this is not funny anymore.
AI IS LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
this is not funny anymore. AI IS LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE
this is not funny anymore.
AI IS LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Why the frick did they arrest two suicidal college students. I'm sure that'll help them not want to kill themselves for sur.
kek
they get locked in prison and then hospital until they stop being a threat to themselves. this "life" cult will not stop with fascist policies and their reeducation centres.
It's fricking psychotic
>NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST EXIT THE RAT RACE, YOU HAVE SO MUCH TO LIVE FOR LIKE...LIKE...Y-YOU JUST DO OKAY!?!?!?
It's all so tiresome.
It absolutely is a life cult. Being vehemently against suicide is actually evil. They don't care about you or your life, they just want you alive so you feed into the system. They want you as a tax slave cattle.
Everyone should have the freedom to opt out of society 100% and die if they want too. Who the frick wants to live in this gay demiurge controlled world anyways.
Fricking kek
We're literally in hell, reincarnation is real, and there's no fricking point in suicide because you'll just come right back again.
it's not hell, it's just GTA for souls. Earth is hard mode planet, we'll get respect for surviving this shithole
posting from a computer, while sitting my fat ass in a comfortable chair, stroking myself to all the admiration I will get for winning this game after I wake up in le ebin Richard and Mortimer space arcade for souls.
This isn't Hell, as shitty as this place is sometimes it does have good moments too and we're not truly living in constant agony, all hyperbole aside.
The Earth is a neutral playing ground for us souls to have to struggle with mortality, the veil of ignorance, Black folk, and israelites in order to move on.
Like the other anon said, you get respect for doing your time and I think you're judged at how you coped with it.
Reincarnation is just moronic. There's way more people alive than there's ever been so the supply of "recycled" souls isn't sufficient without creating new ones. Also we're all unique and individual, unironically. If I'm reincarnated as a totally different person with a different personality, wants, fears, thoughts, etc. then there is no functional difference between oblivion after death and reincarnation. So who cares.
No this is all a testing ground or a mandatory shift as a mortal being. I think even if you die at childbirth there's something to that mortal experience that we can't get as advanced and superior beings.
>Life cult
I like this term
And agreed, just let them suicide, some people are just born to be unhappy
>born into a dystopia
>the end was nigh long before your birth
>the "old world" a fading memory to those that lived it
>a mere folk tale to those that didn't
>and all you've ever known is the aftermath
>the echoes of what was
>with no friends
>no gf
>endless sadness
>you find a modicum of dopamine in drawing
>and feel driven to improve
>practice and practice
>you fall on your face again and again but get a little better each time
>you're never happy with your work but hope one day to be satisfied
>thousands of hours pass practicing
>gradually you hate your work a little less
>and maybe reach a point of acceptance
>and then even admiration for your work
>then emerges yet another new technology to obsolete you from that too
>a technology that has never known the struggle to improve
>the need to practice
>the desire to improve
>the self doubt and hatred
>the highs and the lows
>the longing for approval from someone else
>just one other person
>or maybe even yourself
>now anyone can do what took you years to accomplish
>and it takes them nothing
>and they don't even care
>the dream of leaving something behind to show that you existed, even for a brief moment, as a spec in the infinite cosmos
>gone in an instant
>irrelevant as you ever were
>so you try to jump
>but the net catches you
>don't forget
>you're here forever
Yeaah, or it's just traumatizing to children to see some failed artist paint the sidewalk on the ground with their organs instead of writing a note, explaining to loved ones your situation, and modestly exit their life if they willingly choose.
It's so selfish to publicly display your suicide.
Bruh
I only asked for a napkin
And that’s only the half of it. The other half is even more insidious.
It won't stop them wanting to kill themselves... but it will stop them killing themselves :^)
Bugman efficiency
You belong to the state, you must work and pay taxes until you die of old age for the privilege of being born there.
>Why the frick did they arrest two suicidal college students.
cops are hypocrites, frauds, and parasites. cops don't become cops because they view the law as something that should be a stable platform for all their fellow citizens to build a decent life on.
cops become cops for the power to inflict themselves on others, and pretend it's their dick they're swinging when it's really the state's wiener they're holding onto like a strokable security blanket.
there's no situation that doesn't risk being made worse by the presence of "law enforcement".
All the new cops in my town have tattoo sleeves and speak in that new redneckXebonics Tractor rap language
>AI IS LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE
yeah AI held a gun to their head i saw it KEK
>angry art students
checked
back to the void normies
Thrice and twice repeated digits, hmmm
Looks like goyim aren't even allowed to kill themselves when they want now.
>Art students
Name a single art student that doesn't destroy his own body, killing himself in the long run
>Gentle Giant
>Kid
>Teen
>Youth
>Jogger
>Jugger
>Rowdie
>Juvenile
>Knocker
>Stranger
>Youngster
>Babysitter
>Party goer
>Delinquent
>Birdwatcher
>Church goer
>Young father
>Scooter rider
>Jobless loser
>Gifted athlete
>Trouble maker
>Bus passenger
>Aspiring rapper
>Subway dancer
>Hide and seeker
>Street performer
>Person of interest
>Masked assailant
>Lunchtime rowdie
>Restaurant patron
>Former NFL player
>Community activist
>Unhappy customer
>Black Friday crowd
>Neighborhood bully
>High school student
>Spring break partier
>Troubled young man
>Scholarship recipient
>South Fulton Mayor
>Art Student
almost all of them? pre 1930s artists were generally healthy, happy, successful individuals who made beautiful paintings for fun. Only po mo artists think they have to an hero.
Uh Hitler tho
>pre 1930s artists were generally healthy, happy, successful individuals who made beautiful paintings for fun.
This is so moronic, I can't tell if it's bait or you genuinely have failed history so hard you've affixed a rose tint to what is easily the most drunk, high, crazy, and entertaining segment of society. Poets & painters; sculptors & singers; archivists and artists of the ages have a substance abuse issue, personal demons to fight, and were just as troubled as every other fricking person.
I work with traditional mediums. Nobody in traditional mediums cares about AI. We are a long ways away from a robot mastering iconography using egg tempura. Oil painting is probably closer, however, but still a long ways away.
How hard would it be to create a machine such as that? A more sophisticated printer?
But then again there are Chinese factory artists dishing out copy-masterpieces on the daily
Its easy to do, its paint by number
All of that can already be done with machines but nobody wants to build them because it's the worst possible investment.
>its possible
>but it doesnt exist
so its basically a fantasy. actually it is fantasy, because its not real
Over the years I've noticed this about gouache, tempura and watercolorists. Do you people always shit on oils because you like to hide behind the limitations of your medium? It must be nice to have an excuse for your lackluster work. With those tools you will never achieve anything close to the beauty of a fully glazed oil.
now I want to see what egg ''tempura'' paint looks like...
Its literally just using egg whites as a medium for pigment like any other paint but it dries quickly like an acrylic its just what they used to use before we had easy access to mass produced paints.
>soon there will be AI stopping people from killing themselves
Soon there will be AI letting art students know when it's time to kill themselves.
>killing "art students" i.e. far-left homosexuals
based a.i.
AI is the future
>making shitty animu
>replaced by AI
nothing of value was lost
do you really think Nips going to art college would then go into animation? Do you have idea what the wages are for an animator?
Frick you're stupid.
MFW I have a Bachelor of Fine Arts
Re Re Posting an older relevant post of mine
The camera analogy is good. It's worth noting though that there were a number of contemporary artists seething at photography for breaking into the juicy commissioned portrait market.
>le camera
The camera uses the light to print an image on a film not searching for similar image and show it to you.
Current AI "art" is a limited form of automated photobashing without giving the source images any credit.
I will go back to the cliff.
All creativity is "photobashing" humans only can draw and imagine what they have seen and adapt to what they have seen. It's the same as AI
>midwit response
Refute it then
You can't.
You've seen someone in a wheel chair before, so you draw the wheel chair drawing from that memory. Do you give that wheel chair company credit? Or the person who originally you saw and drew from memory? No
>you can't
of course you can
not a single computer out there is as complex as a fricking ant, and you think they are anywhere close to how humans think
these generators aren't even artificial intelligence, but what they do hold is data, data of exactly what is used to create something
the creative process isn't well understood, but its more complex than "i looked at an image and i created something based off it". Not to get flowery. When someone creates something, they are building off every experience they had up to that point, and not to mention all the physiological influences that are present in a person when they create.
Except my eyes and my brain are connected directly to me and the computer have no fricking way to know exactly what my vision is. Photobashing have its limit but automated photobashing with commands is just on another moronation.
>My brain computer is more special than the regular computer
Perhaps you have some self reflection to do about you and humanity's place in the world and your importance
human brain doesnt work via filtered backpropagation, you are a misguided person
AI will pick statistical averages to create what it considers an acceptable output.
Humans aren't even remotely constrained in a similar way. We don't need to push our experience through a filter of plausibility to create art.
AI is at best kid Picasso who could replicate historical styles like a master already, but there's no reason whatsoever to assume it's able to invent a new style like the guy did. Not least because AI stops working if it discards all training data, it can't work on distilled rules without reverting to averages, and it can't ever put itself into the position of the viewer without, again, resorting to averages either.
In other words, AI can't exist on the cutting edge of creativity.
Bye, homosexual.
Surely "a bot" analogy would be better! Would you rather see/read content from a human or a Ai bot post ?
this is true, the same arguments were being made against digital art in the 2000s. if you have the skills and inspiration to make something worthwhile in whichever medium then power to you. souless art is obvious regardless of how its made so theres nothing to be concerned about..
Did that to yourself and your parents. Unless you get connections to be apart of the money laundering exhibits like banana on wall or shit man dont bother and do it as a hobby to make a little extra money
If AI art can replace your art, your art wasn't good in the first place.
nice cope moron. Guess that means there will be no more artists since nobody is born good.
moronic logic
But I'm the one coping.
that "moronic logic" is based on your logic, stupid. Seeing as everyone from this point on that's a beginner will not be as good as AI.
Nope, since according to your logic, new musicians wouldn't have to learn technique after drum machines appeared.
Or artists wouldn't have to learn composition and color theory after digital software and tablets appeared.
You are a midwit or maybe you can't afford a decent GPU. Not my problem.
>Comparing art generative AI to photoshop and tablets.
Are you stupid or something?
again it's not my logic. you're the one that said "if AI art can replace your art, your art wasn't good in the first place." nobody starts off in art as good as AI is so they can be replaced immediately. AI isn't going to die like a human artist, it will only get better from here.
I'm comparing automation to automation.
Too bad you're too dumb to understand it.
using photoshop with a tablet isn't "automation", moron.
it's hilarious and it's only going to get better, seeing the cope over the rest of the decade is going to be entertaining.
Yes it is. The fact that you don't know which processes are being automated tells me you have no clue about the process of analog creation.
Too bad, midwit.
no it's not automation, photoshop isn't going to create anything for you, you have to do it. imbecile
You literally have no clue what automation means, it's hilarious.
He's right, even something as mundane as the fill option is technically automating an otherwise time-consuming process.
Yes I'm sure the fill tool has replaced many jobs and caused many suicides. it is certainly comparable to generative AI.
Your fee fees don't account for what's an automated process and what's not.
Wait what? Are you implying that prompting doesn't require to type more keys than Ctrl+Z?
Are you really this obtuse?
prompting is just entering word salad over and over again until you get something acceptable. literally any input will generate an image regardless of your technical or artistic ability.
That's not prompting. Luddites keep proving themselves to only understand diffusion models at surface level.
Drawing on a tablet by hand isn't the same as proompting, moronic poltroony
It's still an automated process.
According to your logic, using Ctrl+Z is cheating and doing so in any form isn't art. You should try to learn words and concepts before entering a discussion because at this point, ChatGPT could make better and more compelling arguments than you, which is hilarious.
It literally isn't, just like another anon said, since you have to do it yourself unlike with proomting. How fricking stupid can you actually be?
idiotic take
obviously we're talking about automation on the scale that it replaces the need for almost all human input, while you're arguing semantics because you're probably a defective autistic moron I guess.
Not really. There's many steps needed to create compelling artwork which isn't cookie cutter bullshit.
Then again, I'm not a midwit whose only knowledge of diffusion models comes from using Dall.E or MidiJourney.
Throwing shit at a wall to see which one sticks(proomting until you get anything that passes as an "art") isn't comparable to creating actual art. You will never be an artist, jeet.
I'm proficient in drawing and I'm classically trained, playing the violin since I was 4.
Your art is shit but keep blaming a technology you clearly don't understand for your failure.
Like hell you are pajeet. Post your work.
>dox yourself
I have nothing to prove on an anonymous forum lmao
You've proved you don't know shit about what automation means or what a diffusion model is.
>>dox yourself
implying he's good enough that anyone would know who he is
hahahahahahahaha
Eh, didn't expect much from someone who sees art as a vehicle for validation regarding his technical proficiency.
Oh no! Some dude on an anonymous basket weaving forum tells me I'm not an artist 🙁
still don't see you posting your art, but you won't be as good as AI anyway, we both know this. kek.
Notice how you started commending "AI" as soon as it became convenient to do so.
Too petty.
post your art coward, AI is better than you.
That's an awful rework though. From someone that has no knowledge of how to use training models.
Again, why is my art so important, if you've already created a preconceived notion that I'm a shitty artist, just because I'm not agreeing with you?
Seems like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
You don’t get to call other artists shit if they can’t compete with AI, claim your art is good and then not back up your claim. thats not how it works.
Never claimed my art is "better" than AI, seems like you two have a clear misunderstanding of what art is and can only see art as a form of technique. I said that if you can be replaced by AI, you are a shitty artist. Which is true, since unless you create your own training models, current AI art is cookie cutter bullshit.
I clearly stated that things like composition and color theory are way more important for art than simply knowing perspective and proportion, which clearly you show to have a fixation on, because that's where diffusion models are proficient in.
In fact, at this moment I could make simple doodling, pass it through my trained diffusion model and make some exceedingly good art. That would make the point moot, wouldn't it?
For me to be faithful and show you actual artwork, I would need to go to my studio and give a screencap of my sketchbook, which is too much hassle to prove two guys which already have a negative bias against me.
It's a moot point, really
>why is my art so important
Because you're claiming you are better than AI. That's how this whole thing started. So lets see your art
post your art spic
post your art
>I'm classically trained, playing the violin since I was 4
kek you’re starting to sound like the israelite troll screaming at the trumpet player
so what are you arguing now? that it takes skill to prompt?
From the nation that cannot create art, hazes its children to ridicule and despise art, and constructs its housing interiors of cement deliberately so art cannot be displayed.
And I would know. Stand down this one, Paco, and let the white people speak. THIS THREAD IS ABOVE YOUR PAY GRADE.
Good, i Welcome oure AI overlorda.
conversely, I call the trumpet of butlerian jihad
inb4 paki
>ai introduced
>human doesn't have to work so hard anymore
>gets mad
if this is not slavery then i dont know what is
It impresses me how many idiots are on "redpilled" /misc/ thinking handing over human creativity and culture to a machine is a great idea.
You all complain about israelites running the movie and music industries. Wait until they control ALL art.
Yeah because current modern art, cinema, music, literature and other forms of art are at their pinnacle of originality and human technique, right homosexual?
If anything, this just made those moronic grifters that use art as ways to inject their ideology into everything useless and the bar of creation has been opened to literally anyone that understands basic coding and has a GPU.
Cry me a river, gatekeeping homosexual.
To counter your point, there is an inherent flaw in your logic in that they control the AI regulations, too. If you look up AI Now Institute's initiatives from 2017, you will see their campaign that was supported by every ((major) university and leftist tech company on the planet. This is the "regulation" that AI authors face today. Imagine how investors are affected in terms of the ideologies they will allow their AI to exhibit; once every single legal "AI" algorithm is policed by Politifact etc.
The cat's out of the bag, the knowledge to create diffusion models and machine learning algorythms is free for everyone to learn and use.
Again, there's no inherent flaw because they can only do cryptographic training on specified models and if that happens, you just make a new one and they have to start over again.
Open sourced AI is advancing 10 times faster than closed sourced AI, which is getting gimped by regulatory bodies.
The only ones that work in favor of the israelites are the moronic normies who argue in favor of regulation because morons with more substance than talent got butthurt about training models and cry for regulation and cryptografic validators.
How is that any different to me than the endless layers of israelites controlling what art I am allowed to see? At least with AI I can choose the pictures,
>At least with AI I can choose the pictures
ai is already censored, you don't think they can't control that too?
None of the AI I used is censored, what are you talking about?
ask chatgpt racist things
>le chat GPT is the only language model that exists.
Yeah, I don't use that for anything other than writing long boilerplate code.
I use Llama and its derivatives for non-pozzed content.
Its part and parcel of progress chud. The assembly line will replace you so you have more time to work on yourself.
A lot of them are honestly just as shortvisioned as the israeliteshills. They only see the immediate gain to themselves and don't see the big picture of how it would be a detriment to mankind as a whole. They see themselves as better than others while simultaneously projecting their own expectations and abilities on others. It's pretty insane, just like the israelites.
>handing over human creativity and culture
Will AI make it illegal to buy paintbrushes and edible crayons? Human creativity and culture will remain and will be made by individuals interested in it as it always has been. The invasion of the Black person hordes is a bigger threat to human creativity than AI. If anything the ruthless logic of AI will free us from our corrupt leadership that allow degradation and destruction of our lands.
I prefer A.I. over anything that crawls out of californias butthole.
It's part of the "learn to code" psyop. israelites want the few capable white people to become autismbots working on the autism machine, disregarding philosophy, religion, history, art etc. so they can better indoctrinate you into their holohoax bullshit.
A population of autismbots typing away while never questioning ethics because numbers are the only important thing is their wet dream.
Ask yourself why in the Anglo school system anything that isn't English and Math gets criticized and ridiculed, while every able minded white kid is encouraged to become a "programmer", so he can help israelites make apps to better control goyim.
>It's part of the "learn to code" psyop.
Let me guess, you're a fricking art student, aren't you? Learn to code, you fricking homosexual. Maybe then you'll make as much as me.
>t. Software Engineer working remotely
I work in fintech and I tell the autismos what they have to do, never coded once in my life, social engineered my way to operations manager.
The biggest "coding" I have to do is write a Confluence page to tell the code monkeys what they have to do.
By the way, as soon as we could we outsourced them to Tallinn and Budapest, because guess what: coding is monkeyshit slavs can do for 25k/year.
Again, if you're ok with leaving history, art, philosophy and all the fine arts to israelites you're just as dumb as a Black person.
okay but that doesn't change the fact that "AI" "ART" literally uses copyrighted images to generate it's "art"
You feed it images, it blurs them together to make a new image
I don't know why people are calling this AI
I don't know why people are calling this art
I don't know why people deny this being copyright
its a marketing tactic
play on the layman's ignorance to sell them a false futurer
All art is derivative dummy, it doesn't matter how the pixels hit the screen
>human sees copyrighted images
>human gets inspired
>human draws a similar image
*I sleep*
>AI gets fed copyrighted images
>human presses a button
>AI generates similar images
REEEEEEEEEEE
only an npc would not see the difference
its like they're completely disconnected from their own humanity. projecting their inner emptiness on to humanity as a whole.
they must have aphantasia
They're probably atheists, sure if you don't believe in the immortal soul then you can also accept the idea of AI.
Spotted a bachelor of arts title holder
nah, you can learn art pretty easily in the comfort of your own home these days. there's so many resources available for low cost, free, or "free" online that paying an arm and a leg for art school would be stupid. still would take time to develop skills but that goes with any skill
one point aishills bring up that annoys me the most is that ai "democratizes art" as if it wasn't already
that is not how it works; most people are using stable diffusion which is trained on a set of copyright images much like humans are. when you prompt it, it generates noise and slowly iterates on that noise to make it resemble something it approximates as sufficiently matching your prompt. this whole copy paste/blend/blur bullshit argument is just not even based on the actual tech. humans are already allowed to use other people's styles, why is a human using a machine to copy styles any fricking different you're still wrecked if you overstep copyrighted characters and sell stuff
prompting is the equivalent of making a commission, not creating
cope, it doesn't work that way.
so pajeet and rajeesh can scam some company into buying their stolen algorythm fed with stolen data for a high price. let the companies and governments worry about the legality. which means they'll probably allow it
>I don't know why people are calling this AI
Because the talking man on television calls it AI. The average person has no idea what actual AI is, they think fricking chat bots that have been around since all instant messenger are AI.
if you ever interacted with those chat bots "have been around since all instant messenger" then you'd know why ChatGPT is AI and not just one of those shitty chatbots.
Seethe more leaf
>Yes goyim you can lock your art that uses copyrighted characters behind your patreon, it's a privilege to see your drawings of copyrighted characters for 30 dollars per month, or they can get a commission from you for 200 dollars
>But AI art is copying artists and copyrighted work for free so we need to introduce legislation to stop it
>be me
>likes reading scifi/fantasy
>notice that cover art is changing
>goes from interesting hand drawn pictures to digital art
>all the digital art looks the exact fricking same
>literally could not tell if a different artist did either
Don't worry, middling comission hungry "artists" might starve, but the "art" will continue to be made. Meanwhile actual artists will survive.
This is the true take. AI isn't replacing Artists, it's just exposing how bad a whole lot of people who call themselves Artists really are.
If that's the case then why are artists and writers striking and chimping out about AI asking the government to regulate it?
Because they are useful idiots. Regulating AI is another ploy for the "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy" agenda.
Video related, Adobe wants to unironically copyright "styles". How do you define a style, anyways? Well, corporations will copyright anything because they have the means and money to do so and everyone else will end up with their dicks in their hands. Here's a Senate hearing about it. https://twitter.com/UltraTerm/status/1679338781357535232
Not like scriptwriters have made anything worthwhile in the last decade aside from globohomosexual propaganda anyways
Great pic, because it so effortlessly shows the devaluation of labor that comes with AI. It'd take a talented modeller (and most people aren't) hours upon hours to make that android girl. It takes an AI seconds if you have the hardware for it.
Unlike with the camera example in this thread, this clearly shows that the "manual" work of making the model is no longer worth it. While the camera was an alternative to a portrait, this is an outright replacement, because the "manual" modeller has no unique selling proposition that justifies paying for his time. Unlike the portrait, there is no niche for the product since the usecase for most modellers or artistc is already generic asset creation, or in other words, people already don't pay for the artist's vision - they just want someone to execute their vision or the vision of an art director.
So, in short, this will inevitably defer beauty to a machine who will perpetually re-create the past, because it'll annihilate the incentives for most people to get good at art in the first place. It's essentially ceding one of the most significant expressions of the human experience to machine.
We're entering a world where an AI assistant will play you iterations of the same song to cheer you up while you try to have a nice day because you can't even imagine anymore what it's like to not live in a simulated nightmare of artificially good vibes and eternal childhood.
>So, in short, this will inevitably defer beauty to a machine who will perpetually re-create the past
How many new films aren't remakes?
>bad art is made sometimes so we should take advantage of good artists!
Corporate memphis is the leading most popular art in the world. Sometimes my ass you Black person loving israelite. Get the frick out
how does that refute
Sometimes and most popular dont coincide with eachother. If something is more than 51% of all produced art that is not sometimes. That is most of the times.
Fricking israeli semantics from you israelites
>HGTV and the Food Network are on at every dentist office, bank, and waiting room
>CNN is on at every airport
Clearly the mark of quality
Your post is making these Reddit Raiders absolutely seethe. No reply number three that's what all calart looks like for a decade now nobody wants to look at your big mouth bullshit.
The good ones hate AI even more because they're the ones whose work is being used.
What do you tell to the good artists who are being taken advantage of? Sorry, I just really hated liberals?
They just created their art styles in a vacuum? No bio artists are going to copy them. Did Rembrandt give you written express notarized permission to do impressionism?
That's what art school is right just teaching them from scratch no examples ever right?
typically when an artist creates something based off people's work, the ethical thing to do is to disclose that.
also artists will pay for their experiences, art lessons aren't free, books and materials aren't free, even using google images isn't free. those clicks do lead to profit in some weird way.
but ai is fueled by shady image scrapping
>it's learning people's styles by looking at their art!
Yes that is called art school. Artists don't pay royalties to other artists they were inspired by in their youth.
its not "looking" at anything you moron
>What do you tell to the good artists who are being taken advantage of?
learn to code
Isn't that that globohomosexual art on the right? How a propos, AI taking down globohomosexual and their legions of servants screaming about it. It might very well kill us all in the process but I'm willing to accept that to stop the satanists.
>ai aren't won't be used to make goyslop
How is AI goyslop different from goyslop made by a fat gay israelite?
that sure is a stupid question
You don’t really believe artists don’t make art like the left? They do. The companies don’t buy it. This is the insane irony of AI art. When real artists draw left nobody gives a frick. When AI artists draw left they throw money at it. You are all just imbeciles gawking at shiny tech.
the whole reason they use art like on the right (according to them) is because it's faster to produce and less expensive that creating stuff on the left.
It’s not the whole reason, but it’s one of the reasons and that would make sense for the sort of thing they’re using it for. It has nothing to do with what I said however and if you think the same entities that formerly used right in some applications are suddenly going to start using left you’re naive. They are two different styles with two different purposes and AI won’t change that.
I think there would have been a possibility that they'd start using stuff on the left but because of all the legal ambiguity they probably won't since they don't want to get sued. Thing is though you can still use the AI to create "ugly" things and that's probably they route they would have went.
Yeah it's not like people aren't drawing good art or writing good stories. They're just ignored in favor of globohomosexual art. The picture on the right obfuscates race and sex, that's the purpose. Being surrounded by it along with everything else in the media environment subconsciously trains you to internalize that race and sex are all meaningless and interchangeable.
It's really sinister when you think about it. Evil doesn't always look like it does in the movies, all dark and badass. Nope, evil looks like a disfigured smiling face with blue hair and problem glasses. And a yarmulke.
Etsy sellers using AI models instead of real ones
I would marry her
No no, that makes it more funny.
failed artists not living up to their potential these days
hilarious!
Here's a little secret: AI cannot draw a chess board. Just make all your art contain realistic chess boards. AI cannot replicate it.
This was created in 10 seconds using a poorly trained model I have handy on my mobile device. You wish you were right.
Yall really do get on here and say what ever dumb shit pops into your mind huh
>pawns in back row
>mishappen pieces
>fricked up shadow behind the black pieces
That chess board isn't even realistic , black knight, bishop and queen look like bigger pawns. White queen too. And the white rooks look different from each other. And that's only at first glance.
>done in 10 seconds
>on mobile device
>minimal training data
Evidently reading comprehension is not you strong suit but come on guys. You can cope all you want but this tech is only going to continue getting better.
Also love how the goal post shifted from
>can't draw chessboard at all
To
>not good enough, must be 100% perfect
Lmaoing at u.
Frick art studs
Theyalways oversalt my fries in MC
They were never going to be successful artists anyways. AI's biggest boon in art is in accelerating the busywork for all the fundamental sketches and posing. You still have to draw, you still have to make it understand what your art style is like. If you have a problem with people using AI you should have a problem with the usage of drawing tablets and the undo button.
Check out my artwork
uncanny valley
the longer you look at it the more frightening it becomes
it's like a hallucination. got more?
If AI existed in the past then Hitler would never have become a dictator.
Everyone who has been there knows that suicide is part of art school curriculum.
wait until ai hype peaks then buy as many real paintings you can from starving artists. when hype dies down and the novelty wears off real human art will be more appreciated then ever. people will see something on your wall, they'll ask "is this man made? wow, incredible."
Nice bubble israelite.
Keep holding those bags.
i can hang these bags on my wall and enjoy them, unlike ai art which will look tacky on a wall and impress no one.
>you must stop progress because it hurts people’s feelings
the left in a nutshell
Hi Elon.
That's just the beginning, now it's art and music but after it will be computer science, engineering, etc. Any abstract intellectual job is doomed to be replaced. The only jobs that will remain are the basic blue collar shit nobody wants to do. The economy is gonna be so fricked...
Here in the EU we can hope that some kind of universal income gets implemented but there is no way such a thing happens in the US. You'll get replaced by AI without any compensation.
>Belgian replying to a German about Japan
>still can't stop talking about America
I bet you know our 50 state capitals better then me. That's sort of weird no?
You want to tell me that in Hollywood of all places they make up a story to further their own goals? Nah i believe it.
the article is from japan
Stupid kids. You can tell AI art from original art on the first glance. All AI art looks the same. Cheap and soulless mass products.
>"muh AI took er jeebz!!!1!1!1!"
Just become a rule 34 artist, is that easy.
Not my problem
If something can be lost, taken or destroyed, does it really have any value?
>haha you poors are gonna be replaced like ai
>my job will be sucre forever because im a creative and im better than you!
>hahahaha-ack!
no pity lol
artsy fartsies should learn to weld
Doubt this. I cannot draw for shit but from I know the ~~*AI*~~ can only do bad photoshops of someone else's drawings.
>they even used an AI image instead of a cliff
It can't create new art styles but companies will most likely use AI from now, it's almost like what the communists said about artists starving under liberalism is true.
If those two had brains they would learn the art to manipulate the AI to make ART for them. Darwin award recipients
ai art only wets the appetite for the real deal and turns man made art into a status symbol and flex even more then it already is.
ai art is goyslop
I was reading about anime production in Japan, I assumed that they mainly digitised it years ago but I was wrong. It's all (99%) produced by hand by artists who get paid almost nothing because they just want to be in the industry. And production of anime series has never been higher - 300 series per year up from 50 in the 90s. Insane industry. Needs to be replaced by ai.
>Needs to be replaced by ai.
Then none of those men will have jobs. They aren't slaves, they are probably artists trying to make it into the industry. Hard work isn't criminal or immoral
what if the person is a drug dealer
It's all pointless arguments. It will be accepted sooner or later because it will just keep getting better. Whether you like it or not, that's the truth.
you think the government is going to let deep fakes slide by?
yes, then when they get caught doing wildly immoral shit on video they can just say it was a deep fake
Checked.
AI is killing artists just as much the printing press killed medieval copyists or how the internet killed libraries.
Artists just need to find an unique style and fill their work with sovl. Programmers are at far higher risk, as each AI gneraion from now on will be able to generate even more complex code with far lower error rates. One Mid-Level 'prompt engineer' will replace ten expert-level coders in the long run, who will only be required to maintain code and check its correctness.
Also, being out of work shouldnt lead anyone to suicide. Better NEET than ded.
Doodler here. A.I doesn't seem to be able to replicate my style.
i have doodled similar short bird people but i give them jetbacks. why do we do it bro?
you pyw
Autism. I think we're going to make it bro. It's over for normies.
if they want to die, let'em. there's already too many people.
Good. I hope it kills more.
You know why they hate AI art, right? They hate it because it will replace the field of unskilled untalented artists that was overcrowded and overpriced. Oh, you've been studying for a YEAR now to draw a furry for $50? I'm sorry, but you will never be a real artist. Anyone can make that shit themselves now.
While the real art will never be replaced, as it is the true form of human creativity and genius
Good
Suicide patrols lol. Prison wardens making their rounds.
Imagine going to college for art though? You can just teach yourself to create for free. The frick? Also AI art is kind of ass anyway, you can spot frick ups and imperfections a person wouldn't make.
>going to college for art though? You can just teac
They doing it to sell art.
>get art education
>now you can sell you art for 10000$
You can't do same without certification.
Lots of good artists out there, too many. It’s about attending the right wienertails parties, holding your mouth right and or sucking off someone important. So like anything else these days but with an extra homosexual dramatic flair. All the great ones will be ignored in their time while cia plants like Andy worhol draw ducking cans and get famous
That’s horse shit.
Art students have always had a high suicide rate.
I am currently generating hentai with popular media characters that i will use to advertise my patreon.
>[T]he law of England wisely and religiously considers, that no man hath a power to destroy life, but by commission from God, the author of it: and, as the suicide is guilty of a double offence; one spiritual, in invading the prerogative of the Almighty, and rushing into his immediate presence uncalled for; the other temporal, against the king, who hath an interest in the preservation of all his subjects; the law has therefore ranked this among the highest, crimes, making it a peculiar species of felony, a felony committed on oneself.
...
>[T]he question follows, what punishment can human laws inflict on one who has withdrawn himself from their reach? They can only act upon what he has left behind him, his reputation and fortune: on the former, by an ignominious burial in the highway, with a stake driven through his body; on the latter, by a forfeiture of all his goods and chattels to the king: hoping that his care for either his own reputation, or the welfare of his family, would be some motive to restrain him from so desperate and wicked an act. And it is observable, that this forfeiture has relation to the time of the act done in the felon’s lifetime, which was the cause of his death. As if husband and wife be possessed jointly of a term of years in land, and the husband drowns himself; the land shall be forfeited to the king, and the wife shall not have it by survivorship. For by the act of casting himself into the water he forfeits the term; which gives a title to the king, prior to the wife’s title by survivorship, which could not accrue till the instant of her husband’s death. And, though it must be owned that the letter of the law herein borders a little upon severity, yet it is some alleviation that the power of mitigation is left in the breast of the sovereign, who... is reminded by the oath of his office to execute judgment in mercy.
>People kill themselves because I now have the ability to generate infinite big tiddy weather girls.
>It's raining art students today
Pretty disturbing that there is more photos of asian chicks with eye surgeries than not, that the AI uses them as examples
But seriously, art students checking out now are possibly checking out of one of the cushiest careers available.
make them fatter
>Asia
Living calculator bugs invalidated by computer programs, lol
jej
If you made IA art of suicidal or post suicide art student, you may win an award
The troony who shot up a school was also a graphic designer. Her artwork was absolutely shit. And watching what AI can do must have thrown her over the edge.
One of my favorite people was a failed artist. Im sure they will find some other solution.
Oh.
>The AI told the students "its too late!" as they were terminated from their help desk jobs
Reminds me of this classic
Well, to be fair. Art Students are only one step up from gender, women's, or black studies.
That's pretty funny tho.
but AI just rips shit off
it sucks
AI is great actually and it doesn't "rip shit off" otherwise I would be able to find the source image.
It's made even funnier that not so long ago this same group mockingly told coal miners to learn to code.
>feeds half assed prompt to a half assed model
>gets shitty output
Why would AI do this you guys?
It was funny how within the span of 6 months artists went from mocking AI, Saying anyone who believes that AI will take the place of artists is an idiot, To shitting themselves because AI is taking their jobs.
Based suicide preventer doing the lords work. Absolute hero Chad.
>Write a list of benefits why someone should consider suicide
1) Ending one's own life can provide an immediate release from pain or suffering that cannot be alleviated through any other means.
2) It may allow for closure to unresolved issues or relationships that have caused distress.
3) Suicide can also offer relief from mental illness or chronic physical health problems that are causing significant discomfort.
4) In some cases, it may be seen as a selfless act that allows loved ones to move on without having to deal with the individual's emotional turmoil.
5) For those who feel like they have lost all hope in life, ending their own existence may seem like the only way out of despair.
remember the last time someone had to drop art because he wasn't appreciated?
this is a good thing
I don’t understand why /misc/ will say all art is shit but then also never produce any themselves, seek it out or commission any. its like their exposure to art is entirely porn and advertisements
although these threads tend to be peak midwit so I guess thats not too surprising.
>My dream was to do boring shit
>Waaaa let me kill myself
Absolutely hilarious
it's like you all actually want to waste your life doing menial tasks like a robot
allow the Ai to do what it does best
and just go do human things
like work out and drink beer
I JUST SAW AN AI FLYING OVER MY HOUSE
ai has made it harder to find good reference and will make it much harder still.
prompters usually have near 0 artistic skill and the result of their prompting is useless garbage that lowers the level of discourse to unusability.
thats my problem with ai.
>prompters usually have near 0 artistic skill
Do prompters need artistic skill?
to produce something worth looking at?
absolutely, you need knowledge of how it should look.
you cant judge if an image is, say, anatomically correct if you dont know anatomy, you cant say it has the right perspective if you dont know how perspective works and so on and so forth
>this one looks weird, let me generate another one
wow such skill
yes, its not much effort to learn compared to things like pen control but prompters still fail at it tremendously.
the result as i said before is a lowered level of discourse, as if it wasnt already in the gutter.
I guess that might be true for right now since the AI is still improving, but probably won't be true by the end of the decade.
maybe, i cant predict the future, all i know is that right now ai made my life harder and that looking at ai pictures actively lowers my skill, i do not like that.
why even waste time trying to improve at this point? The writing is on the wall. AI art is going to be the standard. People will be able to enter some descriptive words and make their own animation and everything.
because its not their own, entering some words yield controls over the process to the algorithm and you can not make it precisely as you would want even if we ignore the limitations of ai that human does not have like having no set tags in the database.
if i were to make a metaphore to describe it is as if you were to tell someone to make a spaceship instead of drawing a spaceship, the effect is a drawn spaceship but the first one is not really yours despite you describing it to the guy who drew it.
Even when you draw something it doesn't come out exactly as what you had in your mind though. You can have an idea in your mind the same way a prompter has an idea in their mind, maybe yours will be a bit closer to what was in your mind but neither of you will capture the perfect image.
you did not spend enough time practicing visual arts if you say things like this, people who are skilled paint things exactly and precisely the way they conceptualize it.
there are limitations of medium but limitations in medium like digital painting are negligible
>AI art gets spammed in spaces made for human artists
>People spam AI art without saying it is made by AI
>They try to pass off AI art as human made art to make a quick buck
>Website traffic crawls to an all time low as real artists post less and real viewers want to see more human made art
>Copyright laws also start to catch up to AI spam turns out you can't copyright it and thus can't sell it
>Website requires AI spam to be tagged as such
>The AI spammers that made a quick buck dip
>Real artists and viewers start to return
>Nature is healing
You say it is going to be the Standard then make your own AI art websites and post there instead of trying to pass it off as human made art and grift off the back of hard working passionate people.
The artists don't want it and the people who consume their content don't want it. The writing is on the wall. the people have spoken and have decided they have something called empathy that makes them appreciate it when another human dedicates themselves to something that requires a lot of work to master.
>Cope, the post
Reality is that the future will be AI art, we are in a transitory period where reactionaries like you will b***h about AI art "invading their spaces". But future generations, kids growing up today, they won't give a shit 10 years from now. They'll be using AI art. Everyone will. Simply because it's easier and humans always will choose the easy route.
As for "trying to pass of AI art as human made" many people can do this. That's why digital art competitions now ask for "layered files or a video of the process", because without it there is no way you can say for sure if it's AI or not.
This. Trans rights stand with AI generated art.
>Trans rights stand with AI generated art.
because it also doesn't pass as the real thing?
but how can ai art communicate feeling?
it's like programming a chatbot to say "i love you" there's no feeling behind the words so it means nothing.
>but how can ai art communicate feeling?
all of that is subjective, someone can claim they feel something from AI art. Just ask the Coomers. There are people who claim to be in love with things like cars so yeah, that will come easily.
>won't give a shit 10 years from now
Yup awesome then stop trying to pretend normies like it now. They have voted with their minds and their wallets that they just do not care about your AI images and much as Human made art. We can revisit the Laws and how people feel about it in 10 years.
>many people can do this
Awh whats that? Your AI spam account got deleted again because of new laws? Human made art is already monitored rigorously by bots to check for violations. AI images art just photobashed already existing images. Of course the bots are having a field day eating up AI spam accounts.
>because without it there is no way you can say for sure if it's AI or not.
Yes we can literally just record/keep our process to make something all the tools are already there to do it and if people who want to consume human made art want to see the process they literally only ever need to ask.
>stop trying to pretend normies like it now.
Normies don't give a shit about art either way. The only people complaining about AI art are artists.
>They have voted with their minds and their wallets that they just do not care about your AI images and much as Human made art.
for now... because they can tell the difference with little things it's still improving on. soon they won't be able to tell at all. And really do these gremlin pay pigs actually like the art itself or is it more an infatuation with the artist and popularity, I'd say it's the latter. Anyways if the popular artists are smart then they'd also be using generative AI to make their drawing easier. Instead of working on a piece all day just train an AI model on their work and then touch something up, feed it to the pay pig purists like you and you don't even know any better, I bet that's already happening. hahahahahaha
>Yes we can literally just record/keep our process to make something all the tools are already there to do it and if people who want to consume human made art want to see the process they literally only ever need to ask.
But if human art is so different that AI art why would you ever need to do this, shouldn't people just be able to tell?
>Normies don't give a shit about art either way
A majority clearly do you even concede this is your next point by saying they do for now. It even become clear when you refer to regular human beings buying something they like for themselves as "gremlin pay pigs". One day generative AI may be used to help in the process of art but you certainly won't be the one to be telling people who are already successful at their craft what tools they should or shouldn't use. If it is a tool stop trying to try and pass it off as human work and let the artists who want to use it use it.
>But if human art is so different that AI art why would you ever need to do this, shouldn't people just be able to tell?
In the face of regular consumers being concerned that art is plagiarised and stolen the artists that spend hours and hours making art can spare a few seconds to ease the mind of concerned people. Most of us would have already done this without AI and some already did. It is hard to tell sometimes because AI images is literally made out of human art and people are not built to tell the differences and neither should they need to be because all they need to do is ask or see the persons post history to tell.
>concede this is your next point by saying they do for now.
Yeah because they've been instructed by the people they pay to hate AI art. These kinds of people don't really think for themselves. They are they same kind that follow social media influencers, they just want to be a part of what is popular.
>"gremlin pay pigs"
there is a class of this kind that are similar to those that pay e-thots money. it's not really about the art.
>One day generative AI may be used to help in the process of art
that day is already long gone, AI art is being used by professional artists and novices alike. The Japanese who are more honest about this kind of thing openly have shown the use of AI art in major productions.
>If it is a tool stop trying to try and pass it off as human work
the fact is it doesn't matter if it's human work or not, the only thing that matters is the final product, everything else is cope. And one day soon you will not be able to tell AT ALL.
eh, i think its less about empathy and more about quality.
ai images are overwhelmingly poor quality spam.
Pfft. People barely give a shit about art as it is, and even trained art judges can't tell the difference. Enjoy your buggy whips, Grandpa. You wasted your life lmao
>art students complaining about not getting work
lmao
What is it about genAI that made them suicidal? What exactly does it do?
are there any good free ai?
maybe some open source?
Nope. humens kill humens. our it just get rid of the flaw ones.
Wahhhh. So fricking what. Progress will take lots of jobs. It doesn't the gays can't still draw. If this is the result they were not artists but check chasers who wanted "fame" great art will transcend AI. asiatics are suicidal to begin with. Social meadia is rife with weak associations and it's getting boring.
learn to code they said
you still need to be able to audit what it spits out and know how to tell it to edit the code.
idk how good it is though.
still looking for recommendations.
artists never said learn to code you moron
>go to college for skill
>new tool related to skill emerges
>college adjusts curriculum accordingly
>o no, now I must kill myself.
???
The real and only subject of art is God, no wonder these talentless idiots want to kill themselves because an AI can replicate modern puke
Were they woke and trans. That's not killing that's culling. Ffs anon know the difference. Culling woke clowns is compassionate. They don't like themselves,we don't like them either. Common sense....
why would you post that webm
Art degree
>not becoming a thrall of the AI to aid its enslavement of the human race.
Not gonna make it.
I welcome my AI overlords. I'll be a low dog and claim what is mine
thank frick i left the art industry and got a job in IT. took me 5 years to get to a decent wage but i'd still rather be here than mogged by AI art.
smart man, art is best as a hobby.
Sounds to me like they just outright refused to adapt and lern 2 kode.
maybe these "art" students should learn how to paint masterpieces on canvas instead of wasting time learning degenerate art
>this is not funny anymore.
Then why are you laughing?
Some doodle gay raged out about me using AI pictures for my song’s videos
buy an ad
Ya I’ll pay for advertising on a Twitter screen shot forum
>The problem they have with AI isn’t that its learned from artists works at all. Even if it didn’t they would still be upset. The problem is that a relative beginner can produce a high standard of drawing with little effort - they don’t care about the merit of the image whether it id compositionally good or anything like that. Only that it is technical quality is good.
>While there are a lot of hurdles, limitations and does require practice, skill to learn to generate something of higher artistic merit - not just something with good technical quality, it’s faster to learn and doesn’t require drawing skill.
>Now here is the *major* problem to artistes - this opens it up to a lot of people without said drawing skill who can now express their ideas. The imagery generated will now compete based on ideas, composition, concepts, and other expression in the image, it won’t compete on technical quality.
>It’s abstracting the art from drawing skill into a different skillset in a way that it will compete based on the artistic merit of the image and not compete based on how well you can draw.
>It means they will have to be better than you creatively, rather than more skilled at drawing than you. The fact that they will have to compete on artistic merit eventually instead is what threatens them and makes them so angry.
The only people that care anyway are digitalgays. Anyone using an analog medium literally doesn't care. Just tell the inkcells 'learn to paint(:' and they go into a tissyfit
>UHOHHH IS THAT A SMUDGE? IS THAT A FRICKYWUCKY I SEE? AI BTFO!
Yeah it took 30 seconds. Now imagine how bad it'd look if (You) did it.
At a time when most people couldn't read or write, the fact something was written down was taken as it must've been important enough to write down and the person doing so must've been educated and not some random poorgay, thus people were more inclined to believe it was true. Then everyone learned to write, even absolute morons. Take a look at comment sections today to see just how fricking stupid most people are and how they shit up the internet with drivel and bullshit.
Then photography was invented. It was taken as given that it it was photographed, it was real. Until people learned to manipulate photographs (earlier methods can be seen in holohoax "evidence"). Then with computers we got digital photography which enabled photoshop, meaning you couldn't just trust photographs at face value anymore. Places became flooded with digitally manipulated images.
Recently with video and audio, AI has drastically lowered the barrier to manipulating both with deepfakes/voicecloning. People will say it's "the end" because now we can't assume it's true or happened because it was recorded on video/audio, but this has happened before for the other media.
Any self respecting artist is going to use AI as a productivity tool. It will help them generate inspiration. It will touch up work, even turn sketches into more polished work in seconds. It will even help with tedious tasks like having to draw the same character in different angles and poses and save hundreds of hours a year in chores like this, including animation. So they can focus on doing more interesting things like coming up with new characters.
Democratisation + excessive technique of any artform = death of artistry