generative imagery uses many existing images and formulates an output based on your input. it seems unique, but it is made up of many parts of other imagery. if the result sucks the input data is weak and likely not torrented from the internet.
here is an attempt: artificial intelligence is the broad term for multi-threaded or simultaneous functions that use trained, labeled data that takes inputs to produce an output based on probability.
It's all shit too, ChatGPT used to be able to bring up lines of code from opensource git repositories if you asked "what do I need to change to make this xxx?"
Now it just says it doesnt have access to it anymore. This is among other awful things like getting answers wrong etc...
Artificial means FAKE you fricking moron, it's already fake, you don't need to say "there's no such thing" or "it's not intelligent", it's in the fricking name that it's an attempt to emulate intelligence, a fake, a phony, a fraud, and that includes being a very shitty emulation too, if you like. So don't say "there's no such thing", just say "it's bad."
Because it's obviously on a trajectory of improvement you STUPID FRICK.
true, artificial is fake in physical terms. artificial intelligence is a bad comparison to the physical realm. it is artificial in relation to digital media/data. >was digital ever physical to begin with?
Nooo stop calling my weird math box with lines and squiggles in it unintelligent I spent 40 extra grand getting my masters degree and published a worthless paper noooo
those two terms have the same semantic meaning
machine learning is just artificial intelligence with a thesaurus
Not exactly. AI is behavioral outcome while ML is a mechanism.
More like AI is just machine learning with a Theranos
kek
I think I have shill fatigue, because it gets harder and harder to laugh at this stuff.
>semantics
>frog poster
>those two terms have the same semantic meaning
when it suits you
If statements with extra steps
frogman, you look tired. that and this need organized data.
>what can you not do with data?
then why is it capable of accurately describing a random image I provide it with? A brand new image its never seen before in its training data?
>then why is it capable of accurately describing a random image I provide it with? A brand new image its never seen before in its training data?
Literally machine learning 101
generative imagery uses many existing images and formulates an output based on your input. it seems unique, but it is made up of many parts of other imagery. if the result sucks the input data is weak and likely not torrented from the internet.
error: likely torrented from the internet.
generative ai works like torrents, legal or not.
There's no such thing as intelligence, it's all just runaway communications modules and pattern nooticing/matching.
>Zoomers are now mystified by games of 20 questions
>OP is a moron and thinks AI and AGI are the same
Lmao
Define Artificial Intelligence.
here is an attempt: artificial intelligence is the broad term for multi-threaded or simultaneous functions that use trained, labeled data that takes inputs to produce an output based on probability.
Artificial Intelligence is a monoid in the category of Machine Learning techniques
It's called """artificial"" intelligence for a reason.
It's all shit too, ChatGPT used to be able to bring up lines of code from opensource git repositories if you asked "what do I need to change to make this xxx?"
Now it just says it doesnt have access to it anymore. This is among other awful things like getting answers wrong etc...
Artificial means FAKE you fricking moron, it's already fake, you don't need to say "there's no such thing" or "it's not intelligent", it's in the fricking name that it's an attempt to emulate intelligence, a fake, a phony, a fraud, and that includes being a very shitty emulation too, if you like. So don't say "there's no such thing", just say "it's bad."
Because it's obviously on a trajectory of improvement you STUPID FRICK.
true, artificial is fake in physical terms. artificial intelligence is a bad comparison to the physical realm. it is artificial in relation to digital media/data.
>was digital ever physical to begin with?
>if BOT can't reason AI, how can the world?
Artificial intelligence is any program that can mimic or automate human actions, be it an if else program or a a machine learning model.
i like making sequential functions act as humans. math, time, and data win again; it does all those keyboard things like humans.
There's no such thing as Human Intelligence either. It's all just advanced ape learning.
>what is your wpm?
With my flagship model (ESL-4chin-2microneurons) and contextsize of 3 chained posts : about 10wpm.
Nooo stop calling my weird math box with lines and squiggles in it unintelligent I spent 40 extra grand getting my masters degree and published a worthless paper noooo
intelligence is demonstrated through action, not by definition