Let's be honest here, if it wasn't for AI there would be a real risk that in 20+ years from now humanity would've dumbed down to a poin...

Let's be honest here, if it wasn't for AI there would be a real risk that in 20+ years from now humanity would've dumbed down to a point where they couldn't maintain the society they inherit.

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    sage

    it's 17.
    2 + 5 x 3

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ofcourse it is 17, but the problem is that people are so confidently wrong and just don't fricking care. I feel like schools are doing worse and worse every year, at what point will we simply no longer have enough regular people to replace the prior generations while we get flooded with imbeciles?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Black folk aren't people, Klaus.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      21 is a valid answer too. That's how maths works

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is why civil engineers of the future will fail to build functional bridges. Allowing Black folk to have a say in how math is taught is how you destroy a civilization

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The romans built colloseums, aqueducts, and bridges that still stand today without using any made up israeli nonsense like order of operations. They didn't even use algebra.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            They built the colosseum without proper algebra, true.
            We could easily build a colosseum 10 times taller [thanks to maths]

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            They build arches and put smaller arches on top of them. They spammed one tech.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >without using any made up israeli nonsense like order of operations

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        i see the "its MY truth" bullshit has reached stem fields as well

      • 2 months ago
        sage

        no, it is not.
        when you open parenthesis, and a number preludes it without a symbol separating it from the parenthesis, then that means that you multiply that number with the answer you got from the parenthesis.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's one way to do it. Let's not forget about black people math. It works just the same.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            why does it have a different name then Black person

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Shut your stupid fricking mouth and stop giving us burgers a bad name you mongoloid.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          How did you know I was a mongoloid? Oh, the flag.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          He's a Bri'ish slug larping as an American. You can tell from the way he said "maths" instead of math. "OI M8 ME MAFS IS FRICK c**t" say the Bri'ish. They make me fricking sick

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        21 is what I got and I’m literally moronic

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, math isn't that hard. People need to get over it. Some people get racist when it comes to math. I blame Donald Trump

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The moronation some people from the US are able to display, is beyond any ability of a troll. While you gave me a smile, I must point out what nobody. Not even the US folks themself, believe you. Turn off your VPN and go do something useful.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I readily believe you.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          yeah we know

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You know none of those hair or eye colors exist in japan right?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's ok we love you anyway, anon

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think we should come up with some distinct operator glyphs for that to work.

        Like it is technically fine (hard to work with, but fine) to have a mathematical language where you go from left to right always, but then I suggest using other glyphs for operators than the usual + - * / and implicit multiplication on (.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          the world has catered to morons enough, we don't need any more of it. frick off.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Except is 17, if you got 21 you didn't follow pemdas and are a Black person.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You didn't follow pemdas you dirty Black person.
          Parenthesis first.
          2+5 X 3
          Left to right
          7 X 3
          Solution
          21.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Darkie here doesn't know pemdas is an acronym for OoO apparently

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >parenthesis
            Which one? There are two of them

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              bait

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                > (
                > )
                Two. Two parentheses.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            2 + 5 × 3 is misleading because it actually should be rendered as

            (2) + 5(3)

            That's the error of your math and of the others who got 21, the order of operations goes left to right only after you deal with all parentheticals, which means all multiplying, as all multiplication is implicitly parenthetical.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >2+5 X 3
            You dumb Black person
            It's 2+(5x3)

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            order of operations, moron.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          2
          +5 ; 7
          ( ; push 7 and implicit *
          8
          -5
          ) ; pop *7 from stack
          ; 21
          ; dunno what kind of system pemdos is must be from one of those microcoded word processing calculators

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            P.E.M.D.O.S.
            parenthesis, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction.
            It's the order of operations in an equation so you arrive at the correct solution.
            So to solve the equation you solve the parenthesis, then do the multiplication, then the addition. You don't "solve to the left first".

            The answer is 17.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I would beat you with a rubber hose

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly. Don't forget math = science also. Very important.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Exactly. Don't forget math = science also. Very important.
          Math absolutely is not science. There's zero experimentation. There's zero observation. If it's anything, it's a branch of philosophy that happens to have some useful products for fields like science.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Even though it's bait, I hate you anyway

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >t. doesn't know what the distributive property is

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it’s not. The number directly outside thr parentheses is a scalar value for the value INSIDE the parentheses only.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it isn't. You're probably a Black person.
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mnemonics

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          In America, PEMDAS is advanced Mathematics now. Give him a break.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Let me help you, dipshit. 5(8-5) means 5 times 8 minus 5 times 5. 40 minus 25 is 15. 15 plus 2 is 17.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          this. thank you. there will definitely be morons asking you why you are multiplying 5 by 8 and 5 by 5 though.
          but yes, for non morons, you post shows there is no possible way to argue anything other than 17

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nice VPN, darkie

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Upvoting this post for visibility. In math, there can be multiple correct answers - this is why it's extremely important to have a diverse range of people from different backgrounds engaged in the problem solving process. You never know what unique perspectives and solutions you might find!

        Edit: Wow, thanks for the gold!

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >mathS
        Nice try, yuro falseflagger.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong.
        2+5(8-5)
        2+5(3)
        2+15
        17 is the only answer.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          why are you multiplying the 5 and 3? Seems moronic

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Order of operations.
            (3) is the remainder of (8-5).
            (3) is in parentheses and takes priority before the +2 addition.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How do you get 21? I'm a fricking moron when it comes to math but following pemdas, it's 17.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          2+5 = 7
          7 * (3) = 21

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Black person detected.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I hate you

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        only if you're black

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Factos

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        true, both 17 and 21 are valid.. who decided back then that it's PEDMA. either way it's either right or wrong and is wrong if it cannot be tested backwards.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          2+5 = 7
          7 * (3) = 21

          moron detected
          see

          right, so you dont know what i am talking about. therefore you should not be making this post [...]
          because you dont know basic maths.

          to expand the bracket you multiply what is outside the bracket by all terms inside the bracket. this is not ambiguous, it is not subjective. there is only one answer.
          > a^2 + ab

          now, if you do that non-subjective process with 5(8-5) you get
          > (5x8)-(5x5)
          which becomes
          > 40-25
          there is no alternative answer to this. this is simply a fact.
          now look at the original question, what is 2+5(8-5)
          this is always the same as 2+40-25.
          no exceptions. if you dont know this, or dont agree with it, you were not paying attention in math class at age 14 or 15, or you are not intelligent enough to have understood math class at age 14 or 15.

          and what is 2+40-25?
          I assume you can do that bit.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        See picrel

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why am I so dead set on doing 5 x 8 - 5 x 3? (40-25 = 15). School really did make us do an inefficient method of solving this problem? Like yeah 8 - 5 = 3 x 5 = 15. The latter is so much easier

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      1 minus 5 is negative 4

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ahhh, another order of operations slide thread

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This boomer faceburg tier shit is suffering.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it only works because /misc/ is even worse than FB and morons here take the bait and bump the threads

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          gen z doesn't know about not feeding the trolls and how to sage
          lack of gatekeeping killed this site

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Just look at /b/ and you know it is gonna come to /misc/ soon

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >just look at /b/.
              I haven't opened /b/ in over a decade.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Those idiots keep bumping this slide thread. I wish people would be smarter like us. It's just so frustrating!

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            beep bop

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You are painfully naive. If we don't bump the threads they will. Do you genuinely believe that that's some sort of an issue for them? Adapt.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yep
      Frickin PEMDASposters

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ahhh, another order of operations slide thread

      This boomer faceburg tier shit is suffering.

      >This boomer faceburg tier shit is suffering.
      i love you frens

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >another order of operations slide thread
        The traditional "order of operations slide thread" only exists because of the ambiguity of not using fractions to represent division
        This thread is about the deterioration of mathematic capability, and you not recognizing the difference is a prime example of that

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          go back to plebbit you absolute insufferable #iamverysmart homosexual
          even with your 8008135 YWNBAW

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You got it kido The israelites are out of control

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The normal moronic boomer order of operations memes at least have something to argue over since they usually have fricked up equation phrasing that precludes getting a right answer and you can biker over it forever. This one is straight up groid excellence.

      https://i.imgur.com/44R42rM.jpg

      Let's be honest here, if it wasn't for AI there would be a real risk that in 20+ years from now humanity would've dumbed down to a point where they couldn't maintain the society they inherit.

      It wouldn't be 20 years but in around a century, the IQ shredder (high iq people pooling into cities and taking on antinatalist wageslaving and ideology, not breeding and taking out all the smart genes out of the gene pool) would cull the system maintaining strata of the population of the developed world by an order of magnitude, to the point where we get unironic idiocracy-tier scenario. And it becomes practically unsalvageable since there'd be no one to perform embryo selection/modification on a mass scale to fix it and the moronic population won't be willing to adopt it due to superstitions.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The question is moronic trivia question, if was an important formula it would be properly annotated specifying the order.
    It's one of those question midwits uses to try and show they're smart when they're not.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Just because I'm in special ed classes doesn't mean I'm moronic.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      In my engineering classes I saw someone get roasted by a prof for notating something like this instead of using the much clearer fractional notation. Sage

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not only that there can only ever be one answer.
      Equations like these are not realistic. If you use them in the real world you will KNOW the answer before you even do the formula.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is formatted properly. That’s why we have order of operations moron

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is a fundamental question about how arithmetic operations are handled. This is not in anyway trivial. Basic? Sure, but not trivial.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    But is that my problem? I think not. I stick to myself, I am a sage of my own competence and care not for the problems of the darkened masses of the future.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is literally satanist abomination

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    PEMDAS

    This is why you will never see a Black person/Hispanic in Calculus. It's a requirement for engineering majors yet you see Black folk working for SpaceX.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      All white people need to boycott traveling via commercial flights while Boeing hires unqualified Black folk and poos to work on aircraft. White technicians will rarely frick up, subhuman brownoid diversity hires with room temp IQ do not care and have secret seething hatred for huwhites and will slowly aircraft fleets. And airliner companies have already accounted for your untimely death in their insurance balance sheets.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's 55. Any other result is trolling

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how is AI going to stop that? it'll only accelerate it if anything.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. AI isn't good or neutral, am I the only one around to call this whole insanity what it really is or am I being called a conspiracy theorist again until we find out?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dont need them to maintain it cause of ai.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black women don’t chemically castrate prepubescent boys like white women do. Frick IQ if too much of it produces demons like you aryans.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      get back in your forrest gump societal hole you fricking subhuman

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >if it wasn't for AI there would be a real risk that in 20+ years from now humanity would've dumbed down to a point where they couldn't maintain the society they inherit.
    The sad thing is AI fricks up left right and sideways and future generations will be too stupid to recognize it when they see it

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >humanity would've dumbed down to a point
    Nice euphemism for more browns and blacks.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    2+5 (8-5)

    Parenthesis first.

    2+5 X 3

    Left to right

    7 X 3

    Solution

    21.

    This is why your math teacher made you show your work AND made sure assignments weren't just the problems with the answers in the back of the book.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you almost got me to respond, have (you) for the bait effort

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Since when do you go left to right? Its BIDMAS or PEMDAS if American

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Arabs made math and they read from right to left. So that's why you do math from right to left.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's not right to left or left to right, Black person. It never fricking was. Multiplication before addition and subtraction.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Then
            Write
            It
            In
            That
            Order
            gay

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Arabs made math

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think 7x3 is 21. Do 8x2 instead and the math will be easier. Counting by 3s it too hard.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      kek, if not trolling lookup BODMAS

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        bitches don't know about bodmas

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i know about ligma

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      only operations of the same precedence are evaluated from left to right. multiplication has higher precedence than addition moron.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's not funny to make math jokes.
      you stop that right now.
      PEDMAS
      multiplication and division are clearly before addition and substraction
      repent
      repent now!

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    im moronic, can't do basic addition. Gib me welfare cracker, im heading to El Paso.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://streamable.com/h460si

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    who made this "left to right" thing?

    here i learnt operation hierarchy only.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Only thing you learned is to process cocaine and be a parasite, colombian Black person.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      In order for multiplication or division to interact with the rest of the equation before it, it requires that there be a known value to multiply or divide by. Thus the sum or remainder of any part of the formula must be found before multiplication or division can be applied to it. The same works in reverse, in order for sums/remainders to interact with multipliers/divisors to their right, the value must be known. That's why I'm this case the 8-5 is bracketed. You arrive at the multiplier first and then solve the section to its left to find what it's multiplying.

      But you're a shitposting neet troon on a VPN so none of this matters to you. You're just after (You)s, which is why I withheld it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 months ago
          Sage

          >rip the equation in half to the left instead of solving it

          This is why your people lost WW2, never went to the moon and are being replaced by people who wipe their asses with their bare hand and then use that same hand to touch your food and rape your women.

          (You) withheld as well.

          >politics

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >rip the equation in half
            Black person, PEMDAS requires you to resolve the multiplications before additions. Your mumbo jumbo shit somehow picks and chooses what to resolve and what not. Your shit makes no sense, why would you even resolve the parentheses first when you decide the order however you feel like while ignoring the rest of PEMDAS?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Cause he's a dumb fricking moron.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Can you show the version that makes 21?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >believing a machine
          ngmi

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    > (2 + 5)(8 - 5)
    > FOIL METHOD
    > 16 - 10 + 40 - 25
    > 21
    The negress was right

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      except you aren't multiplying the parenthetical by 2, only 5

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this would be distribution
      2 + 5(8-5)
      >2 + 40 - 25
      >42 - 25
      >17

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pfft… computers made people incredibly lazy, ai is just cherry on a lazy Sunday.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    2+5= 7
    ( 8- 5 ) = 3
    7x3=21

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the answer is 10 there is no indication of times therefore ts 8 minus 5 which is three and the next sum 2 plus 5 is 7 add the 3 which is ten

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anon, without the dumbing down we wouldn’t have people like you, so fricking stupid they think a computer running software has intellect and will be anything other than another false god used to manipulate the masses.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's going to take a long time to create a god. That's why one doesn't exist yet. We are getting closer though.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You are correct in that the more understanding is abandoned for belief, the closer you get to a god, and this is the path of what is being called AI. Esoteric knowledge is how these deceptions thrive.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    tfw I acutally had to read this few times to understand how can anyone came with 21 with doing parentheses first

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      By ignoring step 3 for whatever reason

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        but this is what children in europe at age 9-10 learn

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Children in the US also learn it but it's then followed by 6 years of holocaust/Black person class and rigid social programming so anything slightly useful is just replaced

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is it this PEMDAS V BODMAS bullshit again. FFS!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      PEMDAS and BODMAS both solve muliplications before additions. Both reach 17.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its 27 because you have to use distributive property with 5 and the numbers in the bracket

    2+ (40-25)

    27

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >40 - 25 = 25

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jews did 9/11 and Covid to take away your freedoms.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I was already to start arguing, but this is not even a "controversial" formula.

    Of course mult goes before +.
    But many people seem to think that implied multiplication is not a special case of multiplication. `5(3)` is not the same thing as `5x3`. We know that we can rewrite the given formula as
    > `2+(40-25) = 2+15 = 17`

    Math does not magically change for algebra.
    But it does not even matter in this case as their are no other operations to do other than that + and of course that goes dead last.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i honestly don’t know how to answer this cause the teachers that taught me did such a bad job, it got voided from my brain with most of the other math stuff

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I got -13 but I forgot if +- goes to + or -
    So it's between - 13 or 17

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The right answer is 10 you morons.
    2+5 = 7
    8-5 = 3
    7+3 =10

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that’s what i was thinking cause where the frick do you get x3 from?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        also wouldn’t it have made more sense to write it like 2+5 + (1-5) to signify your adding the right to the left and not subtracting to help alleviate confusion for some people like myself

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Hahahahahahahaha
          5(x) is multiplication dumbest

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            well my moron teachers never taught us this for some fricking reason.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              You just don't remember or you had common core fake math. They taught us 5(5) is 5 x 5 in math language

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        2+5(8-5) becomes 2+5(3), which is the same as 2+15
        What you have is basically “5 of 3,” or 3x5

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why is the internet so disconnected from reality?
    Calculus is taught in high school (17-18 year olds) while anontards with brain damage can't solve an elementary school level expression

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i make up for my stupidity in math by learning other stuff like agriculture, cooking, history and the such

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I fricking hate those posts because all of the midwits fricking entirely get it wrong. There's two answers because it's written ambiguously.
    >but but muh order of operations
    There's literally no universal order of operations. They're just conventions. This is why in the beginning of every single serious mathematical text there's a passage that describes what notation conventions they are adhering to. Every single mathematical journal in their submission guidelines has their preferred conventions laid out.

    It's a map is not the territory situation. Without being told what notation conventions are being used, it can go either way. The notation style is not the mathematical idea that someone is trying to express. Unless they actively mean it to be ambiguous, they failed. They doubly failed too considering that they didn't specify what notation conventions are being used AND they did not include brackets to remove the ambiguity. This is like a dangling participle in English.

    >tl;dr Your failure to be able to write something competently isn't a failure of the reader.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You complete any parenthetical before doing other operations, moron. Put that in a calculator properly and you will only get 17. Implied multiple next to a parentheses is standard notation.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        oh?
        https://www.dcode.fr/reverse-polish-notation

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >polish math
          >can't into space even

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Didn't claim RPN was good, but it's definitely a thing and definitely kills any idea that "put it into any calculator" is a defense.

            What's hilarious is if you read the manual for any calculator, it'll describe in detail the order of operations used. Excel and the free calculator in windows do the same.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, and what order do they use 'masters in mathematics'? They use standard pemdas.

              https://youtu.be/EHV0zs0kVGg?t=141

              I too enjoy the blues brothers

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                lmao, they use whatever the journal they're trying to get published in tells them to use outside of times deviations are necessary to more clearly express what you're trying to express, in which case they discuss deviations from the *journal's standards* (emphasis because they aren't necessarily what you were taught in middle school).

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, the calculator by default, uses pemdas because it is by and large the most used notation.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Amazing how high level discussion is so easily derailed. Long live the boomers. Boomer immortality!

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The browning and blacking of the world makes even the dumb ass white seem fairly intelligent by comparison. Honestly, if you are Gen Z and you don't get rich af as a white man, you are just lazy.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are Black folk so confidently wrong always?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I got 21. How the frick did he get 17?

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Please excuse my dear aunt Sally
    5(3) first then plus 2

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    YOU ONLY GO LEFT TO RIGHT IF YOU'RE A LITERAL NPC BECAUSE THAT'S HOW MACHINE WORKS YOU FRICKING SOULLESS MONGREL

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Uh, no. I go left to right because I'm white and that's how we read.
      If you want the operations done in a certain order then write them in that order, dickface.

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Basic maffs be too hard for wypepo. Maff be too spicy!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Zero famous black chefs, zero famous black restaurants. The only thing close was fictional shit like Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    X(Y) = X times y
    it's multiplication

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it only means multiplication if its a singular number but in this case it represents to solve the subtraction first then to add it to the left, if i remember

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nooooooo
        Pemdas
        Parentheses; exponents; multiplication; division; addition; subtraction

        The only order of operations allowed with our current math language

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        if you were to get 21 it would be 2+5 [3] not
        2+5 (8-5)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s always multiplication just not always directly solvable so it has to be simplified some other way. Obviously with plain numbers you can just calculate the outcome.

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    please excuse my dear aunt sally

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Order of operations thread
    Haven't seen this kind of slide thread in a while. Nice touch to disguise it as a twitter-bullshit slide thread. Usually you homosexuals just type out the fricking equation and let all the morons bite at it like a bunch of cocaine-addled pitbulls.
    >lets be honest here
    but you're not being honest at all... :3

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tries to use non-PEMDAS math to solve problems for his controller board
    >ends up frying his PIC microcontroller
    "The math I used was correct math too though!"

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a learning disability and even I can do this shit.

    I am literally moronic and still managed to get a civil engineering degree

    how fricking moronic are normals?

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    In other words muttian engineering should be avoided at all costs?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you know the joke
      whos walking at german streets at 8-16?

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What you should know from this thread is not that it's a slide, it's that advanced math is a GAME, an intellectual put-on by the elites to siphon more time and money from us thus keeping us from our lives.
    Yes, one needs to know math to live, if one is to create and be competent, but that kind of math from OP's twatter is just garbage.

    P.S. My fricking PUBLIC school taught me wrongly I guess.
    P.P.S At least I had several teachers in the family to perfect my English, you non-adverbing sons o' b***hes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      But the math in OP is very simple and ordinary, there's no exotic higher level aspects to it, it's just addition/subtraction and multiplication.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        see

        I fricking hate those posts because all of the midwits fricking entirely get it wrong. There's two answers because it's written ambiguously.
        >but but muh order of operations
        There's literally no universal order of operations. They're just conventions. This is why in the beginning of every single serious mathematical text there's a passage that describes what notation conventions they are adhering to. Every single mathematical journal in their submission guidelines has their preferred conventions laid out.

        It's a map is not the territory situation. Without being told what notation conventions are being used, it can go either way. The notation style is not the mathematical idea that someone is trying to express. Unless they actively mean it to be ambiguous, they failed. They doubly failed too considering that they didn't specify what notation conventions are being used AND they did not include brackets to remove the ambiguity. This is like a dangling participle in English.

        >tl;dr Your failure to be able to write something competently isn't a failure of the reader.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          So it's 17 and 21.
          How israeli.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It is only 17.

            if you dont get the same answer from
            >5(8-5) +2
            as you do from
            >2 + 5(8-5)
            then you have the wrong answer

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It is only 17
              Wrong:

              I fricking hate those posts because all of the midwits fricking entirely get it wrong. There's two answers because it's written ambiguously.
              >but but muh order of operations
              There's literally no universal order of operations. They're just conventions. This is why in the beginning of every single serious mathematical text there's a passage that describes what notation conventions they are adhering to. Every single mathematical journal in their submission guidelines has their preferred conventions laid out.

              It's a map is not the territory situation. Without being told what notation conventions are being used, it can go either way. The notation style is not the mathematical idea that someone is trying to express. Unless they actively mean it to be ambiguous, they failed. They doubly failed too considering that they didn't specify what notation conventions are being used AND they did not include brackets to remove the ambiguity. This is like a dangling participle in English.

              >tl;dr Your failure to be able to write something competently isn't a failure of the reader.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                wrong

                Let me help you, dipshit. 5(8-5) means 5 times 8 minus 5 times 5. 40 minus 25 is 15. 15 plus 2 is 17.

                start with this: 40 - 25
                take out a factor of 5 and what do you get? you get 5(8-5). do you understand that? do you actually know what brackets are and do?
                now expand the bracket. 5(8-5) means what? 40- 25.
                so its 2+40-25
                this is the only possible answer 17 and anyone who says different is utterly moronic, possibly black or possibly has blue hair.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >start with this: 40 - 25
                How would you possibly know to do that, homosexual?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                expand this bracket 5(8-5) what do you get?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                5x8=40
                OK?
                -5
                that's 35. I dislike this israeli game.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                oh, so you are THAT moronic?
                do you know how to expand these brackets?
                > a(a+b)
                do you know how to do that? do you actually think the answer is
                >a^2 + b
                so you failed math. do you have blue hair?
                seriously, do you know how to expand a(a+b)
                ?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I can repair stuff around the house and build things like walls;etc, dickhead, how about you?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                yes, i can do that, and i can do basic math too though.
                did you not study math until age 18? did you only study it until the age of 15 or something?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Or something. Are we going steady now?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                so you cant expand a(a+b) right? so why are you in a thread about math when you cant do the math that is being talked about, then on top of that, arguing about what the correct answer is.
                what is a(a+b) expanded? its really simple. if you get it youll understand why you are wrong.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Dude, why are you replying to me still?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                because people as dumb as you are fascinating. i dont interact with people like you irl so i forget that 50% of people are actually double digit IQ. And I forget what that actually looks like. interacting with you is a great reminder and can serve to explain what is going on in society and why.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                so, moron, you disagree with the answer 17 AND you disagree with the answer 21?
                because you think it becomes 2 + 40 - 5
                you are just even more moronic than the people who think it is 21. you basically cant do math. i bet you are an "artist". I bet you consider yourself a "creative"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I never came to any of those conclusions, even the one's in your personal attacks.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                yes you did, here:

                5x8=40
                OK?
                -5
                that's 35. I dislike this israeli game.

                you claim there that 5(8-5) is 40-5
                so you are saying the original question 2+5(8-5) is 2+40-5=37

                so you dont know how to expand a(a+b)
                you must have stopped leaning math at age 15.
                why do you keep digging? just acknowledge math is not for you.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Look at what I was being asked, you giant gorilla ape Black person.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                i did. i was the one who asked it. what is 5(8-3) expanded. and you said here

                5x8=40
                OK?
                -5
                that's 35. I dislike this israeli game.

                that it is 40 - 5
                therefore you disagree with the answer 17 AND you disagree with the answer 21?
                because you think it becomes 2 + 40 - 5 which is 37.
                just admit you dont have a clue what you are doing.

                now, on your claim that you have several english teachers in your family and that you are therefore great at english, did they teach you to put the apostrophe in the word "one's" here:

                I never came to any of those conclusions, even the one's in your personal attacks.

                did your english teacher family members teach you that?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You want to gay marry me. No. Denied.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                on your claim that you have several english teachers in your family and that you are therefore great at english, did they teach you to put the apostrophe in the word "one's" here:

                I never came to any of those conclusions, even the one's in your personal attacks.

                did your english teacher family members teach you that?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >But the math in OP is very simple and ordinary
          No it isn't. If they wanted someone to come away with: "What is 2+15?", they they should stop israeliteing-up math and ask: "What is 2+15?"

          See

          2 + 5 × 3 is misleading because it actually should be rendered as

          (2) + 5(3)

          That's the error of your math and of the others who got 21, the order of operations goes left to right only after you deal with all parentheticals, which means all multiplying, as all multiplication is implicitly parenthetical.

          You probably just weren't taught that multiplication is an implicit parenthetical operation.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Black person I have a masters in math focused on abstract algebra. I've forgotten more about this subject that you will ever know.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I appreciate and believe you, anon.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I fricking hate those posts because all of the midwits fricking entirely get it wrong. There's two answers because it's written ambiguously.
          >but but muh order of operations
          There's literally no universal order of operations. They're just conventions. This is why in the beginning of every single serious mathematical text there's a passage that describes what notation conventions they are adhering to. Every single mathematical journal in their submission guidelines has their preferred conventions laid out.

          It's a map is not the territory situation. Without being told what notation conventions are being used, it can go either way. The notation style is not the mathematical idea that someone is trying to express. Unless they actively mean it to be ambiguous, they failed. They doubly failed too considering that they didn't specify what notation conventions are being used AND they did not include brackets to remove the ambiguity. This is like a dangling participle in English.

          >tl;dr Your failure to be able to write something competently isn't a failure of the reader.

          see

          Let me help you, dipshit. 5(8-5) means 5 times 8 minus 5 times 5. 40 minus 25 is 15. 15 plus 2 is 17.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            more midwit midwittery.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >But the math in OP is very simple and ordinary
        No it isn't. If they wanted someone to come away with: "What is 2+15?", they they should stop israeliteing-up math and ask: "What is 2+15?"

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is basic b***h understanding of operation order before they introduce the variables, tyrone

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            see:

            see
            [...]

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >It is only 17
              Wrong:[...]

              >polish math
              >can't into space even

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                ?t=141

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >P.P.S At least I had several teachers in the family to perfect my English, you non-adverbing sons o' b***hes.
      ah that makes sense. people who cant do math always cope by insisting they are great at english, then resort to becoming "writers"

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >nooooo i Hate it that people are better at things tha me!
        Ironic.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        i actually guessed you had teachers in your family. it makes more sense now. teachers are incredibly mediocre people. that is why they had to become teachers.

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is 49(homosexuals):1(dune coon)?

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if you dont get the same answer from
    >5(8-5) +2
    as you do from
    >2 + 5(8-5)
    then you have the wrong answer

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    17

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I can't understand why these threads get so many replies saying it's something it's not. It's 17 even a grade schooler knows that.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because homosexuals like this think anyone cares about pollack math

      Didn't claim RPN was good, but it's definitely a thing and definitely kills any idea that "put it into any calculator" is a defense.

      What's hilarious is if you read the manual for any calculator, it'll describe in detail the order of operations used. Excel and the free calculator in windows do the same.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They get so many replies because this thread uses a mathematical equation written in such a way to be intentionally vague, because some sophist wienersucker loves watching idiots twist into knots justifying their answer to a question that has multiple answers.

      Which is why this is a slide thread, keeping people from discussing important issues (like homosexuals, roasties, and the latest drone gore porn from the Ukraine)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        But it's not vague at all

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >off by one
          sad trombone :3

  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    In this thread we can see a congregation of midwits trying to impress strangers that they know how to do a pointless math exercise.

    Truly fascinating to see these creatures so excited and happy over something so utterly meaningless.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dude, I got neighbors who mock me for taking pictures of birds, then they turn around and rev their car's engines for fun. People are tribal hypocrites.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      > math is pointless n shieeet
      Spotted the Black person.

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    7(3)

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >left to right after parenthesis
    I was always taught theres implication of parenthesis between the adjacent variable and the () though by multiplication

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's actually a national security emergency in this country because people literally cannot do math, while other countries like China and Russia are graduating more STEM majors, the US test scores in Math have been one of the few developed countries that actually have decreased since 2018. We just are not going to have enough engineers and we will lose our technological advantage over other countries if we can't get more competent engineers, and no not the Black folk they are hiring at Boeing.

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >YES I WOULD LIKE 2+5(8-5) APPLES PLEASE
    nonces every single one of you

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    21 and im a potatoe

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Any answer besides 17 is Black person-tier.

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i got -21 I might be moronic

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      its
      2x8 + 5x-5 which means -9 i dont know how you came up with -21

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        3x7

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        flag checks out

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    She literally multiplies 7*3 to get 21 and says "unless there is multiplication or division outside the parentheses", you just fricking multiplied.

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're all wrong, here is how to actually do it:
    >2 + ( (5*8) - (5*5))
    >2 + 40 - 25
    >17

    This is how to solve it if you drop the multiplication sign, it looks like extra work in this case but if you're working with more complex formulae it's a much easier method
    Sadly americans don't even learn about multiplication properties untill college kek

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >in 20+ years from now humanity would've dumbed down to a point where they couldn't maintain the society they inherit.

    Instead, it's happening RIGHT FRICKING NOW!

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn’t matter how so long as the technique of order of precedence is universally acceptable.

    Otherwise it seems like a concerted campaign to confuse the bollocks off our children so that zero educational progress is made.

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yep happened often enough in history

    Regardless we have ai so good luck we all need it

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I got 21 because frick everyone and everything

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    And here We, are folks.

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Numbers can be made to equate anything.

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    First do parentheses
    Then do multiplication/division from left to right as equal value operations
    Then do addtition/subtraction from left to right as equal value operations
    >2+5(8-5)
    >2+5*3
    >2+15
    >17
    if you got anything else you were from downtown public school full of Black folk.

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where the hell is everyone getting X 3 from? It’s asking what 2 + 5 is, which is 7, and then what 8 - 5 is, which is 3. So is the answer 7 or 3? Does it want me to add it together to make 10? Why is the second equation in brackets? Stuff like this is why I hate maths, makes no sense at all.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Brackets first, then multiplication, then the addition; that's how you get the correct answer.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      P = parenthesis
      E = exponents
      MD = multiplication and division, left to right
      AS = addition and subtraction, left to right
      anything else is Black person math

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Let us try this in real life
    First you need to know the unit of measurement used. I'll use meters(m) and seconds(s)
    Think about acceleration of your car/public transport/legs
    acceleration is calculated using the initial speed, the final speed and the time that has passed.
    If you start at 0 m/s and finish at 30m/s then your acceleration is expressed as time time taken to get from the initial speed to the final speed. You accelerate constantly for three seconds and you will reach 30mph after 3 seconds your acceleration is 10 meters per second. You take 3 seconds to go from initial speed of 0m/s (call it u) to final speed of 30m/s (call this v)
    So we make the equation
    a=(v-u)/t
    a(acceleration[measured in (meters per second)])=((v-u)/t)
    we now have an equation
    a=(v-u)/t

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a=(v-u)/t
      This is the same as saying 1(a=(v-u)/t)
      1(a) = 1((v-u)/t)
      take previous post numbers of 30 and 0
      a = (30-0)/3
      a = 30/3
      a=10
      OR
      1(a)=1((v-u)/t)
      >1(10)=1((30-0)/3)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Now we have tangible numbers lets hark to 8/2(2+2). Or 1~~*1(8)/1(2(2+2*~~

  67. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >~~*8-5*~~
    Oy vey

  68. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can literally google this fricking shit and get 17 people have no excuse

  69. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    people in here arguing "left to right"... and I've... never heard of going left to right at all.

    It was ALWAYS pemdas

    ..... this isn't a sentence you are reading it is a mathematical formula....

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I thought it was PEMDAS too what the frick Black folk

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/YoukoPf.jpg

      I thought it was PEMDAS too what the frick Black folk

      see

      P = parenthesis
      E = exponents
      MD = multiplication and division, left to right
      AS = addition and subtraction, left to right
      anything else is Black person math

  70. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >black maths

  71. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    2+40-25=17

  72. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black folk didnt learn elementary school BEDMAS.

  73. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    2 + 5 x 8 - 5 is 51
    I don't give a frick about your order of operations. Write the shit how it's supposed to be done, or suck my dick. No, seriously. You already sucked your teacher's dick when they "taught" you this and you said YES MASSA I DO WHAT YOU SAY MASSA. Fricking NPCs.

    PUTTING SHIT IN BRACKETS IS MACHINE CODE.

  74. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ~~*Elites*~~ were right releasing the covid scam mistery juice vax to cull people.

  75. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    When will you ever need to do math in this homosexual style? Kill all useless eaters.

  76. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    5x8=40
    40-5=35
    35+2=37 or by commutative property 2+40-5
    42-5=37

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You need to multiply that 5 by the 5 in the parenthesis to complete that use of the distributive property, big boy. So you will get 2+ 40 - 25

  77. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This sort of debate is why we should all just adopt polish notation instead.
    + 2 * 5 - 8 5
    Clear and unambiguous with no need for parenthesis.

  78. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you replied to this thread without saging you are definitely moronic.
    BEDMAS in Cana-duh

    Bracketa
    Exponents
    Division
    Multiplucation
    Addition
    Subtraction.
    The answer is is 17 Black person-tards.

  79. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >2 + 5(8 - 5)
    >2 + 5(3)
    >2 + 15
    >17
    morons who can't understand what it means to properly resolve the parentheses will never understand this

  80. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    iTS 21 in this universe and 17 in the one around the corner.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ok moron, if you are so good at math expand this bracket
      > a(a+b)
      this is not a trick question

  81. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its still the best trick to boost a new account on social media.

    Its 17 btw. If you find another answer you're probably not white, even if you look like it.

  82. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this nig calculates torque specs for boeing doors.

  83. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Let's be honest here

    Ok I'll be honest. Long algebra is fricking unnecessary knowledge for 99% of the population to know.

    Just another case of over-educated, useless homosexuals convincing working class bozos of their superiority.

    >omg he knows order of operations
    >he must be so smart
    >I guess I'll dig ditches all day while he sits around jerking to troon porn and inventing 50 new genders

    And the parasitic relationship of the working class and the useless intellectual pays itself out yet again for another generation. Nothing ever changes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >order of opetation
      >high skill math
      Jesus

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ok I'll be honest. Long algebra is fricking unnecessary knowledge for 99% of the population to know.
      Long algebra, are you a bot? just combining algebra and long from long covid like a bot would? Ofourse you are since a lot of posters here are just homosexual bots.

  84. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    17 and 21 are equally correct without more details. in engineering it would be 17 but accounting/simple math you'd get 21.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >simple math
      You mean incorrect maths? Formulas/equations function the same regardless of what discipline you're in.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        thats not true. calculus is a lot different than arithmetic.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          no it isn't you idiot. The rules from arithmetic still apply to calculus

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no they are not equally correct. expand this a(a+b)
      what do you get?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        depends on what A and B are equal to. not enough info for that equation.
        if A=1 and B=0
        the answer is 1.
        if A=1 and B=2
        3

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          no you fricking moron, just expand the bracket. dont replace a and b with digits, expand the bracket giving your answer in terms of a and b.
          if you dont know what im talking about you should not be answering the OP.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            how do you answer it without numbers? give me the answer to the equation and i'll backtrack to figure out the numbers. if the answer is 12 then for example
            A=2 B=4

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >expand this a(a+b)

              a^2 + ab

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                if a=2 and b= 4
                2 x 2 + 2 x 4?
                4 x 8
                24 ?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >2 x 2 + 2 x 4?
                yes
                >4 x 8
                no, 4 + 8
                so 12

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                no because you are distributing the values. this is like 1 half of FOILing. when you have expanded it fully you never multiple you just combine the like terms.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              right, so you dont know what i am talking about. therefore you should not be making this post

              17 and 21 are equally correct without more details. in engineering it would be 17 but accounting/simple math you'd get 21.

              because you dont know basic maths.

              to expand the bracket you multiply what is outside the bracket by all terms inside the bracket. this is not ambiguous, it is not subjective. there is only one answer.
              > a^2 + ab

              now, if you do that non-subjective process with 5(8-5) you get
              > (5x8)-(5x5)
              which becomes
              > 40-25
              there is no alternative answer to this. this is simply a fact.
              now look at the original question, what is 2+5(8-5)
              this is always the same as 2+40-25.
              no exceptions. if you dont know this, or dont agree with it, you were not paying attention in math class at age 14 or 15, or you are not intelligent enough to have understood math class at age 14 or 15.

              and what is 2+40-25?
              I assume you can do that bit.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're correct don't let them tell you otherwise.

          >expand this a(a+b)

          a^2 + ab

          >10=9
          nonsense

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >in engineering it would be 17
      no, frick no
      t. PhD in physics, noticeably with an engineer diploma

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        > i have a phd
        > and my argument is
        > in the name of frick, no
        phds are priests of frick

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The damge of diversity is already next to permanent and will echo into the next 200 years even with TND

  85. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    These have become my favorite threads because I learn so much from the smart stem anons.

  86. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >t's be honest here, if it wasn't for AI there would be a real risk that in 20+ years from now humanity would've dumbed down to a point where they couldn't maintain the society they inherit.
    Your dumb take almost proves the point you're trying to make. You're just too moronic due to tech to understand cause and effect, tech and proto AI has caused you to dumb down. Judging by the current state of "AI"it just intakes info while taking orders on certain levels to prioritize certain prompts. Just use Black person, tr00n, etc in all your messaging and the AI can't do shit.

  87. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Our very own STCs

  88. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who do you think is programming and training AI's?
    (hint, it's not the smart people).

  89. 2 months ago
    sage

    >What answer did you all get?
    Jesus.
    2 + 5 (8-5) pemdas
    2 + 5 (3)
    2 + (5 x 3 =15)
    2 + 15 = potato.

  90. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If the answer isn't 6,000,000 IDGAF.

  91. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think these fairly simple math equations are a perfect example of how and why math isn't as infallible as we make it out to be. Its the basis for how we count history. I hope only other anons can see that math isn't this monolith that is unquestionable.

  92. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The fives cancel each other out do the answer is +6

  93. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    damn all yall homies are moronic, you cant solve an expression

  94. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    X-Y=Z

    X being original population of Israel
    Y being number of Israelis killed by Hamas
    Z being new population of Israel after Hamas spree

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      tfw Z is larger than X and Y combined.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That is how sad feels.

  95. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    PEMDAS stands for Paedophiles Exhibiting Mathematical Deficiency And Spasticity. You don't want to be a PEMDAS, do you? Therefore the answer is 21.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *