I'm not really sure what you're trying to get at. What specifically did you want to discuss?
The question you asked is better answered by yourself. I'd rather not tell you what to care about. Are you asking me for my perspective on it or what?
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's referring to your earlier post > I'd honestly rather see
Why does anyone care what you'd rather see? They don't even know you. You're never going to stop people from basketweaving like that
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Why does anyone care what you'd rather see?
I guess I'd have to ask you. You're interested in it, to the point you're asking about it. Most people that come to these places do so to read posts like these ones and have interactions like this.
>They don't even know you.
I don't see the significance of that. One of the benefits of this place is seeing what was written without worrying about who wrote it. Posts stand on their own merit. Which is nice in my opinion.
>You're never going to stop people from basketweaving like that
I wouldn't want to. On this site, we share space with each other, despite our differences. Just because I don't like how people act doesn't mean I'm going to make efforts to stop them. Likewise they're not going to do that to me or you. This place is very open to the public.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Knowing you doesen't require anyone to know your name or where you live. It's something that's implied from the contents of your comment. Currently what I'm seeing is a homosexual. As long as you're fine not having an impact, keep doing what your doing.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Knowing you doesen't require anyone to know your name or where you live. It's something that's implied from the contents of your comment.
That doesn't make a lot of sense. Casting assumptions on identity based on the content of a post sounds silly considering each post does stand on its own. Trying to tie them together by reply chain or even style is no guarantee either. You see people make that mistake a lot.
>Currently what I'm seeing is a homosexual.
Not sure why you feel that way.
You've been goading for a bit so I'm guessing something is wrong on your end. Want to talk about it?
>As long as you're fine not having an impact, keep doing what your doing.
Depends on how you mean. Obviously I'm impacting you, albeit unintentionally.
We're both just posting as we do. If you're trying to imply anyone here has any sway you'll be disappointed to find out it's never the case. People try a lot, but good luck trying to sway something so large and open.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Smarm isn't new or special, I can do it too
1 month ago
Anonymous
I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean gathering swarms of people to make posts trying to sway the opinion here, that never works. We have that kind of event each generation, if not annually for some boards.
You're welcome to try, but ultimately you're screaming at people who couldn't care less about having their mind changed.
What specifically would you want to see changed?
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're never going to goad me into giving a rational, useful response. This isn't ycombinator or reddit
1 month ago
Anonymous
I'm under the impression you're goading, but I don't know why you think I am.
If you don't want to talk to me, you don't have to, but because of what I said, I was under the impression you were looking to talk.
It's not debate club, I'm not expecting some rational or useful response, just a real one.
Again if you don't want to, nobody is pressuring you to. It's just an offer.
1 month ago
Anonymous
It was just an odd comment to make if you're not looking to change anything with it. Maybe if you're looking to waste time, but I'm not going to guess your motives. Keep doing whatever you feel like is worth doing.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Maybe if you're looking to waste time
The entire point of this place is to pass time talking to each other, so yeah more or less.
You're acting as if every comment has to be of substance, which is odd since you're complaining about places like reddit and hackernews. But when someone makes an offhanded comment just to bump the thread you get weird about it.
The entire reply chain is odd and ironic. I don't get it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Much like someone talking to a wall in the middle of the street, it shouldn't be strange for people to ask what the point is. I already told you it's fine if you're literally wasting time, know it and are fine with it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Much like someone talking to a wall in the middle of the street, it shouldn't be strange for people to ask what the point is.
I guess I'll bite. What's your reason for doing it? I think I already gave mine after you asked me.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Besides concern for a passerby? There's really no better way to keep the thread alive than someone compelled to answer you every few minutes. Moaning AI is an idea everybody needs in their head
1 month ago
Anonymous
Unfortunately we've littered the thread with meta posts.
RVC V2 can do moans but it's more of a voice changer than a TTS. So you'd have to have a reference. The good part is that You can use male voice or female voices for this.
You could try Tortoise+RVC but RVC is only as good as the provided voice because it's a voice changer.
So if it's a poor AI generated moan of a man generated by tortoise put into RVC V2 it wouod become a poor AI generated moan of an anime girl. Well because it's a voice changer duh.
So it's garbage in garbage out.
Good luck Anon. Don't fall for the RVC scams because it's free open source on GitHub. Just Google RVC V2 for it's GitHub
>go to porn hub and grab a lot of videos >edit them and cut the moans, add tags >pass the moans tru rcv so you have only 1 voice >train ai
I mean how many variation of moans can exist?, I bet around 1000 samples should do the trick
You can train one for 70-120k dolars i guess
I bet the existing tools like TorToiSe could do this but I'd also like to know.
Stupid tranime poster.
anime website
Italian spaghetti mangling site
I think I'd honestly rather see people spamming "bump" than doing charades like this.
>people
How do you know we're not all just one person?
I'm saying "people" generally, as in people who post on this site. Whether those one specifically are the same person or not doesn't change anything.
Tell me, why do I care again?
Anon, I don't even know who you are.
Right?
I'm not really sure what you're trying to get at. What specifically did you want to discuss?
The question you asked is better answered by yourself. I'd rather not tell you what to care about. Are you asking me for my perspective on it or what?
It's referring to your earlier post
> I'd honestly rather see
Why does anyone care what you'd rather see? They don't even know you. You're never going to stop people from basketweaving like that
>Why does anyone care what you'd rather see?
I guess I'd have to ask you. You're interested in it, to the point you're asking about it. Most people that come to these places do so to read posts like these ones and have interactions like this.
>They don't even know you.
I don't see the significance of that. One of the benefits of this place is seeing what was written without worrying about who wrote it. Posts stand on their own merit. Which is nice in my opinion.
>You're never going to stop people from basketweaving like that
I wouldn't want to. On this site, we share space with each other, despite our differences. Just because I don't like how people act doesn't mean I'm going to make efforts to stop them. Likewise they're not going to do that to me or you. This place is very open to the public.
Knowing you doesen't require anyone to know your name or where you live. It's something that's implied from the contents of your comment. Currently what I'm seeing is a homosexual. As long as you're fine not having an impact, keep doing what your doing.
>Knowing you doesen't require anyone to know your name or where you live. It's something that's implied from the contents of your comment.
That doesn't make a lot of sense. Casting assumptions on identity based on the content of a post sounds silly considering each post does stand on its own. Trying to tie them together by reply chain or even style is no guarantee either. You see people make that mistake a lot.
>Currently what I'm seeing is a homosexual.
Not sure why you feel that way.
You've been goading for a bit so I'm guessing something is wrong on your end. Want to talk about it?
>As long as you're fine not having an impact, keep doing what your doing.
Depends on how you mean. Obviously I'm impacting you, albeit unintentionally.
We're both just posting as we do. If you're trying to imply anyone here has any sway you'll be disappointed to find out it's never the case. People try a lot, but good luck trying to sway something so large and open.
Smarm isn't new or special, I can do it too
I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean gathering swarms of people to make posts trying to sway the opinion here, that never works. We have that kind of event each generation, if not annually for some boards.
You're welcome to try, but ultimately you're screaming at people who couldn't care less about having their mind changed.
What specifically would you want to see changed?
You're never going to goad me into giving a rational, useful response. This isn't ycombinator or reddit
I'm under the impression you're goading, but I don't know why you think I am.
If you don't want to talk to me, you don't have to, but because of what I said, I was under the impression you were looking to talk.
It's not debate club, I'm not expecting some rational or useful response, just a real one.
Again if you don't want to, nobody is pressuring you to. It's just an offer.
It was just an odd comment to make if you're not looking to change anything with it. Maybe if you're looking to waste time, but I'm not going to guess your motives. Keep doing whatever you feel like is worth doing.
>Maybe if you're looking to waste time
The entire point of this place is to pass time talking to each other, so yeah more or less.
You're acting as if every comment has to be of substance, which is odd since you're complaining about places like reddit and hackernews. But when someone makes an offhanded comment just to bump the thread you get weird about it.
The entire reply chain is odd and ironic. I don't get it.
Much like someone talking to a wall in the middle of the street, it shouldn't be strange for people to ask what the point is. I already told you it's fine if you're literally wasting time, know it and are fine with it.
>Much like someone talking to a wall in the middle of the street, it shouldn't be strange for people to ask what the point is.
I guess I'll bite. What's your reason for doing it? I think I already gave mine after you asked me.
Besides concern for a passerby? There's really no better way to keep the thread alive than someone compelled to answer you every few minutes. Moaning AI is an idea everybody needs in their head
Unfortunately we've littered the thread with meta posts.
With some tests it's possible but you'll have to cherrypick from quite many samples. It's more of a conversational AI
RVC V2 can do moans but it's more of a voice changer than a TTS. So you'd have to have a reference. The good part is that You can use male voice or female voices for this.
You could try Tortoise+RVC but RVC is only as good as the provided voice because it's a voice changer.
So if it's a poor AI generated moan of a man generated by tortoise put into RVC V2 it wouod become a poor AI generated moan of an anime girl. Well because it's a voice changer duh.
So it's garbage in garbage out.
Good luck Anon. Don't fall for the RVC scams because it's free open source on GitHub. Just Google RVC V2 for it's GitHub
That's a yawn, not a moan
I need a model for moans, yawns, and panting.
I know what my next side project will be.
Thanks anon.
/gif/
>go to porn hub and grab a lot of videos
>edit them and cut the moans, add tags
>pass the moans tru rcv so you have only 1 voice
>train ai
I mean how many variation of moans can exist?, I bet around 1000 samples should do the trick
I don't think it's the samplesize we're lacking, just someone with horsepower to do it