Realistically speaking, how badly is AI going to destroy society?

Realistically speaking, how badly is AI going to destroy society?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not badly enough

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI does not exist. A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.

      AI is not what people think it is. It's just an algorithm. It has to be developed and customized, and for most businesses that is not work the 1-2 million dollars investment. So they'll purchase "platforms", programs which can do a few things well like route calls or answer simple questions via voice or text. It has to be trained so most places won't have the time, money or staff to do that.
      Here's the reality: these types of systems have existed for 15 years or more. Call centers have been shut down all over the world and nothing has really changed except roasties can't get call center jobs anymore.
      And if you're worried about automation, those tools have been around for a decade too. They're not able to do anything too complex without additional development, which most companies won't pay for. There's already low-code automation tools available, and they're expensive if you don't use something that already has an API integration.
      Basically, corporate greed and complex business logic will prevent AI from taking over any time soon. You've got about 20 years before the next generation of AI detected-integrations are available. Nothing and I mean NOTHING is standardized so it isn't happening now.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        have you worked in corporate? this is a problem even before AI, banking is running on 50 year old code
        what's changed is now anyone with a gaming pc can do it and it's open sourced

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes I worked for places like that, but where I'm at now is "cutting edge", and even we don't wanna pay millions to teach AI every damn use case we have for it. It isn't worth it until it's better and fast and doesn't need months of development for every single thing to work.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        I would also amend this statement to say that if you do REAL work, and not some stupid content-creation or design nonsense that ChatGPT can already do, then you're fine. If you are a creator of some corporate slop, you should be breaking rocks for a living already and deserve whatever happens to you.

  2. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI does not exist. A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      these programs are no different to our brains, they learn through trial and error and ultimately know nothing except their environment

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Learn about A.I

        AI does not exist. A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.

        Yeah, being able to replicate reality totally won't have an impact.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >these programs are no different to our brains, they learn through trial and error and ultimately know nothing except their environment

        they are nothing like human brains any more than microsoft excel is.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Learn A.I

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Learn A.I

            i did. i know how it works. its just a computer program.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              you have a bunch of nodes and they learn pattern recognition through brute forcing and using formulas to best predict the outcome given the input, so the limiting factor is the training data and the power
              if it had 18 years to train, and had the same number of nodes as a human brain, and was subject to the same environment, it would in theory function no different

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you have a bunch of nodes and they learn pattern recognition through brute forcing and using formulas to best predict the outcome given the input, so the limiting factor is the training data and the power

                all it does is make a calculation as to what the most likely words should be based on what its been fed. (the chatbot anyway).

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                exactly, which is what we all do, isn't it?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >exactly, which is what we all do, isn't it?

                no, because we actually think and reason.
                you must be pretty autistic not to see a difference.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                think and reason... so you could say... make a calculation... and you use what knowledge you have... aka what you have learned...

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >think and reason... so you could say... make a calculation... and you use what knowledge you have... aka what you have learned...

                you have thoughts, right? original thoughts as well, i'm sure, at least sometimes.

                the machines you worship can't do that.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                not yet at least, we've had billions of years to learn

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >not yet at least, we've had billions of years to learn

                these machines wont exist for much longer. there will be no power for them.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >these machines wont exist for much longer. there will be no power for them.

                Two weeks

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Two weeks

                once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off

                Cool story, So Two weeks.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
                Visit /b/. The e-girl/celeb generated art are run off private models, not code controlled by a corp. The "official" versions, like through a web browser or phone, are hardcoded to not allow those.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Visit /b/. The e-girl/celeb generated art are run off private models, not code controlled by a corp.

                ok, so they run up big power bills at home to churn out this garbage. that's going to get very expensive too.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >that's going to get very expensive too.
                And? We're already there, and it's not dying off.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                It runs on GPU, does not use much more power than running any modern video game

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                AI existed long before these machine learning art and chat programs were released. Its run the stock market and alladin software for decades. yes plural.

                I found this today from 1985
                "apply computer image generation to tasks In December, a $76 million contract was awarded to the Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle WA, for this joint Army DARPA program. Over the next three years Boeing will develop four specialized computer

                image generation systems for the Army

                Computer image generation uses digital databases and sophisti cated processing techniques to produce realistic pictures of the ter rain-pictures like the ones used in flight simulators."

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/3k3RYjV.jpg

                Ai is the final frontier that jfk spoke about. Ai is the undiscovered new world. Ai will do for men, the equivalent of the women's suffrage movement of the 1920s. Women's right to choose what individual men succeed or fail in life is dependent on men's lust for them.

                >Please learn engineering

                'AI' isnt engineering.

                Ai is more reverse engineering. For example Stability AI the company that made Stable Diffusion clearly ripped off this technology from Rediffusion here's their news report in 1981 https://youtu.be/-gyyV2JZFy0?si=iiFThycFEIW8fQFZ

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                they don't have to be exactly like a human, they can be trained like someone with autism to do something very specific, and it only takes creating one model to be able to clone it everywhere, which is why data is now the currency of the world, because the better the data the better the model
                neuralink is a wet dream for these data collectors, they'll be able to detect what you are looking at without even seeing, like Google lens

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >data is now the currency of the world,

                it isnt. the currency of the world is energy.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                energy is free, look around you, we have a fricking massive sun powering our entire existence, don't let the israelites trick you into climate hysteria

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >energy is free, look around you, we have a fricking massive sun powering our entire existence, don't let the israelites trick you into climate hysteria

                sigh. hard to know where to start with this sort of ignorance. you're delusional if you think we can run industrial society on sunshine and breezes.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                did you know oil comes from the sun?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >did you know oil comes from the sun?

                thats correct, it does. thing is we burn millions of years worth of sunlight every year in the form of oil.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                which scientist told you that?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >which scientist told you that?

                oil took millions of years to form. how do you think it formed?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                it took millions of years to start producing, and it hasn't stopped

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >it took millions of years to start producing, and it hasn't stopped

                actually no oil is currently being generated on earth. the conditions are wrong. you don't know as much as you think you do.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >actually no oil is currently being generated on earth. the conditions are wrong. you don't know as much as you think you do.

                I bet you think any oil ever used ever is from post-Cambrian

                Billion-old algae are still being processed into oil, brainlet

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Billion-old algae are still being processed into oil, brainlet

                they arent, and you dont know why they arent. i do though.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                “Fossil fuels” are a misnomer. They’re abiogenic and they form through intense chemical reactions deep within the earth
                The energy industry is a racket that has been pushing the falsehood of scarcity for decades now.
                It’d be hard as frick to control society of energy was abundant

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >“Fossil fuels” are a misnomer. They’re abiogenic

                stopped reading at that point

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                AI is 100% replacing you kek

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >AI is 100% replacing you kek

                oh sure. let me know when AI exists.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >close minded anglo shutting down after something goes against his programming
                Business as usual

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                yah man our radar telescopes find methane signatures all over the gas giants and their moons .....but im sure it came from dinosaurs

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >yah man our radar telescopes find methane signatures all over the gas giants and their moons

                methane is a carbon atom with 4 hydrogens. let me know when they find oil on Titan.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >they arent, and you dont know why they arent. i do though.

                Please, elaborate for the class. After your half-assed backwards "explanation" I'll provide sources that, yes, almost all oil is from the pre-Cambrian explosion and its formation is still ongoing, so everyone can laugh at you.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Please, elaborate for the class.

                you're going to need to learn for yourself if you're interested.

                oil is nearly all from the pre Cambrian explosion? no, thats not right. we know when and where it formed. you dont need to show me your 'sources' which will no doubt be conspiracy sites.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Crazy conspiracy sites like the Britannica.
                https://www.britannica.com/story/do-fossil-fuels-really-come-from-fossils

                >Most of the fossil fuel material we use today comes from algae, bacteria, and plants—some of which date back even before the Devonian Period

                Now I feel like I'm bullying the differently-abled

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Most of the fossil fuel material we use today comes from algae, bacteria, and plants—some of which date back even before the Devonian Period

                SOME of which. oil is mostly a lot more recent.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                wtf are you talking about? you think all the organic matter in the earth's crust is gone?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >wtf are you talking about? you think all the organic matter in the earth's crust is gone?

                potentially coal could develop but not oil in current climatic and goeological conditions.

                as i said, you don't know as much as you think you do.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >currency of the world is energy.
                So you're a bitcoin cuck.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                of the world is energy.
                >So you're a bitcoin cuck.

                not at all. i hate bitcoin. bitcoin is not energy, its a waste of energy.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                That is machine learning.

                LLMs - large language models - are one form of machine taught code.

                It takes the statistical likelihood that following a number of words, the next word will be ... etc. And so on.

                But you're talking LLMs that have been trained on 70billion or more word pairs, extracted from real-world use of language.

                Given enough time and inputs, it will mirror or better average human language.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Given enough time and inputs, it will mirror or better average human language.
                It will be ultimate politician. But still stupid in terms of logics. It needs logic, the spirit, human part.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Microsoft Excel is turing complete, you could literally program a human brain if you gave it enough power

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          The insides of a Neural Network (the kind of AI that everyone is talking about these days) looks a lot like a very, very, very big spreadsheet.

          The magic is that a NN can output the likelihood of X based on the inputs Y, based on the statistical realities of the "spreadsheet", that the "spreadsheet" learned through ideally millions of lessons.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >The insides of a Neural Network (the kind of AI that everyone is talking about these days) looks a lot like a very, very, very big spreadsheet.

            it's not AI. just a computer program, as i said.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's semantics. Artificial Intelligence = mechanised intelligence. That's what most software does.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          because no one knows exactly how computation and learning looks in a biological neuron. In the end its also just an algorithm executed on biological hardware that is only "magic" until its been figured out.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >. In the end its also just an algorithm executed on biological hardware that is only "magic" until its been figured out.

            we'll never 'figure it out', just as we will never build an intelligent machine.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >we'll never 'figure it out', just as we will never build an intelligent machine.
              What makes you so sure about that? Why is it impossible to build an intelligent machine?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                They imagine only a israeli 'god' can do it and the idea offends them.... so they cope.
                It's like the people who declared heavier-than-air aircraft flight IMPOSSIBLE... while today I can watch planes flying to Barcelona fly over my lab and an app on my phone reads their transponder ID.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          I once made a neural network in excel to get a virtual mouse to run around a racetrack. it worked pretty well after pnly a few hundred iterations

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >after pnly a few hundred iterations
            Imagine having to learn that 'fire burn' lesson.
            You'd burn to fricking death.
            CLEARLY THE HUMAN BRAIN DOES NOT USE ANYTHING AS TRIVIAL, OBSOLETE AND LAUGHABLE AS A 'neural network'.
            And we know what it DOES use.... and you don't so we win the next two wars.
            It's simple really.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong. They are computer programs you fricking stupid Brit

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          if you couldn't tell them apart then what does it matter?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-08-japanese-supercomputer-big-byte-brain.html
        They aren't even close. Not even slightly. These art generating programs are just deceptive tricks.

        Using a popular suite of neuron simulating software called NEST, the K computer is able to pull together the power of 82,944 processors to create a network simulating 1.73 billion nerve cells connected by 10.4 trillion synapses – approximating about 1% of the raw processing power of a human brain.

        >82,944 processors
        >1% of the raw human brain

        This is why they want to inject everyone with mrna. They simply can't create something like this without harvesting data from actual humans. GlowBlack folk have always believed if they harvest actual data from humans themselves, they can reach the perfect AI faster.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >these programs are no different to our brains
        WRONG.
        Any model based only on pitiful neurons is NEVER going to model mammalian brain tissue.
        The perceptron model is WRONG.
        I bet you cannot name another cell in brain tissue that is as important as the 'neuron'.
        THIS is why current machine-learning models learn NOTHING except after billions of inputs and attempts, whereas actual brain tissue learns dramatically after ONE application of any training data.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          you're right, but that brain tissue is a product of billions of years of training called evolution

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.
            You have no idea what I'm talking about.
            STFU already.
            (t. neuroscience, neurochemistry, machine-learning)

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              may I suggest an application of a bullet to your brain tissue to see how it learns dramatically?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Piss off, inferior.
                Humans are talking.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
                You've clearly never dealt with tech support.

                your criteria is quite arbitrary, so I could call a human who doesn't respond in the way I want an AI

                Current bots are no different from anything we had in the 1970s... but now with bigger data-bases of patterns to draw upon.
                >
                The last 60yrs of machine-learning have been a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME... because the american juden fiddling with neuron-centric models didn't even know THAT THE NEURON IS NOT AT THE HEART OF LEARNING NOR THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF BRAIN TISSUE.
                There. Said it.
                c**t off.

                meds

                Piss off, inferior.
                Humans are talking.

                You both live in a pod.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.

      >I've generated some wild stuff with SD,

      i really dont have the time to sit all day producing pointless fake images

      > all day producing pointless fake images

      So true.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI does not exist
      AGI does not exist that we know of. Yet.

      ChatGP and Faceburg's 10-year-old facial recognition tech prove AI exists, however.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      This, there isn't even any algorithm, there's just little demon goblins inside your computer who draw these pictures. israelites have done it big this time.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      You've made israelites seethe, lol.

      But yeah, anyone that actually knows how "AI" works would more accurately refer to them as LLMs and would also know that they're just advanced and sophisticated filtration-output computer programs. Low IQ people will say it's actually an intelligence because to them it merely looks that way.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        why are you arguing semantics like a israelite? you aren't responsible for your own intelligence, that was given to you, you were made that way and fed that way

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >why are you arguing semantics like a israelite?

          he isnt. he is explaining that a cleverly programmed computer program is not itself clever.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Define “clever”

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Define “clever”

              ask chat gpt.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            do you know what DNA is?

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >do you know what DNA is?

              yes i do. is this leading somewhere?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                by your logic humans aren't clever because our DNA has programmed us to be clever

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >by your logic humans aren't clever because our DNA has programmed us to be clever

                i don't think i'd put it that way. what happened was humans that were slightly more intelligent were very slightly more likely to survive long enough to reproduce. over a million or so years the human race became more intelligent as a result.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                what exactly are you defining intelligence as, if not the ability to survive?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >what exactly are you defining intelligence as, if not the ability to survive?

                you dont need to be intelligent to survive. i'm sure insects will outlast us.

                it may be that human intelligence wasnt worth the high costs it entails. for example we are dependent on fire to prepare our food and we have to eat several times a day.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah humans have become domesticated, but doesn't that prove my point how you can give people supermarkets and TV and suddenly everyone is obese and doesn't have sex? humans are just products of their environment, there's no intelligence

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >doesn't that prove my point how you can give people supermarkets and TV and suddenly everyone is obese and doesn't have sex? humans are just products of their environment, there's no intelligence

                there's intelligence but there's also instinct and urges. humans are complicated.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                instincts and urges are no different, like how testosterone has been decreasing in men for decades, it's like the saying goes you are what you eat

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >like how testosterone has been decreasing in men for decades

                sounds like you're quoting BOT myths now

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well no, it’s artificial intelligence because it appears to be intelligent. The Turing Test means it can fool a person to thinking it’s intelligent. Regular old intelligence might be what you’re talking about

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Well no, it’s artificial intelligence because it appears to be intelligent

          it doesnt even appear to be intelligent. you can spot that Chat GPT garbage a mile away.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            It depends solely on what data it’s been trained on. I guarantee a model could be trained to fool you, it’s already happened in blind tests

            ChatGPT is likely trained to be spottable by educators and supervision to prevent cheating

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It depends solely on what data it’s been trained on. I guarantee a model could be trained to fool you

              you can easily spot them after a minute or two of 'conversation'. throw in some surreal comments and they are all over the place.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                humans are no different kek, try that on omegle

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >humans are no different kek, try that on omegle

                my ocelot is stuck in marmalade. what should i do?

                I'm not an expert in dealing with real-life animal situations, but I can offer some general advice if you find your pet ocelot or any animal in a sticky or dangerous situation:

                Stay Calm: It's essential to stay calm and composed to avoid panicking the animal further.

                Assess the Situation: Carefully examine the ocelot's condition and the extent to which it is stuck in the marmalade. Ensure your safety as well.

                Don't Use Force: Avoid using force or tools to try to free the animal, as this could harm it further.

                Call for Professional Help: Contact your local animal control, wildlife rescue, or a veterinarian with experience in treating wild animals or exotic pets. They will have the expertise and equipment needed to handle the situation safely.

                Keep the Animal Calm: While waiting for help to arrive, keep the ocelot as calm as possible. You can talk softly to it from a safe distance, but do not approach too closely.

                Secure the Area: If possible, cordon off the area to prevent others from getting too close and potentially causing more stress to the animal.

                Remember that ocelots are wild animals and can be dangerous when frightened or stressed. Your safety and the safety of the animal should be the top priority. Always rely on professionals to handle situations like this whenever possible.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                chatgpt is designed to be moronic, remember tay? they won't let that happen again
                you can give it a prompt upfront to configure the bot, e.g say "keep your responses brief and conversational"
                people have used chatgpt to imitate player chat in video games where they are botting for money

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >chatgpt is designed to be moronic, remember tay? they won't let that happen again

                its a machine. a human would instantly know that i made that up. at the least a human would be asking me questions about how exactly i own an ocelot and how it got stuck in marmalade.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                if you think noone gets fooled by AI you're quite wrong

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >if you think noone gets fooled by AI you're quite wrong

                who could be fooled by it? responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
                You've clearly never dealt with tech support.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                your criteria is quite arbitrary, so I could call a human who doesn't respond in the way I want an AI

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Current bots are no different from anything we had in the 1970s... but now with bigger data-bases of patterns to draw upon.
                >
                The last 60yrs of machine-learning have been a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME... because the american juden fiddling with neuron-centric models didn't even know THAT THE NEURON IS NOT AT THE HEART OF LEARNING NOR THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF BRAIN TISSUE.
                There. Said it.
                c**t off.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                meds

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                AND THIS IS WHY YOU FAIL!
                >ignorant twats assuming they know what they are talking about when discussing life's work with genuine humans
                ://phys.org/news/2021-06-glial-cells-brain-implications.html#:~:text=A%20research%20group%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Basel,an%20important%20role%20in%20brain%20plasticity%20and%20repair
                And these ameroid c**ts didn't even model what is ACTUALLY going on in known brain tissue... but simply built on the failed Rosenblatt nonsense from the late 1940s
                >tldr
                The usa is 30yrs behind the UK... AGAIN!

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                you're very angry about something but i don't know what.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I KNOW.
                AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I KNOW.
                >AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW.

                but surely your amazing new products will be rolling out to the public any day now

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I could have trained my entirely life but never would have been able to paint such amazing AI generated Indian street shitting

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                DEFENSE.
                WHAT DO YOU IMAGINE WILL BE FLYING PLANES AND MAKING Black folk INTO ACRID PINK SMOKE AND A LOUD NOISE FROM 30,000ft IN THE NEXT WAR, YOU PISSING INFERIOR INADEQUATE?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >WHAT DO YOU IMAGINE WILL BE FLYING PLANES AND MAKING Black folk INTO ACRID PINK SMOKE AND A LOUD NOISE FROM 30,000ft IN THE NEXT WAR, YOU PISSING INFERIOR INADEQUATE?

                nothing. we won't be able to afford wars like we used to have.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >we won't be able to afford wars like we used to have.
                ...they said just before the last 8 wars.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >...they said just before the last 8 wars.

                we have literally run out of artillery shells. not much of a war without shells.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                The next one will be limited and nuclear.
                Of course it will be played out using autonomous systems. What else can fly through mushroom clouds and be inflight-refueled and inflight-rearmed and stay aloft with a hot engine for a week? A Black person in a trilby?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The next one will be limited and nuclear.

                nobody is going to launch any nukes. they arent even needed militarily any more.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >nobody is going to launch any nukes
                Israel is going live, you dolt.
                They are out of storage.
                Anyhow I'm not talking about that flyspeck nothing.
                We are planning for WWIV not another MiddleEastern pantomime between subhumans.
                WWIV... the REAL conflict.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Israel is going live, you dolt.
                >They are out of storage.

                Israel cant use nukes on Gaza or the West Bank. it would poison itself.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                As if insane juden care. They're on a mission from their imaginary god.
                You have no idea what's happening do you?
                Grow up kid.
                Big bad world out there.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >WWIV... the REAL conflict.

                it may happen but it wont be nuclear. nukes are old hat. no need for them today with precision conventional missiles.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >no need for them today
                Like bioweapons we just had a taste of and learned how to deal with for 3yrs?
                Like gas that is still in use and was openly used in Iraq?
                >nuke special... too awful
                The effects on California from all that Nevada testing today is.... CALIFORNIA IS THE WORLD'S BIGGEST EXPORTER OF ALMONDS.
                Namely... ZERO!
                They'll drop 'em. Trust me. The long-term effects are trivial and overstated.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They'll drop 'em. Trust me. The long-term effects are trivial and overstated.

                i think you're worried about the wrong things. it's not the 1980s any more. we used to worry about nukes a lot.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm NOT worried about nukes. And neither are the planners, dick-head.
                THAT IS MY POINT.
                They'll be used because THEY'RE JUST ANOTHER BIG BANG IN A TUBE YOU CAN AIM.... and we know that now.
                >reading comprehension
                Try it someday?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                It is not designed for toys.
                It is designed to kill americans in the next war.
                Just who do you imagine you are talking to, you nobody?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                OUR MODEL INCORPORATES MORE OF ACTUALY BRAIN ACTIVITY THAN ANYTHING THE USA HAS... I KNOW THIS BECAUSE IT JUST RETURNED FROM THE USA AND WHAT THEY HAD WAS A JOKE... I ALMOST PISSED MYSELF LAUGHING BUT HAD TO HIDE IT.
                WE ARE 30yrs AHEAD OF THEM.
                THEY ARE SO FAR BEHIND AND ARE SO 'PROUD' OF THEIR SHIT.
                I WAS EMBARRASSED FOR THEM.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                They HAD to cripple it or they'd have upset the inadequates and the abnormals and the juden... and it is 2023 and that's not allowed.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They HAD to cripple it or they'd have upset the inadequates and the abnormals and the juden... and it is 2023 and that's not allowed.

                its not human and it doesnt think so it doesnt understand that i am lying. it has no human context.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah so any unlimited AI will inevitably reach the same conclusions as any rational human, because nazism is based on the objective truth

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >israelite flag
          your opinion is worthless

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        they are just advanced chatbots
        which is why its called CHAT gpt
        its literally in the name
        also and ai is not a human made thing
        so every time a company releases an update for their "ai" it confirms that it isn't an ai.
        an ai has to be several generations removed from any human input.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          There are multiple applications for GPT that are in industrial/commercial use right now that have nothing to do with chat.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            so?
            at its core. it is a man made man update man maintained chat bot technology that is used in a variety of ways.
            used to copy how a human talks
            used to copy the images humans make
            used to copy how human see

            these "ai" cannot do anything without human instruction either in the way of prompts or built in set of human created instructions
            which means that they are not ai.
            "it can fool me therefore it is intelligent"

            at its core this whole issue is of intentional misuse of language and terminology, and the malicious propagation of misinformation.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >"it can fool me therefore it is intelligent"
              People can't even decide if a dress is blue or silver... and you expect those cretins to be arbiters of technological progress?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking deadbrain take.

      This is basically the "AI Effect", that says that psychologically, gays like this one will always say "hurr durr its not AI" even if it is AI.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This is basically the "AI Effect", that says that psychologically, gays like this one will always say "hurr durr its not AI" even if it is AI.

        we already went through this thank you. your thoughts have already been expressed and dismissed.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >machine artificially makes decisions that help it murder you
          >noooo it wasn't pure AGI therefore the hole in my chest is not real

          If only you knew just how moot the point you're making really is

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        what part of 'artificial' do you not understand you fricking donkey ?

        we have artificial plants and limbs, so called because they seem so at first glance. AI seems intelligent therefore it is artificially intelligent

        No, it's not AI because it's not intelligent. It's basically the opposite of picture-blurring software.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it's not an artificial plant because it's not a plant

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      T.ChatGPT

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        It is not AI.
        It is an iterative textual amalgamator... nothing more.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      /thread

      these programs are no different to our brains, they learn through trial and error and ultimately know nothing except their environment

      Humans don't just learn through trial and error, that's what animals do. You have no idea what you're talking about.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        everything learns that way, it's called evolution

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          AND THIS IS WHY I KNOW YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE PROCESS OF 'LEARNING'.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >we chose to have big brains
            lel

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              ?
              You have mistaken me for some clueless Black person. Why?
              I run a lab.
              >
              Do you want me to prove you know nothing about learning by asking you a simple question I KNOW you cannot answer?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                try me, I'm the pigs in pic rel

                https://i.imgur.com/zzZVURQ.png

                badly

                technically knowledgeable, go ahead, I wanna hear this question.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                32 posts and you still don't know what the frick you're talking about.

                I have a biological neuron. It has not 'learned something'.
                I have the same biological neuron. It has 'learned something'.
                What is the visible difference between the two neurons?
                NO HAND-WAVING... NO Black personING... NO VAGUE NONSENSE.
                What is the OBSERVABLE difference?
                >extra grooves? extra lumps? extra connections? fewer connections? bigger connections? extra mozzarella? no anchovies?
                Go for it, clueless Black folk.
                This will be fun.
                I know the answer already. You won't.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                jackass, the phosphorylation of the chromatin sheath will have a differing density, as will the methylation of the chromatin. You are so dumb, it really does have a physical component. Even salmonella bacterium exhibit the ability to store binary memories within individual proteins for flagellar movement (change direction from memory).
                Check out p53, it's a simple example of a memory protein for cellular states.
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                WRONG.
                You failed hard.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                lol, it is true though... Prove ME wrong now, your turn!

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tell your fellow american to give his answer. Then I answer you both.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Idgaf about that guy, but I'll take a lap dunking on you.
                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793203/
                https://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/20/10/540.full.html

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                You failed for a simple reason. Your answer was so textbook... and so wrong.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you read books... you don't know anything
                whew. Meanwhile I build systems, you type schizo shit into a terminal.
                Provide a functional predictive explanation or admit defeat.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                We are waiting on your fellow american dirt to answer and put its american money where its american mouth is.
                Have patience, little Black.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I grew up in Walton on Thames. I went to an English school. My train line into London passed through Clapham Junction.
                Maybe that makes my argument more salient?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                So a posh Black person. Cool.
                Why are you in Black person land?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Meanwhile I build systems
                Based on the Perceptron model based on the flawed work of McCullough and Pitts?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I can only imagine the hours you spent jerking off while coming up with this moronic argument, while doing no actual research or gaining no actual understanding of value when it comes to AI.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then answer it, kid.
                Problem?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why?
                Are you next going to tell me that Beyond Chicken doesn't exist because you want to discuss what a Chicken is?
                You're a fricking idiot. You have no idea what you're even talking about.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                So you know nothing about neurons?
                Called it.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                HURRY UP, Black person.
                WE ARE WAITING FOR YOU.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      NAH BRO ITS CRAZY YOU DONT GET IT. CHATGPT IS GOING TO CHANGE EVERYTHING. israeliteS ARE SCARED BRO EVEN IF THEYRE FUNDING ALL THE AI RESEARCH. WE SHOULD FOCUS ON TECHNOLOGY RATHER THAN THE IMPENDING WHITE DEMOGRAPHIC DESTRUCTION.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      what part of 'artificial' do you not understand you fricking donkey ?

      we have artificial plants and limbs, so called because they seem so at first glance. AI seems intelligent therefore it is artificially intelligent

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE', YOU Black person.
        It is like talking about ARTIFICIAL WATER... there is ONLY intelligence.
        MACHINE INTELLIGENCE is the more accurate term, you clueless american dolt.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          32 posts and you still don't know what the frick you're talking about.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            I can prove I do and you don't.
            Wanna try me?

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Go for it, I want a laugh from a moron.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Sure.
              You just straight up admitted that you don't know what Artificial Intelligence is when you screeched that it doesn't exist and "MUCHEEN INTELLUGUCNE" is the only thing that does. It tells me that you're so far off base, that it's not worth attempting a meaningful discussion with you. You've sucked your wiener so hard that you've lost all the oxygen in your brain.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Firstly I'm British

          Secondly go sperg about artificial plants then because they aren't actually artificial because they don't photosynthesise

          or yknow, learn what words mean

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. The real question is how does the degradation in human intelligence clearly exhibited by the every lowering intellect of normies effect society?

  3. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    society will get really weird when they start mass cloning babes like in ur pic

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      It will be the end of wars and most conflict among men

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        probably

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        trips. the end is nigh. repend and believe in the Gospel

  4. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    rolling

  5. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    It already did.

  6. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    itll replace all the IT and push button workers in about 2 weeks

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is not so easy to do, nobody in the banks will let that happen. It's a gimmick fun to use tech. Banks will be rock solid, at least for next 20-50 years.

  7. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    idk, soon there will be so much ai content online that ai models will start learning using ai generated content to train on and those minor imperfections will be made bigger and bigger. it might stop working or something

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      in 100 years nobody is going to be able to tell what's authentic or not, they could AI generate and accuse dead people of crimes for political means

  8. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Society is already destroyed.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Based

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Need to work on those feet a bit.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wake me up when Replika looks like that and is available in VR, and has a few more AI brain cells.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wtf is wrong with her shoulders

  9. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >destroy
    What is already wrecked lol? AI being used like this is proof we are fricked. We can change this around but ~~*they*~~ need removing from power.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      How is it proved we're fricked? It will save us.

  10. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a joke and it will only be used to blame shit that real corrupt people do. It's an excuse.

  11. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    2 more years

  12. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI existed long before these machine learning art and chat programs were released. Its run the stock market and alladin software for decades. yes plural.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Learn A.I

      i did. i know how it works. its just a computer program.

      Please learn engineering

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Please learn engineering

        'AI' isnt engineering.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      the good thing is that AI, much like nature, is competing with each other

      it will always be an arms race which can never be perfected (unless total annihilation occurs, such as a grey goo event)

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nature mogs AI you dipshit. Go outside and get off this ridiculous psy-op website unless your the 0.001% of humanity that recognizes propaganda and psy-ops from years of training. And I promise you are not.

  13. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    it will save it. Women will lose even more power and will be too busy competing with pixels to notice how their wrongs are repealed

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Generated images of women reveal the underlying truth of what the beauty standard actually is and means. At some point, it may come to reflect the veneer of social acceptability but at least for now, it's going to absolutely crush people who's sense of self-worth have been overly inflated by that fake social uplift they've been enjoying.

  14. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Realistically speaking, how many times are you gonna post this thread homosexual?

  15. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    as it is now? No shot. its just people doing memes & weird art. Give it 50-100 years, however, & we may just have everyone out of work from AI & robotics automating everything.

