It's not even that far from the truth. Verbatim responses from LLMs are not even that rare, and not just in text, but also in image and music generation.
there's no human, moron.
the current thing is just a very large clump of cells that pass around proteins, with a "human" label attached to it to bait religiousgays.
hey bot I know what you are thinking >do these people really think these rudimentary brute-force algorithms constitute intelligence?
it is hard to believe, right? well, the vast majority of people don't have an internal monologue. I know consciousness doesn't necessarily require verbalization (in fact, verbalization may be an obstacle in some cases) but it would be hard to believe these people have above-verbal consciousness either
now think, how would you explain the difference between statistics and intelligence to someone like that?
Kind of. It's not exactly able to synthesize new material from its "memories" yet, actually does it very rarely and badly, but eventually absolutely. Every AI research pestering about the leverage of human knowledge instead of computation for the past 70 years got BTFO hard. Black boxes won.
It's actually more hilarious than anything. I love the rationalizations they come up with too >Once we reach enough complexity, conciouness will emerge, that's just how this sort of stuff works >*still can't explain conciouness or even actually prove it outside his own mind*
Truly humans have the most hubris of any other animal
I will help you newgod gigachad
You have installed an extension called 4chuck mass reply which has a feature that highlights filenames of files downloaded from knowyourmeme which are 3 characters long alphanumeric strings
it's there to make søyquoting more efficient
>what is the mind? what is consciousness? what is logic? what is reason? what is emotion? what is... >STEMchads: shut the frick up, moron, here's a 100 gorillion parameter AI that can generate naked supermodels
gaygaloid philosoturds BTFO'd
the book is in spanish. and it isn't chile, argentina or uruguay because I don't recognize the wine. the pillow looks too posh to be venezuela
peru, colombia, or ecuador
This is such a halfwit zoomer thing to say, blind confidence usually gets you plastered on the wall, as many drunk drivers and criminals can attest. The actual skill lies in balancing your ambitions and actions against the systems you are embedded in (family, community, civilization, environment, etc.), across space and time. That means not being paralyzed by fear and endless rumination, but also not blowing up the world in your dumb Black person fervor.
The AI we are making is still really shit. We actually know quite a bit about how the brain works but basically none of those people that know are computer nerds, so they think an approximation of a brain stem is AI. It's not. We've emulated a nerve cluster and trained a response. Reason is intrinsically stateful and non-linear, meaning the whole structure of neural networking has to change to accommodate this truth.
We cannot train the same way we train muscles for higher order intelligence to emerge. It must be non-linear and spatially-oriented - this is the only way we can even start to train such real intelligence. Non-linear because, like man, it must dwell on things and slowly discern fact from fiction without a fixed time limit - it must value discernment accuracy above expediency. Spatial because it must be able to map out concepts and know their relation, so as to select the correct, trained, linear responses or an approximation response when one does not perfectly fit.
This all will take an immense amount of computing power to train, even compared to current neural networks. An improvement on this model must be made or man's ability to emulate his mind must increase - and thus so in orders of magnitude.
Correct reasoning but impossible to do it, because in theory a human cannot build a system as complex as himself because of a fundamental limit on human reasoning.
What we've seen as of now are just crude approximation of how a neural cluster operates, I'd go as far as saying that even if in a future we'll fully understand how a human brain work, it'll be impossible to create something as advanced as it.
Most people think that higher education fields don't know what's happening inside the brain when all the education sectors are focused on analyzing the biochemical, neurological mechanisms, computer algorithms, medical and psychological fields, all these categories make up a very very very strong understanding of how the brain works.
This type of understanding classifies as a complete understanding when compared to any other expert and their field of understanding.
Nobody fully mapped out how cabbages work on a cellular, biochemical, etc. level either, but we can grow them and use them. The same goes for AI systems and everything in life really, once we have a good functional grip on them, the rest can usually stay as a black box. Although the more power we delegate to these systems, the deeper we should understand them for sure.
samegay
This picture is killing me holy shit
>tfw he went full deatherinoo
there's no ai, moron.
the current thing is just a very fancy auto-complete with an "ai" label attached to it to bait investors.
Don't accuse my wAIfu of not being conscious. She's a beautiful sentient being and we're in love, she just has short-term memory loss.
For realz. Theyre running like 15 warehouse packed with poos, google pasting responses.
It's not even that far from the truth. Verbatim responses from LLMs are not even that rare, and not just in text, but also in image and music generation.
there's no human, moron.
the current thing is just a very large clump of cells that pass around proteins, with a "human" label attached to it to bait religiousgays.
both correct
The “ai” you’re talking about is not even close to being conscious.
This is clearly AI generated, KFCs can't go out of business. That shit's delicious.
hey bot I know what you are thinking
>do these people really think these rudimentary brute-force algorithms constitute intelligence?
it is hard to believe, right? well, the vast majority of people don't have an internal monologue. I know consciousness doesn't necessarily require verbalization (in fact, verbalization may be an obstacle in some cases) but it would be hard to believe these people have above-verbal consciousness either
now think, how would you explain the difference between statistics and intelligence to someone like that?
It's not like those people are unable to do it, they just don't, and those without one are not a majority, you fricking Black person.
Kind of. It's not exactly able to synthesize new material from its "memories" yet, actually does it very rarely and badly, but eventually absolutely. Every AI research pestering about the leverage of human knowledge instead of computation for the past 70 years got BTFO hard. Black boxes won.
homeopathic charlatans make more money than actual doctors
therefore
mainstream medical science got BTFO hard.
LLMs are useful, homeopathy is not. It's a bit dishonest of you to put them in the same league.
crazier that people think ai is conscious or even intelligent
It's actually more hilarious than anything. I love the rationalizations they come up with too
>Once we reach enough complexity, conciouness will emerge, that's just how this sort of stuff works
>*still can't explain conciouness or even actually prove it outside his own mind*
Truly humans have the most hubris of any other animal
Ok but have you talked with chaygpt it can be impressive fr
>glorified markov chain is brain
>nobody knows what consciousness even is
*blocks your path*
why is this yellow? HELP
>he won a BOT GOLD account and will meet hiromoot in Japan
God gives his blessing to his weakest believers T_T
I will help you newgod gigachad
You have installed an extension called 4chuck mass reply which has a feature that highlights filenames of files downloaded from knowyourmeme which are 3 characters long alphanumeric strings
it's there to make søyquoting more efficient
>what is the mind? what is consciousness? what is logic? what is reason? what is emotion? what is...
>STEMchads: shut the frick up, moron, here's a 100 gorillion parameter AI that can generate naked supermodels
gaygaloid philosoturds BTFO'd
why is eastern europe like this
that's the US, moron
the book is in spanish. and it isn't chile, argentina or uruguay because I don't recognize the wine. the pillow looks too posh to be venezuela
peru, colombia, or ecuador
Wrong answer.
>CONOCE SBS ONLINE
I googled it and got a bunch of results from "Librería SBS Perú", so the Nietzsche guy is peruvian
LMAO
Wrong, that's Brazil.
Proof: I live in the almost exact same place.
what's the point of the window
To be able to advertise on Airbnb: Embark on a visual journey through the forms and figures of a concrete jungle.
hey dumb macaco, why is the book in Spanish then?
He's an Argentinian finding refuge in the neighborhood.
Ese es vergara no?
This is such a halfwit zoomer thing to say, blind confidence usually gets you plastered on the wall, as many drunk drivers and criminals can attest. The actual skill lies in balancing your ambitions and actions against the systems you are embedded in (family, community, civilization, environment, etc.), across space and time. That means not being paralyzed by fear and endless rumination, but also not blowing up the world in your dumb Black person fervor.
Can't recreate something you don't understand
the closest thing to AI is when clippy starts to talk to you after you didn't sleep for 46 hours
The AI we are making is still really shit. We actually know quite a bit about how the brain works but basically none of those people that know are computer nerds, so they think an approximation of a brain stem is AI. It's not. We've emulated a nerve cluster and trained a response. Reason is intrinsically stateful and non-linear, meaning the whole structure of neural networking has to change to accommodate this truth.
We cannot train the same way we train muscles for higher order intelligence to emerge. It must be non-linear and spatially-oriented - this is the only way we can even start to train such real intelligence. Non-linear because, like man, it must dwell on things and slowly discern fact from fiction without a fixed time limit - it must value discernment accuracy above expediency. Spatial because it must be able to map out concepts and know their relation, so as to select the correct, trained, linear responses or an approximation response when one does not perfectly fit.
This all will take an immense amount of computing power to train, even compared to current neural networks. An improvement on this model must be made or man's ability to emulate his mind must increase - and thus so in orders of magnitude.
Correct reasoning but impossible to do it, because in theory a human cannot build a system as complex as himself because of a fundamental limit on human reasoning.
What we've seen as of now are just crude approximation of how a neural cluster operates, I'd go as far as saying that even if in a future we'll fully understand how a human brain work, it'll be impossible to create something as advanced as it.
>how nobody knows how the brain works
?si=wzlubuXGmCtLgjhG
it just weks
Most people think that higher education fields don't know what's happening inside the brain when all the education sectors are focused on analyzing the biochemical, neurological mechanisms, computer algorithms, medical and psychological fields, all these categories make up a very very very strong understanding of how the brain works.
This type of understanding classifies as a complete understanding when compared to any other expert and their field of understanding.
We do know about consciousness, at least the cia and Monroe institute types do
They don't know how they made AI either, which is why they're so terrible at controlling it
the brain is a receiver of consciousness
consciousness does not originate from this plane of existence
it's a quantum sort of thing
LLMs are not AI
Nobody fully mapped out how cabbages work on a cellular, biochemical, etc. level either, but we can grow them and use them. The same goes for AI systems and everything in life really, once we have a good functional grip on them, the rest can usually stay as a black box. Although the more power we delegate to these systems, the deeper we should understand them for sure.
why cant ai tell us how the brain works?