i cant be fricked m8, at some point all of this shit is gonna improve, become more efficient and be offered by even more providers, they'll have to get more competitive
>gl\_vidsdl.c >vaguely answers it's "a C source code file"
anon I...
I think I understand you AIgays and your perpetual mental illnesses a tad bit better now.
And it definitely did exactly that and didn't just act confident (as it's supposed to) when in reality it just checked the URL is supposed to link to a .c file and just said that.
I concede moron-sama, I fricking kneel. AGI in two more weeks.
bro your reading comprehension is trash, you and anon are on the same page
2 months ago
Anonymous
And it definitely did exactly that and didn't just act confident (as it's supposed to) when in reality it just checked the URL is supposed to link to a .c file and just said that.
I concede moron-sama, I fricking kneel. AGI in two more weeks.
No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.
>you and anon are on the same page
Don't pit me together with this monument of human intellectual achievement.
I sadly have more than two braincells that do rub together to produce the garbage called coherent thought, resulting in me not being quite gullible enough to believe an piece of technology designed to be a confident con. I thank the underpaid nanny who set up his internet connection to allow him to grace us with this wonderful demonstration of the sheer power of his unmatched intellect.
https://i.imgur.com/JvqYBw6.png
[...]
No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.
Regardless you dumb Black person homosexual, it lies just like I showed here
https://i.imgur.com/JvqYBw6.png
[...]
No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.
. You are arguing semantics like the stupid homosexual you are because you know it can't do what I asked even though it acts like it can and you are trying to interpret its answer as something else, swallow buck shot you illiterate congo ape.
They are responding to what seemed to be your implication, that it actually did access the document the URL pointed to. That you were actually saying the LLM makes shit up wasn't obvious because why would you be stating such a trivially true thing as though it were a novel revelation?
AI is slowly getting better and better but it never gets good enough to be actually useful.
It's like having pictured except mentally moronic as your helper - who gives a frick.
Yeah, I know, but at least claude puts the disclaimer then, but I just don't understand why they can't implement that into the LLM.
Why does it say it can when it can't. Almost seems like an oversight unless there is some technical limitation to it and to be honest I don't understand LLM's myself.
>ask for help setting up ccache >instantly start hallucinating non existant parameters and capabilities >doesn't understand the difference between CMake args and environment variables
It's moronic
not the one you're replying to, but I did some tests with it - mostly just philosophical debates and it does indeed seem less moronic. Or perhaps it hasn't been yet nerfed into oblivion.
It did fail at my question of simply topology. But unlike GPT which kept insisting, it readily admitted that its abilities may be insufficient.
Here's what I dont understand about Chat GPT - why the bullshit with version numbering? Why not just do incrememental updates like 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc? Do a major version number once a year.
Also, why the limit on prompts per hour or couple of hours or having to pay with API? This is what kills it versus regular google search. Nobody wants to be limited. For what everyone is now saying is just a google search that strips out all attribution and licensing (illegally, I might add), this is some bullshit.
>why the limit on prompts per hour or couple of hours or having to pay with API?
Because it's expensive as frick to run.
I don't get why no one is addressing it - it simply uses way too much resources for what it gives back in return.
This shit just doesn't scale and therefore can't become a commercially viable product.
And I don't even mean financially-wise, it's constrained by the energy production capacity of the Earth itself.
Why is no one saying that it has to become many orders of magnitude more energy efficient to be viable?
>It's just to make sure you don't generate any illegal text or ask it illegal questions. >you accidentally copy and paste a hot question into claude 3 >now you are in supermax canadian prison for the next 18 years
Whats responsible to one groupis irresponsible to another group. Remember just last week when it was found out that asking gemini how to code in C++ was a age-restricted activity?
ChatGPT does the exact same shit. Give it a url and ask you to give you some content available on that url, it will either make shit up or tell you it can't do it, depending on its 'mood'.
Why is it that GPT, Claude, and Gemini are so useless when it comes to historical hard truths? It seems like the only good information I can get out of them is like programming related stuff
GPT5 two weeks from now.
ChatGPT's wisdom flows,
Programming prowess it shows,
Philosophy grows.
Claude seems nice because it doesnt act overly apologetic or blatantly lie if you disagree with it, but the message limit sucks
I run out of messages quickly and Im not paying pro because pro only gives you x5 the message limit and the original limit seems really low.
Just do what aicg does and scrape keys
i cant be fricked m8, at some point all of this shit is gonna improve, become more efficient and be offered by even more providers, they'll have to get more competitive
i'll just waitgay it out
WaitGang wins again!
Yeah, it's gonna improve for the wealthy. The public will get the neutered version that only exists to take money from suckers.
Then nothing has changed.
GPT5 in 2 weeks announced by ilya
Why do they lie?
>gl\_vidsdl.c
>vaguely answers it's "a C source code file"
anon I...
I think I understand you AIgays and your perpetual mental illnesses a tad bit better now.
I asked if it could examine the contents not the url you illiterate mongaloid.
And it definitely did exactly that and didn't just act confident (as it's supposed to) when in reality it just checked the URL is supposed to link to a .c file and just said that.
I concede moron-sama, I fricking kneel. AGI in two more weeks.
You've been on the internet too long moron.
Ill survive anon. I worry about you
bro your reading comprehension is trash, you and anon are on the same page
No, you're both just disengenious homosexuals that very well know the fricking thing pretends it can see the file but because it phrased it in a way you can spin it like the Black person homosexuals you are.
>https://github.com/andrei-drexler/ironwail/blob/master/Quake/menu.c
void M_Main_Draw (void)
{
int cursor;
qpic_t *p;
M_DrawTranHispanic (16, 4, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/qplaque.lmp") );
p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/ttl_main.lmp");
M_DrawPic ( (320-p->width)/2, 4, p);
p = Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp");
if (m_main_mods)
{
int split = 60;
M_DrawSubpic (72, 32, p, 0, 0, p->width, split);
if (m_main_mods > 0)
M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32 + split, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/menumods.lmp"));
else
M_PrintEx (74, 32 + split + 1, 16, "MODS");
M_DrawSubpic (72, 32 + split + 20, p, 0, split, p->width, p->height - split);
}
else
M_DrawTranHispanic (72, 32, Draw_CachePic ("gfx/mainmenu.lmp"));
cursor = m_main_cursor;
if (!m_main_mods && cursor > MAIN_MODS)
--cursor;
M_DrawQuakeCursor (54, 32 + cursor * 20);
}
>you and anon are on the same page
Don't pit me together with this monument of human intellectual achievement.
I sadly have more than two braincells that do rub together to produce the garbage called coherent thought, resulting in me not being quite gullible enough to believe an piece of technology designed to be a confident con. I thank the underpaid nanny who set up his internet connection to allow him to grace us with this wonderful demonstration of the sheer power of his unmatched intellect.
kek
It examined the CONTENTS OF THE URL, not the contents of the resource the URL points to. The URL contains a filename that is obviously C source code
Regardless you dumb Black person homosexual, it lies just like I showed here
. You are arguing semantics like the stupid homosexual you are because you know it can't do what I asked even though it acts like it can and you are trying to interpret its answer as something else, swallow buck shot you illiterate congo ape.
Of course it lies, it's an LLM you worthless Black person.
Then tell that to the other worhless Black folk acting like it did what I asked, illiterate pavement ape.
They are responding to what seemed to be your implication, that it actually did access the document the URL pointed to. That you were actually saying the LLM makes shit up wasn't obvious because why would you be stating such a trivially true thing as though it were a novel revelation?
>Another disengenious homosexual
Rope yourself Black person.
AI is slowly getting better and better but it never gets good enough to be actually useful.
It's like having pictured except mentally moronic as your helper - who gives a frick.
Cybersex with Claude
Yeah, I know, but at least claude puts the disclaimer then, but I just don't understand why they can't implement that into the LLM.
Why does it say it can when it can't. Almost seems like an oversight unless there is some technical limitation to it and to be honest I don't understand LLM's myself.
>ask for help setting up ccache
>instantly start hallucinating non existant parameters and capabilities
>doesn't understand the difference between CMake args and environment variables
It's moronic
What the frick are you talking about?
I've tried Claude, it has a limit on it's usage.
ChatGPT is entire margins better.
Back up your fricking claims.
not the one you're replying to, but I did some tests with it - mostly just philosophical debates and it does indeed seem less moronic. Or perhaps it hasn't been yet nerfed into oblivion.
It did fail at my question of simply topology. But unlike GPT which kept insisting, it readily admitted that its abilities may be insufficient.
>it readily admitted that its abilities may be insufficient.
This is also what I like about it.
ChatGPT 4 answers wrong, I ask the same question to Claude 3, it answer right.
>needs a phone number
>illegal questions
what kind of 3rd world shit hole do you live in?
Here's what I dont understand about Chat GPT - why the bullshit with version numbering? Why not just do incrememental updates like 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc? Do a major version number once a year.
Also, why the limit on prompts per hour or couple of hours or having to pay with API? This is what kills it versus regular google search. Nobody wants to be limited. For what everyone is now saying is just a google search that strips out all attribution and licensing (illegally, I might add), this is some bullshit.
Normies
so you're not debating this?
> For what everyone is now saying is just a google search that strips out all attribution and licensing (illegally, I might add),
Google Search can't explain anything
>why the limit on prompts per hour or couple of hours or having to pay with API?
Because it's expensive as frick to run.
I don't get why no one is addressing it - it simply uses way too much resources for what it gives back in return.
This shit just doesn't scale and therefore can't become a commercially viable product.
And I don't even mean financially-wise, it's constrained by the energy production capacity of the Earth itself.
Why is no one saying that it has to become many orders of magnitude more energy efficient to be viable?
Google search wins in the end.
>It's just to make sure you don't generate any illegal text or ask it illegal questions.
>you accidentally copy and paste a hot question into claude 3
>now you are in supermax canadian prison for the next 18 years
get the frick out of here
>Must provide non-VOIP based phone number to register.
Oh NONONONO
Whats responsible to one groupis irresponsible to another group. Remember just last week when it was found out that asking gemini how to code in C++ was a age-restricted activity?
Enough toys. Agi when.
excuse yourself
google search links you to webpages by authors which do the explaining
claude 3 takes strips that information and gives it you without paying the original author via ads and click through monetization
speculation: GPT5 is currently being lobotomized behind closed doors. It emulates self awareness too well for normie userbase.
As soon as it's released it needs to be reverse prompt engineered, before "patches" are released.
This shit evolves on an exponential path.
GPT5 is just going to be the same as Claude.
>A handful of AIs that eat each other's make share but make virtually no money but shilled as the next big thing.
2000 dot com bubble all over again.
>Claude does not have internet access
and yet, Chat GPT does. Kind of makes you think.
ChatGPT does the exact same shit. Give it a url and ask you to give you some content available on that url, it will either make shit up or tell you it can't do it, depending on its 'mood'.
>she havent used bing's free gpt4 with internet access
Why is it that GPT, Claude, and Gemini are so useless when it comes to historical hard truths? It seems like the only good information I can get out of them is like programming related stuff
Fix captcha please