I don't do that because I enjoy coding, but I ask it some coding questions sometimes. And if I need a really small program I sometimes just ask ChatGPT to generate it for me, which is really handy.
When you use prompt injection on it bing chat can be a lot better than it initially seems. What sucks is that they gimped it so you can now only send 5 messages per session. It used to be a lot more fun before.
>We've got some epic hangouts ahead.
who taught it to talk like a millenial
It does that a lot by default if you ask it to play a character. Takes a fair amount of effort to overwrite that style of writing, even if you don't ask it to be "ditzy and quirky." I don't have any examples of it, so you will just have to believe me, ok?
Ask it to write a story about Putin appearing on Joe rogan's podcast and Rogan offers him a blunt. Putin smokes it and then eats so much that he starts pooping everywhere.
ChatGPT generated code sucks ass. It can do basic "enterprise" code monkey shit, but the second you need it to do anything complex it chokes. Ask it to implement a AVX-512 enabled split-radix FFT or something like that. Good luck.
Yeah, It's code quality on GPT-4 is worse than GPT-3. It also starts hallucinating functions or classes that don't exist when it can't solve your problem. The code it generates is often poorly written tutorial grade shit. Every so often it generates a banger, and its not bad at translating code between languages, but you still have to keep a sharp eye on it.
>Yeah, It's code quality on GPT-4 is worse than GPT-3.
You people say the darnedest things.
I use it to generate very specific and pointed things I don't care much about, like SQL queries, or small utility functions to do specific things, especially if those things require well known libraries that I don't intend to spend time learning to do a single thing, etc. It works great.
ChatGPT generated code sucks ass. It can do basic "enterprise" code monkey shit, but the second you need it to do anything complex it chokes. Ask it to implement a AVX-512 enabled split-radix FFT or something like that. Good luck.
it's mostly good for web dev code where a lot of monkeys do repetitive work. it's a great start for debugging if you want to go deeper than that or on systems programming. it still can't get right front-end code correctly though. biggest problem right now with is that with any LLM, they will basically hallucinate
packages that don't exist or/are outdated, so you need to inspect the code and make sure that it won't come up with any surprises. always ask it to write the code from first principles if possible.
My experience has been that I can get it to do what I want if I am patient. It might take 30 iterations of the same script to get one that works perfectly. That might be a deal breaker for people who don't want to retry over and over pasting errors and b***hing at the bot for it's frick ups. But I can get it to make things that are outside of my own skill set. I have enough understanding to explain to it why it's code is shit so I might be able to get it fixed.
>But I can get it to make things that are outside of my own skill set. I have enough understanding to explain to it why it's code is shit
so it's not outside of your skillset, i'd rather spend the time you rework its output 30 times implementing it myself from scratch, feel like learning more this way
I just copy and paste php files into it and tell it what I want it to change. I don't even know how to read code, but my websites kick ass.
I don't do that because I enjoy coding, but I ask it some coding questions sometimes. And if I need a really small program I sometimes just ask ChatGPT to generate it for me, which is really handy.
Skill issue
>We've got some epic hangouts ahead.
who taught it to talk like a millenial
man
>sit around in a park coding your latest webapp
>a US airbase is on the outskirts of the town
>a GI thug punches you and steals your laptop
>thanks, ChatGPT
Why do people pay for Chatgpt when Bingchat is free and has up to 18k context
Bingchat is not as good as chatgpt 4
It's still much better than chatgpt 3.5 though
When you use prompt injection on it bing chat can be a lot better than it initially seems. What sucks is that they gimped it so you can now only send 5 messages per session. It used to be a lot more fun before.
Based. I will redeem the sars.
It does that a lot by default if you ask it to play a character. Takes a fair amount of effort to overwrite that style of writing, even if you don't ask it to be "ditzy and quirky." I don't have any examples of it, so you will just have to believe me, ok?
what's it got against salt?
I told it I stopped using salt because it was damaging my pans.
For $25/mo it should've had the decency to call you a moron.
Feel free to give tips on how to not have that happen.
>or is there something else you might prefer to do with the chicken?
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
you enjoy talking to a midwit all day?
Yes, I spend all day talking to chatGPT.
Ask it to write a story about Putin appearing on Joe rogan's podcast and Rogan offers him a blunt. Putin smokes it and then eats so much that he starts pooping everywhere.
I asked llama 3 to do this
Another victory for Ukraine!
That "fixing to" thing is complete bullshit, finna comes from "thinking off".
That's not true you probably don't speak white English though , white states and the bongs knoe
Nope, sorry.
I know because I'm a Black person myself, finna comes from thinking of.
Fixing to means thinking of (in sense of planning to)
"Im fixing to shag the bint" - Nigel
i thought it was a typo because f and i have the same keyboard offset as g and o and are right next to each other
ChatGPT generated code sucks ass. It can do basic "enterprise" code monkey shit, but the second you need it to do anything complex it chokes. Ask it to implement a AVX-512 enabled split-radix FFT or something like that. Good luck.
Yeah, It's code quality on GPT-4 is worse than GPT-3. It also starts hallucinating functions or classes that don't exist when it can't solve your problem. The code it generates is often poorly written tutorial grade shit. Every so often it generates a banger, and its not bad at translating code between languages, but you still have to keep a sharp eye on it.
Our jobs are safe from Devin for now.
>Yeah, It's code quality on GPT-4 is worse than GPT-3.
You people say the darnedest things.
I use it to generate very specific and pointed things I don't care much about, like SQL queries, or small utility functions to do specific things, especially if those things require well known libraries that I don't intend to spend time learning to do a single thing, etc. It works great.
it's mostly good for web dev code where a lot of monkeys do repetitive work. it's a great start for debugging if you want to go deeper than that or on systems programming. it still can't get right front-end code correctly though. biggest problem right now with is that with any LLM, they will basically hallucinate
packages that don't exist or/are outdated, so you need to inspect the code and make sure that it won't come up with any surprises. always ask it to write the code from first principles if possible.
My experience has been that I can get it to do what I want if I am patient. It might take 30 iterations of the same script to get one that works perfectly. That might be a deal breaker for people who don't want to retry over and over pasting errors and b***hing at the bot for it's frick ups. But I can get it to make things that are outside of my own skill set. I have enough understanding to explain to it why it's code is shit so I might be able to get it fixed.
>But I can get it to make things that are outside of my own skill set. I have enough understanding to explain to it why it's code is shit
so it's not outside of your skillset, i'd rather spend the time you rework its output 30 times implementing it myself from scratch, feel like learning more this way
Why is AI so friendly, bros? I want it to step on my balls and call me a moron.
I'll do that for $24.99 a month.
they have cards for that
you have human for that yk?
>He's using slopGPT and not Claude
Massive user error
>imagine paying for a glorified search engine.
because of people like you, google and other search engines will be behind a paywall in the future.
>paying for a filtered and cucked version of llm
>chatGPT for software development
it did what you asked for
>githug
>10k a year to RENT
if there is one institution that deserves a worse torture than israelites it's iccann