Stockfish didn't kill human chess, and AI won't replace your job. Relax.

Stockfish didn't kill human chess, and AI won't replace your job. Relax.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    chess is not a job you freaking moron

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I cant possibly imagine being a grown ass man and having this shit on your drive and even posting it, you need to have the brain of a fucking infant to indulge in this shit

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        (you)
        >anime website
        Newgays should be leashed and forced to watch 1000 hours of moe

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Jokes on you, I never had a real job in the first place

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    game AI is not real AI.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's right, just relax and let it not happen.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can ChatGPT help me cheat with analbeads on coding interviews?

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I cant possibly imagine being a grown ass man and having this shit on your drive and even posting it, you need to have the brain of a fucking infant to indulge in this shit

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      dust thoughever

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you're a garden gnome for not liking child porn
      Also, the brimstone that killed the sharty

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wow very good shitpost anon, very cringe for normies

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno why people are hyped up. It's the same hysteria that happens from people who don't understand neural networks or machine learning and think it's the fucking terminator

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      And you'll keep saying it's not Skynet until the moment it is.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It might end up as skynet if it keeps going the way it is, but my point is, we're not approaching sentience with neural networks.

        It's just a neat pathfinding quirk we learned from studying brain cells. And how we can simulate that in a computer is pretty neat

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is no financial benefit from killing chess with AI.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It did though. Remember the pajeet who was caught cheating with it in a tourney?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    In reality sentient AI that is as complicated as a human being is possible and they can theoretically replace our jobs, but it will not happen in the next 500 years so why even care. People are computers themselves, an over-complicated biological computer that works on electronic impulses and bio-nary (I call the whole chemical interactions in your brain like this), so replicating a human brain with silicon, gold, platinum and copper, its entirely possible but not for now.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >but it will not happen in the next 500 years
      Why are you so confident in that?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >500 years
        Another ass pull prophecy

        The other neural structures are not quite simulated yet. It's happening pretty quickly, good strides in the visual cortex, but a large part of the brain is also its interaction with the real world.

        Not only would we have to develop the human brain, but a full sensory experience for that brain. It's possible, but I don't think it's gonna happen the way people are thinking it's gonna happen. To just recreate everything perfectly would be to just genetically engineer a baby

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >500 years
      Another ass pull prophecy

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What a fucking low iq andy, you should be invited on joe rogan

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Google translate also didn't kill translation jobs for some reason you can still find shit to work on fiverr for example

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Stockfish didn't kill human chess
    it just needed a little help

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That actually made chess much more popular.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because people are interested in watching humans play chess, the process is what's interesting, not what the board looks like on the final turn. All that matters with programming, art, and everything else AI can automate is that final output.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chesst players are like porn actress, codemonkeys are like the cameraman and the lube guy

    You WILL lose your job

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >lube guy
      what?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sorry only garden gnomes can be lube guys

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chess is a human game, not an economic game.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *