say NO to AI art

all AI art is generated off of the STOLEN work of millions of artists. It puts artists out of business and decreases the amount of jobs.

AI art is morally and ethically indefensible.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >all AI art is generated off of the STOLEN work

    Wrong.

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Art is about beauty and joy, not about jobs or business or whatever other israeli terms you want to use

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't read. Never will stop proomting.

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    i don't care about artists

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    But I don't care. I really, really don't care, and I'd rather that artists starve. they seem to get better that way.

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >It puts artists out of business
    THANK YOU BASED AI ART

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >"please i need money please commission me more"
      NOT SO FAST

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Horrible bait do better gay

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artists owe me drawings

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why did you put it online?
    Why did you make digital art at all?
    You wanted to use the internet to your advantage.
    Now it's time to pay the bills

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we gathered images from 1200 artists
    OF ARTISTS RAPED

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    you'll never be a good artist
    you'll never be a woman

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    No real art has been produced since 1880. Frick "artists" - I hope they and their families become homeless and starve to death.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Real money was made since the prehistory, please understand.

  13. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'ld just be stealing their art anyway so i don't care.

  14. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    All good art was made either in low budget or without funding

  15. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    This
    now commission an artist on twitter/x, if the artist accepts you and will not block you.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      who hurt you

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        the federal bankers and/or paypal staff

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        da jooos

  16. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    The cat is out of the bag - adapt or die.

  17. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    mate if i take a picture of pablo Picasso's and shit all over it, its still pablo Picasso's but who the frick cares now ye get me?

  18. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >t. Mickey Mouse
    Like, you all know that that's who any AI art-related laws are going to be written for the benefit of, right? The little guy will have a few useful idiots trotted out before the politicians for carefully planned testimony, and then tossed into the trash immediately afterwards. When the resulting laws have different real world impact than promised/suggested, their further complaints will be completely ignored.

    That's not even the worst case. Worst case is the laws get written so broadly to "protect artists" that common strategies used by artists to learn how to art will become explicitly illegal and fiercely enforced. Trace some art? That's a paddlin'. Learn art techniques from a (digital) book without an explicit license? That's a paddlin'. Draw a fanart piece? You better believe that's a paddlin'.

  19. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    all AI art is generated off of the STOLLEN work Just like crooked sleepy creepy Joe. It decreases the amount of jobs.

  20. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    being an artist is about making art, not money
    artwork copyright lasts throughout the author's life and for 50 years after their death

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >being an artist is about making art, not money
      objectivelly false
      millions of profesisonal artists makes much money since centuries ago.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >artwork copyright lasts throughout the author's life and for 50 years after their death
      in the US it's 90 years after the artist's death (or 120 years after publication if it's work-for-hire)

  21. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    you're way too late for that trainwreck, "artists" are on their coping phase already.

  22. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >decreases the amount of jobs
    why does everyone always assume that a vastly more efficient workforce displaces more job opportunities than it creates? Efficiencies open up opportunities that didn't exist before and industries that weren't possible because of human constraints. Do you think the invention of the computer was a net job loss just because it put some human calculators out of employment?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off israelite. The effect of more efficiency mostly is that a larger share of profits goes to stockholders. It used to be 1/3rd owners, 1/3rd taxes, 1/3rd employees.
      Now it's 1/2 owners, 1/4th taxes and 1/4th employees.

  23. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >STOLEN
    so they can't access their own work anymore?
    doesn't make sense
    almost like they published it publicly and anyone could see it including AI

  24. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    corpos and government will take AI from the goyim so no need to worry

  25. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kys troony

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      You first granny.

  26. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Inspiration is theft!
    j/k, artgays on troonicide watch.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      unfortunately is true
      the world is not derived by the originality, only cliches.

  27. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    get eaten

  28. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    By your logic, no human who had viewed copyrighted material should be allowed to create art. Like AI, we also use stuff we've seen before as a source of ideas and patterns to put in what we create.

  29. 7 months ago
    Anonymous
  30. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't read
    Seething inkcel

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Go to bed and learn to read.

  31. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >le heckin STOLEN jpegs
    They should've made their art into NFTs. Then it wouldn't be so fungible.

  32. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    would you call the painter a creator and maker?

    Certainly not.

    Yet if he is not the maker, what is he in relation to the bed?

    I think, he said, that we may fairly designate him as the imitator of that which the others make.

    Good, I said; then you call him who is third in the descent from nature an imitator?

    Certainly, he said.

    And the tragic poet is an imitator, and therefore, like all other imitators, he is thrice removed from the king and from the truth?

    That appears to be so.

    Then about the imitator we are agreed. And what about the painter?-- I would like to know whether he may be thought to imitate that which originally exists in nature, or only the creations of artists?

    The latter.

    As they are or as they appear? You have still to determine this.

    What do you mean?

    I mean, that you may look at a bed from different points of view, obliquely or directly or from any other point of view, and the bed will appear different, but there is no difference in reality. And the same of all things.

    Yes, he said, the difference is only apparent.

    Now let me ask you another question: Which is the art of painting designed to be--an imitation of things as they are, or as they appear-- of appearance or of reality?

    Of appearance.

    Pay your dues first thief artists.

  33. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    But there's hardly any real artists doing porn of my fetish.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *