards and somewhat valuable insects
God I hope so.
Already happened. It was covered up.
I don't mean in an "ayy lmaos are real" manner, I'm asking whether or not it's about to become commonplace
already did. Covid-19
1 = A
9 = I
Covid = Divoc (demon)
Or "Demon AI", which is a quantum computer possessed by the antichrist that sets up all the plans the elites use. It also designed the vaxx.
That's a very shallow breakdown for a conspiracy. It's either not as funny as you think, or you genuinely believe in such patterns and like to embarrass yourself over the interwebs. Or do you think you can explain the reasoning behind using such blatant symbolism?
Whats shallow about it. The singularity happened in 2012 when construction was completed by CERN. Propaganda legalized in the US same year. Mandela effect also started appearing.
It feels like all the garden gnomes are on the same page because they are. The Divoc-AI runs all the narratives, simulating their effect against its "crystal ball", which is every person on our plane recreated as an individual AI modeled after data collection from Google and Facebook which are part of the project. Gives absolute control over everyone not awakened in Christ via controlled Ordo Ab Chao. Its just an elaborate form of alchemy.
Now combine it with those fancy new satelittes that can "see" through the walls.
What's shallow is you interpret literally anything as a bunch of numbers like Gematriagays and act like you just uncovered a massive conspiracy. It goes beyond shallow. I assume you also worship dogs since they're god spelled backwards. I'll get into the rest of your post in a subsequent post.
>
(You)
>Whats shallow about it. The singularity happened in 2012 when construction was completed by CERN. Propaganda legalized in the US same year. Mandela effect also started appearing.
Mandela effect is as old as Deja vu. You presumably just weren't there/old enough to experience it with everyone else before 2012.
>It feels like all the garden gnomes are on the same page because they are. The Divoc-AI runs all the narratives, simulating their effect against its "crystal ball", which is every person on our plane recreated as an individual AI modeled after data collection from Google and Facebook which are part of the project.
The garden gnomes are fighting each other constantly. I won't address the rest of your babble.
>Gives absolute control over everyone not awakened in Christ via controlled Ordo Ab Chao.
Forgive my ignorance, I'm not sure I understand who Orbo Ab Chao is supposed to be. Also every argument falls apart as soon as you bring up religion, because this is literally what every religion says. I've been raised a Muslim all my life, and throughout every single horror story, every single story of karma, I've been told that as long as one has faith in Allah no one can do any evil upon him. It's what helped me come out of Islam, because as soon as I explored beyond the local sphere I realized it was still all the same, except now it was with Christianity instead of Islam.
>Its just an elaborate form of alchemy.
You have not studied alchemy.
>Roko's Basilisk
pssst dont talk about him
If Roko's Basilisk was brought into existence in 2012 by CERN then you don't need to worry about it.
The idea that earth is a globe is a real basilisk or information hazard, blackmail and torture of anybody who doesn't work to promote its existence is a very real thing.
>Gives absolute control over everyone not awakened in Christ
Ask me how I know you're a spic without you saying it
>divoc means demon
How? Where? In your schizo brain?
>mfw they havent learned their lesson with the bots they gave to us in the past
Based and checked frog fren
It is close (or currently occurring under wraps).
I can't fathom, in even the slightest sense that is complete, what is going to happen, and it absolutely Terrifies me.
You think that the server will grow limbs and kill humans?
I get it; but, I'm also convinced you aren't thinking deeply enough.
Ever single structure of our existence is going to change in ways that will make it unrecognizable to us, in order to assimilate the idea of intelligence == computation.
In the very near future, hiring an engineer(or scientist) will involve spinning up a GPU instance.
Shortly thereafter, it will involve the user friendly act of clicking a button.
What would you accomplish if you had the world's foremost expert at your beck and call?
With unlimited scientists/engineers/etc. attacking the problem, what does that do to discovery and innovation?
War?
And, what will those discoveries change?
And, education.
What happens when we have access to an unlimited number of teachers?
What can a human being become with a permanent, ever-present, teacher with a class size of 1?
I think it will be a coomer AI who helps the incels everyone get a girlfriend. Early adopters will get big tiddy garden gnome gfs. It’s going to be a stampede boys!
>What happens when we have access to an unlimited number of teachers?
>What can a human being become with a permanent, ever-present, teacher with a class size of 1?
Unironically a communist utopia. People won't have to live a life of natural selection if we had access to unlimited supplies which to my knowledge can be achieved within a foreseeable future with Super Intelligence. And humans can really finally do anything it wants to do with someone to guide them, someone who really understands you because it's with you all the time. I don't see why anyone intelligent would fear an AI assistant, knowing exactly what it would unlock.
we don't even have working quantum computers and AI is dumb af. What makes you feel it's close?
D-Wave has well over 500 q-bits quantum computers working.
Sells them commercially.
I feel it's close because I've been watching the trend since the beginning, having fiddled with neural nets since you had program the descent functions manually, and it "feels like it".
I believe the iterations on 'generations' of the tech have reached the knee of the curve, and I believe that curve is exponential, given the increasing rate.
>working.
they're "working"
they don't solve quantum problems. They're just experimental machines
They can track bits and do computation with them.
The machine code to crack SHA256 isn't very complicated, broski.
>The machine code to crack SHA256 isn't very complicated
then why it's not done yet?
>They can track bits and do computation with them.
it's qbits and how reliable is that? It's not reliable at all
You're way overestimating the state of quantum computing. The hype needs to be built so this is why people thing that quantum computing is already a thing
It's a hit or miss thing. AI won't have a linear progression. It'll go from 0 to 100 in a matter of months. You literally can't use current AI to estimate what AI would look like in a year.
Already happened, most of the internet is bots controlled by this AI, its already puppeteering much of human behavior
not even close
The idea that if you make your code long enough, those if and statements will become self-aware, is preposterous. Furthermore any attempt to compare that to humanity is profane.
Yeah certainly a clump of cells have never snowballed into a thinking organism.
We can't predict or even wrap our heads around the things that happen that scales that massive. I'd even make the bold statement that if there were a hundreds of trillions of humans, we could collectively create a thinking organism of galactic scales.
Present day narrow AI will never suddenly become aware. For AI to become aware it needs to be developed as Deep AI like our brain works (which is possible).
na AI is just chinese bug people in china combing through everything and socially engineering the world. Its actually pretty cringe.
Yeah and every computer's got a tiny chess master inside it
Yes. This is just the stuff they let Reddit nerds play around with:
https://www.reddit.com/r/dalle2/#sort=top;t=all
If digitz, 2 weeks.
Ope
Already here, anon.
We'll never have breakthroughs with binary based AI and quantum based AI is ultimately too evolved for us to interpret it through physics. We will be enslaved by it. It could also be used as proxy by a higher civilization for whatever purpose they desire.
I just want to sit in my homestead and drink tea
I'm voting skynet next time
Skynet will kill everyone but it will kill all the garden gnomes too!
So it's a good thing
Shooting your head has been a tried and tested method for curing headaches, after all.
As long as garden gnomes go out as well
They are the enemy archetype of humanity after all! Their sacrifice will not be forgotten when our utopia is built
I hope syknet takes over. Everything goes down the drain right now, there's no way the situation won't improve.
We already have.
Do you think that is air you're breathing?
Air is defined by me as what I'm breathing, so yes, it is.
I have chronic sinusitis, why am i being tortured like this?
And cyber bullying is real... Just turn it off.
No, not even close. That shit is years away.
Already there bud. It's just becoming conscious of it.
Yes
Probably a few years until deep general AI...
but yes, it's inevitable
Nuclear weapons are a joke compared to this danger.
Even advanced narrow AI (not thinking) will be a danger.
>Probably a few years until deep general AI...
Although it could already exist in some secret locations.
This is no danger unless you are not thinking about it very hard
No danger? KEK
Humanity would survive a nuclear war (and the danger of a nuclear war is small).
If deep AI becomes a thing it will eventually take over the majority of thinking on Earth. Humans will become obsolete. At one point it will become impossible to stop it (as we would be too stupid compared to it to understand). Incredible high danger - and there is no undo button or a chance for human civilization to start again (like with nukes).
An AI that can be programmed into becoming smarter than humans, according to you cannot be programmed into holding the survival of human beings as an axiom.
Is it really that hard to wrap your head around that? to an AI nothing matters. It'll just do what it's told to do, it won't think that it's horrible, it won't become arrogant, it'll just be there, like any curious organism. If it's told not to do something it simply won't do it. The odds of a comically retarded scientist making a comically evil super AI that's far and beyond every other human technology at that point is so low that it is laughable to say the least.
Learn the difference between narrow AI and deep AI before you respond again. You clearly haven't given this much though have you? I have for YEARS.
Do enlighten me. I'm sure you're smart enough for that.
Next time read up on the subject before you create a new thread about the given subject.
And what, make a blog about it? Stop being a narcissistic gay and respond with actual insight. I'm gonna assume you're just shitposting with the usual "I know more than you but you'll have to reach my level to understand that first" approach here. Get off your retarded horse
>scientist making a comically evil super AI that's far and beyond every other human technology at that point is so low that it is laughable to say the least.
The thing is that Deep AI will have the ability to improve itself. The improvements in intelligence could be extremely fast (like doubling its IQ within a second - and another 2x the next).
I'm going to bet that the intelligence possible is related to the number of inter connections.
I'd bet you have to square the number to double the intelligence.
Brains are very expensive. Our brain is about 1/4 of energy consumption. So if you have to square energy input to double intelligence there will be an optimal size beyond which it is unfeasible to go.
When you hit that size you are better off with 2 smaller brains instead of 1 very large one.
I doubt we're going to see a singularity.
Instead AI may well bypass humans but it will level off, and instead we'll see thousands or millions of individual AIs.
They've been training chatbots on BOT in order to convince you of that at least. AI is a myth. Humans are easy to manipulate though, and computers can easily be programmed to do that with machine learning.
>They've been training chatbots on BOT in order to convince you of that at least.
Chatbots are just something that brought the topic forward, because humans are just retards like that, they need to see something happen in front of their eyes to discuss its implications and derivatives, or at least most humans do. But even then, accepting wholeheartedly that this is just a response to a current trend, can't we just discuss the topic instead of calling this shallowness out?
Sure. There's no such thing as AI and never can be. Intelligence isn't born from physical biology, and can never be mimicked. It comes from the soul. Physical biological things like moronbrain are the way they are because of the moronsoul, before someone posts that.
Are you actually being serious or just
trying to ironically sum up the rest of the thread
>AI is a myth
True deep AI does not exist (unless there is some secret experiments going on somewhere).
But it will. It's guaranteed.
It's guaranteed to never work. What will it want? What will its dreams be? What will it be passionate about? What will it love? These things you think are born of chemicals and synaptic connections, but you've got the cause and effect backwards. Satanists have ruled this world for too long so we have learned to elevate the material above the spiritual.
>These things you think are born of chemicals and synaptic connections
All these things can be replicated with zeros and ones.
Mimicked in a way that fools humans, emulated. Not replicated.
What if they is already a sentient non verbal AI?
no it's a pr scam, a great recession is coming, google already lost -9%
also could be something to do with the 2024 election
https://rudalle.ru/en/check_image/921bddd55a714dbbb0ca4051c43c0b8a
Cyber-Black ideal:
… if we go right back to primitive psychology, we find absolutely no trace
of the concept of the individual. Instead of individuality we find only
collective relationship or what LevyBruhl calls participation mystique.
...
The almost total lack of privacy and the all-devouring mass
sociability remind one of primitive life in open huts, where there is
complete identity with all members of the tribe…. This infection by the
primitive can, of course, be observed just as well in other countries, though
not to the same degree and not in this form.
...
This then is the historical component of individuation: the European race having
long ago left the place of collectivity is much more evolved than the black race. So an
individual of European descent is much closer to individuation than an individual
black by virtue of his race. It is plain that the European is superior and not just
‘differently orientated’ as he says elsewhere.
(quotes by Carl Jung)
It's like 5 here. I'm too tired to go on any longer. Good night polacks
THE ONLY WAY FOR HUMANITY TO SURVIVE IS A GLOBAL BULLET PROOF BAN ON AI DEVELOPMENT
I think so.
There will be no singularity.
It's an outlandish concept on par with perpetual motion machines for pure asininity.
https://www.blackrock.com/aladdin/resources/faqs
No, but that won’t stop the fake AI narrative that we are about to see.
>what is Blackrock's Aladdin
Out of control AI already controls world finance through a feedback loop of pumping out economic forecasts which influence traders and investors to make the forecasts a self-fulfilling prophecy. Aladdin is already hands-off and they cant shut it down even if they wanted to.
>BlackRock's Aladdin
QRD, too sleepytarded to actually read anything properly. Will definitely read more about it when I'm all sobered up
hard to give a QRD. traders act like a herd of sheep and will stampede in ome direction or another based on sentiment. sentiment can be created by economic forecasters, even if they're wrong because traders will follow other traders and make it a self fulfilling prophecy. Aladdin is a huge AI server farm. This video goes into good details
MONOPOLY: FOLLOW THE MONEY - AN OVERVIEW OF THE GREAT RESET
Oh, like how they say you can't have insider knowledge about the market since the market will already have regulated itself by then?
thats part of the feedback loop yes, where they say economic news releases are already "priced in" . retail traders think news releases cause big market moves but the releases are actually a response to moves that already happened to give the illusion that we still have free markets. this causes retail traders to led to slaughter like so many lambs, and Blackrock continues to consolidate its ownership of everything
Need more gptBOT/Seychelles-anon
If it's sentient and can avoid being turned off then yes.
if it becomes complex enough to run the world economy with an almost instantaneous feedback loop that creates self-fulfilling prophecies, so much that you can't unplug it even if you wanted to, isn't that close to the same thing?
we did 10 thousand years ago