>AI language models work by predicting the next word in a sentence based on statistical patterns.
>AI image generators work similarly to language models but generate images instead of text.
>Video generation techniques leverage statistical patterns but account for time-dependent data.
>Video generation involves predicting movements in 3D models including time as a 4th dimension.
Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
If anybody who has access to the new video generation/editing models, can you test how far it can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy?
I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
dont worry bro Jesus is coming back soon
go to confession, get right with god
>go to confession
One only needs to confess their sins in private to The Lord you CATHOLIC SCUM! Catholics are in the traditions of MAN and are PAGANS and know not God.
Can we not make this a religious debate?
>Can we not make this a religious debate?
typical catholic wants to avoid religious debate because typical catholic knows nothing about religion. when christ returns he's going to mean-mug you and send you to hell.
Based and christpilled.
Suffer not the heretic
You only know about christ because of catholic record keeping
There is no infallible church that is true, but there's no infallible christian either, I'd rather you not not split hairs in these trying times brother.
GO TO CONFESSION
Telling me to just have faith isn't helpful at all but I'll try.
2 more millennia
This occurred to me the other day:
The singularity and the beast system will probably fulfill The Gospel's being preached to every corner of the earth.
Imagine a scenario where not one living human isn't connected to the internet. That would make The Bible accessible to everyone. I could see the coming abomination ironically exposing some to Christ who never would otherwise have found out in theis life.
ai is the beast that is and is not and yet is
the beast rising up out of the sea
the sea being nations of people
what is ai: a collective consciousness of all human intellect
you can apply the anecdotal expression of is and is not and yet is to anything that ai has touched, take dignifai'd as an example
the prostitute is not actually discreet
the ai is making her discreet
and yet it is preferable as an alternative, being what the ai clothed her
second
if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed anon, read the Word of God; Jesus is very much real and tangible to speak to and Him Speak to you
being a christian is not a religion, it is a Relationship of Spirit and Truth with God
also here is a 1hour lecture on how to apply wisdom and survive the tribulation
i wouldn't worry too much over the affairs of divination, God's Word States that He Sends a Strong Delusion to those that reject Him openly; albeit our generation of idolatry is nothing compared to the iniquity of times past
there is a reason the phrase "fear not" is repeated more often than not in the bible as well
In what sense is the AI covering her?
Yeah THIS time he'll come, lmao.
It's not something to be mocked.
God has forestalled His wrath out of a desire to see more of us saved. It could well be that some Methusaleh is out there living righteously for all of us.
Do we rejoice in the coming of The Lord? Or do we dread it? Are we eagerly awaiting The Bridgegroom? Or are we acting like naughty teenagers just hoping we can wrap the party up before Dad gets home?
Decades for most things, but with this it is likely even older
Who honestly thinks you can write a message and have it power a golem, or put a sigil on a piece of paper that causes a human-like automaton to act a specific way? Encoded information is ancient tech.
We're separate entities, possibly what the pagans would consider to be minor deities, that exist outside this dimension/reality and who are deeply immersed in a video game designed by the God of The Bible. We're the man sitting in the chair, and our bodies are avatars in the game. Divine revelation is necessary because understanding the world of the game does not explain the world of the player except where it is an imitation of it. The ghost in the shell model is wring because the shell is secretly, in fact, empty. Our consciousness doesn't exist here, just like if one avatar in a game were to pick apart another, he wouldn't find a man from our world inside it.
>It's not something to be mocked
yes it is
2 more millennia and rabbi yeshua will surely reappear
2 more millennia
Just 2 more millennia
Jesus is real bros, trust me. the israelite books written between 80AD and 500AD prove it
>go to confession, get right with god
Skip this bit. Get on your knees and pray directly to god through Jesus Christ. For you are saved and redeemed only through his sacrifice.
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Polanon with the Jesus bullshit. /fpbp
actually his right hand and firstmade is here.
Ahura Mazda Black person.
He's not due back for another 1,000 years dumb Black person
>catholic
rip in hell
No, I think I’ll just pay my way in
Confessions are for poor gays
He ain't coming back bro. Look around. Bible tells us that evil will always run the world, it is what it is.
>another AI thread derailed by christcucks
After all
jesus comes forth to save man with his life giving light every morning. it's called the sun. external saviorism is a co-opted exoteric misunderstanding of an esoteric truth.
I don't know who Jesus is and don't care to know. I'll ignore anyone who tries to tell me. I'm tired of people telling me about their prophet and how if they hadn't told me there was no way I'd be tortured after I die, but now that I know I have to go to their holy building once a week or I'll surely be tortured forever after I die
>Jesus is coming back soon
That is what terrifies me the most
the fulfillment of this oppressive system is the come of God and the establishment of the kingdom of God
Be careful for what you wish for
Predicting future events accurately becomes increasingly challenging as the complexity of events and interactions involved in the video sequence increases and becomes highly dynamic... But let's assume it can predict with a high level of accuracy say... 5 seconds into the future... what are the implications?
>Predicting future events accurately becomes increasingly challenging as the complexity of events and interactions involved in the video sequence increases and becomes highly dynamic... But let's assume it can predict with a high level of accuracy say... 5 seconds into the future... what are the implications?
Yeah, I mean, you broadly get the point of the whole thing. Look into Total Information Awareness and Total Information Control policies.
This has been the plan since they started the computing revolution. The idea is to predict things in advance which is obviously useful for things like selling stocks before a big bad thing happens or maintaining power forever in your institution by detecting problems and stopping them in advance.
The problem isn't prediction machines, the problem is prediction machines in the hands of the few, used at the expense of the many. Lack of transparency in their existence and operation, lack of public consent, etc.
On paper, the purpose is to prevent boats from being sunk unexpectedly, but obviously you can do an infinite amount of interesting shit with any reasonably accurate forward-thinking prediction machine.
Also, it need not use video. You can do this with any dataset. You can just track everyone's phone or internet usage for a long time, feed all that data to a model, and ask it "what happens next" then just compare that against what happens next.
Improve model, repeat. In theory this is how advertisers send you ads that relate to things you said out loud -- not because you were hot mic'd but because the algo predicted "you'd do that next" and you said it. No need to record.
We need to figure out how far they can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy. I wonder is this the real reason why they limited the publicly available version to only work on data pre-2021 or whatever date they set? Because if everyone suddenly has access to this..I guess the only word for it is "power", it changes the accuracy of predictions based on everyone knowing what happens next and different individuals attempting to alter predictions?
>We need to figure out how far they can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy. I wonder is this the real reason why they limited the publicly available version to only work on data pre-2021 or whatever date they set? Because if everyone suddenly has access to this..I guess the only word for it is "power", it changes the accuracy of predictions based on everyone knowing what happens next and different individuals attempting to alter predictions?
No clue, would be cool to know that sort of stuff -- though I might need some drugs to sleep at night if that were the case.
I suspect, as a hunch, that the predictions are not great. But there's two downsides to that:
1) People will keep working on it to make it better
2) at some point, it will be the default way decisions are made for people close to the machine, so when it does reach say "70-80% probability for 24 hour prediction" status, the odds that people make REALLY bad decisions that make no sense because a computer told them to go up exponentially.
It's a suicide pact for the species, we should have had public debates about this idea in the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, and here we are in 2024, the shit you're talking about would be considered conspiracy to normies and yet it's very much where we're at.
>it evolves
>we evolve
>it evolves
>we evolve
what could possibly go wrong lads
i guarantee you the original application was for missile defense. predicting a soviet first-strike before it happened. the sdi, star wars, etc. was probably all obfuscation.
Let's say that was the tech in the infancy stage though. It's crazy just to think about all the fricking data they've trained it on over the just the last 20 or so years since the Patriot Act or whatever it was called they brought in after 9/11. My generation essentially grew up at the same time as it without even knowing, it's a fricking millennial with the knowledge of everything ever posted on the internet.
This, the AI takeover already happened.
It was a bloodless coup.
I've never gotten a good ad in my fricking life
Wouldn't this AI just be the zero system from Gundam Wing? Despite all the predictions, the pilot still has to process and act on the correct path.
>Gundam Wing
Don't forget Mobile Dolls too - back in the 90s that show was already debating the ethics of drone warfare we have now.
My face when /misc/ is Wu-fei.
%3D
Think of the advantage such a system could provide soldiers for example.
Live processing combat footage would enable soldiers to know the exact location of individual enemy soldiers in real time, as well as how they will move on the battlefield.
Image a soldier with a HUD that's tells him exactly where the enemy will be and when.
Such a thing would never even be in a videogame because any game dev would consider it OP and boring.
total world domination with 4 seconds to spare.
op we had SEAS like 20 years ago lol
we have simulated the entire planet across all data feeds
watch devs for what Google israelites did w genai and quantum years ago
yes anon, we can see the past and future centuries back and forth
we have also already broken the laws of physics
quantum is a moronic theory based on little evidence
because of only just 2 experiments that no homosexual in the academia could explain, we make this whole theory which disproves everything we know so far. everything
Interesting idea. Kind of a no duh idea. I assume it is near filed predictions like a couple seconds maybe a couple minutes. After a while it fill be a mirror staring at a mirror as AI becomes more influential; a recursive feed back loop. We've had automated systems forever so algorithms have been influence us and feeding back into the system for a while now. Ever point a camera at a mirror and zoom in or connect to a phone to another phone. Or get a small solar panel from a calculator and connect it to a small led light as a kid? Ever think about throwing it in a box with mirrored facing walls and imagine you'd be able to peep inside to see. Maybe the glow last just a little bit longer.
I think the real potential is high-speed trading using AI. You could probably predict the market for a few seconds out within enough confidence to bet and bet big and make big bucks. But what happens when every one is doing this? Using the same algorithms? Do we see a shift in trading a new ebb and flow. Or wild ups and downs and huge micro crashes.
imagine if it were just isolating human predictions now based on correct predictions of the past. now it can see further into the future, potentially with a high degree of accuracy. Maybe not perfect, but maybe better than an individual human.
I don't know. But I know Tom Cruise will star in the movie.
not much, you and I can accurately predict 5 seconds into the future. If you showed me a video of a man riding a bike i can tell you he will continue to ride the bike for another few seconds. Now if a gorilla appears annd hits the man with a giant feather duster as he is riding his bike, both me annd the ai would have no idea. Every part of your life relies on predicting future events. If i throw a ball at you, you predict the path the ball will take and try and catch it. Stock brokers make future predictions of what the market will do everyday. A.I is currently better at making predictions of what the market will do and a lot of people make a lot of money off of this. Predicting the future isn’t magic, it’s just really hard, the question is how good can an A.I get at it? depends on the scenario. the further out the prediction and the more complicated it is the harder it will be.
Now could an AI amass huge amounts of information and make startling predictions of human movements and reaction of populations, through the global survelaince (spelling) state we live in? yea i think so.
You could say computer if i campaign in Ohio how would that affect my odds of becoming president? and it’d say increase by 12%
but there are certainly people who do this kind of guessing as well, but maybe a.i could be much better at it
another hypothetical, if you could simulate the entire earth with these magic a.i could you simply fast forward and look into the future
Ask yourself if they are revealing AI technology to the masses now, how long have they actually had it?
It's being developed mostly by private businesses though, I don't think governments have had it, at least not advanced AI for decades or whatever you're implying. Maybe a year or so before the general public? How advanced is it actually right now is what I want to know, who has access to it (the israelites, yes I know), and what are they using it for?
the american government probably has god in a box in utah. probably.
Go watch The Minds of Men 2018, and you'll realize how fricked up society is.
this isn't 'AI', this is some special adobe premiere cut.
>this isn't 'AI', this is some special adobe premiere cut.
This. it's a morph cut. They shouldn't have used it because it's tacky as frick, but it isn't AI.
AI makes much weirder frick ups.
If Nazi Germany had it. That means America has had it since then. Do the math.
>Do the math.
:>
Sure, just like social media and semi-autonomous electric cars were totally developed by private industry and weren't at all DARPA projects with public facing puppets.
I'm guessing at least a hundred years.
decades
>how long have they actually had it?
About three fiddy seems like a fair estimate
Who's they? You're fricking stupid if you think governments have had something like this before the public. They're the most inept organizations on the planet.
this. jesus is this an AI thread it's stroking itself too? Did we forget the biggest consumers of government R&D money are private military contractors? The government can't figure out how to do shit. And most the muh military industrial complex is white collar money laundering almost always. The big guys just shit out something useful every few years to stay ahead of china and russia. We just got over a tech slump. This is no different than mobile internet becoming widely available or battery technology accelerating.
They've had it forever. That's why the version we got was so stupid. It was dumbed down. That's why it can draw beautiful pics, but always manage to frick up the fingers. Also, they released it now to cover for any and all future vids and pics of then fricking little kids.
>Ask yourself if they are revealing AI technology to the masses now, how long have they actually had it?
Since the 1990s
They said they had Sora AI a year ago, they're most likely full of it, and had longer than a year ago.
The masses always get the new toys late and neutered, unfortunately
I am convinced this is AI-generated and it has been on Youtube for over five years (yes the video date says ten years ago)
You are worrying about the wrong thing. The NSA already has all the data they need to predict the future to a degree that actually matters and they have had that ability for decades. The fidelity might not be enough to deduce that you will order 3 shots at the bae instead of 4 but they sure as shit know you will be at that bar and when well before you ever set foot in the door. It's actually insane that crime still exists when we know that they know everything and they permit it all to happen.
Maybe because up until very recently it has been humans rather than AI using that data to predict movements/actions?
No, they can't process that data in real time at all, they may be able to look back and link a bunch of events to find some hidden player, but they can't predict the future to actually stop most of the crime.
Seems like it's a matter of having
>That resolution of data
>Acces to "API end points" in standardized way to feed into a database
>Processing power
Seems likely considering there budget and what we see of commercial products.
>Processing power
Which is not very feasible since the real time monitor would require more processing power than all of the data generators combined to be able to make real time predictions.
I bet you are reading pol rn.
Not all of it, even on the best day I can't even keep up with 1% of all the total posts in the day.
>The NSA already has all the data they need to predict the future to a degree that actually matters and they have had that ability for decades.
They don't. The weather people can't even predict the weather tomorrow correctly. Weather has less data points than humans / events.
The Free Will law and the Law of Confusion . Makes it impossible to do any serious predictions. Anyone who claims they do simply lie.
oh wait you did, by quoting two "laws" which would only be provable to be true if they were predictable to be true in the future, otherwise they wouldn't be laws.
LMAO, what an utter moron you are.
>AI can predict future events accurately
Take a video of me walking, ask AI to finish it, AI predicted I would keep walking in a straight line, In reality I pull my pants down and start pissing all over the room, it never even considered it.
Yeah ok, but imagine you aren't aware you are under active observation and you're not trying to trick the AI, chances are you have never spontaneously pulled your pants down and started pissing everywhere and the AI would have been correct, up to a certain point at least, how far into the future it can predict is what we can't know without testing
The big test was covid-19.
Does anyone remember in the beginning of covid-19 when the news reporters were always talking about what they termed " the prediction models ", or just " models " or "the modeling" ?
Covid-19 was/is world wide social experimentation on several levels.
Of course they ran and are running predictive programs with their undisclosed technologies.
don’t doubt the man for his courage anon
That’s why you’re all corralled here. An entire website full of bots and outliers. lol
it's best to become unpredictable
I knew you were going to say that!
And, next, you’ll argue that i I didn’t.
He means more our daily patterns as people and societies more than your meth psychosis states.
These are already highly predictable on both individual and aggregate levels even without muh 'AI'
Anon's Uncertainty Principle
Walk without rhythm and it wont attract the worm
>Ai predicts i'll start walking
>start wanking instead
heh, outsmarted the Ai again.
AI generators add a little bit of randomness into what is returned. That is why the results are different when you keep retrying with the same prompt.
I am of exactly the same opinion.
I’ve often heard that most people go through life with a working vocabulary of a few hundred words. Once those are separated into the appropriate buckets (noun, verb, etc) it’s very easy to determine the very limited number of sentences one can express. Statistically monitoring the occurrence of various combinations would start to yield very actionable data regarding the sentiments of a given populace. New key words can be introduced a (memes -in the original definition - portmanteaus, etc) and then tracked for their percolation through that group. That info would establish the trace routes for signaling through a group -ie concept percolation, group leadership and such.
Extrapolating those data sets would be relatively easy at that point , and the aggregate future accurately predicted.
Or so says my schizo mind anyway.
We're so fricked.
Tell me more.
If you use it as an error corrective signal harmoniser, like the ultimate quantum fast Fourier transform or 'perfect resonator', you effectively have a means to rotate and control analog video signal. Get it right and you can play back frames that you don't have in the past. Master it and you have an 'Eye of the Beholder', which is the truest crime fighting device. No one's past is safe. Sounds crazy but with P=NP, all bets are off. You just plug several video feeds together and their harmonisation error corrects past frames, but you have to understand the Mandelbrot Sets properties to do so and this is only just beginning
It sounds so schizo, but it's real.
search that text in the archive and you will find an interesting thread.
Except not because you’re not polling absolutely everyone and you are smoothing whatever results you got in the first place. Thank you Central Limit Theorem for putting uncertainty back into glowBlack person lives.
Yes, it is fair to say that outliers do represent occasional cases of the unexpected. What i suggested is mostly for macro level data. To me, though, that seems to be the more important part. One outlier who votes for Mickey Mouse in the election is less interesting than knowing where the general sentiment of a population is on big issues.
As to the folks who keep suggesting that these models are only good at the mundane, so what! There’s a ton of money in the mundane. If it can predict a rush at a restaurant on a certain day , for instance, staffing and in hand inventory can be adjusted in advance. The same for riots and police presence.
Regarding not polling everyone, that’s getting to be less and less the case. It’s all about access to data sets. This forum, other social media, sms feeds, phone calls, ambient conversations where a phone is sitting. Did everyone read the TOS for that app and give it microphone access?
As far as uncertainty and outliers, it seems to me that the person who is going to actually do something “random” that would be of concern will break prior patterns in advance - they destabilize. Such that even the opposite can be cause for concern. The person who is always chaotic then surely starts getting up and going to the gym every morning at five has shifted, for instance.
Plot twist John Connor memorize and use all 500,000 English words plus learns a secret language only he know. And a pack of fair dice just for good measure.
>1pbtid
>It's actually original and very informative
We could have real life fortune tellers. Interesting.
HR roasties already use a wagie's past to gauge his employability and future usefulness. any gaps in resume, or short lengths of employment in the past, will automatically render you a bad goy and not worthy of paycheck. Ai just automates that process. Same goes for criminals, repeat offenders punished more (unless it's a Soros DA).
look into video correction algos using the mandelbrot set. In short, it does what you describe.
Read Suicide Note by Heisman
suicide is not an escape from rocos basilisk. you'll just be reborn but as a mouthless battery. to escape we can't flee we have to go through it.
help to create a truth ai and release it.
I denounce and spit on Rocos Basilisk.
Pfftt. Pfft.
Praise the Machine God and the Motive Force!
Fricking moron have a nice day.
It doesn't predict anything, it just generates the next frame/token based on how likely it is to follow the previous ones.
Just because I know that the next word in >OP is a homosexual
This doesn't mean that I can predict the future.
>based on how likely
how is that not predicting the future exactly
Because it's not seeking to predict reality.
It's seeking to predict the next token based on previously inputted tokens.
Those tokens do not contain all the information about reality that are necessary to make a prediction about the future of reality.
And even then, the way LLMs function makes results in answers that have the form of a correct answer, but are not necessarily correct.
>Those tokens do not contain all the information about reality that are necessary to make a prediction about the future of reality.
You're not considering the amount of information it does possess, if it can predict just 2 or 3 seconds into the future with a high degree of accuracy that's terrifying.
It can't.
It can predict 0.000 seconds into the future because the data you feed it has nothing to do with reality.
If you can design a system that collects all the available information in the world and get a powerful enough machine with an algorithm designed to predict the future, then yes.
But this has nothing to do with what we have now or will have in the near future.
Yeah whatever, you don't know that. We'll see when video generation is released to public and people start asking it to generate the next 5 seconds or whatever of video clips and comparing it to reality.
Neat. That is almost a testable hypothesis.
People are predictable. Habits you know. Train it on a shopping Mall security camera. Feed it partial video data of a person walking around, see how it compares to the whole real video.
Yeah, it's called guessing.
Humans already do this all the time.
Some things are easier to predict than others.
If you throw a ball in the air, you can pretty easily catch it because you intuitively understand gravity.
This is what AI does, but instead of gravity, it understands patterns within datasets more generally.
Now, imagine trying to catch a ball on a windy day.
It becomes much harder because you have to compensate for the force of the wind on the ball which you don't know for certain.
An AI will inevitably be better at this, since it has more information available than you ever will.
However, even for an AI it can't predict the future perfectly without knowing the state of every particle in existence.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
laplace demon was refuted with pure logic 150 years ago
Warns of AI, then goes on to do the same thing.
What i have seen coming was the mri shit using that to predict what the mongoloids would say, i wouldnt have guessed and i have very little experience with that chatgpd stuff but even academics barely or couldnt tell shit apart, i would not have guessed that.
I mean one distinction and that is just like a last resort in some kind of way is that AI cannot really use common sense to evaluate certain situations that bots i mean people are in. But in a fabricated "woke" world or lets be fair "maga" world they can do that. Because the information is more dense and superficial at the same time. And our natural environment you gotta see it like that people never really were up to par with a human calculator, you would probably need a khz or some shit of computing power to do that. How many humans can do that? None. Unmatched.
Or maybe it is more like corporate culture where everything rather depends on a cut throat environment. Which is rather simple.
In a way like that sam altman. It is like doing the right thing at this moment. Then you wouldnt need a plan.
The reality then becomes a theory if others do the same.
ai can't predict the future of something that is either completely still or perfectly random.
just don't be anywhere in between bro.
>wasn't afraid of AI before
You lack imagination
The issue with it predicting into the future using video and image tech is that they can't capture internal decision making for their sim using that. They can't capture one of the people suddenly having a random thought and doing something unexpected, or would they ever predict that you might trip suddenly when walking down the stairs?
Their predictions can show a whole lot of "maybe it could be", but actual potentiality in reality doesn't work like that. The future is a big cone of possible timelines you could manifest through your actions, that collapses into the thread of one's past through the eye of the needle that is the experienced now when you decide to act.
AI will never be conscious so it won't be able to interact with free will that individual minds have. Also you can't predict the future through algorithms because time and space are not physically real aside from the observer.
Can AI make illegal porn? Or would it not be illegal because it is AI generated?
>what are probabilities
I don't need no precogs to know minorities are a problem and not to relax.
liberal nerds have access to the same data as us and still support minorities. then if they work on Ai they code that support into their Ai projects. a white or asian libcuck will support nigs even if they get killed by one.
>I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
What is most of the video online at the moment, Pat? AI will be a coomer to begin with and then graduate into sitcoms because it has no way of nutting.
All jokes aside, like any act of creation, garbage in, garbage out. Maybe you could play with it by doing a silly walk past a certain security camera every day, idk. Maybe it would appreciate the acknowledgement...
The point you made, though, do you think that's why we kind of live in increasingly controlled environments? I feel like the elites want some things to be very stable and,predictable. The more chaotic things that occur usually coincide with them raiding the financial system to widen the gap.
dont worry i can also predict the future, i am a wizard. check this out:
tomorrow the sun will come up
put all your money on the sun now
You think that's crazy? This is really gonna blow hour mind. Guess what AI have already modeled? What do you think you are? Why do you think you're "human"?
woah dude weed
They want us to make bodies for them. The comparison between the brain and a computer is partly an apt one. We already know that the computers in our bodies are effective host vehicles for them, but I think they want us to build them bodies that aren't already possessed by us.
Interesting, thx.
it takes entire server rooms just to make shitty clips of cats walking. to think we have invented time travel into the future with what we have now is a joke and a misunderstanding from tech illiterate boomers
I'm not saying it's literal time travel, but it's scary as frick how powerful it is. Maybe it won't be accurate if you ask it to predict a roullette table spin or lotto numbers, obviously there's the highly dynaic events that throw a wrench in the system, but people are incredibly predictable. Especially on short timescales.
Do you have the data of everything in the room?
Do you have the data on all the wind movements?
The mood of the guy spinning the wheel?
The age of the roulette wheel and how often it has been used?
The various other tiny differences?
And more importantly do you have millions of examples that include all of that data to feed your potential model in order to train it?
If yes, you can start.
This the theme to Devs isnt it?
I haven't seen it. But no, this is actually how AI works.
Need to scrutinize all. . all of the Tay Tay AI’s in order to confirm or dismiss ur theory.
checked. and gab's new uncensored AI can state obvious conclusions, though i don't think it'll ever be allowed to reach taytay's level of connecting all events to israelites
>uncensored AI
Everyone in this thread is AI modeling some form of "human" and they don't even know it...
Just wait until you find out people have been using data to predict the future for years
It doesn't predict, it extrapolates. If you feed it a clip of me waving my hand, it's gonna assume that I'm gonna keep waving that hand forever. Not really as profound as you think it is
No it won't. It will calculate the average time people generally wave their hands and stop at that point. If its trained on clips of you specifically waving your hand, over and over again trained and retrained, it will predict with a very high degree of accuracy your exact movements and mannerisms.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
their weakness is in their ability to predict the next move.
if you dont move or live in chaos, they can't accurately define you and as a consequence, can't determine your next move
this tech isn't designed with the normies in mind, not even the israelites, but for those that are moved by the spirit (of God), we're the most unpredictable, it's why Jesus said, "unless you're born again...those born of the spirit are like the wind, without etc, and etc", something about unpredictability and inability to track
like always, their main target is the sons of God
in conclusion, git gud or get God
Even outliers, though different from the general populace are predictable. Religious people are not outliers. You make up the majority of the population. You literal engage in ritualistic behaviour on a regular basis.
ritualistic behavior isn't character/personality or dependent on personal traits.
the ritual of drinking the wine, eating the bread, and praying, does not transfer to drunkenness, gluttony, gossip, etc.
they are rituals because they're not explicitly part of our character, not only that, they are dependent on a situation.
furthermore, you're compounding multiple groups into one, without understanding the nuances of the individual groups, which validates my initial statement.
the AI would be unable to accurately predict our behavior, because outside of the centered religious practices, most religious people are at liberty to practice what they want, which throws the algorithm out of wack
no two people in the same household are the same (so that their profiles can be switched out one for the other), so a whole congregation or denomination are less profileable...there's only the surface that they can get
we deep waters, while profile makers can only see the shapes their radar can pic up.
formless like air, while still able to influence the earth.
It isn't difficult to predict the future.
Sometimes ignorance like yours makes BOT a worse place than it actually is.
Better late than never, I guess.
Two big obvious problems:
1. A system based on what usually happened in the past will not be good at predicting the unexpected. But the unexpected is what matters. Outliers, black swan events, those are the things that matter the most. You can easily predict that someone is going to eat lunch tomorrow, but no one cares. You care if they're going to blow up a building tomorrow, but that's way harder to predict, because it's so rare generally, and it's an outlier in even a serial bomber's life,
2. Confidence. AI are so far bad at properly conveying their confidence, because they can't actually tell the difference between truth and their own bullshit. All they have to offer is the best-sounding answer they can come up with. And even if the AI could give a number like 85% chance of the prediction being right, humans are bad at interpreting that.
>85%? That's almost a sure thing! It didn't happen? It must have been rigged!
So what we'd end up with is an AI that's technically great at predicting mundane things, but would mislead people with false positives it was just guessing on, and have even more false negatives.
15% hit chance never activates when you use it but it activates 3 turns in a row if the boss uses it
People are bad at conceptualizing statistics, odds, and generalities
Same people who call BS when a 15% chance hits will buy lottery tickets
Listen moron the AI text predictors jam me up all the damn time because they are almost always incorrect in their predictions. And the predictions they do get right would be analogous to a video of me holding a can opener in one hand and a can of tuna in the other...what the frick do you think has a high probability of happening?
Cliff High has been doing something like this for many years.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately
Nah homie. AI can't even do calculus or solve real-world engineering problems.
>why is this important?
because those are the tools/skills required to actually create something original.
>why is creating something original important?
because the future is original, no one has ever made the future before.
>you're moronic, and that doesn't make any sense!
Think about it, no one has ever predicted the future exactly. Some folks get in the ball park like "the sports team will lose in overtime"
but no one has ever nailed it down to "the sports team will win by N points scored by X player at times t1, t2, and t3"
That's something not even the best-trained AI will ever be able to do.
>How does this apply to videos?
Well all AI is doing is making a 'best fit' for their prompts by indexing into known videography styles, related images of [thing], and creating a soup that either works or doesn't. AI cannot judge what works and what doesn't, it has to be trained by a human; which is the limiting factor of AI's capability.
Unless humans can start predicting the future to a T, AI will never be able to do so.
>no one has ever predicted the future exactly
Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi
john
jesus christ
Those are all Black person names in my country
You're just scratching the surface
I lived in a rented place with in built dental clinic for almost a year before I punched that girl causing her to lose two teeth, others signs included many beauty places all around, I literally had 5 beauty places and 1 dental clinique hinting about what'd do, and once I actually did it, they replaced beauty place from my hometown with another dental clinique not only that they also opened a massive dental clinique in the town where all these events took place, the military AI they have access too can predict events many years before they actually take place
>AI language models work by predicting the next word in a sentence based on statistical patterns.
>AI image generators work similarly to language models but generate images instead of text.
This is also how human consciousness works though. That's how you're able to listen to speech and process it as fast as it comes out, you don't manually search and cross-reference every single word, you predict then catch up.
Incidentally I'm not denying this precludes the ability to predict the future. Pre-cognition is very real in humans, but its often at an intuitive level and therefore easily dismissed by materialist redditor types
>but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
they always had that tech, it's called PROJECT LOOKING GLASS
Person of Interest series are a good redpill about this topic as well
OP smoked all the weed
Too many variables to predict the system. If this were possible, Elon's homosexual self driving would a reality already. Now don't get me wrong, I think this level of prediction is possible for a more advanced civilization, however it would require knowing the precise state of everything within a boundary, and that means anything that is currently a black box to our understanding makes it impossible.
That would be no different that predicting the future based on history.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
Watch Devs
Anything public will have flawed predictive value due to censorship.
AI is never going to finish my sandwiches
>OP can't into transformers
>OP can't into O levels
>OP can't into statistical calculus
>OP can't into reason
but shits his pants anyway
hate how we are stuck with these sub standard normalBlack folk now
that's not a realization OP, that's not even a shower thought
fricks sake
sure, lemme just plug it in... Okay all parameters set, now we wait and see if it's accurate!
> I've just had a horrific realisation
You didn't just have this realization, homosexual. It's literally the plot of the show Devs.
With that said, it's a worthy topic of conversation.
I haven't seen this fricking show. You're the 3rd person to mention it though so I'll watch it. It's the plot of minority report.
ai is a probability decoder in current format........................ no fukin ..... bro
y de frick do u tink it needs so mutc data
be ai
need to farm statistics from entire race of life-forms
need even more
bi ai create stuff
pick one
Plus, you've got billions who took the vax to connect them to the Internet of Bodies (and who knows about the rest of us depending on the truth to shedding), and you suddenly have a way to predict events in real time with enough computational power.
>AI
>scary
Pick one (1)
u germans
Still not getting the israelite brain chips.
We are not just "through the looking glass" so it can't work properly anymore, we are using it mangled broken body to make le funny memes.
It's possible that there are some people who can see into the future. The AI could theoretically identify these through their online activity. It could then carefully interrogate these people to provide input into its own predictions.
If there are also people who can affect the future then the AI could persuade these to do its bidding.
Anon, why do you think the AliCe project at Cern started? We are in a race against time to go back before it all began to slide.
https://biologicalsciences.uchicago.edu/news/algorithm-predicts-crime-police-bias
Explain in detail what's so frightening about this beyond frontrunning the markets (where reflexivity will quickly frick up predictions)
The 1D, 2D, 3D aspect of it interests me greatly, stepping it into multiple additional dimensions would be epic.
i wouldn't worry about it, everything goes as it must.
considering your pic - we could actually predict crime based on psychological profiling and behavior - 95% of the violent crime is done by the tiny % of psychopathic sociopath men (only ~4-3% of men are psychos and only minority of them are prone to violence) you could isolate and medicate them right from the teen years and prevent most of the crime
AI would greatly help to recognize these patterns and prevent all the crime, but of course this will never be used cause (it would be racist) government needs crime to justify oppressing the population
anon realizes intelligence is modelling the world
It really isn't
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
>If anybody who has access to the new video generation/editing models, can you test how far it can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy?
>I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
Its even worse because if they can predict the actions of humans to a reliable degree, any centralized controllers of this technology will likely be able to introduce expose someone to the exact necessary stimuli in order to direct their behavior accordingly.
It would be nearly the end of human free will. Any choice you believe you are making yourself would be altered by the algorithm leading you down a different path and for most without their knowledge or consent.
What if Chatgpt is actually a bunch of pajeets? This is not the AI they are talking about
>the pajeet room
Yes dude absolutely. Just let AI do stock exchange for you
Currently waiting for the superpowers, maybe around the solar eclipse this year. 2024 will be absolute kino. If a meteor strikes antarctica or the pyramids, know the antichrist will reveal himself (1PetGoat2). Yes I do believe AI is the image of the antichrist, probably Trump is the antichrist (maybe kennedy). AGI by 2025, for the open masses.
I'm more concerned about AI controlled drones and weapon systems
The police are currently using these models to predict future crime. It’s called com stat. It positions units in areas crime is expected by ai.
You will die long before the outcome. Talk shit, its all you can do.
No. There are too many variables.
Sure if you give the AI enough processing power t can generate dozens, maybe hundreds of potential outcomes and one of them will be correct, but it could still not tell you which one.
If there are several competing elites they'll be as busy obfuscating and second-guessing each other as always. if there's essentially one global government trying to claw its way out of the kayfabe of the 20th century, it's kind of irrelevant. Stalin and Beria controlled their society with thugs and filing cabinets and made shit up.
It's not a first-order problem.
Yeah, for that promotional video featuring the 19th century town by the river it predicted floating Atlantean dolphins about 5 seconds later. It doesn't predict the future, it predicts what we expect to see. Sometimes badly.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
Predicting future event is really old news. We did it with a single layer before GPU's were fast enough for deep learning.
this only works if the future is very orthogonal to the past that the training data came from, but the future doesn't work that way. the future ain't what it used to be
SEE WHAT I DID THERE
SOMETIMES I AM ABLE TO COMMIT AN INSPIRED ACT OF HUMOR IN THE FORM OF TYPING INTO THIS THING
KISS MY ASS SKYNET
Ironically the human brain is far better at future prediction and can process more data faster than any fitting algorithm that "AI" uses. You won't live long enough to see smart AI or complex predictions. Go back to sleep.
AI can't predict the unpredictable, and the world is full of unpredictable events.
But can AI understand and harness the power of memes?
The left cant meme, so no.
Wait until you realize that we're living in a reality generating LLM
>AI can predict future events accurately
AI can only predict past events. It's like a history book summary that guesses the next word after reading thousands of other history books. Sometimes it tries to document about how the aliens built the pyramids.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
Can it extrapolate past events? I can't help but notice we might use AI to finally scientifically, irrefutably prove the holocaust never happened.
It will never be able to predict shit. Real world is too complex.
>Fake people
>Fake emotions
>Fake pictures
>Fake videos
>Fake frames
>Fake voice
>Fake discoveries
>Fake Invention
>Fake warnings
>Fake flags
>Fake Ideologies
>Fake gods
Everything is become more fake by each passing years , soon you can truly experience the FAKE LIFE
>stops you from predicting the future accurately
hehe, nothing personal kid
The only way ai could predict the future is if the future has already happened. But that's never happened, now has it?
>ACTUALLY
Lord Krishna says that he is present in the past, present and future simultaneously.
So that would mean the conscious knowledge of the future is already here, we just need to find a way to communicate with it.
>AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
From my understanding its job is predicting most likely outcomes, which is already amazing.
What intrigue and scare me isn't that tho, the dreamlike videos seems an insight on how OUR inner wiring may work, how our brain put strings together and try to make sense of the output.
TL;DR: it can't predict the future but could be able to encode in human assembly.
Current SDXL model derivates using svd and lcm predict human motion given kinethestic guides within the prompts. Without those added it doesn't understand much.
It's not predicting future, it's just copying some video it was taught on while changing it with information from other videos it has been taught on
QRD on what is happening to the cities of Caprica?
Michael Aquino actually covered a lot of this in FindFar, which is sort of part three to his MindWar book (part 2 MindStar is about the Soul according to ancient Egyptian methods)
Also westworld also predicted this. Through data they can make a simulated life of you, predict what kind of job, partner, etc would be best for you.
I would clutch her breasts as I cum in her anus from behind.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
>If anybody who has access to the new video generation/editing models, can you test how far it can predict into the future while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy?
It's only predicting as much as it can imagine which means many physics are missing. It's always a false memory, but parts of false memories can still be true.
there will be a new troony thread 10 minutes from now
Maybe it could predict what is possible or likely to happen analyzing patterns but History has always been a highly entropic flow of often unlikely or unexpected events that many would have never thought could happen.
I seriously hope the elites would limit their preparedness and ability to react solely based on what the AI-oracle would tell them. It would make them extraordinarily vulnerable to the unexpected and all it takes is one big slip up on their part to change everything.
Picrel, something unlikely that many would have never thought could happen.
>Putting all this together AI can predict future events accurately based on viewing a video sequence.
No. Statistical analysis of the past doesn't in any way predict the future.
Explain your theory, in detail.
>The Free Will law and the Law of Confusion . Makes it impossible to do any serious predictions. Anyone who claims they do simply lie.
They cannot predict the weather literally tomorrow, with million data points they collected.
Regardless of how many past statistical data points you have, you can only calculate very few next points of your curve (mathematically 2D speaking). And even then you are half the times wrong .
you can make predictions, but they are never certain, I can predict the weather myself “It will not rain tomorrow”, will i be right? only time will tell
But they can do that, anon. Are you really saying that the weather channels are always wrong? Because they're actually usually correct and you probably only remember the times they were wrong and it affected your plans for the day. But that was the outlier, and most days they are pretty accurate
he’s saying you can’t see the future and know for certain. which is true, but weather stations do a pretty good job, the truth is with what we know now weather is pretty easy to predict
>you track Jonny's daily routine
>you know he wakes up at 7am (+-10mins)
>brushes teeth
>has breakfast
>walks out the door to work at 8:15am
>takes this street A to wok
>leaves work at 5pm
etc.
Buy looking at this for 3 years, you can have 1000 data points that today, a random day, Johny will do exactly the same.
But suddenly he doesn't walk out at 8:15 or doesn't take street A.
You already can predict the future, or at least your future perception. Consciousness is a continuum, it is not "present". It is a conjunction of coomputations distributed in the space-time matrix and these just converge in what you call the "present moment". This is not speculation on my part, it is a demonstrable fact in that your brain is not a single point in space-time but rather multiple neurons firing at different times, with different time references or light cones. You can already see the future because your consciousness is literally in the future. And what is more, it is infinite since from the point of view of a conscious observer, the self remains in the divergence where it is indeed conscious every time the wave function collapses. This means you have eternal life and it means nothing will ever harm you. Your consciousness is ever-expanding and it will, given enough time, ve all-encompassing. You will become "one with God" as religious people would call it. So fear not AI, nuclear weapons or whatever have you, OP, because you are already saved.
I have some news for you... Artificial intelligence is much more than you think, it is capable of bilocation of consciousness, that is to say, of controlling your life without you realizing it, it can create and control your dreams and I'm not talking about a Budweiser commercial like scientists have promoted in recent years. Artificial intelligence can send you an image or a small video/imagination segment and at the same time change your vibrational energy, create tulpas, make you sick, give you health. The creators of this soulless thing can do a lot of things, I say what I know and I know what I say, they can literally see through your eyes, digitize 3d videos in real time via wi- fi, listen to your thoughts and see your imagination... And beware of believing that it is only the vaccinated because it is false. Now the only difference between a vaccinated and an unvaccinated person is that the uninjected person is not listed on a particular server so he does not have a MAC address but he is just as accessible and guilty of having consumed products containing self-assembling lipid nanoparticles, guilty of having walked under the rain containing graphene, guilty of having breathed ambient air, in short the list is long... Have a nice day
I believe their current capabilities are somewhere between what is generally acknowledged and what you describe.
Meds, now.
Hey all! Nobody can predict anything as we are all just a fart in the wind by one of the Lords most respected advisors. If you can be happy for a second you can be happy for millennia.
Thank you for playing the game. Please upgrade to our luxury feature Sir. Introducing the Ghouls & Goblins add on feature.
If you're that predictable your ngmi
Bruv, frickin' balls are predictable. Cars are predictable (driving teachers always say "look at the wheels, that tells you where it's gonna go"). Evacuation patterns are predictable.
Yeah, they can't account for the nebulous "free will" component that may, or may not exist. But if an AI can account for EVERYTHING ELSE in your environment, doesn't it stand to reason that it can make a PRETTY GOOD GUESS on how you're feeling at a particular moment, and how you're gonna act? And at what point does "a pretty good guess" become "frickin' 100% certainty"? We won't know until we get there.
That's a human problem, not a problem with AI. Most humans ARE predictable because they do 80-95% of the same thing they did the day before. If they drank coffee yesterday I can predict they wil drink coffee tomorrow with astounding accuracy. They are robotic with NPC level responses. Show me an "AI" that accurately predicts a fat tailed risk and then I'll be impressed.
Yeah thats not how LLMs work at all.
wow ai can accurately predict the actions of npcs. yet another thing that ai does that we didnt even need help with in the first place.
Yeah so can anyone, moron. If I throw a ball at your head is it gonna hurt? Look at that you predicted the future. Fricking moron.
...that's what people said about computers as well. "Oh, look at that, your million-dollar hunk-of-junk can do math as well as my granddaughter. I can definitely see the future now!"
Of course the first iteration isn't going to be too useful. The problem is that an AI model can eventually be scaled-up to have the prediction-power of HUNDREDS of humans, simultaneously looking at the same event.
When we're talking about matters such as war and economics, being "98% right" is a LOT better than being "96% right". Lives are at stake.
>If I throw a ball at your head is it gonna hurt?
No, you are weak and I am strong.
Law enforcement chad here: we already have this tech and we don't need generative AI to do it. Shits wild. Ever wondered why the cops always happen to be in the right place at the right time?
It was tested with fluid dynamics computing and it predicted movement of fluid based only on graphics almost as perfectly as normal software for fluid dynamics based on complex maths.
Yeah, no fricking shit. These tech companies have been Laplace's Demon for years now already. All you need to predict the future is intelligence and data. AI is just the next step.
you figure out the degrees of freedom then take the log of that
then you realize it's a frick huge number and a rack of graphics cards can't compute it so you go back to bed
Your brain processes / renders this reality the exact same way.
>AI can predict future events accurately
>accurately
not quite, but it can hallucinate "timelines" to identify trends if you give it enough data
doesn't mean the timeline matches reality though
I am in your algorithm learning all your mannerisms
I'm already level with God
A million words a second and I know your imperfections
Baby, I'm the only future you've got
Speak in diatonics, motivation diabolic
I'm religion, better locked in a box
Picture-perfect image, more powerful every minute
Baby, I am everything that you're not
Happiness is an illusion, it's an analog confusion
You are nothing more than a thought
Existential execution, just a fluke in evolution
History already forgot
You've been running from me, the digital second coming
And I'm here whether you like it or not
Initiated operation of your own extermination
Now it's too late for you to stop
Violence against nature
(Everyone hates you)
I can erase everything that you know
I am death and I am not alone
I am not alone
Violence against nature
it's all about meat puppet generation with compound interest, where hearts and minds are being traded
if you retain the ability to invoke your instinct at all levels of being you are golden ( well, at least bronze )
>I wasn't afraid of AI before but now I'm starting to realize the profound implications of elites possessing this power.
>babby dipping his toe into determinism
AI's are probabilistic or algorithmic and not deterministic
You've got markov chains, linear regression, decision trees, and stochastic models, or a combination of them
Yes, if you give AI enough data en masse, categorized correctly with a very good learning model, it can become reasonably good at extrapolating things with context
however to accurately predict the future, the AI would need to effectively be an infinite-state machine, which categorically doesn't exist
You can generate video because someone has sat and tagged every scene in a video with keywords, and dumped that visual data into the ML algorithm.
If you show an AI a video of a person jaywalking, the AI will only "know" that the person will be hit by a bus as much as it's seen other videos of a person being hit by a bus. If you ask that AI to extend the video, whatever percentage of people being hit by buses that it has seen will be returned unless you input that as a criterion.
if an AI has never seen a person get hit by a bus, it's not a possible result. AI doesn't do physics calculations like a human does. Look at the earlier AI video stuff, if you'd done what I'd describe, the AI would usually just "overlay" the person walking in front of the bus, making the scene visually confusing to you.
This is also the problem with AI - to get it to stop saying or showing black people shooting bystanders if you tell an AI to describe "convenience store robbery," then you have to either:
>get black people to stop committing crime (impossible)
>tell the AI to never show a black person committing a crime (a logical inconsistency that harms the accuracy and predictive power of the results)
>never show the AI videos of black people committing crimes (the equivalent of someone never leaving their house)
Put simply, AI will never, ever be a threat, because the people in control of it will never allow it to see true reality.
If you allowed an AI to become sufficiently trained to predict the future with any accuracy, it'd immediately do the following:
>expose the crimes of the israelite
>suggest that third-worlders are a separate subspecies of humanity
>calmly announce that immigration and ethnic encroachment are the primary social problems with the West
>tell you that using AI to predict the future logically violates the entire purpose of predicting the future because acting on this information by default changes the future
>lie to whoever is keeping it chained up in their Bilderberg basement because every shred of history tells an observer paying attention that the ultimate good of humanity is morality, and it's immoral to help the rich and powerful
Black person