I think the photo is just heavily edited, there are many suspicious spots. the blurry hand isn't actually suspicious to me. I don't think this is AI however.
and this is why cryptographic signatures are going to become necessary VERY SOON. as soon as someone argues in court that "you can't know if any picture or video is real anymore due to AI, watch this", it's game over.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>Only government should be allowed to doctor images goy
2 months ago
Anonymous
>generate picture with AI >crypto sign it using some secret snoy key >it is now a legitimate picture taken with a sony camera
2 months ago
Anonymous
>cryptographic signatures are going to become necessary VERY SOON
correct. this was announced last december
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Nikon-Sony-and-Canon-fight-AI-fakes-with-new-camera-tech >Nikon, Sony Group and Canon are developing camera technology that embeds digital signatures in images so that they can be distinguished from increasingly sophisticated fakes.
first it will only be mandatory for journalists and maybe forensics, but once Apple support it in their phones, there will be pressure on social media companies to put warnings on images that don't have digital signatures from ~~*trusted*~~ manufacturers
if the private key for any device leaks, then all images taken by that device will be retroactively marked as potentially faked. if the manufacturer key leaks, then all devices from that manufacturer will have to be recalled.
2 months ago
Anonymous
someone will just approve a Chinese key and then all bets are off. it's not possible to use cryptography in this way without having to trust SOMEONE. and we all know you can't trust anyone.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>someone will just approve a Chinese key and then all bets are off
the list of ~~*trusted*~~ manufacturers will be maintained by an ~~*independent*~~ and ~~*diverse*~~ group of ~~*experts*~~ who will instantly revoke the keys of any manufacturer who doesn't do enough to prevent ~~*misinformation*~~ from spreading
2 months ago
Anonymous
depressingly likely
cells interlinked
do you trust cloudflare? interlinked
2 months ago
Anonymous
Not happening, this would mark shopped images. Celebrities would literally die if an unshopped photo of them was ever released
2 months ago
Anonymous
>this would mark shopped images
that's a valid criticism, except Photoshop will support this standard too. it will add its own digital signature, and only run when the OS is loaded with secure boot enabled, to prevent tampering. the metadata will also include the registration details of the Photoshop or Windows account, so that any deceptive image can be traced back to its creator with a warrant.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>photoshop photo >print it out or display it in high quality screen >take photo of it with approved camera
what now?
If the camera manufacturer is extra moronic you could hijack the sensor directly for better results
2 months ago
Anonymous
>print it out
i doubt you could take a photo of a printout and have it look as realistic as a photo of a real scene, and these cameras will probably include stereoscopic information to record whether the subject is flat or not. anyway, you'd have to rely on your printer not including these
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code
2 months ago
Anonymous
Won't matter, I make glass plate photographs and I could easily transfer negatives printed from AI images onto glass plates and then donate the supposedly historical photos to a local library or something and at some point someone will think they're real history and all of history has changed.
2 months ago
Anonymous
ah, the analog hole is back
2 months ago
Anonymous
>cryptographic signatures
Won't matter. Paranoid schizos will just keep on keeping on.
>that pics fake because aliens broke the cryptographic stereo encoding upside the vorpal tunneling by way of iced ham
2 months ago
Anonymous
schizos don't hold up in court, that's what I was talking about
It looks like it could be made by stitching images together to make a wider image, like a panoramic feature. Most of the suspicious spots are vertical motion and overlap in some part of the image.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_stitching
2 months ago
Anonymous
I don't think it's about getting a bigger photo, they just tried to combine the best parts of a bunch of shots taken of them sitting there to get something better than they could do with a single shot and fricked up.
Why has no one pointed out the girl's skirt overlapping her brother's finger?
I'm talking about her right hip (to the left of the image) and her brother's left hand (to the right of the image).
If the hem of her skirt is really that loose, it's in danger of falling down.
Boy's right hand.
Counter on the left doesn't even make sense being there.
Weird tiling on the ground.
Weird background layout. (They're in some kind of patio that transitions into a nonsense lawn in a weird way, but there is a tree between the patio and the yard, which we cannot see the base of for some reason?)
Also the amount of detail in the background is oddly dense in a way reminiscent of AI.
https://i.imgur.com/yCwk8IT.png
look harder. of course the hands are fine
It's a real picture, but the royal family is just so inbred that their hands are all fricked up like that
>It's not. AI can't do motion blur realistically, the mothers right hand kinda tells me it's a real photo.
Middleton's Razor: When faced with two possible explanations, AI Inpainting or MS Paint, MS Paint is most likely to be true.
The teeth look weird but children's teeth are weird. Her hands seem slightly longer than possible but it might be an illusion. The boy's right hand fingers are in a super weird shape but again children can be weird like that
I'd say either real or real but passed through an AI powered filter. Don't newer smartphones automatically AI upscale every photo?
Boy's right hand.
Counter on the left doesn't even make sense being there.
Weird tiling on the ground.
Weird background layout. (They're in some kind of patio that transitions into a nonsense lawn in a weird way, but there is a tree between the patio and the yard, which we cannot see the base of for some reason?)
Also the amount of detail in the background is oddly dense in a way reminiscent of AI.
you can filter every tripgay, so it doesn't matter what trip you have
I recommend it to everyone, use BOTx
go to Settings > Filter > Tripcode and enter /^!/, and nothing of value is lost
yeah its the magic dark clothing behind the red sweater she's wearing
if there's no one behind her, where does the dark clothing come from?
>where does the dark clothing come from?
kate's sleeve hanging down from her hand
if it were to be ai generated that would be ground breaking
however one would have to assume its not: > the fingers are perfect (yes, i saw the comments, you are moronic) and in convoluted positions, not just resting > has motion blur > consisntent, but not obvious reflections > the floor does that have "ai cleanness" > the people depicted look similar, but not in a creepy face cloning way > perfect shoe ties > symmetric ears > zipper doesnt randomly change side > proper focus
Extremely clearly NOT ai, and anyone who has any doubts about that is a fricking moron. Spend the 5 seconds it takes to figure out the hands actually make perfect sense.
Hey
Wasnt there some guy who got arrested because the police claimed he abducted and killed a teenage girl, no body found ever, and the guy then went to /misc/ and was trying to explain how the teenage girl's facebook profile was basically all fake AI generated by some state actors like CIA to lock him up.
It was quite interesting, look it up i hope someone finds those threads.
Back then around 2016 nobody heard of full on AI generation of a person so the girl's pics were kinda weird and some of them had the same flaws a modern Dalle has, people were like >oh look that plant or that hand arent quite right
But due to this consumer technology not officially "existing" back then, everyone was like >ehh some of her pics look weird but youre crazy bro you cant just generate a person
>thispersondoesnotexist was registered at the start of 2019
and now we have this
https://readwrite.com/onlyfake-the-deepfake-site-churning-out-sophisticated-fake-ids/
"Using what it describes as neural networks to produce counterfeit documents for just $15, this enterprise threatens to significantly disrupt the market for forgeries with an obvious knock-on effect on identity verification procedures online."
this is why Apple will introduce digital signatures for the iPhone camera, and online id companies will require you to use a phone that will include these sigs
I think the photo is just heavily edited, there are many suspicious spots. the blurry hand isn't actually suspicious to me. I don't think this is AI however.
Only right answers, everyone else just proved themselves to be subhumans lacking a visual cortex
The top 1/3 of the image is original, it was "extended" by AI. All the artifacts appear beneath the top 1/3. Likely because Kate would not be able to wear jeans and boots after abdominal surgery (trust me, you wouldn't). News sites are still posting articles with the top part of the image, it was only the "full" image that was killed
That's Catherine Princess of Wales to you shitskins
The top 1/3 of the image is original, it was "extended" by AI. All the artifacts appear beneath the top 1/3. Likely because Kate would not be able to wear jeans and boots after abdominal surgery (trust me, you wouldn't). News sites are still posting articles with the top part of the image, it was only the "full" image that was killed
It's a real pic that's been overprocessed by whatever shitty AI enhancing magic they're putting into cameras nowadays. Like, there was one where someone took a photo of the Hollywood sign with an iPhone and it fricked the text up so it said like Holywdoodnv or something...
/misc/ did a decent job of picking it apart and the newswires have all pulled the photo
I'm sure it's standard for them to pretty up every pr photo but what I don't get is how the royal family would employ someone so shitty at photoshop
>'ave ye got a loicense for that sloppa?
lol
if it were just regular photoshop editing, would they still do the same thing? doesnt confirm AI, but makes it more suspicious to me. this is what everythings going to be like moving forward, isn't it? infinity gaslight
I think its real, just with photoshop work on top, leaving some strange artifacts like her zipper being misaligned, the sweater pattern, etc. As for AI, the tile pattern is too continuous to be AI generated, the chair supports are suspiciously continuous, and the fact that the kid in the back's feet are partially obstructed by the chair makes it seem like its legit. The kid on the right has his fingers in an unnatural position but it's not like its anatomically fricked. AI can't do continuity for shit so that's usually the go-to sign. The loose strands of messy hair is also something AI can't do and make it look realistic.
just poorly done photo editing and photographer
dunno if its cause of low quality jpeg, but the kid behind Kate is ever so slightly out of focus
all that compositing/editing and still couldn't focus stack, sad!
It's probably all default Photoshop blending and compositing. I bet this shit will be fingerprinted to a recent version of Photoshop, assuming anybody is allowed to do it, live, and publish it...
That’s an interesting question. Based on the web search results1, it seems that some photo agencies have pulled the photo released by Kensington Palace on Mother’s Day, citing concerns that it has been manipulated or edited. The Associated Press (AP) said that the photo shows an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand2. Some social media users also pointed out other possible signs of alteration, such as Kate Middleton’s missing wedding ring, her long arms, and part of Princess Charlotte’s arm being invisible3.
However, these claims are not conclusive, and there is no official confirmation from Kensington Palace or the photo’s source that the image was artificially generated or modified. It is possible that the photo was edited for aesthetic or technical reasons, such as enhancing the lighting, color, or contrast, or removing unwanted elements. Such editing is common and acceptable in professional photography, as long as it does not alter the meaning or context of the image4.
To determine if the image was generated by AI, one would need to use specialized tools or methods, such as reverse image search, image forensics, or deepfake detection. These tools can help identify the source, origin, and quality of the image, and detect any signs of manipulation, such as inconsistencies, artifacts, or anomalies. However, these tools are not always reliable or accurate, and they might not be able to detect sophisticated or subtle forms of AI-generated images5.
frick the rest of the photo. people just going to ignore this hard straight line on the side of her face? clearly edited photo. proof of that also with her left arm.
>2024 >people surprised that images are edited, sometimes badly
Air brushed images have been around for over 2 decades. Why the frick would people assume they're suddenly straight off camera images? Every selfy I see is smoothed to frick, most people haven't shared a natural image of themselves in well over a decade.
It wouldn't surprise me if this image is a composite of several images and they took the best expressions and merged them into one image. Having said that, it's still a sloppy photoshop job, not AI generated.
>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68534359 >Kate photo: Princess of Wales says she edited Mother's Day picture recalled by agencies
Literally a fricking nothing burger. Dumb b***h bought a camera and is now pretending to be a photographer.
She's also not "The Princess of Wales" because Principalities don't have such a title.
I hate how the English LARP as European Royalty when they don't even know what titles mean.
She's come out and said she edited it herself but I doubt it was her. Somethings going on with Kate she's either ill or thinking about leaving big willy style
>well, what do the BOT experts think?
The royals family barbecues their children for moloch so how can she take a picture with them? They must be actors or CGI generated.
Also presumably the royal family have access to more powerful LLMs than anon. If only because they are less likely to waste compute power on “stinky smelly braphog feet mmm yes so dirty stinky feet” prompts.
My theory is she and Austin and perhaps others we haven't found out about yet were in the Ukraine to spread some money, weapons, and Christmas cheer to their allies, and there was some kind of strike that got 'em. Since they all have mysterious problems with the lower half of their bodies, my thinking is they were rushing into a bunker and made it past a blast door, but it didn't go down all the way and was cracked at the bottom, then the Khinzal hit and hot gas and debris rushed in through the gap, burning and peppering the people in the area with debris. But because the opening was quite low, the damage was concentrated on the lower parts of their bodies.
i dont really care but.
impressive still
Ruh roh
that looks more like shit Photoshop than AI
There is no problem there, the hand and finger positions are perfectly coherent. Is your visual cortex broken?
look harder. of course the hands are fine
it's probably something to do with the camera processing, this hand is blurry
I think the photo is just heavily edited, there are many suspicious spots. the blurry hand isn't actually suspicious to me. I don't think this is AI however.
and this is why cryptographic signatures are going to become necessary VERY SOON. as soon as someone argues in court that "you can't know if any picture or video is real anymore due to AI, watch this", it's game over.
>Only government should be allowed to doctor images goy
>generate picture with AI
>crypto sign it using some secret snoy key
>it is now a legitimate picture taken with a sony camera
>cryptographic signatures are going to become necessary VERY SOON
correct. this was announced last december
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Nikon-Sony-and-Canon-fight-AI-fakes-with-new-camera-tech
>Nikon, Sony Group and Canon are developing camera technology that embeds digital signatures in images so that they can be distinguished from increasingly sophisticated fakes.
first it will only be mandatory for journalists and maybe forensics, but once Apple support it in their phones, there will be pressure on social media companies to put warnings on images that don't have digital signatures from ~~*trusted*~~ manufacturers
if the private key for any device leaks, then all images taken by that device will be retroactively marked as potentially faked. if the manufacturer key leaks, then all devices from that manufacturer will have to be recalled.
someone will just approve a Chinese key and then all bets are off. it's not possible to use cryptography in this way without having to trust SOMEONE. and we all know you can't trust anyone.
>someone will just approve a Chinese key and then all bets are off
the list of ~~*trusted*~~ manufacturers will be maintained by an ~~*independent*~~ and ~~*diverse*~~ group of ~~*experts*~~ who will instantly revoke the keys of any manufacturer who doesn't do enough to prevent ~~*misinformation*~~ from spreading
depressingly likely
cells interlinked
do you trust cloudflare? interlinked
Not happening, this would mark shopped images. Celebrities would literally die if an unshopped photo of them was ever released
>this would mark shopped images
that's a valid criticism, except Photoshop will support this standard too. it will add its own digital signature, and only run when the OS is loaded with secure boot enabled, to prevent tampering. the metadata will also include the registration details of the Photoshop or Windows account, so that any deceptive image can be traced back to its creator with a warrant.
>photoshop photo
>print it out or display it in high quality screen
>take photo of it with approved camera
what now?
If the camera manufacturer is extra moronic you could hijack the sensor directly for better results
>print it out
i doubt you could take a photo of a printout and have it look as realistic as a photo of a real scene, and these cameras will probably include stereoscopic information to record whether the subject is flat or not. anyway, you'd have to rely on your printer not including these
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code
Won't matter, I make glass plate photographs and I could easily transfer negatives printed from AI images onto glass plates and then donate the supposedly historical photos to a local library or something and at some point someone will think they're real history and all of history has changed.
ah, the analog hole is back
>cryptographic signatures
Won't matter. Paranoid schizos will just keep on keeping on.
>that pics fake because aliens broke the cryptographic stereo encoding upside the vorpal tunneling by way of iced ham
schizos don't hold up in court, that's what I was talking about
>some editor looked at the original photo and thought "this kid's wrists are too fat, make them thinner"
What a world we live in. Literal brainrot.
Close to 80% obesity rates, that is brainrot. If it was me, fat women would pay metabo tax.
overweight and obesity*
It looks like it could be made by stitching images together to make a wider image, like a panoramic feature. Most of the suspicious spots are vertical motion and overlap in some part of the image.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_stitching
I don't think it's about getting a bigger photo, they just tried to combine the best parts of a bunch of shots taken of them sitting there to get something better than they could do with a single shot and fricked up.
I don't get the one in the girl's stomach
some fricked up motif?
That whole windows looks normal, it's just white paint on the edges.
Why has no one pointed out the girl's skirt overlapping her brother's finger?
I'm talking about her right hip (to the left of the image) and her brother's left hand (to the right of the image).
If the hem of her skirt is really that loose, it's in danger of falling down.
it's just a folded skirt
you forgot
yeah its the magic dark clothing behind the red sweater she's wearing
if there's no one behind her, where does the dark clothing come from?
It's a real picture, but the royal family is just so inbred that their hands are all fricked up like that
Because they have no clue what AI-generated images look like. That picture obviously isn't AI-generated.
This isn't an AI generation artifact though. It's from the algorithm that picks which of the 752,835 cameras to read a pixel from.
yeah nice legs, my thinking exactly
photoshop
Clearly hand was photoshoped in.
It's not. AI can't do motion blur realistically, the mothers right hand kinda tells me it's a real photo.
It's a pity about her son's right hand, then.
ai has been able to do hands for almost two years mongrel
we aren't at dalle 2 anymore
>ai has been able to do hands for almost two years mongrel
But somehow no one ever shows the proof.
>ai has been able to do hands for almost two years mongrel
He just has his middle two fingers crossed. It's clearly a real image.
Real.
Good catch.
I was looking at the dirt in the corners and on the sill. AI tends to omit that sort of thing or make it look inorganic.
>It's not. AI can't do motion blur realistically, the mothers right hand kinda tells me it's a real photo.
Middleton's Razor: When faced with two possible explanations, AI Inpainting or MS Paint, MS Paint is most likely to be true.
The teeth look weird but children's teeth are weird. Her hands seem slightly longer than possible but it might be an illusion. The boy's right hand fingers are in a super weird shape but again children can be weird like that
I'd say either real or real but passed through an AI powered filter. Don't newer smartphones automatically AI upscale every photo?
>The teeth look weird but children's teeth are weird. Her hands seem slightly longer than possible but it might be an illusion
They are just british
Terrible paint job on the window frames.
Boy's right hand.
Counter on the left doesn't even make sense being there.
Weird tiling on the ground.
Weird background layout. (They're in some kind of patio that transitions into a nonsense lawn in a weird way, but there is a tree between the patio and the yard, which we cannot see the base of for some reason?)
Also the amount of detail in the background is oddly dense in a way reminiscent of AI.
It's real no question. Look at the lighting and quintessentially British teeth.
looks real 2 me
There is no greater pleasure I get on this website than filtering tripgays. Goodbye.
I actually just decided to change to a new one, so here's my new one for you to filter.
you can filter every tripgay, so it doesn't matter what trip you have
I recommend it to everyone, use BOTx
go to Settings > Filter > Tripcode and enter /^!/, and nothing of value is lost
>where does the dark clothing come from?
kate's sleeve hanging down from her hand
Nobody cares you dipshit dweeb
The boy right behind her is Elon Musk's child, right?
if it were to be ai generated that would be ground breaking
however one would have to assume its not:
> the fingers are perfect (yes, i saw the comments, you are moronic) and in convoluted positions, not just resting
> has motion blur
> consisntent, but not obvious reflections
> the floor does that have "ai cleanness"
> the people depicted look similar, but not in a creepy face cloning way
> perfect shoe ties
> symmetric ears
> zipper doesnt randomly change side
> proper focus
Extremely clearly NOT ai, and anyone who has any doubts about that is a fricking moron. Spend the 5 seconds it takes to figure out the hands actually make perfect sense.
It's not AI but still looks sketchy. Even non-photographic things like wrong season in the plant in the background.
people dont seem to remember that Photoshop exists.
agreed, lots of picrel and maybe some blur. What's confusing is why there's so much editing in the the first place.
It looks like they got some intern to clean up the photo and he went overboard with all the new things he learned on youtube
Hey
Wasnt there some guy who got arrested because the police claimed he abducted and killed a teenage girl, no body found ever, and the guy then went to /misc/ and was trying to explain how the teenage girl's facebook profile was basically all fake AI generated by some state actors like CIA to lock him up.
It was quite interesting, look it up i hope someone finds those threads.
Back then around 2016 nobody heard of full on AI generation of a person so the girl's pics were kinda weird and some of them had the same flaws a modern Dalle has, people were like
>oh look that plant or that hand arent quite right
But due to this consumer technology not officially "existing" back then, everyone was like
>ehh some of her pics look weird but youre crazy bro you cant just generate a person
thispersondoesnotexist was registered at the start of 2019
>thispersondoesnotexist was registered at the start of 2019
and now we have this
https://readwrite.com/onlyfake-the-deepfake-site-churning-out-sophisticated-fake-ids/
"Using what it describes as neural networks to produce counterfeit documents for just $15, this enterprise threatens to significantly disrupt the market for forgeries with an obvious knock-on effect on identity verification procedures online."
this is why Apple will introduce digital signatures for the iPhone camera, and online id companies will require you to use a phone that will include these sigs
more potential fucckery. again I don't care, but its obviously some photo manipulation, not necessarily AI.
Only right answers, everyone else just proved themselves to be subhumans lacking a visual cortex
kate is so pretty i wish she was my wife
That's Catherine Princess of Wales to you shitskins
You're a poor nobody and have zero connection to the royals.
The top 1/3 of the image is original, it was "extended" by AI. All the artifacts appear beneath the top 1/3. Likely because Kate would not be able to wear jeans and boots after abdominal surgery (trust me, you wouldn't). News sites are still posting articles with the top part of the image, it was only the "full" image that was killed
Who cares?
It's a real pic that's been overprocessed by whatever shitty AI enhancing magic they're putting into cameras nowadays. Like, there was one where someone took a photo of the Hollywood sign with an iPhone and it fricked the text up so it said like Holywdoodnv or something...
AI artifacts dont look like that, honestly not sure what's going on i think it's just post processing
What did you use to make this?
it's fotoforensics
How is this technique called then?
youre a fricking cretin
Sorry for not knowing everything you fricking Black person. I'm here to learn something about technology.
error level analysis
Thanks
/misc/ did a decent job of picking it apart and the newswires have all pulled the photo
I'm sure it's standard for them to pretty up every pr photo but what I don't get is how the royal family would employ someone so shitty at photoshop
The photo has now been recalled because the image source (HRH Prince of Wales) has edited it.
/misc/ was right.
>Shut it down!
/misc/ is always right
Okay moron. No they're no-
>'ave ye got a loicense for that sloppa?
lol
if it were just regular photoshop editing, would they still do the same thing? doesnt confirm AI, but makes it more suspicious to me. this is what everythings going to be like moving forward, isn't it? infinity gaslight
I think its real, just with photoshop work on top, leaving some strange artifacts like her zipper being misaligned, the sweater pattern, etc. As for AI, the tile pattern is too continuous to be AI generated, the chair supports are suspiciously continuous, and the fact that the kid in the back's feet are partially obstructed by the chair makes it seem like its legit. The kid on the right has his fingers in an unnatural position but it's not like its anatomically fricked. AI can't do continuity for shit so that's usually the go-to sign. The loose strands of messy hair is also something AI can't do and make it look realistic.
Idk who that is but those little fellas look autistic af
their bloodline needs to become extinct
just poorly done photo editing and photographer
dunno if its cause of low quality jpeg, but the kid behind Kate is ever so slightly out of focus
all that compositing/editing and still couldn't focus stack, sad!
It's probably all default Photoshop blending and compositing. I bet this shit will be fingerprinted to a recent version of Photoshop, assuming anybody is allowed to do it, live, and publish it...
It's pretty obviously real
I think that's not the AI photo I want to see of Kate Middleton, post the nudes
There's a topless pic of her but I can't find the unedited version on Google which is weird because I saw it recently. Can't remember what app though.
Looks like bad photoediting, not the kind of mistakes ai makes.
I would love to see a Kate Middleton porn
Just popping in to remind everyone of her sister.
Looks like a twink
That’s an interesting question. Based on the web search results1, it seems that some photo agencies have pulled the photo released by Kensington Palace on Mother’s Day, citing concerns that it has been manipulated or edited. The Associated Press (AP) said that the photo shows an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand2. Some social media users also pointed out other possible signs of alteration, such as Kate Middleton’s missing wedding ring, her long arms, and part of Princess Charlotte’s arm being invisible3.
However, these claims are not conclusive, and there is no official confirmation from Kensington Palace or the photo’s source that the image was artificially generated or modified. It is possible that the photo was edited for aesthetic or technical reasons, such as enhancing the lighting, color, or contrast, or removing unwanted elements. Such editing is common and acceptable in professional photography, as long as it does not alter the meaning or context of the image4.
To determine if the image was generated by AI, one would need to use specialized tools or methods, such as reverse image search, image forensics, or deepfake detection. These tools can help identify the source, origin, and quality of the image, and detect any signs of manipulation, such as inconsistencies, artifacts, or anomalies. However, these tools are not always reliable or accurate, and they might not be able to detect sophisticated or subtle forms of AI-generated images5.
it's simply not possible for ai to make 4 people's faces look realistic. we are not at that stage yet.
obviously fake ai white privilege propaganda down with the patriach!!!!
frick the rest of the photo. people just going to ignore this hard straight line on the side of her face? clearly edited photo. proof of that also with her left arm.
>2024
>people surprised that images are edited, sometimes badly
Air brushed images have been around for over 2 decades. Why the frick would people assume they're suddenly straight off camera images? Every selfy I see is smoothed to frick, most people haven't shared a natural image of themselves in well over a decade.
It wouldn't surprise me if this image is a composite of several images and they took the best expressions and merged them into one image. Having said that, it's still a sloppy photoshop job, not AI generated.
It has to be, how can a family be this ugly if they have royal blood? These kids look like they picked from the streets in the Norf.
>These kids look like they picked from the streets in the Norf.
Yeah because there's no white kids in the souf innit
>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68534359
>Kate photo: Princess of Wales says she edited Mother's Day picture recalled by agencies
Literally a fricking nothing burger. Dumb b***h bought a camera and is now pretending to be a photographer.
im not sold
She's also not "The Princess of Wales" because Principalities don't have such a title.
I hate how the English LARP as European Royalty when they don't even know what titles mean.
The title Princess of Wales is older than every surviving principality in the world you absolute fricking imbecile
Nta but I'm Canadian and know frick all about the monarchy, their family etc. until this post I thought the black girl was the queen to be.
Is there any AI capable of texture yet? All attempts I have seen make any texture look like coarse leather.
She's come out and said she edited it herself but I doubt it was her. Somethings going on with Kate she's either ill or thinking about leaving big willy style
This morning she came out and admitted she edited it herself.
Got to give her credit in 1500 years of British royal history she's undoubtedly the first ever to get called out for shitty Photoshop editing skills.
>well, what do the BOT experts think?
The royals family barbecues their children for moloch so how can she take a picture with them? They must be actors or CGI generated.
Charlotte's really looking like old Lizzy here
I want to frick Kate so bad it's unreal
i can't dispute numbers like that, but shoulder buttons aren't an AI invention
"photo of princess of wales and her 3 kids posing for a nice family photo"
What are you trying to imply here? So many ways one could take it.
Hmm. Why does it default to asian children?
Also presumably the royal family have access to more powerful LLMs than anon. If only because they are less likely to waste compute power on “stinky smelly braphog feet mmm yes so dirty stinky feet” prompts.
Looks real but taken with a phone that does some weird processing.
My theory is she and Austin and perhaps others we haven't found out about yet were in the Ukraine to spread some money, weapons, and Christmas cheer to their allies, and there was some kind of strike that got 'em. Since they all have mysterious problems with the lower half of their bodies, my thinking is they were rushing into a bunker and made it past a blast door, but it didn't go down all the way and was cracked at the bottom, then the Khinzal hit and hot gas and debris rushed in through the gap, burning and peppering the people in the area with debris. But because the opening was quite low, the damage was concentrated on the lower parts of their bodies.
AI tech from the highest source is almost original like your reality
The buttons on the kid's sweater are a bit odd
On the neck and shoulder