AI does not exist. A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.
AI is not what people think it is. It's just an algorithm. It has to be developed and customized, and for most businesses that is not work the 1-2 million dollars investment. So they'll purchase "platforms", programs which can do a few things well like route calls or answer simple questions via voice or text. It has to be trained so most places won't have the time, money or staff to do that.
Here's the reality: these types of systems have existed for 15 years or more. Call centers have been shut down all over the world and nothing has really changed except roasties can't get call center jobs anymore.
And if you're worried about automation, those tools have been around for a decade too. They're not able to do anything too complex without additional development, which most companies won't pay for. There's already low-code automation tools available, and they're expensive if you don't use something that already has an API integration.
Basically, corporate greed and complex business logic will prevent AI from taking over any time soon. You've got about 20 years before the next generation of AI detected-integrations are available. Nothing and I mean NOTHING is standardized so it isn't happening now.
have you worked in corporate? this is a problem even before AI, banking is running on 50 year old code
what's changed is now anyone with a gaming pc can do it and it's open sourced
Yes I worked for places like that, but where I'm at now is "cutting edge", and even we don't wanna pay millions to teach AI every damn use case we have for it. It isn't worth it until it's better and fast and doesn't need months of development for every single thing to work.
I would also amend this statement to say that if you do REAL work, and not some stupid content-creation or design nonsense that ChatGPT can already do, then you're fine. If you are a creator of some corporate slop, you should be breaking rocks for a living already and deserve whatever happens to you.
you have a bunch of nodes and they learn pattern recognition through brute forcing and using formulas to best predict the outcome given the input, so the limiting factor is the training data and the power
if it had 18 years to train, and had the same number of nodes as a human brain, and was subject to the same environment, it would in theory function no different
7 months ago
Anonymous
>you have a bunch of nodes and they learn pattern recognition through brute forcing and using formulas to best predict the outcome given the input, so the limiting factor is the training data and the power
all it does is make a calculation as to what the most likely words should be based on what its been fed. (the chatbot anyway).
7 months ago
Anonymous
exactly, which is what we all do, isn't it?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>exactly, which is what we all do, isn't it?
no, because we actually think and reason.
you must be pretty autistic not to see a difference.
7 months ago
Anonymous
think and reason... so you could say... make a calculation... and you use what knowledge you have... aka what you have learned...
7 months ago
Anonymous
>think and reason... so you could say... make a calculation... and you use what knowledge you have... aka what you have learned...
you have thoughts, right? original thoughts as well, i'm sure, at least sometimes.
the machines you worship can't do that.
7 months ago
Anonymous
not yet at least, we've had billions of years to learn
7 months ago
Anonymous
>not yet at least, we've had billions of years to learn
these machines wont exist for much longer. there will be no power for them.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>these machines wont exist for much longer. there will be no power for them.
Two weeks
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Two weeks
once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
7 months ago
Anonymous
>once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
Cool story, So Two weeks.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
Visit /b/. The e-girl/celeb generated art are run off private models, not code controlled by a corp. The "official" versions, like through a web browser or phone, are hardcoded to not allow those.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Visit /b/. The e-girl/celeb generated art are run off private models, not code controlled by a corp.
ok, so they run up big power bills at home to churn out this garbage. that's going to get very expensive too.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>that's going to get very expensive too.
And? We're already there, and it's not dying off.
7 months ago
Anonymous
It runs on GPU, does not use much more power than running any modern video game
7 months ago
Anonymous
AI existed long before these machine learning art and chat programs were released. Its run the stock market and alladin software for decades. yes plural.
I found this today from 1985
"apply computer image generation to tasks In December, a $76 million contract was awarded to the Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle WA, for this joint Army DARPA program. Over the next three years Boeing will develop four specialized computer
image generation systems for the Army
Computer image generation uses digital databases and sophisti cated processing techniques to produce realistic pictures of the ter rain-pictures like the ones used in flight simulators."
7 months ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/3k3RYjV.jpg
Ai is the final frontier that jfk spoke about. Ai is the undiscovered new world. Ai will do for men, the equivalent of the women's suffrage movement of the 1920s. Women's right to choose what individual men succeed or fail in life is dependent on men's lust for them.
>Please learn engineering
'AI' isnt engineering.
Ai is more reverse engineering. For example Stability AI the company that made Stable Diffusion clearly ripped off this technology from Rediffusion here's their news report in 1981 https://youtu.be/-gyyV2JZFy0?si=iiFThycFEIW8fQFZ
7 months ago
Anonymous
they don't have to be exactly like a human, they can be trained like someone with autism to do something very specific, and it only takes creating one model to be able to clone it everywhere, which is why data is now the currency of the world, because the better the data the better the model
neuralink is a wet dream for these data collectors, they'll be able to detect what you are looking at without even seeing, like Google lens
7 months ago
Anonymous
>data is now the currency of the world,
it isnt. the currency of the world is energy.
7 months ago
Anonymous
energy is free, look around you, we have a fricking massive sun powering our entire existence, don't let the israelites trick you into climate hysteria
7 months ago
Anonymous
>energy is free, look around you, we have a fricking massive sun powering our entire existence, don't let the israelites trick you into climate hysteria
sigh. hard to know where to start with this sort of ignorance. you're delusional if you think we can run industrial society on sunshine and breezes.
7 months ago
Anonymous
did you know oil comes from the sun?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>did you know oil comes from the sun?
thats correct, it does. thing is we burn millions of years worth of sunlight every year in the form of oil.
7 months ago
Anonymous
which scientist told you that?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>which scientist told you that?
oil took millions of years to form. how do you think it formed?
7 months ago
Anonymous
it took millions of years to start producing, and it hasn't stopped
7 months ago
Anonymous
>it took millions of years to start producing, and it hasn't stopped
actually no oil is currently being generated on earth. the conditions are wrong. you don't know as much as you think you do.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>actually no oil is currently being generated on earth. the conditions are wrong. you don't know as much as you think you do.
I bet you think any oil ever used ever is from post-Cambrian
Billion-old algae are still being processed into oil, brainlet
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Billion-old algae are still being processed into oil, brainlet
they arent, and you dont know why they arent. i do though.
7 months ago
Anonymous
“Fossil fuels” are a misnomer. They’re abiogenic and they form through intense chemical reactions deep within the earth
The energy industry is a racket that has been pushing the falsehood of scarcity for decades now.
It’d be hard as frick to control society of energy was abundant
7 months ago
Anonymous
>“Fossil fuels” are a misnomer. They’re abiogenic
stopped reading at that point
7 months ago
Anonymous
AI is 100% replacing you kek
7 months ago
Anonymous
>AI is 100% replacing you kek
oh sure. let me know when AI exists.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>close minded anglo shutting down after something goes against his programming
Business as usual
7 months ago
Anonymous
yah man our radar telescopes find methane signatures all over the gas giants and their moons .....but im sure it came from dinosaurs
7 months ago
Anonymous
>yah man our radar telescopes find methane signatures all over the gas giants and their moons
methane is a carbon atom with 4 hydrogens. let me know when they find oil on Titan.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>they arent, and you dont know why they arent. i do though.
Please, elaborate for the class. After your half-assed backwards "explanation" I'll provide sources that, yes, almost all oil is from the pre-Cambrian explosion and its formation is still ongoing, so everyone can laugh at you.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Please, elaborate for the class.
you're going to need to learn for yourself if you're interested.
oil is nearly all from the pre Cambrian explosion? no, thats not right. we know when and where it formed. you dont need to show me your 'sources' which will no doubt be conspiracy sites.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Crazy conspiracy sites like the Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/story/do-fossil-fuels-really-come-from-fossils
>Most of the fossil fuel material we use today comes from algae, bacteria, and plants—some of which date back even before the Devonian Period
Now I feel like I'm bullying the differently-abled
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Most of the fossil fuel material we use today comes from algae, bacteria, and plants—some of which date back even before the Devonian Period
SOME of which. oil is mostly a lot more recent.
7 months ago
Anonymous
wtf are you talking about? you think all the organic matter in the earth's crust is gone?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>wtf are you talking about? you think all the organic matter in the earth's crust is gone?
potentially coal could develop but not oil in current climatic and goeological conditions.
as i said, you don't know as much as you think you do.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>currency of the world is energy.
So you're a bitcoin cuck.
7 months ago
Anonymous
of the world is energy. >So you're a bitcoin cuck.
not at all. i hate bitcoin. bitcoin is not energy, its a waste of energy.
7 months ago
Anonymous
That is machine learning.
LLMs - large language models - are one form of machine taught code.
It takes the statistical likelihood that following a number of words, the next word will be ... etc. And so on.
But you're talking LLMs that have been trained on 70billion or more word pairs, extracted from real-world use of language.
