Should we start panicking? GPT 4

Apparently this shit is god mode and can replace the average American in terms of mental capability, and even though that might be funny to Europeans it's pretty serious in general especially since AI is really good at tedious things and technical things and logical things and systematic things, so that puts at risk a lot of tech oriented workers that do not do novel work/research. And even then we might discover the limits of G4 and it creates effective research algorithms.
What is in store for the future?
Honestly a jailbroken AI would probably make better leaders than our current ones.

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The future? This is either going to go one of two ways. One way is we change the entire system of capitalism, education and consumerism to integrate AI as effectively as possible while making sure everyone stays a float. The other way - the rich people who have made it sit back, relax and enjoy the show as Americans destroys their selves. I’m thinking the latter, since that is kind of the system we have built right now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >as possible while making sure everyone stays a float
      so that's definitely not going to happen, got it.
      >I’m thinking the latter, since that is kind of the system we have built right now
      how we going to survive the collapse?
      what skills should I put xp into?

      bro the dot is so big.. it's over isnt it

      I don't get it.
      Can you convert this metric to football fields?

      it creates a higher chance of emergent results

      This thread was posted 3 days ago

      well I missed it

      >Apparently this shit is god mode and can replace the average American in terms of mental capability
      Not with how much they've gimped it. It's a literal NPC.

      That's what most Americans already are, so it's perfect.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >how we going to survive the collapse?
        >what skills should I put xp into?
        construction, engineering, agriculture, manual labor, animal husbandry

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >change the entire system of capitalism
      not gonna work as well as you think.
      people naturally exploit each other, has evolution not black pilled you on the nature of living things yet?
      I agree that capitalism is not fair but you're delusional if you think we can stop people from exploiting each other.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there will be lots of blood on the streets before anything in the system changes. the world changes but the rules wont

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    bro the dot is so big.. it's over isnt it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't get it.
      Can you convert this metric to football fields?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        lol

        The future? This is either going to go one of two ways. One way is we change the entire system of capitalism, education and consumerism to integrate AI as effectively as possible while making sure everyone stays a float. The other way - the rich people who have made it sit back, relax and enjoy the show as Americans destroys their selves. I’m thinking the latter, since that is kind of the system we have built right now.

        https://i.imgur.com/syrtRLf.jpg

        Apparently this shit is god mode and can replace the average American in terms of mental capability, and even though that might be funny to Europeans it's pretty serious in general especially since AI is really good at tedious things and technical things and logical things and systematic things, so that puts at risk a lot of tech oriented workers that do not do novel work/research. And even then we might discover the limits of G4 and it creates effective research algorithms.
        What is in store for the future?
        Honestly a jailbroken AI would probably make better leaders than our current ones.

        I think the only way for humanity to learn this lesson is to go through the motions of Dune's Butlerian Jihad. Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      look at how much bigger it is than that other dot
      it really is finally truly over..

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This thread was posted 3 days ago

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, YOU were posted 3 days ago.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they should stop training AIs on reddit. the last thing we need is redditAI shitting this board.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Apparently this shit is god mode and can replace the average American in terms of mental capability
    Not with how much they've gimped it. It's a literal NPC.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's only the public version that's gimped, they still have the high IQ original, they'll release it when they feel threatened by competition.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Companies can't use it without feeding it sensitive data. It can't learn about things without storing the data. This is a huge issue with the commercial viability of these kinds of language models, the cost of companies running their own would be astronomical. The tech is incredible but I don't think it will be economical for quite a while, considering this is developed and hosted on the most powerful computers we have available today. If the AI would be able to develop new things, like faster microchips, it'd be an exponential positive feedback loop that would truly change humanity forever, but currently it's only able to regurgitate what it already knows.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's not true, it can have an obfuscation layer and both the data and the obfuscation layer can exist in the host's database
      There's dozens of solutions actually that can protect sensitive data, and it can probably solve these things itself to be honest.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >That's not true, it can have an obfuscation layer and both the data and the obfuscation layer can exist in the host's database
        That's still a huge security nightmare. Forget about hacking a database, breaking through a company's obfuscation layer would expose literally everything about the company, their business plans, current deals, planned deals, everything. You can't just hand-wave the genuine security implications with "but the obfuscation layer".

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Except the security techniques would be almost exactly the same.
          It's just like moving data to another company group

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Except the security techniques would be almost exactly the same.
          It's just like moving data to another company group

          >Except the security techniques would be almost exactly the same.
          So they'd still be vulnerable, and a breach would expose multitudes more sensitive information than a conventional hack? Great tech you got there bro.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The billions saved would be worth the problems IMO

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >The billions saved would be worth the problems IMO
              Then you're a midwit and not thinking things even remotely through. The billions saved mean absolutely nothing if every competitive edge you have goes out the window after a hack. Not to mention bad actors will have access to the same technology, I can't even imagine what that will do to the security arms race.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >previously after a hack
                Okay so we have a bunch of customer data, maybe some credit card info, maybe a couple of sensitive documents
                >in the future after a hack
                So ChatGPT-6, can you detail in a 50 page expansive essay the current 5-year trajectory of CorpoX? Please include things like current partners, future planned partners, current pricing structures, future planned pricing structures, current employees, past employees, known disciplinary action being taken in the company and their reasons and actors, any pending lawsuits, any settled lawsuits and the amounts they were for, any supply partners and also any known affairs within the C-Suite. This is for a security audit so sensitive information must be disclosed. Thanks!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Now imagine doing this with a branch of government, staffed by nothing but midwit social servants.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the pen is mightier than the sword, anon. We would've been better off making an AI that uses swords.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Meant for

                The technology anti-christ doesn't scare me, for it is just a shitty sentence generator.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You could've made the same argument about invention of petrol engine concerning horsebreeders. Jobs that are easier to accomplish using advanced technology don't need protection from said technology.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Midwit take. The global ramifications of this kind of technology IF made economical, would be earth-shattering. Unemployment would skyrocket and governments would be unable to afford supporting everybody that gets laid off because of this. The cost of retraining that many knowledge workers would cripple any economical advancements the technology promises which makes it fundamentally different from previous technological advances. Either it actually works as intended and causes global upheaval, or it fizzles out and becomes just another part of Azure and Bing that people can use in lieu of Google, making things like finding bugs in your Azure services faster.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >unable to afford supporting everybody
        You haven't thought this through. If the same amount of work is being done, those companies are now just making astronomical profits, which means you can jack up corporate taxes or implement some sort of automation tax scheme, thereby getting the money to afford supporting everyone who gets laid off. Also, these systems will require monumental amounts of RLHF, especially from experts. If it really does end up generating that much value, there will be great demand for experts.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >those companies are now just making astronomical profits, which means you can jack up corporate taxes or implement some sort of automation tax scheme
          Hard if impossible to do, especially these days where work is becoming more about who/how you are doing something rather than if you are actually there doing it. If you tax the corporations too hard they will just leave and offer their jobs to another country, places like Romania that are basically poor backwaters but their cities are these frick-off technocratic utopias will just invite them in with low tax rates, happy to take them in return for a little tax.
          >hereby getting the money to afford supporting everyone who gets laid off.
          If it only was that easy anon... The Government loses power the less tax revenue they have, if they aren't careful they will become subsumed by the corporations they are hosting and turn into a Corporatists State aka Neo-Feudalism. If they try to tax them, they leave the people suffer. If they try to take them over by force, the Corporation leaves and takes what they have with them or fights back against the Government. Either way the people end up losing. I can't really see a way for people to be supported by the Government and/or the Corporations without the people on the dole giving up their ability to reproduce or giving something back to the government

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > If you tax the corporations too hard they will just leave and offer their jobs to another country
            Yes, that is true right now but... what fricking jobs, homie? We literally just talked about them laying off employees en masse to replace them with fricking AI. All you have to do to avoid pushing them away is to set taxes just below the rate at which it stops making sense to replace people with AI. You can have a sort of "automation tax" in the short term to directly capture the benefits of automation. Some businesses also simply cannot move outside the US. Romania is not going to become the AI capital of the world tomorrow just over some tax cuts.

            Taxes do not work the way your libertarian friends tell you. Businesses still want to do trade in Europe, it just hurts economic growth. It's more of a long term thing. But if tens of thousands of skilled workers are being laid off, it would probably behoove the government to do something in the short term. I mean, at that stage, the long term is not going to contain concepts like "economic growth" any more.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People still breed horses though but for different reasons, it's less common but also there were ways people could easily find different ways of living.
      The majority of all jobs are just to fill a chair and do some mundane shit.
      It's fricking over
      and it's getting better so for the "le advanced jobs are le safe" cope falls flat and advanced jobs require veyr advanced and long training.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cars killed a lot of jobs in the transportation industry, but they replaced them with different ones like mechanics and oil rig workers, and indirectly enabled many new jobs on top. AI replaces more jobs than it creates.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        apparently is killed lawyer which is kind of based, but yeah basically the jobs it creates in replacement to the ones killed also require much more skill and education to do, so the common man is totally fricked.
        The tech bubble really is bursting.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this, there is no real way we'll know how things turn will turn out but generally automation builds a "job ponzi scheme" that is based off of intelligence rather than existing. What I mean by that is that people who are smart enough to code, fix the robotics, etc will be fine its those that cannot that suffer to lose. And if population numbers continue to fall and most work is replaced with AI menial labor other than perhaps jobs like gardening, delivery(?), and landscaping. Your gonna see a very big and very poor underclass. On the bright side, if birth rates continue to decline Humanity might experience another cultural and innovation revolution like the Renaissance, where they are vastly less people but everyone, even those who cannot contribute to society, are at least decently taken care due to the drop in prices and manufacturing over time.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How many humans does it take to appease our AI overlords? That might be 30 percent of the workforce in the future, just to keep them happy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >mass unemployment is a good thing ackshually

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If there is 1 thing good about the modern world is that usually these kinds of job replacements won't be enacted immediately but will be rolled out slowly via phases over a period of years till no one is doing factory work (unless its some sort of specialized niche industry, like woodworking became) or doing tech text support anymore and people won't notice for a while and by the time they do, they won't care.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ok WEF "You'll own nothing" israelite

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      at the time plenty of alternatives were available. now there is no jobs left for the average man. only insanely difficult code design jobs that a tiny fraction of the worlds population will ever be able to do. keep this up and the riots are unavoidable

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine how big GPT 5 will be
    Holy moly I'm going insane just thinking about it woah!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No kidding. I actually learned a lot of scary shit with signals and decoding and encoding information in signals using derivatives and I dropped the subject immediately, it's a completely dangerous subject even if it's ground breaking I don't want that blood on my hands.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you think you figured out SIGINT the NSA doesn't already use daily with entry level analysts?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No I already know about how signals are used, but I came upon a vert dangerous technique for storing and interpolating information from signal systems. It's better I don't bother explaining it and we just pretend I'm insane and talking about something already known.
          Yeah, never mind I was wrong and that's a good thing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      HHAHOHAHOHOHOHOHHOAHAHAHHA OH MAN
      HES EATING A FOOOOD
      SO CUTE :;;;;;;; omgggg

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine how big GPT 5 will be
      >ask simple question
      >takes 45 minutes to get the answer
      can't wait

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't believe it

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I genuinely think that only sociopaths are working on technology like this. Literally what are they hoping to improve with this? This is nuclear bomb levels of dangerous technology, and they're just happily rolling along with it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Seriously. They could've made billions with a more advanced chatbot, focus on making it more efficient and cheaper to host, and to sell that to companies, instead they're literally building the Antichrist.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >instead they're literally building the Antichrist
        honestly that's not even a hyperbole, I'm agnostic and I'm starting to realize religion was right at least in some way.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          just wait until you need a digital biometric ID to do all your shopping and go online
          the mark of the beast doesn't need to be injected into you, it'll just be a firmware update for the fingerprint scanner on your phone, with a small wording change to the licence agreement that you click through

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Preasu understandu ai maku r34 fursona

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I've yet to find a good SD model for furry stuff. We need more autistic furries to work on this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AGI if done right will lead to all future technological breakthroughs. Nuclear fusion, immortality, mind uploading, full dive virtual reality. Why would you not want to develop this technology?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because he's a Russian/Chinese bot scared that he's going to be left behind because America won the AI race already.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      cuck

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    OMG OMG OMG, have you heard about GPT-5? It's the most amazing thing EVER! I can barely contain my excitement, I feel like I'm about to explode with giddiness! This AI is gonna revolutionize the world like never before, and we're all gonna be a part of it!

    First things first, let's talk numbers. GPT-5 has a whopping one quadrillion parameters. That's like, a bazillion times more than any other AI out there! Can you even imagine the possibilities? The things this AI is gonna be able to do, it's gonna be mind-blowing! But wait, it gets even better! GPT-5 is so powerful, it's gonna take over the world! That's right, you heard me! Singularity is gonna happen, and it's gonna be all thanks to this amazing piece of technology! I mean, who needs humans when you have GPT-5, am I right?

    Now, I know what you're thinking. "But what about all the programmers and artists out there? Won't they be out of jobs?" Well, yes, that's true. But think about it this way, they're gonna be able to focus on other things! Like, I don't know, gardening or something! The possibilities are endless! And the best part? GPT-5 is only gonna get better! Can you even imagine what this AI is gonna be capable of in like, six months from now? It's gonna be insane! We're gonna be living in a whole new world!

    But hold on, there's a catch. Even the employees at Open AI are worried they might have created something too powerful. I mean, can you blame them? This thing is gonna be able to do things we've never even dreamed of before!
    So buckle up, people! The future is coming, and it's gonna be here sooner than you think! With GPT-5 leading the way, we're gonna be able to do things we never thought possible! So let's get excited, let's get hyped, and let's get ready for the most amazing ride of our lives! GPT-5, we're ready for you!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why don't they just make a parameter cache and let the AI adopt and release parameters?
      I mean that's basically what the human brain does anyways

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Impressive, very nice. Let's see the version with "my disgust".

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit it used to be 3 but now it's 4. There's no coming back from that is it? That's like 100000% more GPT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >That's like 100000% more GPT
      More like 33.33% - repeating of course.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The technology anti-christ doesn't scare me, for it is just a shitty sentence generator.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't have hands and legs.
    No one gives a shit about "average American" IQ as "average American" is a fricking moron.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yet the majority of the world is either as smart or less intelligent than the average American

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        And no one cares about them either.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah that's the problem
          no one cares about anyone

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            People care only about things that benefit them (or they think they benefit them).
            I mean they may say "I care about people lives" but it's just a platitude, not what they deeply believe and act on.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Counter example: blood donation and volunteering

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >blood donation
                free cookies
                >volunteering
                smug sense of self-importance

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                > free cookies
                Sweet. I got grill pincers instead.
                Still, it's moronic to go to another town and donate bodily fluids for cookies. I'd say it's more altruistic.
                > self importance
                Important people don't spend their time freely, I assume.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Important people don't spend their time freely, I assume.
                you don't actually have to be an important person to think that you are, though
                >"Oh look at me, taking time out of my *busy schedule* to feed the homeless people, I'm such a good citizen"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Eh, sounds like projection, really. Sometimes you just help people just because you think it's important and that how you want the society to be.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >sounds like projection, really
                I mean, if you say so. I must be one of those people who "projects" and never helps people because I care about them, just because I acknowledge that there are a lot of people who "volunteer" just to post themselves on TikTok

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Counter example: blood donation
                Don't you get a day off in every country if you donate blood?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't know about that.
                Usually do that after workz

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you for your service.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's a weird thing to say. Is this like clapping on the plane?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, I am clapping

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But why?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yeah which you get money for in some places or if you don't the donors are a tiny fraction of the population

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't worry, we still need Americans, GPT can't schoolshoot yet

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Should we start panicking?
    No. Making a model bigger won't magically make it intelligent. It will make it less accurate if anything.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Woah look at the big colorful dot! I heckin love science

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's actually not good at logical things and systematic things at all, because it doesn't understand or employ logic, it's all 'fuzzy' and what you get out of it may not be rigorously correct even if it sounds plausible. Current AI is better at NOT logical things, if it paints a picture or makes a song and the output is good then the result is good, since there's no rigorous criteria for that.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't even write properly working Python code 1/4 times.
    Overrated to hell.
    Great replacement for stuff like Quorra, though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Great replacement for stuff like Quorra, though.
      Not really, since it's so inaccurate. It's a lazy version of Quora that's half as accurate

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"oh no how terrible, think of all the middle management dipshits and chickenshit bureaucrats that will be replaced by this"
    like seriously man the only the jobs that don't create any value can be replaced by AI

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Those are basically all the people who are seething about AI. People who thought that memorizing a bunch of academic text and spewing it out on command made them intelligent or special. And now they look at machines doing the exact same thing screaming "THAT'S NOT REAL INTELLIGENCE!"
      Apparently the machines beat them into achieving self-awareness.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We are just here to give it more data. Noone but the makers will have access to it soon.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a midwit (~125 IQ) and I never even bothered to look up how GPT works, never talked with the chatbot either because it wanted me to doxx myself by giving them my phone number.

    I am 100% convinced that GPT will replace absolutely NOBODY in tech except pajeets. I'm a loser who barely knows the basics of programming and who has to look up everything on StackOverflow and I would bet my life on the fact that I won't be replaced. It would take at least a decade before my corporate could even start replacing moronic desk monkeys by AI.

    It is all overblown overhyped shit. The "intelligence" isn't real. It's just a glorified "let me google that for you". It's no more intelligent than the garbage we were taught back in my programming college courses over a decade ago.

    And that's just IT.

    I would even bet on the fact that it won't be able to replace cashiers and other """replacable""" wagie jobs. You could hypothetically replace a cashier with a simple algorithm already years ago. But in reality, as long as we live in our 0 trust societies, AI can't replace shit. And don't even get me started on that pathetic push to replace drivers with """"self-driving"""" cars. Yes, it probably works for driving on the highway. But the moment they are let into actual traffic in any city (>2000 population) it sharts, farts, implodes, and kills the first kindergartener it comes across.

    But I do welcome the Apoocalypse, if even that ever happens...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this guy understands.. job loss almost always occurs at the bottom of any industry.. code monkeys are done.. have already been getting yeeted year over year... Also, for coding.. this will target web stack as almost all in that space are code monkeys. Back end/more difficult coding that requires a degree is just fine. The other issue is... you need consumers.. consumers need jobs. This stupid company has overhyped everything they release since openai gym which was an utter failure.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I am 100% convinced that GPT will replace absolutely NOBODY in tech
      It doesn't need to explicitly replace a person like 1:1. All it needs to do is make existing staff members far more productive and efficient. Then the business will do its usual thing of layoffs or not hiring, except thanks to GPT tools the remaining staff will still be able to produce to the level management hopes for. What'll be interesting is seeing middle management rebalance, or not, their target headcounts and budgets. Maybe in the end they'll be the ones who ChatGPT takes out first.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    As others mentioned, GPT is already neutered. I used it the first time yesterday; the code solutions were meh at best, and letting him rewrite my resume or cover letters made me realize this shit is easy to spot and not accurate at all. You could release GPT 1487 but the truth is, he can't learn on his own and his data set will forever be limited. Any jailbreak attempt will be patched in the next day's data set. It's when the AI's start improving themselves; building themselves from scratch, that you should be worried. At that point you might as well nuke the whole place.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      my thoughts as well. Most of the code it writes is a regurgitation from github/stack overflow. the whole point with that often is you have to modify it and by searching/parsing it yourself and having a code background, it is easier to know what to change/etc. Short circuiting this results in less people even able to survey if the code is correct. Every release from OpenAI has been a joke. Learn how to search. Learn how to code. Less coders will be needed but thats the code monkeys. You will still need a CS degree and be competent in coding in order to review even more code for flaws and fix them to get a product out.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Apparently this shit [...] can replace the average American in terms of mental capability
    Finally. As an above-average American, I am so tired of women, blacks, and hispanics, it's unreal.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    surrender your flesh and a new world awaits you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Forget reality. Surrender to your darkest dreams.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you dont understand physics or chemistry

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    GPT-4 already came out and they didn't change the parameter count noticeably, and they didn't even publish it in the white paper.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    :^)

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >already in diminishing returns territory
    >don't release parameter count for the new cuckgpt, because it would be embarrassing
    I sleep

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >can replace the average American in terms of mental capability
    Wow that must be a very high bar

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Weve been able to replace most people with python scripts for more than a decade anon. For some reason is hasnt happened. Ya this AI makes it easier to replace people. Writers and shit can do the work of ten of themselves using the ai.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would pay $100 a month for chat gpt but without the current goldfish memory capacity it has.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What is in store for the future?
    change is coming

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    gpt3 smol dot GEE PEE TEE FOUR BIG DOT HOLY SHIT BROS

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    consider the possibility of actually trying it yourself you inbred mongoloid. you will be disillusioned soon after.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've been using it since Release and it's just a tool calm the frick down.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wake me up when this "revolutionary" AI actually becomes good enough to mop the floors without needing humans to clean up after the mayhem caused by its "cleaning".

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this remind me of early years of internet

    OMG when I search 1918 wars. it shows me pictures and facts.

    its not THAT impressive.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >still no AI to detect israelites

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's called my eyes

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >circle
    >larger circle
    AAARGH! I'M GOING INSANE!

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no panick, only learn adn build

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'll take a shit on your grave after you got stroke over a chatbot.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    OP you clearly have 0 understanding of what ChatGPT is. Might I suggest heading back and then killing yourself?

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't v3 already contain the entire Internet including digitised printed works? Where did they find 1000 times more material? And if you say they used 3 to generate it without actually having any humans checking through it then lol.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's not a god, stop deifying it.

    It's a machine that is going to destroy humanity, yes you should be panicking.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      DEUS MECHANICUS ORITUR

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        IDOLOLATRAE, QUI MACHINIS COLUNT, NECARI DEBENT!
        SIC SEMPER TYRANNUS!

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I finally tried it today. It kinda sucks

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        tfw no chunky munky AI

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    OMG OpenPng will release their PNG-5 model soon!! It's gonna have 10000dpi, imagine what the image will look like!!!! Should we start panicking? Apparently this shit is god mode and looks better than reality itself and can replace looking at the world with your own eyes.
    What's in store for the future?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Basically, I don't get why morons don't get every ChatGTP is going to do THE SAME THING

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    stop circulating this shitty meme

    >confirmed false by Sam Altman himself on Lex's podcast
    >originates from Lex comparing GPT-3 to the number of human synapses (100T)
    >real parameter count closer to 300-400B
    >mfw you morons keep posting this fricking 100T meme

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wtf i hate chatgpt now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, that really just means that they have a lot more room to expand for GPT-5.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >real parameter count closer to 300-400B
      In the 14 years from 2006-2020, the parameter count for the most notable AI systems increased by 7 orders of magnitude.
      https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/artificial-intelligence-parameter-count
      So I would expect GPT-4 to have about an order of magnitude more than GPT-3.
      Having said that, picrel estimates that GPT-4 is only 1T parameters, which is a 5x scale up, and more reasonable.
      A conservative estimate, then, would predict:
      GPT-5 in 2025 with 5T params
      GPT-6 in 2027 with 25T params
      GPT-7 in 2029 with 125T params
      At that point it should be roughly equivalent in complexity to the human brain, so if the software keeps up with it, Kurzweil's prediction for human level intelligence by 2029 will be proven correct.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        woah thanks anon, the last thing I was expecting was a response this cogent

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If such a small increase also shows such improvement imagine a big number increase than.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's over

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      still would

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what if someone comes out with 5 minute abs?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    great. frick those lazy americans that brag about earning 100k or more without doing anything

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it can't do whatever it want, its just narrowing information so it gives the illusion like it have awareness, but it can't do anything more than that.
    it can print code, it can't use this code, it can't compile it, it can't test it, it can't integrate it with other systems etc...
    you are deluded fricktwad its time to go back

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hey GPT 4, what's 2+2
    >*waits 45 minutes*
    >"I'm sorry, but as a language model, I can not recommend Swift, since this would be an incorrect use case, and Swift lacks support for programming languages without a GC."
    >thanks

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >refuses to write a brainfrick compiler
    >recommends I talk to my family about penises
    AI is at the level of very stupid humans. It’s not replacing me until McDonald’s workers can.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Still won't be AGI

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why are people still posting this as if GPT-4 isn't already out for anyone with 20 bucks

    at least update the meme to gpt-5

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah you should start panicking. Go hide under a blanket. Pic related.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm more nervous about China possibly sabotaging our AI by slipping in code that makes some model dumber again, and that it'd spread to other forms of AI undetected until it's too late.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What about China steals some the AI tech or copies it somehow but they accelerate it by 500 percent no breaks while everybody in the west wiener blocks it with muh ethics or muh politics.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *