Kek, I saw a thread a few days ago and OP said "artists are safe because at least AI can't generate 3d models..."

Kek, I saw a thread a few days ago and OP said "artists are safe because at least AI can't generate 3d models..."

  1. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I saw an AI generated animation on rule34.xxx it's over.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's funny because those boorus are probably the best way to train AI hentai creation.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        large, well-tagged collections of images, with a somewhat similar theme = profit

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          The only booru that can be considered "well-tagged" is e621. Everything else, especially the popular ones like rule34, are a complete mess.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sankakucomplex is also well-tagged but I wouldn't consider it a booru.
            Actually using the site sucks because of the ads and you need a userscript to disable them. Honestly I just download stuff from it through Hydrus instead of browsing that shitty site.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      post link

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        POST LINK moron

        LINK YOU gay

        Sorry, I was asleep.
        It was actually on rule34.paheal.net.
        https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/5389072
        It isn't very good but still kinda impressive.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          I like it

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >artchuds seething in the comments
          Tick tock...

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Tick tock
            no it's paheal.net

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          lol the text
          But this is really good it doesn't even randomly switch characters halfway. Artchuds on suicide watch

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      POST LINK moron

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      LINK YOU gay

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh shit, this is too close to home. How far off is this from ruining my comfy WFH inventor modeling job?

      https://i.imgur.com/ud0lmsj.gif

      Holy fuck that was fast.

      This is what we've been saying to you over and over again. Things will move VERY quickly.

      Is AGI this decade possible at this point? Shit is moving so quickly and it will get even faster

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        probably not
        but you don't need it for regular ai to disrupt society into anarchy

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        AGI might be actually impossible.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Orville Wright, who, along with his late brother Wilbur, pioneered aviation in America, has said that the men planning to make transatlantic flights were ‘absolutely foolish’.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            No aspect of consiousness is understood. Also the brain is a million times more complex than an airplane.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Consciousness is not required for AGI. If an AI can replicate absolutely every behaviour we consider "intelligent" using mundane statistical methods its still AGI.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not saying it is not impossible but airplanes were extremely complex back then but we figured out a way to do transatlantic flights. The rate in which technology improves is exponential. This year has been the best proof of this. There have massive breakthroughs in plenty of fields. The US successfully achieved net energy gain in nuclear fusion. It may seem impossible now but data is getting shared faster every year. Things are moving fast and might figure out things that we thought impossible before.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The US successfully achieved net energy gain in nuclear fusion
                No they fucking didn't, there's a reason they didn't include the (abysmal) efficiency of the laser in their calculations. Toruses are closer, and they've been "twenty years away" since 1950.
                >two more decades

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                eh, it's a win technically, let the fusion nerds have it, it's going to take a while
                >two more decades
                I'd say 30 or even 40
                it's something for our grandkids to work on

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I see you missed the sarcasm in my distancing quotes.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >"twenty years away" since 1950
                When you look at
                1) how little funding has gone to it
                2) how much political bullshit has obstructed it
                it becomes obvious why fusion is always 20 years away.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >"twenty years away" since 1950
                When you look at
                1) how little funding has gone to it
                2) how much political bullshit has obstructed it
                it becomes obvious why fusion is always 20 years away.

                There are lectures on youtube of profs talking about research into improved confinement and how they waited 10-15 years from coming up with theories to actually seeing those theories validated in small-scale experiments in the lab, due to funding constraints. These were ~$100k experiments, not $millions.
                Further, just look at the history of ITER, it's a quagmire of political butfuckery and red tape. It likely could have been finished 15 years ago if it was just 1 or 2 countries building it, or if the governments involved just gave grants to an independent body, but that wasn't the point of the project.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >No they fucking didn't,
                Yes, they fucking did. 2 megawatts of electricity went in, 3 came out. An estimated 230 kJ of energy hit the pellet, and 1.3 MJ left it. That's net, no matter whether you want to talk about how much electricity went into starting it or not. You can read the reports if you'd like.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            No aspect of consiousness is understood. Also the brain is a million times more complex than an airplane.

            The educated skeptic or the naive buffoon.
            Taking bets?

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's easy to draw up a list of all the things people said were impossible that actually weren't, but you conveniently forget the even larger list of things people claimed were possible that actually weren't.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >larger list
              can we see it?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally ever snake oil salesman ever. Promises of things like "negative latency". Buzzwords, hype, etc. It happens all the time, every day. If you want to fall into the hype and claim that something is possible because other things have also been possible in the past and that's the outcome you'd like to see then feel free.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Shit is moving so quickly
        This tech, in it's exact form you are seeing now, has been around since 2016 at the latest, 2011 at the earliest. The only thing that has changed - literally the only thing - is that GPU hardware is that the algorithms have been optimized enough to do it with home-level hardware requirements instead of needing 256GB of VRAM. That is literally the only thing that has changed.

        Absolutely none of this is new.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          What is that logic? Ok cool that means we’re 10 years behind and they can probably replace us in most jobs

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What is that logic?
            We're not ten years behind - what you're looking at is exactly where it has been for, at the longest, 11 years already. That logic is that you're already looking at the peak of what the tech can do. The accuracy of machine learning and various AI has already been above 99% for a long damn time as far as technology goes. The existing problems that were holding this sort of AI back - overfitting to certain characteristics in the data, vanishing gradients, exploding gradients, the need for pre-labeled data, the ability to have unsupervised learning - have largely already been solved, a long damn time ago. Literally the only thing stable diffusion did was achieve the same level of accuracy for drastically less resource cost. And we're not getting dramatically better than where we're at, for the simple fact that even if you could store the meaningful characteristics as a single byte of data, you're still looking at billions of learned characteristics to achieve this level of accuracy. It's always going to take gigabyte of VRAM to do these jobs. And since Moore's Law is dead, we can't expect the explosive gain in computing power that took 50 years to bring deep learning from when it was invented in the 1970's to useable today anytime soon.
            This is it. This is the peak of this tech. It's not getting drastically better any time soon. You're talking another 50 years.
            This tech is not dramatically improving. There's literally less than a single percent of accuracy left for it to gain. It can't make major improvements in hardware efficiency anymore, and there's no explosive leap-forward in tech on the horizon.

            What's left is novel applications of existing AI, and that's about it. You might see some very, very, very weak AGI in the next 20 years.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              you are a fucking retarded the fact we can now run it on home systems means that it is ten years away you fucking idiot. have a nice day.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nah AGI wouldn't possible

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Carmack thinks it's 7 years away.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      large, well-tagged collections of images, with a somewhat similar theme = profit

      >well-tagged
      top lel
      most of the time gay shit isn't tagged well so no matter how much I try to filter it out I always get some anal, yaoi, futa, bara material
      our only hope is AI learns to tag them
      but now it's a chicken and egg problem

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >-male/male
        was it really that hard

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          only if it's tagged like that
          same applies to solo_male
          the problem is it's not always tagged

  2. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    What

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >text-to-nft

      jfc

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        perfect way for social media "influencers" to scam their low IQ audience with less effort
        >logan paul spends 5 seconds writing some proompts
        >AI shits out some nfts
        >"HEY GUYS TODAY I'M OFFICIALLY LAUNCHING THE PROJECT I'VE BEEN WORKING ON FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS! I'M SO EXCITED FOR THIS BECAUSE I WANTED TO GIVE BACK TO THIS AWESOME COMMUNITY WE'VE BUILT TOGETHER"

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/w2No4xG.png

      Kek, I saw a thread a few days ago and OP said "artists are safe because at least AI can't generate 3d models..."

      I saw an AI generated animation on rule34.xxx it's over.

      this is great, in 5 years the "shitty free versions" will be better than the best ones today, and everyone will be btfo

  3. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit, this is too close to home. How far off is this from ruining my comfy WFH inventor modeling job?

  4. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who gives a shit about artists, I give a shit about what steam's front page is going to look like once every aspect of a game can be easily generated. Here I thought 10,000 games we already get was bad enough.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I give a shit about what steam's front page is going to look like once every aspect of a game can be easily generated
      AAAAAHHHHH!!!

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      who cares about buying if you can just ask an AI to make you games?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds like more trouble than it's worth.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        The real problem is the same as it's always been: automation always greatly reduces quality in exchange for greatly reducing the time/effort/resources required to create a similar (not same) thing.
        So now you will never be able to find an indie game again, because only AI-generated unplayable crap (think marvel movies but in game form) will litter the first 100000 pages of any game store.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not much will change though.

          AI generated 3D with AI voice and AI story and so on vs. npc pixel art shovelware

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            You don't understand. It will be 10x WORSE than npc pixel art shovelware.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >So now you will never be able to find an indie game again
          indie devs are arrogant whiny pricks that demand the world to worship them because they shat out a mediocre game. I hope they get replaced. gamedevs are next after the artpoor slaughter is complete

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just when you thought it couldn't get worse than soulless yearly AAA trash you get soulless yearly machine generated AAA trash. And people will buy it. There's probably no practical difference between a machine generated FIFA and the real thing except that the former is cheaper and thus makes more profit.

  5. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Finally lazy japanese gays on seppuku watch

  6. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like a bunch of styrofoam 3d model not even practical for commercial use.

    Boring

  7. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can I make my own models using AI in blender now? I wanna explore my creativity and scenes I made in my head when I was a kid

  8. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Holy fuck that was fast.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is what we've been saying to you over and over again. Things will move VERY quickly.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, you guys predicted 10,034 out of 2 technological singularities.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Where did I say that?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's already a shitton of crossover between 2D and 3D art. Later's gonna be even easier for AI since it's governmed by math.
      t.split between /co/ and /3/

  9. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah its literally over for us software bros. Hardware is the future while software will be dominated by AI.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      hardware is designed using software, that can be controlled by AI though...

  10. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Joke's on them, because 3d "art" on rule34 was always pure spam and garbage quality.

  11. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    As an artist, it's gonna be cool to feed in your characters and watch them get turned into 3D models.

  12. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Any good ai for generating logo?

  13. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does it just do artistic figurines or can it do engineering models to replace cadmonkeys too?

  14. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    artists are safe because at least AI can't generate graphic novels (comics).

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      comics are just words and pictures
      that mean a writer can make comics without artists
      or even replace the writer with chatGPT

  15. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's generating pointclouds, NOT 3D triangle meshes. It's still (hard) work to generate a triangle mesh from a pointcloud

  16. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artists are still safe because all we have to do is rise up and physically destroy the Internet with blast force. Just because the legal system refuses to protect our intellectual property rights doesn't mean you win, it just means you've forced us to take our rights into our own hands and protect them extralegally.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Digital artists will destroy the means to make digital art to protect their digital art

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not just that, we'll destroy the art too, and never make more of it. You proved you don't deserve us, so now you don't get to have us. We're going to delete all your existing training data with bombs and then deprive you of any more by simply not making it, so even when the computer and GPU economy recovers from the attacks and the ML ecosystem follows suit, there will be nothing for your AI to learn from.

        IP is fucked. Enjoy being a pawn of the AI animated frozen corpse of Walt Gisney.

        >implying extralegal self-defense of rights is bound by law
        Nice reading comprehension retard

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous
    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      IP is fucked. Enjoy being a pawn of the AI animated frozen corpse of Walt Gisney.

  17. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    production level 3d modelling is a few orders of magnitude more difficult than concept-coomer image generation
    it would unironically be easier to just get networks to produce videos instead

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *