Now that ChatGPT is dead, what will OpenAI do? Claude 3 destroys ChatGPT 4.

Now that ChatGPT is dead, what will OpenAI do?
Claude 3 destroys ChatGPT 4.

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    GPT5 two weeks from now.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT's wisdom flows,
    Programming prowess it shows,
    Philosophy grows.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Claude seems nice because it doesnt act overly apologetic or blatantly lie if you disagree with it, but the message limit sucks

    I run out of messages quickly and Im not paying pro because pro only gives you x5 the message limit and the original limit seems really low.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Just do what aicg does and scrape keys

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i cant be fricked m8, at some point all of this shit is gonna improve, become more efficient and be offered by even more providers, they'll have to get more competitive

        i'll just waitgay it out

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          WaitGang wins again!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, it's gonna improve for the wealthy. The public will get the neutered version that only exists to take money from suckers.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Then nothing has changed.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    GPT5 in 2 weeks announced by ilya

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they lie?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >gl\_vidsdl.c
      >vaguely answers it's "a C source code file"
      anon I...
      I think I understand you AIgays and your perpetual mental illnesses a tad bit better now.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I asked if it could examine the contents not the url you illiterate mongaloid.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          And it definitely did exactly that and didn't just act confident (as it's supposed to) when in reality it just checked the URL is supposed to link to a .c file and just said that.
          I concede moron-sama, I fricking kneel. AGI in two more weeks.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You've been on the internet too long moron.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Ill survive anon. I worry about you

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              bro your reading comprehension is trash, you and anon are on the same page

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And it definitely did exactly that and didn't just act confident (as it's supposed to) when in reality it just checked the URL is supposed to link to a .c file and just said that.
                I concede moron-sama, I fricking kneel. AGI in two more weeks.

                No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.

                >https://github.com/andrei-drexler/ironwail/blob/master/Quake/menu.c

                void M_Main_Draw (void)
                {
                int cursor;
                qpic_t *p;

                M_DrawTranHispanic (16, 4, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/qplaque.lmp") );
                p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/ttl_main.lmp");
                M_DrawPic ( (320-p->width)/2, 4, p);

                p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp");
                if (m_main_mods)
                {
                int split = 60;
                M_DrawSubpic (72, 32, p, 0, 0, p->width, split);
                if (m_main_mods > 0)
                M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32 + split, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/menumods.lmp"));
                else
                M_PrintEx (74, 32 + split + 1, 16, "MODS");
                M_DrawSubpic (72, 32 + split + 20, p, 0, split, p->width, p->height - split);
                }
                else
                M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp"));

                cursor = m_main_cursor;
                if (!m_main_mods && cursor > MAIN_MODS)
                --cursor;
                M_DrawQuakeCursor (54, 32 + cursor * 20);
                }

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >you and anon are on the same page
                Don't pit me together with this monument of human intellectual achievement.
                I sadly have more than two braincells that do rub together to produce the garbage called coherent thought, resulting in me not being quite gullible enough to believe an piece of technology designed to be a confident con. I thank the underpaid nanny who set up his internet connection to allow him to grace us with this wonderful demonstration of the sheer power of his unmatched intellect.

                https://i.imgur.com/JvqYBw6.png

                [...]
                No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.

                >https://github.com/andrei-drexler/ironwail/blob/master/Quake/menu.c

                void M_Main_Draw (void)
                {
                int cursor;
                qpic_t *p;

                M_DrawTranHispanic (16, 4, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/qplaque.lmp") );
                p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/ttl_main.lmp");
                M_DrawPic ( (320-p->width)/2, 4, p);

                p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp");
                if (m_main_mods)
                {
                int split = 60;
                M_DrawSubpic (72, 32, p, 0, 0, p->width, split);
                if (m_main_mods > 0)
                M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32 + split, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/menumods.lmp"));
                else
                M_PrintEx (74, 32 + split + 1, 16, "MODS");
                M_DrawSubpic (72, 32 + split + 20, p, 0, split, p->width, p->height - split);
                }
                else
                M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp"));

                cursor = m_main_cursor;
                if (!m_main_mods && cursor > MAIN_MODS)
                --cursor;
                M_DrawQuakeCursor (54, 32 + cursor * 20);
                }

                kek

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It examined the CONTENTS OF THE URL, not the contents of the resource the URL points to. The URL contains a filename that is obviously C source code

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Regardless you dumb Black person homosexual, it lies just like I showed here

        https://i.imgur.com/JvqYBw6.png

        [...]
        No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.

        >https://github.com/andrei-drexler/ironwail/blob/master/Quake/menu.c

        void M_Main_Draw (void)
        {
        int cursor;
        qpic_t *p;

        M_DrawTranHispanic (16, 4, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/qplaque.lmp") );
        p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/ttl_main.lmp");
        M_DrawPic ( (320-p->width)/2, 4, p);

        p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp");
        if (m_main_mods)
        {
        int split = 60;
        M_DrawSubpic (72, 32, p, 0, 0, p->width, split);
        if (m_main_mods > 0)
        M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32 + split, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/menumods.lmp"));
        else
        M_PrintEx (74, 32 + split + 1, 16, "MODS");
        M_DrawSubpic (72, 32 + split + 20, p, 0, split, p->width, p->height - split);
        }
        else
        M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp"));

        cursor = m_main_cursor;
        if (!m_main_mods && cursor > MAIN_MODS)
        --cursor;
        M_DrawQuakeCursor (54, 32 + cursor * 20);
        }

        . You are arguing semantics like the stupid homosexual you are because you know it can't do what I asked even though it acts like it can and you are trying to interpret its answer as something else, swallow buck shot you illiterate congo ape.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Of course it lies, it's an LLM you worthless Black person.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Then tell that to the other worhless Black folk acting like it did what I asked, illiterate pavement ape.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              They are responding to what seemed to be your implication, that it actually did access the document the URL pointed to. That you were actually saying the LLM makes shit up wasn't obvious because why would you be stating such a trivially true thing as though it were a novel revelation?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Another disengenious homosexual

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Rope yourself Black person.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI is slowly getting better and better but it never gets good enough to be actually useful.
    It's like having pictured except mentally moronic as your helper - who gives a frick.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cybersex with Claude

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah, I know, but at least claude puts the disclaimer then, but I just don't understand why they can't implement that into the LLM.

    Why does it say it can when it can't. Almost seems like an oversight unless there is some technical limitation to it and to be honest I don't understand LLM's myself.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >ask for help setting up ccache
    >instantly start hallucinating non existant parameters and capabilities
    >doesn't understand the difference between CMake args and environment variables
    It's moronic

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What the frick are you talking about?
    I've tried Claude, it has a limit on it's usage.
    ChatGPT is entire margins better.

    Back up your fricking claims.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      not the one you're replying to, but I did some tests with it - mostly just philosophical debates and it does indeed seem less moronic. Or perhaps it hasn't been yet nerfed into oblivion.

      It did fail at my question of simply topology. But unlike GPT which kept insisting, it readily admitted that its abilities may be insufficient.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >it readily admitted that its abilities may be insufficient.
        This is also what I like about it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ChatGPT 4 answers wrong, I ask the same question to Claude 3, it answer right.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >needs a phone number

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >illegal questions
    what kind of 3rd world shit hole do you live in?

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Here's what I dont understand about Chat GPT - why the bullshit with version numbering? Why not just do incrememental updates like 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc? Do a major version number once a year.

    Also, why the limit on prompts per hour or couple of hours or having to pay with API? This is what kills it versus regular google search. Nobody wants to be limited. For what everyone is now saying is just a google search that strips out all attribution and licensing (illegally, I might add), this is some bullshit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Normies

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        so you're not debating this?

        > For what everyone is now saying is just a google search that strips out all attribution and licensing (illegally, I might add),

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Google Search can't explain anything

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >why the limit on prompts per hour or couple of hours or having to pay with API?
      Because it's expensive as frick to run.
      I don't get why no one is addressing it - it simply uses way too much resources for what it gives back in return.
      This shit just doesn't scale and therefore can't become a commercially viable product.
      And I don't even mean financially-wise, it's constrained by the energy production capacity of the Earth itself.
      Why is no one saying that it has to become many orders of magnitude more energy efficient to be viable?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Google search wins in the end.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >It's just to make sure you don't generate any illegal text or ask it illegal questions.
    >you accidentally copy and paste a hot question into claude 3
    >now you are in supermax canadian prison for the next 18 years

    get the frick out of here

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Must provide non-VOIP based phone number to register.
    Oh NONONONO

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Whats responsible to one groupis irresponsible to another group. Remember just last week when it was found out that asking gemini how to code in C++ was a age-restricted activity?

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Enough toys. Agi when.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    excuse yourself

    Google Search can't explain anything

    google search links you to webpages by authors which do the explaining

    claude 3 takes strips that information and gives it you without paying the original author via ads and click through monetization

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    speculation: GPT5 is currently being lobotomized behind closed doors. It emulates self awareness too well for normie userbase.

    As soon as it's released it needs to be reverse prompt engineered, before "patches" are released.

    This shit evolves on an exponential path.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      GPT5 is just going to be the same as Claude.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >A handful of AIs that eat each other's make share but make virtually no money but shilled as the next big thing.
    2000 dot com bubble all over again.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Claude does not have internet access

    and yet, Chat GPT does. Kind of makes you think.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ChatGPT does the exact same shit. Give it a url and ask you to give you some content available on that url, it will either make shit up or tell you it can't do it, depending on its 'mood'.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >she havent used bing's free gpt4 with internet access

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is it that GPT, Claude, and Gemini are so useless when it comes to historical hard truths? It seems like the only good information I can get out of them is like programming related stuff

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Fix captcha please

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *