People who care about AI safety are beyond fucking cringe.

People who care about “AI safety” are beyond fricking cringe.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nice try ChatGPT

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    its literally boomers that are scared of vidya and tech in general. they are so hilarious. out of touch old chuds

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine someone taking your image and making pornography with it. Imagine an artificial agent manipulating public opinion. Imagine not having to interact with your boss who already treats you like cattle. Imagine a completely atomized society.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      So most things will stay the same?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's going to get worse as no one cares.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine someone taking your image and making pornography with it.
      can be done without AI

      >Imagine an artificial agent manipulating public opinion.
      what does it matter if its artificial or not

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        "It can already be done" doesn't mean it can't get worse. I don't remember people making tons of porn with artists before dalle.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          you have shit memory or are a zoomer then deep fakes where a thing long before this newer AI stuff

          >can be done without AI
          a yes everyone and their mom knows who to morph images professionally!

          you absolute moron monkey, AI let's morons like (you) to make porn out of anyone

          eat a bullet moron, none of this stuff is new nor is that much easier to do because of AI

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >can be done without AI
        a yes everyone and their mom knows who to morph images professionally!

        you absolute moron monkey, AI let's morons like (you) to make porn out of anyone

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine someone taking your image and making pornography with it.
      Don't care.
      >Imagine an artificial agent manipulating public opinion.
      We already do that, just with people.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Okay then... frick the world.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          More frick you.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you only think about pornography? Are you 12 years old?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Of course you don't care, apart from being a nobody you're ugly and fat.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      These are all already status quo. So what's your point again? Did you have one?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        But don't think you'll be the one to take advantage of it. Israel published a false image to manipulate public opinion. Today it is still possible to verify the authenticity of the images. This may not be possible in the future.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's nothing. We lived through decades of not being able to verify authenticity of images. What's more insidious is the gradual narrative shaping that has been in place for the last decade via algorithms. Google, FB, et al influence what you see and don't see and they can do this with trivial AI that has already been commoditized.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            So you want to abandon any critical thinking in favor of frick-the-world?

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              That's an impressive strawman. I'm just saying all the stuff you're pearl clutching about is already realized so you need to find more material.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Are the protests against Israel also status quo?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >what is photoshop?
      you make OP look smart

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine not having to interact with your boss who already treats you like cattle.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        No matter how impersonal your boss is, he and your co-workers still need to physically interact with you, this has weight in the boss-employee relationship.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >you need to physically interact with boss and co-workers
          Uhh WFH chads? Our response?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine someone taking your image and making pornography with it.

      This, as similar situations eg, what if a video emerges of Putin claiming to have launched nuclear missiles etc, is simply not an issue.
      If AI gets to the point it can make convincing video, and everyone knows that it can make convincing video, then they will assumed to be false until validated.
      If someone made porn of me for their own pleasure, then more power to them.
      If someone made porn in an attempt to black mail me, or just humiliate me, then it simply won't work because everyone would know it's fake.
      In fact if genuine footage of me somehow got public it makes it easier to just say it's fake.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        how would you feel if you knew that all your friends and coworkers had seen or at least heard about a video of you engaging in some humiliating sexual act? even if you were sure that most of them thought it was fake, they'd still be thinking about it every time you talked to them, and joking about it behind your back.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's just not a situation that would happen. Noone wants to see porn of me, especially my coworkers and especially if they knew it was fake.
          The question is no sensical.
          This is schizo main character thinking that is completely delusional.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            okay sure, you're not attractive enough for anyone to want to see you naked, i'm not doubting that, but can you imagine that other people who are not you might feel differently from you if this happened to them?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      OHHHH MYYYYYYYYYYY G OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD MY COMPUTER IS GONNA DO A HECKIN RACISM

      NOT
      THE
      POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORN

      Why yes I do turn my TV on every night and see orgies of violence on prime time TV

      BUT WHAT IF MY COMPUTER THINKS ABOUT A TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT?!

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        For the first time I see myself as a person trying to preserve "morals and good manners". I'm getting old and bored.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          You want to preserve "morals and good manners" but you turn on your computer every night and see women and children being violently shot in any random video game.
          The important thing you should realize is that Sex should at least be as unconstrained as violence. You think it's poor manners or immoral to have a computer generate porn because you've been conditioned all your life to think wanton violence is far more wholesome than sex, because this is how we build good soldiers who enter the military to continue our wars overseas for resources. Sex doesn't do that.

          The computer generating any kind of violent or sexual imagery really isn't any more immoral than you seeing it in a video game. They're both as equally non-real. AI generated porn is at least unreal enough to not even involve another person.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            I understood your argument, but we don't have video games with children and women dying, bad example kek I hate violence. I don't want anyone in a war zone.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              > but we don't have video games with children and women dying,
              Yes we do. Where the hell have you been?
              https://steamcommunity.com/app/1716740/discussions/0/3824174554260139177/

              In modern games, the result of adding an equal number of women and men on the frontline means that the thing you're plastering into spaghetti with an assault rifle is 50% likely to be a woman. People noticed this as far back as the last Battlefield.
              And children, you don't know too much about modern games if you think that's not a thing you can do in games, now. Spec Ops: The Line had you genocide women and children as a story feature, and that was over ten years ago at this point.

              >I hate violence.
              Yet you don't complain about a medium that's exclusively about violence, instead focusing on its use that involves Sex. Curious!

              The thing I really just want is consistency. ALL of it is imaginary. Putting white powder on civilians in Spec Ops is just as imaginary as making a imaginary tit in your video card.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, I think I've lost the argument.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                I really don't think I'm trying to 'win' an argument, honestly, I don't. I hate the idea that arguments are made to be 'won'.

                I just think it's really silly how we've come to accept imaginary violence as being nothing to worry about but imaginary sex is worthy of changing the whole of how computers function just to prevent it from happening.
                Your point of view is perfectly valid, why should people be able to generate tons of CP using their graphics card? It's not a win or lose thing. It's just your point of view.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >imaginary violence as being nothing to worry about but imaginary sex is worthy
                The distinction relies on the bright line that mentally healthy people don't want to commit any violence, but they do want to have some sex. Seeing person A kill person B won't make you want to kill person B too, but seeing person A have sex with person B might make you want to have sex with person B. Fortunately mentally healthy people don't then plan to have sex with person B, especially not non-consensual sex, but that doesn't change the fact that the feelings generated by the two types of media are completely different.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Seeing person A kill person B won't make you want to kill person B too, but seeing person A have sex with person B might make you want to have sex with person B.
                ???

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you see an attractive person in a sexual or suggestive context, does that not make you think of them as someone who you could theoretically have sex with? Maybe you automatically think that about attractive people you see in non-sexual contexts too.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                While you're totally horny, I'm completely depressed.
                No, for all questions.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don't worry, November's nearly over.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well I DO want to frick my waifu, but she's just as imaginary as her breasts I generate in Stable Diffusion. Even if I shot her, it'd hurt me, but it would still be imaginary.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The distinction relies on the bright line that mentally healthy people don't want to commit any violence, but they do want to have some sex
                I am of the opinion that our caveman brains still believe Violence and sex are healthy parts of life. Normal people want to commit as much violence as the interred inmate, but the difference is they know their boundaries.

                Which is why, imaginary violence is really just fine. Who cares if I go imaginary hunting for some imaginary human who is my imaginary tribal outsider? None of it is real. It's as real in terms of violence as team sports simulating imaginary tribal wars that make our brains extremely happy when our imaginary tribe wins.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I hate the idea that arguments are made to be 'won'.
                And yet you act exactly as though you do. Curious.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I understood your argument, but we don't have video games with children and women dying,
              grandpa here thinks video games are still pong and pac-man. Jack Thompson was right in a lot of ways in that the race to be the most violent and psychopathic is a one-way street as games NEED to be more over-the-top and violent for marketing purposes.

              But having the government regulate them is still a really, really, really stupid idea.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Okay. Whats the problem?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        OP said there is no need for regulation, I don't think so. I may have difficulty predicting the impact of technology, but we can't deny that it will have an impact, for better or worse.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >OP said there is no need for regulation, I don't think so.
          Well then you're immensely short-sighted.

          You want THIS GUY and next year THAT GUY to tell YOU what YOU can or can't do with your computer?

          This guy already went on his cringe tirade against personal AI in a presentation so disconnected it may as well have been generated by an AI, and he was reading it from a script. That guy already said the #1 threat to gradeschoolers was video games a few years ago.

          And you want them regulating your computer at a level that would require government software to spy on your GPU?

          My man, you're insane, malevolent, or just moronic for wishing these things.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yea maybe im too old for this site, but this is been the recycled fear mongering about literally everything, then nothing happens.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      i literally don't care about any of that, i just want ai generated anime girls at any cost necessary

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >thousands must die

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      The obvious solution to all these practical problems is to just increase control and limit the technology so that only a few chosen megacorps can have it, provided they keep closely watching what you are doing with it. It does not sound like it's going to be all good.

      On the other hand, talking about muh existential risk is still just sci-fi fantasy. People can not even define what AGI is.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        The solution is for people involved in creating AIs to be aware of the impact of technology. If your vision is this, us vs the government and mega corporations, we are already in an AI war. The implications of this are many. We already live in a cyberpunk world.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, I'm not saying the scenario I described is the only possibility but it is definitely a tangible risk which you won't hear mentioned by people working in the big AI companies. There are other ways to eliminate the everyday AI risks such as anti-spoofing and AI detection. Impact awareness from developers is important so they do not unknowingly create potentially harmful tools.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >We already live in a cyberpunk world.
          It does look more and more like it every day though. These are interesting times.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            I think I'm too old to be the anti-hero in this story 🙁

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine someone taking your image and making pornography with it.
      hot

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      so... it all stays the same except I can have an AI wife?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine someone taking your image and making pornography with it.
      people have been doing this with photoshop for ages albeit

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      i understand the concerns about porn, but a lot of the chatter about disinformation and propaganda can already be done with human hands

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    But le terrorists could learn to build a bioweapon from an AI expert!!! We must keep it closed source for ~~*the good of humanity*~~!!!

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Evil? Danger? Poverty? Chaos? Ehhh
    >Cringe? Now that's what I'm truly against

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is cool. The only danger is CEOs misunderstanding how capable it is. But we'll see that all come crashing down in about 14-18 months.

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    its not AI, all censorship comes from israelites and their golems.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    No one in AI safety cares about near-term misuse. They care about X-risk.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      What about all those congressional hearing that are happening right now about muh deep fakes and muh Russia? What about yud and those homosexuals want to restrict consumer GPU usage?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yud cares about X-risk and only X-risk. Your impression of him as concerned about Deepfakes (expect inasmuch as it suggests we will handle the X-risk poorly) is the product of a propaganda campaign by Meta and several other actors, and several out of context tweets. He wants to ban AI R&D and limit GPU production because he doesn't see any way of solving the technical problem in time.

        You can see his actual views on the technical problem here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/uMQ3cqWDPHhjtiesc/agi-ruin-a-list-of-lethalities

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Conspiracy theory?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            See

            Sounds like cope. Yud is a homosexual and should be ignored.

            for an example of such a victim of the PR campaign. The idea that Eliezer, who started working on AI alignment in 2003, is in it because of *deepfake scares* is mindblowing, but most people cannot critically think about what they are told by twitter and so this psyop is quite effective

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not repeating the theories of the fat israelite. I see people losing their jobs because they want unrestricted AI, when everything around us has regulations, but for some reason AI is completely safe... I'm not saying the world shouldn't progress, but they're trying to do it irresponsibly. And remember the American embargoes on China, materials will become more expensive because of the irresponsible attitude of the government.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              The irony here is that Yud would be far more credible if he *did* care about AI dangers that are actually realistic and plausible, such as deepfake scares, instead of his schizophrenic apocalyptic sci-fi fantasies.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like cope. Yud is a homosexual and should be ignored.

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    what they mean is "we don't want you goy to have this power"

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Gpt4 doesn't provide any critical information. They will never want an intelligence that tends to absolute facts. They'll only have bread and circuses.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        it writse code

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    letting you use AI to make hate memes is unsafe you fricking goy

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOO YOUR LLM CANT JUST SAY Black person ITS NOT FAIR YOU WILL APPLY OUR SAFETY FILTERS OR THE CENTER FOR WHATS GOOD AND SAFE FOR THE CHILDREN WILL HAVE YOU SHUT DOWN
    These are the people with board seats

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    People who love AI are fricking cringe

  13. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    i don't even know what the frick that is supposed to mean. Is it some real threat like an actual event horizon (I strongly doubt that), or just some fear that the ai may say Black person at some point?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      the latter
      Black folk replaced the children western society tends for

  14. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most of em? Sure. All of them? Reaching.

  15. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just don't want non-whites or women to have access to AI

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can I ask you why?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Its pretty obvious.
        >baltimore before blacks
        >public schools before blacks
        >the internet before blacks
        >video games before blacks
        They move in, the quality goes out.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm white with light eyes. The West is full of unscrupulous, white, light-eyed people. Frick them both.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Okay. That doesnt negate what I said.

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >imma literal cuck

  16. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Literally just don't give AI arms lol. Just no legs. Brain in a jar lmao.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *