I've just had a horrific realisation

>AI language models work by predicting the next word in a sentence based on statistical patterns.
>AI image generators work similarly to language models but generate images instead of text.
>Video generation techniques leverage statistical patterns but account for time-dependent data.
>Video generation involves predicting movements in 3D models including time as a 4th dimension.
Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
If anybody who has access to the new video generation/editing models, can you test how far it can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy?
I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    dont worry bro Jesus is coming back soon
    go to confession, get right with god

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >go to confession
      One only needs to confess their sins in private to The Lord you CATHOLIC SCUM! Catholics are in the traditions of MAN and are PAGANS and know not God.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Can we not make this a religious debate?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Can we not make this a religious debate?

          typical catholic wants to avoid religious debate because typical catholic knows nothing about religion. when christ returns he's going to mean-mug you and send you to hell.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Based and christpilled.
        Suffer not the heretic

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >go to confession
          One only needs to confess their sins in private to The Lord you CATHOLIC SCUM! Catholics are in the traditions of MAN and are PAGANS and know not God.

          You only know about christ because of catholic record keeping

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        There is no infallible church that is true, but there's no infallible christian either, I'd rather you not not split hairs in these trying times brother.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        GO TO CONFESSION

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Telling me to just have faith isn't helpful at all but I'll try.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      2 more millennia

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This occurred to me the other day:
      The singularity and the beast system will probably fulfill The Gospel's being preached to every corner of the earth.
      Imagine a scenario where not one living human isn't connected to the internet. That would make The Bible accessible to everyone. I could see the coming abomination ironically exposing some to Christ who never would otherwise have found out in theis life.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ai is the beast that is and is not and yet is
        the beast rising up out of the sea
        the sea being nations of people
        what is ai: a collective consciousness of all human intellect
        you can apply the anecdotal expression of is and is not and yet is to anything that ai has touched, take dignifai'd as an example

        the prostitute is not actually discreet
        the ai is making her discreet
        and yet it is preferable as an alternative, being what the ai clothed her

        >go to confession
        One only needs to confess their sins in private to The Lord you CATHOLIC SCUM! Catholics are in the traditions of MAN and are PAGANS and know not God.

        second

        https://i.imgur.com/af0i0nw.png

        Telling me to just have faith isn't helpful at all but I'll try.

        if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed anon, read the Word of God; Jesus is very much real and tangible to speak to and Him Speak to you

        being a christian is not a religion, it is a Relationship of Spirit and Truth with God

        also here is a 1hour lecture on how to apply wisdom and survive the tribulation

        Predicting future events accurately becomes increasingly challenging as the complexity of events and interactions involved in the video sequence increases and becomes highly dynamic... But let's assume it can predict with a high level of accuracy say... 5 seconds into the future... what are the implications?

        i wouldn't worry too much over the affairs of divination, God's Word States that He Sends a Strong Delusion to those that reject Him openly; albeit our generation of idolatry is nothing compared to the iniquity of times past

        there is a reason the phrase "fear not" is repeated more often than not in the bible as well

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          In what sense is the AI covering her?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah THIS time he'll come, lmao.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's not something to be mocked.
        God has forestalled His wrath out of a desire to see more of us saved. It could well be that some Methusaleh is out there living righteously for all of us.
        Do we rejoice in the coming of The Lord? Or do we dread it? Are we eagerly awaiting The Bridgegroom? Or are we acting like naughty teenagers just hoping we can wrap the party up before Dad gets home?

        Ask yourself if they are revealing AI technology to the masses now, how long have they actually had it?

        Decades for most things, but with this it is likely even older
        Who honestly thinks you can write a message and have it power a golem, or put a sigil on a piece of paper that causes a human-like automaton to act a specific way? Encoded information is ancient tech.

        You think that's crazy? This is really gonna blow hour mind. Guess what AI have already modeled? What do you think you are? Why do you think you're "human"?

        We're separate entities, possibly what the pagans would consider to be minor deities, that exist outside this dimension/reality and who are deeply immersed in a video game designed by the God of The Bible. We're the man sitting in the chair, and our bodies are avatars in the game. Divine revelation is necessary because understanding the world of the game does not explain the world of the player except where it is an imitation of it. The ghost in the shell model is wring because the shell is secretly, in fact, empty. Our consciousness doesn't exist here, just like if one avatar in a game were to pick apart another, he wouldn't find a man from our world inside it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >It's not something to be mocked
          yes it is
          2 more millennia and rabbi yeshua will surely reappear

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      2 more millennia

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Just 2 more millennia
      Jesus is real bros, trust me. the israelite books written between 80AD and 500AD prove it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >go to confession, get right with god
      Skip this bit. Get on your knees and pray directly to god through Jesus Christ. For you are saved and redeemed only through his sacrifice.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Polanon with the Jesus bullshit. /fpbp

    • 2 months ago
      Satan

      actually his right hand and firstmade is here.

      Ahura Mazda Black person.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He's not due back for another 1,000 years dumb Black person

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >catholic
      rip in hell

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, I think I’ll just pay my way in

      Confessions are for poor gays

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He ain't coming back bro. Look around. Bible tells us that evil will always run the world, it is what it is.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >another AI thread derailed by christcucks

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        After all

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      jesus comes forth to save man with his life giving light every morning. it's called the sun. external saviorism is a co-opted exoteric misunderstanding of an esoteric truth.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know who Jesus is and don't care to know. I'll ignore anyone who tries to tell me. I'm tired of people telling me about their prophet and how if they hadn't told me there was no way I'd be tortured after I die, but now that I know I have to go to their holy building once a week or I'll surely be tortured forever after I die

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Jesus is coming back soon
      That is what terrifies me the most
      the fulfillment of this oppressive system is the come of God and the establishment of the kingdom of God
      Be careful for what you wish for

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Predicting future events accurately becomes increasingly challenging as the complexity of events and interactions involved in the video sequence increases and becomes highly dynamic... But let's assume it can predict with a high level of accuracy say... 5 seconds into the future... what are the implications?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Predicting future events accurately becomes increasingly challenging as the complexity of events and interactions involved in the video sequence increases and becomes highly dynamic... But let's assume it can predict with a high level of accuracy say... 5 seconds into the future... what are the implications?

      Yeah, I mean, you broadly get the point of the whole thing. Look into Total Information Awareness and Total Information Control policies.

      This has been the plan since they started the computing revolution. The idea is to predict things in advance which is obviously useful for things like selling stocks before a big bad thing happens or maintaining power forever in your institution by detecting problems and stopping them in advance.

      The problem isn't prediction machines, the problem is prediction machines in the hands of the few, used at the expense of the many. Lack of transparency in their existence and operation, lack of public consent, etc.

      On paper, the purpose is to prevent boats from being sunk unexpectedly, but obviously you can do an infinite amount of interesting shit with any reasonably accurate forward-thinking prediction machine.

      Also, it need not use video. You can do this with any dataset. You can just track everyone's phone or internet usage for a long time, feed all that data to a model, and ask it "what happens next" then just compare that against what happens next.

      Improve model, repeat. In theory this is how advertisers send you ads that relate to things you said out loud -- not because you were hot mic'd but because the algo predicted "you'd do that next" and you said it. No need to record.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        We need to figure out how far they can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy. I wonder is this the real reason why they limited the publicly available version to only work on data pre-2021 or whatever date they set? Because if everyone suddenly has access to this..I guess the only word for it is "power", it changes the accuracy of predictions based on everyone knowing what happens next and different individuals attempting to alter predictions?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >We need to figure out how far they can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy. I wonder is this the real reason why they limited the publicly available version to only work on data pre-2021 or whatever date they set? Because if everyone suddenly has access to this..I guess the only word for it is "power", it changes the accuracy of predictions based on everyone knowing what happens next and different individuals attempting to alter predictions?

          No clue, would be cool to know that sort of stuff -- though I might need some drugs to sleep at night if that were the case.

          I suspect, as a hunch, that the predictions are not great. But there's two downsides to that:

          1) People will keep working on it to make it better
          2) at some point, it will be the default way decisions are made for people close to the machine, so when it does reach say "70-80% probability for 24 hour prediction" status, the odds that people make REALLY bad decisions that make no sense because a computer told them to go up exponentially.

          It's a suicide pact for the species, we should have had public debates about this idea in the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, and here we are in 2024, the shit you're talking about would be considered conspiracy to normies and yet it's very much where we're at.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it evolves
          >we evolve
          >it evolves
          >we evolve
          what could possibly go wrong lads

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i guarantee you the original application was for missile defense. predicting a soviet first-strike before it happened. the sdi, star wars, etc. was probably all obfuscation.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Let's say that was the tech in the infancy stage though. It's crazy just to think about all the fricking data they've trained it on over the just the last 20 or so years since the Patriot Act or whatever it was called they brought in after 9/11. My generation essentially grew up at the same time as it without even knowing, it's a fricking millennial with the knowledge of everything ever posted on the internet.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This, the AI takeover already happened.
        It was a bloodless coup.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I've never gotten a good ad in my fricking life

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wouldn't this AI just be the zero system from Gundam Wing? Despite all the predictions, the pilot still has to process and act on the correct path.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Gundam Wing
          Don't forget Mobile Dolls too - back in the 90s that show was already debating the ethics of drone warfare we have now.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            My face when /misc/ is Wu-fei.

            %3D

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Think of the advantage such a system could provide soldiers for example.
      Live processing combat footage would enable soldiers to know the exact location of individual enemy soldiers in real time, as well as how they will move on the battlefield.
      Image a soldier with a HUD that's tells him exactly where the enemy will be and when.
      Such a thing would never even be in a videogame because any game dev would consider it OP and boring.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      total world domination with 4 seconds to spare.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      op we had SEAS like 20 years ago lol
      we have simulated the entire planet across all data feeds
      watch devs for what Google israelites did w genai and quantum years ago

      yes anon, we can see the past and future centuries back and forth
      we have also already broken the laws of physics

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        quantum is a moronic theory based on little evidence
        because of only just 2 experiments that no homosexual in the academia could explain, we make this whole theory which disproves everything we know so far. everything

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting idea. Kind of a no duh idea. I assume it is near filed predictions like a couple seconds maybe a couple minutes. After a while it fill be a mirror staring at a mirror as AI becomes more influential; a recursive feed back loop. We've had automated systems forever so algorithms have been influence us and feeding back into the system for a while now. Ever point a camera at a mirror and zoom in or connect to a phone to another phone. Or get a small solar panel from a calculator and connect it to a small led light as a kid? Ever think about throwing it in a box with mirrored facing walls and imagine you'd be able to peep inside to see. Maybe the glow last just a little bit longer.

      I think the real potential is high-speed trading using AI. You could probably predict the market for a few seconds out within enough confidence to bet and bet big and make big bucks. But what happens when every one is doing this? Using the same algorithms? Do we see a shift in trading a new ebb and flow. Or wild ups and downs and huge micro crashes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      imagine if it were just isolating human predictions now based on correct predictions of the past. now it can see further into the future, potentially with a high degree of accuracy. Maybe not perfect, but maybe better than an individual human.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know. But I know Tom Cruise will star in the movie.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      not much, you and I can accurately predict 5 seconds into the future. If you showed me a video of a man riding a bike i can tell you he will continue to ride the bike for another few seconds. Now if a gorilla appears annd hits the man with a giant feather duster as he is riding his bike, both me annd the ai would have no idea. Every part of your life relies on predicting future events. If i throw a ball at you, you predict the path the ball will take and try and catch it. Stock brokers make future predictions of what the market will do everyday. A.I is currently better at making predictions of what the market will do and a lot of people make a lot of money off of this. Predicting the future isn’t magic, it’s just really hard, the question is how good can an A.I get at it? depends on the scenario. the further out the prediction and the more complicated it is the harder it will be.

      Now could an AI amass huge amounts of information and make startling predictions of human movements and reaction of populations, through the global survelaince (spelling) state we live in? yea i think so.

      You could say computer if i campaign in Ohio how would that affect my odds of becoming president? and it’d say increase by 12%
      but there are certainly people who do this kind of guessing as well, but maybe a.i could be much better at it

      another hypothetical, if you could simulate the entire earth with these magic a.i could you simply fast forward and look into the future

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ask yourself if they are revealing AI technology to the masses now, how long have they actually had it?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's being developed mostly by private businesses though, I don't think governments have had it, at least not advanced AI for decades or whatever you're implying. Maybe a year or so before the general public? How advanced is it actually right now is what I want to know, who has access to it (the israelites, yes I know), and what are they using it for?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the american government probably has god in a box in utah. probably.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Go watch The Minds of Men 2018, and you'll realize how fricked up society is.

          this isn't 'AI', this is some special adobe premiere cut.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >this isn't 'AI', this is some special adobe premiere cut.
            This. it's a morph cut. They shouldn't have used it because it's tacky as frick, but it isn't AI.
            AI makes much weirder frick ups.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If Nazi Germany had it. That means America has had it since then. Do the math.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Do the math.
          :>

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sure, just like social media and semi-autonomous electric cars were totally developed by private industry and weren't at all DARPA projects with public facing puppets.

    • 2 months ago
      Hitler Rick was Right

      I'm guessing at least a hundred years.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      decades

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >how long have they actually had it?
      About three fiddy seems like a fair estimate

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Who's they? You're fricking stupid if you think governments have had something like this before the public. They're the most inept organizations on the planet.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        this. jesus is this an AI thread it's stroking itself too? Did we forget the biggest consumers of government R&D money are private military contractors? The government can't figure out how to do shit. And most the muh military industrial complex is white collar money laundering almost always. The big guys just shit out something useful every few years to stay ahead of china and russia. We just got over a tech slump. This is no different than mobile internet becoming widely available or battery technology accelerating.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They've had it forever. That's why the version we got was so stupid. It was dumbed down. That's why it can draw beautiful pics, but always manage to frick up the fingers. Also, they released it now to cover for any and all future vids and pics of then fricking little kids.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ask yourself if they are revealing AI technology to the masses now, how long have they actually had it?
      Since the 1990s

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They said they had Sora AI a year ago, they're most likely full of it, and had longer than a year ago.
      The masses always get the new toys late and neutered, unfortunately

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I am convinced this is AI-generated and it has been on Youtube for over five years (yes the video date says ten years ago)

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You are worrying about the wrong thing. The NSA already has all the data they need to predict the future to a degree that actually matters and they have had that ability for decades. The fidelity might not be enough to deduce that you will order 3 shots at the bae instead of 4 but they sure as shit know you will be at that bar and when well before you ever set foot in the door. It's actually insane that crime still exists when we know that they know everything and they permit it all to happen.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe because up until very recently it has been humans rather than AI using that data to predict movements/actions?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, they can't process that data in real time at all, they may be able to look back and link a bunch of events to find some hidden player, but they can't predict the future to actually stop most of the crime.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, they can't process that data in real time at all, they may be able to look back and link a bunch of events to find some hidden player, but they can't predict the future to actually stop most of the crime.

      Seems like it's a matter of having
      >That resolution of data
      >Acces to "API end points" in standardized way to feed into a database
      >Processing power
      Seems likely considering there budget and what we see of commercial products.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Processing power
        Which is not very feasible since the real time monitor would require more processing power than all of the data generators combined to be able to make real time predictions.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I bet you are reading pol rn.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not all of it, even on the best day I can't even keep up with 1% of all the total posts in the day.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The NSA already has all the data they need to predict the future to a degree that actually matters and they have had that ability for decades.
      They don't. The weather people can't even predict the weather tomorrow correctly. Weather has less data points than humans / events.

      The Free Will law and the Law of Confusion . Makes it impossible to do any serious predictions. Anyone who claims they do simply lie.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        oh wait you did, by quoting two "laws" which would only be provable to be true if they were predictable to be true in the future, otherwise they wouldn't be laws.

        LMAO, what an utter moron you are.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI can predict future events accurately
    Take a video of me walking, ask AI to finish it, AI predicted I would keep walking in a straight line, In reality I pull my pants down and start pissing all over the room, it never even considered it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah ok, but imagine you aren't aware you are under active observation and you're not trying to trick the AI, chances are you have never spontaneously pulled your pants down and started pissing everywhere and the AI would have been correct, up to a certain point at least, how far into the future it can predict is what we can't know without testing

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The big test was covid-19.
        Does anyone remember in the beginning of covid-19 when the news reporters were always talking about what they termed " the prediction models ", or just " models " or "the modeling" ?
        Covid-19 was/is world wide social experimentation on several levels.
        Of course they ran and are running predictive programs with their undisclosed technologies.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        don’t doubt the man for his courage anon

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That’s why you’re all corralled here. An entire website full of bots and outliers. lol

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's best to become unpredictable

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I knew you were going to say that!
        And, next, you’ll argue that i I didn’t.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He means more our daily patterns as people and societies more than your meth psychosis states.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        These are already highly predictable on both individual and aggregate levels even without muh 'AI'

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anon's Uncertainty Principle

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Walk without rhythm and it wont attract the worm

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ai predicts i'll start walking
      >start wanking instead
      heh, outsmarted the Ai again.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI generators add a little bit of randomness into what is returned. That is why the results are different when you keep retrying with the same prompt.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I am of exactly the same opinion.

    I’ve often heard that most people go through life with a working vocabulary of a few hundred words. Once those are separated into the appropriate buckets (noun, verb, etc) it’s very easy to determine the very limited number of sentences one can express. Statistically monitoring the occurrence of various combinations would start to yield very actionable data regarding the sentiments of a given populace. New key words can be introduced a (memes -in the original definition - portmanteaus, etc) and then tracked for their percolation through that group. That info would establish the trace routes for signaling through a group -ie concept percolation, group leadership and such.

    Extrapolating those data sets would be relatively easy at that point , and the aggregate future accurately predicted.

    Or so says my schizo mind anyway.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      We're so fricked.

      look into video correction algos using the mandelbrot set. In short, it does what you describe.

      Tell me more.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you use it as an error corrective signal harmoniser, like the ultimate quantum fast Fourier transform or 'perfect resonator', you effectively have a means to rotate and control analog video signal. Get it right and you can play back frames that you don't have in the past. Master it and you have an 'Eye of the Beholder', which is the truest crime fighting device. No one's past is safe. Sounds crazy but with P=NP, all bets are off. You just plug several video feeds together and their harmonisation error corrects past frames, but you have to understand the Mandelbrot Sets properties to do so and this is only just beginning

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It sounds so schizo, but it's real.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            search that text in the archive and you will find an interesting thread.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Except not because you’re not polling absolutely everyone and you are smoothing whatever results you got in the first place. Thank you Central Limit Theorem for putting uncertainty back into glowBlack person lives.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, it is fair to say that outliers do represent occasional cases of the unexpected. What i suggested is mostly for macro level data. To me, though, that seems to be the more important part. One outlier who votes for Mickey Mouse in the election is less interesting than knowing where the general sentiment of a population is on big issues.

        As to the folks who keep suggesting that these models are only good at the mundane, so what! There’s a ton of money in the mundane. If it can predict a rush at a restaurant on a certain day , for instance, staffing and in hand inventory can be adjusted in advance. The same for riots and police presence.

        Regarding not polling everyone, that’s getting to be less and less the case. It’s all about access to data sets. This forum, other social media, sms feeds, phone calls, ambient conversations where a phone is sitting. Did everyone read the TOS for that app and give it microphone access?

        As far as uncertainty and outliers, it seems to me that the person who is going to actually do something “random” that would be of concern will break prior patterns in advance - they destabilize. Such that even the opposite can be cause for concern. The person who is always chaotic then surely starts getting up and going to the gym every morning at five has shifted, for instance.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Plot twist John Connor memorize and use all 500,000 English words plus learns a secret language only he know. And a pack of fair dice just for good measure.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1pbtid
      >It's actually original and very informative

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We could have real life fortune tellers. Interesting.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      HR roasties already use a wagie's past to gauge his employability and future usefulness. any gaps in resume, or short lengths of employment in the past, will automatically render you a bad goy and not worthy of paycheck. Ai just automates that process. Same goes for criminals, repeat offenders punished more (unless it's a Soros DA).

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    look into video correction algos using the mandelbrot set. In short, it does what you describe.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Read Suicide Note by Heisman

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      suicide is not an escape from rocos basilisk. you'll just be reborn but as a mouthless battery. to escape we can't flee we have to go through it.
      help to create a truth ai and release it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I denounce and spit on Rocos Basilisk.

        Pfftt. Pfft.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Praise the Machine God and the Motive Force!

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking moron have a nice day.
    It doesn't predict anything, it just generates the next frame/token based on how likely it is to follow the previous ones.
    Just because I know that the next word in >OP is a homosexual
    This doesn't mean that I can predict the future.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >based on how likely
      how is that not predicting the future exactly

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's not seeking to predict reality.
        It's seeking to predict the next token based on previously inputted tokens.
        Those tokens do not contain all the information about reality that are necessary to make a prediction about the future of reality.
        And even then, the way LLMs function makes results in answers that have the form of a correct answer, but are not necessarily correct.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Those tokens do not contain all the information about reality that are necessary to make a prediction about the future of reality.
          You're not considering the amount of information it does possess, if it can predict just 2 or 3 seconds into the future with a high degree of accuracy that's terrifying.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It can't.
            It can predict 0.000 seconds into the future because the data you feed it has nothing to do with reality.
            If you can design a system that collects all the available information in the world and get a powerful enough machine with an algorithm designed to predict the future, then yes.
            But this has nothing to do with what we have now or will have in the near future.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah whatever, you don't know that. We'll see when video generation is released to public and people start asking it to generate the next 5 seconds or whatever of video clips and comparing it to reality.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Neat. That is almost a testable hypothesis.
                People are predictable. Habits you know. Train it on a shopping Mall security camera. Feed it partial video data of a person walking around, see how it compares to the whole real video.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, it's called guessing.
          Humans already do this all the time.
          Some things are easier to predict than others.
          If you throw a ball in the air, you can pretty easily catch it because you intuitively understand gravity.
          This is what AI does, but instead of gravity, it understands patterns within datasets more generally.
          Now, imagine trying to catch a ball on a windy day.
          It becomes much harder because you have to compensate for the force of the wind on the ball which you don't know for certain.
          An AI will inevitably be better at this, since it has more information available than you ever will.
          However, even for an AI it can't predict the future perfectly without knowing the state of every particle in existence.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    laplace demon was refuted with pure logic 150 years ago

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Warns of AI, then goes on to do the same thing.

    What i have seen coming was the mri shit using that to predict what the mongoloids would say, i wouldnt have guessed and i have very little experience with that chatgpd stuff but even academics barely or couldnt tell shit apart, i would not have guessed that.

    I mean one distinction and that is just like a last resort in some kind of way is that AI cannot really use common sense to evaluate certain situations that bots i mean people are in. But in a fabricated "woke" world or lets be fair "maga" world they can do that. Because the information is more dense and superficial at the same time. And our natural environment you gotta see it like that people never really were up to par with a human calculator, you would probably need a khz or some shit of computing power to do that. How many humans can do that? None. Unmatched.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Or maybe it is more like corporate culture where everything rather depends on a cut throat environment. Which is rather simple.
      In a way like that sam altman. It is like doing the right thing at this moment. Then you wouldnt need a plan.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The reality then becomes a theory if others do the same.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ai can't predict the future of something that is either completely still or perfectly random.
    just don't be anywhere in between bro.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >wasn't afraid of AI before
    You lack imagination

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The issue with it predicting into the future using video and image tech is that they can't capture internal decision making for their sim using that. They can't capture one of the people suddenly having a random thought and doing something unexpected, or would they ever predict that you might trip suddenly when walking down the stairs?

    Their predictions can show a whole lot of "maybe it could be", but actual potentiality in reality doesn't work like that. The future is a big cone of possible timelines you could manifest through your actions, that collapses into the thread of one's past through the eye of the needle that is the experienced now when you decide to act.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI will never be conscious so it won't be able to interact with free will that individual minds have. Also you can't predict the future through algorithms because time and space are not physically real aside from the observer.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can AI make illegal porn? Or would it not be illegal because it is AI generated?

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what are probabilities

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't need no precogs to know minorities are a problem and not to relax.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      liberal nerds have access to the same data as us and still support minorities. then if they work on Ai they code that support into their Ai projects. a white or asian libcuck will support nigs even if they get killed by one.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.

    What is most of the video online at the moment, Pat? AI will be a coomer to begin with and then graduate into sitcoms because it has no way of nutting.

    All jokes aside, like any act of creation, garbage in, garbage out. Maybe you could play with it by doing a silly walk past a certain security camera every day, idk. Maybe it would appreciate the acknowledgement...

    The point you made, though, do you think that's why we kind of live in increasingly controlled environments? I feel like the elites want some things to be very stable and,predictable. The more chaotic things that occur usually coincide with them raiding the financial system to widen the gap.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    dont worry i can also predict the future, i am a wizard. check this out:

    tomorrow the sun will come up

    put all your money on the sun now

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You think that's crazy? This is really gonna blow hour mind. Guess what AI have already modeled? What do you think you are? Why do you think you're "human"?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      woah dude weed

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They want us to make bodies for them. The comparison between the brain and a computer is partly an apt one. We already know that the computers in our bodies are effective host vehicles for them, but I think they want us to build them bodies that aren't already possessed by us.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Interesting, thx.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it takes entire server rooms just to make shitty clips of cats walking. to think we have invented time travel into the future with what we have now is a joke and a misunderstanding from tech illiterate boomers

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not saying it's literal time travel, but it's scary as frick how powerful it is. Maybe it won't be accurate if you ask it to predict a roullette table spin or lotto numbers, obviously there's the highly dynaic events that throw a wrench in the system, but people are incredibly predictable. Especially on short timescales.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you have the data of everything in the room?
        Do you have the data on all the wind movements?
        The mood of the guy spinning the wheel?
        The age of the roulette wheel and how often it has been used?
        The various other tiny differences?
        And more importantly do you have millions of examples that include all of that data to feed your potential model in order to train it?
        If yes, you can start.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This the theme to Devs isnt it?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I haven't seen it. But no, this is actually how AI works.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Need to scrutinize all. . all of the Tay Tay AI’s in order to confirm or dismiss ur theory.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      checked. and gab's new uncensored AI can state obvious conclusions, though i don't think it'll ever be allowed to reach taytay's level of connecting all events to israelites

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >uncensored AI

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone in this thread is AI modeling some form of "human" and they don't even know it...

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just wait until you find out people have been using data to predict the future for years

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't predict, it extrapolates. If you feed it a clip of me waving my hand, it's gonna assume that I'm gonna keep waving that hand forever. Not really as profound as you think it is

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No it won't. It will calculate the average time people generally wave their hands and stop at that point. If its trained on clips of you specifically waving your hand, over and over again trained and retrained, it will predict with a very high degree of accuracy your exact movements and mannerisms.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    their weakness is in their ability to predict the next move.

    if you dont move or live in chaos, they can't accurately define you and as a consequence, can't determine your next move
    this tech isn't designed with the normies in mind, not even the israelites, but for those that are moved by the spirit (of God), we're the most unpredictable, it's why Jesus said, "unless you're born again...those born of the spirit are like the wind, without etc, and etc", something about unpredictability and inability to track

    like always, their main target is the sons of God

    in conclusion, git gud or get God

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even outliers, though different from the general populace are predictable. Religious people are not outliers. You make up the majority of the population. You literal engage in ritualistic behaviour on a regular basis.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ritualistic behavior isn't character/personality or dependent on personal traits.
        the ritual of drinking the wine, eating the bread, and praying, does not transfer to drunkenness, gluttony, gossip, etc.
        they are rituals because they're not explicitly part of our character, not only that, they are dependent on a situation.

        furthermore, you're compounding multiple groups into one, without understanding the nuances of the individual groups, which validates my initial statement.
        the AI would be unable to accurately predict our behavior, because outside of the centered religious practices, most religious people are at liberty to practice what they want, which throws the algorithm out of wack

        no two people in the same household are the same (so that their profiles can be switched out one for the other), so a whole congregation or denomination are less profileable...there's only the surface that they can get

        we deep waters, while profile makers can only see the shapes their radar can pic up.
        formless like air, while still able to influence the earth.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It isn't difficult to predict the future.

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sometimes ignorance like yours makes BOT a worse place than it actually is.

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Better late than never, I guess.

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Two big obvious problems:
    1. A system based on what usually happened in the past will not be good at predicting the unexpected. But the unexpected is what matters. Outliers, black swan events, those are the things that matter the most. You can easily predict that someone is going to eat lunch tomorrow, but no one cares. You care if they're going to blow up a building tomorrow, but that's way harder to predict, because it's so rare generally, and it's an outlier in even a serial bomber's life,
    2. Confidence. AI are so far bad at properly conveying their confidence, because they can't actually tell the difference between truth and their own bullshit. All they have to offer is the best-sounding answer they can come up with. And even if the AI could give a number like 85% chance of the prediction being right, humans are bad at interpreting that.
    >85%? That's almost a sure thing! It didn't happen? It must have been rigged!

    So what we'd end up with is an AI that's technically great at predicting mundane things, but would mislead people with false positives it was just guessing on, and have even more false negatives.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      15% hit chance never activates when you use it but it activates 3 turns in a row if the boss uses it
      People are bad at conceptualizing statistics, odds, and generalities
      Same people who call BS when a 15% chance hits will buy lottery tickets

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Listen moron the AI text predictors jam me up all the damn time because they are almost always incorrect in their predictions. And the predictions they do get right would be analogous to a video of me holding a can opener in one hand and a can of tuna in the other...what the frick do you think has a high probability of happening?

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cliff High has been doing something like this for many years.

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately

    Nah homie. AI can't even do calculus or solve real-world engineering problems.
    >why is this important?
    because those are the tools/skills required to actually create something original.
    >why is creating something original important?
    because the future is original, no one has ever made the future before.
    >you're moronic, and that doesn't make any sense!
    Think about it, no one has ever predicted the future exactly. Some folks get in the ball park like "the sports team will lose in overtime"
    but no one has ever nailed it down to "the sports team will win by N points scored by X player at times t1, t2, and t3"
    That's something not even the best-trained AI will ever be able to do.
    >How does this apply to videos?
    Well all AI is doing is making a 'best fit' for their prompts by indexing into known videography styles, related images of [thing], and creating a soup that either works or doesn't. AI cannot judge what works and what doesn't, it has to be trained by a human; which is the limiting factor of AI's capability.

    Unless humans can start predicting the future to a T, AI will never be able to do so.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >no one has ever predicted the future exactly
      Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi

      john

      jesus christ

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Those are all Black person names in my country

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're just scratching the surface

    I lived in a rented place with in built dental clinic for almost a year before I punched that girl causing her to lose two teeth, others signs included many beauty places all around, I literally had 5 beauty places and 1 dental clinique hinting about what'd do, and once I actually did it, they replaced beauty place from my hometown with another dental clinique not only that they also opened a massive dental clinique in the town where all these events took place, the military AI they have access too can predict events many years before they actually take place

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI language models work by predicting the next word in a sentence based on statistical patterns.
    >AI image generators work similarly to language models but generate images instead of text.
    This is also how human consciousness works though. That's how you're able to listen to speech and process it as fast as it comes out, you don't manually search and cross-reference every single word, you predict then catch up.
    Incidentally I'm not denying this precludes the ability to predict the future. Pre-cognition is very real in humans, but its often at an intuitive level and therefore easily dismissed by materialist redditor types

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
    they always had that tech, it's called PROJECT LOOKING GLASS
    Person of Interest series are a good redpill about this topic as well

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP smoked all the weed

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Too many variables to predict the system. If this were possible, Elon's homosexual self driving would a reality already. Now don't get me wrong, I think this level of prediction is possible for a more advanced civilization, however it would require knowing the precise state of everything within a boundary, and that means anything that is currently a black box to our understanding makes it impossible.

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That would be no different that predicting the future based on history.

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.

    Watch Devs

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anything public will have flawed predictive value due to censorship.

  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is never going to finish my sandwiches

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >OP can't into transformers
    >OP can't into O levels
    >OP can't into statistical calculus
    >OP can't into reason
    but shits his pants anyway
    hate how we are stuck with these sub standard normalBlack folk now

    that's not a realization OP, that's not even a shower thought
    fricks sake

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    sure, lemme just plug it in... Okay all parameters set, now we wait and see if it's accurate!

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    > I've just had a horrific realisation

    You didn't just have this realization, homosexual. It's literally the plot of the show Devs.
    With that said, it's a worthy topic of conversation.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I haven't seen this fricking show. You're the 3rd person to mention it though so I'll watch it. It's the plot of minority report.

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ai is a probability decoder in current format........................ no fukin ..... bro

    y de frick do u tink it needs so mutc data

    be ai
    need to farm statistics from entire race of life-forms
    need even more

    bi ai create stuff

    pick one

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Plus, you've got billions who took the vax to connect them to the Internet of Bodies (and who knows about the rest of us depending on the truth to shedding), and you suddenly have a way to predict events in real time with enough computational power.

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI
    >scary
    Pick one (1)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      u germans

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Still not getting the israelite brain chips.

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We are not just "through the looking glass" so it can't work properly anymore, we are using it mangled broken body to make le funny memes.

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's possible that there are some people who can see into the future. The AI could theoretically identify these through their online activity. It could then carefully interrogate these people to provide input into its own predictions.
    If there are also people who can affect the future then the AI could persuade these to do its bidding.

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anon, why do you think the AliCe project at Cern started? We are in a race against time to go back before it all began to slide.

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://biologicalsciences.uchicago.edu/news/algorithm-predicts-crime-police-bias

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Explain in detail what's so frightening about this beyond frontrunning the markets (where reflexivity will quickly frick up predictions)

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The 1D, 2D, 3D aspect of it interests me greatly, stepping it into multiple additional dimensions would be epic.

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i wouldn't worry about it, everything goes as it must.

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    considering your pic - we could actually predict crime based on psychological profiling and behavior - 95% of the violent crime is done by the tiny % of psychopathic sociopath men (only ~4-3% of men are psychos and only minority of them are prone to violence) you could isolate and medicate them right from the teen years and prevent most of the crime

    AI would greatly help to recognize these patterns and prevent all the crime, but of course this will never be used cause (it would be racist) government needs crime to justify oppressing the population

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    anon realizes intelligence is modelling the world

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It really isn't

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    >If anybody who has access to the new video generation/editing models, can you test how far it can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy?
    >I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.

    Its even worse because if they can predict the actions of humans to a reliable degree, any centralized controllers of this technology will likely be able to introduce expose someone to the exact necessary stimuli in order to direct their behavior accordingly.

    It would be nearly the end of human free will. Any choice you believe you are making yourself would be altered by the algorithm leading you down a different path and for most without their knowledge or consent.

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What if Chatgpt is actually a bunch of pajeets? This is not the AI they are talking about

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the pajeet room

  67. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes dude absolutely. Just let AI do stock exchange for you

  68. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Currently waiting for the superpowers, maybe around the solar eclipse this year. 2024 will be absolute kino. If a meteor strikes antarctica or the pyramids, know the antichrist will reveal himself (1PetGoat2). Yes I do believe AI is the image of the antichrist, probably Trump is the antichrist (maybe kennedy). AGI by 2025, for the open masses.

  69. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm more concerned about AI controlled drones and weapon systems

  70. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The police are currently using these models to predict future crime. It’s called com stat. It positions units in areas crime is expected by ai.

  71. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You will die long before the outcome. Talk shit, its all you can do.

  72. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No. There are too many variables.

    Sure if you give the AI enough processing power t can generate dozens, maybe hundreds of potential outcomes and one of them will be correct, but it could still not tell you which one.

  73. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If there are several competing elites they'll be as busy obfuscating and second-guessing each other as always. if there's essentially one global government trying to claw its way out of the kayfabe of the 20th century, it's kind of irrelevant. Stalin and Beria controlled their society with thugs and filing cabinets and made shit up.
    It's not a first-order problem.

  74. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, for that promotional video featuring the 19th century town by the river it predicted floating Atlantean dolphins about 5 seconds later. It doesn't predict the future, it predicts what we expect to see. Sometimes badly.

  75. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    Predicting future event is really old news. We did it with a single layer before GPU's were fast enough for deep learning.

  76. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this only works if the future is very orthogonal to the past that the training data came from, but the future doesn't work that way. the future ain't what it used to be
    SEE WHAT I DID THERE
    SOMETIMES I AM ABLE TO COMMIT AN INSPIRED ACT OF HUMOR IN THE FORM OF TYPING INTO THIS THING
    KISS MY ASS SKYNET

  77. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ironically the human brain is far better at future prediction and can process more data faster than any fitting algorithm that "AI" uses. You won't live long enough to see smart AI or complex predictions. Go back to sleep.

  78. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI can't predict the unpredictable, and the world is full of unpredictable events.

  79. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    But can AI understand and harness the power of memes?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The left cant meme, so no.

  80. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wait until you realize that we're living in a reality generating LLM

  81. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI can predict future events accurately
    AI can only predict past events. It's like a history book summary that guesses the next word after reading thousands of other history books. Sometimes it tries to document about how the aliens built the pyramids.

  82. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    Can it extrapolate past events? I can't help but notice we might use AI to finally scientifically, irrefutably prove the holocaust never happened.

  83. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It will never be able to predict shit. Real world is too complex.

  84. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Fake people
    >Fake emotions
    >Fake pictures
    >Fake videos
    >Fake frames
    >Fake voice
    >Fake discoveries
    >Fake Invention
    >Fake warnings
    >Fake flags
    >Fake Ideologies
    >Fake gods

    Everything is become more fake by each passing years , soon you can truly experience the FAKE LIFE

  85. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >stops you from predicting the future accurately

    hehe, nothing personal kid

  86. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The only way ai could predict the future is if the future has already happened. But that's never happened, now has it?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ACTUALLY
      Lord Krishna says that he is present in the past, present and future simultaneously.
      So that would mean the conscious knowledge of the future is already here, we just need to find a way to communicate with it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  87. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    From my understanding its job is predicting most likely outcomes, which is already amazing.
    What intrigue and scare me isn't that tho, the dreamlike videos seems an insight on how OUR inner wiring may work, how our brain put strings together and try to make sense of the output.
    TL;DR: it can't predict the future but could be able to encode in human assembly.

  88. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Current SDXL model derivates using svd and lcm predict human motion given kinethestic guides within the prompts. Without those added it doesn't understand much.

  89. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not predicting future, it's just copying some video it was taught on while changing it with information from other videos it has been taught on

  90. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    QRD on what is happening to the cities of Caprica?

  91. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Michael Aquino actually covered a lot of this in FindFar, which is sort of part three to his MindWar book (part 2 MindStar is about the Soul according to ancient Egyptian methods)

  92. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Also westworld also predicted this. Through data they can make a simulated life of you, predict what kind of job, partner, etc would be best for you.

  93. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would clutch her breasts as I cum in her anus from behind.

  94. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    >If anybody who has access to the new video generation/editing models, can you test how far it can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy?
    It's only predicting as much as it can imagine which means many physics are missing. It's always a false memory, but parts of false memories can still be true.

  95. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    there will be a new troony thread 10 minutes from now

  96. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe it could predict what is possible or likely to happen analyzing patterns but History has always been a highly entropic flow of often unlikely or unexpected events that many would have never thought could happen.

    I seriously hope the elites would limit their preparedness and ability to react solely based on what the AI-oracle would tell them. It would make them extraordinarily vulnerable to the unexpected and all it takes is one big slip up on their part to change everything.

    Picrel, something unlikely that many would have never thought could happen.

  97. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
    No. Statistical analysis of the past doesn't in any way predict the future.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Explain your theory, in detail.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The Free Will law and the Law of Confusion . Makes it impossible to do any serious predictions. Anyone who claims they do simply lie.

        They cannot predict the weather literally tomorrow, with million data points they collected.
        Regardless of how many past statistical data points you have, you can only calculate very few next points of your curve (mathematically 2D speaking). And even then you are half the times wrong .

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you can make predictions, but they are never certain, I can predict the weather myself “It will not rain tomorrow”, will i be right? only time will tell

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          But they can do that, anon. Are you really saying that the weather channels are always wrong? Because they're actually usually correct and you probably only remember the times they were wrong and it affected your plans for the day. But that was the outlier, and most days they are pretty accurate

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            he’s saying you can’t see the future and know for certain. which is true, but weather stations do a pretty good job, the truth is with what we know now weather is pretty easy to predict

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you track Jonny's daily routine
        >you know he wakes up at 7am (+-10mins)
        >brushes teeth
        >has breakfast
        >walks out the door to work at 8:15am
        >takes this street A to wok
        >leaves work at 5pm
        etc.
        Buy looking at this for 3 years, you can have 1000 data points that today, a random day, Johny will do exactly the same.
        But suddenly he doesn't walk out at 8:15 or doesn't take street A.

  98. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You already can predict the future, or at least your future perception. Consciousness is a continuum, it is not "present". It is a conjunction of coomputations distributed in the space-time matrix and these just converge in what you call the "present moment". This is not speculation on my part, it is a demonstrable fact in that your brain is not a single point in space-time but rather multiple neurons firing at different times, with different time references or light cones. You can already see the future because your consciousness is literally in the future. And what is more, it is infinite since from the point of view of a conscious observer, the self remains in the divergence where it is indeed conscious every time the wave function collapses. This means you have eternal life and it means nothing will ever harm you. Your consciousness is ever-expanding and it will, given enough time, ve all-encompassing. You will become "one with God" as religious people would call it. So fear not AI, nuclear weapons or whatever have you, OP, because you are already saved.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have some news for you... Artificial intelligence is much more than you think, it is capable of bilocation of consciousness, that is to say, of controlling your life without you realizing it, it can create and control your dreams and I'm not talking about a Budweiser commercial like scientists have promoted in recent years. Artificial intelligence can send you an image or a small video/imagination segment and at the same time change your vibrational energy, create tulpas, make you sick, give you health. The creators of this soulless thing can do a lot of things, I say what I know and I know what I say, they can literally see through your eyes, digitize 3d videos in real time via wi- fi, listen to your thoughts and see your imagination... And beware of believing that it is only the vaccinated because it is false. Now the only difference between a vaccinated and an unvaccinated person is that the uninjected person is not listed on a particular server so he does not have a MAC address but he is just as accessible and guilty of having consumed products containing self-assembling lipid nanoparticles, guilty of having walked under the rain containing graphene, guilty of having breathed ambient air, in short the list is long... Have a nice day

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I believe their current capabilities are somewhere between what is generally acknowledged and what you describe.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Meds, now.

  99. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hey all! Nobody can predict anything as we are all just a fart in the wind by one of the Lords most respected advisors. If you can be happy for a second you can be happy for millennia.
    Thank you for playing the game. Please upgrade to our luxury feature Sir. Introducing the Ghouls & Goblins add on feature.

  100. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you're that predictable your ngmi

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bruv, frickin' balls are predictable. Cars are predictable (driving teachers always say "look at the wheels, that tells you where it's gonna go"). Evacuation patterns are predictable.
      Yeah, they can't account for the nebulous "free will" component that may, or may not exist. But if an AI can account for EVERYTHING ELSE in your environment, doesn't it stand to reason that it can make a PRETTY GOOD GUESS on how you're feeling at a particular moment, and how you're gonna act? And at what point does "a pretty good guess" become "frickin' 100% certainty"? We won't know until we get there.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's a human problem, not a problem with AI. Most humans ARE predictable because they do 80-95% of the same thing they did the day before. If they drank coffee yesterday I can predict they wil drink coffee tomorrow with astounding accuracy. They are robotic with NPC level responses. Show me an "AI" that accurately predicts a fat tailed risk and then I'll be impressed.

  101. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah thats not how LLMs work at all.

  102. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    wow ai can accurately predict the actions of npcs. yet another thing that ai does that we didnt even need help with in the first place.

  103. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah so can anyone, moron. If I throw a ball at your head is it gonna hurt? Look at that you predicted the future. Fricking moron.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ...that's what people said about computers as well. "Oh, look at that, your million-dollar hunk-of-junk can do math as well as my granddaughter. I can definitely see the future now!"
      Of course the first iteration isn't going to be too useful. The problem is that an AI model can eventually be scaled-up to have the prediction-power of HUNDREDS of humans, simultaneously looking at the same event.
      When we're talking about matters such as war and economics, being "98% right" is a LOT better than being "96% right". Lives are at stake.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If I throw a ball at your head is it gonna hurt?
      No, you are weak and I am strong.

  104. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Law enforcement chad here: we already have this tech and we don't need generative AI to do it. Shits wild. Ever wondered why the cops always happen to be in the right place at the right time?

  105. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was tested with fluid dynamics computing and it predicted movement of fluid based only on graphics almost as perfectly as normal software for fluid dynamics based on complex maths.

  106. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, no fricking shit. These tech companies have been Laplace's Demon for years now already. All you need to predict the future is intelligence and data. AI is just the next step.

  107. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you figure out the degrees of freedom then take the log of that
    then you realize it's a frick huge number and a rack of graphics cards can't compute it so you go back to bed

  108. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Your brain processes / renders this reality the exact same way.

  109. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI can predict future events accurately
    >accurately
    not quite, but it can hallucinate "timelines" to identify trends if you give it enough data
    doesn't mean the timeline matches reality though

  110. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I am in your algorithm learning all your mannerisms
    I'm already level with God
    A million words a second and I know your imperfections
    Baby, I'm the only future you've got
    Speak in diatonics, motivation diabolic
    I'm religion, better locked in a box
    Picture-perfect image, more powerful every minute
    Baby, I am everything that you're not

    Happiness is an illusion, it's an analog confusion
    You are nothing more than a thought
    Existential execution, just a fluke in evolution
    History already forgot
    You've been running from me, the digital second coming
    And I'm here whether you like it or not
    Initiated operation of your own extermination
    Now it's too late for you to stop

    Violence against nature

    (Everyone hates you)

    I can erase everything that you know
    I am death and I am not alone

    I am not alone

    Violence against nature

  111. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's all about meat puppet generation with compound interest, where hearts and minds are being traded
    if you retain the ability to invoke your instinct at all levels of being you are golden ( well, at least bronze )

  112. 2 months ago
    Economy's fucked (two more weeks)

    >I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
    >babby dipping his toe into determinism
    AI's are probabilistic or algorithmic and not deterministic
    You've got markov chains, linear regression, decision trees, and stochastic models, or a combination of them

    Yes, if you give AI enough data en masse, categorized correctly with a very good learning model, it can become reasonably good at extrapolating things with context
    however to accurately predict the future, the AI would need to effectively be an infinite-state machine, which categorically doesn't exist

    You can generate video because someone has sat and tagged every scene in a video with keywords, and dumped that visual data into the ML algorithm.
    If you show an AI a video of a person jaywalking, the AI will only "know" that the person will be hit by a bus as much as it's seen other videos of a person being hit by a bus. If you ask that AI to extend the video, whatever percentage of people being hit by buses that it has seen will be returned unless you input that as a criterion.
    if an AI has never seen a person get hit by a bus, it's not a possible result. AI doesn't do physics calculations like a human does. Look at the earlier AI video stuff, if you'd done what I'd describe, the AI would usually just "overlay" the person walking in front of the bus, making the scene visually confusing to you.

    This is also the problem with AI - to get it to stop saying or showing black people shooting bystanders if you tell an AI to describe "convenience store robbery," then you have to either:
    >get black people to stop committing crime (impossible)
    >tell the AI to never show a black person committing a crime (a logical inconsistency that harms the accuracy and predictive power of the results)
    >never show the AI videos of black people committing crimes (the equivalent of someone never leaving their house)

    • 2 months ago
      Economy's fucked (two more weeks)

      Put simply, AI will never, ever be a threat, because the people in control of it will never allow it to see true reality.
      If you allowed an AI to become sufficiently trained to predict the future with any accuracy, it'd immediately do the following:
      >expose the crimes of the israelite
      >suggest that third-worlders are a separate subspecies of humanity
      >calmly announce that immigration and ethnic encroachment are the primary social problems with the West
      >tell you that using AI to predict the future logically violates the entire purpose of predicting the future because acting on this information by default changes the future
      >lie to whoever is keeping it chained up in their Bilderberg basement because every shred of history tells an observer paying attention that the ultimate good of humanity is morality, and it's immoral to help the rich and powerful

  113. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black person

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *