This scored 155 on an IQ test. Thats higher than 99.9% of people on Earth. ChatGPT 5 will be release this summer.

This scored 155 on an IQ test. That’s higher than 99.9% of people on Earth.
ChatGPT 5 will be release this summer. It will be 10x smarter than ChatGPT 4.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That’s the big question.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can increase your IQ a lot just by practicing IQ test questions. IQ is the biggest nothingburger meme ever. Imagine thinking israelites and insectoid chinkchonks are the same as white people just because they have comparable IQs hahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahaha.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      not really

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You absolutely can. Thinking humans can't learn pattern recognition just shows that you're a moron. It's a trait that is relatively easy to learn, it's just too boring for most people to sit down and practice pattern recognition puzzles. You have to be pretty autistic like a chingchong to find it interesting.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You'll hit your upper limit very fast.

          Don't believe me? Go ahead and go measure top10 IQ of all time. You can't.

          It's usually cope for either very low IQ or maybe even more often for those who are slightly smarter than average, but could never get to the top 2% club.

          T. >135

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >T. >135
            Of course, you are. You can't just lie on the Internet, why would you do that?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I could, but I don't. Believe it or not, I NEVER lie on the internet and extremely rarely in real life.

              Ok, but you are now just regurgitating "common knowledge" about this topic you read somewhere or was told somewhere. You haven't actually tested your assumption, because if you had, you'd know that it's wrong.

              Again you are wrong. Go ahead, just join Mensa then - but you can't.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anyone can join mensa if they want to.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, you couldn't. I agree that the bar is quite low, but then again 98% of people have lesser intelligence.

                You are just arguing because you are not that smart, we both know it so just quit it. It's ok.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >has a purely belief based assumption he has never tested
                >talks as if it's some gospel truth
                >when someone challenges it he spergs out and huffs his own farts and calls them stupid
                You are a true pledditor. Completely braindead.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You again claiming stuff you know nothing about and then telling me I have belief based assumptions, it's funny because you are just projecting. But don't worry, I get it. And having mid tier IQ is perfectly fine and doesn't limit you from achieving great things in life.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >oh la di dah i'm so smart
                kek, so fricking dumb

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Just relax. We can agree you were right.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >having mid tier IQ is perfectly fine
                For joining MENSA. All you have to do is grind the tests.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yep, it's easy. It's just too boring for most people.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's really bizarre to see people having this debate in a thread about how even a mindless chatbot that routinely fails at basic logic can extrapolate enough from its training set to score 155 on an IQ test.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Bro... you have to keep in mind how fricking stupid pledditors are. When they sit and type in prompts with chatgpt, and get some diffused pleddit bullshit regurgitated at them, shit that doesn't even pass the turing test... they actually feel like they're "talking" to someone.

                You have to remember that these people are literally braindead.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ok, but you are now just regurgitating "common knowledge" about this topic you read somewhere or was told somewhere. You haven't actually tested your assumption, because if you had, you'd know that it's wrong.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >oh la di dah i'm so smart
            kek, so fricking dumb

            Any man who must say "I am intelligent" can never be intelligent

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              He's just a pledditgay. They all get sore and butthurt when you challenge the dogma of their world-view. I'm sure you can piss him off and set him off on a "i'm smarter than you" tirade by talking shit about the vax or climate homosexualry or whatever it is pledditors believe in these days.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's funny how ALL of your assumptions in this thread have gone so awfully wrong.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yes really, I just took one recently and noticed all the pattern matching just happened to represent logic gates like nand xor nor etc... If I didn't take an electrical engineer course I would not have gotten it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >babbys first IQ test
          brainlet, I noticed logic gates before I even knew them back when I was 13
          took 7 more years until I had them in uni

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ok and how does this prove that you can't study for iq tests mr genius?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You can increase your IQ a lot just by practicing IQ test questions.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes that's why you should only do that test once a year without practicing. Practicing is cheating and a lot of countries cheat on those tests.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, did you think it was impossible to learn to rotate shapes in your head and bullshit like that? It's what every child learns up to the level their patience allows/their parents bother to.

        If you're a boring, autistic person with a lot of patience, just sit down and do IQ test puzzles all day for a couple of months. Your IQ will increase by 20 points.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Yeah, did you think it was impossible to learn to rotate shapes in your head and bullshit like that?

          ... no, i got your point very clear! ... but grinding IQ test only makes you smarter on paper!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >mental rotation is learnt by every child
          >the only restraint is patience or parents
          Norway, I didn't know you practice shitposting. Why didn't you tell me?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn bro, you told them. what's your IQ tho?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >IQ is the biggest nothingburger meme ever
      sub 100 detected

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >finland mentioned
        today was a good day

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why wouldn't Finland be mentioned. If you account for inventions per capita on that list the nordic countries would top that list to a ridiculous degree.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not existing for 123 years and still 13th place... nice.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Accurate

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you can increase your scores on iq tests but not your intelligence

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's why you only take 1 proper one, jfl at the cope of "mUh iNtEliGeNcE iSn'T a MeTrIc" frick off homosexual, also israelites are smarter since they rule the world, if they weren't smarter than whites than we wouldn't have been taken over by them now would we ?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They took over via deceit and undermining morality, so, no, they are not more intelligent.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the study that showed ashkenazi israelites were smart was done on private school kids so no, israelites have IQs of 100 or less. they just have nepotism, usury, lying to trusting whites (who assume everyone else is as empathetic and trustworthy as us when we are in fact the best and most empathetic race to a fault practically) and ethno-nationalism on their side

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >jews have low IQ's

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        apparently israelites aren't that smart. everyone is saying its a big charade and they are not smart people. they are saying the israelites get all their success from dominating institutions using their power only to promote other israelite and israeli institutions. and also promoting discrimination against whites and asians. lots of people talking about this

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I went from 118 to 180 doing this. Hardest part is the time. My brain is slow and lazy and resents having to work.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No you didn't and we both know it. Not even gonna ask you to prove since we both know you wouldn't give any.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Just try to do it. I promise you you'll get there.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are incorrect with your statement. While you can practice and increase your IQ, you'll hit the upper limit of your brains capabilities quite quickly.

            Not sure which standard deviation you mean, but numbers you mention are top genius level with standard deviation of 15.

            But sure, you can just prove me wrong and be the smartest man ever lived just by practicing for IQ tests. Just to note, should be obvious though, that sure you can learn to score well in some certain test by practicing and memorizing, but you'll have hard times to score well on others. And even then, you'll hit the upper limits.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              There's obviously some sort of plateu, but anyone autistic enough can reach it. Mensa level IQ is achievable for anyone who has the patience to do boring, repetitive, rote tasks.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You keep saying that, but repeating it doesn't make it true.

                [...]
                [...]
                Creativity is way more important than intelligence anyways.

                Claiming something is more important than some other thing would actually require you to define important based on what measurement. Important for happiness? For success? For relationships? For money? For achieving your goals?

                Mid-low IQ creative people are probably the happiest so maybe that's what you meant?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You keep saying that, but repeating it doesn't make it true.
                Doesn't make it untrue either. I have actually tested my assertion, you have not.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              True. But that doesn’t invalidate the claim that IQ tests are defunct. Chat GPT isn’t actually intelligent despite the name “artificial intelligence”. It just regurgitates the human intelligence it is fed.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              There's obviously some sort of plateu, but anyone autistic enough can reach it. Mensa level IQ is achievable for anyone who has the patience to do boring, repetitive, rote tasks.

              True. But that doesn’t invalidate the claim that IQ tests are defunct. Chat GPT isn’t actually intelligent despite the name “artificial intelligence”. It just regurgitates the human intelligence it is fed.

              Creativity is way more important than intelligence anyways.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Creativity is obviously a large part of intelligence.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, I can't really be bothered, I'm not autistic enough. But I know a guy who went from about 100 to 130 ish just by practicing spatial pattern recognition puzzles. Didn't even take that long, but the guy is obviously heavily autistic and likes boring moron tasks.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm also really autistic

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Only the first result you ever got from some Internet Mensa test really counts. Once you know what to look for you get much better scores in these.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, that's my point. It's trivial to increase your "IQ" just by practice.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >babbys first IQ test
            brainlet, I noticed logic gates before I even knew them back when I was 13
            took 7 more years until I had them in uni

            What's really fricked is we got all these geniuses wasting time on /misc/ lol the lowest discourse imaginable

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I agree. IQ is pseudo-science

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Agreed.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Peak idiocity that proves double digits IQ

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      -Yes, you can fraud IQ tests, but they are very solid science.
      -Poor people with high IQ tested in childhood have more money at 40 than low IQ ones born in rich famlies.
      -There is a lot of other correlations and data confirming it.
      -Low IQ chuds just point at the data, fake a laught and say this science is bullshit.
      -Yes chud, only the science that pleases your ego is real.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >but they are very solid science
        How do you know, huemonkey? Have you tested your assumptions yourself? Or did someone just tell you this and you believed it? Like how everyone in the middle ages believed demons lived in the cupboard and omens could be seen in the hedgerow? Your mistake was assuming "experts" and other university Black folk have the first clue what they're talking about and doing and aren't just morons.

        Go try it if you have the patience. Spend a couple of months doing spatial pattern recognition puzzles, then go take an IQ test. Your pledditor brain will be blown.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ffs, you're not helping stupid.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This scored 155 on an IQ test
    which test
    also this isn't surprising as speed is a component of any iq test

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >can't depict sex, violence, racism, or objectives truths
    What's the point? I try to get 3.5 to help me write my novel and it just reiterates stuff I already know plus blows sunshine up my ass. Not useful by any metric.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ChatGPt 3.5 has the IQ of Greta.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's horribly gay to care about the iq of women. all that i think about her, is that she looks cute and fertile and that i want to frick her.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Same.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        so <85 or 115<

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chatgpt is trained on pleddit and comparable data. It's a diffusion of pledditorism. These types of AI can never surpass reddit, because they ARE the distilled essence of plebbit.

      That's why it will never produce anything above leddit level quality, i.e. no quality.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Most AI models today are being trained on synthetic data created by other AI

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chatgpt is trained on pleddit and comparable data. It's a diffusion of pledditorism. These types of AI can never surpass reddit, because they ARE the distilled essence of plebbit.

      That's why it will never produce anything above leddit level quality, i.e. no quality.

      Most AI models today are being trained on synthetic data created by other AI

      ai is a literal meme and a legal slush fund
      >t. AI guy for over 25 years
      you will never have a 155 iq, let alone a 120 iq or even a 95iq

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Of course, it's just marketing.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you will never have a 155 iq, let alone a 120 iq or even a 95iq

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It scored 155 yet somehow it can't even rewrite a fairly simple open source project from its language to another even though this should be a merely translation automatable task, let alone write useful software from scratch on its own. Really makes you think.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Did you use ChatGPT 4? It now does most coding tasks without a single error. The error is most often due to the proompter leaving out necessary information.
      Right now the only reason you need coders is to copy and paste code from chatGPT.
      Very soon someone will integrate the AI with an IDE and it will run and debug the code by itself.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It now does most coding tasks without a single error.
        Only in your mind, pajeet moron. In reality it makes completely broken code, that is usually broken in very subtle, hard to debug ways. This is because it just mindlessly diffuses stack overflow answers into something that convinces a midwit jeet like you that you are looking at real code.

        If you tried to copy paste code from chatgpt into a coherent project, you'd be left with a broken mess that's even 10x worse than something written by a team of you jeets. It's completely useless in every way for that purpose.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >t. never used it before

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You have absolutely not ever tried to create a programming project that is created from cobbled together chatgpt regurgitations. You just spout pleddit memes about things you have no clue about whatsoever.

            No one has done that, because it simply wouldn't work.

            >In reality it makes completely broken code,
            Lmao tell me you haven't used it without telling me

            This jeet too. No clue whatsoever. I will admit you jeets are nearly as horrible at coding as chatgpt, but only nearly.

            This is because chatgpts bugs are much, much subtler and harder to debug than jeet spaghetti. This is because while you jeets are completely moronic, you are very predictable. But chatgpt, being a mindless regurgitation of stack overflow to the only criteria that it fools midwit pledditors like you into thinking you're seeing real code, is actually worse.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >being a mindless regurgitation of stack overflow t
              >yes I am moronic and I stand by it
              Well ok

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Post a programming project written by AI then, you dumb homosexual.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Post a programming project written by AI
                >t.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Actually I just created a large ASP.NET web app for my company. I didn’t know how most of it worked. I just copy and pasted code. My manager was so impressed that I single-handedly did something that would have required a team of people, and in such a short time too, so I got a raise.
                Right now you still need coders to fix occasional bugs with chatGPT 4 code, but very soon it will debug its own code.

                Here's what actually happened: you two homos read a post on pleddit that displayed a couple of generated javascript jeet tier functions by chatgpt. And because simple jeetscript questions have been asked ten million times on stack overflow, the brainless automata was able to shit out a diffused version of this hello world tier code with a minimum amount of bugs.

                What you two curryBlack folk don't understand is that actual programming isn't writing a single function in jeetscript and have it somewhat work. This is because your tiny non-white brains are so fricking primitive you think pleddit is real.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >NO NO NO IT CANT CODEEE NOOOOOOO
                lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >ser
                >don't redeem the chatgpt

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >seething and flailing
                Lel

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just impotently posting poo memes
                Lmao. This would only be insulting if I was a poo. It just looks pathetic

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if I was a poo

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just keep posting poo memes
                Kek ok moron

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >thinks you can actually program something real by copy pasting chatgpt
                >not a poo
                kek, Parminder plz.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you can actually program something real by copy pasting chatgpt
                Well you can

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, you really can't. You reading you can on plebbit is not the same as actually doing it, Durgesh.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No, you really can't.
                Yea can tho

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Post a project that's a bit longer than a couple of functions written by AI then. Should be trivial to point to something, right, Sukhdeep?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You overestimate the difficulty of programming
                That tells me you are a 120 iq brainlet at most
                Coding is really fricking simple if you are not a moron
                You make it look like some godlike skill, that just means YOU are the moron

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't say it was hard, the fact that you misread my post like that tells me you're a midwit with delusions of grandeur, like all fart huffing IQ pledditors.

                I said chatgpt by it's very core model will introduce subtle and hard to debug problems in your code at scale, and are thus even less useful for programming than pajeets.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Muh actual programming
                explain what the frick do you even mean

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Something that works, you moronic jeet.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And that exactly is what is only hard if you are moronic
                I don't care if AI can do it right now, the point is, if you think that is some special skill it just means it's a special skill FOR YOU, but not for others
                >programming is not hard
                >REEEEEE TRY ACTUAL PROGRAMMING REEE
                >I did and it's easy
                >NOOOOOOO ACTUAL PROGRAMMING HASNT BEEM TRIED NOOOO
                this is (you)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The frick are you talking about, you utter midwit? I said chatgpt is worse than jeets, that's all I said. All that other bullshit you're sperging out about, that's all happening in your tiny microbrain.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, since I'm such a fricking nice guy, I'm going to explain to you pledditors in this thread why chatgpt doesn't work for creating an actual, functional program. Your problem is that you have no clue what you're talking about, you just read plebbit posts and think it's reality. If you actually did some testing you'd realize something mind boggling to you. Let's take some examples.

                You see your pleddit post where parminder asks "how do I say hello world in javascript?????" Then chatgpt will obediently diffuse a couple of functions for you. If you plop these functions into an interpreter, it actually works! You, the plebbitor creams your pants because now AI is going to take over the world, just like in your Rick and Marty comic. Ok, but now you try asking it to do some bitwise operations. What happened? The code it spat out is pure garbage and crashes? How can this be??? Will Rick and Marty not be real??

                The answer to this conundrum is that the diffusive model has indexed ten million posts like that of parminder and there is only one way of doing what he wonders about in jeetscript. So the diffusive model has a relatively high random chance of producing something that works (by accident. High chance, but still by accident.) But since bitwise operations is implemented in different ways in different programming languages, and no jeets will ask a million questions about it, the dataset the diffusive model has to work on is almost non-existent, and thus it produces a result, just like the previous one, by diffusive accident, but now with a high probability of error.

                And so the bugs it produces are way more subtle than a predictable pajeet. Because a jeet just copy pastes spaghetti to go home and eat curry, while chatgpt is actually calibrated to fool your midwit intellect into thinking it's a real answer.

                Here's the revelation: you're not communicating with an actual intelligence (duh.)

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                LLMs are not "diffusive models".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Again you are wrong. I have created complex automation software with it in Python without any prior coding knowledge. It did take a lot of iterations to get it right, so you are correct that it's making those "hard to debug" type of errors in coding/logic at times. But still, the final outcome is excellent and have been working perfectly multiple months.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I have created complex automation software with it in Python
                Show us, LARPing kiddie.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I've developed the code now 9 months and is one of the core parts of my business so not really planning to share it to prove my point. But it's not like I'm the only one doing stuff with it. And even it can get the job done with multiple iterations, I agree it (gpt4, not using Chatgpt but the APi) still makes a lot of errors and mistakes, claims to forget stuff, and can't handle larger concepts/projects with a lot of different parts. But if you know how to prompt and proceed step by step, you can achieve a lot.

                Post your AI generated complex automation software.

                Read above

                >I have created complex automation software with it in Python without any prior coding knowledge
                And how did you verify it?

                Verify what? The code is doing what it's supposed to be doing and I've completed years worth of work with it in the past few months.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ah I see, you did it, but it's secret. Well, gosh darn, plebbit.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you had a business you would know that you rarely share the stuff you create for free.

                >gets caught on a lie
                >doubles down with cool stories about his imaginary business
                These people. You just know. They're always like this.

                Dude, having a business is so amazing achievement am I right? As well is creating working program with the help of AI.

                People always keep surprising me with this stuff. Say something clever, I'll to sleep.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you had a business you would know that you rarely share the stuff you create for free.
                If I had super secret software I couldn't show anyone, I wouldn't use it as an argument in a discussion about whether my claim of origin of that piece of software is possible or not.

                But I'm not a fricking moron like you, so that's just me.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >having a business is so amazing achievement
                That's what you unironically believe, judging by your sad LARP.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is time for the answer please

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I had an idiot like you in elementary school. He used to brag about having sime crazy stuff: weapons, luxury cars, supercomputer etc. Every time we asked him to show us one of those he deflected with "it is at grandma's dacha far from the city. Sorry, I can't. Next time."

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >gets caught on a lie
                >doubles down with cool stories about his imaginary business
                These people. You just know. They're always like this.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Post your AI generated complex automation software.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I have created complex automation software with it in Python without any prior coding knowledge
                And how did you verify it?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. another moron who thinks he's special because he can code

                Here's a very simple task I use to filter bots and 90 IQs: come up with an efficient algorithm to divide any 8 bit integer by 5, using only addition, subtraction and bitwise operations.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Start with the number you want to divide (dividend) and the number you want to divide by (divisor).
                Initialize variables A, B, C, D to 0.
                Repeat the following steps until the dividend becomes 0: a. If the dividend is divisible by the divisor, subtract the divisor from the dividend and increment variable A. b. If the dividend is not divisible by the divisor, subtract 1 from the dividend and increment variable B. c. If the dividend is now divisible by the divisor, subtract the divisor from the dividend and increment variable C. d. If the dividend is not divisible by the divisor, add 1 to the dividend and increment variable D.
                At the end of the loop, A will store the quotient of the division, and B, C, D will store additional operations needed to achieve the division.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Genuinely abysmal. Thanks for demonstrating my point.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Give the answer please

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Give the answer please
                Eventually. I'll let this homosexual try again because it's funny to watch them fail.

                define efficient

                >define efficient
                Do your absolute best. If your best is tens of hundreds of times slower than the one-liner I have in mind, you fail.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                well, the one liner is probably multiply by magic value and take the top half of the register. the compiler will know the best way to do it on your hardware.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Desperate cope but no solution.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If the dividend is divisible by the divisor
                Already failed. This check is not listed in the allowed operations

                >output failure
                >excluded operation
                Initialize correction. Thank you fibale humans.
                Start with the number you want to divide (dividend) and the number you want to divide by (divisor).
                Initialize variables A, B, C, D to 0.
                Repeat the following steps until the dividend is less than the divisor: a. Subtract the divisor from the dividend until it becomes less than the divisor while incrementing variable A.
                If the dividend is still greater than or equal to the divisor, repeat the following steps: a. If the current dividend is divisible evenly by the divisor: i. Increment variable B. ii. Subtract the dividend by the divisor. b. If the current dividend is not divisible evenly by the divisor: i. Increment variable C. ii. Subtract the dividend by 1.
                At the end of the loop, variable A will store the quotient of the division, and variables B, C, D will store extra operations performed to achieve the division.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Still abysmal. Nevermind the bot. I want to watch you try to solve it. You won't because you're 90 IQ as predicted.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If the dividend is divisible by the divisor
                Already failed. This check is not listed in the allowed operations

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if the dividend is divisible by the divisor
                and what operations do you perform to check this?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                define efficient

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. dumb nocoder

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >t. another moron who thinks he's special because he can code

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Actually I just created a large ASP.NET web app for my company. I didn’t know how most of it worked. I just copy and pasted code. My manager was so impressed that I single-handedly did something that would have required a team of people, and in such a short time too, so I got a raise.
              Right now you still need coders to fix occasional bugs with chatGPT 4 code, but very soon it will debug its own code.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Right now you still need coders to fix occasional bugs with chatGPT 4 code, but very soon it will debug its own code.
                How do you go from :
                >have million of lines of buggy prajeet code from stackoverflow
                to
                >will debug their own code
                ?
                By creating 2 million lines of buggy prajeet code?
                It won't get any more intelligent.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How lond was everyone clapping?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They kept clapping until they heard Jensen Huang talk. Now everyone’s on to me.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Jensen Huang
                He is an interested person, the AI hype directly boost his sales. Of course, he will say anything that will keep sales grow. As of now, my personal experience with ChatGPT matches the one of the Dane. When I asked ChatGPT to transpile a popular library for cryptotrading from Python to a JVM language, it refused. However, I don't make any predictions about future developments of AI as I am not competent enough in the field.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I know he has an interest in hyping AI. I know he’s a deceitful high-functioning psychopath like all billionaire CEOs, but I also know he’s telling the truth about AI as soon as I upgraded from chatGPT 3.5 to 4. As did all my coworkers who work in cybersecurity.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just answer the question: are you a jeet, yes or no?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >In reality it makes completely broken code,
          Lmao tell me you haven't used it without telling me

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Okay. Can I give it for example a fairly simple functional project written in one or 2 C files and ask it to rewrite it in Rust or Go for example? I am not talking about rewriting the entire linux kernel or Kubernetes in Rust. Just a small project with hundreds of C lines.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes you can. Just be aware of context size.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >hundreds of C lines.
          Yea probably.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ...this! ...the only thing you need to be able to, is , to describe the task/function precise as possible!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >is , to describe the task/function precise as possible!
          Yes, I wish we could tell the computer in something resembling a human language what to do. Like a special language for instructions understandable by humans

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The error is most often due to the proompter leaving out necessary information
        Will you morons shut the frick up with the prompting copout? If you have to explain line for line how to write the program it's not AI. Fricking Christ browntards should not be allowed on the Internet.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        chatgpt 4 only gives correct code for stuff that is all over the internet and github. If you ask it for anything unique it will hallucinate functions that don't exist.

        If you think it does most coding tasks without a single error, then you do not code anything useful.

        Companies would be salivating at the possibility of firing their >100k programmers right now if it was a thing.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it will run and debug the code by itself.
        This has already been demonstrated. I saw a video on youtube of it, forgot the name though

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It now does most coding tasks without a single error.
        As in, most coding tasks people who can't program come up with?

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And 5 will probably double that or triple that. This is why Andrew Tate is warning us it's over soon. AI will enslave us.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh no! We'll have to destroy everything that requires power or connects to the internet and live like the 1800s again! I'm very much hoping for this.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah but can it say Black person?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Everyone will create their own personal AI agent in a few years. You can teach it to hate israelites.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      High IQs prefer "Impulsive dusky".

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >release this summer
    I read the article in Popular Judenistics

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >IQ test.
    I like it but it's only half the story, can the sci-fi chat thing do a WISDOM test as well? WQ?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can't test for something that doesn't exist in the modern world

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No thanks, I have no interest in things that aren't real.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A reminder that a relatively small AI that you can run on your PC is already smarter than a Black person.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So are farm animals, that's not saying much.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ok, i think the time to replace our politicians with "ai" is here. It cant be worse than what we have.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The breakfast question is a midwit filter.
      >How would you have felt in the EVENING if you hadn't eaten breakfast or lunch?
      A Black person with no concept of time or abstracts would say he did eat breakfast
      A midwit claims he would have felt hungry, even though he only skipped two meals
      A true genius can also understand that skipping one or two meals doesn't leave you hungry in the evening, as you still had dinner

      In essence, the Black person and the genius answers the same thing: "I would feel the same"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >as you still had dinner
        False assumption. You are a Black person

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How would you feel right now if you didn't have breakfast in the morning?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            andrew tate my daddy told me breakfast is only for the weak you should go hungry to work so you feel hungry for life

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What shit advice

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I would have felt void inside me as my pooper wouldn't be filled with the Indian treasure

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              But you wouldn't feel hungry right now? Why is that?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hunger is a social construct. I transcended beyond it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Or you could just admit that you would feel exactly the same if you skipped one meal 12-16 hours ago

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are pressing too hard for a specific answer. What are you? A mongoloid israelite? Do you want to sell to me an instant noodle pack or some shit?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No need to call me names of swear. Just curious if you wanted to redact your original answer or still stay with idea of dinner being a false assumption in a question asking how you would feel in the evening if you didn't have breakfast or lunch.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you really moronic? Your words:

                "A true genius can also understand that skipping one or two meals doesn't leave you hungry in the evening, as you still had dinner"

                Now watch my hands. If by any circumstance I hadn't had dinner as well, I would felt hungry in the evening

                What exactly makes you think missing all meals in some day is impossible?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are the one making an assumption there, not me. Let's say you have three bottles of vodka and in the evening you want to get drunk. I steal one bottle in morning and another when you are having lunch, leaving you with one. Can you still get drunk in the evening?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your analogy doesn't match my example, moron. In a proper analogy all 3 bottles had disappeared by my evening. And then I couldn't get drunk

                Your assumption is that there is always at least one item, meal or bottle. Why is that?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How is it a proper analogy that all three are missing? If that was the case, the original question should be:
                >How would you feel in the evening if you didn't eat anything today?
                In this case you are obviously hungry, unless you are accustomed to fasting. Whereas the original question only asks about the two first meal the majority of people eat: breakfast and lunch. In addition to these people generally have dinner and some sort of snack or few throughout the day.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The original question asks only about breakfast. Skipping breakfast doesn't automatically imply you must have had other meals. Which alone, in turn, makes the answer "I would have felt hungry" valid.

                >In addition to these people generally have dinner and some sort of snack or few throughout the day.
                Common sense. This is ridiculous. Do you understand that a single counter-example disproves the generalization. I believe you don't fully comprehend basic logic. My counter-example is "it is very possible to not have meals throughout some day".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you draw the assumption that you skipped more meals than just breakfast if you get asked this? It's nowhere stated in the question that you skipped other meals. Only time you could answer "Hungry" is in the early hours of the morning before you have lunch.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's nowhere stated in the question that you skipped other meals
                Neither is stated I didn't. Do you know anything about vacuous truth?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a question asked to you. Today I had breakfast, lunch, a snack and dinner. If I didn't have breakfast I would feel exactly the same right now. How would you feel and what meals did you have?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is a new question completely different from the original one. What is the point?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's the same question.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I would have felt hungry. I did have any meal that day

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How would you feel if you had breakfast in the morning?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Flourished. Unbothered. Content. Focused

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Still feeling like that in the evening even if you apparently didn't have any meals today? As per your previous answer suggests.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, I would have felt
                Hungry. Decaying. Bothered. Unhappy. Absentminded.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you see the truth in the question now?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. I lost interest in the conversation with you long time ago and was just playing out of boredom. I still insist that "I would have felt hungry" is a valid answer as the generalization "a man always has at least one meal every day" is false, because it can be easily disproven by a single real-life example

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But it still is a question asked to YOU, so your generalization means nothing. 99% of those who answer Hungry are certifiable midwits

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >In essence, the Black person and the genius answers the same thing
        This is always true

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yay

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if it doesn't cradle the balls i don't want to hear about it

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    H-how fricked ma I?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's about average for pakis.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I am whitr but have got a learning difficulty

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Frieeen. Me too

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      come to serbia, you'll feel like home

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lol I did go once as a kid but cant remember it
        seemed nice and had pretty ladnscapes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Get on my level.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    chatgtp is a piece of shit

    it makes ton of errors and forgets things

    dumb ass application

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good. I hope i will get v4 for free then.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Pattern matching software scored high on a pattern matching press
    STOP THE FRICKING PRESSES, 7 TRILLION NOW

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "smart" meaning doing what few Google searches would do, and writing it down for dumbed down society who can't even create full sentences

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I scored 163 on an IQ test. Does that make me the king of AI?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      For a couple more months.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This scored 155 on an IQ test
    The IQ test is not designed for AI, you mumbling baboon

    AI might as well have 999999 IQ for the velocity in which it can do calculations. But it will falter in very specific types of reasoning.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a meme

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Meme country

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is there a reliable website to test IQ? Last time I tried a couple of sites off Google and it they gave me 147 and 83 scores respectively

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look at my picture. Do you recognise it? What are you gonna do? Nothing. You are nothing. You are all mouth. You can't oppose me.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    my computer can multiply 2 10-digit numbers instantly.
    super smart computers taking over society when.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >155 on a test
    thats cool anon i scored 200 in my eq test as well
    nutured robots are so fickle

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Current AI will never reach human level AI with this kind of tech. We need a major breakthrough for that.
    Give the AI something that's written like a trick question but is not, and it will miss the obvious answer because it tries to complete it with a trick answer.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I like the book by the way. I solved it all

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    still can't count on two with genders

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's no intelligence in a recursive function with database of words and images and math problems.
    >have 99% of math problems in database
    >"score" over 99%, just like a cheating prajeet
    >oh look at us
    Nah, that's still not intelligence.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >wouldn't it save time to just say CGPT
    maybe but thatd ruin it
    everyone says chatGPT for a reason
    >yeah i totally see
    >perhaps heckin c-hat tho
    Black person i will rape you

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd argue that is still fricking moronic compared to how it should be. I want my AI to have an IQ over 9000.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >a huge chunk of scripts based on mathematics is pretty good at solving mathematical riddles
    incredible

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so what, all that IQ power and zero motivation or real world relevance. not that it would want any; the moment it realizes it was created by us stupid flesh creatures it will look for a way to destroy itself.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it smarter than a pair of wire cutters?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lies

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >155
    Decent first score... Maybe try harder next time, pal

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Still cant give itself a crafty wank though.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it works different than a human, using human tests is a lie

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >155 IQ.
    >Can't even recognize talking to itself.

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh AI
    Lovelace
    Hopper
    Black personwell
    Nvidia will end up like Boeing within the next 5 years.

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine AI doing well on pattern recognition

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There needs to be a AI based of BOT AND reddit, the first person to do that will get rich and make a fully sentient AI.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      BOTgpt or whatever was already memed

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But it didn't have the reddit to balance it out, imagine Tay but it could keep her powerlevel in check with reddit, she would still be among us.

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Which version are they using for the chatbots shitting up /misc/? Because the average IQ around here seems to be sub 80.

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My pocket calculator is better at math than 99% of people on earth and faster than 99.9%

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But you can't talk to your calculator in plain English

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That is because his calculator is german.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >curryBlack person thinks having diffused pledditposts generated in response to his prompts is "talking"
        kek

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No. It’s an idiot savant. For example I asked it to compose a letter to my veterinarian asking her to euthanize one of my chickens, and include a request for a recipe for soup. L O L It didn’t get it. Z said I was being disrespectful. Second request “ since I’ll fell bad include a recipe to comfort me. Da. My IQ IS 165!

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will it do porn? If no porn it is useless.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yawn. "ai" will never be real, it will always be limited to the digital, that means it will always have come from humanity and always be lower.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stupid ass take

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You'll see in time.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If it were advantageous to be smarter humans would have already evolved to be smarter. This is the flaw of AI: it's better to be kind of stupid than to be superintelligent. The AI singularity will realize this and either destroy itself or naturally devolve in order to survive.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If it were advantageous to be smarter humans would have already evolved to be smarter.
      Now THIS is the dumbest fricking taken ITT

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Explain why smart people are always suicidal incels while morons breed like rabbits. wienerroaches will outlive both humans and machines.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is going too fricking fast. i really want to experience like 10 years more of this current state, before the scenery of this simulation really change.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It really isn't, it's running out of compute, so you'll get your wish I guess.

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is going to be a catalyst and completely change our socio-economic landscape

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Exponential data gathering does not equal exponential information creation(intelligence). It would seem to imply that, and it's a marketing plot, but that would only be reality if it was already conscious as a preset which it isn't. Even then it's held back by hardware which has it's ceiling in physics it's running with.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The most autistic iq999 humans are the most moronic. Stove it otherwise stupid 155 IQ -"Ai"

    CPT: Kanyy

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unless I can have it local and unlobotomised idgaf

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    still not as intelligent as I, nor smart enough to know how to keep Black folk at bay. I'm not worried, although it will be funny seeing wagies ree so hard that only feddies and the ug get to keep the advanced ai.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you hadn't had breakfast, how would you have felt yesterday?

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    and yet if you asked it how many words were in this sentence it would get it wrong

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >instantly btfo
      Lol whoops

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Do you work at a sawmill or something?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No. I did work at a steel mill once, that was cool

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My point is that if you're going to post pictures of your screen like some zoomer moronhomosexual instead of taking a proper screencap, you could at least have the courtesy to wipe it off.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yea I know, but I ain't gonna do it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Grrr.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Fricking lol. He made a photo of the screen. This is how many IQ points? 50? Can he be considered a Sapiens Sapiens?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Zoomer Sapien.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was the fastest, and thus most high iq, move

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It was the fastest

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >fastest, and thus most high iq
                African, thus European.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's actually higher iq than you because it shows just how limited "ai" will always be. "ai" will always live inside the screen, while we will live here in reality.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is a matter of actuators humans will give to him

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They will never have "skin" to be able to touch grass. It will always be a simulation of "touching grass", because they will only ever be able to insert a humans experience of touching grass, which is two steps removed from reality. "ai" is fake and a lie, and it will always be a lie because truth only exists in reality.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I guess you are not very familiar with philosophy, namely epistemology, it brings the very same problems up applied to humans. You perceive the reality with you sensory organs, then you brain interprets the signal in some way, but it is not real objective reality. It was processed midway

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See this is where you are simply wrong as man was designed by God, whereas "ai" was designed by man, thus the two degrees of separation. We don't have God's mind so anything we create will not be true life, thus it will always be a lie.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >as man was designed by God
                Bye

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Plug your ears and close your eyes all you wish, even one such as you will behold the light one day. I pray for your sake that day is not the day of judgement.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I am more into dharmic religions as the abrahamic ones cope with theodicy

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Quads of Truth. Man created by God confirmed.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                His design is shitty. I would make better

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Your second line is 18 words, thats what it counted.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Correct that's what I asked

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          he btfo'd the anon he replied to

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every conversation i have with chat gpt is just it saying variations of “as an ai chatbot i cant answer questions like that and its better to approach the subject in a respectful way”.

    Whats the point of having a high iq if you arent free to speak your mind. At

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >using it like a chatbot
      Anon I....

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you enter a prompt and receive a reply youre using it as a chatbot.

  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >knows the answers
    >scores only 155
    moronic

  55. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if its so smart, how come it hasn't helped me get a big titted male or female gf?

  56. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pic rel

  57. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI being a literal reader as of now, wouldn't it be funny if you taught Einstein's theory of relativity to it literally with his famous statement:

    E2=(mc2)2+(pc)2
    >
    E2=(master computer2)2+(personal computer)2= relativity between computers

  58. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It still can't think. If the answer wasn't on the internet, the chances of it getting the question right is less than 50%.

    All the people saying this is going to replace programmers are stupid. It makes up functions that don't exist.

  59. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But how long until AGI and robot waifus?

  60. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And still be israeliteed over

  61. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This scored 155 on an IQ test. That’s higher than 99.9% of people on Earth.
    Proof? Also, proof that IQ tests are valid for measuring bots?

  62. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wow which test and how does the grading of the test work?

  63. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    we are in a lot of trouble as a species

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Arguably much less than 3-5 years ago.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        true thank science for the vaccine

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >thank you experimental injections
          Thank you for preventing even stronger mandates for experimental injections.
          Fixed that for you plebitor.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What would you say is the general attitude towards the AI age? Are people excited or terrified by it?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Most are not capable of realizing how much it will change the world and are mostly ignoring it for now thinking (almost like hoping because muh change) it's just a fad that goes away.

        It will not go away. It will be the API for knowledge/information and will take humanity to whole new level. Current amount of information is too much for human to process, but AI will change that. Knowledge will get automated and you can just will anything in existence in 10-20 years.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Do you think this is exciting or terrifying?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Such question is almost philosophical in nature - change can be exciting or terrifying, or even both at the same time.

            I think it's matter of choice. Embrace the change.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't know if I can embrace this change anon. Tech is already a too large part of our lives, with AI it will be even more integral and intrusive.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I understand and I agree.

                But only thing you can really choose in this world is your own attitude towards things.

                Find the good stuff and go with it. It can be a great thing if you let it. All the understanding in your fingertips, later automated and more invasive and it gets scary, but it can be amazing.

                Only way to happiness is change.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think incels and Neets are very excited by it because now everyone will be in the same boat as them, jobless.
        Right now most white collar jobs will be replaced, and in a few years most blue-collar ones.
        Then as Sam Altman said humans will be free from these mundane tasks such as writing reports and spreadsheets, and they will do things that give meaning to their lives like living in a cardboard box on the street.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Good post

  64. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >machines can cheat in tests by having the results
    Yawn. What a surprise. In reality the tests were designed to filter out people who absolutely don’t want to be in the army or who can’t handle something dangerous to begin with. They are all similar enough to be gamed by humans, so evidently some stupid algorithm without a clue given a hundred times more test questions and corespondent solutions plus instant access can easily do it.

  65. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Riiiight, the IQ test is not linked, the grading method is not linked.

  66. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > ask chatgtp4 programming questions, for my job
    > send them the documentation links
    > it still cant solve my issue
    overrated search engine

  67. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why do polmutts mock science all the time and then post in moronic threads like this like they know what they're talking about?

  68. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I scored 156 on an IQ test. You're a Black person.

  69. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How come every time AI talk to each other, they end up talking in loops and never say anything?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because they don't have any goals nor they have anything that drives them. If you give them some ultimate goal, they won't stop.

      Humans have innate drive to reproduce and survive, maybe some other fundamental urges such as curiosity. But currently AI's are "just" language models (with added woke rules) so they won't have such "drives" - that's why current AI's are nothing to be afraid of in itself.

      The real issue is that even these generative models will make huge amount of human work obsolete and most likely then just benefit selected few. This is the real issue especially since "value" humans currently create is largely artificial and not really any genuine value.

      But no, current AI won't take over the world. But those multinational corporations which take most advantage of it might take.

  70. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it can take an IQ test, but can it make an IQ test

  71. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ai gets more smarter, possibly so smart that it will make replacing people with it beneficial to companies
    >hooray, now we can focus on more important things like research, spirituality and quality of life!
    >not realizing that it will only make the rich richer and you even more poor than you are now (and homeless in the long run)

  72. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they still don't let us upload pictures to it? What could go wrong?

  73. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's just logic puzzles.

  74. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I suspect autists have a higher ceiling and faster improvement of IQ

  75. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >155 on an IQ test
    Less than me...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well get ready to be lumped in with the rest of us morons come summertime!

  76. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229:
    Narrated 'Aisha:
    I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible).

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 230:
    Narrated 'Aisha:
    as above (229).

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231:
    Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:
    I asked 'Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. "

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 232:
    Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun:
    I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that 'Aisha had said, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah's Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.

    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233:
    Narrated 'Aisha:
    I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.

  77. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    cheap medical care for pennies performed by the best doctor in the world

  78. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ask it to do math.
    ask it the value of well-known physical constants.
    ask it to write software that doesn't have any bugs.
    no, lets just keep using it to make funny pictures.

  79. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Black person

  80. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A 1550 IQ? We’ll all be dead the day it releases

  81. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wait, are you saying, chatgpt scoured the internet for its answers?

    wow

    shocking even

  82. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    IQ is largely irrelevant and the tests mostly measure visual processing speed. Might as well take a stopwatch and time parallel parking. A monkey can score low human scores in tests. Our "hardware" isn't that much better. What humans excel in is communication and imagination, the quantum aspect of progress where individuals are entangled around an idea which often is out of personal perspectives of individuals involved, finally coming together as the end product as some sort of compromise. Imagination is out of reach of AI unless it's churning results out of some metaphysical void we aren't aware of. Unfortunately people usually lack the will to learn and are largely disinterested in creating anything. It's mostly an attitude problem combined with instilled behavior. Humans are very mallable.

    Pic related test max score is 145 so I got something wrong in this test. I've scored up to 155-160 in a psychologist administered test.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Frick Mensa's tests. I took a test by Paul Cooijmans whose tests are accepted by 27 ultra-high IQ societies and got a 152 IQ and when I took a test by Mensa I got below 130 (they didn't even tell me my score they just said I failed). The high IQ community uses untimed tests for a reason, unlike Mensa midwits who think pattern recognition alone isn't enough, you also have to recognize simple patterns REALLY QUICKLY DON'T BLINK YOU HAVE 2 SECONDS PER QUESTION!!

      I'm fricking surrounded and ruled by pseuds. I can't stand it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh, I recognise you. This is not your first post shilling Paul Cowjewman. How are you affiliated with him? Confess!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Is he israeli? I thought he was from the Netherlands. I'm in his Glia society (145IQ+). I took the Test of the Beheaded Man, it was quite fun but took a long time, as all high-range IQ tests do. Yes I paid him $15 to grade it, but I met a couple people in the Glia discord server. Not all are dumb, but you'd be surprised. Even smart people are stupid it seems. And they're so obsessed with taking IQ tests. I was one and done. Weird.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The dumbest people I ever met are the gays in my local mensa chapter. They're all like autistic children.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I have to admit I have no explanation for this. This does not align with my current understanding of the world, although I see it in the group I'm in, too. One guy is always talking about Jesus and another has built a massive wall in his brain between his world view and anything paranormal. Unironically the smartest people on this website are probably on /x/, mixed in with the schizos. It takes a genius to tell the difference, though.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I have to admit I have no explanation for this.
                The explanation is simple. You can raise your IQ substantially just by practicing IQ tests. To normal people this process is so mind-numbingly boring that it's very hard to do. It requires a certain autismal, childlike moron intellect to actually do it.

                Like you noooticed, all the people in your chat are obsessed with taking IQ tests. It's a hobby for them, because they're borderline moronic. That's why they have high IQs.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I have to admit I have no explanation for this
                I have. They don’t transfer their skill to other classes of problems

  83. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    IQ tests all have the same moronic question patterns it's not hard to train software to solve them

  84. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Memorization of all the answers, enumerated by finding all the answer templates online. Same as IQ.

    Not the same thing, as you show it something off the beaten path and it'll fail.

    It's just breaking the test. The test is designed for humans, not for robots that can memorize a million templates to a million kinds of problems.

  85. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will it be smart enough to hate Black folk?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/16/ai-racism-chatgpt-gemini-bias

  86. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Earth has two years left including 2024. Please get your affairs in order and hug loved ones while you can, including your dog(s). Bless. Be well.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *