This guy claims that he will release a program by the end of the year that beats all current top chess engines using nothing but GPT-4 prompting.

This guy claims that he will release a program by the end of the year that beats all current top chess engines using nothing but GPT-4 prompting. He even wrote a long-ass LARP thread about it.

https://twitter.com/kenshin9000_/status/1734238211088506967

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    buy an ad

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >llms are agi
      uh oh, brainlets, stinky 90 iq, yikes

      Which three letter agency do you work for?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        llms will never reach agi levels. now frick off back to /r/singularity you schizobabbling dimwit

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >a program that can write and execute code will never be sufficiently advanced

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            LLM's are literally just bad compilers, where literally every line of code is UB.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Which three letter agency do you work for?

  2. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >llms are agi
    uh oh, brainlets, stinky 90 iq, yikes

  3. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who let the schizos out?

  4. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    i actually wonder
    given they're trained on text prediction, can llms ever surpass the quality of the dataset they're trained from? my guess is no
    sure, by randomly predicting a set of words they might be able to infer stuff they weren't trained on, but for them to actually figure out stuff that wouldn't easily be figured out by the best minds in the world they would have to provide higher quality output than the input

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >they would have to provide higher quality output than the input
      It is possible, but the synthetic data training process requires that you train the model weights which obviously this guy doesn't have access to. Those are some big claims he's making. Kenshin is either a prompt engineering god or a schizo

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://streamable.com/bcl8a5

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Which three letter agency do you work for?

      >using nothing but GPT-4 prompting.
      >twitter nobody
      TWO MORE WEEKS!
      TRUST THE PLAN!

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      It can do things with a prompt that it doesn't have to have learned about. Like I could ask it, "My name is Bob. What is my name?" and it takes the information in the prompt into account when it predicts its response. If you could prompt it with some novel concepts, explained in English, and have it apply those concepts in its response... it could probably do something surprisingly good but it would be prone to a lot of mistakes. For example, it can easily apply a concept opposite

  5. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I read post 5/5 and this guy is fricking insane. He's way over his head.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      these are the same failures that lost a fortune in shitcoins and thought nft would work. high level functioning geniuses. ai is the new grift, except they can't figure out how to make any money out of it because all of these homosexuals are computer illiterate.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well I think this is more an internet situation than a Bitcoin situation (and Bitcoin does have some use primarily as a black market trading medium) what I mean is more that it is impossible to say what will happen post-Singularity and a lot of the specific things he mentioned do seem fairly impossible to me - you need to run scientific experiments to push the boundaries of physics, and that will take time to execute.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >mpossible to say what will happen post-Singularity
          won't happen unless quantum computers get good, and even then the way things are going, we as a society have already handed over the ai reigns to corporations. now governments are getting involved. unless we can create and control our own ai training solutions/datasets we're all in a world of trouble.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Quantum computers ARE getting good and we CAN create our own AI training solutions and datasets synthetically

            I think that companies and governments will try to bring about the Singularity due to its potential for ensuring literally everlasting national dominance

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >think that companies and governments will try to bring about the Singularity due to its potential for ensuring literally everlasting national dominance
              won't happen any time soon.

              You don't need quantum computers for anything. Reality is deterministic.

              we do need quantum computers because frick waiting thousands of years for a calculation when it can be done in seconds, milliseconds and possibly instantaneously.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Honestly some part of me wants to say that Quantum Computing is just one massive scam, mostly because it's produced nothing of value, but I mean I don't know shit about it and many learned individuals appear to believe that future developments can bring about useful applications

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                nah it's no scam at all. it's a very exiting and complicated reality that exists now and is only going to get crazier as decades progress. these things will eventually unlock a few mysteries for us in record times, making today's super computers look like a Jacquard machine

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, but I've heard an argument that to actually get quantum computers to do what they're promised to do you'd need to be able to measure the output continuously, and you'd be able to do the same thing if you had an infinite continuously measurable protractor, for instance. Also it's worth pointing out the pathetic results quantum computers have so far produced, with the biggest number actually factored by Shor's Algorithm being 21.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                we're at tech level of a steam engine when it comes to them. it's going to be many decades until they evolve and they'll still probably be stuck in labs/research.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                More like an aeolipile. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                It remains to be seen whether there are a lot of useful quantum algorithms out there or just a handful of notional ones.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            You don't need quantum computers for anything. Reality is deterministic.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Reality is deterministic
              No, it's not.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I knew you were going to say that.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Quantum and conventional computers are just as powerful in terms of what algorithms they can run, Chud. The only change is computational complexity (and iirc only theoretically).

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >and Bitcoin does have some use primarily as a black market trading medium
          ACTUAL criminals are using monero the worlds first and only cocaine backed currency. It's over for maxis

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        This homosexual is gonna miss ANOTHER bull run. Point and laugh

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          BUY THE DIP!

  6. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AGI = obese homosexual sci-fi apocalyptic fanfic

  7. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  8. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AGI has already been achieved.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AGI has already been achieved.
      True, and many gamers preferred it over SCI.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        heh

  9. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Schizo confirmed.

  10. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    go to fricking /lmg/ you stupid homosexuals that aren't feds, we're running 70b level models at 13-30b requirements thanks to mixtral, a brand new development that just came out
    we may actually be close to """AN AGI""", obviously not the media sensationalist "world ending" shit but something incredibly tough for ((them)) to control.
    frick why do i even bother it's not like real people with brains read this shit anymore

  11. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    goalposts will be moved yet again since no one can even define AGI anymore

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      I just want it to replace the jobs of the people I went to high school with. If it's called agi by then I don't care.

  12. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Yeah if I just do N-shot until I get the right answer then GPT4 gets 100% correct. This applies to ALL text benchmarks.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is this necessarily a bad thing? If an LLM can reflect on its own choices, then it can do a lot of tasks well

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        It would be the user reflecting on the choices in that case, not the LLM.

  13. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you prompt hard enough, anything is possible. Anything at all. so GPT-1 is already an AGI

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *