What are the political implications of this?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
MAN ARRESTED FOR MAKING ILLEGAL AI PORN
What are the political implications of this?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
I dont know how to feel about this. Its definitely still pedophilia but its also a victimless crime when its ai made. Sounds like its definitely morrally wrong but idk if it should be illegal
Well I guess thay confirms that protecting children is not the point. FBI wont have anything to pin on political opponents anymore.
>morrally wrong
Frick off Thought Police. Do you cry over Skyrim bandits?
Source on that image?
It's not morally wrong to kill bandits. In skyrim it is impossible to kill the children so your little objection was already thought through. Fricking moron
>Its definitely still pedophilia
are there actually any laws anywhere that specifically make pedophilia a crime?
Big brain take:
With the current laws and how pedophilia is perceived by society, it shouldn't be illegal and should even be praised as pedophiles using AI are finding alternatives instead of hurting kids.
However, we should shift our perspective and hang pedophiles, even if they aren't rapists or watch actual CP.
>how pedophilia is perceived by society, it shouldn't be illegal
>should shift our perspective and hang pedophiles, even if they aren't rapists or watch actual CP
huh? ones that dont offend should be praised but ones that dont offend should be killed?
No, It's in fact already protected from some bill that prevents being judged on your sexual orientation
The law of attraction
yes
archive.
ph/e2S81
Washington post article about it from a few weeks ago. Basically the AI needs real CP to learn how to make AI CP. Fricking gross
So arrest the AI?
Dude, it's fricking gross.
He should be locked away for life for being icky and ew.
don't call him gross
How? Ai isn't smart enough to just make smaller human body's with a child face attached? I'm not condoning this shit but i doubt this is true
I have a lot more experience with advanced use of AI than your average person here, and these AI picture generators are overhyped for what they are. Such technology already existed for a long time, it just wasn't as good. The AI doesn't actually make a picture, it just mashes up a series of pictures from the data set in a random way then cleans it up a little bit and the resulting picture sometimes looks alright. Good pictures from AI require hundreds of attempts and it's basically random chance.
ChatGPT is similar. It is moronic and will give the most generic mashed up response to anything. It's actually extremely useful if you are a corporate guy answering emails or a programmer, but that's really more a reflection on how brainless being a wagie or a code monkey is. Even before GPT the main job of every programmer was looking up the answers on Google.
>The AI doesn't actually make a picture, it just mashes up a series of pictures from the data set in a random way then cleans it up a little bit and the resulting picture sometimes looks alright.
Thats not how it works at all. https://www.paepper.com/blog/posts/everything-you-need-to-know-about-stable-diffusion/
Educate yourself
Bro, you don't know how it works at all. lmao
kek, holy shit, dunning kruger effect in action right here folks.
Just skimmed the article.
>Needs real CP to learn how to make CP
Doesn't say that at all.
Fundamental misunderstanding of ML diffusion models
>Basically the AI needs real CP to learn how to make AI CP.
Not at all. Just feed it e-girl hentai, then also feed it real women. Then tell it to combine the two.
How do other models make things like dragons? Where are the real dragons at?
>he doesn't know about the dragons
newbie
incorrect, fricking boomers
i think using ai in this manner is gross and weird but some would say my use of it to render impossible creatures and sexual situations involving hitler to be the same, but i'm not digging up and descrating hitler's skull or anything...
this is thought crime and first amendment territory if no minors are involved
even if this was the case (it's not like that), why they don't persecute, openai, stability ai and the laion database, but go for a random dude that used their tool?
For some reason, I doubt that's the case. I don't know what real cp looks like. But I imagine it isn't too different from regular porn, just with smaller people.
This. He had to have used real images to train the ai.
not true. SD can create some crazy shit without literal inputs.
literally mentally moronic
these are the type of people you argue with on /misc/, so dumb they look like they glow
That's fricking moronic. What real images did I use for this?
Not neccessary I think. Petite women and midget porn already exists.
Each word in the prompt is processed individually. And the relationship in between is determined by adverbs.
The ai is trained separately on what a child. And what porn is.
Even if mentioning the two in the same sentence will get you automatic reactions by most people, logically, the distinction in Ai processing is evident. The AI does not need training in a specific compound image to create it from two previously trained concepts.
In a similar exercise. It doesnt need to know how exactly a pine forest looks to draw it if its been trained on what trees, and forests are.
In short, the whole AI deal is beyond mainstream human understanding. And this is just one of the more taboo reasons for it.
no law was broken you homosexual. pedos get the rope but to take the states side on this is moronic NPC tier. jackboot thugs literally arrested and charged someone for laws that dont even exist in order to establish precedent.
you think its a stretch that they will now arrest you for having a picture of a machinegun on your computer?
It can't be that bad
>arrest you for having a picture of a machinegun on your computer
CAD files have been used for constructive intent before. Dont quote me but the files could be illegal in New York. Hell they tried to make 100% receivers and the tooling a crime in California. See Ghost Gunner.
>tyrannical israelites out of control and trying to ban all opposing political information
this doesnt surprise me in the least
Looks like I am currently wrong. Glad to hear.
https://reason.com/2021/04/28/gunmaking-cad-files-free-to-spread-around-the-internet-9th-circuit-rules/
you were right, they arrested some guy for printing pictures
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2021/03/30/autokeycard-seized-arrested/
The moment glowBlack folk decide to crack down on innocent people over possessing gun schematics every 3d printer in the world is going into maximum overdrive and print guns in a scale their israelite overlords are incapable of surmounting in their most complex supercomputers.
Two more weeks.
Any CP, including e-girl anime, falls under obscenity laws which can get you jail time. And possession of e-girl anime have been used to charge people for possession of CP, although in those cases it was in addition to people who owned real CP. Either way, there's plenty of precedence for this
>Although in those cases it was in addition to people who owned real CP
Exactly.
But that alone is precedence for the courts to charge you with e-girl and AI CP alone under obscenity laws. in one case drawings and stories were used against a child abuser who was in jail who started drawing and writing it
>In the fourth case, a federal prisoner (already serving a sentence for possession of actual child pornography) was charged with possessing a "coloring book" or "comic book" containing inmate-created drawings of what appeared to be "a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." During a 2014 search, Danny Borgos, an inmate at FCI Seagoville, was found "with a paginated series of drawings, consisting of 37 pages in a comic or coloring book-style format, depicting obscene representations of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct."While the lack of any connection to real persons was undisputed, the indictment described the fictional drawings as showing "three girls between the ages of 6 and 11 'engaging in sexually explicit conduct'."
>Borgos, who pled guilty on the advice of counsel and was sentenced to a consecutive 10-year term of imprisonment, attempted to challenge the judgment in 2017 with a post-conviction petition.[158] Borgos argued that the drawn pictures should be "considered art, not obscene." However, referencing the factual basis for his guilty plea,[159] the reviewing judge observed that Borgos had "confessed that these visual depictions ...[comprised] a 'bunch of drawings of children having sexual intercourse and an adult male sexually assaulting three little girls'," implicating the definition of child pornography established by the United States Congress in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A). Because Borgos had admitted to the obscene nature of the fictional images, his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) and (d)(5) for "Possession of Obscene Visual Representations of the Sexual Abuse of Children" was not vulnerable to collateral attack.
They can, and eventually will use it
>obscenity laws are heckin valid for drawings but not for naked homosexuals having dildo orgy parades for pride month
Fricking grim. Another w for the land of the free.
Definitely confirms they don't give a frick about actually protecting children, it's just more convictions and revenue for the state.
Not really surprising, considering most of our politicians are pedophiles.
There's guys who get arrested for having e-girl hentai and one dude who got arrested for ordering a "child sex doll". People who touch and rape kids or who have images of real naked children deserve the rope to be sure but arresting people for having drawings and dolls is absurd.
Imagine policing people for imaging sick shit in their minds. To me, AI policing is tantamount to thoughtpolicing. He didn't ask the AI to make a virus or a bomb.
Do that shit in an absolute shithole where the agencies dont care
Like India?
It's all about controlling the goyim's use of software and AI, the israelites obviously don't give a frick about kids.
Well unless they're literally fricking them.
I think if nobody gets harmed, who gives a frick? If it prevents some c**t from diddling an actual kid, then that's a plus. I had this conversation when some rando was arrested here for buying a "child-like" sex doll and I just don't see the point in arresting anyone for anything if nobody is harmed and there are no victims. It seems like a waste of tax payer resources to me.
I don't know how to feel either. I could probably fap to it but it would feel kind of empty without hurting any kids
scum imbecile.
Please have a nice day tonight.
Based on literally all the evidence, e-girlcon correlates, basically universally, with DECREASED child sexual abuse. 1 child per 100,000 gets diddled in Japan. In the UK, its around 15 in every 100,000. In Australia where certain manga are banned and women with small breasts were restricted from porn, it's 27 per 100,000.
Basically, banning this ensures MORE kids get fricked. Banning it is literally the pro-pedo option.
PLEASE THINK OF THE DRAWINGS
It should not be illegal because the victims are fake and it definitely in this case prevents harm of REAL victims.
Legalizing this could put the entire REAL CP business out of business.
Did legalizing marijuana put fentanyl cartels out of business?
Do you think fentanyl is the same as marijuana?
neither is anime reality
But anime resulted in japanese men ignoring 3DPD femoids, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.
The guy is short circuiting from realizing that Japan is nothing like the harem animes he binged before going to live there.
It will be for me. I'm handsome and will use Jap girls to make White girls jealous and vice versa. I deserve it for all the shit I've gone through.
You don't deserve anything ... Only what you've earned.
And I'll earn my trip there with epic coding and drawing skills
Because fate has chosen me
>Fent
>Marijuana
Ok moron
Victimless crimes should be forbidden. Justice for who?
It's thoughtcrime.
frick you kys homosexual grooming troon
Idfk about Canada, but in USA the courts ruled that underage hentai is legal because it's not a real person and therefore has no age of consent.
I'm sure AI porn is also covered.
England just joined a 20 year old for Simpsons vp, Bart and Marge, iirc he got 2 years.
Fricking kek
He didn't fight it tho he pled guilty
Makes more work for FBI investigators
The girls being trafficked are already "not real" because they don't have a social security number
AI cannot make without actual images. So the question is the source of the images used by the AI.
>So the question is the source of the images used by the AI
there's nothing unusual in the training data those non-profits fed to their models, stop asking funny questions, goy
i must be getting sloppy, brb treating my case of the gay
Strange, it has no problems making dragons, dinosaurs, and images of long dead people. How are these people conjuring these fantasy creatures and corpses of long dead historical figures, and restoring them to a living condition no less!
AI doesn't need actual CP to make fake CP, moron. It just combines child + nude body, and the internet is loaded with porn.
>like a third world radically religious dictatorship we arrest people for making cartoons
>I dont know how to feel about this. Its definitely still pedophilia but its also a victimless crime when its ai made.
No. AI is made from large collections of source images. You require a backlog of crimes with victims to create this stuff.
Don't even once think that its 'Victimless" when you need tens of thousands of victims just to get it going.
Not really. AI could probably use fake composites made to make fake pictures. It does confuse the police so there is that.
>Not really. AI could probably use fake composites made to make fake pictures.
...and what are those composites made from, anon?
How about a fricking drawing?
No thanks.
I haven't read the replies yet but one of my first thoughts is "does this stuff legitimately help to prevent pedos from committing physical attacks and seeking out actual real cp?" Has this ever been studied? Does it encourage these urges leading to real shit? If e-girl AI/artwork does actually prevent children from being attacked and the pursuit of real cp is there an obligation to legalize it, or should it be illegal regardless?
Justifying pedophilia?
Off to jail with you!
Just arrest everyone.
The only logical post in this thread and it gets booed
>No chud, you can only draw fat old roasties with cellulite
look at /misc/ suddenly feel anxious XDDDDDD
it will create competitive CP -t.moronic french
>conspiracy to make fake CP
lel
It’s rightfully illegally. It’s counterfeit porn! You’re going to devalue my investment in human trafficking with this artificial BS. You make CP easier to get and it doesn’t hold proper value. These children are literally putting their backs into it and working it until their hands bleed. Blood sweat and tears is the foundation of any good pornography. Don’t allow some AI generator to hyper inflate the market.
>It’s rightfully illegally. It’s counterfeit porn! You’re going to devalue my investment in human trafficking with this artificial BS. You make CP easier to get and it doesn’t hold proper value. These children are literally putting their backs into it and working it until their hands bleed. Blood sweat and tears is the foundation of any good pornography. Don’t allow some AI generator to hyper inflate the market.
CIA getting rid of competition?
LAND OF THE FREE
this is so fricking funny. this is what society has become, fricking clownworld where victimless crimes get you arrested and Black folk run free
>by that logic, if ai cuny is illegal, how the frick is e-girl ~~*art*~~ legal?
This guy probably lives somewhere where e-girl is illegal.
wait... what? is there such a thing? i mean in the west, i know sandBlack folk ban everything except childrape
Yeah, Massachusetts for one.
I don't remember which western country it was but they explicitly banned writing erotica about minors and it was treated like cp. In romania they just say "sexually explicit materials" involving a real person or simulating a minor, so they could put you in prison for e-girl or books if they wanted to
literally almost everyhwere in america
Googled Skaraborg, it's in Sweden. That's pretty funny: arrest a dude making AI porn, meanwhile there are gangs of sandBlack folk raping actual children.
In Poland the law from the 90s is written in such a way that distributing e-girl is illegal.
Is it legal in the US? It seems rather conflicted.
If you're caught in some honeytrap and have 1 real image and 99 e-girl images, they will count it as 100 real images. That's about it. On it's own nobody will care.
Its pretty scary that they definitely plant that shit on peoples computers with exif data and stuff. Even being accused of possessing stuff like that wilill ruin your entire life
Even being accused of possessing something like that will ruin your entire life
I don't give a frick what people think
It's the only thing they can arrest white people for.
e-girl is illegal in the UK. Remember that when you see a bong anon posting dicky. You could get him sent to prison for half a decade if you just get his IP and send it to the bong police.
OOOI YE GOT YER OSS LOICENSE MEIGHT?
e-girl isn't legal in common wealth countries. Which is moronic because it's a fricking drawing.
Meanwhile their politicians are trolling around orphanages and raping children (true story btw).
its not legal
e-girl is no longer legal in USA as of 3-5 years ago. Look at wikipedia.
Since when? The Supreme Court said it was so unless the Supreme Court reverted anything it is legal federally.
California has it's own regulations regarding hentai stuff.
Jews
anon, most of the world has it as illegal, we have it as illegal too, but applies only to 3d or pretty realistic stuff, the dude in OP would have ended in prison here too, if they decided to persecute for this bs, you need to escape is switzerland or albania to be free
Holy Based. We red.
But who needs Loki when you got Scandi funny.
>how the frick is e-girl ~~*art*~~ legal?
It's not. That man got sentenced for attempting to draw a picture.
only israelites are allowed to frick kids and own cp
e-girl art is actually illegal in many countries
explicitly illegal in Australia, and tentatively illegal in the US
They generally won't go after you if you're not distributing it, in the US, but it could be used to bolster other charges.
One of my old work supervisors went to prison over it, because he apparently DID distribute a video involving 2 REAL teenagers on an internet forum.
That was the only REAL life CP he had on his system.
However, he had a frickton of e-girl art, and he had to make a plea deal, because the DA was literally going to separate out each of his individual charges for each image. The DA counted all e-girl art, basically, and if he didn't take the plea deal he was going to receive 1200 charges, aka, one for every single file.
He was immediately given a VERY Saul Goodman stern recommendation by his lawyer. It was something like this:
"If you don't take this plea deal, with all due respect, you are the most fricking moronic person on the planet. Any jury in the entire history of law would literally eat you alive."
The prison time didn't really affect him. His wife immediately divorcing him, fricked him up far worse than the prison time.
It was like a "Derek Chauvin's wife" situation.
Here, found the news article:
https://www.wral.com/story/knightdale-man-faces-child-pornography-charges/18332001/
So those 11 charges, were for 11 different instances where he posted on the online forum. This news article came out before the investigation found all of his e-girl art and stuff on his computer.
So, they started off with what they had evidence for, before they even arrested him.
After the investigation found the additional images on his hard drive, that 11 ballooned up to over 1200.
He made the plea deal, somewhat quickly, and the news never even knew about the massive amount of charges that were used to obtain his plea.
All news has been written by AI since 2010. We're just telling you now because we have perfected it
>t.microsoft
>All news has been written by AI since 2010
the hole goes much deeper
CP enthusiasts of /misc/ are seething
This is thought crime. Why not just say it's a 40 year old woman with a growth disorder?
ah yes the BOT approach
> its not CP, she’s really a 500 year old demon!!! With G cups XD
>guys probably uses actual child porn to make AI images
>how can I, the disingenuous journalist make clickbait
>I know!
>another ignorant Black person /misc/tard that doesn't know shit what he's talking about
As usual.
OH MY GOD
YOU MADE A
FAKE
IMAGE?
ITS NOT EVEN OF A REAL PERSON?
YOU FRICKING SICKO
HOW DARE YOU
THAT WOMAN NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 40 YEARS OLD, FAT AND LOOK LIKE SHE SMOKES
THE PRETEND VICTIMS OF YOUR CRIMES WILL HAVE PERMANANT SCARS FOR THE REST OF THEIR UNWILLINGLY IMAGINED LIVES
THESE HYPOTHETICAL PEOPLE ARE NOW GOING TO HAVE THERAPY! AND ONE IS GOING TO HAVE AN IMAGINARY ABORTION AFTER YOU GENERATED HER PREGNANT
YOUR GOING TO HORNY JAIL
YOU KNOW WHAT THEY DO TO e-girl CONS IN HORNY JAIL?
look its a real giraffe.
How can you afford to feed an entire giraffe?
ez
Guys look at my totally real girlfriend, she is 150 years old elf and she is very sexy. You can tell she is a real person because I have a picture of her. Its like some kind of witch craft where I have stolen her soul by just imagining she could exist from this generated image.
Here is a real picture of me
your girlfriend is so hot.
>150 year old elf
>these golden ear points come right off
Anon... I think you've been had.
>elf
>round ears
THAT'S whats wrong with her face - she look like a man.
wow, one arm per 50 years of age
I see you’ve figured out how to age the round-eared elf. Wait ‘til you figure out how to sex one.
she looks 8 years old you pedophile i'm going to arrest you
Is that real?
>elf
you can't just slap ear extensions on random bawd and play santa's shelper with her, anon.
gay homosexual mexican detected.
how did you make her do that? wow! is this real? can i share it with my friends? may i save this image friend?
Your wife has very nice skin
Is nobody going to comment on the extra arms or was I the only one gay enough to notice?
Somebody should walk into court with a ai photo of a gold bar and try to bribe the judge.
Man... and not even making use of the entire neck. We have a blue-ribbon winner in the BJ dept.
I taught it not to go down to far.
Last time it almost choked when I came.
id let him eat the trees in my yard i could help feed him
>he is a criminal because he rendered realistic child
>he is not criminal because the image was borked
What
dicky is reserved for the elite of society, they will happily try to railroad the everyman who wants to partake
Wtf dude
50 years ago you could buy child porn at the news stand in the airport.
the 70s were on another level. i remember reading about some old french fart who got an award for writing about how he fricked little boys.
You cowards should have started the war back then, rather than let it get to the way things are now.
Black person
>Muh ethics in AI
Meanwhile all these israelites believe in three years and a day.
>brown hands
Pottery
Give CuNi 9
All pedos should be given a chance for a proper confession with a Catholic priest and executed for the good of society.
>All pedos should be given a chance for a proper confession with a experienced pedo priest
Nah, real priests not the very few homosexuals who infiltrated the Church.
>Skaraborg
SWEDEN YES
Think of the 3 legged children
It happened in Sweden and its literally a thought crime. We had a similar case back in 2010 when somebody got caught having anime e-girl porn but he was freed because they are drawings.
Not to mention is sets dangerous precedents.
>We think you meant this so you are now guilty
>You attacked people in video games so you are now charged with attempt to murder
>You read a book that had tax evasion in it and might be dangerous
Minority report shit.
Ok pedo
morons like you are why they use pedophilia to set the precedent. Not that it matters in your case. The UK is about two weeks away at any given moment from unilaterally declaring it illegal to be white.
It's like when in America they vouch for gun control and say stuff like "You murder children". Just manipulative illogical bullshit.
in the UK they already made it a thoughtcrime to eye rape a woman. if you look at a woman and she doesnt like it, its sexual assault and illegal.
no wonder so many bongs here are cheering for this law.
Not like there's any whites in UK, kek.
Take a look at your arm. Look back up at my reply. Remember what you are
You live in the UK. You can't accuse others of pedophilia
Again, you live in a nation full of Pakistani nonces. You don't really fricking care because you have done frick all nothing to stop them, instead you come here limp dicked and seething you can't control the thoughts and behaviors of everyone on earth like the autistic Black person sperg you are.
only other guy who gets it in this thread. scary how many morons are posting in here to arrest someone for thoughtcrime
>scary how many morons are posting in here to arrest someone for thoughtcrime
They are israelites or spiritual israelites/zogbots.
PROTIP: Laws are not justice. The law has never been based in justice. In the USA particularly it's a massive kosher financial racket, you "need" a israelite lawyer to do anything of any consequence in this country. In other countries it's used to enforce the sort of cattle mindset you describe. There's only one form of "justice" in this world and it comes out of the barrel of a gun. Feds and cops WILL get angry at me for posting this, even when they know it's true.
Yep, it''s pre-crime shit.
If no actual child was harmed you are starting to arrest people for something they might do.
That goes beyond just pedo policing. Look up anything about guns? You need to be arrested because you might shoot someone.
Hey dumbass
If you write down plans to rob a bank and draw a map of the bank with positions and all
its conspiracy
This is no different
Conspiracies aren't real, bigot
increasing confusion of ugly and educated people
How’d they catch him? Was he not running SD locally? Did he try to upload his gens somewhere?
Half a chance they cooked it up to help the upcoming AI regulation bills pass.
But, that’s dishonest!
Europe doesn't have freedom of speech, so...
i hate sweden
In some years people are gonna be able to make very específic porn. Technology is not gonna wait for morality to catch up. As a society we are completely frick. In the future people are gonna choose to be slaves to artificial realities that will cuddle all are desires.
Already are.... No one wants to take the first step when things are good.
I would never upload my brain to a computer when the heebs still have so much control. Will the matrix run windows? All those prompts shoving garbage pajeet coded software down your throat must feel like legit fire and brimstone if your brain is in there.
>In the future people are gonna choose to be slaves to artificial realities that will cuddle all are desires.
We're already there. I'm sorry.
>In the future people are gonna choose to be slaves to artificial realities that will cuddle all are desires.
we already are, it's just that the tech is not there yet, when we can live in a virtual reality you will see how many people will go for it, because their real reality is fricking hell, and no government is doing something about it, and other people are unlikeable, an isekai harem in a virtual world is clearly superior
Let's further legitimize thought crimes so the government can throw you into prison for life because they felt like it.
Combine this insanity with more and more women being in the handle of power, and they'll be imprisoning men for whatever the frick emotional damage based crimes at the drop of a hat.
I always find it insane how everyone is totally fine with fictitious murder of adults and considers it normal, but chimps the frick out as some moral police if children are involved in any way.
If art porn is considered real then that has to apply to murder too.
browntards will be protected from this law. so this will be targeted towards white males
Naturally, it's all to control the masses of whites and make them afraid to even talk about dissenting ideas.
This is going to work very well with anyone who has a "smart" home when they get the official permission to listen to people.
Like that one guy few weeks ago who got his entire smart home locked because Amazon considered something he said was racist.
And remember how year or two ago Apple was pushing for a law that would allow them to scan everyone's phones for pedo content?
Of course no one would disagree with that premise, scan away. You have nothing to hide right?
None of these dumbfricks defending thought crime arrests thinks that this is going to be extended into wrong think the fricking moment they can get away with it.
>We scanned your phone and you have saved a file the AI has deemed unfit.
>File in question showed a large nosed man rubbing his hands
>Get ready to explain yourself in court.
NWO LETSSSSSS GOOOOOOO!!!
>Throw you in prison
Not me
Never me
NOT FOR YOU GOYIM
>What are the political implications of this?
three legged porn is cursed.
Brb, gonna generate a baby Muhammad getting ass fricked by a feral Black person on top of dead baby israelites.
Suck a dick, England.
I just want pedos to die, simple as
Only a matter of time before they 'censor' cemeteries.
Who
is
>They
ai cp bad?
uh oh
tell them now to come here
sshhhhh
In Australia all sexual depictions of minors are illegal.
This causes us enormous problems because
A. It makes using websites based outside of Australia risky because we can't avoid content that's legal for everyone but us
B. It has a major chilling effect in the arts world, where some artists are publishing naked photography of children while others are being arrested for drawings.
Some real women have been arrested for posting nudes or making porn because judges have found proving their are 18 is not a defence of they APPEAR under 18.
C. It threatens the legitimacy of our courts because it's a crime without an empirical standard of proof. It's cultural policing.
The end result is as usual more mass surveillance, state tyranny and minorities nobody ellected seizing power
There was an aussie porn bawd who was accused of making cp because her breasts were too small lmao
>appear under 18
Well this appears to be a drawing of a fictional character, neither of which have ages
>noooo that character has an age and you can't do that!!!
based otaku judge protecting his waifu
For me? It's just not caring what the israelites in the court say
>Some real women have been arrested for posting nudes or making porn because judges have found proving their are 18 is not a defence of they APPEAR under 18.
>generating porn
>Type in micro bikini
>Not small enough
>Type in "small" microbikini
>All of a sudden it's generating Loki's in tiny microbikini
Everyone who has used AI has almost certainly inadvertently made something illegal because of weird word associations like this.
dicky FOR ME AND NOT FOR THEE, GOYIM
first it was "this is illegal cause it harms children".
now its "this is illegal because its illegal and bad".
oh but kids watching adult porn, THAT'S okay. I've yet to see a single white middleclass or above parent go to prison for letting their kids access adult material
>it's illegal to have AI child porn because the AI was trained on real child porn
Windows 11 was trained on real child porn too. As was Google Chrome
its not even true i think
stable diffusion scrapes the clear web and i think the % of cp images its trained will be minuscule
This is not a unique verdict. Sweden has laws against even fictional child pornography.
Why they're not banning all the other fictional depictions that could allegedly lead to crimes is a mystery. Make all images, music and movies and video games containing depictions of rape, murder, manipulation, tax evasion and other crimes illegal.
Humans aren't born with clothing
Humans brains are actually getting messed up from not seeing people naked
It's just a victimless thought-crime even with the real deal
individual freedom over collectivism without exception
the only people that should be held accountable are real child traffickers preventing peoples freedom
and seeing all child trafficking is at least controlled by government
we the people should be the ones enforcing this not the culprits being government
I've been trying to tell people they're going to start this type of attack. They're going to say that possession of any AI sufficiently advanced to create child porn is possession of child porn.
Why kids? Why is anyone fapping to kids in the first place? Put the legal bit aside and answer that first.
sirs.. this is illegal. many years prison time..
lol if it were illegal you wouldnt have dozens of these threads a day on /b/ free posting cp
it might not be illegal in brazil but here its illegal..
How was he caught?
Cloud computing probably, you upload the source images or point to them and give instructions. This is why cloud computing is just a spy, it serves no actual purpose.
>degen threads on /b/ are full of low key CP in the open
so you thought you'd post some here?
yes because everyone is flipping their shit about OP's post completely oblivious to the fact AI cp is posted daily on /b/
>yes because everyone is flipping their shit about OP's post completely oblivious to the fact AI cp is posted daily on /b/
um...ok
Shut the frick up, don't tell them about it you dumb Black person
/b/'s been making hentai like that for ages. People keep complaining, but the anons over there keep posting it. If you got a way to get rid of it, have at them Captain Favela.
do we even have any info on whether digital CP lowers the risk of a pedophile actually raping a little kid
or do the pixels get them uppity and start seeking dicky outside?
desu, I don't think most reasonable people care anymore. They just want kids to be left alone. Even if they blatantly look like videogame characters.
>do we even have any info on whether digital CP lowers the risk of a pedophile actually raping a little kid
Japan had studies made on the topic when they made real CP illegal a few years ago but left the fictional stuff alone. Basically because their rape statistics are low despite immoral fiction was available, they deduced that its not really a problem.
Obviously a violent of free speech, but this is in Sweden, so I don't care.
e-girl is legal in my state. I am unironically asking: do you have an uncensored version?
Yes, I’m a pedo coomer. Just give me the fricking goods.
It was never about abuse, the israelites outlawed dicky in order to accelerate White genocide and punish men who appreciate beauty. They're literally trying to make thought a crime.
Do you lads just make up the law as you go along?
good, no deep fakes in my community
thank you FBI for keeping the content original
>be the us
>give stable diffusion to public
>proliferating degeneracy
>coomers make an ocean
>the sum total of mankind's sin
>river of bright color autism jpgs
b tb
>Looking at the sum total makes you autistic
I wish /b/ wasn't held up by e-girl threads.
Here's to not having my filters on mobile, I remember when people had fun here and it was shit then and it was shit before that.
i think that stuff is stupid. it's literally not real. it's literally just pixels.
I call bullshit! NO VICTIM, NO CRIME! I can show you multiple child related art in houses lof elites along with sculptures yet it's not illegal
the pedo anons on tv are posting realistic CP on top of the actual CP they already post. what I don't get is how is this even possible don't these sites have built in programs not to make underage girls nude.
Yes the program has an advanced algorithm that can tell a 17 years old from an 18 year old. silly question
you can install them locally unlike chatgpt
wtf when did this even start only AI sites I know about are all connected into the net. if that's the case there is no way to stop this there are probably already 10s of millions of AI CP images already then
Yeah you're way behind the times m8, this shit has been local for months now.
Did this moron do it in a country were it is illegal to draw fantasy child porn?
thank you FBI, keeping our communities safe
Kill all pedos. Real cp consooming pedos, e-girl consooming pedos, AI consooming pedos. Total pedo death
THEY'RE TRYING TO CONTROL THE INTERNET WHICH IS DIGITAL WHICH CAN ONLY BE USED FOR COMMUNICATING IDIOT.
Also a fiat dollar, aka fed note, are digital. The numbers on them are digits. The numbers on an American dollar bill are dollars. there is a difference between a digit and a dollar.
1 can be more than 5 in digital. but since 1 and 5 in dollars represents different values of something tangible, it means you get more with the 5 over the 1.
>THEY'RE TRYING TO CONTROL THE INTERNET WHICH IS DIGITAL WHICH CAN ONLY BE USED FOR COMMUNICATING IDIOT.
you are two fricking decades too late man
shut the frick up homosexual. kys if you have nothing to offer
since digital can only be used to communicate with and their nwo is just a pipe dream, it means they are destroying MUSIC. which you probably don't understand a godamn thing about.
example
>durhur Wiki is a consensus of the people so anything therefore on wiki is the consensus of the people.
and then they tell them
>anyone can edit Wiki
they then believe it and swallow it all not KNOWING that a website like that can't exist it is and would will be moronic. There isn't a functioning website like that. But they take whats on wiki like the ADL Frank guy's innocence they spew on it now as if tho its really an actual consensus.
And there is somwhere they are building somewhere where its stupid and irrational they build a consensus for all of the dumb shit that they do. Now its just totally fabricated and they just do it cause its there, use it for consensus. they dont even have to crack shit now they just spew it on their fake servers. noone really thinks this shit being put out. noone would care about wiki but it pretends to have an audience. therefore people watch it
Mr.FBI, share all the CP you have stored over the years.
QUICK, HIDE YOUR AI ANN FRANKS
>drawn cartoons are illegal
>nooo my literal computer can't compile illegal cartoons its my fault for having any association with a comptuer typing illegal commands into a process on itself to generate "illegal" content and spamming it on the internet
>nooo just because i mined the first grain of sand for the silicon chip that decided to create and spam e-girlcon photographs on the internet that means i'm guilty byassociation
>i should ahve never picked up that grain of sand off the beach and submitted it into the silicon process i can't beleive i'm guilty of this crime
based talmudic overlords keeping our communities safe from deep fakes
>flag
>muzzies rape 100k white british girls
i sleep
>some autists posts things on the interbutts
real shit
Is child porn of non humans illegal? For example I can look at 2 naked dogs under 18 years of age and watch them have sex on video and it's not a crime.
These digital renditions are not of actual humans. What's the difference? They literally are not alive and can't reach the age of 18. They also only have 3 fingers thus are not of the human species. Is it illegal to make alien porn with small aliens? I'd be a hilarious defense attorney.
What are the political implications of no archive link or link at all.
americans think everything is illega, why?
Society
>feel love sick for niece
>have not coomed in a week
i want her number.
Why are those hands white?
Most pedos are brown.
> man is sentenced
> crime is not considered completed
Should have had AI write the article, this shit makes no sense
All porn is evil and should be destroyed and its creators hanged
To be
The One
>CON PELITO NO HAY DELITO
repeat after me
>CON PELITO NO HAY DELITO!
He didn't make it. The AI did
She's legal here mate.
I can and do frick prime b***hes and there's nothing you can do about it.
rate my ai waifu
Mr Ann Frank Bean
AI is going to put all the real pedophiles out of business.
2 meter tall (old) fat ((grandma)), tall elderly (hag) staring blankly with dead eyes, 6 foot granny with wrinkles, low hanging saggy breasts hanging by long floppy roast beef pussy lips, (liver spots), saggy skin, [missing teeth], hunchback posture, mustache, ~~*Alzheimer's patient*~~, armpit hair and leg hair, grandma wearing [diaper|bikini], in an old folks' home, (hyperrealistic hd photo of a 90 year old woman craving the sweet release of death)
Negative prompt: feminine, cute, innocent, virgin, healthy skin, shapely, fit, tight, breedable, petite, fun, pretty, attractive, loyal, nice, pretty, happy, young
Is this prompt safe enough? What else should I add, Your Honor? I just want to check and make sure that this particular string of characters is protected by the First Amendment.
Yes, you can fap to this
hello sonny
if there is no victim there is no crime
You can do it legally but you have to be israeli
Some richgay should just pay that midget b***h who looks an 8 year old for her nudes and then just train the ai on her, ethics resolved.
The prosecutors going for this under current laws are moronic, these people will need to be re-tried under new laws at best or released at worst.
Arrest everyone who owns a slasher movie for owning a snuff film.
what country was this, kek
Could have just as easily been Aus but the pic says Skaraborg District Court so I think Sweden
they don't send you to gulag for calling someone a pedo in UK yet?
NO ONE CAN STOP ME FROM PROMPTING CUNNIES 24/7
So you're telling me that making a gore game (sometimes with death kids) is not illegal but making fake cp is illegal
What a clownworld