This guy claims that he will release a program by the end of the year that beats all current top chess engines using nothing but GPT-4 prompting. He even wrote a long-ass LARP thread about it.
https://twitter.com/kenshin9000_/status/1734238211088506967
buy an ad
Which three letter agency do you work for?
llms will never reach agi levels. now frick off back to /r/singularity you schizobabbling dimwit
>a program that can write and execute code will never be sufficiently advanced
LLM's are literally just bad compilers, where literally every line of code is UB.
>Which three letter agency do you work for?
>llms are agi
uh oh, brainlets, stinky 90 iq, yikes
Who let the schizos out?
i actually wonder
given they're trained on text prediction, can llms ever surpass the quality of the dataset they're trained from? my guess is no
sure, by randomly predicting a set of words they might be able to infer stuff they weren't trained on, but for them to actually figure out stuff that wouldn't easily be figured out by the best minds in the world they would have to provide higher quality output than the input
>they would have to provide higher quality output than the input
It is possible, but the synthetic data training process requires that you train the model weights which obviously this guy doesn't have access to. Those are some big claims he's making. Kenshin is either a prompt engineering god or a schizo
https://streamable.com/bcl8a5
>using nothing but GPT-4 prompting.
>twitter nobody
TWO MORE WEEKS!
TRUST THE PLAN!
It can do things with a prompt that it doesn't have to have learned about. Like I could ask it, "My name is Bob. What is my name?" and it takes the information in the prompt into account when it predicts its response. If you could prompt it with some novel concepts, explained in English, and have it apply those concepts in its response... it could probably do something surprisingly good but it would be prone to a lot of mistakes. For example, it can easily apply a concept opposite
I read post 5/5 and this guy is fricking insane. He's way over his head.
these are the same failures that lost a fortune in shitcoins and thought nft would work. high level functioning geniuses. ai is the new grift, except they can't figure out how to make any money out of it because all of these homosexuals are computer illiterate.
Well I think this is more an internet situation than a Bitcoin situation (and Bitcoin does have some use primarily as a black market trading medium) what I mean is more that it is impossible to say what will happen post-Singularity and a lot of the specific things he mentioned do seem fairly impossible to me - you need to run scientific experiments to push the boundaries of physics, and that will take time to execute.
>mpossible to say what will happen post-Singularity
won't happen unless quantum computers get good, and even then the way things are going, we as a society have already handed over the ai reigns to corporations. now governments are getting involved. unless we can create and control our own ai training solutions/datasets we're all in a world of trouble.
Quantum computers ARE getting good and we CAN create our own AI training solutions and datasets synthetically
I think that companies and governments will try to bring about the Singularity due to its potential for ensuring literally everlasting national dominance
>think that companies and governments will try to bring about the Singularity due to its potential for ensuring literally everlasting national dominance
won't happen any time soon.
we do need quantum computers because frick waiting thousands of years for a calculation when it can be done in seconds, milliseconds and possibly instantaneously.
Honestly some part of me wants to say that Quantum Computing is just one massive scam, mostly because it's produced nothing of value, but I mean I don't know shit about it and many learned individuals appear to believe that future developments can bring about useful applications
nah it's no scam at all. it's a very exiting and complicated reality that exists now and is only going to get crazier as decades progress. these things will eventually unlock a few mysteries for us in record times, making today's super computers look like a Jacquard machine
Yeah, but I've heard an argument that to actually get quantum computers to do what they're promised to do you'd need to be able to measure the output continuously, and you'd be able to do the same thing if you had an infinite continuously measurable protractor, for instance. Also it's worth pointing out the pathetic results quantum computers have so far produced, with the biggest number actually factored by Shor's Algorithm being 21.
we're at tech level of a steam engine when it comes to them. it's going to be many decades until they evolve and they'll still probably be stuck in labs/research.
More like an aeolipile. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile
It remains to be seen whether there are a lot of useful quantum algorithms out there or just a handful of notional ones.
You don't need quantum computers for anything. Reality is deterministic.
>Reality is deterministic
No, it's not.
I knew you were going to say that.
Quantum and conventional computers are just as powerful in terms of what algorithms they can run, Chud. The only change is computational complexity (and iirc only theoretically).
>and Bitcoin does have some use primarily as a black market trading medium
ACTUAL criminals are using monero the worlds first and only cocaine backed currency. It's over for maxis
This homosexual is gonna miss ANOTHER bull run. Point and laugh
BUY THE DIP!
AGI = obese homosexual sci-fi apocalyptic fanfic
AGI has already been achieved.
>AGI has already been achieved.
True, and many gamers preferred it over SCI.
heh
Schizo confirmed.
go to fricking /lmg/ you stupid homosexuals that aren't feds, we're running 70b level models at 13-30b requirements thanks to mixtral, a brand new development that just came out
we may actually be close to """AN AGI""", obviously not the media sensationalist "world ending" shit but something incredibly tough for ((them)) to control.
frick why do i even bother it's not like real people with brains read this shit anymore
goalposts will be moved yet again since no one can even define AGI anymore
I just want it to replace the jobs of the people I went to high school with. If it's called agi by then I don't care.
>Yeah if I just do N-shot until I get the right answer then GPT4 gets 100% correct. This applies to ALL text benchmarks.
Is this necessarily a bad thing? If an LLM can reflect on its own choices, then it can do a lot of tasks well
It would be the user reflecting on the choices in that case, not the LLM.
If you prompt hard enough, anything is possible. Anything at all. so GPT-1 is already an AGI