Judge finds flaws in lawsuit against AI art

>https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-judge-finds-flaws-artists-lawsuit-against-ai-companies-2023-07-19/

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Basically the judge told they cannot prove their art was used, and if it was used, they also don't have a legal standing because the generations are not the artists' art.
    Hilarious because that's what everyone told them since the start, but useful to create a precedent.

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    name an artist who didnt have an influence they ripped off.
    oh look, you cant.

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    > because they have access to the source code
    cringe. these judges think the images are somehow stored in "source code"? looks like globohomosexual israelitecorps are going to win solely because this judge is poorly educated on the subject. no surprise since it's usa and the judicial system will literally suck on the wieners of corporations for cash, free shit and favours.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can't even fricking read, pleas spare us your opinions on the justice system. The judge is saying "because you have access to the source code and can therefore see how the product works, I'm requiring you to go back and explain in more detail your theory of how this product infringes your clients' rights".

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        > can't even read
        >"cause you have access to the source code and can therefore see how the product works"
        I'm sorry that your fellow countrymen are such abject failures and have kangaroo courts. not my problem either.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          The us empire as it currently exists is everyone's problem

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >these judges think the images are somehow stored in "source code"
      No they don't. But the artists claimed they are stored in a model

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Haven't the courts determined that AI images can't get copyright anyway, because the art isn't made by a legal person?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes. but the problem is it can generate art made by others since it's just pattern recognition. that's the main sticking point. the datasets were compiled by scraping anything and everything from the net without a frick to give about anyone's copyright and now it can generate copyrighted images/protected IP. i think this will probably drag on for years.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's a standard called de minimis where you just have to show the most basic level of human input, a bunch of concept art, a few thumbnails, a specific character design you're aiming to replicate, anything to copyright something, and "i typed a few words into the AI" is not it.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why is she dressed so immodestly? Where is her father?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeh but the only people who care about that are the israelites.
      I'd be thrilled if I saw something I genned used in the wild.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      This won't last forever. Prompting takes time, there is thought and labor involved. You can cope all you want about it not being enough labor but again that won't last.
      >you didn't travel because you drove, it was too easy

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think the decision to say that prompts aren't sufficient is p stupid and inconsistent. Random drippings on a painting are able do receive copyright protection, but not words that describe the thing you want in detail? Bet they took pity on the brushmonkeys

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Exactly. I've said this before and I'll keep saying it but prompting is infinitely harder than photography is. Even at the most basic levels. No one is taking photos for 24 hours straight like any serious prompter. There is much less labor involved.

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artbros... we can't pencil ourselves out of this one.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      The line truely has been... drawn

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Badum Tiss

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >compressed images
    gottem
    precedent set up for the "collage tool" lawsuit

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just imagine... such groundbreaking technology... that could revolutionize the way we live... gets shut down... because artists, who use references and technology to make art anyway, feel "threatened"...
    Just imagine.

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    AIChads can't stop winning!

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Imagine being a hypocritical tradgay unironically believing you could battle AIchads
      kek

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Based. Too bad they got leave to amend. He should have dismissed them immediately

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *