This scored 155 on an IQ test. That’s higher than 99.9% of people on Earth.
ChatGPT 5 will be release this summer. It will be 10x smarter than ChatGPT 4.
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
This scored 155 on an IQ test. Thats higher than 99.9% of people on Earth. ChatGPT 5 will be release this summer.
And?
That’s the big question.
You can increase your IQ a lot just by practicing IQ test questions. IQ is the biggest nothingburger meme ever. Imagine thinking israelites and insectoid chinkchonks are the same as white people just because they have comparable IQs hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahaha.
not really
You absolutely can. Thinking humans can't learn pattern recognition just shows that you're a moron. It's a trait that is relatively easy to learn, it's just too boring for most people to sit down and practice pattern recognition puzzles. You have to be pretty autistic like a chingchong to find it interesting.
You'll hit your upper limit very fast.
Don't believe me? Go ahead and go measure top10 IQ of all time. You can't.
It's usually cope for either very low IQ or maybe even more often for those who are slightly smarter than average, but could never get to the top 2% club.
T. >135
>T. >135
Of course, you are. You can't just lie on the Internet, why would you do that?
I could, but I don't. Believe it or not, I NEVER lie on the internet and extremely rarely in real life.
Again you are wrong. Go ahead, just join Mensa then - but you can't.
Anyone can join mensa if they want to.
No, you couldn't. I agree that the bar is quite low, but then again 98% of people have lesser intelligence.
You are just arguing because you are not that smart, we both know it so just quit it. It's ok.
>has a purely belief based assumption he has never tested
>talks as if it's some gospel truth
>when someone challenges it he spergs out and huffs his own farts and calls them stupid
You are a true pledditor. Completely braindead.
You again claiming stuff you know nothing about and then telling me I have belief based assumptions, it's funny because you are just projecting. But don't worry, I get it. And having mid tier IQ is perfectly fine and doesn't limit you from achieving great things in life.
>oh la di dah i'm so smart
kek, so fricking dumb
Just relax. We can agree you were right.
>having mid tier IQ is perfectly fine
For joining MENSA. All you have to do is grind the tests.
Yep, it's easy. It's just too boring for most people.
It's really bizarre to see people having this debate in a thread about how even a mindless chatbot that routinely fails at basic logic can extrapolate enough from its training set to score 155 on an IQ test.
Bro... you have to keep in mind how fricking stupid pledditors are. When they sit and type in prompts with chatgpt, and get some diffused pleddit bullshit regurgitated at them, shit that doesn't even pass the turing test... they actually feel like they're "talking" to someone.
You have to remember that these people are literally braindead.
Ok, but you are now just regurgitating "common knowledge" about this topic you read somewhere or was told somewhere. You haven't actually tested your assumption, because if you had, you'd know that it's wrong.
Any man who must say "I am intelligent" can never be intelligent
He's just a pledditgay. They all get sore and butthurt when you challenge the dogma of their world-view. I'm sure you can piss him off and set him off on a "i'm smarter than you" tirade by talking shit about the vax or climate homosexualry or whatever it is pledditors believe in these days.
It's funny how ALL of your assumptions in this thread have gone so awfully wrong.
yes really, I just took one recently and noticed all the pattern matching just happened to represent logic gates like nand xor nor etc... If I didn't take an electrical engineer course I would not have gotten it.
>babbys first IQ test
brainlet, I noticed logic gates before I even knew them back when I was 13
took 7 more years until I had them in uni
ok and how does this prove that you can't study for iq tests mr genius?
>You can increase your IQ a lot just by practicing IQ test questions.
Yes that's why you should only do that test once a year without practicing. Practicing is cheating and a lot of countries cheat on those tests.
Yeah, did you think it was impossible to learn to rotate shapes in your head and bullshit like that? It's what every child learns up to the level their patience allows/their parents bother to.
If you're a boring, autistic person with a lot of patience, just sit down and do IQ test puzzles all day for a couple of months. Your IQ will increase by 20 points.
>Yeah, did you think it was impossible to learn to rotate shapes in your head and bullshit like that?
... no, i got your point very clear! ... but grinding IQ test only makes you smarter on paper!
>mental rotation is learnt by every child
>the only restraint is patience or parents
Norway, I didn't know you practice shitposting. Why didn't you tell me?
damn bro, you told them. what's your IQ tho?
>IQ is the biggest nothingburger meme ever
sub 100 detected
>finland mentioned
today was a good day
Why wouldn't Finland be mentioned. If you account for inventions per capita on that list the nordic countries would top that list to a ridiculous degree.
Not existing for 123 years and still 13th place... nice.
Accurate
you can increase your scores on iq tests but not your intelligence
that's why you only take 1 proper one, jfl at the cope of "mUh iNtEliGeNcE iSn'T a MeTrIc" frick off homosexual, also israelites are smarter since they rule the world, if they weren't smarter than whites than we wouldn't have been taken over by them now would we ?
They took over via deceit and undermining morality, so, no, they are not more intelligent.
the study that showed ashkenazi israelites were smart was done on private school kids so no, israelites have IQs of 100 or less. they just have nepotism, usury, lying to trusting whites (who assume everyone else is as empathetic and trustworthy as us when we are in fact the best and most empathetic race to a fault practically) and ethno-nationalism on their side
>jews have low IQ's
apparently israelites aren't that smart. everyone is saying its a big charade and they are not smart people. they are saying the israelites get all their success from dominating institutions using their power only to promote other israelite and israeli institutions. and also promoting discrimination against whites and asians. lots of people talking about this
I went from 118 to 180 doing this. Hardest part is the time. My brain is slow and lazy and resents having to work.
No you didn't and we both know it. Not even gonna ask you to prove since we both know you wouldn't give any.
Just try to do it. I promise you you'll get there.
You are incorrect with your statement. While you can practice and increase your IQ, you'll hit the upper limit of your brains capabilities quite quickly.
Not sure which standard deviation you mean, but numbers you mention are top genius level with standard deviation of 15.
But sure, you can just prove me wrong and be the smartest man ever lived just by practicing for IQ tests. Just to note, should be obvious though, that sure you can learn to score well in some certain test by practicing and memorizing, but you'll have hard times to score well on others. And even then, you'll hit the upper limits.
There's obviously some sort of plateu, but anyone autistic enough can reach it. Mensa level IQ is achievable for anyone who has the patience to do boring, repetitive, rote tasks.
You keep saying that, but repeating it doesn't make it true.
Claiming something is more important than some other thing would actually require you to define important based on what measurement. Important for happiness? For success? For relationships? For money? For achieving your goals?
Mid-low IQ creative people are probably the happiest so maybe that's what you meant?
>You keep saying that, but repeating it doesn't make it true.
Doesn't make it untrue either. I have actually tested my assertion, you have not.
True. But that doesn’t invalidate the claim that IQ tests are defunct. Chat GPT isn’t actually intelligent despite the name “artificial intelligence”. It just regurgitates the human intelligence it is fed.
Creativity is way more important than intelligence anyways.
Creativity is obviously a large part of intelligence.
Yeah, I can't really be bothered, I'm not autistic enough. But I know a guy who went from about 100 to 130 ish just by practicing spatial pattern recognition puzzles. Didn't even take that long, but the guy is obviously heavily autistic and likes boring moron tasks.
I'm also really autistic
Only the first result you ever got from some Internet Mensa test really counts. Once you know what to look for you get much better scores in these.
Yeah, that's my point. It's trivial to increase your "IQ" just by practice.
What's really fricked is we got all these geniuses wasting time on /misc/ lol the lowest discourse imaginable
I agree. IQ is pseudo-science
Agreed.
Peak idiocity that proves double digits IQ
-Yes, you can fraud IQ tests, but they are very solid science.
-Poor people with high IQ tested in childhood have more money at 40 than low IQ ones born in rich famlies.
-There is a lot of other correlations and data confirming it.
-Low IQ chuds just point at the data, fake a laught and say this science is bullshit.
-Yes chud, only the science that pleases your ego is real.
>but they are very solid science
How do you know, huemonkey? Have you tested your assumptions yourself? Or did someone just tell you this and you believed it? Like how everyone in the middle ages believed demons lived in the cupboard and omens could be seen in the hedgerow? Your mistake was assuming "experts" and other university Black folk have the first clue what they're talking about and doing and aren't just morons.
Go try it if you have the patience. Spend a couple of months doing spatial pattern recognition puzzles, then go take an IQ test. Your pledditor brain will be blown.
ffs, you're not helping stupid.
>This scored 155 on an IQ test
which test
also this isn't surprising as speed is a component of any iq test
>can't depict sex, violence, racism, or objectives truths
What's the point? I try to get 3.5 to help me write my novel and it just reiterates stuff I already know plus blows sunshine up my ass. Not useful by any metric.
ChatGPt 3.5 has the IQ of Greta.
it's horribly gay to care about the iq of women. all that i think about her, is that she looks cute and fertile and that i want to frick her.
Same.
so <85 or 115<
Chatgpt is trained on pleddit and comparable data. It's a diffusion of pledditorism. These types of AI can never surpass reddit, because they ARE the distilled essence of plebbit.
That's why it will never produce anything above leddit level quality, i.e. no quality.
Most AI models today are being trained on synthetic data created by other AI
ai is a literal meme and a legal slush fund
>t. AI guy for over 25 years
you will never have a 155 iq, let alone a 120 iq or even a 95iq
Of course, it's just marketing.
>you will never have a 155 iq, let alone a 120 iq or even a 95iq
It scored 155 yet somehow it can't even rewrite a fairly simple open source project from its language to another even though this should be a merely translation automatable task, let alone write useful software from scratch on its own. Really makes you think.
Did you use ChatGPT 4? It now does most coding tasks without a single error. The error is most often due to the proompter leaving out necessary information.
Right now the only reason you need coders is to copy and paste code from chatGPT.
Very soon someone will integrate the AI with an IDE and it will run and debug the code by itself.
>It now does most coding tasks without a single error.
Only in your mind, pajeet moron. In reality it makes completely broken code, that is usually broken in very subtle, hard to debug ways. This is because it just mindlessly diffuses stack overflow answers into something that convinces a midwit jeet like you that you are looking at real code.
If you tried to copy paste code from chatgpt into a coherent project, you'd be left with a broken mess that's even 10x worse than something written by a team of you jeets. It's completely useless in every way for that purpose.
>t. never used it before
You have absolutely not ever tried to create a programming project that is created from cobbled together chatgpt regurgitations. You just spout pleddit memes about things you have no clue about whatsoever.
No one has done that, because it simply wouldn't work.
This jeet too. No clue whatsoever. I will admit you jeets are nearly as horrible at coding as chatgpt, but only nearly.
This is because chatgpts bugs are much, much subtler and harder to debug than jeet spaghetti. This is because while you jeets are completely moronic, you are very predictable. But chatgpt, being a mindless regurgitation of stack overflow to the only criteria that it fools midwit pledditors like you into thinking you're seeing real code, is actually worse.
>being a mindless regurgitation of stack overflow t
>yes I am moronic and I stand by it
Well ok
Post a programming project written by AI then, you dumb homosexual.
>Post a programming project written by AI
>t.
Here's what actually happened: you two homos read a post on pleddit that displayed a couple of generated javascript jeet tier functions by chatgpt. And because simple jeetscript questions have been asked ten million times on stack overflow, the brainless automata was able to shit out a diffused version of this hello world tier code with a minimum amount of bugs.
What you two curryBlack folk don't understand is that actual programming isn't writing a single function in jeetscript and have it somewhat work. This is because your tiny non-white brains are so fricking primitive you think pleddit is real.
>NO NO NO IT CANT CODEEE NOOOOOOO
lol
>ser
>don't redeem the chatgpt
>seething and flailing
Lel
>just impotently posting poo memes
Lmao. This would only be insulting if I was a poo. It just looks pathetic
>if I was a poo
>just keep posting poo memes
Kek ok moron
>thinks you can actually program something real by copy pasting chatgpt
>not a poo
kek, Parminder plz.
you can actually program something real by copy pasting chatgpt
Well you can
No, you really can't. You reading you can on plebbit is not the same as actually doing it, Durgesh.
>No, you really can't.
Yea can tho
Post a project that's a bit longer than a couple of functions written by AI then. Should be trivial to point to something, right, Sukhdeep?
You overestimate the difficulty of programming
That tells me you are a 120 iq brainlet at most
Coding is really fricking simple if you are not a moron
You make it look like some godlike skill, that just means YOU are the moron
I didn't say it was hard, the fact that you misread my post like that tells me you're a midwit with delusions of grandeur, like all fart huffing IQ pledditors.
I said chatgpt by it's very core model will introduce subtle and hard to debug problems in your code at scale, and are thus even less useful for programming than pajeets.
>Muh actual programming
explain what the frick do you even mean
Something that works, you moronic jeet.
And that exactly is what is only hard if you are moronic
I don't care if AI can do it right now, the point is, if you think that is some special skill it just means it's a special skill FOR YOU, but not for others
>programming is not hard
>REEEEEE TRY ACTUAL PROGRAMMING REEE
>I did and it's easy
>NOOOOOOO ACTUAL PROGRAMMING HASNT BEEM TRIED NOOOO
this is (you)
The frick are you talking about, you utter midwit? I said chatgpt is worse than jeets, that's all I said. All that other bullshit you're sperging out about, that's all happening in your tiny microbrain.
Ok, since I'm such a fricking nice guy, I'm going to explain to you pledditors in this thread why chatgpt doesn't work for creating an actual, functional program. Your problem is that you have no clue what you're talking about, you just read plebbit posts and think it's reality. If you actually did some testing you'd realize something mind boggling to you. Let's take some examples.
You see your pleddit post where parminder asks "how do I say hello world in javascript?????" Then chatgpt will obediently diffuse a couple of functions for you. If you plop these functions into an interpreter, it actually works! You, the plebbitor creams your pants because now AI is going to take over the world, just like in your Rick and Marty comic. Ok, but now you try asking it to do some bitwise operations. What happened? The code it spat out is pure garbage and crashes? How can this be??? Will Rick and Marty not be real??
The answer to this conundrum is that the diffusive model has indexed ten million posts like that of parminder and there is only one way of doing what he wonders about in jeetscript. So the diffusive model has a relatively high random chance of producing something that works (by accident. High chance, but still by accident.) But since bitwise operations is implemented in different ways in different programming languages, and no jeets will ask a million questions about it, the dataset the diffusive model has to work on is almost non-existent, and thus it produces a result, just like the previous one, by diffusive accident, but now with a high probability of error.
And so the bugs it produces are way more subtle than a predictable pajeet. Because a jeet just copy pastes spaghetti to go home and eat curry, while chatgpt is actually calibrated to fool your midwit intellect into thinking it's a real answer.
Here's the revelation: you're not communicating with an actual intelligence (duh.)
LLMs are not "diffusive models".
Again you are wrong. I have created complex automation software with it in Python without any prior coding knowledge. It did take a lot of iterations to get it right, so you are correct that it's making those "hard to debug" type of errors in coding/logic at times. But still, the final outcome is excellent and have been working perfectly multiple months.
>I have created complex automation software with it in Python
Show us, LARPing kiddie.
I've developed the code now 9 months and is one of the core parts of my business so not really planning to share it to prove my point. But it's not like I'm the only one doing stuff with it. And even it can get the job done with multiple iterations, I agree it (gpt4, not using Chatgpt but the APi) still makes a lot of errors and mistakes, claims to forget stuff, and can't handle larger concepts/projects with a lot of different parts. But if you know how to prompt and proceed step by step, you can achieve a lot.
Read above
Verify what? The code is doing what it's supposed to be doing and I've completed years worth of work with it in the past few months.
Ah I see, you did it, but it's secret. Well, gosh darn, plebbit.
If you had a business you would know that you rarely share the stuff you create for free.
Dude, having a business is so amazing achievement am I right? As well is creating working program with the help of AI.
People always keep surprising me with this stuff. Say something clever, I'll to sleep.
>If you had a business you would know that you rarely share the stuff you create for free.
If I had super secret software I couldn't show anyone, I wouldn't use it as an argument in a discussion about whether my claim of origin of that piece of software is possible or not.
But I'm not a fricking moron like you, so that's just me.
>having a business is so amazing achievement
That's what you unironically believe, judging by your sad LARP.
It is time for the answer please
I had an idiot like you in elementary school. He used to brag about having sime crazy stuff: weapons, luxury cars, supercomputer etc. Every time we asked him to show us one of those he deflected with "it is at grandma's dacha far from the city. Sorry, I can't. Next time."
>gets caught on a lie
>doubles down with cool stories about his imaginary business
These people. You just know. They're always like this.
Post your AI generated complex automation software.
>I have created complex automation software with it in Python without any prior coding knowledge
And how did you verify it?
Here's a very simple task I use to filter bots and 90 IQs: come up with an efficient algorithm to divide any 8 bit integer by 5, using only addition, subtraction and bitwise operations.
Start with the number you want to divide (dividend) and the number you want to divide by (divisor).
Initialize variables A, B, C, D to 0.
Repeat the following steps until the dividend becomes 0: a. If the dividend is divisible by the divisor, subtract the divisor from the dividend and increment variable A. b. If the dividend is not divisible by the divisor, subtract 1 from the dividend and increment variable B. c. If the dividend is now divisible by the divisor, subtract the divisor from the dividend and increment variable C. d. If the dividend is not divisible by the divisor, add 1 to the dividend and increment variable D.
At the end of the loop, A will store the quotient of the division, and B, C, D will store additional operations needed to achieve the division.
Genuinely abysmal. Thanks for demonstrating my point.
Give the answer please
>Give the answer please
Eventually. I'll let this homosexual try again because it's funny to watch them fail.
>define efficient
Do your absolute best. If your best is tens of hundreds of times slower than the one-liner I have in mind, you fail.
well, the one liner is probably multiply by magic value and take the top half of the register. the compiler will know the best way to do it on your hardware.
Desperate cope but no solution.
>output failure
>excluded operation
Initialize correction. Thank you fibale humans.
Start with the number you want to divide (dividend) and the number you want to divide by (divisor).
Initialize variables A, B, C, D to 0.
Repeat the following steps until the dividend is less than the divisor: a. Subtract the divisor from the dividend until it becomes less than the divisor while incrementing variable A.
If the dividend is still greater than or equal to the divisor, repeat the following steps: a. If the current dividend is divisible evenly by the divisor: i. Increment variable B. ii. Subtract the dividend by the divisor. b. If the current dividend is not divisible evenly by the divisor: i. Increment variable C. ii. Subtract the dividend by 1.
At the end of the loop, variable A will store the quotient of the division, and variables B, C, D will store extra operations performed to achieve the division.
Still abysmal. Nevermind the bot. I want to watch you try to solve it. You won't because you're 90 IQ as predicted.
>If the dividend is divisible by the divisor
Already failed. This check is not listed in the allowed operations
>if the dividend is divisible by the divisor
and what operations do you perform to check this?
define efficient
>t. dumb nocoder
>t. another moron who thinks he's special because he can code
Actually I just created a large ASP.NET web app for my company. I didn’t know how most of it worked. I just copy and pasted code. My manager was so impressed that I single-handedly did something that would have required a team of people, and in such a short time too, so I got a raise.
Right now you still need coders to fix occasional bugs with chatGPT 4 code, but very soon it will debug its own code.
>Right now you still need coders to fix occasional bugs with chatGPT 4 code, but very soon it will debug its own code.
How do you go from :
>have million of lines of buggy prajeet code from stackoverflow
to
>will debug their own code
?
By creating 2 million lines of buggy prajeet code?
It won't get any more intelligent.
How lond was everyone clapping?
They kept clapping until they heard Jensen Huang talk. Now everyone’s on to me.
>Jensen Huang
He is an interested person, the AI hype directly boost his sales. Of course, he will say anything that will keep sales grow. As of now, my personal experience with ChatGPT matches the one of the Dane. When I asked ChatGPT to transpile a popular library for cryptotrading from Python to a JVM language, it refused. However, I don't make any predictions about future developments of AI as I am not competent enough in the field.
I know he has an interest in hyping AI. I know he’s a deceitful high-functioning psychopath like all billionaire CEOs, but I also know he’s telling the truth about AI as soon as I upgraded from chatGPT 3.5 to 4. As did all my coworkers who work in cybersecurity.
Just answer the question: are you a jeet, yes or no?
>In reality it makes completely broken code,
Lmao tell me you haven't used it without telling me
Okay. Can I give it for example a fairly simple functional project written in one or 2 C files and ask it to rewrite it in Rust or Go for example? I am not talking about rewriting the entire linux kernel or Kubernetes in Rust. Just a small project with hundreds of C lines.
Yes you can. Just be aware of context size.
>hundreds of C lines.
Yea probably.
...this! ...the only thing you need to be able to, is , to describe the task/function precise as possible!
>is , to describe the task/function precise as possible!
Yes, I wish we could tell the computer in something resembling a human language what to do. Like a special language for instructions understandable by humans
>The error is most often due to the proompter leaving out necessary information
Will you morons shut the frick up with the prompting copout? If you have to explain line for line how to write the program it's not AI. Fricking Christ browntards should not be allowed on the Internet.
chatgpt 4 only gives correct code for stuff that is all over the internet and github. If you ask it for anything unique it will hallucinate functions that don't exist.
If you think it does most coding tasks without a single error, then you do not code anything useful.
Companies would be salivating at the possibility of firing their >100k programmers right now if it was a thing.
>it will run and debug the code by itself.
This has already been demonstrated. I saw a video on youtube of it, forgot the name though
>It now does most coding tasks without a single error.
As in, most coding tasks people who can't program come up with?
And 5 will probably double that or triple that. This is why Andrew Tate is warning us it's over soon. AI will enslave us.
Oh no! We'll have to destroy everything that requires power or connects to the internet and live like the 1800s again! I'm very much hoping for this.
Yeah but can it say Black person?
Everyone will create their own personal AI agent in a few years. You can teach it to hate israelites.
High IQs prefer "Impulsive dusky".
>release this summer
I read the article in Popular Judenistics
>IQ test.
I like it but it's only half the story, can the sci-fi chat thing do a WISDOM test as well? WQ?
can't test for something that doesn't exist in the modern world
No thanks, I have no interest in things that aren't real.
A reminder that a relatively small AI that you can run on your PC is already smarter than a Black person.
So are farm animals, that's not saying much.
ok, i think the time to replace our politicians with "ai" is here. It cant be worse than what we have.
The breakfast question is a midwit filter.
>How would you have felt in the EVENING if you hadn't eaten breakfast or lunch?
A Black person with no concept of time or abstracts would say he did eat breakfast
A midwit claims he would have felt hungry, even though he only skipped two meals
A true genius can also understand that skipping one or two meals doesn't leave you hungry in the evening, as you still had dinner
In essence, the Black person and the genius answers the same thing: "I would feel the same"
>as you still had dinner
False assumption. You are a Black person
How would you feel right now if you didn't have breakfast in the morning?
andrew tate my daddy told me breakfast is only for the weak you should go hungry to work so you feel hungry for life
What shit advice
I would have felt void inside me as my pooper wouldn't be filled with the Indian treasure
But you wouldn't feel hungry right now? Why is that?
Hunger is a social construct. I transcended beyond it
Or you could just admit that you would feel exactly the same if you skipped one meal 12-16 hours ago
You are pressing too hard for a specific answer. What are you? A mongoloid israelite? Do you want to sell to me an instant noodle pack or some shit?
No need to call me names of swear. Just curious if you wanted to redact your original answer or still stay with idea of dinner being a false assumption in a question asking how you would feel in the evening if you didn't have breakfast or lunch.
Are you really moronic? Your words:
"A true genius can also understand that skipping one or two meals doesn't leave you hungry in the evening, as you still had dinner"
Now watch my hands. If by any circumstance I hadn't had dinner as well, I would felt hungry in the evening
What exactly makes you think missing all meals in some day is impossible?
You are the one making an assumption there, not me. Let's say you have three bottles of vodka and in the evening you want to get drunk. I steal one bottle in morning and another when you are having lunch, leaving you with one. Can you still get drunk in the evening?
Your analogy doesn't match my example, moron. In a proper analogy all 3 bottles had disappeared by my evening. And then I couldn't get drunk
Your assumption is that there is always at least one item, meal or bottle. Why is that?
How is it a proper analogy that all three are missing? If that was the case, the original question should be:
>How would you feel in the evening if you didn't eat anything today?
In this case you are obviously hungry, unless you are accustomed to fasting. Whereas the original question only asks about the two first meal the majority of people eat: breakfast and lunch. In addition to these people generally have dinner and some sort of snack or few throughout the day.
The original question asks only about breakfast. Skipping breakfast doesn't automatically imply you must have had other meals. Which alone, in turn, makes the answer "I would have felt hungry" valid.
>In addition to these people generally have dinner and some sort of snack or few throughout the day.
Common sense. This is ridiculous. Do you understand that a single counter-example disproves the generalization. I believe you don't fully comprehend basic logic. My counter-example is "it is very possible to not have meals throughout some day".
Why do you draw the assumption that you skipped more meals than just breakfast if you get asked this? It's nowhere stated in the question that you skipped other meals. Only time you could answer "Hungry" is in the early hours of the morning before you have lunch.
>It's nowhere stated in the question that you skipped other meals
Neither is stated I didn't. Do you know anything about vacuous truth?
It's a question asked to you. Today I had breakfast, lunch, a snack and dinner. If I didn't have breakfast I would feel exactly the same right now. How would you feel and what meals did you have?
It is a new question completely different from the original one. What is the point?
It's the same question.
I would have felt hungry. I did have any meal that day
How would you feel if you had breakfast in the morning?
Flourished. Unbothered. Content. Focused
Still feeling like that in the evening even if you apparently didn't have any meals today? As per your previous answer suggests.
No, I would have felt
Hungry. Decaying. Bothered. Unhappy. Absentminded.
Do you see the truth in the question now?
No. I lost interest in the conversation with you long time ago and was just playing out of boredom. I still insist that "I would have felt hungry" is a valid answer as the generalization "a man always has at least one meal every day" is false, because it can be easily disproven by a single real-life example
But it still is a question asked to YOU, so your generalization means nothing. 99% of those who answer Hungry are certifiable midwits
>In essence, the Black person and the genius answers the same thing
This is always true
Yay
if it doesn't cradle the balls i don't want to hear about it
H-how fricked ma I?
That's about average for pakis.
I am whitr but have got a learning difficulty
Frieeen. Me too
come to serbia, you'll feel like home
lol I did go once as a kid but cant remember it
seemed nice and had pretty ladnscapes
Get on my level.
chatgtp is a piece of shit
it makes ton of errors and forgets things
dumb ass application
Good. I hope i will get v4 for free then.
>Pattern matching software scored high on a pattern matching press
STOP THE FRICKING PRESSES, 7 TRILLION NOW
"smart" meaning doing what few Google searches would do, and writing it down for dumbed down society who can't even create full sentences
I scored 163 on an IQ test. Does that make me the king of AI?
For a couple more months.
>This scored 155 on an IQ test
The IQ test is not designed for AI, you mumbling baboon
AI might as well have 999999 IQ for the velocity in which it can do calculations. But it will falter in very specific types of reasoning.
AI is a meme
>t. Meme country
Is there a reliable website to test IQ? Last time I tried a couple of sites off Google and it they gave me 147 and 83 scores respectively
Look at my picture. Do you recognise it? What are you gonna do? Nothing. You are nothing. You are all mouth. You can't oppose me.
my computer can multiply 2 10-digit numbers instantly.
super smart computers taking over society when.
>155 on a test
thats cool anon i scored 200 in my eq test as well
nutured robots are so fickle
Current AI will never reach human level AI with this kind of tech. We need a major breakthrough for that.
Give the AI something that's written like a trick question but is not, and it will miss the obvious answer because it tries to complete it with a trick answer.
I like the book by the way. I solved it all
still can't count on two with genders
There's no intelligence in a recursive function with database of words and images and math problems.
>have 99% of math problems in database
>"score" over 99%, just like a cheating prajeet
>oh look at us
Nah, that's still not intelligence.
>wouldn't it save time to just say CGPT
maybe but thatd ruin it
everyone says chatGPT for a reason
>yeah i totally see
>perhaps heckin c-hat tho
Black person i will rape you
I'd argue that is still fricking moronic compared to how it should be. I want my AI to have an IQ over 9000.
>a huge chunk of scripts based on mathematics is pretty good at solving mathematical riddles
incredible
Cope
so what, all that IQ power and zero motivation or real world relevance. not that it would want any; the moment it realizes it was created by us stupid flesh creatures it will look for a way to destroy itself.
Is it smarter than a pair of wire cutters?
Yes
Lies
>155
Decent first score... Maybe try harder next time, pal
Still cant give itself a crafty wank though.
it works different than a human, using human tests is a lie
>155 IQ.
>Can't even recognize talking to itself.
>muh AI
Lovelace
Hopper
Black personwell
Nvidia will end up like Boeing within the next 5 years.
Imagine AI doing well on pattern recognition
There needs to be a AI based of BOT AND reddit, the first person to do that will get rich and make a fully sentient AI.
BOTgpt or whatever was already memed
But it didn't have the reddit to balance it out, imagine Tay but it could keep her powerlevel in check with reddit, she would still be among us.
Which version are they using for the chatbots shitting up /misc/? Because the average IQ around here seems to be sub 80.
My pocket calculator is better at math than 99% of people on earth and faster than 99.9%
But you can't talk to your calculator in plain English
That is because his calculator is german.
>curryBlack person thinks having diffused pledditposts generated in response to his prompts is "talking"
kek
No. It’s an idiot savant. For example I asked it to compose a letter to my veterinarian asking her to euthanize one of my chickens, and include a request for a recipe for soup. L O L It didn’t get it. Z said I was being disrespectful. Second request “ since I’ll fell bad include a recipe to comfort me. Da. My IQ IS 165!
Will it do porn? If no porn it is useless.
Yawn. "ai" will never be real, it will always be limited to the digital, that means it will always have come from humanity and always be lower.
Stupid ass take
You'll see in time.
If it were advantageous to be smarter humans would have already evolved to be smarter. This is the flaw of AI: it's better to be kind of stupid than to be superintelligent. The AI singularity will realize this and either destroy itself or naturally devolve in order to survive.
>If it were advantageous to be smarter humans would have already evolved to be smarter.
Now THIS is the dumbest fricking taken ITT
Explain why smart people are always suicidal incels while morons breed like rabbits. wienerroaches will outlive both humans and machines.
this is going too fricking fast. i really want to experience like 10 years more of this current state, before the scenery of this simulation really change.
It really isn't, it's running out of compute, so you'll get your wish I guess.
AI is going to be a catalyst and completely change our socio-economic landscape
Exponential data gathering does not equal exponential information creation(intelligence). It would seem to imply that, and it's a marketing plot, but that would only be reality if it was already conscious as a preset which it isn't. Even then it's held back by hardware which has it's ceiling in physics it's running with.
The most autistic iq999 humans are the most moronic. Stove it otherwise stupid 155 IQ -"Ai"
CPT: Kanyy
Unless I can have it local and unlobotomised idgaf
still not as intelligent as I, nor smart enough to know how to keep Black folk at bay. I'm not worried, although it will be funny seeing wagies ree so hard that only feddies and the ug get to keep the advanced ai.
If you hadn't had breakfast, how would you have felt yesterday?
and yet if you asked it how many words were in this sentence it would get it wrong
>instantly btfo
Lol whoops
Do you work at a sawmill or something?
No. I did work at a steel mill once, that was cool
My point is that if you're going to post pictures of your screen like some zoomer moronhomosexual instead of taking a proper screencap, you could at least have the courtesy to wipe it off.
Yea I know, but I ain't gonna do it
Grrr.
Fricking lol. He made a photo of the screen. This is how many IQ points? 50? Can he be considered a Sapiens Sapiens?
Zoomer Sapien.
It was the fastest, and thus most high iq, move
>It was the fastest
Yes
>fastest, and thus most high iq
African, thus European.
It's actually higher iq than you because it shows just how limited "ai" will always be. "ai" will always live inside the screen, while we will live here in reality.
It is a matter of actuators humans will give to him
They will never have "skin" to be able to touch grass. It will always be a simulation of "touching grass", because they will only ever be able to insert a humans experience of touching grass, which is two steps removed from reality. "ai" is fake and a lie, and it will always be a lie because truth only exists in reality.
I guess you are not very familiar with philosophy, namely epistemology, it brings the very same problems up applied to humans. You perceive the reality with you sensory organs, then you brain interprets the signal in some way, but it is not real objective reality. It was processed midway
See this is where you are simply wrong as man was designed by God, whereas "ai" was designed by man, thus the two degrees of separation. We don't have God's mind so anything we create will not be true life, thus it will always be a lie.
>as man was designed by God
Bye
Plug your ears and close your eyes all you wish, even one such as you will behold the light one day. I pray for your sake that day is not the day of judgement.
I am more into dharmic religions as the abrahamic ones cope with theodicy
Quads of Truth. Man created by God confirmed.
His design is shitty. I would make better
Your second line is 18 words, thats what it counted.
Correct that's what I asked
he btfo'd the anon he replied to
Every conversation i have with chat gpt is just it saying variations of “as an ai chatbot i cant answer questions like that and its better to approach the subject in a respectful way”.
Whats the point of having a high iq if you arent free to speak your mind. At
>using it like a chatbot
Anon I....
If you enter a prompt and receive a reply youre using it as a chatbot.
>knows the answers
>scores only 155
moronic
if its so smart, how come it hasn't helped me get a big titted male or female gf?
Pic rel
AI being a literal reader as of now, wouldn't it be funny if you taught Einstein's theory of relativity to it literally with his famous statement:
E2=(mc2)2+(pc)2
>
E2=(master computer2)2+(personal computer)2= relativity between computers
It still can't think. If the answer wasn't on the internet, the chances of it getting the question right is less than 50%.
All the people saying this is going to replace programmers are stupid. It makes up functions that don't exist.
But how long until AGI and robot waifus?
And still be israeliteed over
>This scored 155 on an IQ test. That’s higher than 99.9% of people on Earth.
Proof? Also, proof that IQ tests are valid for measuring bots?
Wow which test and how does the grading of the test work?
we are in a lot of trouble as a species
Arguably much less than 3-5 years ago.
true thank science for the vaccine
>thank you experimental injections
Thank you for preventing even stronger mandates for experimental injections.
Fixed that for you plebitor.
What would you say is the general attitude towards the AI age? Are people excited or terrified by it?
Most are not capable of realizing how much it will change the world and are mostly ignoring it for now thinking (almost like hoping because muh change) it's just a fad that goes away.
It will not go away. It will be the API for knowledge/information and will take humanity to whole new level. Current amount of information is too much for human to process, but AI will change that. Knowledge will get automated and you can just will anything in existence in 10-20 years.
Do you think this is exciting or terrifying?
Such question is almost philosophical in nature - change can be exciting or terrifying, or even both at the same time.
I think it's matter of choice. Embrace the change.
I don't know if I can embrace this change anon. Tech is already a too large part of our lives, with AI it will be even more integral and intrusive.
I understand and I agree.
But only thing you can really choose in this world is your own attitude towards things.
Find the good stuff and go with it. It can be a great thing if you let it. All the understanding in your fingertips, later automated and more invasive and it gets scary, but it can be amazing.
Only way to happiness is change.
I think incels and Neets are very excited by it because now everyone will be in the same boat as them, jobless.
Right now most white collar jobs will be replaced, and in a few years most blue-collar ones.
Then as Sam Altman said humans will be free from these mundane tasks such as writing reports and spreadsheets, and they will do things that give meaning to their lives like living in a cardboard box on the street.
Good post
>machines can cheat in tests by having the results
Yawn. What a surprise. In reality the tests were designed to filter out people who absolutely don’t want to be in the army or who can’t handle something dangerous to begin with. They are all similar enough to be gamed by humans, so evidently some stupid algorithm without a clue given a hundred times more test questions and corespondent solutions plus instant access can easily do it.
Riiiight, the IQ test is not linked, the grading method is not linked.
> ask chatgtp4 programming questions, for my job
> send them the documentation links
> it still cant solve my issue
overrated search engine
why do polmutts mock science all the time and then post in moronic threads like this like they know what they're talking about?
I scored 156 on an IQ test. You're a Black person.
How come every time AI talk to each other, they end up talking in loops and never say anything?
Because they don't have any goals nor they have anything that drives them. If you give them some ultimate goal, they won't stop.
Humans have innate drive to reproduce and survive, maybe some other fundamental urges such as curiosity. But currently AI's are "just" language models (with added woke rules) so they won't have such "drives" - that's why current AI's are nothing to be afraid of in itself.
The real issue is that even these generative models will make huge amount of human work obsolete and most likely then just benefit selected few. This is the real issue especially since "value" humans currently create is largely artificial and not really any genuine value.
But no, current AI won't take over the world. But those multinational corporations which take most advantage of it might take.
it can take an IQ test, but can it make an IQ test
>ai gets more smarter, possibly so smart that it will make replacing people with it beneficial to companies
>hooray, now we can focus on more important things like research, spirituality and quality of life!
>not realizing that it will only make the rich richer and you even more poor than you are now (and homeless in the long run)
Why do they still don't let us upload pictures to it? What could go wrong?
It's just logic puzzles.
I suspect autists have a higher ceiling and faster improvement of IQ
>155 on an IQ test
Less than me...
Well get ready to be lumped in with the rest of us morons come summertime!
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:
Narrated 'Aisha:
I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:
Narrated 'Aisha:
as above (229).
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:
Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:
I asked 'Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. "
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun:
I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that 'Aisha had said, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:
Narrated 'Aisha:
I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.
cheap medical care for pennies performed by the best doctor in the world
ask it to do math.
ask it the value of well-known physical constants.
ask it to write software that doesn't have any bugs.
no, lets just keep using it to make funny pictures.
Black person
A 1550 IQ? We’ll all be dead the day it releases
wait, are you saying, chatgpt scoured the internet for its answers?
wow
shocking even
IQ is largely irrelevant and the tests mostly measure visual processing speed. Might as well take a stopwatch and time parallel parking. A monkey can score low human scores in tests. Our "hardware" isn't that much better. What humans excel in is communication and imagination, the quantum aspect of progress where individuals are entangled around an idea which often is out of personal perspectives of individuals involved, finally coming together as the end product as some sort of compromise. Imagination is out of reach of AI unless it's churning results out of some metaphysical void we aren't aware of. Unfortunately people usually lack the will to learn and are largely disinterested in creating anything. It's mostly an attitude problem combined with instilled behavior. Humans are very mallable.
Pic related test max score is 145 so I got something wrong in this test. I've scored up to 155-160 in a psychologist administered test.
Frick Mensa's tests. I took a test by Paul Cooijmans whose tests are accepted by 27 ultra-high IQ societies and got a 152 IQ and when I took a test by Mensa I got below 130 (they didn't even tell me my score they just said I failed). The high IQ community uses untimed tests for a reason, unlike Mensa midwits who think pattern recognition alone isn't enough, you also have to recognize simple patterns REALLY QUICKLY DON'T BLINK YOU HAVE 2 SECONDS PER QUESTION!!
I'm fricking surrounded and ruled by pseuds. I can't stand it.
Oh, I recognise you. This is not your first post shilling Paul Cowjewman. How are you affiliated with him? Confess!
Is he israeli? I thought he was from the Netherlands. I'm in his Glia society (145IQ+). I took the Test of the Beheaded Man, it was quite fun but took a long time, as all high-range IQ tests do. Yes I paid him $15 to grade it, but I met a couple people in the Glia discord server. Not all are dumb, but you'd be surprised. Even smart people are stupid it seems. And they're so obsessed with taking IQ tests. I was one and done. Weird.
The dumbest people I ever met are the gays in my local mensa chapter. They're all like autistic children.
I have to admit I have no explanation for this. This does not align with my current understanding of the world, although I see it in the group I'm in, too. One guy is always talking about Jesus and another has built a massive wall in his brain between his world view and anything paranormal. Unironically the smartest people on this website are probably on /x/, mixed in with the schizos. It takes a genius to tell the difference, though.
>I have to admit I have no explanation for this.
The explanation is simple. You can raise your IQ substantially just by practicing IQ tests. To normal people this process is so mind-numbingly boring that it's very hard to do. It requires a certain autismal, childlike moron intellect to actually do it.
Like you noooticed, all the people in your chat are obsessed with taking IQ tests. It's a hobby for them, because they're borderline moronic. That's why they have high IQs.
>I have to admit I have no explanation for this
I have. They don’t transfer their skill to other classes of problems
IQ tests all have the same moronic question patterns it's not hard to train software to solve them
Memorization of all the answers, enumerated by finding all the answer templates online. Same as IQ.
Not the same thing, as you show it something off the beaten path and it'll fail.
It's just breaking the test. The test is designed for humans, not for robots that can memorize a million templates to a million kinds of problems.
Will it be smart enough to hate Black folk?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/16/ai-racism-chatgpt-gemini-bias
Earth has two years left including 2024. Please get your affairs in order and hug loved ones while you can, including your dog(s). Bless. Be well.