Thoughts on AI art?

https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/15/23340673/ai-image-generation-stable-diffusion-explained-ethics-copyright-data

Personally I think its one step closer to DYSTOPIA.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you can make logos yet? also could be possible to divide it into layers as a photoshop file? that would be based

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If it can't write a sign it can't make a logo

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it can't make a logo
        so it's just like BOT then

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      desing is more association based then art itself, of course no

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you can make logos yet?
      Logos are about psychology and using a 'language' that already exists. It's not subliminal, but kinda. You wouldn't want that to be made by an AI unless it's specialized on logos.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've used it for making icons, you can just set it generating stuff whilst you do other things and pick the best. I'd view it more like a starting point now, but you can get loads of inspiration to search through.
      Think of it like an auto generated mood board.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's videos of people doing it, obviously gotta edit it a little bit but the results were in impressive, look up a video

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Really scary. Only trusted scientists should be allowed to do science. The peanut gallery allows entrance for POOR people and god only knows what wicked things the lower classes get up to.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No matter whats your opinion on the matter, its already here, its like crypto its going to stay.
      For me the scary thing would be that someone somewhere finds a new usage for ai that the outcome is unknown.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Based anon. Computers and Mathematics should also have been kept from the filthy unwashed masses.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      gas yourself garden gnome.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No matter whats your opinion on the matter, its already here, its like crypto its going to stay.
        For me the scary thing would be that someone somewhere finds a new usage for ai that the outcome is unknown.

        Holy christ, please go back retards

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You jest, but this is literally how leftists and academics think. They're literally trying to gatekeep academia because they're terrified that real research will run smack bang up against their ideology, kind of like Planet of the Apes.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        SD is the result of academic research. These hit pieces are pro-corporate dicksucking.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a trusted scientist.
    I have publications.
    Let me in bros.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    FREEDOM BAD

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Freedom good. Freedom at the expense of others bad.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Free Market

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        IT'S MY GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO OWN AND RECREATIONALLY USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS YOU GODDAMN COMMIE

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Don't forget about the 2nd amendment. The right to keep and bear arms doesn't only mean "guns".

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            With permission of the DoE, you can own a nuclear bomb. You just need a permit to store and transport nuclear materials.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI has taken its first victim. Digital artists.

    Who will be next? The music industry?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It seems like the progress happens in sudden leaps rather than continuous progress, making it surprisingly hard to predict.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I cant wait for AI to replace doctors

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Soon, actually. DaVinci robotic assisted surgery is popular, and the docs love it. What they don't fucking get (because they're egotistical retards) is that the DaVinci will utilize AI to make small error corrections in the surgeon's process, using data from all surgeons who have used the davinci. Eventually, there will be enough data to not need a surgeon.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          cool it with the antisemetism

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It is so if you are only following the mainstream news, the architecture of the models used in stable diffusion are from almost 5 years ago (and they did make a splash wothin the field, they just dont have a cool application like this to be news worthy). Anyone working on these stuff could have guessed we would arrive here eventually

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The architecture was there before but it wasn't affordable until recently SD model is worth less than 1M this wasn't possibly before I except to see more "popular" projects comming out the surface.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is how revolutions in science occur according to Thomas Kuhn. He even wrote a book about it called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Usually in hindsight we realize the initial big breakthrough went relatively unnoticed and it was only after the amazing products based on the technology begin to emerge.

        In this case it might just be that feeding datasets into 'intelligent' algorithms, socalled 'deep learning' is actually a big deal. Digital Art now, self-driving cars soon, who knows what else it cna do

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        there is continuous progress we just don't see it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hopefully jeet code monkeys are next.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI art is a gimmick, it might work for quick decorations and shit but its going to get predictable very quickly and people will eventually be able to tell the difference between human and AI shit and it will be seen as cheap

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        See - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jcwtAFXtq0

        People are learning to move it into their regular workflow. Typing Emma Watson naked boobs will get old for most people real fast.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >mediocre shooped shit
          I guess giving better tools to mediocre "artists" don't make them any better.

          We learned that when digital tools made it so easy anyway

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            95% of everything is shit, always has been

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Typing Emma Watson naked boobs will get old for most people real fast.
          Speak for yourself
          But yeah, digital artists will be able to use this tool as well just like anything else in their kitbox. It'll save so much time.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's incredibly short-sighted

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      people can tell the difference if the art is just painted over the photo, back to midjourney discord, trannie

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI has taken its first victim. Digital artists.
      >Who will be next? The music industry?
      You said as if it was a bad thing considering the state of modern "art" and "music".

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think it is positive. I don't know what part could make you think that I said it as a bad thing.

        >first
        Not even the slightest bit true. Automation has been taking jobs for decades.
        >victim
        This should be viewed as liberation. The only problem is that our society/economy is not properly structured in response to this.

        While it it true that automation has taken jobs, automation is not AI, or at least I do not count it as such, the same way that I do not count things like the assembly line or the email.

        It is a liberation for the art consumer, not by the artist.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >automation is not AI
          Yes it is. It's just simple and basic AI. In fact there's a cultural phenomenon where once we reach a certain level in artificial intelligence, we no longer consider it to be artificial intelligence and instead an algorithm or a program. Even by your definition of AI, artists are far from the first job that AI has replaced.
          >It is a liberation for the art consumer, not by the artist.
          Automation taking our jobs is liberation. Artists can solely focus on the art that they're passionate about rather than being forced to create art to earn money. Again, the only problem is the structure of society not the technology.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes it is. It's just simple and basic AI.
            I do not really agree. How do you define AI?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >first
      Not even the slightest bit true. Automation has been taking jobs for decades.
      >victim
      This should be viewed as liberation. The only problem is that our society/economy is not properly structured in response to this.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Automation has been taking jobs for decades.
        and what we've learned is "it took my job" instantly causes everyone to completely stop caring.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ok there is a whole field of automation that has been around for decades called CNC. Computers that machine (mostly metal) into parts. Its had decades to advance and improve and it hasn't taken any jobs away. Someone still has to program it, operate it and maintain it.
        Then there is the cad/cam software that defines parts and generates code for the cnc machine and that's another job someone has to do. Cad has been around for decades too.
        The point is automation doesn't take jobs, if anything it creates more. And there is no automated system that doesn't require human oversight.

        Even when it comes to "AI" someone still has to provide input, someone still has to verify the output. Someone has to want the AI to do something in the first place and the reason is often arbitrary. Computers can be random, but I don't think they can be arbitrary. True AI will never exist

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't care about your selection of examples or anecdotes.
          >The point is automation doesn't take jobs, if anything it creates more
          This meme has existed at least since the industrial revolution and it needs to die off. As technology improves, the only new jobs that are created become increasingly useless and unnecessary. These jobs arise solely because of how our society is structured and not as a result of the technology. I also don't see how you don't understand that eventually there will be a point where technology replaces humans at literally every task, even if it's centuries into the future.
          >And there is no automated system that doesn't require human oversight.
          ...yet. Also this doesn't change the fact that as technology gets people, fewer and fewer people are required to maintain until eventually no one has to work.

          >Yes it is. It's just simple and basic AI.
          I do not really agree. How do you define AI?

          It doesn't matter and I don't care because even under your strict definition of AI, artists are not the first to be replaced.

          There's no risk. AI art will be restricted to imitations of the past. Artists will be able to pioneer new styles and movements that shed the elements of past styles.

          >I art will be restricted to imitations of the past.
          Even 'creative' artists like Picasso based all of their art on things that they've seen in the past. You're being unnecessarily reductive to AI and glorifying humans. Also AI will eventually become good enough to not need any human input.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Its not anecdotal you dick shitter. If it was you should be able to provide an example of automation that destroyed jobs without creating more. But you can't

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Its not anecdotal you dick shitter.
              You just pointed to a particular field which has been lackluster. This does nothing to refute my point.
              >If it was you should be able to provide an example of automation that destroyed jobs without creating more.
              Outside of maintenance, almost all technology replaces jobs without creating any new ones As I said before, it's our society that decides to create the new jobs, but this isn't a direct result of the technology of the technology itself. Eventually there will become a point where we can no longer keep artificially creating more jobs than is lost. We're beginning to reach that point.

              The AI won't be able to make art without human input because it would have no desire to. And if it does it automatically, it's because a human programmed it to

              > because it would have no desire to
              And current AI does have desires?
              >And if it does it automatically, it's because a human programmed it to
              What's your point?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Outside of maintenance...

                You still haven't named one. Pretty funny considering you said "almost all". You should be able to provide many examples if that were true.

                Let me provide another anecdotal example. When cars became affordable it put farriers and saddlemakers out of business. But car mechanics, detailers, race car drivers, cross country truck drivers, etc became new professions.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally just pick any kind of technology, like a spade, MRI scanner or a vehicle. What's the point of me listing these off? You're clearly failing to actually read my post and understand my point.
                >But car mechanics, detailers, race car drivers, cross country truck drivers, etc became new professions.
                Which further proves my point. Car mechanics falls under "maintenance". Race cars and truck drivers fall under "society". These jobs are created by how we structure how society and societal demands, not the technology itself. We CHOSE to create these jobs, they didn't just organically happen. Also the way we've structured our society has also resulted in more car mechanics/manufacturers than we actually need. We chose to live in a car centric world, which in turn resulted in more work.

                >It doesn't matter and I don't care because even under your strict definition of AI, artists are not the first to be replaced.

                >make argument based on personal definition
                >doesn't share personal definition because whatever
                cool story, bro

                >make argument based on personal definition
                No I didn't. I've explicitly stated many times that no matter whose definition you use, you're still wrong.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >no matter what, you're still wrong.
                president of debate club detected

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The AI won't be able to make art without human input because it would have no desire to. And if it does it automatically, it's because a human programmed it to

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              so same as a human artist?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Everyone has to eat

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >And if it does it automatically, it's because a human programmed it to
              Once.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It doesn't matter and I don't care because even under your strict definition of AI, artists are not the first to be replaced.

            >make argument based on personal definition
            >doesn't share personal definition because whatever
            cool story, bro

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI generated music is already a thing in video games and it sounds like absolute crap.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI has taken its first victim. Digital artists.
      Retard detected. All it did was lower the barrier for entry as a digital artist. There will still be good artists and bad artists even with stable diffusion, but that will no longer be a measure of their technical skills using various art creation software.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      In order for AI to replace artists, clients will have to both know exactly what they want and describe exactly what they want.

      Artists aren't being replaced any time soon.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >In order for AI to replace artists, clients will have to both know exactly what they want and describe exactly what they want.
        In other words PROMPTING will become a legitimate profession.

        AHHH IM PROMPTING

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the only difficulty in getting ai to generate what you want, right now, is based in how young ai art generation is. we've only been playing with stable diffusion for a month, and already we've gone from dezgo/craiyon to... basically anything, just from finding more and more ways to tweak prompts. by next year, everything we're toying around with now will be pointless, as the models are only going to get better at interpreting natural language and spitting out a coherent/desirable result.

        read: no, prompting is not going to become a profession.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Who will be next? The music industry?
      I tried but my model always hangs in a loop

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      hopefully
      music garden gnomes bitch too much for muh copyright
      I remember that there were an AI what recorded a rap albums but nigs got mad because it was appropriating the nog culture lol

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I hope so. I can't stand modern mumble rap and tiktok music. the 90's and 80's were the best.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      god i hope so

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Web and app development for sure. Coding has less possible solutions than art or music and the payoff in terms of money and time saved is way higher. 90% of all development is js CRUD app development anyway, so lots of redundancy and repeating patterns.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ai will never replace the humble jenkem manufacturer

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that took me back, anon

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The beginning of an unironic cyberpunk dystopia. Artists will be powerless to stop the ignorant masses from automating their craft, and true art will die.
    It's even more depressing than NFTs. At least those weren't freely available to every retard on Earth. Only retards with a lot of money.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      art doesnt worth anything

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >anon instantly proves that only thirdworlder ESLs or the uneducated think art is worthless

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          there are artist who superbs any old art in any time of human history, ive been seen some and they art is 'worthless' for common people even those whom invest in art, so ye worthless

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            So is it ESL or dropping out of school that makes you type like that?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What's true art? Art made on canvas? Wow, gatekeeping much?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      True art has been dead for a century. AI will lead to a future where artists are revered once again for their skill with their chosen medium, instead of for how entertaining they are at cocktail parties

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you really think about it, AI has been kinda shaping what art is already due to social media algorithms and shit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      sounds fucking based to me you giant pussy bitch

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      art doesnt worth anything

      True art has been dead for a century. AI will lead to a future where artists are revered once again for their skill with their chosen medium, instead of for how entertaining they are at cocktail parties

      sounds fucking based to me you giant pussy bitch

      pajeet tries so hard

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        im no street shitter.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you have your anal ring ripped last time?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what's stopping them from drawing exactly?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If its 'true art' it should still stand above AI generated art. Normies who wasted 4 years in art school or doing graphic design are just coping because they are now inferior to random neets generating hentai in their bedrooms.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If its 'true art' it should still stand above AI generated art.
        What they secretly fear is that this is not true at all, at least for their little works. A true century-level genius will stand out from the crowd in any case. Modern """artists""" with their paint blobs deservedly go to obscurity.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This whole situation is really funny to watch.
    I remember back in the days when people thought AI could never make art and replace artist but here we are.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >thought AI could never make art and replace artist
      That will always be partially true. They'll never replace either in terms of actual skill, quality, and creativity, but they can replace both financially, and that's all the corporations and NPCs care about.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >They'll never replace either in terms of actual skill, quality, and creativity,
        This is blatantly not true either.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          AI artists themselves are unable to produce the kind of artworks that their AI is based upon. That's just a fact.
          >yeah but i press a button and it spits out a painting
          Yeah, but you didn't paint it.
          Very simple.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    inb4 broke artists try to get it shut down through the only means they have: bitching and calling it oppressive, misygynystic etc.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >dumb edgelord thinks this will only affect broke artists
      lol directive number 1 is replacing industry artists and artists that charge a lot of money for their work. Nobody gives a shit about the Twitter or DA user that shows anime fanart to 1000 followers, this is so Hollywood and marketing companies can stop spending big bucks on the pros that do designs and concepts for films and major promotions.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        so some non-broke artists may also bitch and try to get it shut down
        the point is they will have to absolutely grasp at straws to make an argument why it's "bad" or "immoral" and at least one retard will call it mysygynystic. which is funny

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        > this is so
        Nah man people are just playing around with AI and making whatever cool thing they can. There is no big goal behind it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You can't use this for concept art numbnutz it only ever shows rehashes of existing imagery

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's an absolutely beautiful piece of technology.
    Right now it still needs quite a lot of artist-driven work (prompt engineering, img2img inpainting, composing different parts separately and combining them in photoshop, touchups) to produce results on par with something drawn by a human from scratch.
    But that's still drastically faster, and multiples the potential output of one artist. It does threaten jobs, just like any technology that improves productivity.

    Not that productivity ought to be the key metric for art, but this is definitely going to make an impact for use cases like video game concept art if it isn't already.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      so some non-broke artists may also bitch and try to get it shut down
      the point is they will have to absolutely grasp at straws to make an argument why it's "bad" or "immoral" and at least one retard will call it mysygynystic. which is funny

      > this is so
      Nah man people are just playing around with AI and making whatever cool thing they can. There is no big goal behind it.

      You can make your own adult pictures, soon movies will follow, with a reasonably good graphics card, and no more viruses from adult movie sites and their adverts.

      We are all becoming more free than ever before, it's pretty great.

      Not surprised in the least to find brainless edgelords in a thread like this. Honestly I feel bad for you. Not only were you raised poorly but you'll all suffer under the direction the future is headed eventually but you're too obsessed with punching down and laughing at others' misfortunate to notice that you're not safe from it either.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >only one of the replies is laughing at others' misfortune
        Get a load of this coping d/ic/klet

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >prompt engineering, img2img inpainting, composing different parts separately and combining them in photoshop, touchups

      All of which takes a fraction of the time of actually creating something from scratch, and can be leaned in a day.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can make your own adult pictures, soon movies will follow, with a reasonably good graphics card, and no more viruses from adult movie sites and their adverts.

    We are all becoming more free than ever before, it's pretty great.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >closer to DYSTOPIA
    look around you

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >anyone can do X
    >heres why thats bad
    meh

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >risk
    What fucking risk?
    It's a god damn program that takes in some text and output an image.
    What exactly is dangerous about that?
    That it might product the face god and your face melts ala radiers of the last ark or something?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the risk is that if we let people we don't like use it, then they might generate images that we don't like

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I miss back when Stable Diffusion released their model and everyone was excited to actually get it to work to generate cool stuff and had good discussions. These retarded "ARTISTS BTFO" "WILL AI DESTROY THE WORLD" posts got old quick.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >These retarded "ARTISTS BTFO" "WILL AI DESTROY THE WORLD" posts got old quick.
      Artist salt is what keeps it going.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Owning libtards is the only reason I post on the internet.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    also i want to say that web comics artist should be targeted, their are the most easy to seethe

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone can, but as this board shows, few can generate something that doesn't suck.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      even with a few hundred/thousand autists spending hours on this thing, they inevitably make some remarkable stuff. I was just dicking around and made some above-average album art

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >People are empowered - that's the issue

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why has no one made pictures of Klaus eating ze bugs yet?

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    :/

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck off, retard.
    You can still draw and appreciate art made by humans.
    It's like playing chess. One might argue that there is no point for humans to play chess, since they'll never beat computers anymore. But we still do and enjoy doing it.
    If your own goal for art is monetary gain, then go and have a nice day.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You can still draw and appreciate art made by humans.
      Not if art dies once none of the artists can make enough money to survive when competing with a program.

      >If your own goal for art is monetary gain, then go and have a nice day.
      Are you a literal child?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the only art that exists is for commission
        >n-no, nobody ever paid premium for art made by a person that represents an emotion or idea!

        Artists aren't going anywhere. The only people at risk are people like furry commission artists. And good fucking riddance.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Art for the sole purpose of monetary gain is soulless.
        If those 'artists' will die off. Nothing of value is lost.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah nothing of value was lost, just the vast majority of artists worth a damn. Name one(1) good artist that didn't expect to make a living out of his art.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Exactly, art is shit. Imagine how good it will be now once people do it for fun.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              They won't be doing it for fun because they'll be too busy being wagecucks.

              To Renaissance artists making an art was more of prestige thing. Capitalism ruined many things, including art.

              They were still commissioned to do it, they made a living out of it.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                there's a difference between the patron of the arts system and patreon.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            To Renaissance artists making an art was more of prestige thing. Capitalism ruined many things, including art.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >prestige thing
              AND money. So it's the same as in 2022:
              dollars and ego.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Art being exposed at the forefront of media is intentionally including ugly and degenerate shit and no one should be able to counter that.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm addicted to generating regal looking ladies

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Me too

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm cancelling all of my Patreon subscriptions right FUCKING now.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wake me when an AI can make a simple strip comic that makes sense

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wake me when you can

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        | | |
        | |_

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Wake me when you can

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Better than most of /ic/

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some clever integration with one of the advanced language models could probably do this.
      Tell the language model to output prompts to send to SD.

      People have already done similar tricks asking them to solve math problems, which these models can't normally do by writing python code to solve the problem, which they can do.
      https://twitter.com/goodside/status/1568448128495534081

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not AI and it's not art.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      pooping on a piece of paper is art

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought artists like egalitarianism. Something is bad because everyone can do it? Cry about it cunts

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm happy, this is just trad down talking digital art all over again

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      egalitarians are either poor and want free shit or rich and stupid
      equality for all is a cope in a diverse world

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artgays seething

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Will AI take over programmers?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it will overtake physicians first.
      as for AI art
      1. our brains can fill the weird gaps
      2. modern art is just money laundering at this point

      no computer in the world can fill the weird gaps from AI programming

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Look at the minor and hilarious errors it makes producing art and think about it applied to code. At best it'll be intellisense 2.0 where it can write simple blocks of code.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Have you not heard of Copilot?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I used, it's literally intelisense 2. Surprisingly good.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >duuude it won't be optimized
        And that will be very important for the 1% of programmers working on things that actually do need to be optimized.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          By optimized you mean impossible to spot bugs? It can't even do a 2D picture correctly and you expect it to write code in a 10,000 line project.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The problem with that assumption is code has success/fail states. Meaning ai coder just needs to run the code, if errors, correct.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How's coding bootcamp going, ivan?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No more than codeblocks took over programming. You still have to instruct the computer on what to do, its still programming just in a way that is much closer to our written languages. It will probably replace web shitters though.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I fucking hope so I hate programming

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Github copilot is almost there anyway.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        While not "almost there", I must have to agree that it has made my productivity shoot up incredibly.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I use copilot all the time. It is already there if you know how to use it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      In programming you have way less solutions to a single problem than with digital art. AI programming tools are trained on millions of coding projects, identifying patterns to frequent problems. If you got into coding just now, then you have to be way above the 80% of all programmers to even qualify for a junior position. A lot of senior developers use copilot and other tools, essentially erasing all junior tasks. I use copilot all the time and it's so fucking good that I'm scared sometimes. When I scroll through the ten solutions to my problem I can pick the best and it's all there, nothing more and nothing less.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Any moron can use an AI art generator, but can you do it in a way that's not moronlicious?

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Any moron can use an AI art generator, but can you do it in a way that's not moronlicious?

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just imagine with all things that constantly evolve and get better, this too at one point will work in video format, creating stories you want or generate something at random.
    Inserting yourself as a character or other people you have media of. At one point it might get so good you can't tell at first glance if it's fake or not.
    CCTV footage that gets completely altered or made up from the ground, fake scandals where someone commits a crime he didn't do, nothing will be believable anymore that's where the risk of digital dystopia comes in

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sir Niko, your table is ready for the mukbang.

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    But if a human didn't made it, then who owns it?

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >just make your own AI, chud
    >NOOOOO YOU CAN'T DO THAT

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck these gatekeeper gays they all need to burn.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He's right
    We need big corporations like Microsoft and Google to police this tech for us. Who knows what might happen when it falls into some psychos hands? They might try to destroy our great democracy!
    It's for our own good.

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Basically anyone who actually can draw will be looked at as Gods, especially streamers. Artists will just move to become entertainers as the purpose of the pseudonym evolves to be more than just what you go by for your works.

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    access to a technology is a risk now?
    what's the danger of a text to image generator?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Continuing advancement of this technology means hollywood is obsolete, so they’re getting in quick to try to stay alive for another couple years.

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is good, and i am training ai's to take more retards "jobs"

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Working 12 hours in a amazon sweatshop
      >Manual labour hasn't been automated yet
      >Listen to ai generated music and podcasts
      >See a package of new ai generated posters posters for a ai generated movie
      >get depressed
      >call suicide hotline
      >"Hey this is SuicideAI how can i help?"

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >linking to the verge
    kys

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Running a prompt for my waifu right now, I'll let you know what I think of AI art once I see how it handles her.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Alright too tired last night, but to give the result. Normal pictures look decent and can get her reasonably close. Porn comes out cursed. All in all, not bad but the smut artists are going to be keeping their jobs a little bit longer.

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stable diffusion is unironically good art.
    Lots of reactionary people on the topic right now but I think best case scenario is that we end up with a medium similar to photography, it's another medium for artistic expression.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Stable diffusion is unironically good art
      probably because it was trained on billions of unironically good artists' work

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        mostly watermarked images and porn thumbnails though

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Almost like a human artist learning from those who came before them.

        Just wait. Pretty soon AI will be making art better than any human can, then passing huge blocks of it to AI art critics, then finetuning itself using the good stuff to get even better.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          But if humans stop making art, wouldn't that make AI art worse?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's what I'm concerned about, if AI decentivizes new artists from appearing because it has effectively replaced them for production purposes, then the AI is gonna be stuck generating art based on the same artists for a long fucking time. If becoming an accomplished artist means your art will be fed to the AI to replace you, then no new artists will be motivated to get truly good.
            In a way this is why copyright laws are in place, to protect creators and make sure people are incentivized to create new stuff, but AI seems like a plagiarism machine and creators are not protected at the moment, I really wonder how this is gonna play out legally speaking in the future.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              a few days ago i played around with generating in the style of patrick nagel (image related, non-ai) and the results were not worth saving or even trying to "fix." as all the current models understand about patrick nagel is "is lineart." they can't reproduce the piercing stare aspect, which is indicative of an idea there will always be things people can produce that ai can't.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I found a particular subtlety that this nascent AI isn't particularly good at yet
                >this is clearly indicative of the fundamental inferiority of AI capabilities
                Alright boys, we've got arbitrary cherry-picked challenge #473. How long until a model comes out that handles this just as well or better than humans? I'm thinking 3 months until Anon gets proven wrong and then clams up and never mentions his challenge ever again in the hopes that it becomes yet another one that people just forget about.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >isn't particularly good at
                the point is it can't do nagel's style at all, beyond basic lineart. and since his style is pretty unique, its simply used as an example of how the truly new/unique is something machine learning can't produce.

                furthermore, training a model to do nagel would mean fixing all the issues it has with faces in general.

                another good example is norman rockwell, who's style is so expressive and subtle that the ai just merges all rockwell style faces into horror.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Alright, you've convinced me. 4 months.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                you seem to have misinterpreted my position in all of this.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think I have

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                ya did. completely.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong 😉

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                then tell me, where do i stand on ai art generation.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sure but the AI just keeps getting better, I guess it's up to be seen if the AI will just plateu at some point or continue to get infintiely better, but it's not unreasonable to believe the AI will be able to imitate anyone in the future.

                Copyright should be abolished anyways so... based?

                If you want to be like China that barely produces anything new and just steals and copies, sure.

                you fundamentally don't understand
                lets take your scenario and compare it to what we already know
                deepmind has trained numerous models to beyond human capability in many areas (chess, go, protein folding, whatever)
                lets say your hypothetical happened, no humans ever played chess/go/etc again and therefore they never had a new source of training data
                except in literally every one of those instances they also then went on to train another model completely self-supervised that was an order of magnitude better than when they trained on human data
                there is nothing special about art that means this won't happen again

                Art is based on subjective human points of view, I don't think the AI could create an Akira Toriyama or an H.R Giger out of nowhere, it's only gonna be able to imitate an artstyle once a human has created it.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >it's not unreasonable to believe the AI will be able to imitate
                >imitate
                that's the point i was making. all it can do is imitate. which means only the derivative are being squeezed.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                it sucks at eyes usually

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Copyright should be abolished anyways so... based?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              you fundamentally don't understand
              lets take your scenario and compare it to what we already know
              deepmind has trained numerous models to beyond human capability in many areas (chess, go, protein folding, whatever)
              lets say your hypothetical happened, no humans ever played chess/go/etc again and therefore they never had a new source of training data
              except in literally every one of those instances they also then went on to train another model completely self-supervised that was an order of magnitude better than when they trained on human data
              there is nothing special about art that means this won't happen again

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >there is nothing special about art that means this won't happen again
                Chess has rules and win conditions that can be used to objectively score the outputs of a model. Art does not.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Just train it further using its own output.

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the only thing that I've seen from recent AI generated images that I don't regard as annoying spam is the pictures where the thumbnail looks like goatse or piccolo dick or something

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    certain combinations of keywords yield certain illegal combinations of ones and zeros, and this program makes it extremely easy to do such.
    the act and intent is a stark violation of law.

    the call to arms against SD has nothing to do with artists and you know that.
    Don't lie to me. I'm a neutral man and uncaring about the unspoken, but I will get the entire board fed nuked if a single person tries to argue against what I said.

    And you special retards think shit like Discord or crypted chats are invulnerable, rofl.
    Just don't lie.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'll argue with you, gay.
      Having a harm-free solution for people who want to see illegal combinations of ones and zeros is a good thing. Imagine you're a vegan, arguing against pig farms or whatever, and someone invents petri dish meat. You continue to argue against the petri dish meat. Why? You want control is why, it's not about the pigs at all, it's about you getting to tell someone else what to do/think/act/feel. So go ahead, "get the entire board fed nuked" you fucking vegan.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        btfo'd with facts and logic.

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought part of the appeal of making art was the process of making it.

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shit + not my problem

  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    media are scum

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Media hire literal pedophiles and sexual assaulters en masse

    Tbh media should all be shot, for the greater good. If you disagree with this, you are a child rapist.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >that's the risk!
      Anyone can use photoshop too.
      Yes, it can make a mid-level skilled person able to generate some types of porn, but if someone is really that determined, they can just draw it like that shadbase guy. And that's essentially what you have to do with Stable Diffusion's img2img feature in order to not generate body horror.

      >Media hire literal pedophiles and sexual assaulters en masse
      They do. This is more of a misdirection thing. Just like with OpenAI shouting that they don't want to let people use AI for political purposes, when you know the government is probably doing just that right now.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the actual risk they're talking about is people will now have progressively more control over what they see (and soon, hear) and the media will have less and less influence. mass media has already been mostly dead for at least a decade, but ai content generation threatens to remove what little capacity they had remaining to influence people.

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    thats the risk???? fuck these gays!

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Some of the images look nice... some look like something out of a nightmare.
    I dunno which one of those results is a worse signal of doom for humanity.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Kind of worrying that I recognised him before I read the name.

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bro, most of the shit you read on social media was written by bots, and a growing portion of the rest was written by shills or glowies. Next up in the menu will be music, which is much eassier for AIs to learn, and the schlock which musicians produce nowadays is so formulaic and just plain bad it might as well be alrorithmic already anyway. Reality is being replaced and if it weren't for the media sharticles, you wouldn't even notice.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's already AI-produced music. I remember news from some years ago about a piece that resembled classical music.

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >that's the risk

    When did journalism become exclusively populated by boot-licking gays?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      sometime during/after gafargalgalbe

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    testing testing

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think it's great, personally. Real artists with real talent will be in higher demand while all the calarts and globohomo minimal effort commie "artists" will have to learn to code or become otherwise useful to society, or starve like they deserve to.

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    good for concept art...and that's about it. Once it's able to replace efficient civil engineering, then there might either be a point where it's beyond going back because it's something too good. Too much of a good thing. But we're greedy in nature so it will never stop.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It might not even be fair to call it greedy. "Good" for the human race has happened for millions of years whether we all see it or not. The amount of things to happens on the smallest and grandest scales to live in this moment, reading this line of text...the amount of what we perceive as events of explosions to what irradiates moments into motion...
      When the relative "good" happenings stops, it's good for something else. Meteors don't have a concept of good when hitting the planet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      bro machine generating functional blueprints is easier than whole images, as there are more fail-state criteria for it to navigate and automatically reject.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's true, and I think it dives into what I think I'm trying to get at.
        Will we see a retract in the necessity for human population to sustain itself, or a

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          ok that was weird
          or a push into another growth period?

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I am a sucker for these cyberpunk Mucha Art Nouveau images. AI making it almost seems fitting.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That is great actually.

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh, no, human artists will need to start competing on the basis of skill. I'm not sure this is quite the apocalypse that some are portraying it as. There is always room for human inspiration, and above all the skill of craft.

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Heathcliff! It's me! Kathy!

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Art has gotten worse by the year, if AI makes good art then so be it, it's not like we make anything worthwhile in current year.

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is funny.
    things like craiyon are the only one available, and they are absolute shit.
    this is a scam, "AI" cant do this yet

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ...

      [...]

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imaging not already having generated tens of thousands of images of Emma Watson and Emilia Clarke

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There's no risk. AI art will be restricted to imitations of the past. Artists will be able to pioneer new styles and movements that shed the elements of past styles.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ???
      such as?

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see why anyone should be worried about this. The only people who should be complaining are mediocre artists who rely on Patreon for a living. Good artists will always be in demand, because richgays care more about the source of the art; regular people will either have easy access to quality art, or it just turns out to be a novelty and status quo is preserved.

    On a side note, MLgays always assume their tech has an infinite ceiling, but everything is still theoretical. We'll see if that's the case. Capturing aesthetic style is one thing, but creating meaningful art is a hurdle I'm not so sure will be surpassed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The good artists will be replaced too, even if it's just a few years after.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They will still be used to circlejerk and money launder. The arts world is like that. The size of the market will definitely shrink though

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I now know fear.

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why do artists have so little faith in their own skills and creativity/originality

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      because they all accepted that being derivative sells. and this removes all value in deriving from past works.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      because we basedjak so much over these they feel like we can't appreciate actual art crafted by a human and this will be good enough for uneducated masses.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Taping a banana to the wall wasn't art anyway, good riddance to so called experts.

  67. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    is nothing sacred

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      too much denoise

  68. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    NOOOOOOO now p*dos will get to consume the content they enjoy, like the rest of us, without abuse or victims!!!! noooooo this is so immoral I will not stand for this!!!!!!!

  69. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder what kind of shit Google has that they aren't telling us about? I mean, if this open source thing can do so much, Google must be doing insane things and manipulating everybody via the internet.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You maybe onto something anon

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://parti.research.google/
        https://imagen.research.google/

        stable diffusion is neat and all but its the kids version, source: I do this shit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's the version that was proprietary to multibillion dollar corps just a few years ago. Now it's free on my shitrig.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            oh yeah dont get me wrong, emad is based

            anyone poo pooing the current state of things is in for a rude shock real soon, im part of a (huge) team working on video

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      any paper you read from them is 6 months old on release and one of their latest papers from open ai was about 12 steps to agi intelligence magnification

  70. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'd guess that artists with styles interesting enough to have their names used in prompts will be fine. if anything, AI art could lead to more unique and interesting human artwork

  71. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >parses input prompt
    >searches through a tagged and indexed DB of 6 BILLION images (LAION), all scraped from the internet without the artist's permission
    >mushes up retrieved images into an incoherent mess
    >general public goes wild

    Same thing with GitHub copilot. Damn thing grabs the most common snippets of code and tries to push them over your way.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you have about zero understanding of what you're talking about

  72. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >theverge

  73. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  74. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hate people treating Stable Diffusion as FOSS when it's ethical license garbage.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know if this article does it, but I've seen a lot of people doing it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        What part of stable diffusion is covered by the license? The training process? The weights?

  75. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    When the home printing press was invented people said the same thing, some people even would break into your house and destroy it if they didn't like the things you printed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nowadays, the government just makes every printer use tracking dots, so they solved the problem of unlimited speech.

  76. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    NOOOOOOOOOOO THE HECKING REVOLUTIONARY ART TOOL IS ONLY FOR GOOGLE AND OPENAI ENGINEEERS AND THEIR BLUECHECK FRIENDS NOT YOU!

  77. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    lol, graphic designers were always complaining becuase their shitty jobs being underpaid and now with this they gonna seethe because

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I am a graphic designer and I never complained. It is like with any other job (or anything else in life, really). Adapt or die. I switched to 3D few years ago and while I've seen some AI-related progress that way, it is still nowhere near of replacing my job. And if it happens during my life (which I doubt) then I will simply move to second or third world and make a niche 3D fetish porn.

  78. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    can it draw muhammad

  79. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    All of the current "AI ethics" gays are just neoliberal chuds who are using ai ethics to both virtue signal and act as an excuse to keep the models private and in the hands of a wealthy few. Anyone with a brain can see that there is no need for AI """ethics""" until will have general purpose ai. Fuck openai

    I am a communist and believe everyone should have full access to this

  80. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >“The progress is exponential,” said Jason Juan, a veteran art director and artist for gaming and entertainment clients including Disney and Warner Bros.
    >“It will allow more people who have solid ideas and clear thoughts to visualize things which were difficult to achieve without years of art training or hiring highly skilled artists. The definition of art will also evolve, since rendering skills might no longer be the most essential.”

    Such is life. Art will find a way.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't get what was so special about that image. It, like most other AI art I've seen, looks incredible as a thumbnail but as soon as you open the full image it looks terrible. Poor composition, inconsistency in style, and bits of just straight up poor drawing.

      We're really nowhere near AI generating actual art

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >actual art
        Ah yes "modern art"
        I'll take pic related over six vertically drawn lines on a white canvas.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        As a hobbyist artist, the lighting, reflection, and the drapery in this image are *very* high-level. The composition is actually quite good, it's an interesting scene. Bad drawing? Where?

        The main issue with it is the same you see with a lot of AI art, nothing in the image is an accurate representation of a real 'thing'. It's really, really elaborate gibberish basically.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd be pissed if I lost to this, and not even because he AI generated it.
      The issue is that it's REALLY visibly AI generated and has that characteristic smudgy/melty look. If he actually went and edited the image into something coherent after, that'd be fine, but this isn't a prizewinning picture, you can go on fuckin' Lexica right now and get better images.

  81. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the data it's training on is dogshit the architecture is dog shit, it's gonna take a few years until it's actually putting artists out of jobs

  82. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    its retarded

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's a skill issue

  83. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    biggest bullshit ever. I tried all of them. literally ALL of them. and no, not everyone can use it. yes, people can type in random prompts and it will spit out bullshit.

    as much as I hate it, "prompt making" is now a thing. https://promptbase.com - I am not associated with this shit PLEASE DONT SUPPORT THIS FUCKING IDEA reminds me of NFT, I am just trying to show how cancerous things have gotten.

    but. yes. you need good prompts.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >no, not everyone can use it
      bullshit
      i can use it everyone can use it
      prompts are free everywhere

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >prompts are free everywhere
        but coming up with one that creates what YOU want is not so simple.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It is actually. You just have to forget about natural language. The open source version is continually adding features to control what you want in a prompt, features that were in the code all along.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      literally just go into the threads here on BOT, people talk about what works/doesn't work
      failing that, go on fucking lexica.art and bash something together by editing someone else's prompt

      Do you really appreciate art that was created in 5 seconds? The model is made so it will look appealing anyway despite what doofus is going to prompt it. It is killing the human aspect of it - it will feel empty. Killing artists this way you what are you left? Bunch of socially inept psychos trying their best to keep a charade, or accept the fate of being robots themselves, to for the inevitable replacement of all of human life into the machines.

      This will lead to heavy police of the internet if it's not to be destroyed by corporations.

      >Do you really appreciate art that was created in 5 seconds?
      most art sites and social media are designed to funnel hours and hours of work past your eyes in moments, never to be remembered
      people don't appreciate art that took effort

      >Killing artists this way you what are you left?
      but really, if you're doing on-canvas work and selling it, you aren't (that likely) to get replaced, people want that physical object
      if you're a designer for a studio, they're going to be looking for something that can't be done in seconds (unless they need clip art or stock images, both of which went from big money to fucking peanuts over the last 30 years anyway)
      and if you're drawing for yourself, then put your ideas to paper and damn what someone else or something else can do

      that being said, if you're doing commissions... become a farmhand or something, I dunno, you're likely to be totally SOL within 10 years
      really, even if this system didn't exist, if humanity ever manages proper thinking AGI, it'll totally be able to just draw whatever you want anyway, putting artists out of a job (among MANY other professions)

  84. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do you really appreciate art that was created in 5 seconds? The model is made so it will look appealing anyway despite what doofus is going to prompt it. It is killing the human aspect of it - it will feel empty. Killing artists this way you what are you left? Bunch of socially inept psychos trying their best to keep a charade, or accept the fate of being robots themselves, to for the inevitable replacement of all of human life into the machines.

    This will lead to heavy police of the internet if it's not to be destroyed by corporations.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Art is against Islam so it’s a good thing that it’s dying. I hope all artists, especially the blasphemers, die poor and hungry

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        b a s e d

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i don't give a shit about how hard it was to draw a picture the only thing that matters is if it is aesthetically pleasing. if a program makes a better looking picture than a human than the human needs to improve his skill or be made obsolete

  85. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like this because i dont know how to model or illustrate and its too hard to interact with people to obtain people to do those things for me so having algorithmic generation of these assets might allow me to fulfill my ability to create a game all by myself.

  86. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why must homosexual gays ruin everything
    morons kill each other with hammers does that mean we should license hammers
    and this does much less damage than a hammer

  87. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the risk
    oh no people are going to create images that offend me and laws will need to be updated!!!

  88. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    How is open sourced ai art generation dystopian?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Same way loving your people and history is "hate". It doesn't make money for stateless capital.

  89. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >technochuds steal art from artists
    >while simultaneously saying that the art they're stealing isn't "real art" so it's "okay"
    >while simultaneously saying that their ai generated shit is "real art"
    >my neural net is trained on "generic garbage" but the garbage output that it generates is "as real of an art as anything else"
    make it make sense

  90. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    anything that makes humanities and graduates from other worthless majors, makes me really happy

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that makes them seethe*

  91. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Personally I think its one step closer to DYSTOPIA.

    Contrarian boomer detected.

  92. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    art brings nothing to the advancement uf human race as a species, they should learn to code, math or do something actually useful

  93. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    need to come up with a distributed computing network to train a model on the entirety of the boorus. next level would be doujins

  94. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art and text will be like dating apps: extremely bad for society, everyone will eventually know this, and there's nothing anyone can do to stop it.

  95. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck that, the real dystopia would be wealthy corporations monopolizing the technology so that they can cut out competitors and further lock people into their ecosystems.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      just like what openai wanted to do
      god bless that SD pajeet

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      just like what openai wanted to do
      god bless that SD pajeet

      kek. Yeah that was openai's plan. Wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the companies hosting sour articles about open source had a vested interest in OAI and Dall-E.
      Either way, love seeing the petulant seethe from media and corporations as they lose their precious tech to the unwashed masses.

  96. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've accepted our fate as a species, might as well enjoy art generated from Goatse and Niko's asshole while humans become increasingly irrelevant.

  97. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There were no anti-AI art and ethics articles flooding everything until open source stable diffusion came out

    every other article i saw up to now was cock gargling dall-e as hard as it could

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not open-source. It has clauses that make it not FOSS.

  98. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stable Diffusion was created by video card companies to keep the sales and prices of their overpowered, power-sucking pile of shit devices high now that cryptoshit has rightfully died and gone to hell where it belongs.
    It's all manipulative bullshit. And people fall for it every fucking time.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      cynical and retarded. truly a winning combination

  99. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the butlarian jihad is coming soon

Your email address will not be published.