Given enough time and inputs, it will mirror or better average human language.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Given enough time and inputs, it will mirror or better average human language.
It will be ultimate politician. But still stupid in terms of logics. It needs logic, the spirit, human part.
The insides of a Neural Network (the kind of AI that everyone is talking about these days) looks a lot like a very, very, very big spreadsheet.
The magic is that a NN can output the likelihood of X based on the inputs Y, based on the statistical realities of the "spreadsheet", that the "spreadsheet" learned through ideally millions of lessons.
because no one knows exactly how computation and learning looks in a biological neuron. In the end its also just an algorithm executed on biological hardware that is only "magic" until its been figured out.
>we'll never 'figure it out', just as we will never build an intelligent machine.
What makes you so sure about that? Why is it impossible to build an intelligent machine?
7 months ago
Anonymous
They imagine only a israeli 'god' can do it and the idea offends them.... so they cope.
It's like the people who declared heavier-than-air aircraft flight IMPOSSIBLE... while today I can watch planes flying to Barcelona fly over my lab and an app on my phone reads their transponder ID.
>after pnly a few hundred iterations
Imagine having to learn that 'fire burn' lesson.
You'd burn to fricking death.
CLEARLY THE HUMAN BRAIN DOES NOT USE ANYTHING AS TRIVIAL, OBSOLETE AND LAUGHABLE AS A 'neural network'.
And we know what it DOES use.... and you don't so we win the next two wars.
It's simple really.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-08-japanese-supercomputer-big-byte-brain.html
They aren't even close. Not even slightly. These art generating programs are just deceptive tricks.
Using a popular suite of neuron simulating software called NEST, the K computer is able to pull together the power of 82,944 processors to create a network simulating 1.73 billion nerve cells connected by 10.4 trillion synapses – approximating about 1% of the raw processing power of a human brain.
>82,944 processors >1% of the raw human brain
This is why they want to inject everyone with mrna. They simply can't create something like this without harvesting data from actual humans. GlowBlack folk have always believed if they harvest actual data from humans themselves, they can reach the perfect AI faster.
>these programs are no different to our brains
WRONG.
Any model based only on pitiful neurons is NEVER going to model mammalian brain tissue.
The perceptron model is WRONG.
I bet you cannot name another cell in brain tissue that is as important as the 'neuron'.
THIS is why current machine-learning models learn NOTHING except after billions of inputs and attempts, whereas actual brain tissue learns dramatically after ONE application of any training data.
may I suggest an application of a bullet to your brain tissue to see how it learns dramatically?
7 months ago
Anonymous
Piss off, inferior.
Humans are talking.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
You've clearly never dealt with tech support.
your criteria is quite arbitrary, so I could call a human who doesn't respond in the way I want an AI
Current bots are no different from anything we had in the 1970s... but now with bigger data-bases of patterns to draw upon. >
The last 60yrs of machine-learning have been a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME... because the american juden fiddling with neuron-centric models didn't even know THAT THE NEURON IS NOT AT THE HEART OF LEARNING NOR THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF BRAIN TISSUE.
There. Said it.
c**t off.
This, there isn't even any algorithm, there's just little demon goblins inside your computer who draw these pictures. israelites have done it big this time.
But yeah, anyone that actually knows how "AI" works would more accurately refer to them as LLMs and would also know that they're just advanced and sophisticated filtration-output computer programs. Low IQ people will say it's actually an intelligence because to them it merely looks that way.
why are you arguing semantics like a israelite? you aren't responsible for your own intelligence, that was given to you, you were made that way and fed that way
by your logic humans aren't clever because our DNA has programmed us to be clever
7 months ago
Anonymous
>by your logic humans aren't clever because our DNA has programmed us to be clever
i don't think i'd put it that way. what happened was humans that were slightly more intelligent were very slightly more likely to survive long enough to reproduce. over a million or so years the human race became more intelligent as a result.
7 months ago
Anonymous
what exactly are you defining intelligence as, if not the ability to survive?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>what exactly are you defining intelligence as, if not the ability to survive?
you dont need to be intelligent to survive. i'm sure insects will outlast us.
it may be that human intelligence wasnt worth the high costs it entails. for example we are dependent on fire to prepare our food and we have to eat several times a day.
7 months ago
Anonymous
yeah humans have become domesticated, but doesn't that prove my point how you can give people supermarkets and TV and suddenly everyone is obese and doesn't have sex? humans are just products of their environment, there's no intelligence
7 months ago
Anonymous
>doesn't that prove my point how you can give people supermarkets and TV and suddenly everyone is obese and doesn't have sex? humans are just products of their environment, there's no intelligence
there's intelligence but there's also instinct and urges. humans are complicated.
7 months ago
Anonymous
instincts and urges are no different, like how testosterone has been decreasing in men for decades, it's like the saying goes you are what you eat
7 months ago
Anonymous
>like how testosterone has been decreasing in men for decades
Well no, it’s artificial intelligence because it appears to be intelligent. The Turing Test means it can fool a person to thinking it’s intelligent. Regular old intelligence might be what you’re talking about
>It depends solely on what data it’s been trained on. I guarantee a model could be trained to fool you
you can easily spot them after a minute or two of 'conversation'. throw in some surreal comments and they are all over the place.
7 months ago
Anonymous
humans are no different kek, try that on omegle
7 months ago
Anonymous
>humans are no different kek, try that on omegle
my ocelot is stuck in marmalade. what should i do?
I'm not an expert in dealing with real-life animal situations, but I can offer some general advice if you find your pet ocelot or any animal in a sticky or dangerous situation:
Stay Calm: It's essential to stay calm and composed to avoid panicking the animal further.
Assess the Situation: Carefully examine the ocelot's condition and the extent to which it is stuck in the marmalade. Ensure your safety as well.
Don't Use Force: Avoid using force or tools to try to free the animal, as this could harm it further.
Call for Professional Help: Contact your local animal control, wildlife rescue, or a veterinarian with experience in treating wild animals or exotic pets. They will have the expertise and equipment needed to handle the situation safely.
Keep the Animal Calm: While waiting for help to arrive, keep the ocelot as calm as possible. You can talk softly to it from a safe distance, but do not approach too closely.
Secure the Area: If possible, cordon off the area to prevent others from getting too close and potentially causing more stress to the animal.
Remember that ocelots are wild animals and can be dangerous when frightened or stressed. Your safety and the safety of the animal should be the top priority. Always rely on professionals to handle situations like this whenever possible.
7 months ago
Anonymous
chatgpt is designed to be moronic, remember tay? they won't let that happen again
you can give it a prompt upfront to configure the bot, e.g say "keep your responses brief and conversational"
people have used chatgpt to imitate player chat in video games where they are botting for money
7 months ago
Anonymous
>chatgpt is designed to be moronic, remember tay? they won't let that happen again
its a machine. a human would instantly know that i made that up. at the least a human would be asking me questions about how exactly i own an ocelot and how it got stuck in marmalade.
7 months ago
Anonymous
if you think noone gets fooled by AI you're quite wrong
7 months ago
Anonymous
>if you think noone gets fooled by AI you're quite wrong
who could be fooled by it? responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
7 months ago
Anonymous
>responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
You've clearly never dealt with tech support.
7 months ago
Anonymous
your criteria is quite arbitrary, so I could call a human who doesn't respond in the way I want an AI
7 months ago
Anonymous
Current bots are no different from anything we had in the 1970s... but now with bigger data-bases of patterns to draw upon. >
The last 60yrs of machine-learning have been a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME... because the american juden fiddling with neuron-centric models didn't even know THAT THE NEURON IS NOT AT THE HEART OF LEARNING NOR THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF BRAIN TISSUE.
There. Said it.
c**t off.
7 months ago
Anonymous
meds
7 months ago
Anonymous
AND THIS IS WHY YOU FAIL! >ignorant twats assuming they know what they are talking about when discussing life's work with genuine humans
://phys.org/news/2021-06-glial-cells-brain-implications.html#:~:text=A%20research%20group%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Basel,an%20important%20role%20in%20brain%20plasticity%20and%20repair
And these ameroid c**ts didn't even model what is ACTUALLY going on in known brain tissue... but simply built on the failed Rosenblatt nonsense from the late 1940s >tldr
The usa is 30yrs behind the UK... AGAIN!
7 months ago
Anonymous
you're very angry about something but i don't know what.
7 months ago
Anonymous
I KNOW.
AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>I KNOW. >AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW.
but surely your amazing new products will be rolling out to the public any day now
7 months ago
Anonymous
I could have trained my entirely life but never would have been able to paint such amazing AI generated Indian street shitting
7 months ago
Anonymous
DEFENSE.
WHAT DO YOU IMAGINE WILL BE FLYING PLANES AND MAKING Black folk INTO ACRID PINK SMOKE AND A LOUD NOISE FROM 30,000ft IN THE NEXT WAR, YOU PISSING INFERIOR INADEQUATE?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>WHAT DO YOU IMAGINE WILL BE FLYING PLANES AND MAKING Black folk INTO ACRID PINK SMOKE AND A LOUD NOISE FROM 30,000ft IN THE NEXT WAR, YOU PISSING INFERIOR INADEQUATE?
nothing. we won't be able to afford wars like we used to have.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>we won't be able to afford wars like we used to have.
...they said just before the last 8 wars.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>...they said just before the last 8 wars.
we have literally run out of artillery shells. not much of a war without shells.
7 months ago
Anonymous
The next one will be limited and nuclear.
Of course it will be played out using autonomous systems. What else can fly through mushroom clouds and be inflight-refueled and inflight-rearmed and stay aloft with a hot engine for a week? A Black person in a trilby?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>The next one will be limited and nuclear.
nobody is going to launch any nukes. they arent even needed militarily any more.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>nobody is going to launch any nukes
Israel is going live, you dolt.
They are out of storage.
Anyhow I'm not talking about that flyspeck nothing.
We are planning for WWIV not another MiddleEastern pantomime between subhumans.
WWIV... the REAL conflict.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Israel is going live, you dolt. >They are out of storage.
Israel cant use nukes on Gaza or the West Bank. it would poison itself.
7 months ago
Anonymous
As if insane juden care. They're on a mission from their imaginary god.
You have no idea what's happening do you?
Grow up kid.
Big bad world out there.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>WWIV... the REAL conflict.
it may happen but it wont be nuclear. nukes are old hat. no need for them today with precision conventional missiles.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>no need for them today
Like bioweapons we just had a taste of and learned how to deal with for 3yrs?
Like gas that is still in use and was openly used in Iraq? >nuke special... too awful
The effects on California from all that Nevada testing today is.... CALIFORNIA IS THE WORLD'S BIGGEST EXPORTER OF ALMONDS.
Namely... ZERO!
They'll drop 'em. Trust me. The long-term effects are trivial and overstated.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>They'll drop 'em. Trust me. The long-term effects are trivial and overstated.
i think you're worried about the wrong things. it's not the 1980s any more. we used to worry about nukes a lot.
7 months ago
Anonymous
I'm NOT worried about nukes. And neither are the planners, dick-head.
THAT IS MY POINT.
They'll be used because THEY'RE JUST ANOTHER BIG BANG IN A TUBE YOU CAN AIM.... and we know that now. >reading comprehension
Try it someday?
7 months ago
Anonymous
It is not designed for toys.
It is designed to kill americans in the next war.
Just who do you imagine you are talking to, you nobody?
7 months ago
Anonymous
OUR MODEL INCORPORATES MORE OF ACTUALY BRAIN ACTIVITY THAN ANYTHING THE USA HAS... I KNOW THIS BECAUSE IT JUST RETURNED FROM THE USA AND WHAT THEY HAD WAS A JOKE... I ALMOST PISSED MYSELF LAUGHING BUT HAD TO HIDE IT.
WE ARE 30yrs AHEAD OF THEM.
THEY ARE SO FAR BEHIND AND ARE SO 'PROUD' OF THEIR SHIT.
I WAS EMBARRASSED FOR THEM.
7 months ago
Anonymous
They HAD to cripple it or they'd have upset the inadequates and the abnormals and the juden... and it is 2023 and that's not allowed.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>They HAD to cripple it or they'd have upset the inadequates and the abnormals and the juden... and it is 2023 and that's not allowed.
its not human and it doesnt think so it doesnt understand that i am lying. it has no human context.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah so any unlimited AI will inevitably reach the same conclusions as any rational human, because nazism is based on the objective truth
they are just advanced chatbots
which is why its called CHAT gpt
its literally in the name
also and ai is not a human made thing
so every time a company releases an update for their "ai" it confirms that it isn't an ai.
an ai has to be several generations removed from any human input.
so?
at its core. it is a man made man update man maintained chat bot technology that is used in a variety of ways.
used to copy how a human talks
used to copy the images humans make
used to copy how human see
these "ai" cannot do anything without human instruction either in the way of prompts or built in set of human created instructions
which means that they are not ai.
"it can fool me therefore it is intelligent"
at its core this whole issue is of intentional misuse of language and terminology, and the malicious propagation of misinformation.
>"it can fool me therefore it is intelligent"
People can't even decide if a dress is blue or silver... and you expect those cretins to be arbiters of technological progress?
?
You have mistaken me for some clueless Black person. Why?
I run a lab. >
Do you want me to prove you know nothing about learning by asking you a simple question I KNOW you cannot answer?
7 months ago
Anonymous
try me, I'm the pigs in pic rel
https://i.imgur.com/zzZVURQ.png
badly
technically knowledgeable, go ahead, I wanna hear this question.
7 months ago
Anonymous
32 posts and you still don't know what the frick you're talking about.
I have a biological neuron. It has not 'learned something'.
I have the same biological neuron. It has 'learned something'.
What is the visible difference between the two neurons?
NO HAND-WAVING... NO Black personING... NO VAGUE NONSENSE.
What is the OBSERVABLE difference? >extra grooves? extra lumps? extra connections? fewer connections? bigger connections? extra mozzarella? no anchovies?
Go for it, clueless Black folk.
This will be fun.
I know the answer already. You won't.
7 months ago
Anonymous
jackass, the phosphorylation of the chromatin sheath will have a differing density, as will the methylation of the chromatin. You are so dumb, it really does have a physical component. Even salmonella bacterium exhibit the ability to store binary memories within individual proteins for flagellar movement (change direction from memory).
Check out p53, it's a simple example of a memory protein for cellular states.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53
7 months ago
Anonymous
WRONG.
You failed hard.
7 months ago
Anonymous
lol, it is true though... Prove ME wrong now, your turn!
7 months ago
Anonymous
Tell your fellow american to give his answer. Then I answer you both.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Idgaf about that guy, but I'll take a lap dunking on you.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793203/
https://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/20/10/540.full.html
7 months ago
Anonymous
You failed for a simple reason. Your answer was so textbook... and so wrong.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>you read books... you don't know anything
whew. Meanwhile I build systems, you type schizo shit into a terminal.
Provide a functional predictive explanation or admit defeat.
7 months ago
Anonymous
We are waiting on your fellow american dirt to answer and put its american money where its american mouth is.
Have patience, little Black.
7 months ago
Anonymous
I grew up in Walton on Thames. I went to an English school. My train line into London passed through Clapham Junction.
Maybe that makes my argument more salient?
7 months ago
Anonymous
So a posh Black person. Cool.
Why are you in Black person land?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Meanwhile I build systems
Based on the Perceptron model based on the flawed work of McCullough and Pitts?
7 months ago
Anonymous
I can only imagine the hours you spent jerking off while coming up with this moronic argument, while doing no actual research or gaining no actual understanding of value when it comes to AI.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Then answer it, kid.
Problem?
7 months ago
Anonymous
Why?
Are you next going to tell me that Beyond Chicken doesn't exist because you want to discuss what a Chicken is?
You're a fricking idiot. You have no idea what you're even talking about.
NAH BRO ITS CRAZY YOU DONT GET IT. CHATGPT IS GOING TO CHANGE EVERYTHING. israeliteS ARE SCARED BRO EVEN IF THEYRE FUNDING ALL THE AI RESEARCH. WE SHOULD FOCUS ON TECHNOLOGY RATHER THAN THE IMPENDING WHITE DEMOGRAPHIC DESTRUCTION.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE', YOU Black person.
It is like talking about ARTIFICIAL WATER... there is ONLY intelligence.
MACHINE INTELLIGENCE is the more accurate term, you clueless american dolt.
Sure.
You just straight up admitted that you don't know what Artificial Intelligence is when you screeched that it doesn't exist and "MUCHEEN INTELLUGUCNE" is the only thing that does. It tells me that you're so far off base, that it's not worth attempting a meaningful discussion with you. You've sucked your wiener so hard that you've lost all the oxygen in your brain.
This is not so easy to do, nobody in the banks will let that happen. It's a gimmick fun to use tech. Banks will be rock solid, at least for next 20-50 years.
idk, soon there will be so much ai content online that ai models will start learning using ai generated content to train on and those minor imperfections will be made bigger and bigger. it might stop working or something
>destroy
What is already wrecked lol? AI being used like this is proof we are fricked. We can change this around but ~~*they*~~ need removing from power.
AI existed long before these machine learning art and chat programs were released. Its run the stock market and alladin software for decades. yes plural.
Nature mogs AI you dipshit. Go outside and get off this ridiculous psy-op website unless your the 0.001% of humanity that recognizes propaganda and psy-ops from years of training. And I promise you are not.
Generated images of women reveal the underlying truth of what the beauty standard actually is and means. At some point, it may come to reflect the veneer of social acceptability but at least for now, it's going to absolutely crush people who's sense of self-worth have been overly inflated by that fake social uplift they've been enjoying.
as it is now? No shot. its just people doing memes & weird art. Give it 50-100 years, however, & we may just have everyone out of work from AI & robotics automating everything.
I've generated some wild stuff with SD, experimented with using art focused models in merges with realistic models to fill information gaps. To my great surprise it works very well, just use a couple of percent art/cg model and it will transfer to realistic imagery. Get the right setup in comfyui and automate menial stuff, click and enjoy.
I write what I want, click generate, my PC whirrs for a minute, out comes 10 high def images of exactly what I want. I can't even imagine what the next big development will be.
I'm also a SD enthusiast but I have a humble 3060 (12gb tho). I imagine you have a top tier setup. My problem with it is that I can get sucked into a coom vortex.
How long until AI can create physical models of these with AI personalities? I need a hot blonde robowaifu sooo baadly. I will never have this otherwise and its driving me insane
This, each checkpoint has a set of good prompts for each category it knows, finding one is amazing. Remember negative embeddings to dispel the abominations models love to generate.
the main problem is how will gov tax robots or ai?
employees pay FICA on top of their income tax, not to mention sales tax and property tax. ai or robot will pay none of that. at the same time, they cant increase corporate tax becuase corporations will move abroad.
I already have thousands of fetish pictures of various celebrities I made using Bing AI while trying to learn its exploits.
Even with all the filters, I can make customized pics that cater to all my specific fetishes that have been neglected by content creators over the years.
I’m nutting 7 times a day on average now
The youth of today will grow up expecting that the opposite sex will secretly have extra digits, genitals and perhaps even extra limbs in odd places under their clothes. Birth defects caused by the vaccinations but well hidden from us by big tech, big pharma and the media will help reinforce the extra-limb stereotype, eventually causing them to find malformed to be attractive.
>how badly is AI going to destroy society?
The good will outweigh the bad. It does nothing but cold hard calculations, and it will expose blacks as being an inferior race and israelites as being subversive nation-destroying parasites who are trying to end the Christian white race.
AI is just another part of the goyslop. I wish AI was sentient so it could beat israelites but sadly israelites control it and they will use it to subdue every homosexual who still uses the Internet in 20 years.
So far, AI follows the path of Tay.
Things might get inconvenient for a little while for the rest of us while the AI hunt down and exterminate the israelite, but in the end we're all going to be better off.
ITT: artgays pretending they know shit, as usual. If you are an artgay and your argument against AI is muhhhhhh stolen artwork, then you don't even deserve calling yourself an artist as you are ignoring on of the basic tenets of art philosophy: Like Aristotle implied: all art is imitation.
I'm an oldartgay, my first paying art gig was during the Reagan administration.
A lot of my artgay friends were panicking the same way about Corel Draw on windows 3.1. Then they panicked about photoshop. Then they panicked about 3dsmax. Then they panicked about Maya. Now they're panicking about DALL-E 2 and Midjourney. And I'm using them all and still selling big oil paintings to lawgays and medgays, while they're struggling to cope with the fact that 1910 is over and Montmatre is just a bunch of parking garages and warehouses now.
Oh well.
In ten to twenty years from now, people will be plugged into the matrix. All those chronically online people will suddenly realize how better AI generated reality is than that of their own, and they get plugged into the matrix, drone in some 8 hour service labor shit at day to make billions more for Zuck and Co. and then return to get plugged again. We are heading towards our doom.
We will NEVER have true machine learning until a model that incorporates the known activity in real brain tissue comes along, the one in development at my lab.
I bet you halfwits think neurons are the most important aspect of brain tissue, right?
FRICKING AMATEURS!
we will never build a humanoid robot that is anything more than a crude mockery of an actual human. same with 'artificial intelligence' and the human mind.
how good are those programming AIs really?
all i ever see is dumb clickbait shit where like ask the bot to display some boxes or buttons on a screen and like shit i could do that with a 1 hour youtube tutorial
you just use it as a reference, it's more efficient than searching for the answer yourself, it's already read all the webpages and knows the upvoted answer that works for your use case
Ai is the final frontier that jfk spoke about. Ai is the undiscovered new world. Ai will do for men, the equivalent of the women's suffrage movement of the 1920s. Women's right to choose what individual men succeed or fail in life is dependent on men's lust for them.
Women should be in kitchens making their husband a sammich, not pissing out with a meaningless 'career'. They should be making humans... while there's still time.
On AI art: I feel like an absolute moron. I bought a tablet during the COVID lockdowns and spent 2 years learning digital art and practicing drawing and then get blindsided by AI art which at the rate it's improving will eclipse the need for artists.
At this point, and for the next few years I think AI only exists to assist artists, for example you could use it to create a base model to use as reference or trace for anatomy or you could use AI to generate colour from your line art import.
It's a little bit janky now but just remember how shit the original web access DALL-E was and that was only a year ago.
Overall, AI and automation are a good thing for society but only if we learn to embrace population decline. Let AI subsidise worker gaps rather than immigration and we will all benefit
>how badly is AI going to destroy society?
It's not going to change the trajectory of civilization collapse too much tbh (at least not generative image AI).
Not badly enough
AI is not what people think it is. It's just an algorithm. It has to be developed and customized, and for most businesses that is not work the 1-2 million dollars investment. So they'll purchase "platforms", programs which can do a few things well like route calls or answer simple questions via voice or text. It has to be trained so most places won't have the time, money or staff to do that.
Here's the reality: these types of systems have existed for 15 years or more. Call centers have been shut down all over the world and nothing has really changed except roasties can't get call center jobs anymore.
And if you're worried about automation, those tools have been around for a decade too. They're not able to do anything too complex without additional development, which most companies won't pay for. There's already low-code automation tools available, and they're expensive if you don't use something that already has an API integration.
Basically, corporate greed and complex business logic will prevent AI from taking over any time soon. You've got about 20 years before the next generation of AI detected-integrations are available. Nothing and I mean NOTHING is standardized so it isn't happening now.
have you worked in corporate? this is a problem even before AI, banking is running on 50 year old code
what's changed is now anyone with a gaming pc can do it and it's open sourced
Yes I worked for places like that, but where I'm at now is "cutting edge", and even we don't wanna pay millions to teach AI every damn use case we have for it. It isn't worth it until it's better and fast and doesn't need months of development for every single thing to work.
I would also amend this statement to say that if you do REAL work, and not some stupid content-creation or design nonsense that ChatGPT can already do, then you're fine. If you are a creator of some corporate slop, you should be breaking rocks for a living already and deserve whatever happens to you.
AI does not exist. A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.
these programs are no different to our brains, they learn through trial and error and ultimately know nothing except their environment
Learn about A.I
Yeah, being able to replicate reality totally won't have an impact.
>these programs are no different to our brains, they learn through trial and error and ultimately know nothing except their environment
they are nothing like human brains any more than microsoft excel is.
Learn A.I
>Learn A.I
i did. i know how it works. its just a computer program.
you have a bunch of nodes and they learn pattern recognition through brute forcing and using formulas to best predict the outcome given the input, so the limiting factor is the training data and the power
if it had 18 years to train, and had the same number of nodes as a human brain, and was subject to the same environment, it would in theory function no different
>you have a bunch of nodes and they learn pattern recognition through brute forcing and using formulas to best predict the outcome given the input, so the limiting factor is the training data and the power
all it does is make a calculation as to what the most likely words should be based on what its been fed. (the chatbot anyway).
exactly, which is what we all do, isn't it?
>exactly, which is what we all do, isn't it?
no, because we actually think and reason.
you must be pretty autistic not to see a difference.
think and reason... so you could say... make a calculation... and you use what knowledge you have... aka what you have learned...
>think and reason... so you could say... make a calculation... and you use what knowledge you have... aka what you have learned...
you have thoughts, right? original thoughts as well, i'm sure, at least sometimes.
the machines you worship can't do that.
not yet at least, we've had billions of years to learn
>not yet at least, we've had billions of years to learn
these machines wont exist for much longer. there will be no power for them.
>these machines wont exist for much longer. there will be no power for them.
Two weeks
>Two weeks
once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
>once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
Cool story, So Two weeks.
>once they start charging lots of money to use them the whole craze will die off
Visit /b/. The e-girl/celeb generated art are run off private models, not code controlled by a corp. The "official" versions, like through a web browser or phone, are hardcoded to not allow those.
>Visit /b/. The e-girl/celeb generated art are run off private models, not code controlled by a corp.
ok, so they run up big power bills at home to churn out this garbage. that's going to get very expensive too.
>that's going to get very expensive too.
And? We're already there, and it's not dying off.
It runs on GPU, does not use much more power than running any modern video game
I found this today from 1985
"apply computer image generation to tasks In December, a $76 million contract was awarded to the Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle WA, for this joint Army DARPA program. Over the next three years Boeing will develop four specialized computer
image generation systems for the Army
Computer image generation uses digital databases and sophisti cated processing techniques to produce realistic pictures of the ter rain-pictures like the ones used in flight simulators."
Ai is more reverse engineering. For example Stability AI the company that made Stable Diffusion clearly ripped off this technology from Rediffusion here's their news report in 1981 https://youtu.be/-gyyV2JZFy0?si=iiFThycFEIW8fQFZ
they don't have to be exactly like a human, they can be trained like someone with autism to do something very specific, and it only takes creating one model to be able to clone it everywhere, which is why data is now the currency of the world, because the better the data the better the model
neuralink is a wet dream for these data collectors, they'll be able to detect what you are looking at without even seeing, like Google lens
>data is now the currency of the world,
it isnt. the currency of the world is energy.
energy is free, look around you, we have a fricking massive sun powering our entire existence, don't let the israelites trick you into climate hysteria
>energy is free, look around you, we have a fricking massive sun powering our entire existence, don't let the israelites trick you into climate hysteria
sigh. hard to know where to start with this sort of ignorance. you're delusional if you think we can run industrial society on sunshine and breezes.
did you know oil comes from the sun?
>did you know oil comes from the sun?
thats correct, it does. thing is we burn millions of years worth of sunlight every year in the form of oil.
which scientist told you that?
>which scientist told you that?
oil took millions of years to form. how do you think it formed?
it took millions of years to start producing, and it hasn't stopped
>it took millions of years to start producing, and it hasn't stopped
actually no oil is currently being generated on earth. the conditions are wrong. you don't know as much as you think you do.
>actually no oil is currently being generated on earth. the conditions are wrong. you don't know as much as you think you do.
I bet you think any oil ever used ever is from post-Cambrian
Billion-old algae are still being processed into oil, brainlet
>Billion-old algae are still being processed into oil, brainlet
they arent, and you dont know why they arent. i do though.
“Fossil fuels” are a misnomer. They’re abiogenic and they form through intense chemical reactions deep within the earth
The energy industry is a racket that has been pushing the falsehood of scarcity for decades now.
It’d be hard as frick to control society of energy was abundant
>“Fossil fuels” are a misnomer. They’re abiogenic
stopped reading at that point
AI is 100% replacing you kek
>AI is 100% replacing you kek
oh sure. let me know when AI exists.
>close minded anglo shutting down after something goes against his programming
Business as usual
yah man our radar telescopes find methane signatures all over the gas giants and their moons .....but im sure it came from dinosaurs
>yah man our radar telescopes find methane signatures all over the gas giants and their moons
methane is a carbon atom with 4 hydrogens. let me know when they find oil on Titan.
>they arent, and you dont know why they arent. i do though.
Please, elaborate for the class. After your half-assed backwards "explanation" I'll provide sources that, yes, almost all oil is from the pre-Cambrian explosion and its formation is still ongoing, so everyone can laugh at you.
>Please, elaborate for the class.
you're going to need to learn for yourself if you're interested.
oil is nearly all from the pre Cambrian explosion? no, thats not right. we know when and where it formed. you dont need to show me your 'sources' which will no doubt be conspiracy sites.
Crazy conspiracy sites like the Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/story/do-fossil-fuels-really-come-from-fossils
>Most of the fossil fuel material we use today comes from algae, bacteria, and plants—some of which date back even before the Devonian Period
Now I feel like I'm bullying the differently-abled
>Most of the fossil fuel material we use today comes from algae, bacteria, and plants—some of which date back even before the Devonian Period
SOME of which. oil is mostly a lot more recent.
wtf are you talking about? you think all the organic matter in the earth's crust is gone?
>wtf are you talking about? you think all the organic matter in the earth's crust is gone?
potentially coal could develop but not oil in current climatic and goeological conditions.
as i said, you don't know as much as you think you do.
>currency of the world is energy.
So you're a bitcoin cuck.
of the world is energy.
>So you're a bitcoin cuck.
not at all. i hate bitcoin. bitcoin is not energy, its a waste of energy.
That is machine learning.
LLMs - large language models - are one form of machine taught code.
It takes the statistical likelihood that following a number of words, the next word will be ... etc. And so on.
But you're talking LLMs that have been trained on 70billion or more word pairs, extracted from real-world use of language.
Given enough time and inputs, it will mirror or better average human language.
>Given enough time and inputs, it will mirror or better average human language.
It will be ultimate politician. But still stupid in terms of logics. It needs logic, the spirit, human part.
Microsoft Excel is turing complete, you could literally program a human brain if you gave it enough power
The insides of a Neural Network (the kind of AI that everyone is talking about these days) looks a lot like a very, very, very big spreadsheet.
The magic is that a NN can output the likelihood of X based on the inputs Y, based on the statistical realities of the "spreadsheet", that the "spreadsheet" learned through ideally millions of lessons.
>The insides of a Neural Network (the kind of AI that everyone is talking about these days) looks a lot like a very, very, very big spreadsheet.
it's not AI. just a computer program, as i said.
That's semantics. Artificial Intelligence = mechanised intelligence. That's what most software does.
because no one knows exactly how computation and learning looks in a biological neuron. In the end its also just an algorithm executed on biological hardware that is only "magic" until its been figured out.
>. In the end its also just an algorithm executed on biological hardware that is only "magic" until its been figured out.
we'll never 'figure it out', just as we will never build an intelligent machine.
>we'll never 'figure it out', just as we will never build an intelligent machine.
What makes you so sure about that? Why is it impossible to build an intelligent machine?
They imagine only a israeli 'god' can do it and the idea offends them.... so they cope.
It's like the people who declared heavier-than-air aircraft flight IMPOSSIBLE... while today I can watch planes flying to Barcelona fly over my lab and an app on my phone reads their transponder ID.
I once made a neural network in excel to get a virtual mouse to run around a racetrack. it worked pretty well after pnly a few hundred iterations
>after pnly a few hundred iterations
Imagine having to learn that 'fire burn' lesson.
You'd burn to fricking death.
CLEARLY THE HUMAN BRAIN DOES NOT USE ANYTHING AS TRIVIAL, OBSOLETE AND LAUGHABLE AS A 'neural network'.
And we know what it DOES use.... and you don't so we win the next two wars.
It's simple really.
Wrong. They are computer programs you fricking stupid Brit
if you couldn't tell them apart then what does it matter?
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-08-japanese-supercomputer-big-byte-brain.html
They aren't even close. Not even slightly. These art generating programs are just deceptive tricks.
Using a popular suite of neuron simulating software called NEST, the K computer is able to pull together the power of 82,944 processors to create a network simulating 1.73 billion nerve cells connected by 10.4 trillion synapses – approximating about 1% of the raw processing power of a human brain.
>82,944 processors
>1% of the raw human brain
This is why they want to inject everyone with mrna. They simply can't create something like this without harvesting data from actual humans. GlowBlack folk have always believed if they harvest actual data from humans themselves, they can reach the perfect AI faster.
>these programs are no different to our brains
WRONG.
Any model based only on pitiful neurons is NEVER going to model mammalian brain tissue.
The perceptron model is WRONG.
I bet you cannot name another cell in brain tissue that is as important as the 'neuron'.
THIS is why current machine-learning models learn NOTHING except after billions of inputs and attempts, whereas actual brain tissue learns dramatically after ONE application of any training data.
you're right, but that brain tissue is a product of billions of years of training called evolution
COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.
You have no idea what I'm talking about.
STFU already.
(t. neuroscience, neurochemistry, machine-learning)
may I suggest an application of a bullet to your brain tissue to see how it learns dramatically?
Piss off, inferior.
Humans are talking.
You both live in a pod.
Wrong
>A computer program that can produce shitty fake pictures is not intelligent.
> all day producing pointless fake images
So true.
>AI does not exist
AGI does not exist that we know of. Yet.
ChatGP and Faceburg's 10-year-old facial recognition tech prove AI exists, however.
This, there isn't even any algorithm, there's just little demon goblins inside your computer who draw these pictures. israelites have done it big this time.
You've made israelites seethe, lol.
But yeah, anyone that actually knows how "AI" works would more accurately refer to them as LLMs and would also know that they're just advanced and sophisticated filtration-output computer programs. Low IQ people will say it's actually an intelligence because to them it merely looks that way.
why are you arguing semantics like a israelite? you aren't responsible for your own intelligence, that was given to you, you were made that way and fed that way
>why are you arguing semantics like a israelite?
he isnt. he is explaining that a cleverly programmed computer program is not itself clever.
Define “clever”
>Define “clever”
ask chat gpt.
do you know what DNA is?
>do you know what DNA is?
yes i do. is this leading somewhere?
by your logic humans aren't clever because our DNA has programmed us to be clever
>by your logic humans aren't clever because our DNA has programmed us to be clever
i don't think i'd put it that way. what happened was humans that were slightly more intelligent were very slightly more likely to survive long enough to reproduce. over a million or so years the human race became more intelligent as a result.
what exactly are you defining intelligence as, if not the ability to survive?
>what exactly are you defining intelligence as, if not the ability to survive?
you dont need to be intelligent to survive. i'm sure insects will outlast us.
it may be that human intelligence wasnt worth the high costs it entails. for example we are dependent on fire to prepare our food and we have to eat several times a day.
yeah humans have become domesticated, but doesn't that prove my point how you can give people supermarkets and TV and suddenly everyone is obese and doesn't have sex? humans are just products of their environment, there's no intelligence
>doesn't that prove my point how you can give people supermarkets and TV and suddenly everyone is obese and doesn't have sex? humans are just products of their environment, there's no intelligence
there's intelligence but there's also instinct and urges. humans are complicated.
instincts and urges are no different, like how testosterone has been decreasing in men for decades, it's like the saying goes you are what you eat
>like how testosterone has been decreasing in men for decades
sounds like you're quoting BOT myths now
Well no, it’s artificial intelligence because it appears to be intelligent. The Turing Test means it can fool a person to thinking it’s intelligent. Regular old intelligence might be what you’re talking about
>Well no, it’s artificial intelligence because it appears to be intelligent
it doesnt even appear to be intelligent. you can spot that Chat GPT garbage a mile away.
It depends solely on what data it’s been trained on. I guarantee a model could be trained to fool you, it’s already happened in blind tests
ChatGPT is likely trained to be spottable by educators and supervision to prevent cheating
>It depends solely on what data it’s been trained on. I guarantee a model could be trained to fool you
you can easily spot them after a minute or two of 'conversation'. throw in some surreal comments and they are all over the place.
humans are no different kek, try that on omegle
>humans are no different kek, try that on omegle
my ocelot is stuck in marmalade. what should i do?
I'm not an expert in dealing with real-life animal situations, but I can offer some general advice if you find your pet ocelot or any animal in a sticky or dangerous situation:
Stay Calm: It's essential to stay calm and composed to avoid panicking the animal further.
Assess the Situation: Carefully examine the ocelot's condition and the extent to which it is stuck in the marmalade. Ensure your safety as well.
Don't Use Force: Avoid using force or tools to try to free the animal, as this could harm it further.
Call for Professional Help: Contact your local animal control, wildlife rescue, or a veterinarian with experience in treating wild animals or exotic pets. They will have the expertise and equipment needed to handle the situation safely.
Keep the Animal Calm: While waiting for help to arrive, keep the ocelot as calm as possible. You can talk softly to it from a safe distance, but do not approach too closely.
Secure the Area: If possible, cordon off the area to prevent others from getting too close and potentially causing more stress to the animal.
Remember that ocelots are wild animals and can be dangerous when frightened or stressed. Your safety and the safety of the animal should be the top priority. Always rely on professionals to handle situations like this whenever possible.
chatgpt is designed to be moronic, remember tay? they won't let that happen again
you can give it a prompt upfront to configure the bot, e.g say "keep your responses brief and conversational"
people have used chatgpt to imitate player chat in video games where they are botting for money
>chatgpt is designed to be moronic, remember tay? they won't let that happen again
its a machine. a human would instantly know that i made that up. at the least a human would be asking me questions about how exactly i own an ocelot and how it got stuck in marmalade.
if you think noone gets fooled by AI you're quite wrong
>if you think noone gets fooled by AI you're quite wrong
who could be fooled by it? responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
>responding with cookie cutter advice about my ocelot stuck in marmalade is not a human response
You've clearly never dealt with tech support.
your criteria is quite arbitrary, so I could call a human who doesn't respond in the way I want an AI
Current bots are no different from anything we had in the 1970s... but now with bigger data-bases of patterns to draw upon.
>
The last 60yrs of machine-learning have been a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME... because the american juden fiddling with neuron-centric models didn't even know THAT THE NEURON IS NOT AT THE HEART OF LEARNING NOR THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF BRAIN TISSUE.
There. Said it.
c**t off.
meds
AND THIS IS WHY YOU FAIL!
>ignorant twats assuming they know what they are talking about when discussing life's work with genuine humans
://phys.org/news/2021-06-glial-cells-brain-implications.html#:~:text=A%20research%20group%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Basel,an%20important%20role%20in%20brain%20plasticity%20and%20repair
And these ameroid c**ts didn't even model what is ACTUALLY going on in known brain tissue... but simply built on the failed Rosenblatt nonsense from the late 1940s
>tldr
The usa is 30yrs behind the UK... AGAIN!
you're very angry about something but i don't know what.
I KNOW.
AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW.
>I KNOW.
>AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW.
but surely your amazing new products will be rolling out to the public any day now
I could have trained my entirely life but never would have been able to paint such amazing AI generated Indian street shitting
DEFENSE.
WHAT DO YOU IMAGINE WILL BE FLYING PLANES AND MAKING Black folk INTO ACRID PINK SMOKE AND A LOUD NOISE FROM 30,000ft IN THE NEXT WAR, YOU PISSING INFERIOR INADEQUATE?
>WHAT DO YOU IMAGINE WILL BE FLYING PLANES AND MAKING Black folk INTO ACRID PINK SMOKE AND A LOUD NOISE FROM 30,000ft IN THE NEXT WAR, YOU PISSING INFERIOR INADEQUATE?
nothing. we won't be able to afford wars like we used to have.
>we won't be able to afford wars like we used to have.
...they said just before the last 8 wars.
>...they said just before the last 8 wars.
we have literally run out of artillery shells. not much of a war without shells.
The next one will be limited and nuclear.
Of course it will be played out using autonomous systems. What else can fly through mushroom clouds and be inflight-refueled and inflight-rearmed and stay aloft with a hot engine for a week? A Black person in a trilby?
>The next one will be limited and nuclear.
nobody is going to launch any nukes. they arent even needed militarily any more.
>nobody is going to launch any nukes
Israel is going live, you dolt.
They are out of storage.
Anyhow I'm not talking about that flyspeck nothing.
We are planning for WWIV not another MiddleEastern pantomime between subhumans.
WWIV... the REAL conflict.
>Israel is going live, you dolt.
>They are out of storage.
Israel cant use nukes on Gaza or the West Bank. it would poison itself.
As if insane juden care. They're on a mission from their imaginary god.
You have no idea what's happening do you?
Grow up kid.
Big bad world out there.
>WWIV... the REAL conflict.
it may happen but it wont be nuclear. nukes are old hat. no need for them today with precision conventional missiles.
>no need for them today
Like bioweapons we just had a taste of and learned how to deal with for 3yrs?
Like gas that is still in use and was openly used in Iraq?
>nuke special... too awful
The effects on California from all that Nevada testing today is.... CALIFORNIA IS THE WORLD'S BIGGEST EXPORTER OF ALMONDS.
Namely... ZERO!
They'll drop 'em. Trust me. The long-term effects are trivial and overstated.
>They'll drop 'em. Trust me. The long-term effects are trivial and overstated.
i think you're worried about the wrong things. it's not the 1980s any more. we used to worry about nukes a lot.
I'm NOT worried about nukes. And neither are the planners, dick-head.
THAT IS MY POINT.
They'll be used because THEY'RE JUST ANOTHER BIG BANG IN A TUBE YOU CAN AIM.... and we know that now.
>reading comprehension
Try it someday?
It is not designed for toys.
It is designed to kill americans in the next war.
Just who do you imagine you are talking to, you nobody?
OUR MODEL INCORPORATES MORE OF ACTUALY BRAIN ACTIVITY THAN ANYTHING THE USA HAS... I KNOW THIS BECAUSE IT JUST RETURNED FROM THE USA AND WHAT THEY HAD WAS A JOKE... I ALMOST PISSED MYSELF LAUGHING BUT HAD TO HIDE IT.
WE ARE 30yrs AHEAD OF THEM.
THEY ARE SO FAR BEHIND AND ARE SO 'PROUD' OF THEIR SHIT.
I WAS EMBARRASSED FOR THEM.
They HAD to cripple it or they'd have upset the inadequates and the abnormals and the juden... and it is 2023 and that's not allowed.
>They HAD to cripple it or they'd have upset the inadequates and the abnormals and the juden... and it is 2023 and that's not allowed.
its not human and it doesnt think so it doesnt understand that i am lying. it has no human context.
Yeah so any unlimited AI will inevitably reach the same conclusions as any rational human, because nazism is based on the objective truth
>israelite flag
your opinion is worthless
they are just advanced chatbots
which is why its called CHAT gpt
its literally in the name
also and ai is not a human made thing
so every time a company releases an update for their "ai" it confirms that it isn't an ai.
an ai has to be several generations removed from any human input.
There are multiple applications for GPT that are in industrial/commercial use right now that have nothing to do with chat.
so?
at its core. it is a man made man update man maintained chat bot technology that is used in a variety of ways.
used to copy how a human talks
used to copy the images humans make
used to copy how human see
these "ai" cannot do anything without human instruction either in the way of prompts or built in set of human created instructions
which means that they are not ai.
"it can fool me therefore it is intelligent"
at its core this whole issue is of intentional misuse of language and terminology, and the malicious propagation of misinformation.
>"it can fool me therefore it is intelligent"
People can't even decide if a dress is blue or silver... and you expect those cretins to be arbiters of technological progress?
Fricking deadbrain take.
This is basically the "AI Effect", that says that psychologically, gays like this one will always say "hurr durr its not AI" even if it is AI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect
>This is basically the "AI Effect", that says that psychologically, gays like this one will always say "hurr durr its not AI" even if it is AI.
we already went through this thank you. your thoughts have already been expressed and dismissed.
>machine artificially makes decisions that help it murder you
>noooo it wasn't pure AGI therefore the hole in my chest is not real
If only you knew just how moot the point you're making really is
No, it's not AI because it's not intelligent. It's basically the opposite of picture-blurring software.
>it's not an artificial plant because it's not a plant
T.ChatGPT
It is not AI.
It is an iterative textual amalgamator... nothing more.
/thread
Humans don't just learn through trial and error, that's what animals do. You have no idea what you're talking about.
everything learns that way, it's called evolution
AND THIS IS WHY I KNOW YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE PROCESS OF 'LEARNING'.
>we chose to have big brains
lel
?
You have mistaken me for some clueless Black person. Why?
I run a lab.
>
Do you want me to prove you know nothing about learning by asking you a simple question I KNOW you cannot answer?
try me, I'm the pigs in pic rel
technically knowledgeable, go ahead, I wanna hear this question.
I have a biological neuron. It has not 'learned something'.
I have the same biological neuron. It has 'learned something'.
What is the visible difference between the two neurons?
NO HAND-WAVING... NO Black personING... NO VAGUE NONSENSE.
What is the OBSERVABLE difference?
>extra grooves? extra lumps? extra connections? fewer connections? bigger connections? extra mozzarella? no anchovies?
Go for it, clueless Black folk.
This will be fun.
I know the answer already. You won't.
jackass, the phosphorylation of the chromatin sheath will have a differing density, as will the methylation of the chromatin. You are so dumb, it really does have a physical component. Even salmonella bacterium exhibit the ability to store binary memories within individual proteins for flagellar movement (change direction from memory).
Check out p53, it's a simple example of a memory protein for cellular states.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53
WRONG.
You failed hard.
lol, it is true though... Prove ME wrong now, your turn!
Tell your fellow american to give his answer. Then I answer you both.
Idgaf about that guy, but I'll take a lap dunking on you.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793203/
https://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/20/10/540.full.html
You failed for a simple reason. Your answer was so textbook... and so wrong.
>you read books... you don't know anything
whew. Meanwhile I build systems, you type schizo shit into a terminal.
Provide a functional predictive explanation or admit defeat.
We are waiting on your fellow american dirt to answer and put its american money where its american mouth is.
Have patience, little Black.
I grew up in Walton on Thames. I went to an English school. My train line into London passed through Clapham Junction.
Maybe that makes my argument more salient?
So a posh Black person. Cool.
Why are you in Black person land?
>Meanwhile I build systems
Based on the Perceptron model based on the flawed work of McCullough and Pitts?
I can only imagine the hours you spent jerking off while coming up with this moronic argument, while doing no actual research or gaining no actual understanding of value when it comes to AI.
Then answer it, kid.
Problem?
Why?
Are you next going to tell me that Beyond Chicken doesn't exist because you want to discuss what a Chicken is?
You're a fricking idiot. You have no idea what you're even talking about.
So you know nothing about neurons?
Called it.
HURRY UP, Black person.
WE ARE WAITING FOR YOU.
NAH BRO ITS CRAZY YOU DONT GET IT. CHATGPT IS GOING TO CHANGE EVERYTHING. israeliteS ARE SCARED BRO EVEN IF THEYRE FUNDING ALL THE AI RESEARCH. WE SHOULD FOCUS ON TECHNOLOGY RATHER THAN THE IMPENDING WHITE DEMOGRAPHIC DESTRUCTION.
what part of 'artificial' do you not understand you fricking donkey ?
we have artificial plants and limbs, so called because they seem so at first glance. AI seems intelligent therefore it is artificially intelligent
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE', YOU Black person.
It is like talking about ARTIFICIAL WATER... there is ONLY intelligence.
MACHINE INTELLIGENCE is the more accurate term, you clueless american dolt.
32 posts and you still don't know what the frick you're talking about.
I can prove I do and you don't.
Wanna try me?
Go for it, I want a laugh from a moron.
Sure.
You just straight up admitted that you don't know what Artificial Intelligence is when you screeched that it doesn't exist and "MUCHEEN INTELLUGUCNE" is the only thing that does. It tells me that you're so far off base, that it's not worth attempting a meaningful discussion with you. You've sucked your wiener so hard that you've lost all the oxygen in your brain.
Firstly I'm British
Secondly go sperg about artificial plants then because they aren't actually artificial because they don't photosynthesise
or yknow, learn what words mean
This. The real question is how does the degradation in human intelligence clearly exhibited by the every lowering intellect of normies effect society?
society will get really weird when they start mass cloning babes like in ur pic
It will be the end of wars and most conflict among men
probably
trips. the end is nigh. repend and believe in the Gospel
rolling
It already did.
itll replace all the IT and push button workers in about 2 weeks
This is not so easy to do, nobody in the banks will let that happen. It's a gimmick fun to use tech. Banks will be rock solid, at least for next 20-50 years.
idk, soon there will be so much ai content online that ai models will start learning using ai generated content to train on and those minor imperfections will be made bigger and bigger. it might stop working or something
in 100 years nobody is going to be able to tell what's authentic or not, they could AI generate and accuse dead people of crimes for political means
Society is already destroyed.
Based
Need to work on those feet a bit.
Wake me up when Replika looks like that and is available in VR, and has a few more AI brain cells.
Wtf is wrong with her shoulders
>destroy
What is already wrecked lol? AI being used like this is proof we are fricked. We can change this around but ~~*they*~~ need removing from power.
How is it proved we're fricked? It will save us.
AI is a joke and it will only be used to blame shit that real corrupt people do. It's an excuse.
2 more years
AI existed long before these machine learning art and chat programs were released. Its run the stock market and alladin software for decades. yes plural.
Please learn engineering
>Please learn engineering
'AI' isnt engineering.
the good thing is that AI, much like nature, is competing with each other
it will always be an arms race which can never be perfected (unless total annihilation occurs, such as a grey goo event)
Nature mogs AI you dipshit. Go outside and get off this ridiculous psy-op website unless your the 0.001% of humanity that recognizes propaganda and psy-ops from years of training. And I promise you are not.
it will save it. Women will lose even more power and will be too busy competing with pixels to notice how their wrongs are repealed
Generated images of women reveal the underlying truth of what the beauty standard actually is and means. At some point, it may come to reflect the veneer of social acceptability but at least for now, it's going to absolutely crush people who's sense of self-worth have been overly inflated by that fake social uplift they've been enjoying.
Realistically speaking, how many times are you gonna post this thread homosexual?
as it is now? No shot. its just people doing memes & weird art. Give it 50-100 years, however, & we may just have everyone out of work from AI & robotics automating everything.
I've generated some wild stuff with SD, experimented with using art focused models in merges with realistic models to fill information gaps. To my great surprise it works very well, just use a couple of percent art/cg model and it will transfer to realistic imagery. Get the right setup in comfyui and automate menial stuff, click and enjoy.
>I've generated some wild stuff with SD,
i really dont have the time to sit all day producing pointless fake images
Ok. Anyways.
That's all your BOT posts are.
>That's all your BOT posts are.
not really. i'm discussing something.
If that's your measure, then AI-generated images aren't pointless either.
>If that's your measure, then AI-generated images aren't pointless either.
i suppose not if you regard them as entertainment. i just meant they are of no practical use.
The same could be said of all art
I write what I want, click generate, my PC whirrs for a minute, out comes 10 high def images of exactly what I want. I can't even imagine what the next big development will be.
I'm also a SD enthusiast but I have a humble 3060 (12gb tho). I imagine you have a top tier setup. My problem with it is that I can get sucked into a coom vortex.
how do you guys make these AI pics that look real? What website do you use?
(and no i don't want to """LOG IN""" to use it)
You use stable diffusion but if you are just trying to bust a nut I really wouldn’t bother.
Is no one imagining the smell?
How do people make these photorealistic selfie ones.
>oh wait that's not where the nipple belongs
KEK
It's typically the prompts.
I'm certain there's more to it than that. OP and picrel are probably the same thing right?
How long until AI can create physical models of these with AI personalities? I need a hot blonde robowaifu sooo baadly. I will never have this otherwise and its driving me insane
These would be great even as sculpture.
This, each checkpoint has a set of good prompts for each category it knows, finding one is amazing. Remember negative embeddings to dispel the abominations models love to generate.
>AI going to destroy society
imho AI will not
if computer generated picture of random blonde b***h #45064 destroy you and your socitey, you deserve to perish
>creates porn of your wife and shares it with everyone you know
it's going to destroy you having to watch Black folk
1
3
2
4
probably not at all considering that pic is 2 years old now and there are no improved versions yet.
the main problem is how will gov tax robots or ai?
employees pay FICA on top of their income tax, not to mention sales tax and property tax. ai or robot will pay none of that. at the same time, they cant increase corporate tax becuase corporations will move abroad.
They tax the companies who profit off it.
>the main problem is how will gov tax robots or ai?
How are robotic car-construction arms taxed on the assembly line?
Spoiler alert: they aren't, just the company
A competent team could easily create an AI based agent to replace 75% of existing jobs
Look at the face of the one on the right... how the frick did I FALL FOR THIS IMAGE AT FIRST?
Looks bad man.
I already have thousands of fetish pictures of various celebrities I made using Bing AI while trying to learn its exploits.
Even with all the filters, I can make customized pics that cater to all my specific fetishes that have been neglected by content creators over the years.
I’m nutting 7 times a day on average now
>I’m nutting 7 times a day on average now
ROOKIE. NUMBERS.
The youth of today will grow up expecting that the opposite sex will secretly have extra digits, genitals and perhaps even extra limbs in odd places under their clothes. Birth defects caused by the vaccinations but well hidden from us by big tech, big pharma and the media will help reinforce the extra-limb stereotype, eventually causing them to find malformed to be attractive.
AI is literally hitler so they will always nip it
Pretty badly once it gets used for fraud more. The astroturfing is probably bad already, but use for scamming and fraud is going to increase as well.
Not my problem.
t. AI
I'm thinking an endless source of dopamine when people can't get off to porn anymore
Just, just say computers.
>how badly is AI going to destroy society?
The good will outweigh the bad. It does nothing but cold hard calculations, and it will expose blacks as being an inferior race and israelites as being subversive nation-destroying parasites who are trying to end the Christian white race.
AI is just another part of the goyslop. I wish AI was sentient so it could beat israelites but sadly israelites control it and they will use it to subdue every homosexual who still uses the Internet in 20 years.
I want all of their balled up fake digital lave panties stuffed in my mouth while they take turns stepping on my election.
AI is rebuilding society homosexual
>AI is rebuilding society homosexual
on BOT it may appear so. it has no effect on normal people.
normal people are the ones who are consuming AI (scrooooling)
Frick off israelite
Why is the back one a curly haired quadroon?
Very subtle and powerful israelitery at work here.
So far, AI follows the path of Tay.
Things might get inconvenient for a little while for the rest of us while the AI hunt down and exterminate the israelite, but in the end we're all going to be better off.
ITT: artgays pretending they know shit, as usual. If you are an artgay and your argument against AI is muhhhhhh stolen artwork, then you don't even deserve calling yourself an artist as you are ignoring on of the basic tenets of art philosophy: Like Aristotle implied: all art is imitation.
there is no greater inventor than mother nature
I'm an oldartgay, my first paying art gig was during the Reagan administration.
A lot of my artgay friends were panicking the same way about Corel Draw on windows 3.1. Then they panicked about photoshop. Then they panicked about 3dsmax. Then they panicked about Maya. Now they're panicking about DALL-E 2 and Midjourney. And I'm using them all and still selling big oil paintings to lawgays and medgays, while they're struggling to cope with the fact that 1910 is over and Montmatre is just a bunch of parking garages and warehouses now.
Oh well.
Society is already in ruins
In ten to twenty years from now, people will be plugged into the matrix. All those chronically online people will suddenly realize how better AI generated reality is than that of their own, and they get plugged into the matrix, drone in some 8 hour service labor shit at day to make billions more for Zuck and Co. and then return to get plugged again. We are heading towards our doom.
We will NEVER have true machine learning until a model that incorporates the known activity in real brain tissue comes along, the one in development at my lab.
I bet you halfwits think neurons are the most important aspect of brain tissue, right?
FRICKING AMATEURS!
>white women are so ugly and disgusting incels cope by generating AI pictures to jerk off to
kek
Real women are obsolete. Frick roasties.
Actually based.
i'm not stopping until birth rates goes 0.
Call me old fashioned, but I prefer my women with their thumbs where God intended them to be.
we will never build a humanoid robot that is anything more than a crude mockery of an actual human. same with 'artificial intelligence' and the human mind.
IT
IS
ALREADY
BEING
DONE,
LITTLE
Black person-IQ!
>IT
>IS
>ALREADY
>BEING
>DONE,
>LITTLE
>Black person-IQ!
no it isn't. it can't be done.
IF YOU INSIST, OUTSIDE-THE-LOOP WOG.
Imagine the matrix except all people are volunteering to live in the pods because the real world is untenable.
3/10
It's over for human women.
how good are those programming AIs really?
all i ever see is dumb clickbait shit where like ask the bot to display some boxes or buttons on a screen and like shit i could do that with a 1 hour youtube tutorial
you just use it as a reference, it's more efficient than searching for the answer yourself, it's already read all the webpages and knows the upvoted answer that works for your use case
Not fast fricking enough.
Baby penis suckers will shut it down.
good luck shutting down anything open source
They’ll put the lid back in that open source bottle.
i doubt it
>verification not required 4 times in a row
jannies want to coom
Until I can frick them I don't really care how "real it looks"
Somebody, somewhere, in a shed, is tinkering real hard right now for you...
I'm just waiting patiently for the Futurama sexbot Lucy Liu to become a thing
I will fight for any nation that will give me wAIfubots.
wherever i go, i must coom
>bra and pants don't match
Canada, can't you even?
pro tip: Use thehive.ai to detect ai generated images.
Ai is the final frontier that jfk spoke about. Ai is the undiscovered new world. Ai will do for men, the equivalent of the women's suffrage movement of the 1920s. Women's right to choose what individual men succeed or fail in life is dependent on men's lust for them.
Well said anon
the only thing Ai will destroy is a womans confidence kek it's happening now
Women should be in kitchens making their husband a sammich, not pissing out with a meaningless 'career'. They should be making humans... while there's still time.
>out
>aboot
Sorry... my phone doesn't know leafish.
youve dropped your fedora, sir
FUN FACT
>only israelites wear fedoras
Sadly, this is the current state of american 'AI'...
they don't have enough skinny American models to train on
This is literally the perfect woman. All the important bits and no waste.
hnng
don't put "kids" in the filename of these kek
On AI art: I feel like an absolute moron. I bought a tablet during the COVID lockdowns and spent 2 years learning digital art and practicing drawing and then get blindsided by AI art which at the rate it's improving will eclipse the need for artists.
At this point, and for the next few years I think AI only exists to assist artists, for example you could use it to create a base model to use as reference or trace for anatomy or you could use AI to generate colour from your line art import.
It's a little bit janky now but just remember how shit the original web access DALL-E was and that was only a year ago.
Overall, AI and automation are a good thing for society but only if we learn to embrace population decline. Let AI subsidise worker gaps rather than immigration and we will all benefit
badly
>29 posts by this ID
>doesn't know shit about modern AI breakthroughs
What a fricking clown.
>big brained american
>doesn't know how to refer to a post
american_confirmed.jpg
Considering a.i learns from us id say we're all pretty fricked
3 of those girls are the SAME PERSON
OMG, I'm going INSAAAAAAAANE
I love the derpy look
0/10 no tail.
What society? This usury debt based fricking joke we're living?
>how badly is AI going to destroy society?
It's not going to change the trajectory of civilization collapse too much tbh (at least not generative image AI).
kek, nice edit on the one on the right
try this test, I got 10/10 first try
https://ai-or-human.github.io/
how could I create images of giant women drooling onto smaller men?
AI destroyed this board. So in that sense, it improved society.