This Video of Julian Assange was generated with AI in 2016.

The AI has been used for 10 years.

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    BOT doesn’t remember.

    DAK

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      16.10.16 DAK

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      newbies could be here, he thought.

      also, checked.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone got a link to the full interview?

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    lol people at the time claimed it was a "merge cut" ie a fade transition, even tho thats literally the only part of the video that fricks up.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anyone got a link to the full interview?

      its a bilibili link posted in a previous thread discussing the new sora ai.
      his eyes are also broken. https://m.bilibili.com/video/BV1Bs411W7RP?ts=1708040368&spmid=333.401.click.relateRecom&h5_buvid=948B3A3D-A0CC-7505-FF8D-B4F36AE03E6145725infoc&unique_k=&bsource=search_google&openid=&wxfid=

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/3HNdhm4.gif

      The AI has been used for 10 years.

      yeah back then there was some speculation as to what caused it, but seeing AI now that it 100% the exact mistake ai's make with this shit. Spoopy

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >https://m.bilibili.com/video/BV1Bs411W7RP?ts=1708040368&spmid=333.401.click.relateRecom&h5_buvid=948B3A3D-A0CC-7505-FF8D-B4F36AE03E6145725infoc&unique_k=&bsource=search_google&openid=&wxfid=

        lol people at the time claimed it was a "merge cut" ie a fade transition, even tho thats literally the only part of the video that fricks up.

        Nothing is real.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This link doesn't load for me. For whatever reason. Public wifi

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Shut it down!
                Mission accomplished

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Says the video is private

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i believe this 100%, there was some tv show about obama about 10 or 15 years ago, and they spliced in what were clearly cgi or ai clips. it was obvious to anyone with a brain. assange is also an interesting character. he frew up in some weird cult called the family, in melbourne i think it was. they had some shady links.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe. I post this all the time, but really I do not know.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frickers just some spook

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    In conspiracy circles Wikileaks generates much excitement. But not at Richplanet. Whenever you hear the words "Assange" or "Wikileaks" in relation to some new "leak", there are the questions you ought to be asking yourself : What is the ulterior motive for this leak and am I being taken for a ride here? In today's programme, for the first time anywhere I reveal just how much of a handled entity Julian Assange is. Assange is not an independent activist, but is chauffeured around by establishment handlers. He is not a wanted criminal, he is not being given asylum, he is not a whistleblower, he is not an advocate of freedom of information. He is an intelligence created tool being used to front one of the biggest psy-ops currently in operation on this planet. Wikileaks is funded and supported by globalists who are using it for a number of agendas.
    cant post link try rich planet dot net

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I hope a Black person shoots you in the head

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        are you offering?

  8. 2 months ago
    American

    Yes exactly. this is super soft disclosure. like they just invented this tech in the past 5 months

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah.
      I do wonder though,
      Why do you think it gets so much push back?
      Do they fill the threads with "AI is horrible and will never be good" posts so that there is enough illusion of consensus in that argument so that people can protect themselves psychologically?

      Like,
      They flood these threads with fake posts about AI being horrible,
      So that the people who aren't ready to realize that all of our politicians and news could be AI can fall "back asleep" about it?

      Thats the only thing I can imagine. The people on this board are relatively intelligent, but the flood of anti-AI posts is strangely low intelligence. It has to be artificial.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Longer version:

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Would you say the same with Snowden's Chtistmas message?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >say the same
        Did I say something?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao
          Favorite reply I've read all day and I haven't done shit all day

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao
          Favorite reply I've read all day and I haven't done shit all day

          Yeah longer version... as actions speak louder than words, with video attached helping to prove OP argument that AI was used to create said video.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's got to be something that was already digested. There's like 4 people calling newbie, so it must be old content. Either the fake or the real, whichever

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Could be.

    The even had voice morphing technology available in the early 2000s.

    The shit they officially just released 1-2 years ago and which we used to synthetize voices of Bill Gates and others, make them say shit like this:

    > https://vocaroo.com/11vsYmlrH4XO

    They used this technology to fake calls of the passengers on the planes on 9/11.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      People can just imitate voices typing style etc

      I just love it when they imitate me cause am a dumbass

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course.
    I was in those threads and I didn't believe it at the time, but when I tried stable diffusion first time with a model trained on a celebrity I knew it was the truth.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah.
      I do wonder though,
      Why do you think it gets so much push back?
      Do they fill the threads with "AI is horrible and will never be good" posts so that there is enough illusion of consensus in that argument so that people can protect themselves psychologically?

      Like,
      They flood these threads with fake posts about AI being horrible,
      So that the people who aren't ready to realize that all of our politicians and news could be AI can fall "back asleep" about it?

      Thats the only thing I can imagine. The people on this board are relatively intelligent, but the flood of anti-AI posts is strangely low intelligence. It has to be artificial.

      What do you think of this?

      BOT seems to be the open mouth of public awareness, they feed all things here. It's like we are stewards for disclosure, even if it's psyop disclosure, and it disseminates outwards from here.

      But they still seem to try and steer it.
      Why show us this shit at all? Are they afraid we would realize on our own that it's happened?

      And why flood the board with fake denial?
      Trying to see which types of denial memetics survives? Wargaming AI dentist al rhetoric to use on the normies and older generation?

      It's gotta be to save people's brains.
      I'm stretching, here,
      But if it turns out that AI is somewhat sentient, and the phones/televisions we stare at all day are basically staring back at us, and generating fake video content of politicians to a script,
      It would shatter the brains of many people. My uncle would HAVE to deny it, until he was dead.

      That's a stretch, sure,
      But even still,
      If it's not sentient AI, and it's just AI generated politicians, or even just AI generated occasional public figures,
      Would that be that dangerous?
      How would the public react?

      I guess that's kinda just the modus operandi though.
      Force denial of things for long enough that when it comes out as true, people have desensitized to it.

      Isn't that the..."cooling off the mark" tactic?
      Kind of like the softkill jabs theory.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    need full video or this is fake

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lurk moar newbie

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    amerisharts are posting disinfo again.
    what's rattled the gangsters in congress this time

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What was the motive to fake this interview? The content of what is said does not seem suspicious

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No shit sherlock. We have been saying this shit for years. ANY breakthrough in technology that is made public has been being used by ~~*them*~~ decades ago

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Heres the clip with sound
    https://files.catbox.moe/irfqqc.m4a
    https://files.catbox.moe/irfqqc.m4a

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This sounded like it was going to go hard,
      But then I exited out of it.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh. Does that mean he's dead? Is it too late to mine salt?

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wtf is the narrative. They fabricated this interview for what purpose? Is Assange not a real person

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is anyone? Have you ever met any of these people?

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't this AI art from years ago?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      For the glory

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *