i would laugh hysterically at it. anyone besides me who watches me, a fat hairy man, get fricked in a gay porn is a gay so its hilarious to imagine getting to call people gays for watching fake porn of me.
>I probably wouldn't react.
You are just empty inside, but the moment all of your friends, coworkers, relatives will watch videos of you getting gangraped by 10 black men, you will have a nice day.
Only women treat their sexuality like its something sacret when in reality it's worthless that's why women cry about shit like this men don't and shouldn't give a shit when images like this are made about eomen therefore no laws will be made to prevent this.
I'd laugh. Maybe give criticisms.
But those are hetero-gangbangs so the equivalent would be me photoshopped in with a bunch of chicks all over me trying to steal my semen, which I hate.
I do. Should drawing a hyper realistic pornographic image of another be a criminal offense? No. It should only be a criminal offense if it is distributed and labeled as real.
If AI porn deserves jail time, then writing smut about someone without their consent should also get you arrested.
Would be funny to see a bunch of women get thrown in jail for their deranged BTS smutfics.
>Would be funny to see a bunch of women get thrown in jail for their deranged BTS smutfics
i live in south korea
south korea is the worlds first country to legally punish a writer for distributing processed child pornography made with ai
the agencies of kpop idol groups are now suing those who make such unethical facfics these days
and
entire watpad dom would be in jail
watpad was acquired by an ai-based it dinosaur in south korea
our government may regulate enormously
i really dislike our conservative social climate
It's okay asiaticanon, the Jap courts recently ruled that AI art based on and trained on the intellectual property of others doesn't violate copyright law, so AI produced media is going nowhere.
> caricatures? > jail it is!
why is everything considered to be assault nowadays - was reading an article published by my countries state media the other day where they claimed that not giving your wife money that you earned is somehow "financial violence"
To try and make minor irritations for women into jailable control methodologies. >Be woman >Don't like thing sometimes >make man stop thing by comparing thing to rape
making it of celebrities is less bad then making it with ordinary people because you can just assume it's fake with celebs a priori but not so much with your average guy or girl, specially as these get more realistic
>People could frame you for crimes
Depending on how good it gets, it may just become indistinguishable from reality. Then we have to assume everything we don't see in person is fake.
Is that really your father on video chat? Sure looks like and sounds like him. Why's he asking for $5000 all of the sudden? In Google Play cards.
I do think making ai porn of someone is probably wrong. However, this is not sexual assault and the person in the tweet is incredibly stupid. Don't you need physical contact with a person for it to be sexual assault? You can't AI your way into raping someone.
It's all fun and games until men start joining the party, all of their fan stories and fantasies were fine, but suddenly when the boys can make some fake images then shit has to become a legal matter.
I got fooled by A.I. porn for the first time a few dags ago. At one point I was like "the image quality is too full on to be photoshop" and checked the comments and it was AI. Later going back and checking the hands showed it was obvious. I asked the artist what he used and he said "I don't share my process" kek.
i am not a westerner
so i don't get it
do westerners really think taylor swift is sexy?
she's over six feet tall with barely any boobs
what's so sexy about her?
How does this negatively affect her? Its actually making her more popular outside of her music. Also tis AI generated meaning the nude Taylor Swift it not actually her fricking body, this is ridiculous.
jfc i get that this board hates women but you should all still get that this shit is creepy and weird right? i know most of you autists lack empathy but could you imagine if this was happening to someone you knew?
Thank you for being the only person in this thread that is reasonable. Like I said earlier, I don't think this constitutes sexual assault or rape but I do think it's wrong to make stuff like that.
People have been photoshopping wieners onto photos of dudes and chicks since the internet became a thing. If anything "revenge porn" should be legal too since they can't prove ai or a shooper didn't do it.
If it is of an actual person then it should be criminal in the same sense as revenge porn is. Also it should be considered defamation. But good luck catching anyone.
>defamation
You don't know what that word means israelite. If the creator claims what they made is ai then it isn't trying to "defame" anyone, it's no different than drawing shitty r34 of a celebrity in fricking mspaint.
It is different as it can be difficult to tell what's real.
Let's say i make a photorealistic image of you jerking off on your boss office and you get fired.
>Cool thing gets invented >People start using cool thing in funny ways >Suddenly strange things start happening with cool thing >A lot of specific outrages about cool thing >Normo's start comparing cool thing to raycissm, sexism, rape and Adolf Hitler >Normo's want restrictions on cool thing or the world may literally explode >Cool thing gets neutered
I keep getting reminded to that guy who claimed that if things like motorcycles were invented today they'd get banned in a week.
AI porn is sexual assault and is already illegal. They can jail you for revenge porn, AI porn is the same.
By the way swifties leaked the address of the dude who posted the pictures kek he's going to jail.
Isn't that the same as drawing porn of anyone ?
Imo as long as you keep it private I don't see any reasons to make it illegal since you're just making your imagination "real" but if you post it online then that's more or less just defamation.
This might be the last generation of celebrities as we know them.
Who the frick is gonna want to try and become famous in the upcoming age of AI where as soon you uploading a single video of yourself somewhere your entire identity is stolen and your face is used for porn videos
even just like politicians and local news sports anchors and real estate agents are gonna have to somehow all go anonymous and/or replace all humans in front of a camera by some hatsune miku bullshit
Because it's too good to be true. People, especially prostitutes, will always crave attention. Even if it means that your likeness will be instantly replicated and used by others. That gross, worthless celebrity culture will never end.
is it a crime when a student, bored in class, makes a drawing of their teacher in a manner that sexualizes or humiliates the teacher? is it a crime when cartoonists make provocative caricatures with explicit pornography (ie. like Charlie Hebdo does since 1970 and has complete media support for it)? No? Then why the frick should AI art with the same stuff be a crime?
oh my god, it totally should! thank you for posting it on the internet for all to see! please post more ai porn of her so i know what else they should go to jail for!
I don't think anyone really knows the answer to that
How would u react to AI porn of you ? Like in. Gay porno
i would laugh hysterically at it. anyone besides me who watches me, a fat hairy man, get fricked in a gay porn is a gay so its hilarious to imagine getting to call people gays for watching fake porn of me.
I probably wouldn't react. I would call posting on bot a better use of my time than caring about it
>I probably wouldn't react.
You are just empty inside, but the moment all of your friends, coworkers, relatives will watch videos of you getting gangraped by 10 black men, you will have a nice day.
Only women treat their sexuality like its something sacret when in reality it's worthless that's why women cry about shit like this men don't and shouldn't give a shit when images like this are made about eomen therefore no laws will be made to prevent this.
False equivalency I guess now we need to make some ai of taylor getting gang raped
Not sure what skin color has to do with it
>Hey, I saw you get gangraped
"It was AI"
>Lol
"Lol"
SUCH TRAUMA WOOOOOOOOOOW
I'd laugh. Maybe give criticisms.
But those are hetero-gangbangs so the equivalent would be me photoshopped in with a bunch of chicks all over me trying to steal my semen, which I hate.
I definitely know the answer to that: frick no.
If you even countenance that this should be a crime, you need to have a nice day NOW.
I think my problem with ai art is the creators.
The stuff that go viral are famous guys that are in pics that are weird or funny like . For female celebs 90% of it is lust bait or straight up porn.
I do. Should drawing a hyper realistic pornographic image of another be a criminal offense? No. It should only be a criminal offense if it is distributed and labeled as real.
wait till they find out she likes INDIAN MEN............
If AI porn deserves jail time, then writing smut about someone without their consent should also get you arrested.
Would be funny to see a bunch of women get thrown in jail for their deranged BTS smutfics.
entire watpad dom would be in jail
>Would be funny to see a bunch of women get thrown in jail for their deranged BTS smutfics
i live in south korea
south korea is the worlds first country to legally punish a writer for distributing processed child pornography made with ai
the agencies of kpop idol groups are now suing those who make such unethical facfics these days
and
watpad was acquired by an ai-based it dinosaur in south korea
our government may regulate enormously
i really dislike our conservative social climate
It's okay asiaticanon, the Jap courts recently ruled that AI art based on and trained on the intellectual property of others doesn't violate copyright law, so AI produced media is going nowhere.
We long ago passed the point where fan fic and drawings send people to jail. It's fricking moronic.
> caricatures?
> jail it is!
why is everything considered to be assault nowadays - was reading an article published by my countries state media the other day where they claimed that not giving your wife money that you earned is somehow "financial violence"
hue, welcome to the jungle
To try and make minor irritations for women into jailable control methodologies.
>Be woman
>Don't like thing sometimes
>make man stop thing by comparing thing to rape
I wonder if normgroid men will ever wake up. Doesn't matter to me at this point, I've gotten past the point of having hope for society
it shouldn't be, but it will be
good luck enforcing it though
making it of celebrities is less bad then making it with ordinary people because you can just assume it's fake with celebs a priori but not so much with your average guy or girl, specially as these get more realistic
I mean, maybe basic deep fakes yea
But shit like in the op is obviously fake even with some randos face instead oglf Taylor's
Is there an Imgur gallery of those? It's kinda based.
Porn isnt the real problem. People could frame you for crimes
>People could frame you for crimes
Depending on how good it gets, it may just become indistinguishable from reality. Then we have to assume everything we don't see in person is fake.
Is that really your father on video chat? Sure looks like and sounds like him. Why's he asking for $5000 all of the sudden? In Google Play cards.
No women deserve it for being prostitutes
>No women deserve it
Agreed.
Same goes for men of course.
I can't wait until ppl start making AI generated images of celebrities committing crimes.
Wonder if we well see AI generated "Epstein cannibal orgies" with a bunch of A listers eating from a roasted human corpse
>/b/ renders leaking over to black normie twitter
das it mane
I do think making ai porn of someone is probably wrong. However, this is not sexual assault and the person in the tweet is incredibly stupid. Don't you need physical contact with a person for it to be sexual assault? You can't AI your way into raping someone.
>drawing pictures of celebrities is wrong
How have we descended to this point as a culture.
I hate ai porn too. Respect hentai artists please
It's all fun and games until men start joining the party, all of their fan stories and fantasies were fine, but suddenly when the boys can make some fake images then shit has to become a legal matter.
How are they making these, like which ai to be exact. These are fricking gold I haven't smiled in ages
stable diffusion loras and training.
I got fooled by A.I. porn for the first time a few dags ago. At one point I was like "the image quality is too full on to be photoshop" and checked the comments and it was AI. Later going back and checking the hands showed it was obvious. I asked the artist what he used and he said "I don't share my process" kek.
Is there a tutorial to set these up? Also thanks for telling me
You are too stupid for it, don't even try.
>You are too stupid for it, don't even try.
There are step-by-step tutorials for literal morons. Like actually brain damaged individuals
Just send it dude. Why you gotta be so mean m8
US courts have ruled multiple times that this sort of thing is legal.
more Taylor Swift AI Porn please
Nobody's posting a gallery, I've already asked.
i am not a westerner
so i don't get it
do westerners really think taylor swift is sexy?
she's over six feet tall with barely any boobs
what's so sexy about her?
She has small tity nordic tomboy phenotype. BOT has been full of Taylor swift goon threads since 2009
Legal speaking, how is it any different than photoshopping a celebrity's face onto a porn star?
Few understand how weird things are going to be
Black person women posting on the internet should be regarded as terrorism punishable by jail time idgaf
This so much. They have the worst fricking takes on everything yet moronic white women and gays eat their shit up like feral hogs.
I would really like to see a tutorial on these
She is royght, you know?
>white women will argue that: using your imagination to have a dream of a public figure is criminal in nature
How does this negatively affect her? Its actually making her more popular outside of her music. Also tis AI generated meaning the nude Taylor Swift it not actually her fricking body, this is ridiculous.
hoping so hard we get some ones with different fetishes in them, some bdsm ones would be so fricking hot.
jfc i get that this board hates women but you should all still get that this shit is creepy and weird right? i know most of you autists lack empathy but could you imagine if this was happening to someone you knew?
Did you know it has been possible for the past 2000 years to draw porn of someone? You don't need an AI
Its not your naked body dumbass, its like accusing me of child porn just because I photoshopped a kid's head on a nude stick figure I made in paint.
>creepy
Oh no. Is someone being creepy on BOT? You better tell them about it. You're helping.
celebrities are not real people.
They are to be abused for our entertainment.
Thank you for being the only person in this thread that is reasonable. Like I said earlier, I don't think this constitutes sexual assault or rape but I do think it's wrong to make stuff like that.
>this shit is creepy and weird
>muh foids
>muh feels
Kys
People have been photoshopping wieners onto photos of dudes and chicks since the internet became a thing. If anything "revenge porn" should be legal too since they can't prove ai or a shooper didn't do it.
If it is of an actual person then it should be criminal in the same sense as revenge porn is. Also it should be considered defamation. But good luck catching anyone.
>defamation
You don't know what that word means israelite. If the creator claims what they made is ai then it isn't trying to "defame" anyone, it's no different than drawing shitty r34 of a celebrity in fricking mspaint.
It is different as it can be difficult to tell what's real.
Let's say i make a photorealistic image of you jerking off on your boss office and you get fired.
This shit will go to the Supreme court one day. And celebrities will cry
>Cool thing gets invented
>People start using cool thing in funny ways
>Suddenly strange things start happening with cool thing
>A lot of specific outrages about cool thing
>Normo's start comparing cool thing to raycissm, sexism, rape and Adolf Hitler
>Normo's want restrictions on cool thing or the world may literally explode
>Cool thing gets neutered
I keep getting reminded to that guy who claimed that if things like motorcycles were invented today they'd get banned in a week.
I hate the fact that half of the internet is gonna be AI generated shit in a few years.
public images are for public use
simple as that
AI porn is sexual assault and is already illegal. They can jail you for revenge porn, AI porn is the same.
By the way swifties leaked the address of the dude who posted the pictures kek he's going to jail.
you're unwell
Isn't that the same as drawing porn of anyone ?
Imo as long as you keep it private I don't see any reasons to make it illegal since you're just making your imagination "real" but if you post it online then that's more or less just defamation.
It shouldn't be illegal even if you share it
>drawings of celebrities is defamation
No it's not
This might be the last generation of celebrities as we know them.
Who the frick is gonna want to try and become famous in the upcoming age of AI where as soon you uploading a single video of yourself somewhere your entire identity is stolen and your face is used for porn videos
even just like politicians and local news sports anchors and real estate agents are gonna have to somehow all go anonymous and/or replace all humans in front of a camera by some hatsune miku bullshit
this is the future we chose
The future you describe would be a utopia. It will never happen.
>The future you describe would be a utopia. It will never happen.
Why not? Is it gonna be made illegal?
Even if it's illegal people are still gonna do it.
Because it's too good to be true. People, especially prostitutes, will always crave attention. Even if it means that your likeness will be instantly replicated and used by others. That gross, worthless celebrity culture will never end.
is it a crime when a student, bored in class, makes a drawing of their teacher in a manner that sexualizes or humiliates the teacher? is it a crime when cartoonists make provocative caricatures with explicit pornography (ie. like Charlie Hebdo does since 1970 and has complete media support for it)? No? Then why the frick should AI art with the same stuff be a crime?
Because it's going to get to a point where it's indistinguishable from real photos. Which can then be used to tarnish someone's reputation
as if art ever needed to be realistic to hurt someone's reputation
Depends on whether it would be considered as cyberbullying or not.
oh my god, it totally should! thank you for posting it on the internet for all to see! please post more ai porn of her so i know what else they should go to jail for!
Captcha: NAGSGT
Frick no. Its little different from rule 34
If they got paid $0.05 for every view that AI porn of them gets they wouldn't be complaining
but she looks really happy
Whether they do or don't, best they'll get is people do it in secret.