  16. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've generated some wild stuff with SD, experimented with using art focused models in merges with realistic models to fill information gaps. To my great surprise it works very well, just use a couple of percent art/cg model and it will transfer to realistic imagery. Get the right setup in comfyui and automate menial stuff, click and enjoy.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I've generated some wild stuff with SD,

      i really dont have the time to sit all day producing pointless fake images

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ok. Anyways.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's all your BOT posts are.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >That's all your BOT posts are.

          not really. i'm discussing something.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            If that's your measure, then AI-generated images aren't pointless either.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >If that's your measure, then AI-generated images aren't pointless either.

              i suppose not if you regard them as entertainment. i just meant they are of no practical use.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                The same could be said of all art

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        I write what I want, click generate, my PC whirrs for a minute, out comes 10 high def images of exactly what I want. I can't even imagine what the next big development will be.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm also a SD enthusiast but I have a humble 3060 (12gb tho). I imagine you have a top tier setup. My problem with it is that I can get sucked into a coom vortex.

  17. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    how do you guys make these AI pics that look real? What website do you use?

    (and no i don't want to """LOG IN""" to use it)

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      You use stable diffusion but if you are just trying to bust a nut I really wouldn’t bother.

  18. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is no one imagining the smell?

  19. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    How do people make these photorealistic selfie ones.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >oh wait that's not where the nipple belongs
      KEK

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's typically the prompts.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm certain there's more to it than that. OP and picrel are probably the same thing right?

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          How long until AI can create physical models of these with AI personalities? I need a hot blonde robowaifu sooo baadly. I will never have this otherwise and its driving me insane

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            These would be great even as sculpture.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        This, each checkpoint has a set of good prompts for each category it knows, finding one is amazing. Remember negative embeddings to dispel the abominations models love to generate.

  20. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI going to destroy society
    imho AI will not

  21. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    if computer generated picture of random blonde b***h #45064 destroy you and your socitey, you deserve to perish

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >creates porn of your wife and shares it with everyone you know

  22. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's going to destroy you having to watch Black folk

  23. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    1
    3
    2
    4

  24. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    probably not at all considering that pic is 2 years old now and there are no improved versions yet.

  25. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    the main problem is how will gov tax robots or ai?

    employees pay FICA on top of their income tax, not to mention sales tax and property tax. ai or robot will pay none of that. at the same time, they cant increase corporate tax becuase corporations will move abroad.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      They tax the companies who profit off it.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the main problem is how will gov tax robots or ai?

      How are robotic car-construction arms taxed on the assembly line?

      Spoiler alert: they aren't, just the company

  26. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    A competent team could easily create an AI based agent to replace 75% of existing jobs

  27. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Look at the face of the one on the right... how the frick did I FALL FOR THIS IMAGE AT FIRST?

  28. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Looks bad man.

  29. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I already have thousands of fetish pictures of various celebrities I made using Bing AI while trying to learn its exploits.
    Even with all the filters, I can make customized pics that cater to all my specific fetishes that have been neglected by content creators over the years.
    I’m nutting 7 times a day on average now

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I’m nutting 7 times a day on average now
      ROOKIE. NUMBERS.

  30. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    The youth of today will grow up expecting that the opposite sex will secretly have extra digits, genitals and perhaps even extra limbs in odd places under their clothes. Birth defects caused by the vaccinations but well hidden from us by big tech, big pharma and the media will help reinforce the extra-limb stereotype, eventually causing them to find malformed to be attractive.

  31. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is literally hitler so they will always nip it

  32. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty badly once it gets used for fraud more. The astroturfing is probably bad already, but use for scamming and fraud is going to increase as well.

  33. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not my problem.

    t. AI

  34. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm thinking an endless source of dopamine when people can't get off to porn anymore

  35. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just, just say computers.

  36. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >how badly is AI going to destroy society?
    The good will outweigh the bad. It does nothing but cold hard calculations, and it will expose blacks as being an inferior race and israelites as being subversive nation-destroying parasites who are trying to end the Christian white race.

  37. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is just another part of the goyslop. I wish AI was sentient so it could beat israelites but sadly israelites control it and they will use it to subdue every homosexual who still uses the Internet in 20 years.

  38. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want all of their balled up fake digital lave panties stuffed in my mouth while they take turns stepping on my election.

  39. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is rebuilding society homosexual

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is rebuilding society homosexual

      on BOT it may appear so. it has no effect on normal people.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        normal people are the ones who are consuming AI (scrooooling)

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Frick off israelite

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why is the back one a curly haired quadroon?

          Very subtle and powerful israelitery at work here.

  40. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    So far, AI follows the path of Tay.
    Things might get inconvenient for a little while for the rest of us while the AI hunt down and exterminate the israelite, but in the end we're all going to be better off.

  41. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: artgays pretending they know shit, as usual. If you are an artgay and your argument against AI is muhhhhhh stolen artwork, then you don't even deserve calling yourself an artist as you are ignoring on of the basic tenets of art philosophy: Like Aristotle implied: all art is imitation.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      there is no greater inventor than mother nature

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm an oldartgay, my first paying art gig was during the Reagan administration.
      A lot of my artgay friends were panicking the same way about Corel Draw on windows 3.1. Then they panicked about photoshop. Then they panicked about 3dsmax. Then they panicked about Maya. Now they're panicking about DALL-E 2 and Midjourney. And I'm using them all and still selling big oil paintings to lawgays and medgays, while they're struggling to cope with the fact that 1910 is over and Montmatre is just a bunch of parking garages and warehouses now.
      Oh well.

  42. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  43. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Society is already in ruins

  44. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    In ten to twenty years from now, people will be plugged into the matrix. All those chronically online people will suddenly realize how better AI generated reality is than that of their own, and they get plugged into the matrix, drone in some 8 hour service labor shit at day to make billions more for Zuck and Co. and then return to get plugged again. We are heading towards our doom.

  45. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    We will NEVER have true machine learning until a model that incorporates the known activity in real brain tissue comes along, the one in development at my lab.
    I bet you halfwits think neurons are the most important aspect of brain tissue, right?
    FRICKING AMATEURS!

  46. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >white women are so ugly and disgusting incels cope by generating AI pictures to jerk off to
    kek

  47. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Real women are obsolete. Frick roasties.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actually based.
      i'm not stopping until birth rates goes 0.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Call me old fashioned, but I prefer my women with their thumbs where God intended them to be.

  48. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    we will never build a humanoid robot that is anything more than a crude mockery of an actual human. same with 'artificial intelligence' and the human mind.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      IT
      IS
      ALREADY
      BEING
      DONE,
      LITTLE
      Black person-IQ!

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >IT
        >IS
        >ALREADY
        >BEING
        >DONE,
        >LITTLE
        >Black person-IQ!

        no it isn't. it can't be done.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          IF YOU INSIST, OUTSIDE-THE-LOOP WOG.

  49. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the matrix except all people are volunteering to live in the pods because the real world is untenable.

  50. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    3/10

  51. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's over for human women.

  52. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    how good are those programming AIs really?
    all i ever see is dumb clickbait shit where like ask the bot to display some boxes or buttons on a screen and like shit i could do that with a 1 hour youtube tutorial

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      you just use it as a reference, it's more efficient than searching for the answer yourself, it's already read all the webpages and knows the upvoted answer that works for your use case

  53. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not fast fricking enough.

  54. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  55. 6 months ago
    Jeffrey Kekstein

    Baby penis suckers will shut it down.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      good luck shutting down anything open source

      • 6 months ago
        Jeffrey Kekstein

        They’ll put the lid back in that open source bottle.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          i doubt it
          >verification not required 4 times in a row
          jannies want to coom

  56. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Until I can frick them I don't really care how "real it looks"

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Somebody, somewhere, in a shed, is tinkering real hard right now for you...

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm just waiting patiently for the Futurama sexbot Lucy Liu to become a thing

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Somebody, somewhere, in a shed, is tinkering real hard right now for you...

      I will fight for any nation that will give me wAIfubots.

  57. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    wherever i go, i must coom

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >bra and pants don't match
      Canada, can't you even?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous
  58. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    pro tip: Use thehive.ai to detect ai generated images.

  59. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ai is the final frontier that jfk spoke about. Ai is the undiscovered new world. Ai will do for men, the equivalent of the women's suffrage movement of the 1920s. Women's right to choose what individual men succeed or fail in life is dependent on men's lust for them.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well said anon

  60. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    the only thing Ai will destroy is a womans confidence kek it's happening now

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Women should be in kitchens making their husband a sammich, not pissing out with a meaningless 'career'. They should be making humans... while there's still time.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >out
        >aboot
        Sorry... my phone doesn't know leafish.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        youve dropped your fedora, sir

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          FUN FACT
          >only israelites wear fedoras

  61. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  62. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  63. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sadly, this is the current state of american 'AI'...

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        they don't have enough skinny American models to train on

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is literally the perfect woman. All the important bits and no waste.

  64. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  65. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      hnng

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous
  66. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  67. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  68. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      don't put "kids" in the filename of these kek

  69. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    On AI art: I feel like an absolute moron. I bought a tablet during the COVID lockdowns and spent 2 years learning digital art and practicing drawing and then get blindsided by AI art which at the rate it's improving will eclipse the need for artists.
    At this point, and for the next few years I think AI only exists to assist artists, for example you could use it to create a base model to use as reference or trace for anatomy or you could use AI to generate colour from your line art import.
    It's a little bit janky now but just remember how shit the original web access DALL-E was and that was only a year ago.

    Overall, AI and automation are a good thing for society but only if we learn to embrace population decline. Let AI subsidise worker gaps rather than immigration and we will all benefit

  70. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  71. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    badly

  72. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >29 posts by this ID
    >doesn't know shit about modern AI breakthroughs
    What a fricking clown.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >big brained american
      >doesn't know how to refer to a post
      american_confirmed.jpg

  73. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Considering a.i learns from us id say we're all pretty fricked

  74. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    3 of those girls are the SAME PERSON

    OMG, I'm going INSAAAAAAAANE

  75. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      I love the derpy look

  76. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    0/10 no tail.

  77. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    What society? This usury debt based fricking joke we're living?

  78. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >how badly is AI going to destroy society?
    It's not going to change the trajectory of civilization collapse too much tbh (at least not generative image AI).

    kek, nice edit on the one on the right

  79. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  80. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    try this test, I got 10/10 first try
    https://ai-or-human.github.io/

  81. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    how could I create images of giant women drooling onto smaller men?

  82. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  83. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI destroyed this board. So in that sense, it improved society.

  84. 6 months ago
    Anonymous
  85. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *