Theoretically… Could AI do a pretty decent job at predicting which number would hit next on an electronic roulette wheel?
Is ChatGPT capable of doing something like that?
Theoretically… Could AI do a pretty decent job at predicting which number would hit next on an electronic roulette wheel?
Is ChatGPT capable of doing something like that?
Only if they had the source code of that particular machine.
There's a real roulette wheel in those things... is it not totally random?
It is supposed to be but each wheel has more or less variance due to physical abnormalities
This has been exploited in the past
Realistically, it is effectively random and OP has a gambling addiction
It’s true I do have a gambling addiction. But also the wheels do have some sort of bias to them.
But not so much that you won't be left broken again
These machines are perfect for exploitation because they use real wheels, but the spin and the ball release are always the same. After a while you start to see that there might be some sort of pattern.
Thats folks, is your brain on addiction.
>After a while you start to see that there might be some sort of pattern.
Sure, if you have the data of a billion rounds from the same wheel you might improve your chances by half a percent.
just use the current state of the universe as input and simulate the output
Dumbest thread on BOT
yeah, free tier chatgpt will allow you to build an infinite money machine
ChatGPT regurgitates what it's seen on the internet. If enough people typed 2+2 = 5, it would answer that if you asked what 2+2 equals. It doesn't think, it doesn't know. For it to predict this, it would need to have a statistically significant part of the internet openly telling you how to game these machines.
happened. MIT group, led by a lecturer
i think they got .. i recall reading it - they got something like 200k outta it
ws a lot simpler than 'generative ai' ..
they used a processor and an observer. the observer was behind the player, observing the wheel. based on simple statistical prediction of the balance of the wheel, based on the results. .. they had tuned their software using a wheel at home. he would pocket click to transmit to a receiving station strapped to the leg of the gambler, to indicate the most probable #
it is possible. its all described in
Bringing Down the House: The Inside Story of Six M.I.T. Students Who Took Vegas for Millions
book
another one for BOT tech book recommend
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Blackjack_Team
got it wrong
another system. that book = blackjack
but
Roulette-wheel predictor
MIThril, a borglab production. Richard W. DeVaul, Jonathan Gips, Michael Sung, Sandy Pentland
A device to predict where the roulette ball will land, increasing the bettor's odds. Augments the predictive powers of the bettor.
The system was a cigarette-pack sized analog computer with 4 push buttons. A data-taker would use the buttons to indicate the speed of the roulette wheel, and the computer would then send tones via radio to a bettor's hearing aid. The system was invented in 1961. It and its successors were the first to produce better than even odds on a gambling game.
mit did have a system for roulette and i think it is in that book
its a whole book about the roulette attempt
The Ritz team wasn’t the first. In 2001, a Hungarian, Laszlo Kovaks, was caught doing the same thing in the Star City Casino in Australia. And as far back as 1961, the same Edward O. Thorp of blackjack fame invented what was probably the first wearable computer. After a lot of research, he was able to predict the fall of the ball to one-eighth of the wheel. Another group of MIT students followed in his footsteps in 1976 and took the project a step further, but never capitalized on it. That was 45 years ago. With today’s technology and computing power, the hurdles that the early pioneers faced just aren’t there anymore.
wrong paste. outta here
Edward O. Thorp studied mathematics and physics at UCLA and has applied his mathematical and scientific know-how in novel ways during his career. In the 1960s while teaching at MIT, he invented the first wearable computer as a device to predict the outcome of roulette rounds. Thorp later proved players could beat the house in blackjack by counting cards and wrote the bestselling Beat the Dealer about his findings. In 1969, Thorp created the first market-neutral hedge fund, lending his profound understanding of math to the field of investing. Thorp is an alumnus of the 1949 STS and a member of the Society’s Honorary Board.
it was MIT. there were different attempts
Edward O. Thorp studied mathematics and physics at UCLA and has applied his mathematical and scientific know-how in novel ways during his career. In the 1960s while teaching at MIT, he invented the first wearable computer as a device to predict the outcome of roulette rounds. Thorp later proved players could beat the house in blackjack by counting cards and wrote the bestselling Beat the Dealer about his findings. In 1969, Thorp created the first market-neutral hedge fund, lending his profound understanding of math to the field of investing. Thorp is an alumnus of the 1949 STS and a member of the Society’s Honorary Board.
the story of that ^ is in a book. its a very good read
>Could AI?
Yeah sure, but it would be overkill you don't really need an AI you just need to understand how the ball moves and write something that handles that:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/05/23/how-physicists-used-science-to-beat-the-odds-at-roulette/?sh=34b09a473c39
>Could ChatGPT?
No, and you sound like you're either 15 or a complete retard.
i read that generative ai has been used to make successful but weird 'knitting patterns' it has that level of depth
>Is ChatGPT capable of doing something like that?
You don't understand random, nor chatgpt.
My advice is to not gamble.
Also Don't work, so you can't have money to gamble.
No Pussy No work, No pussy No Taxes, No Pussy No Peace.
It'd be easier to use one of those mini emps on the slots. I wouldn't do any of that though because the risk of just getting tied to a chair and getting beat up is enough to deter me.
theoretically? theoretically.
Heh. It’s not a gamble if I know I can win. See you guys on the flip siiiiiide.