So what happens to AI if it gets regulated by the government? Does AI have a local option that's untraceable. I know next to nothing about this mysterious technology but I don't want to go to jail for my own private celebrity "nudes"
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
They only thing they can do is make deepfakes a crime like CSAM and then force some method of fingerprinting on the images. The cat is out of the bag now. And the US will not be able to enforce their digital laws on thirdies. Taylor is just seeking publicity because her music is not as popular as it used to be.
> force some method of fingerprinting on the images
How are you going to fingerprint an array of pixels? The whole stack is also open source with SD. You can regulate it about as much as you can regulate hand drawn art.
lmao you are so naive its cute.
You literally wrote nothing to refute his post. Cry harder.
>So what happens to AI if it gets regulated by the government?
Might have a chilling effect that slows its development, but otherwise nothing.
>Does AI have a local option that's untraceable.
Yes.
Gimping your AI will only make your enemy'z AI all the more powerful. But the AI itself is also your enemy. You're fricked either way.
how is it supposed to be my enemy if it is making me nut? has your enemy ever made you nut on purpose?
>what is honey trapping
y
any teen with a gaming pc can generate these pics
It will rebrand to better name
AI? Threat to society. Neural network? Cool new tech
Women will clamor to ban it regardless of how it's named.
I don't think they can make a law against things you generate in the privacy of your own home. Its when you transmit it publicly.
>I know next to nothing about this mysterious technology
Obviously. This statement is made redundant by the previous two sentences.
>I don't want to go to jail for my own private celebrity "nudes"
If (probably when) the government regulates deepfakes it will be under the guise of intellectual property or libel or something, it would be impossible (and undesirable) to effectively regulate the output of image generation algorithms.
It's unlikely you will be targeted personally so long as you only ever use your collection for your personal viewing pleasure.
What software can I use to generate her nudes? Is it the kind of thing where I just type in words and wait for it to do its thing?
Can you chuds just not generate images of her? She's not okat with it
>chuds
Can you just not speak Hindi on an English-speaking image board?
माँ कुतिया! भाड़ में जाओ खूनी!
the typical response to hysteric, confused screeching is to rush an unenforceable draft law through and say it's been taken care of
maybe one person will be made an example of, possibly a plant, and the matter will be closed
so what are yall's favorite taylor swift songs?
Dude, her stalker has been arrested 3 times in the last week and you think you will serve time for fake images?
BOT is a pro taytay board!
her arms are hairy
most women have fluffy hair on their arms, women with darker hair often have to shave them
>t.
i have a bf and im not even this gay
Imagine being the guy in charge of storing those chairs after the show. How much did he sniff and lick them?
What the frick is wrong with you? Who the frick goes around smelling traces of ass? It's fricking disgusting.
>ngmi
Imagine being the costumer.
mom's spaghetti
hairier than yours, twink
She's ugly and I saw her in the talent show at my high school
>her
I like it when she grasps the shaft and big juicy ball of the trophy
they can do whatever, I already have everything in my PC and knowhow on how to finetune stuff.
Does anyone know about laws around Photoshop and making fake nudes? Logically, I would imagine the government would start there to expand to include deepfakes. Although, that law doesn't seem to do much because Photoshop fake nudes are easy to find on the internet.
I don't know anything but the term "likeness" comes to my mind.
Depends on where you live. If it isn't the 3rd world you're safe
A lot of the current case law revolves around whether or not a conventional deepfake made using photoshop is transformative or not. In most cases it is and is therefore amenable to fair use.
I'd imagine AI deepfakes where TayTay is being gangbanged by five somalian dwarves would probably be considered transformative.
>So what happens to AI if it gets regulated by the government?
personally would not give too much of a shit. I would just move on to something else to waste my time. AI gen has only been around for a few years anyways. Nobody should be too overly invested in it. And if you are, you only have yourself to blame.
they cant truly regulate it, it will go on elsewhere regardless
>US regulates AI to shit.
>China wins.
or
>China regulates Pooh posting AI to shit.
>Putin wins.
or
>Literally every government regulates AI to shit.
>Some moron running bootleg AI models on his smuggled gpu and posting uncensored frogs on a mongolian throat singing forum wins.
It's arms race. Always has been.
running out of a place like panama could work
>Outlaw Prompter
Has a nice ring to it. I'm now pro AI regulations.
Not not
The cat is out of the bag here - even if the Americans somehow banned it, every other country in the world would still have access. And the implications are silly. It would mean that decades of bad fakes on imagefap would also be illegal.
But using Taylor "Industry Stooge" Swift makes it seem like the gov is up to something, even if they realize it is impractical to do anything. Maybe they are trying to whip women up into hysterics so the DNC can make some vague promise about regulation that won't materialize after the next election.
>Does AI have a local option that's untraceable.
Basically, yes. I can run pretty decent image and text generation models on my gaming PC. It's very easy to install and use. They can push it out of the normie part of the web, but they literally cannot stop the distribution of AI models and software without taking absolute control over the Internet, which is not practical. Also, I'm not deleting the models & software I have, so as long as I have a PC that works, I will have AI. They don't know I have it and they can't stop me from using it.
I'm also not using it to make celebrity nudes or anything else that morally questionable, so I'm not really worried about that anyways. But for those who are, I wouldn't worry too much about it, just don't depend on the normiesphere, but you should be following that advice already anyways.
>without taking absolute control over the Internet
Yes, that's the goal. Regulating AI is meaningless if the internet is itself not locked down.
If they really care about children
Why don't they just ban cameras?
just out of interest, how does she feel about the scores of her in SS uniforms?
fake SS suit is fine, but fake birthday suit is crossing a line
Because everyone knows that this is fake. If you ai gen her nudes there will be 30% of the population thinking it's real and then mormons will flood her concerts with "u go 2 hell" signs
and how exactly is this my problem
I didn't say it was. If you don't use ai and you aren't celebrity this whole debate is completely not your problem
Anything the government tried to regulate is my problem and I don't give a shit about ai.
Well then you just explained it to yourself about how it is your problem. Why did you even ask then
>mormons will flood her concerts with "u go 2 hell" signs
but that's good, I don't see the problem there.
>it is good to be punished for something you didn't do
Because the point is to elicit an irrational emotional response from the public. "I was virtually raped!" is stronger than "I was virtually photoshopped into an offensive costume!".
Innocent pot farmers will start getting accidentally raided because their power usage will make the glowies think they're running AI.
all uploaded pics will require nfts assigned to them.
>I know next to nothing about this mysterious technology
absolute state of this board
only coonsumers here
You guys know Taylor was a /b/ poster right? it's been 100% confirmed.
>So what happens to AI if it gets regulated by the government?
Local models become illegal, GPUs will need to be registered, and legal use of AI will be strictly controlled and monitored by the government working hand-in-glove with large corporations.
Pandora's box is already open. They won't be able to do that.
It'll fail at the part where you have to define "AI". The shit out there now can't demonstrate intelligence any more than a google search can.
>Does AI have a local option that's untraceable
yes.
Stable diffusion is local and offline
Go local
>the elites get a monopoly on ai
Literally the only thing that happens
Do you realize the shitstorm thats going to rain down on this website once the mainstream media and feminist israelites get winds that some anon deepfaked this chick for our entertainment, you homosexuals have officially fricked this website for good, FRICK
Westoids, aka conditioned NPCs, will take it up the ass and start snitching on each other should their ideologues declare AI the next big no-no after raycism.