In my country they can only arrest you for three days without throwing a serious accusation (that has to be backed up by an article of law), then a judge decides if that accusation has merit. If they decide that it doesn't, you can go free.
While they can't keep you indefinitely, they can certainly just charge you with resisting arrest, or assaulting a police officers fist with your face for example. In America anyways, though I'm sure in some countries they don't even need a reason and you just disappear.
moron resisting arrest requires you to be under arrest and resisting. Same with assault on a police officer. If you're not a dumb fricking Black person who chimps out at the mere presence of a police officer, they can't charge you with that. Unless you're already a menace to society and an immediate danger to the police, you're not going to get arrested or even handcuffed. And if you did not in fact commit a crime, just let them handcuff you anyways and say nothing and immediately get a lawyer and sue them for wrongful imprisonment.
They in fact have to cite a crime you committed when they arrest you and if they don't you can sue the shit out of them. Also this knowledge can get you out of being arrested especially with a lawyer who is, in fact, knowledgeable of the law. Your mileage may vary in a hellhole like Pakistan though.
You can sue them after you contact a lawyer after they have returned your cellphone to you after they let you out of the hand cuffs and free you from your jail cell
i assume she is in the UK as she said "non-emergency line" and i don't know if other countries are dumb enough to have that shit as well as under-resourced emergency lines.
the situation in the OP would be illegal in the UK under what are called Revenge Porn laws, but really encompass all acts where explicit images are circulated of a person (female) with either the intent or outcome to cause distress, shock, fear, embarrassment and so on. it doesn't matter if the pic is AI or not, but the cops would at least have to investigate it. she should call again and try not to get a muslim.
>i assume she is in the UK as she said "non-emergency line" and i don't know if other countries are dumb enough to have that shit as well as under-resourced emergency lines.
Every country has a non emergency line. This was probably in the US.
it makes complete sense to have a non-emergency line moron
it's for when you want to contact the police but it's not life threatening
you're probably some gay who'd call 911 if your ipad doesn't charge
Here in the UK I called the emergency line when some crackhead shot up heroin, had a fight with another crackhead, and then pissed on my doorstep. The lady who took my call had a go at me for asking the police to arrest the crackhead (even though antisocial behaviour, public obscenity, and urination/defecation on private property are crimes). Apparently we have so many stabbings here in the UK that it was unreasonable to expect the police to respond to my call on a weekend.
The whole point of non emergency lines is so non-urgent crimes can be reported. When your bike gets stolen and you discover it 6 hours later? You call the non-emergency line? Someone is pointing a gun at you attempting to steal your bike? You call the emergency line.
>Someone is pointing a gun at you attempting to steal your bike? You call the emergency line.
Anon, that's how you get shot.. Don't think the guy will just stand there waiting for you to make a call.
> Someone is pointing a gun at you attempting to steal your bike? You call the emergency line.
yo, hold up homie I gotta call 911 you're stealin' my bike.
>get a call back from police like 10 seconds later >homie hasn't left with your bike yet because he decides to go through your pockets >takes your phone, answers >"you dialed sos line, what is your emergency?" >get shot
11 months ago
Anonymous
>sos is a phone call, it would be an open line >dumb homie probably doesn't want to go to prison for murder >dumb homie isn't going to answer the phone because who frick knows is on the other side of the line >dumb homie here, I'm robbin ur friend
If anything they'd make you answer it, and 911 is trained to talk to people in the process of being robbed.
so you're saying that the following case is possible >make porn image of girl >it resembles some random roastie >roastie sees it and goes apeshit >suddenly wake up to court summons
britcucks are truly cucked.
I found a Chinese artist who will hand paint any woman, man or horse naked if you give them a template
So if the roastbeefs manage to ban AI the chuds can still traumatize them albeit at higher cost
>yeah this random man I met was actually a haxxor with 3 million gigabytes graphics card and he was also the author of stable diffusion and it just so happened that he saw me, lusted after me and made me into a porn actress
It sounds terrible, but the story seems far fetched to me
I've read this excuse a few times and it's so funny to me. What an absurd sounding story lmfao >Buh buh buh- I'm not an Internet prostitute, the r-r-robot did it!!!!
What can a zoomer do that a boomer can't do? Because zoomers fall for the same exact propaganda just on the opposite side of things. And they're also tech illiterate. And they are so poor most of them will never own a home. Zoomers are just inferior boomers.
Was a pipe dream 20 years ago. But the irony is if you foresaw the future and saved all those scantily clad photos of your high school classmates before they took them down years later, you've got all the source data you need.
I was a tad late but still scraped a few good images that I've now noticed have been deleted of my crush. And I've already trained a dataset and generated hundreds of images with em. My life is complete
>charge false rape case >deepfake porn m'lady >IS THIS REALLY WHAT LIFE AS A WOMAN HAS COME TO?
AI may solve their destructive behavior very soon as a weapon of mass penetration, mark my word.
Where does legislating against it end? Should it be illegal to imagine someone naked? If so then how to you prevent these powers being abused, since you have just set the precedent that the state is allowed to criminalize what goes on in your own mind, and thus by extension you have just set the precedent that the state is allowed to prosecute without evidence, since nobody can read minds and thus all thoughtcrime laws rely on hearsay. TL; DR, it's allowed because disallowing it introduces bugs everywhere else.
You have to be very popular online for someone to make porn of you, and it's easy to avoid being popular. If you are so sensitive about this kind of stuff, why even post online?
The good news is that she can offer the man who made the pictures to have sex with her instead of jerking off to the pictures and she can finally stop being a femcel
This what the "nudify" threads on /b/ are about. Scammers pretend they want their friend or crush nudified, but really they just use them to scam thots - "give me $500 or I'll send this to your dad"
In the future, women will get requests to be "used" by men in their personal holodeck, some credits compensation will be applied to the girl for the experience. Think only fans, but a virtual experience that feels like the real thing.
There will be awkward encounters between men and women in the work place as they joke about having "used" one another, but it will be so normal that eventually the women will see it as flattering. Celebrities will cost extra, and global elites will bypass age restrictions and will be able to "use" girls inconspicuously without notifications or approval.
I think this might happen. Was thinking the other day it would be nice to simulate the one that got away due to distance and maybe go on a date of sorts. Was kind of thinking the ping way or like licensing yourself out.
It would actually probably end up solving many of the problems with modern relationships. People get bored, and you may want to frick the neighbours daughter/wife, and you would do so if your wife/girlfriend would let you, but of course most people don't want to loan out their own wife so you're stuck with "cheating." But if you could have your cake and eat it too those fantasises would likely be extinguished.
>I can now discreetly take pictures of coworkers and have nudes of them
Like I wouldn't even be fapping to them, they all have such basic b***h bodies. But what would get me off is the amount of seething that I, a disgusting ugly incel, would cause from knowing what they look like without clothes. Something that they were reserving for chad only.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I wouldn't recommend doing creepshots of your coworkers
11 months ago
Anonymous
Female hands typed this post.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Well in most jurisdictions creepshots are illegal and you will definitely get fired if you're caught doing it. Also it's not very smart to do this shit with real people before you do something in the real world that will get you arrested. Stick to thots on Instagram you don't know. I mean look at yourself, you're already contemplating committing a real crime for your perversion.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>noooooooooooo you can't take the heckin creepshots t-that's ILLEGAL
Kek imagine living somewhere where taking public photos of people is illegal. Also watch me not give a shit.
11 months ago
Anonymous
You'll give a shit when you're caught
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's not illegal to take pictures of people in public and it's not illegal to use AI software. Seethe more foid.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>fat incel with zero social skills >take secret pictures of coworkers
Okay buddy, you'll not only not be completely obvious when you do it but you'll spill your spaghetti all over too.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Who needs creepshots when you have Google Meet calls with your coworkers?
other way: open an image in paint, paint the head black and the rest white and use img2img upload inpaint. The black and white picture is your mask. Use DDIM with 45 sampling steps. Loopback is also good
Cops are still public servants -and unionized ones at that - and will do everything in their power to not work.
She will have to hire a lawyer if she wants anything to happen.
She definitely has a case, maybe even a criminal one.
Your all laughing but this is the kind of stuff that is going to make ai illegal in the west. Especially once the internet starts getting flooded with ai Anne frank porn
Good luck making open source projects illegal >Especially once the internet starts getting flooded with ai Anne frank porn
You could make that today but nobody wants to see that shit
There is absolutely nothing morally or legally wrong with generating art, pornographic or otherwise, based on a random person.
Showing it to them might be harassment and making it public could, depending on the circumstance, be slander or defacement, but that is more a lawyer situation than a police thing. The police are not there to be helping you with your problems.
I genuinely want to see "AI" porn to see how good it was. I have a hard time believing you can make something that convincing without some telltale signs it's AI
Random image I found on /soc/. I don't normally go there but I figured it was the best place to find pictures of people in a neutral pose.
My troon radar is going off here.
Random image I found on /soc/. I don't normally go there but I figured it was the best place to find pictures of people in a neutral pose.
My troon radar is going off here.
Not bad, but I can see where the neck and chest separate as well as issues with skin tone. Could use some touchup in photoshop afterwards. Nice attempt.
because I'm not a complete butthole I cropped the head, also the tan is free
Yeah I wasn't going to spend forever plus a black shirt is horrible to deal with, I had to color it with flesh tone first.
Coloring with flesh tone is outdated, though I am still working on perfecting the "mirror selfie" blur found in low quality pictures.
https://litter.catbox.moe/6ghj8j.png
I was doing this for years for free before AI was a thing. 90% of /r/ was for porn photoshops. I quit when apps like Snapchat starting making face swap apps that could get it nearly right. It was no longer a skill worth developing.
It's always been a thing and you're moronic to think it can be stopped
if you post your body online, that means you automatically consent to everything. it's the same as if an artist saw your photo and drew a nude of you, except more realistic and better
I find the whole story implausible. I tried that sort of thing but at best it looks kinda similar. Even with textual inversions and a checkpoint that actually has seen the person before.
And I'm talking famous people. Like it will kinda look Milla Jovovich-ish.
How could it work with some random internet person?
women love
-alcohol
-sex
-money
-gossip
-public posturing
that's all. Women don't even love their kids. Kids are jsut a tool for them in order to smother them and delude themselves they are not loathsome.
You really have to understand women do only 2 things:
-with men they have sex
-and among women, they talk about the sex they had with men
there that's 100% the life of a woman .
women are inherently sexual perverts. Men don't like sex, men like the competition before and during sex and to see a girl orgasming due to their dicks, and for the atheists due to their tongues. Ie men love the competition and having a direct influence on the world. men dont love sex at all . It's only women who are hedonistic and sex cravings machines coasting thru life thanks to their orbiters
That's how npcs (goyims) work. Unless something is regulated they don't know what's right or wrong. That's funny
The police cannot just jail people because they think they did something wrong. That'd be vigilante justice and not police.
In theory yes but practially speaking police always surpasses any reasonable means if it's warranted by law
Police are not required to know or understand the law to arrest you
This is well established legally
In my country they can only arrest you for three days without throwing a serious accusation (that has to be backed up by an article of law), then a judge decides if that accusation has merit. If they decide that it doesn't, you can go free.
While they can't keep you indefinitely, they can certainly just charge you with resisting arrest, or assaulting a police officers fist with your face for example. In America anyways, though I'm sure in some countries they don't even need a reason and you just disappear.
moron resisting arrest requires you to be under arrest and resisting. Same with assault on a police officer. If you're not a dumb fricking Black person who chimps out at the mere presence of a police officer, they can't charge you with that. Unless you're already a menace to society and an immediate danger to the police, you're not going to get arrested or even handcuffed. And if you did not in fact commit a crime, just let them handcuff you anyways and say nothing and immediately get a lawyer and sue them for wrongful imprisonment.
They in fact have to cite a crime you committed when they arrest you and if they don't you can sue the shit out of them. Also this knowledge can get you out of being arrested especially with a lawyer who is, in fact, knowledgeable of the law. Your mileage may vary in a hellhole like Pakistan though.
You can sue them after you contact a lawyer after they have returned your cellphone to you after they let you out of the hand cuffs and free you from your jail cell
???
Give me my million dollars then. I could only be so lucky as to have a wrongful arrest suit.
You're a pajeet, aren't you?
This is how you win a nice chunk of money in a settlement. Happens almost every single day.
This is only true for god forsaken hellholes like USA
i assume she is in the UK as she said "non-emergency line" and i don't know if other countries are dumb enough to have that shit as well as under-resourced emergency lines.
the situation in the OP would be illegal in the UK under what are called Revenge Porn laws, but really encompass all acts where explicit images are circulated of a person (female) with either the intent or outcome to cause distress, shock, fear, embarrassment and so on. it doesn't matter if the pic is AI or not, but the cops would at least have to investigate it. she should call again and try not to get a muslim.
>i assume she is in the UK as she said "non-emergency line" and i don't know if other countries are dumb enough to have that shit as well as under-resourced emergency lines.
Every country has a non emergency line. This was probably in the US.
it makes complete sense to have a non-emergency line moron
it's for when you want to contact the police but it's not life threatening
you're probably some gay who'd call 911 if your ipad doesn't charge
Here in the UK I called the emergency line when some crackhead shot up heroin, had a fight with another crackhead, and then pissed on my doorstep. The lady who took my call had a go at me for asking the police to arrest the crackhead (even though antisocial behaviour, public obscenity, and urination/defecation on private property are crimes). Apparently we have so many stabbings here in the UK that it was unreasonable to expect the police to respond to my call on a weekend.
The whole point of non emergency lines is so non-urgent crimes can be reported. When your bike gets stolen and you discover it 6 hours later? You call the non-emergency line? Someone is pointing a gun at you attempting to steal your bike? You call the emergency line.
>Someone is pointing a gun at you attempting to steal your bike? You call the emergency line.
Anon, that's how you get shot.. Don't think the guy will just stand there waiting for you to make a call.
> Someone is pointing a gun at you attempting to steal your bike? You call the emergency line.
yo, hold up homie I gotta call 911 you're stealin' my bike.
>emergency sos
>nuffin personnel
>get a call back from police like 10 seconds later
>homie hasn't left with your bike yet because he decides to go through your pockets
>takes your phone, answers
>"you dialed sos line, what is your emergency?"
>get shot
>sos is a phone call, it would be an open line
>dumb homie probably doesn't want to go to prison for murder
>dumb homie isn't going to answer the phone because who frick knows is on the other side of the line
>dumb homie here, I'm robbin ur friend
If anything they'd make you answer it, and 911 is trained to talk to people in the process of being robbed.
so you're saying that the following case is possible
>make porn image of girl
>it resembles some random roastie
>roastie sees it and goes apeshit
>suddenly wake up to court summons
britcucks are truly cucked.
Look, they don't even know laws aren't the decider of good and bad!
she was literally raped
That's why she's literally shaking
I found a Chinese artist who will hand paint any woman, man or horse naked if you give them a template
So if the roastbeefs manage to ban AI the chuds can still traumatize them albeit at higher cost
>or horse
hey i hate the meme
but good on chinkbro for cashing in on white women
you have been brainwashed by propaganda.
the artist is referring to my little pony derivatives
oh
good on chinkbro for cashing in on loser overweight brony "men"
You're new here? Let me show you around
Just tell her not to post nudes online chud, this whiteknihting won't get you pussy. Let the world enjoy chink artists and ai
Stop posting pictures of yourself on public profiles moron
Not my problem goyim.
jesus, it's really horrible life to be a woman these days, lucky the op will never gonna be one
>yeah this random man I met was actually a haxxor with 3 million gigabytes graphics card and he was also the author of stable diffusion and it just so happened that he saw me, lusted after me and made me into a porn actress
It sounds terrible, but the story seems far fetched to me
>prostitute post her nude photos online
>regrets it
>IT WAS AI! IT WAS AI! IT WAS AI! I'M LITERALLY BEING RAPED HERE! AAAAAAAAAAAAAH HELP ME STATE
I've read this excuse a few times and it's so funny to me. What an absurd sounding story lmfao
>Buh buh buh- I'm not an Internet prostitute, the r-r-robot did it!!!!
Ironically if she had told the police it was 'revenge porn' they'd likely investigate it.
Good. Women are only useful for making realistic LORAs
Remember when parents told their children to never post personal or identifying information online? Imagine an internet like that.
>tfw when my mom was right once again
I always used to laugh at boomers for saying those kind of things and now that most kids are terminally online I realize our parents were right.
Most of those boomers are terminally online too nowadays it seems, putting hundreds of pictures of their grandkids on facebook.
Those boomers now believe that Bill Gates is literal Satan and shit like that. Zoomers are smarter than them even if they're terminally online.
>Those boomers now believe that Bill Gates is literal Satan and shit like that
based
What can a zoomer do that a boomer can't do? Because zoomers fall for the same exact propaganda just on the opposite side of things. And they're also tech illiterate. And they are so poor most of them will never own a home. Zoomers are just inferior boomers.
There's nothing I hate more than the word "app". Each time someone uses it, I have no idea what he is talking about.
Nobody does this. You're creating false realities in your mind and getting mad at them. Go outside.
jokes on you im too moronic to be gaslight
take your iphone and shove it up your ass homosexual
oh no, they immediately went to posting their own real info on faceberg, and even posted mine without my consent entirely.
Was a pipe dream 20 years ago. But the irony is if you foresaw the future and saved all those scantily clad photos of your high school classmates before they took them down years later, you've got all the source data you need.
I was a tad late but still scraped a few good images that I've now noticed have been deleted of my crush. And I've already trained a dataset and generated hundreds of images with em. My life is complete
Then: "Don't use your real name online, kids!"
Now: "OMG [service here] IS TRACKING US" *continues to use them anyway*
>even the fingers were fine
the only people aware of the shitty hands meme are stable diffusion users and buttmad artists
fake
>I am shaking
Is there anything you can't do in factorio?
Getting laid
no im pretty sure i can make a mod for that
>charge false rape case
>deepfake porn m'lady
>IS THIS REALLY WHAT LIFE AS A WOMAN HAS COME TO?
AI may solve their destructive behavior very soon as a weapon of mass penetration, mark my word.
Women should be banned.
Where's the tutorial?
Where does legislating against it end? Should it be illegal to imagine someone naked? If so then how to you prevent these powers being abused, since you have just set the precedent that the state is allowed to criminalize what goes on in your own mind, and thus by extension you have just set the precedent that the state is allowed to prosecute without evidence, since nobody can read minds and thus all thoughtcrime laws rely on hearsay. TL; DR, it's allowed because disallowing it introduces bugs everywhere else.
>Is this really what life as a woman has come to
I hope so. Anything you post online belongs to the internet now.
You have to be very popular online for someone to make porn of you, and it's easy to avoid being popular. If you are so sensitive about this kind of stuff, why even post online?
She has a right to the attention of hundreds or thousands of faceless strangers, chud.
feels like a false flag
Wait until she realizes someone can imagine having sex with her.
I'm literally shaking rn. How can you do something so evil?
>see almost perfect monitor for cheap shit price
>what's the catch
>27" 1080p
I'm still tempted. Anyone have a 27" 1080p monitor? Is it really that bad?
If you like it, get it. Sizewise is bigger than mine and i have 0 problems
you don't need more
I have a 32" 1080p. I love it.
I have a 27" 1080p monitor next a 4k 27" one
there is literally nothing wrong with it
just sit at a normal distance
>google the title
>it's from the femcel subreddit
lol
The good news is that she can offer the man who made the pictures to have sex with her instead of jerking off to the pictures and she can finally stop being a femcel
Why do people think they have a monopoly on their appearance? I've seen enough doppelgangers to not be that naive.
Ha! That's what you get for instant gratification!
>based AI destroying social media
where is the crime? why did she go to the police?
>didnt copyright her likeness
ngmi as an instagram prostitute
My sister doesn't post any pictures of her online. Crisis averted.
>even the fingers looked fine
>i am shaking
Obviously a fake post
This what the "nudify" threads on /b/ are about. Scammers pretend they want their friend or crush nudified, but really they just use them to scam thots - "give me $500 or I'll send this to your dad"
scamming thots doesn’t really pay off. those kweens are totally unjewable(can’t be scammed)
In the future, women will get requests to be "used" by men in their personal holodeck, some credits compensation will be applied to the girl for the experience. Think only fans, but a virtual experience that feels like the real thing.
There will be awkward encounters between men and women in the work place as they joke about having "used" one another, but it will be so normal that eventually the women will see it as flattering. Celebrities will cost extra, and global elites will bypass age restrictions and will be able to "use" girls inconspicuously without notifications or approval.
I think this might happen. Was thinking the other day it would be nice to simulate the one that got away due to distance and maybe go on a date of sorts. Was kind of thinking the ping way or like licensing yourself out.
It would actually probably end up solving many of the problems with modern relationships. People get bored, and you may want to frick the neighbours daughter/wife, and you would do so if your wife/girlfriend would let you, but of course most people don't want to loan out their own wife so you're stuck with "cheating." But if you could have your cake and eat it too those fantasises would likely be extinguished.
She is just mad that he got her naked pics without having to pay for her OnlyFans
Sex work is real work, Chud. When you steal her porn it's the same thing as stealing her wallet.
Digital data is not property, piracy is not stealing.
>the police
b***h just get your dad or brother to beat up the creep and put him in the hospital
The solution to this toxic masculinity is forced castration and feminization
If this worked trannies wouldn't be the biggest perverts on earth and disproportionately child predators.
a solution to this is ai robo waifus for men, then women won't have anything to do with us and nobody will "literally rape" them online or irl
>it was so uncanny valley. I’m literally shaking.
how are you so gullible
women
Does the AI do as well generating males? Asking for a friend.
This has been in the cards since the 90s, everyone knew it was coming, if you put your voice or face online you WANTED this to happen.
AI porn is kinda shit, she's overexagerrating. All of the DeepSwap on the web is paid version. If he's dumb enough to pay for porn, let him pay.
It's incredibly easy to make any woman nude now and actually pretty good with ControlNet inpainting.
The AI is still garbage at penises and veganas.
its bad at veganas but you just need to draw the outline and add a gradient and generate 1000 different images until you get a perfect one
I still dont get aesthetic gradients, wtf are they for
Tutorial?
seconding
it's that easy
Link to model?
Any realistic nude model
>I can now discreetly take pictures of coworkers and have nudes of them
Like I wouldn't even be fapping to them, they all have such basic b***h bodies. But what would get me off is the amount of seething that I, a disgusting ugly incel, would cause from knowing what they look like without clothes. Something that they were reserving for chad only.
I wouldn't recommend doing creepshots of your coworkers
Female hands typed this post.
Well in most jurisdictions creepshots are illegal and you will definitely get fired if you're caught doing it. Also it's not very smart to do this shit with real people before you do something in the real world that will get you arrested. Stick to thots on Instagram you don't know. I mean look at yourself, you're already contemplating committing a real crime for your perversion.
>noooooooooooo you can't take the heckin creepshots t-that's ILLEGAL
Kek imagine living somewhere where taking public photos of people is illegal. Also watch me not give a shit.
You'll give a shit when you're caught
It's not illegal to take pictures of people in public and it's not illegal to use AI software. Seethe more foid.
>fat incel with zero social skills
>take secret pictures of coworkers
Okay buddy, you'll not only not be completely obvious when you do it but you'll spill your spaghetti all over too.
Who needs creepshots when you have Google Meet calls with your coworkers?
>training ai on webcam pics
meh
Thanks kind anon
other way: open an image in paint, paint the head black and the rest white and use img2img upload inpaint. The black and white picture is your mask. Use DDIM with 45 sampling steps. Loopback is also good
Generative AI is deterministic. That porn was set into motion at the beginning of time, itself.
Cops are still public servants -and unionized ones at that - and will do everything in their power to not work.
She will have to hire a lawyer if she wants anything to happen.
She definitely has a case, maybe even a criminal one.
Why are women allowed on the internet?
>nooooooooooooooooooooo my pussy value is plummeting
AI just keeps getting more and more based.
Your all laughing but this is the kind of stuff that is going to make ai illegal in the west. Especially once the internet starts getting flooded with ai Anne frank porn
Good luck making open source projects illegal
>Especially once the internet starts getting flooded with ai Anne frank porn
You could make that today but nobody wants to see that shit
> You could make that today but nobody wants to see that shit
Too late, someone already did.
You're correct nobody wants to see it
Don't worry, ~~*openAI*~~ are working tirelessly to make sure AI won't engage in wrongthink.
>someone photoshops someone face into nude model
>I WAS RAPED
Normalgays deserve the rope
where can i see op girl porn? for science.
Unless you use it to blackmail and extract profit from the person there is nothing illegal.
There is absolutely nothing morally or legally wrong with generating art, pornographic or otherwise, based on a random person.
Showing it to them might be harassment and making it public could, depending on the circumstance, be slander or defacement, but that is more a lawyer situation than a police thing. The police are not there to be helping you with your problems.
I genuinely want to see "AI" porn to see how good it was. I have a hard time believing you can make something that convincing without some telltale signs it's AI
Give me an image, ideally in a normal pose
Random image I found on /soc/. I don't normally go there but I figured it was the best place to find pictures of people in a neutral pose.
My troon radar is going off here.
>My troon radar is going off here.
ding ding
that’s mel, fairly popular tripgay on /tttt/
what a coincidence
is also me in the picture
https://litter.catbox.moe/vsya4s.png
because I'm not a complete butthole I cropped the head, also the tan is free
Not bad, but I can see where the neck and chest separate as well as issues with skin tone. Could use some touchup in photoshop afterwards. Nice attempt.
Yeah I wasn't going to spend forever plus a black shirt is horrible to deal with, I had to color it with flesh tone first.
(And the AI is generally biased towards tanned women, so probably need a pale girls Lora to do it right)
All realistic models favor asians for some reason.
AI knows fat people are unhealthy, so it prefers skinny as a stick azns.
Coloring with flesh tone is outdated, though I am still working on perfecting the "mirror selfie" blur found in low quality pictures.
https://litter.catbox.moe/6ghj8j.png
This is garbage. It looks obviously fake (ai generated) and fake (implants)
I was doing this for years for free before AI was a thing. 90% of /r/ was for porn photoshops. I quit when apps like Snapchat starting making face swap apps that could get it nearly right. It was no longer a skill worth developing.
It's always been a thing and you're moronic to think it can be stopped
remember when we used to teach this?
yeah
but were dealing with people pic related in charge of tech companies
i wonder how this survey would be done in $current_year
legislature is solely controlled by womans feefees these days
enjoy getting your toys taken away from you because you just couldn't help yourselves
>these days
Why shouldn't it be allowed ? In fact, instagram should add a feature for that.
if you post your body online, that means you automatically consent to everything. it's the same as if an artist saw your photo and drew a nude of you, except more realistic and better
simple as
>I am shaking
This is a parody and one of you morons wrote this
lol someone can draw a nude portrait of yours without consequence. seethe and cope
I thought it was bold and empowering.
Don't worry, the government will start doing something in five years
why is every pledditor "shaking"? i thought it was a meme
I find the whole story implausible. I tried that sort of thing but at best it looks kinda similar. Even with textual inversions and a checkpoint that actually has seen the person before.
And I'm talking famous people. Like it will kinda look Milla Jovovich-ish.
How could it work with some random internet person?
It doesn't have to look exactly like the target to make people mad.
>we must ban drawing pictures!
normalgays need to hang themselves
women love
-alcohol
-sex
-money
-gossip
-public posturing
that's all. Women don't even love their kids. Kids are jsut a tool for them in order to smother them and delude themselves they are not loathsome.
You really have to understand women do only 2 things:
-with men they have sex
-and among women, they talk about the sex they had with men
there that's 100% the life of a woman .
women are inherently sexual perverts. Men don't like sex, men like the competition before and during sex and to see a girl orgasming due to their dicks, and for the atheists due to their tongues. Ie men love the competition and having a direct influence on the world. men dont love sex at all . It's only women who are hedonistic and sex cravings machines coasting thru life thanks to their orbiters
bot.
last paragraph is where it all falls apart.