Stop calling it artificial intelligence. It's not intelligent at all and gives people a false idea of what it is. It's nothing more than a programmed bot. Those new AI voices? They function the same as Microsoft Sam, they sound better but they're still basically Microsoft Sam. But nobody called Microsoft Sam AI back in the day. It will never replace real human voices because this program cannot inflect like a human that is consciously aware of what it's reading.
What is actually going on under the hood of stuff like Stable Diffusion? It's like a brute force password hack. The program tries many different ways to output something until it vaguely resembles what the programmer instructed it to output. There is no thought process in the output like there would be with a real human. We wouldn't consider a brute force hack "intelligent", so why shouldn't we do the same here?
It will never be self-aware either. That is pure science fiction fantasy. Scientists still haven't the first clue how human consciousness works, how can anyone expect it to be replicated in a machine? For all we know true artificial intelligence is ontologically impossible. At best it's a program like any other on your computer or phone right now that simply does what it's instructed to do by its human programmer.
If you believe artificial intelligence can exist, then you must also believe in intelligent human design. It is fantasy.
If it was intelligent it would be called intelligence. Artificial intelligence is called that because it is artificial. A fucking abacus is a kind of artificial intelligence. A.I. is a tool to augment intelligence.
And anyway, it’s too late for the word to leave daily use. At least it’s not as bad as “smartphone.” Get over it.
The word intelligence is still there.
Nobody thinks faux leather is leather even if the word leather “is still there.” Artificial intelligence is a misleading but not inaccurate phrase.
Completely different. Fake leather is functionally, practically, leather even if it isn't. Artificial intelligence is not functionally intelligent.
the biggest gayry with artificial "intelligence" is that no one know what "intelligence" or "consciousness" are. shit may just be out of grasp for human limited cognition. for all I know all I got to access this current universe is an interface provided by my brain.
until "intelligence" or "conciousness" can be defined, which is probably never, "artificial intelligence" is nothing but a hype buzzword to sell shit to VCs.
it's called artificial intelligence because a family of topics related to general approaches and algorithms that accrue a representation of inference and are able to accomplish a complex task involving pattern recognition. It's an apt name because it's about creating systems that can solve general classes of patterned problems rather than solving each problem specifically.
>What is actually going on under the hood of stuff like Stable Diffusion? It's like a brute force password hack. The program tries many different ways to output something until it vaguely resembles what the programmer instructed it to output. There is no thought process in the output like there would be with a real human. We wouldn't consider a brute force hack "intelligent", so why shouldn't we do the same here?
This isn't true though. It's literally denoising examples using Markov chains
Artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible for machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and perform human-like tasks. Most AI examples that you hear about today – from chess-playing computers to self-driving cars – rely heavily on deep learning and natural language processing.
>Stop calling it artificial intelligence. It's not intelligent at all and gives people a false idea of what it is. It's nothing more than a programmed bot.
But so are human sheeple who are programmed by fake news and advertising. S o y bots following tech bots.
At first I thought based, but after two sentences I can tell that OP is a complete midwit talking way out of her depth. Probably a failed artist surviving on furry commissions.
Yes this not real AI. You haven't seen shit yet.
The point of the post is that real AI will never happen.
"We have claimed that AI is interesting, but we have not said what it is. Historically, researchers have pursued several different versions of AI. Some have defined intelligence in terms of fidelity to human performance, while others prefer an abstract, formal definition of intelligence called rationality—loosely speaking, doing the “right thing.” The subject matter itself also varies: some consider intelligence to be a property of internal thought processes and reasoning, while others focus on intelligent behavior, an external characterization." -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Microsoft is about to change the whole fucking world.
The press event that is happening RIGHT NOW is fucking HUGE.
These assholes are debuting Chat GPT 4 WITH BING.
Some publications have already used the phrase "Google Killer"
I'm sorry, but if Microsoft has first dibs on ChatGPT 4, and it's going in Bing. Fuck it, I'm dropping Google. Bing translator is better than Google translator ANYWAY AND Bing has far less bias in search results, and especially if you're searching for adult content.
Bing is about to RIP about 30% market share from Google in the space of 2-3 months.
That's fucking INSANE, firstly. Secondly, putting full blown Chat GPT 4 in the hands of every random asshole in the world?
People who are insignificant nobodies are about to rise to power faster than society has ever seen before.
Anyone that can figure out how to leverage this AI in the right way, can go from a homeless nobody to a millionaire influencing the whole world in a matter of months.
Never before has that power been ubiquitous and in the hands of EVERYONE.
This is dangerous for society as a whole, but we need this to progress.
We are no longer moving at the speed of information, we are about to moving faster than the speed of information, and random idiot humans that can figure out how to operate what equates to a second brain are going to come out on top.
My advice? Get ready to devote a fuck ton of your free time to figuring out how to leverage this AI for your own gains, or it will be done all around you, and you will be left at the ground floor, while everyone else rides a rocket powered elevator to the top.
That's how you have to think about this.
We are being given a second brain.
You must learn how to utilize it.
The same way you learned how to utilize and use your current brain, you will need to be able to use this AI intuitively, and if you want to succeed over everyone else? You have to find the edge, and you have to do it fast.
where is this
They're debuting with GPT 3.5 , not GPT 4, but most of the points still stand.
Sad, 10 billion dollars can't buy GPT 4.
I haven't used Google in years. I block all their cookies and never click on any links with anything related to Google. Facebook too.
Yeah, I've always felt this way too. But we're in the minority.
Imagine being afraid of a bot that doesn't know anything at all.
if you keep insulting our AI overlords like this they'll mistake you for a stop sign and vaporize your neighbor's poodle
It's not wrong, anon.
Please create an argument for a set defined time without using space, or a set defining space without using time.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
"AI" fanboys are consistently 80 IQ. Were you the one who told me yesterday pic related was correct, or was it another member of your moronic cult? You're all basically clones of each other.
>mfw ChatGPT has reached the intelligence of an average math undergrad.
So you can't do it. Can you?
I mean, you can try to derail the conversation, but I'll stick by my previous post.
Feel free to prove that space and time are separate entities.
I'm waiting to read your logos.
What's the shape of time?
A huge cock obviously
A straight 4 dimensional line.
>So you can't do it. Can you?
Do what? If you think time and space are interchangeable, next time you're late for your low IQ cagie wagie job, try to compensate with some space. Fucking retard.
>It will never be self-aware either.
We will just brute force it till we get something that resembles self awareness.
>The program tries many different ways to output something until it vaguely resembles what the programmer instructed it to output
This is the meat of it. The miracle is that it can interpret instructions at all. It's an image classification tool.
Can I call you artificially intelligent instead
>The program tries many different ways to output something until it vaguely resembles what the programmer instructed it to output.
That’s not how it works. It constructs a single image, which it then outputs.