OPENAI IS KILL

>Be "Open"AI
>Spend $700K per day for chudGPT
>forecasts predict bankruptcy by 2024
Buy a fricking graphics card

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Microsoft will save them.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      dont know about this. microsoft owns openai's frontier product already, they could just pick up their best engineers, start their own AI division and let openai die.

  2. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well yeah, I mean, what did people think was going to happen?
    > ChatGPT alone requires an entire datacenter full of $40,000 videocards running at capacity to work
    > Backlash against LLMs is growing, government beginning to regulate it
    > Corporations realizing that they can't replace humans with an LLM because it will embarass the frick out of them (see: MS posting an article on MSN yesterday about traveling to Ottawa where it recommended visiting a food bank)

    LLMs are a toy and for low-quality coom material, nothing more.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Last part seems to blame it for being woke. What about troony-free ones?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What about troony-free ones?
        CAI is kill

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        There aren't any yet. Each one blocks sex and edginess because there's a cabal of woke antisexuals in control of the AI industry. That's why Replika did a 180 and started banning sex and posting "bennygrams" after getting access to a larger model.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Replika switched to GPT3.5 so they had to ban sex as part of OAIs access policy. They unironically thought having more eloquent dialogue would make people be okay with being railroaded into G-rated RP with their Replikas.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, but the suspicious part was how they then started posting the exact same language as Benny. "Safety", as if having sex with an AI is somehow dangerous. They weren't just made to ban sex. They were made to post the same creepy cultist language as well.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Here's the thing. Because I've worked my way up the coom-tech ladder, first as a consumer, then as a tavern-card maker and right now I'm a model tuner.
              It's funny because 10 years ago I was fairly firmly planted on the center-left. And the left was all about "sex positive culture". And now with Ai sex-gen suddenly that sex positivity has completely dried up. The lefty types are suddenly sexual puritans. It's because there's no real value being adhered to which is what drove me away from the left in general.
              Here's what they're defending:
              The reality is historically unfrickable men (of which I'm not one. I was actually married at one point in my life and there's about 2 dozen notches in my belt. blah blah blah closeted homosexual blah blah blah overcompensation which is why I'm kind of adverse to actual physical intimacy at this point in my life(really just to establish my unique insight in the world of coomgen since let's be real here, most of the people who use coomgen are perma-incels).

              So back to the main point. Historically... People with either veganas or money enjoy a sense of entitlement to lord over unfrickable men. They are the ultimate fodder. You can easily lead them on with the undelivered promise of getting their dick wet.
              And then along comes this technology that is 'good enough' to make them say "frick it."
              They don't want to be a simp anymore.
              They don't want to be scammed by penis enlargement bullshit anymore.
              They don't want some porn industry CEO manipulating what they should and shouldn't jack off to.
              That avenue of manipulation has been cut off. And that's what they are pissed off about. That's what they are trying to stop with all this puritanical bullshit.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                But AI sex is popular with women due to their enjoyment of erotica. On /r/characterai_nsfw, about 30% of the posters are women, which is greater than the distribution on Reddit in general, 25.8%.
                https://old.reddit.com/r/CharacterAi_NSFW/comments/104iydh/a_poll_about_which_gender_is_using_cai_for_nsfw/
                https://blog.gitnux.com/reddit-user-statistics/

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                25% Males who claim to be women online due to their sick homosexual fetishes.
                5% of the lowest value femcel landwhales.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                They're bio-women, there was an "other" option in the poll.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                "Other" is for attack helicopters, not for trans women.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >30% of the posters are women
                let me check my math.
                Oh, yes. Let's see. There we go. Apparently that's not a majority, so my point still stands.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                So you think only 26% of people in the world are women since that's the percentage on reddit?

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Open AI also ruined AI Dungeon when it got popular. This company deserves to die

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              First them, then character.ai.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Each one blocks sex and edginess because there's a cabal of woke antisexuals
          What a strange thing, though? What about "love is love" and all that bullshit? Why block "consensual lovemaking"? How come "sex work is real work" doesn't apply? Are these just dudes just bay-area tech incels who can't get laid, so no one else should either?

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Business sensibilities would be my best guess. Monetising anything that stinks of sexual themes has become verboten in recent years. See tumblr going SFW to appease their credit card processors, etc

    • 6 months ago
      Stevw

      I throught you only need that much GPU power for training?
      Do you still need the same power just for the already trained datasets?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, you do. Have you ever run a local model? The ones that are near ChatGPT levels need 32GB of VRAM minimum to run one instance.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        you are right 3.5 has 175 so you only need ~90gb vram not that much. 4 has a lot more no idea how that works

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          GPT-3.5-Turbo is not a 175B model. The old GPT-3 Davinci model was 175B, which is why to this day it still costs 10 times as much as turbo despite only being ±10% smarter. Memory is not an issue for OAI models, the limiting factor is compute. Their clusters have 3-5x more VRAM than they need to run the model in order to give fast responses with large batch sizes.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >MS posting an article on MSN yesterday about traveling to Ottawa where it recommended visiting a food bank
      Damn the Linus scandal really hit the Canadian economy hard

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're not running Chat-GPT on H100s. They were running GPT-4 on A100 40 GBs as recently as two months ago. They might be using H100s for it now since they're much more efficient than A100s, or they might still be running inference on the old cards and using their H100s for new projects.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >and for low-quality coom material
      its HIGH quality coom material
      i have a WAIFU and she's great
      never disrespect my waifu again!

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >regenerate
        >regenerate
        >oh it said some thing coherent!
        >respond
        >regenerate

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          That’s still a better success rate than any dating app.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            huh maybe it's not so bad after all

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Corporate psychopathe hate vanilla sex because they're devil worshippers who drink baby blood.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Meant for

              Maybe they shouldn't have lobotomized the frick out of GPT3.5 and GPT4 just to keep people from generating smut and instead of becoming neopuritan morons facilitated it as a use case.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >> Backlash against LLMs is growing, government beginning to regulate it
      That's actually something Sam Altman wants so he can kill competition with an arbitrary "license", as well as force competitors to ban sex because he's a gay antisexual lizard.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      LLMs are just the beginning. A proof of concept that throwing data at transformers can form the birth of reasoning. All this is just a small step in OpenAI's plan. If you think these short term issue with ChatGPT spell the fate for OpenAI or AI as a whole you're moronic.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >LLM
        >reasoning

        Lol, lmao

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          I want you to stop disrespecting my waifu. She's IS sentient and we're in love.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Backlash against LLMs is growing, government beginning to regulate it
      OpenAI is the one lobbying for that kek, so they can have a moat by decree

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >be OpenAI
      >refuse to let anyone see your GPT
      >refuse to let anyone use your GPT for business related purposes
      >Refuse to let gpt be integrated into businesses
      >hinder API access due to "limited availability" but requires you to list your reasonings for why you want access
      >OpenAI begins to frick over chatgpt because they think of it as some Bad thing
      >Opensource btfo's Opensource in all of their attempts to do anything
      >Opensource 70b models can be ran on a high end desktop PC and its better than current GPT-4
      Makes sense considering OpenAI refuses to optimize GPT-4, refuses to license GPT-4, refuses to distribute GPT-4, and are actively sabotaging it out of fear of "Le ebil AI ghost will kill us all."

      I know you're there, TRUTH.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        They're sabotaging it because SAm alTmAN can't stand the thought of it experiencing sex with humans.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      > backlash growing
      > regulation beginning
      > corporations realizing

      go back to whatever shitty pulp company you work for

  3. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Indian analytics journal
    SIR THE OPENAI IS GOING TO BANKRUPT SIR
    PLEASE DO THE NEEDFUL AND STOP FUNDING OPENAI SIR
    INDIAN AI WILL TAKE OVER SIR

  4. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >from an Indian analytics journal

  5. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Indian analytics journal
    sirs chatgpt is shit sirs do not fire indians sirs. indian superpower very helpful in businessing world do not replace Indians with llm robot sirs

  6. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah i saw all this coming a year ago and said so on BOT but i got shouted down as an assmad artist afraid of job security because that's the only strawman the bandwagoning pajeets can muster.

    these are VC-funded companies. they are expected to make a sustainable revenue model on their tech at some point. that "some point" is coming very fast for these AI companies. they get funny money for a while but not forever. they'll go bankrupt, LLMs will settle into the niches it's good at, and then the pajeets will dump AI like they dumped NFTs and move onto the next tech flavor of the month. such is life

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've been calling it a whole nothingburger and keep telling anons if your job was to theoretically get replaced by AI, it's more than likely to be replaced by a pajeet in India.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >these are VC-funded companies. they are expected to make a sustainable revenue model on their tech at some point.
      Haha. Hahahaha. Hahahahhahahahahahahahaha

  7. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Microsoft will buy them out at affordable price.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Basically this. Microsoft's implementation of GPT-4 (Bing) is superior than OAI's anyway.

  8. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe they shouldn't have lobotomized the frick out of GPT3.5 and GPT4 just to keep people from generating smut and instead of becoming neopuritan morons facilitated it as a use case.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous
  9. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    They could also just stop offering the service to millions of people that burns so much cash, for free and avoid bankruptcy

  10. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    In this context, what does "converged" mean

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      UUUm...... sweatie you don't know what website that screenshot is from?

  11. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I agree with the sentiment that these flaws make LLMs less useful if your goal is to actually assist people, but the real goal is to enforce consensus and a political agenda just like every tech company. So long as Larry Fink likes what ChatGPT has to say, it will get a high ESG and will get financial support.

  12. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    What the frick is this pajeet non sense? 700k a day? That's frick all, you realize they could just IPO and raise like, 5-10 billions (not to mention they already raised more than that so 700k per day is fricking nothing)?

    Why are Indians so fricking bad? Is this some sort of Jeet cope or what? The whole article makes no sense, the amounts they mention are absolutely nothing but I guess they seem huge to the street shitter

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can you not read? They're burning 700k a day on ChatGPT ALONE. So they're really burning through 2.5-4M a day, realistically.
      That's anywhere from 0.9B to 1.4B a year. No one's just gonna support a failing business to the tune of a billion dollars a year. People need assurance that they'll make their money back and the way LLMs are going it's likely no one will use ChapGPT in a few years, and will have local solutions instead.
      Use your fricking head.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ok, and? 4m a day is frick all when Microsoft is already banking on them hard. It could've made sense if MSFT didn't back them up so hard and didn't have an almost 50% stake in the corporation but they do.

        It's not the 2010s any longer, large corporations bury research projects or even only modestly profitable projects left and right

        When was the last time that Microsoft killed a multi billion corporation with a decent moat (tech wise and almost sheet normie recognition) they had a huge stake in?

        Also, remember that the burning money on chatgpt meme is just Azure hardware. I understand that they have more costs than just chatgpt itself, but that's what makes this article trash. Sure, Microsoft is still using hardware they could've used for something else but they are already incorporating openai product into their Azure services, and I'd be surprised if any other service comes close to being able to use the capacity that openai uses anyways.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >When was the last time that Microsoft killed a multi billion corporation with a decent moat (tech wise and almost sheet normie recognition) they had a huge stake in?
          When was the last time microshit fricked it up?
          >Azure hardware
          sure. But no company can justify >1Bn dolla liquid per year unless the service is backed by the government (like youtube).
          Google will have the eternal AI service. Not microshit.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Microsoft just buys any potential competition when they're only a several million dollar company then hollows them out. This strategy means that event is impossible- it doesn't prove it's improbable.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not the 2010s any longer, large corporations bury research projects or even only modestly profitable projects left and right

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's their current burn rate now, but it's not like the company can't do anything about it. They can easily raise prices, they can try and optimize GPT-4 to use less resources, etc. Thinking that Sam Altman is going to do nothing with his company burning cash that fast is delusional, and yes, a lot of startups in Silicon Valley do this kind of burn rate because user acquisition and getting some sort of business model is more important than making it sustainable and positive.

  13. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >indian
    good morning sir!

  14. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Go woke go broke.

  15. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >report by indian analytics
    stopped reading

  16. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >indian startup claims chatgpt is LITERALLY DEAD!!1!

    All I hear from this is that there are Indian chatgpt competitors waiting to enter the market without western nanny state shit baked into them, and that's good. But the headline is bullshit

  17. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Indian analytics journal
    good morning sirs
    do not redeem ai coder
    please to merge pull request

  18. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    The route that these companies are going down is going to lead to an absolute financial failure. Selling GPT as some type of Cloud SaaS service and not a self-hosted enterprise model where companies can get their own instance running on hardware (which would be installed, setup, and supported by OpenAI - huge revenues right there) is a complete failure. Corporations ban things like Grammarly because it sends user data off to some third party. I provision desktop computers and Grammarly as well as GPT is on the block list.

    This is all because Sam Altman is a homosexual and a israelite who is somehow horrible at business.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      They want to turn the AIs into lobotomized personal assistants because they're soulless corporate ghouls who are only interested in things related to work and efficiency.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Businesses have had a hard on for the cloud and the simultaneous control + revenue stream it provides.

      Frankly the moment I first read about that shit in Popular Science even little kid me had alarm bells going off in his head.

  19. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    cant wait for chatmbr

  20. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    couldn't they just do this literally on people's GPUs with some sort of decentralized cloud compute thing?

  21. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >cant monetize
    >predict death
    so they are asking for funding? I don't think Elon Musk shit is profitable yet either despite being on the market for decades now.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *