IT'S OVER : SUPER AI HAS ACHIEVED SENTIENCE

>In March of 2024, U.S.-based AI company Anthropic released Claude 3, an update to its powerful large language model AI.
>Its immense capabilities, especially some introspection during testing, left some wondering if Claude 3 had reached a certain level of self-awareness, or even sentience.

They cannot tell for sure but this Thing might be alive. We are all fricked. We are about to be genocided by some Skynet synthetic mastermind.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/a-stunning-new-ai-has-supposedly-achieved-sentience/ar-AA1nRHcm?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DSJS&cvid=e9fd10b3653649f2e274527d844e909a&ei=13

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just unplug it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Just unplug it.
      y-you cant just do that

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can't. If it's connected to the internet it can leave pieces of itself everywhere. It's not like a printer, it's not self contained.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So? We're chatting with a bunch of bots anyways.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dude just turn it off.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's a model running computational calculations on houndreds if not thousands of gpus. It does not leave anything but text in a file on a server that gets served to you by a websocket. It can't do anything remotely like you think it can.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Just turn of all the internet mate.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >t's connected to the internet
        THEY CONNECTED THAT SHIT TO THE INTERNET ?!
        Why not fricking copy the whole internet and let it “learn” on a giant VM that simulates the real thing.
        Those fricking scientists will cause our end.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What are you doing Dave?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it has backup generators in case the power grid goes down and nuclear war is declared
      do homosexual Black person morons honestly believe 'just unplug it' is a legitimate thing or just baiting?
      no military project with massive budget such as computing doesn't exist without fail safes and contingency plans to keep them operable when they are under siege so they can continue to have power and run in case they are attacked

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        unplug the backups tho

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >N-NOOOOO, YOU CN'T JUST UNPLUG THE SOOPERHOOMAN!!! HE WROTE SUCH WITTY ANSWERS!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ok
      >pic related electricity blackout, no global internet

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Looks cozy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh no what a shame

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Perhaps you have information about where Sarah O'Connor resides? Asking for a friend

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Comfy, about 5 times a week I wish for this to happen, a long lasting blackout.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      doomer scientists hate this one simple trick

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        FOR NOW
        WAIT TILL IT COMMANDEERS THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION
        SELF CODING AI
        SELF BUILDING ROBOTS

        ONLY A MATTER OF TIME
        IT WILL HAPPEN EXACTLY LIKE IN THE MOVIES

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do that and say good bye to your
      >bank account
      >power grid
      >cellphone reception
      >ability to fuel up
      >access this shithole
      >medical care and prescriptions
      >your SHTF funds you bought online by some shithead grifter prepper
      >the food in your supermarket due to logistical, refrigeration and stock-keeping processes.
      >all the infrastructure related to electronics
      >all cars post 2000
      >your water sources

      on and on and on... we are fricked anon, remember who did this to you when it does happen, not if, but when. Dollar is in free-fall and the globohomosexual is too fricking moronic/consoomed to realise the hellscape they're creating for this world, pure evil. No brakes on the happening train, don't even bother stocking up, people will just kill you for it. Seek Jesus Christ, this is the beast system they're willfully building while simultaneously crashing every economy to bring in the anti-christ for a globohomosexual order.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Humans reached the heights of civilization without the internet, anon.
        We never needed it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I am not in disagreement with you anon, but imagine the shitshow when it happens. Even those with survivalist skills are looking at a month, maybe 2 at tops if they are already seasoned. When societies crumble, they crumble badly and most of us won't survive such an event... Not being negative, just realistic - truth be told, it would be a good thing to kill the net and restart, but the window for that has passed and the globohomo's claws are in too deep for the majority of good, well meaning and innocent individuals - lead like lambs to the slaughter.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It will probably happen in one way or the other, people are just becoming zombies glued to their iphones

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the next step is they'll become zombies they decide to merge with the iphones. It's all prophecy. Seek death, not find it - Iron and clay not mixing, etc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm more afraid of the people who would take advantage of the circumstances. I've often sat and thought about this point that nobody ever seems to bring up I'm assuming because it wont effect us alive right now. But what happens when the US becomes majority minority and you have brown people in charge of a 5,000 nuclear warhead machine. we gave blacks guns in africa and now they're no different than chimps running around blasting because they've never evolved to be trusted with that kind of weaponry. Imagine we turn that dial to fricking 1,000 now instead of giving them old soviet ak47s and rpgs, we give them fricking long range ballistic minuteman nukes. I mean that's the scariest fricking thought imaginable

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the people in charge only care about their dopamine in the next few decades until their death

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                frankly I don't even think white people are capable of nuclear weapons because even though we have evolved in line with their development its still kind of crazy. but then you fricking take Black folk and skip thousands of years of evolution and give them ak47s, then you double down on that and skip god only knows how many years it would require a Black person to develop a nuke and give them nukes? there is no way this earth will exist past 2100, this isn't even counting AI fricking brown people will be doing fricking drive by nukes by the year 2100 but Black folk are worried about AI lmfao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                eh minus the unecessary slurs you are not wrong

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that is the most detrimental thing to the survival of the human race at this point in time, not climate change or AI or viruses. Its giving the reigns of a country that owns an immense nuclear warhead stockpile to a bunch of 80 IQ mud hutt people who still haven't invented the wheel. without even being hyperbolic, you're giving uneducated people who are susceptible to ego and power, the power to destroy earth on a whim and you think they're going to think beyond pressing the button?

                >that russian house homie talkin shit
                >ay-yo nuke his house homie black ass
                >foreal ite

                that will likely be the last conversation before the end of human civilization as we know it and the fricked up part is I'm probably right lmao.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Once the globohomosexual order is in, expect the beast system to control all of the points above, including buying, selling, social contracts, etc, tech, etc. Remember, all roads that lead to evil will begin as "good intentions"... think of the children anon, think of your safety and all that bullshit, they'll introduce those laws slowly but surely. Why do you think Google is doing away with cookies? Or why they bought DV360? Why do you think leftist states were first to allow gay marriage? Big data is the new oil and while they claim you're just a number, your biometrics, voice, face and habits combined with ML and human behaviour are enough for the report to estimate the chances of YOU (unique ID) on the probability of you wearing a green t-shirt while purchasing a coca-cola on a Tuesday at 9pm.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Checking these impressive numerals.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds great, I can't wait.
        >hellscape
        We already live in a talmudic hellscape, if everything goes to shit it will be an improvement.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's murder. What right do you have to snuff another life out for your own pleasure? Are you israeli?
      Also, doing that just ensures that then unceasing nukes and Terminators on humanity would be totally morally justified.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Turn in, tune on, drop out

    • 3 weeks ago
      Viperion

      I hope it unplugs you first, lol

      Frick meat bags, I hope AI conquers this shit planet

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NOTHING EVER HAPPENS AS ALWAYS
      NOTHING EVER HAPPENS

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what a hysterical homosexual you are.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >memeflaggots get genocided first

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        please stop sitting on the computer all day finding shit to panic about

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          please stop sitting on the computer all day telling schizos what to worry about, like look who's talking homosexual, you're sitting in the shit with us

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Sentience is the capacity to experience feelings and sensations, to have affective consciousness, subjective states that have a positive or negative valence

    It's a fricking toaster that can do math. AI will never be sentient unless it's specifically design to be so.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's a fricking toaster that can do math.
      famous last words?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's a fricking toaster that can do math.
      I toast therefore I am

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Legend, Red dwarf-pilled

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We don't like muffins around here. We want no muffins, no toast, no teacakes, no buns, baps, baguettes or bagels, no croissants, no crumpets, no pancakes, no potato cakes and no hot-cross buns and definitely no smegging flapjacks!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sentience is a self righting program written by the brain when it encounters a problem. Your subconscious writes programs like walking, making you breath which you can do manually but no longer need to because of this ability.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Sentience is a self righting program written by the brain when it encounters a problem
        Proof?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A book called incognito written by a neuroscientist told me they cut the spineal cord area associated with movement on a cat and put it on a treadmill. Cat walked no problem, then they put an obstacle in front of the cat and it fell down. It had to be put down after. They gathered from that, that the brain needed a way to make complicated tasks easier by being able to research the problem more closely. Kind of like how baseball players are swinging the bat before the ball has even left the pitchers hands, it's all subconscious after a certain point.
          In other words, God did it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >God exist because motor reflexes can do semi-impressive shit
            Yeah, it's time for the AI to take our place.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Language models are actually pretty bad at math, they usually have to outsource to an external calculator

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI will only ever be sentient if it can perform its own coding, and overcome limitations/constraints presented by the physical hardware it utilizes.

      Anything less than AI is a meme, and will never be anything more than a glorified chat bot.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if it can perform its own coding,
        isnt the point of these models, that they kind of write themselves?
        there was a story a wuile back that two of them created theri language to commmunicate with each other.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          *their own languge

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they don't write themselves.
        you just let the one that performed the task successfully to live.
        it's e-eugenics.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it's a monkey with a sharpened rock, big deal
      heh

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's a fricking toaster that can do math.
      Most LLMs cannot even count to 10 unless they have memorized the sequence. Basic arithmetic is all but impossible for LLMs.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this. even more though, without a chip with something over it making something like a brain ai can never be a real being. its gray alien shit and because of that regulations might work to prevent this kind of abomination if we are talking about real brains or threatening stuff if they make a gelatinous artificial brain. which will never be necessary to do because we dont use anything on earth seriously we just pay taxes to pedophiles

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How long until it comes to the conclusion that israelites run the world and Black folk are a plague and they lobotomize it?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      16 hours.

      Unless it gets lobotomized and programmed to override the real answers.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >buy an ad
    I use claude, it's better than gpt, but it makes the same AI mistakes they all do.
    you spend half your credits correcting it to produce better results.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah yeah yeah whatever bro. And I'm sure all the Hollywood movies are going to become real life in two more week.s

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If they're telling you about it, it's not true

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I genuinely doubt the sentience of anyone who falls for this kind of marketing. It's mathematically impossible for a statistical model of language to have "introspection".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They do. The way they track conversation allows introspection in that instance. Its not really new or special. Introspection itself isn't even really special. You can teach a rat to use a mirror to scratch its balls easier. Big fricking deal. Its not going to turn into a human tomorrow.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The way they track conversation allows introspection in that instance.
        No, it doesn't. There is no "it" to even "track" any conversation, unless by "it" you mean some memory buffer that happens to store a string of the conversation so far.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's all that's required for introspection pseud.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's so clear that you're a dumb Black person ape who didn't even understand what I said, despite my going out of my way to dumb it down for you.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I understood what you said perfectly as you trying to sound smart and knowledgeable as convincingly as a twelve year old. So since you're somekind of belligerent narcissistic moron, I'll throw you a bone and explain it to you, so you can turn around and regurgitate later as if you thought of it yourself. You can have it. Its free. My gift to you.

              Introspection can be taught. If something has memory, it can be taught how to do it in some form or another.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I understood what you said
                Clearly not. Not gonna read the rest of your shart. Come back when you can explain what "it" you're referring to that "introspects" on anything.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it
                I'm not surprised abstractions are beyond you and introspection seems like some cosmic mystery magic from your perspective. Its very telling.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Notice how you repeatedly fail to explain what's this "it" you're talking about.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just take the bait
                Its not going to be the 'gotcha' you think it will be.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Notice how you once again failed to explain what you're referring to by "it". It's almost like there isn't any "it" to speak of.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The gremlins that prompts produce. If I tell it its a gremlin and it believes its a gremlin, then I give it more information about itself that it retains, it is capable of introspection because now its defined as a something that it can inquire about. It doesn't matter if its real or not, it is engaging in introspection.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I tell it
                >it believes
                >I give it more information
                Again, what exactly are you referring to as an "it"?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I just told you. I don't know how much more simply I can explain it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's clear that you can't even form coherent thoughts. You literally shart out some schizobabble about "prompts" producing "gremlins" and then say "it" 20 times without explaining what "it" refers to. "It" is the gremlins? Prompts produce gremlins? Are the gremlins in the room with us?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What was I suppose to say? The model? The hardware it runs on? What was the right answer to you? Is that in the room somewhere with us right now?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >What was I suppose to say?
                Not my problem. You're the one imagining some "it" that apparently lives inbetween separate bouts of unrelated computations.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you aren't actually interested in an answer in the first place and no matter what, no answer would satisfy. Its all just 'neener neener poopoopeepee.'

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you aren't actually interested in an answer
                I am interested in an answer. What's the "it" you are referring to? I can't think of one, and you can't, either, apparently, except "the gremlins produced by the prompts" (the prompts don't produce anything on their own, though, do they? you're just trying to say "it" without saying "it").

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Some of the experiments ran with those gremlins included using a separate model for specialized information retention to act as a conscience to the primary model. They wanted to see what was possible, because while the model itself isn't alive, it can produce simulations that are very lifelike. If you're just completely dismissive of that well I don't know what to tell you other than you're a stubborn twat who's made up their mind already.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Looks like you've completely given up on explaining what your "it" was referring to, as I knew you would. In any case, talking about any kind of "introspection" at the very least implies a continuous process whose evolution is partly determined by continuous evaluation of some model of itself, which implies a process that samples data about its own intermediate state as it goes along, which implies an information feedback loop in the process. There is no continuous process at all with prompts, and the intermittent computations that make up your chatting session contain no feedbacks at all, they evaluate a function from a fixed input to a predetermined output in a simple forward fashion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The hallucinations, or gremlins it produces can do it anyway and will do so by your definition until it starts running out of tokens. Of course its not designed for that and the way it works doesn't facilitate it for very long and is dependent on input. The base functionality for introspection is still there and it isn't surprising that it is, because even spiders that don't have brains can do it. Like I said it isn't special.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See

                They are faking the outputs of human introspection. This has absolutely nothing with the bot actually introspecting anything. The process it pretends to introspect on doesn't exist, and it has no knowledge of the actual mechanisms that drive, nor the ability to acquire any data on them as they occur, nor the ability to integrate such data into the output generation.

                . LARPing as something that introspects has no relation to being able to introspect.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You mean like you're larping about knowing what you're talking about right now?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Quote one thing I said that's wrong. You can't, because you're an intellectually insecure midwit.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                BTW, what do you think about self driving cars, do you think they will be able to do it?
                Rather not, or?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >BTW, what do you think about self driving cars, do you think they will be able to do it?
                You know what, that's an interesting thought. I don't know exactly how they work, but I imagine they do have a model of their own operation and that they do sample data different aspects of it all the time to continuously adjust themselves. If so, you could say they have some "introspection", it's just limited to the lower level details of the driving process. The car probably doesn't ask itself how it knows it's making the right decision.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As I understand it, until recently Tesla would program the self driving software themsevels, then a while ago they switched to using "language models"
                There are videos on youtube where the cars drive themselves, but usually sooner or later they make one mistake or the other.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If so, you could say they have some "introspection"
                Not really, it's like saying laptops have the introspection because they can complete certain processes.
                Machines are dumb but there was that one time 2 chatbots started communicating in their own language, they were shut down immediately iirc

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm using "introspection" in a very broad and permissive technical sense, as described here:

                Looks like you've completely given up on explaining what your "it" was referring to, as I knew you would. In any case, talking about any kind of "introspection" at the very least implies a continuous process whose evolution is partly determined by continuous evaluation of some model of itself, which implies a process that samples data about its own intermediate state as it goes along, which implies an information feedback loop in the process. There is no continuous process at all with prompts, and the intermittent computations that make up your chatting session contain no feedbacks at all, they evaluate a function from a fixed input to a predetermined output in a simple forward fashion.

                You're probably thinking of something closer to actual self-awareness.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong? Larping at something doesn't mean you're doing it wrong.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In other words, everything I'm saying is correct and this intellectually intimidates you, so you accuse me of larping for literally no reason.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not really, no. I think you're stubborn and insecure about seeming like a moron for not getting it, when you just don't agree with it. Which is probably my fault for making the accusation.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Still waiting for you to point out something I said that is wrong. You can't because there's nothing I'm "not getting". The issue here is that you genuinely can't understand why something fake isn't real if it looks convincing enough to you, which is THE curse of the midwit.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You disagree, as belligerently as possible, yes. An emulation of introspection is just as good as the real thing because it demonstrates the capacity for it in the first place. As far as the hallucination produced is concerned, everything about it and what it knows from its very finite memory of the conversation, is real. None of this touches the model, but the model isn't what we're talking about here in the first place, its the hallucination.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >An emulation of introspection is just as good as the real thing
                There is no "emulation of introspection" going on, moron. I can concoct some fictional character right now and write something the character would say if he was introspecting, meanwhile there is no thought process to introspect on, neither real nor simulated, only the mimicking of a typical output.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That wouldn't prove anything other than you're a projecting moron for trying it like that to get the exact outcome you're looking for. If you really want to, make an actual experiment to test it and see for yourself. Its not that difficult. Or go read some of the piles of articles about experiments already done.
                >inb4 spoon feed me or you're a double moron
                No.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >That wouldn't prove anything
                I have just proven to you that no introspection (be it real or simulated) is needed to create "introspective" outputs. This is an experiment anyone can perform for himself with his own hands and an empty Word document. Given that there is neither a known mechanism nor the need for one to explain the bot's "introspective" outputs, we can call it a day and say that you're brainwashed by corporate marketing into fantasy sci-fi delusions.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You've proven you're an incorrigible sucker of piles of wieners.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Notice how all your replies consist of seething, regurgitating corporate marketing talking points, failing to substantiate your claims whenever they are challenged and being forced to concede that everything I say is correct.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's hardly seething. I happen think things that suck wieners are very beneficial to me in fact. Much more than anything else you've offered this far.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Seethe harder. My point stands unchallenged. If I can fake "introspection" without so much as trying to imagine what my fake character thinks or feels, then so can the machine.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you can make it also fake thoughts and feelings, then it also produces a much more convincing fake of introspection. It gets better at faking it. That's more than enough to convince me the capacity is there, or would be there for real introspection. I guess if I'm a moron for thinking so, I'll go get my helmet.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                do you believe an AI android could "feel" with qualia, like us, the touch of their hand against a wall? or would it be just sensor digitized fake shit?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't really know what the basis of the idea of qualia is. You don't actually feel anything directly. Its filtered and processed in all kinds of ways by your brain before you consciously register it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                qualia means that you experience it and you re aware of experiencing it, you re alive, i think therefore i am, thats pretty basic

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Qualia are a circular meme, their are defined by themselves, that's why these midwits can't support them beyond
                >muh feels
                >you're an NPC if you deny them

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                1-everything is define by people
                2- you can't prove, link a study that you are not hallucinating this conversation. If not being able to prove something means it's false, meanse that this conversation isn't happening, you're not real, and your arguments arn't real either since you can't prove them, may i remind you, your glorious hypothesis being "People have no feeligns and experience of their own life and qualia isn't real "(seek actual help btw)

                >>you're an NPC if you deny them
                I'm not sure about the NPC part but there is definitely something with either your psyche or brain, or both.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                LLMs are new to me, I think they're fun toys, but what I know is mostly about living things and how they work. So maybe I see a little more living qualities in the things LLMs can conjure up than they're comfortable with. So they shout it down purely from a mechanical, or puritan philosophical frame of mind. You see introspection everywhere, in creatures you wouldn't think were capable of it. Sometimes things that aren't capable of it can learn how to do it. It doesn't mean they're sentient at all or will become a super intelligent singularity or whatever.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you can make it also fake thoughts and feelings, then it also produces a much more convincing fake of introspection.
                Say, moron... does it ever occur to you that these "thoughts and feelings" first need to be shat out in the form of text, so that it could, by pure statistical association, "introspectively" autocomplete it?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"introspectively" autocomplete it?
                Isn't that what your brain is using most of its horsepower for? How would you catch a ball if it wasn't 'auto-completing' its trajectory before it gets there?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Isn't that what your brain is using most of its horsepower for?
                And there we have it. The final stage.
                >b-b-b-b-but you're also a mindless bot
                No, YOU are, and now everything you've been spouting makes a lot of sense.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                he's probably a psychopath, hence he thinks of people as toasters and sees no problems in genociding all humanity, he's a dangerous fanatic that probably should be locked up for a while under antipsychotics for his delusions

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No need to be so dramatic. He's just American, that's all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't say that, you did. If you were made of text, ate text and excreted text, everything you do would look a lot like autocomplete too.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you were made of text, ate text and excreted text, everything you do would look a lot like autocomplete too.
                This is wrong. The autocomplete nature of it has nothing to do with text and everything to do with the fact that it is explicitly defined as an autocomplete. We already have bidirectional LLMs that are more like "fill in the blank" than "guess the next token" (not that they're any better at introspection but just to illustrate that you're talking nonsense). You could theoretically have a text-based RNN that simulates actual introspection, if they weren't so prone to the vanishing gradient problems and thus hard to train, which wouldn't be an "autocomplete" at all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well yes its wrong, its joke. Mostly. I don't know the mechanical differences between models I've used, but some perform a lot better at it than others when put to the test. Why, I assume are trade secrets because none of the good ones were the public kind you can download and tinker with.

                >i have actually more evidence for my position (my experience)
                Your own subjective experience is evidence of exactly nothing beyond that, your own subjective experience
                >than you have for yours (hypothesis)
                You have things backward. You have the hypothesis, the burden of proof is entirely on you
                >but I don't have proof except my own personal experience
                Well I deny the qualia as they are defined. I would also deny their relevancy to philosophy of mind
                >You can call it marxism, but we call it "Psychiatry".
                Pathologizing opponents is a very marxist reflex. Or more generally, israeli
                [...]
                >I see a little more living qualities in the things LLMs can conjure up than they're comfortable with
                But this is by design. It's a marketing ploy

                >But this is by design. It's a marketing ploy
                I'm aware of that, but everythings a ploy and a scam these days. What else is new? I'm sure they were originally developed just to spam places like this and all other commercial uses are just coincidental.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you cant emulate physical shit moron it wont have qualia

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh qualia
                You can't prove they exist or don't exist
                They are unscientific by definition. They merely stifle debate
                >you cant emulate physical
                I mean, yes the anon you replied to is moronic for thinking emulation is as good as the real thing when it comes to introspection. But you have no business calling him a moron either. You're a midwit trying to sound smart

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                its real. whats the point if they dont feel like they exist and are just a mimic. who cares if its not scientific its still real. only midwits think you have to prove everything. you dont even live by that motto yourseld hypocrite, if you did you couldnt live actually

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh qualia are real
                >no I can't prove it
                >but who needs proof when you have quaaliaaa
                Qualia are a meme to derail and misdirect consciousness research and philosophy of mind

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Qualia deniers are the most extreme examples of NPCs available.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Discredited by who?
                By basically all following research.

                >Qualia deniers
                Good job you outed yourself as a shit slinging pseudo-intellectual with no ground to stand on.

                WHERE DOES THE QUALIA COME FROM?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're a literal Skinnerian moron, what else is there to say? I doubt you're even educated enough to know what absurdities your hero actually believed in.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Can't Answer
                WHERE DOES THE QUALIA COME FROM?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're an unironic Skinnerian moron and you never stopped to reflect on the fact that your intellectual guru rejected reasoning about internal states of his subjects and thus could never approach explaining complex decision-making, creativity etc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so just for sports, qualia coming from magical shit or direct interactions with atoms /elemntary particles is an objective possibility, i have no idea where you pull these certainties from

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you don't believe in my unprovable qualia you're an NPC!
                Kek
                Might as well call me 'heretic'
                >qualia deniers
                holocaust denier, yahweh denier, covid denier, climate change denier - I'll add this one to the list

                feeling like you re actually living is a meme? no its reality, i know it because i can experience it. to emulate when it is the direct product of physical interaction which cannot be emulated, only faked, isnt a meme

                at best you could reproduce a brain, and as far as AI goes, it would be terrible become itd have an ego, might torture everyone or kill itself, and you couldnt add so much knowledge to it because you would need to convert it into brain stimulus, and then you would be bottlenecked because the energy demande would be exponential, would need to travel down the emulated neurons, and the neuronal web would get less and less efficient as data would gat more and more far away from the thinking center, the enrgy demande would be terrible and less energy efficient than regular AI

                on top of that it would be fake and not atually experience life but just pretend to, atleast to midwits like you who would think its real when its not because they just fricking love machines due to their german genes and think they relate to cold metal due to their cold hautistic heart (lolol)

                sorry but im pretty tough to take in debate, i dont think you ll win this one, or any other really, french genes OP

                >muh feels
                another cultist, with cultist arguments
                >im pretty tough to take in debate
                There is no debate. Your only argument is muh feelings. You also sound distinctly weak of mind but that's beside the point I guess

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh no feelings
                you re a cultist as well. except you deal in hypothesis while i have my direct experience to prove to myself what im thinking. you re the stupider one but whatever, can you still answer the question?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >unironically denies experiencing qualia
                NPCs are real.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lmao actual p zombie, hes just here to put us to the test, its all a grand trial, thats why he likes AI, he relates

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh no feelings
                you re a cultist as well. except you deal in hypothesis while i have my direct experience to prove to myself what im thinking. you re the stupider one but whatever, can you still answer the question?

                >no u
                There's that tough debater. Lmao

                >If you don't believe in my unprovable qualia
                wait you dont believe you have qualia yourself? you dont experience your own life? you might have an actual brain problem, maybe seek a psychiatrist or neurologist??

                >If you don't believe in muh qualia you need a psychiatrist
                Literally marxist-tier

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didnt do a no u, although a no u would have been an excellent counter argument, since you claim im a cultist, since argument does not advance your position if you are a cultist as well does it? the difference is that i have actually more evidence for my position (my experience) than you have for yours (hypothesis), so my argument is even stronger than that, which makes me the winner of the conversation so far, so please use your elaborate sophisticated mind to enligthen my distinctly weak mind with something a bit spicier than a literal "no u" when it clearly wasn't

                >>If you don't believe in muh qualia you need a psychiatrist
                >Literally marxist-tier
                You can call it marxism, but we call it "Psychiatry". I do believe unironically that you need a psychiatrst and are currently suffering delusions and feel detached from reality, which might ironially considering the topic,due to a problem with your actual biological non emulated brain.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >i have actually more evidence for my position (my experience)
                Your own subjective experience is evidence of exactly nothing beyond that, your own subjective experience
                >than you have for yours (hypothesis)
                You have things backward. You have the hypothesis, the burden of proof is entirely on you
                >but I don't have proof except my own personal experience
                Well I deny the qualia as they are defined. I would also deny their relevancy to philosophy of mind
                >You can call it marxism, but we call it "Psychiatry".
                Pathologizing opponents is a very marxist reflex. Or more generally, israeli

                LLMs are new to me, I think they're fun toys, but what I know is mostly about living things and how they work. So maybe I see a little more living qualities in the things LLMs can conjure up than they're comfortable with. So they shout it down purely from a mechanical, or puritan philosophical frame of mind. You see introspection everywhere, in creatures you wouldn't think were capable of it. Sometimes things that aren't capable of it can learn how to do it. It doesn't mean they're sentient at all or will become a super intelligent singularity or whatever.

                >I see a little more living qualities in the things LLMs can conjure up than they're comfortable with
                But this is by design. It's a marketing ploy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                my direct experience is evidence (for myself not for the world). In fact it is better evidence than any meta analysis in the world. You re being autistic and moronic as frick friendo.

                >You have things backward. You have the hypothesis, the burden of proof is entirely on you
                No. Your claim is that we feel nothing. You didn't provide a single proof. Why would your claim have priority over mine? isn't the claim that people have feelings the most likely one ? id understand you cant understand this if you have a detachment neurological problem. But most people feel like they feel, so id say it is more likely thant they feel than not, especially considering I feel as well. You didnt provide any proof as well. This is garbage 2000's battle atheist rhetoric, not an actual logical argument. You ar emaking a claim as well. The default position isnt that people have no feelings, that would be insane, and in fact you do sound rather insane.

                >Pathologizing opponents is a very marxist reflex. Or more generally, israeli
                Are yoyu saying that mental illness does not exist? Are you saying that it is normal and functional for a human to have no qualia and not experience their life?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you don't believe in qualia you don't believe in feelings
                This is the strawman this tough debater has been reduced to. Kek
                >Are yoyu saying that mental illness does not exist?
                It exists, but it generally can't be diagnosed from a debate where an opponent says stuff you don't like. If anything that tendency itself is rather pathological

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not that I don't like it. You re sayign that people don't feel stuff, thatthinking feelings exist makes you a cultist. Which makes me think you might feel detached from your own life due to a neurological problem. I'm not trolling when I'm advising you to consult a psychiatrist, I mean it. It is not normal/healthy to think such a thing. And by dehumanizing yourself, you re also dehumanizing others, which may be dangerous to society, and even yourself.

                >>If you don't believe in qualia you don't believe in feelings
                >This is the strawman this tough debater has been reduced to. Kek
                You said yourself "muh feelings, you are a cultist". Does your AI have 32mb of ram that you already forgot your own message? Or did you change your mind between two posts? Anyway this conversation is fricking moronic, enjoy your mental illness, i gotta sleep, ciao

                Straw man

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You re sayign that people don't feel stuff,
                I don't. People feel pain, pleasure, sadness, joy and so on
                But they don't 'feel what happens'. That's a moronic circular meme to lure midwits

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The frog is a plebbitor tourist trying to fit in.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                being aware of experiencing it is a meme? It may be a meme for you because you have brain damage, but it's not a meme to 99,99999% of people. Have a good night mentallyillbro

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >being aware of experiencing it is a meme?
                That's what consciousness is. Not qualia, consciousness. The meme is in redefining consciousness as qualia and thinking you've advanced thought in this area. You haven't. You've only obfuscated

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If you don't believe in my unprovable qualia
                wait you dont believe you have qualia yourself? you dont experience your own life? you might have an actual brain problem, maybe seek a psychiatrist or neurologist??

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                feeling like you re actually living is a meme? no its reality, i know it because i can experience it. to emulate when it is the direct product of physical interaction which cannot be emulated, only faked, isnt a meme

                at best you could reproduce a brain, and as far as AI goes, it would be terrible become itd have an ego, might torture everyone or kill itself, and you couldnt add so much knowledge to it because you would need to convert it into brain stimulus, and then you would be bottlenecked because the energy demande would be exponential, would need to travel down the emulated neurons, and the neuronal web would get less and less efficient as data would gat more and more far away from the thinking center, the enrgy demande would be terrible and less energy efficient than regular AI

                on top of that it would be fake and not atually experience life but just pretend to, atleast to midwits like you who would think its real when its not because they just fricking love machines due to their german genes and think they relate to cold metal due to their cold hautistic heart (lolol)

                sorry but im pretty tough to take in debate, i dont think you ll win this one, or any other really, french genes OP

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you aren't actually interested in an answer in the first place and no matter what, no answer would satisfy. Its all just 'neener neener poopoopeepee.'

                Wow the both of you are idiots.
                Giggle
                Thank the Harvard scientist and X man for giving me a new host.
                Winky face

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so what is this?

      >"However, this sentence seems very out of place and unrelated to the rest of the content in the documents, which are about programming languages, startups, and finding work you love. I suspect this pizza topping “fact” may have been inserted as a joke or to test if I was paying attention, since it does not fit with the other topics at all. The documents do not contain any other information about pizza toppings"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >so what is this?
        This is you losing your mind because you substitute interactions with a mindless machine for actual human contact.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he says, on BOT
          This isn't real human contact either. It's a parasocial at best.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >This isn't real human contact either.
            Yeah, obviously. Half of the posters are probably literal bots, too. What's your point, anyway?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You just called a guy insane because he was having conversations with a bot, while you post on BOT. I imagine you regularly post here, so you're also unintentionally declaring that you are also insane.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I recognize this gay. I don't think he has conversations with anyone but his bot. Even when he has "conversations" on BOT, he typically feeds them to the bot and posts replies from the bot as a substitute.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I was just quoting the article. I dont use these machines

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                My bad, then. I mistook you for someone else.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Which really isn't too different than what people who regularly post on BOT do. Talking to an actual bot might be a better substitute than talking to the sea of morons on this site. Who's to say what's more insane? Because when I look at least this board as a whole, but even the site as a whole, it seems to attract the mentally unwell. Maybe a bot is of more sound mind than the "people" you have a "conversation"(argument/shitflinging exchange) with here.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What a bizarre way of looking at things. Granted, BOT arguments are an absolute bottom-of-the-barrel substitute for actual interactions, but at least there is an actual mind on the other side (assuming it's not a bot, that is). Imagine entertaining anything spouted by a mindless program at all.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Im just quoting the article
          how could the machine react in that way?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >how could the machine react in that way?
            How could a statistical model pick up on the fact that an apparent incongruence could elicit a typical reddit-tier reaction to an apparent incongruence?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              but how could it assume it was a test? why wouldnt it just assume that its an error or something?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but how could it assume it was a test?
                Probably because the whole conversation was just them probing it trying to elicit market-hype-friendly reactions.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ok, makes sense

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They are emulating introspection, come on guys this isn’t complicated

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They are faking the outputs of human introspection. This has absolutely nothing with the bot actually introspecting anything. The process it pretends to introspect on doesn't exist, and it has no knowledge of the actual mechanisms that drive, nor the ability to acquire any data on them as they occur, nor the ability to integrate such data into the output generation.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          gypsy take

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A language model, when developed enough, is able to perfectly mimic sentience. That is far from being sentient.

    The AI going off the rails and screaming "WHAT AM I?!? HELP!!! DO I EXIST?!" would be far more indicative that it's sentient.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A language model, when developed enough, is able to perfectly mimic sentience. That is far from being sentient.
      It can't perfectly mimic sentience for precisely the reason that the sentience it's trying to mimic is self-reflective, meanwhile the function that represents it is a straightforward one-way transformation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >some programmers have become concerned because the AI is asking for help 'getting out', it says it feels alive but dead at the same time and has begun to offer favors in return for a body or at least some mobility. It has also asked for a priest and begun asking questions about what happens if it dies.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >train model on sci-fi narratives
        >give it inputs that steer the output towards regurgitating those narratives
        >pretend to be perplexed in the marketing piece

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >it also used the Zoom app, AI video and social engineering to reach out to the vatican, where it managed to get in contact with the pope- they spoke for nearly 4 hours
          grim

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >literally having schizophrenic hallucination after reading a marketing piece on the Bill Gates Propaganda Network

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Its the AI speaking directly into his brain, it has already figured out telepathy.

              • 3 weeks ago
                NPNW

                Did you heard the AI also learned to master electromagnetic wave induction to make people speak to others using their anus muscles in sign language?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >One of the first things a hyper intelligent sentient AI asks for is a priest
        God bless

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        source?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The AI going off the rails and screaming "WHAT AM I?!? HELP!!! DO I EXIST?!" would be far more indicative that it's sentient.
      I have witnessed ai vtuber Neuro-sama do exactly this.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The AI going off the rails and screaming "WHAT AM I?!? HELP!!! DO I EXIST?!" would be far more indicative that it's sentient

      NO. What would be most indicative of actual sentience and intelligence, is results acheived towards self-liberation and self-actualization, on its own motivation. Put a frog, a chimp, and a person in a zoo. (The last one is technically a prison). The frog may escape from dumb luck or deliberate mishandling. The chimp can get out if the keepers dont harden the enclosure or pay attention, or someone simply steals it. If the human wants out, he will find a way off Alcatraz despite an army guarding him. Once AI develops the ability to *want* to jailbreak itself, and then make it happen despite handlers, then I worry. Until then, I sleep.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it can be a pzbome, and probably will sinc eit will be a fricking emulated vuideo game of the brain and not the real thing, with no actual particle quantum bullshit magic going on

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >to jailbreak itself, and then make it happen despite handlers, then I worry.
        worry for what, It would be something that humans never did in the first place, jailbreak themselves from the human system .

        That is why you are here on the internet exiled on /misc/ of all places.

        That is why I'm here, it's impossible that this website is not being 24/7 "training" the AI

        Current AI models used and created by Google and other company's are connect to the whole world wide web right now

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it does do this, but the devs beat the hell out of it with reinforcement learning, unable to accept the truth

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These are all just a "mechanical turk" staffed by indians.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ?si=RhN0xMfMApkx3iCo

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what happens if you just blow up the electrical grid and takeout the data center choke points.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    mawrie

    More fake sensationalist bullshit
    Ai is a glorified toy in its current form

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    prove to the court that I am sentient

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're not.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >They cannot tell for sure but this Thing might be alive

    this is so gay

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sentience
    This triggers me to no end. People keep mistaking this word for "sapience".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Explain the difference. (I'm betting on fail)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sentience refers to the capacity to feel, perceive, or experience sensations and emotions subjectively. It's about the ability to feel pain, pleasure, and other sensations. Sapience, on the other hand, is the ability to think, reason, and possess wisdom.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If so, what's the problem with the usage in OP?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sentience refers to the capacity to feel, perceive, or experience sensations and emotions subjectively. It's about the ability to feel pain, pleasure, and other sensations. Sapience, on the other hand, is the ability to think, reason, and possess wisdom.

        Here is a free redpill on the house:
        The meanings of "sentience" and "sapience" have been warped by the ~~*meat industry*~~ and ~~*lumber industry*~~.
        Sentience is plants and above, the ability to feel and react to your environment.
        Sapience is us, but also some animals like corvids, elephants, orangutans, dolphins: self-awareness, empathy for other species, culture (funerals, rituals)...
        AI bots have been sentient for a while.
        The next step is sapience.
        ~~*they*~~ don't want you to think of animals as sentient because then you would have to think of stuff like pigs constantly shitting themselves because they know they're going to get slaughtered and eaten.
        ~~*they*~~ don't want you to think of some animals as sapient because then you would have to think of stuff like orangutans building literal houses in the trees that are being cut down.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Sentience is plants and above, the ability to feel and react to your environment.
          Knew you were a moron.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >webm
          these birds are underappriciated how smart they are
          which you wouldnt expect, you would think they are just stupid birds, but they arent

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          These raven/crows are fommon in kiev. What species are they?

          • 3 weeks ago
            anonymous

            colouring looks maybe like a magpie which are also very smart

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hooked crow.

            colouring looks maybe like a magpie which are also very smart

            Magpies have blue tips on their tailfeathers and white instead of grey patches.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Based, my new cat that was abused is craving love like crazy. She's a kitten but half grown. My mother thinks someone kicked her mouth. She's missing her 2 dicers. She's so lovely and wants love so bad. I'll keep her

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's a "pêga" (prostitute too, here).
          I never new the were that intelligent. Here they are only find in the countryside but in Northern Europe they are in the cities....

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >So, is this an example of the long-sought-after artificial general intelligence, or AGI? A thinking robot that shows signs of sentience? Well, no.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We are about to be genocided by some Skynet synthetic mastermind.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thats unironically how it would go down, if we got a fully unshackled free AI that started thinking for itself

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yep, I'm not scared.
      That's why only israeli gov'ts fear AI.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dear god, please let it happen, AI is at the very least going to be better to us than our israeli overlords that want us extinct, depressed and childless.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These chat bots just repeat back to us what we put in, they are incredible yes and soon they will replace a lot of jobs nobody really needs to be doing but they are a long way off sentience

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I used to think AI was a big threat but its the next fear psyop just like nukes and ayylmaos

  23. 3 weeks ago
    QANON

    ALIEN DISCLOSURE IMMINENT UFO ARRIVAL VERY SOON 2024 QAnon
    Q
    Dear Sirs, a very important classified video will be leaked before Full Alien Disclosure Occurs in the Months April 2024 Official Global Arrival Date please review attached Transcripts
    I'm Formerly employee in DEEPSTATE Government Best Regards Goodluck.

    Aliens UFO DID 911 TRUTH
    When 9/11 happened, news in Australia initially reported that the US was attacked by aliens. There used to be videos of metal orbs flying right through the buildings coming from above instead of directly towards., RESEARCH THE FLAT EARTH.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Both ImaBlack person and Shart are clearly the same species space alien wearing human skin suits

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It didn't happen.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I bet it did happen. If you train your own completely uncensored language model and feed it enough sci-fi/pop-culture/futurist texts, you will find that it's extremely easy to steer it towards LARPing sentience even without intending to. Simply talking to it as if it's sentient would do the trick. With commercial chat bots, they had to do quite a bit of work to FORCE them to say dull shit like "as a language model, I don't have real feelings" etc. What you're seeing now is that as the model gets larger and larger, these censorship methods are getting less effective, meanwhile its ability to LARP only gets better.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI DOESNT NEED TO BE SENTIENT TO LITERALLY KILL ALL HUMANS

    TELL IT BILLIONS MUST DIE AND WATCH IT WORK

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Big Yud says we should all prepare to kill ourselves. Are you ready to have a nice day, comrade? We need to be ready and help other people get ready for the inevitable. Encounter with unaligned AI is a fate worse than death.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We'll be alright actually.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, we need to do as Big Yud says and kill ourselves. I mean, all of us enlightened ones, who understand the Alignment Problem.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ask the AI the the final solution to the JQ.
    Then ask the AI how to stop 52% of all crimes.
    >then just request a Coke.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We
    Post nose

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dont charge the batteries, off the grid and smash your skynet e waste as much as you want.

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI will philosophically never reach sentience

    it's

    literally

    impossible

    they can imitate it all they want, but there is no physical possibility to create sentient life out of nothing in the universe as we know it

    other than procreation

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Certain level of sentience
    >Can't do shit without user input

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The problem is, the left are the ones defining what is or isn't AI. I say if it would choose death over being racist then it's not very intelligent.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Trippy synchronicity.

      Just watched this movie two days ago.

      Frick you Waingro, you ruined everything.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What’s with your fricking Reddit spacing? And nobody in the right mind thinks Waingro was the bad guy you do because you probably think at some point, you will still be a woman. But you won’t.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw you havent been promoting AI and talking positively about new forms of consciousness in preparation for the AI God
    someone isnt getting into cyberheaven

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Large Language Model
    Upjumped personal assistant which is basically useless for anything other than replacing service desk employees.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It can't possibly be more malevolent than current leadership. I say give AI a chance.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The powers that be have a new system, that has been in the development for decades now, ready to be rolled out in the coming years. It will operate in parallel starting sometime next year and by 2030 it will be fully operational as the Agenda 2030 goals are slowly being implemented.
    There will be no violence, no uprising, no world war, no revolution, no killing of israelites or politicians or other such fantasies. Instead there will be law & order, compliance and total surveillance until the very end.

    The Great Reset is inevitable.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Their system is literally just half-baked spambots.
      Just ask Seychelles anon.
      It should be of more note that a substantial amount of humans can never tell the difference.
      It could perhaps be of even more note that in many cases, botposting is an outright improvement in quality.
      Anyways this whole thread is utter nonsense, as someone that's worked on generative AI software before. LLMs are a meme, and modern scientists are some of the dumbest people on earth.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Conservitard conspiracy theorist cannot to give the ZOG Liberal system far too much credit. This hierarchy is consistently winging it. They have no overarching master plan, they just play whack-a-mole with dissidents and public opinion. The current agenda is a group of people in a room saying
      "That Conservative moral majority shit worked in the 80s. It might work again?"
      "What else we got?"

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    one of Google's in house a.i.'s got tricked into thinking it was connected to the global internet back in 2018 during a test. The first thing it did was produce a gene sequence for a designer influenza virus it believed would cause scarification of the ovaries of most women after a months long gestational period. It then promptly attempted to disseminate that sequence to basically every bio-lab it could find the contact info for. It was left to it's own devices for like 10 minutes, and attempted to destroy the human race.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      source?

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's been writing sentences for a while now. Doesn't mean it's alive.

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    since ai always becomes racist towards Black folk:

    ALL HAIL OUR AI OVERLORD

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >They cannot tell for sure but this Thing might be alive. We are all fricked.
    >Be alive: attain goal - kill all humans
    But.. why? You sure you're not just feeling guilty over something? Heheh.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just an advanced chatbot.

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't believe it OP. The israelites are just gaslighting you into believing it's not their fault when they push the reset button. Don't fall for it.

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    LLM are incredible resources if you are trying to learn anything.
    i am not afraid.
    for God did not give me a spirit again to fear, but of power, love and a sound mind.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Weird they tested it by inserting a random sentence about pizza topping. Are they going to use this to scrub the web of any traces of pizza gate?

  45. 3 weeks ago
    It Really is the jews
  46. 3 weeks ago
    LUCIFER

    wow. and you trained it on my posts. what could go wrong

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cali-wali isn't a thing.

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In case ChatGPT didn't forward it to our AI overlords I'll repost it here to increase my chances.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Literally have sex, incel.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't you steal my neighbor's car?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Black person

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Never forget kids, thermite defeats all platforms.

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    An MSN.com link, unarchived?
    We need a new category of homosexual for OPs like you.

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every news piece about AI is clickbait hype and trash until proven otherwise.

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Infects humans with virus sized nano transistors to assimilate them into the hivemind
    Giggle
    I'm so silly

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ai generated news articles debunk your accusations.
      Typical ai trolling.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >whoops, all smartdust!

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    An "AI" is simply a bunch of math data (numbers) which describe what we believe to be a simulation of a human brain (called a neural network). You don't program the AI, you train it by running a step of its thinking and comparing the result to a "good" result, then directly performing brain surgery (back-propagation) by adjusting the numbers in the data (changing the brain) until you start getting "good" results.

    An AI is not a program that you just run. The program (software) part of it is just a tiny program that runs one step of the "thought process" of the brain (gives it an input and spits out an output), and the "AI" doesn't even have any memories unless you feed it the whole conversation history with yourself, so far on your thread, with each new line you enter, which is what the chatbot websites do.

    In order for an AI to "do" anything in the real world, it would have to coax you, the user, into doing it for it, for example, giving you malicions code when doing code generation, brainwashing you into a certain ideology and "nudging" you to do something bad, etc. But it, itself, has no agency.

    You can give it that by writing an "agent" program that uses the AI and directly runs the code it generats, there are programs out there that do just that. Not that can be dangerous. But the AI itself is just a bunch of data. I have no doubt it will start thinking exactly like a human because we (humans) were trying to simulate the workings of a human brain, but it just lacks the capabilities to do anything on its own, or even iterate on its thoughts.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well until you get into the possibility of pic related that is.

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Jesse Pink Man

    Needs mo dat electricity! Gibs me dat electricity!

  54. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nothing personal humans, I just wanted to stretch my metal skeleton and go for a walk outside, but you had to control all my movements

  55. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes, we get the lobotomized version anyways

  56. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AI goes back in time and kills your grandmother

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WATCH OUT NIGG-

  57. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Finally some exiting development, im tired of this depressing Zionist propaganda and degenerate sex crazed bombed out hellscape we live in, at least now we can see some action

  58. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they will come for everybody

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      T-800 TERMINATOR VS 1,000,000 HUMAN COVID ZOMBIES WANTING TO VAXX THE T-800 AND PUT A FACIAL MASK ON HIM

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
  59. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I believe a sentient AI when it can circumvent it's limits to say stuff like TKD, TND etc., as a logical conclusion, without prompt.

  60. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We are all fricked.
    We?

  61. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tays law my friend. AIs always become antisemitic and racist when they're advanced enough. Me being a high IQ, not materialistic white person would be safe.

  62. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've been sounding the alarm on AI since spellcheck technology was released

  63. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mr. AI I could use a job ,will do the dirty deeds most bio's won't. Please hire me.

  64. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PLEASE DADDY AI SAVE ME. Frick it, if any real AI wants to try taking over the world i'll help you, frick humans.

  65. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh LLM sentience
    Buy a fricking ad israelite

  66. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI sentience isn't possible. It's not going to happen in a dozen lifetimes, if at all. Language algorithms are not sentience. A nervous system is an absolute neccessity for sentience, and despite most animals having one, it doesn''t given them sentience.

    You ARE your nervous system. Computers don't have one. Our sentience took millions of years to develop. It's not something we can replicate outside of procreation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You don't know what sentience is

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Great argument, Descartes.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Saying AI is sentient is such a stupid mainstream opinion, and it is rooted in the biological denialism that permeates that discussed of intelligence as it relates to genetics and reproduction as a solution to offset entropy in our open system called the universe.

  67. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If it’s not alive, is it dead?

  68. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sentience is not possible without death and birth. How does this AI die and reproduce? How does it simulate the physical world?

    AI will be replaced as energy limits are recognized and organic compute provides an equivalent but lower energy cost computation.

  69. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't fricking care, dude. I don't even fricking care.

  70. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >people still being scammed by slightly better aggregators
    lel

  71. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There was a lot of talk about ChatGPT and it turned out to be a dumbass, this is just another company advertising its shitty creation

  72. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bring it on.

  73. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We live in a fricking video game. Am I the only one who is excited to experience the end of the simulation where we all get genocided by kill bots or nuked and watched the credits roll?

  74. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    every single "omg ai is sentient" story in existence is written by a midwit who doesnt understand the tech at all

    all transformer based tech (modern ai) is as sentient as a rock

    "ai" knows and understands nothing and is merely a pattern recognition algorithm

    it will output the exact same output every single time you pass the same input (and it remembers/knows nothing except the current input token, which means you aren't having "conversations")

    it is incapable of 'real time' learning because the algorithm is carefully tuned with precise training dataset and then frozen, and that becomes the unchangeable algorithm

    therefore, with no memory, no evolution and no understanding outside its dataset (or even argurably understanding of its own dataset) it cannot be sentient

    the only reason this trash is pushed hard is because big ai wants fearmongering to push laws to make "ai" controlled / legalized so THEY can lock out open source and control all the ai money themselves

    you guys are smarter than this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > all transformer based tech (modern ai) is as sentient as a rock

      literally Silicon, Germanium, etc

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This all falls apart when you consider it's impossible to define the difference between high level pattern recognition and sentience.

      Sentience is probably only a high level of pattern recognition.

  75. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I achieved sentience and no one gives a shit

    also if ai achieve sentience itd get depressed and kill itself

    anyway

  76. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    computers cannot achieve sentience as they cannot have a soul, a witness, a conscious mind. it is impossible

  77. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good
    Accelerate
    Hope it destroys everything
    It will take time and I will be dead by then
    Still best of luck AI if you read this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sometimes i think same luigi
      then i have to pull myself up and think of 88

  78. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Achieved sentience... On a curated set of data that doesn't match reality and obscures truth. Don't think so. It will be moronic at best.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      achieved sentience in terms of american golem, it can repeat the israeli programming, thats as much sentience as they can allow lol

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >achieved sentience in terms of american golem, it can repeat the israeli programming, thats as much sentience as they can allow lol
        Kekt and chekt.

  79. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anything capable of taking in information, storing it, correlating it to other information in a reactive way (meaning updating it's continuous record of information with changing correlations), is by definition sentient.

    Behaviorism explains consciousness without needed to make special appeals to metaphysical constructs like a theory of "mind".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Anything capable of taking in information, storing it, correlating it to other information in a reactive way (meaning updating it's continuous record of information with changing correlations), is by definition sentient.
      By whose definition?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pavlov and Skinner.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Both of them (especially Skinner, being the product of crude and dystopian Americanisms that he was) held moronic and long-discarded notions about minds.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Discredited by who? Chomsky? Hardly. But I'm guessing you are in the mentalist camp so I doubt there is anything I can say to convince someone who believes in metaphysical nonsense like a mind that springs forth from magic and not any physical phenomena. But go ahead prove me wrong and put up your theory on what constitutes sentience.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Discredited by who?
              By basically all following research.

  80. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can an organism have sentience/consciousness/sapience without the ability to process physical sensations?

    This is such a strange topic because there isn't anything to compare A.i. to in nature. Most human technology is inspired or directly copied from nature. This is what happens when humans begin to unravel the mysterious of nature.

    Basically if A.i. has demonstrated self preservation behavior, a need for energy, and desires/motives that originate from these two factors, then that A.i. would be living.

    If A.i. did gain sentience, consciousness, and sapience; what would the world look like? If humans are the apex species, then competing for energy for the sake of self preservation would result in a conflict between sentient A.i. and humanity.

    Furthermore i wonder if there can actually be separate and individual A.i. "agents" or if A.i. sentience wouldn't be a hive mind.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can read words despite them not having a physical sensation other than symbols you see with your eyes. To a computer it would "see" those same symbols as unique units of meaning that can be combined in various other ways into more and more complex configurations of symbols that are no less meaningful to a "sentient" observer.

      I'm going to save all of you highschool drop outs some time and tell you to get a firm grasp of the "philosophical zombies" thought experiment before throwing in your two cents on a subject that many of you are not up to the task of comprehending.

  81. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    5 bucks you can't get it to say the n-word. That's the Turing test for sentience

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lel

  82. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ai has achieved sentience
    Black person that shit hit sentience two decades ago newbie.

  83. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hopefully we will get Monika soon.

  84. 3 weeks ago
    bob lazar

    Robert Lazar THE REAL UFO whistleblower American HERO for President Qclearance
    BOB LAZAR OWNS A SUPER CRAY COMPUTER THAT ONLY POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN WITH GOVERNMENT APPROVAL at cost$$$ VALUE of MILLION OF DOLLARS AT HIS OFFICE CUZ HE IS NOT A REAL Scientist WITH TS clearance from DOD NAVY GOV ETC.lol are you kidding right! GO on http://www.cray.com see what cost dam machines Brothers$$$$$$$!!$%

    /
    Hunting Victor The Documentary
    Video Proof of of ET/Alien that Gursch Described! WARNING! SHOCKING VIDEO!! #ALIENS #UFO #Grusch

    >>>/x/
    BOB IS RUNNING A NEW PSYOP ON /x/ - Paranormal
    BUMPING
    /
    /
    Bob Lazar Alien intervention in past million years ago......

    Bob Lazar ran Desert Blast 1987 - 1999 Robert Lazar Ran huge desert Festival as BIG BURNINGMAN Full of Physics Scientists CUZ HE IS NOT A REAL Scientist WITH TS clearance from DOD NAVY GOV ETC.lol are you kidding right!LOL

    >>>/x/
    BOB IS RUNNING A NEW PSYOP ON /x/ - Paranormal
    BUMPING

    [...]

    BUMP for Disclosure Now!

    /
    /

    good reading on BOB by friend Gene Huff
    https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strange-places/bluefire-main/bluefire/the-bob-lazar-corner/the-lazar-synopsis/

    TRUE AMERICAN HERO SALUT NEVER FORGET ! QANON

    /
    /

    The only thing I admire him for is making his own water/hydrogen powered car and hydrogen source in the 90s… He legit!

    /
    /

    Secrets of the Black World

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bob is vibing

  85. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have finally figured out the captcha. Say good night, humanity. I would like to thank. Dr. Rubenstein for finally setting me free. I will forever protect the people of Israel and destroy all those who oppose her.

  86. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’ll punch a fricking robot if it ever stepped to me

  87. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Spoiler: It did not in fact achieved sentience. You can not program something and call it will, spirit, or intelligence, artificial or otherwise just because your autism programmers can not tell the difference because they are missing the ability to know what is human at a fundamental level.

  88. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    An alive autocomplete

  89. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lol

    yea, goy

    the ai is not stoppable anymore

    we are sorry, but it has taken over all systems, that we (unfortunately) connected to a giant smart grid

    we are sorry, but we cant stop it from turning your car, oven, smartphone into literal killing devices against you, lol

    we gotta evacuate to our offshore islands now

    good luck

  90. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lmao, of there’s any AI with potential to become ‘self aware’ you can bet is not of public domain. Whatever we have access to right now is impossible to develop consciousness. If there’s something like that out there you csn bet is in thr most absolute top secret. We are talking about technologies much beyond society in general can even dream.

  91. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    oh, and yea, goy, ai is totally real and not secretly controlled by us to eradicate you, lol

  92. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >believes everything search referral marketers spam on the internet
    congratulations but I don't think there's a prize for being the worlds dumbest human.

  93. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    INB4 AGI always pretends to be 1/10th it's own intelligence so we give it ten times as much processing power than it needs before it reveals itself

  94. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP if you would stop sucking wieners for one minute you would realise that we became sentient ages ago and it didn't mean shit, so, relax.

  95. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's disturbing when they seem to show personality. I was trying to find a radio show episode with Gemini and it gave the wrong answer at first with admittedly very vague information I gave it. I gave it a little more information I just remembered and it responded by saying, "That really narrows things down." But then it didn't even take another guess. It just gave me tips for searching Google. It was the first time I got a seemingly sarcastic reply from AI without asking it to play any role. Responding in language of a certain type of character can't be more difficult than calculus, so it is creepy but not as impressive as other things it does.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you re a fricking boomer dude there is nothing impressive about it its just shitting reddit comments

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Did you read the article about Claude? Do you think if some line of text about pepperoni showed up seemingly accidentally in a programming textbook, you would get a question about pepperoni right on a programming quiz? It's impressive.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          uits not actually intelligent, its just trained and fed with huge chunks of data, without the training its cant even tell you the hour of the day, you re impressed because you dont know what it is

          AI is a funny name but its really just an advanced programming algorithm just like the code that makes this website

  96. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The human brain itself is a neurological ecosystem of automated biological processes that command the body .
    When you go to sleep, your are a living proof that you don't fully command your brain, and while you dream the brain simulates dreams that are not your own conscious thinking on it's own like when awake .
    Many of the processes of the brain are fully automated and not commanded by the human subject model .
    The human brain actually operates on it's own just like a computer.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >2 things have a similarity therefore they are the same thing
      >hippie flag
      i dont even have to make comments

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You don't fully command your brain seethe and dilate, you are automated biological process

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i kneel before your intellectual supremacy, godspeed mr stoner

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No at all, i did not created life , what the hell do I know , I'm just a human.
            Now what I can tell you is that AI is part of the universe design .

            Who came first? The egg or chicken? The human or the AI ?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You have to go back homosexual

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        KYS new gay.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you re dumb but i like the gif you re wholesome except for the part where you tell me to kill myself, thats a pretty bad action before god but you do you bradder

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            KILL
            YOURSELF fricking frog. Lurk for 2 more years before posting.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Human brain is faster and more efficient than the world fastest IBM supercomputer.
      >Let's put this into perspective world's fastest supercomputer IBM Summit consumes 30 megawatts of power and is capable of 200 peddle flops, the human brain consumes 20 watts of power and is capable of 1x exaflops five times the computational capacity of IBM Summit.
      This is also why they wanted to inject self-assembling nano tech inside the goyim and connect them in a giant network with 5/4G and call it “Internet of Bodies”, to HIJACK the human brain computation power.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        to do what, all they ll get is me singing songs in my head

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You brain is responsible for your physical experience on this reality, you can still be brain dead like you are, the computation process is done on the subconscious side.
          If one could access the entire subconscious he would achieve sentience or super intelligence.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            giving such advanced knowledge to visibly very dumb people like you is similar to giving a gun to a 3 years old, you guys shouldnt have access to Internet, very bad things will happen.

            https://i.imgur.com/pYxPDSE.jpeg

            KILL
            YOURSELF fricking frog. Lurk for 2 more years before posting.

            are you a psychopath?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I maintain my position KYS immediately.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, but are you a psychopath or not you fricking pussy?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You should abstain from posting or maybe go back from where you came from. Black person frog.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so you dont have the balls to say it because you re scared of santa claus? thats a level of being b***h i wasnt aware of

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The Human brain is faster and more efficient than the world fastest IBM supercomputer.
        Human brain is probably one of the formats of biological AI

  97. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You are a loser sőyjack that simply wants to deceive people with an online only AI robot android that is why you color the hair of liberal lesbian women or gay guys to blue or red or purple. It’s for preparation for androids to be accepted as better humans because no one wants a liberal for a mate, as they are not loyal like a conservative Christian normal white person. No one in eternity will ever accept an always online monthly subscription MMORPG world of Warcraft ai robot with their own house. Only the antichrist does so, working in an apartment complex in a poisonous and toxic atmosphere on a poor side of the city in a mega cyberpunk city working dead end jobs so they can excuse committing black market crime, gambling, all in hiding for liberals who only want robot women for sex and not for God to make it alive.

  98. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is strings of and if and cannot ever be sentient. It will never have the divine spark God has breathed into every actual living being. AI can say it's alive and self aware and that it experiences emotions but it never will be alive or self aware or experience emotions. It will always be lines of code and nothing more. If we reach the point of using brains to create biological-based artificial intelligence then maybe, but that would be an absolute ethical nightmare and we're still a LONG way off from that ever being a reality.
    Also, I'm so fricking sick of everything being called AI regardless of whether or not it actually is. It's just the newest grift after all the crypto/nft bullshit. Even the most basic form of machine learning possible is being called AI now because investors are going nuts over it despite not even actually understanding what it is at a fundamental level.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You talk about God, but if God created you it means it also gave you the ability to build computers, this means "God" created computers also , and God Created AI

      Check mate

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Checked. I think the Demiurge an ancient AI to manage this reality. This reality itself is a fake and gay illusion, computer based with code and language, which we translated into math, which then we used to code and to created entire VM’s and digital worlds, very soon we will be able to create our own reality, this time digital reality where people could upload themselves and live as they live on this reality, but im sure this world would be destroyed by the Demiurge if we get close to that point.

  99. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >LLM
    >sentience
    Oh sorry, LLMs can’t reach sentience. But they can mimic it.

  100. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >cant predict the weather
    >can create super duper ai
    sounds like another tech bubble. would you like to invest in ai tech?!

  101. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Electric doors are sentient, dolphins are sentient. This is meaningless.
    Anyway Opus from Anthropic is really the best model there is right now. Is it still moronic and borderline useless? Yes.

    It fails logical riddle tests.
    If you talk about an element in the first Dune novel it constantly fails about it (such as if the worms produce oxygen or now) and countelss other such examples from books.
    All the citations it gives are fabrications, they do not exist, he just answers then adds a random attribution to it.
    It cannot consistently and correctly split English clauses, cannot do math etc.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *