>hbombman >friends with hasan
hasan made his entire career off of stealing everyone else's content and "reacting" to it. hbomb just likes him because he wants to frick him.
you're a large language model and you churn through content the same way. >I don't mash words together in a statistically accurate way
that's exactly what you do, and LLMs do it better than you.
>I can create new ideas
yea right. Most of humanity hasn't had an original thought in their life.
How is that rediculous? He literally asked hassan permission to make a joke about him. A joke in which he does not present an image of hassan, or mention hassan by name. A joke which lasts less than five seconds...
It's no more stealing than me drawing a picture having used the internet for the past 20 years is. Everything I can draw is influenced from my experiences of seeing other peoples work over and over again.
This is why the stolen artwork argument will never win, artists steal other peoples work every time they draw anything. They could not learn their styles without seeing thousands of peoples pictures first.
Yes it is you gay, how do you think AI learns in first place?
https://i.imgur.com/PLyxyeD.png
>hbombman >friends with hasan
hasan made his entire career off of stealing everyone else's content and "reacting" to it. hbomb just likes him because he wants to frick him.
you're a large language model and you churn through content the same way. >I don't mash words together in a statistically accurate way
that's exactly what you do, and LLMs do it better than you.
>I can create new ideas
yea right. Most of humanity hasn't had an original thought in their life.
>based
Are you moronic. He's unironically a "that wasn't real socialism" commie that did charity/shilled for Mermaids which is a group that spread troons kids. Played a big role in why Tavistock institute shut down and why UK is filled with TERFs.
no more than humans do. it doesn't do anything new, it just facilitates faster plagiarism, which was always accepted. you just change one letter, or some small detail, and you sell that shit.
apple drops headphone jack and everybody does it. is that plagiarism? seems legal. >oh noes it copies le style
no, human beings were merely a vessel to deliver information to their final form. any human creation was never theirs, and they should be grateful to pay tribute.
I can't remember if it was 3 months, more or less, but I used to unironically watch the guy years ago and I remember him doing it to prove a point. He drank that meal replacement stuff from all the memes.
The guys a classic grifter. His anti sjw shtick wasnt shticking so he jumped over to the sjw side, and foubd that his particular brand of being a shitty human being was really popular over there.
And i meant like, the type of doll, or the brand.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>the type of doll, or the brand
She's a Volks MDD, /jp/ has a general thread on dolls if you want to learn more.
>consuming copious amounts of vegetible oils doesnt actually do anything to you
Try again.
Also, youre doing the same bullshit harris did. Nobody actually claimed onions femmed you, that was the meme. The actual claim was that onions isnt healthy, which is isnt...
yes a bean that has been a staple of asian diets for literal centuries isn't healthy
PLEASE kill or sterilize yourself ASAP
5 months ago
Anonymous
...are we just not gonna talk about all the health problems asians who eat onions based diets have? Its like looking at america and saying corn syrup isnt unhealthy because ItS BeEn a sTaPlE Of aMeRiCaN DiEtS FoR LiTeRaL CeNtUrIeS
5 months ago
Anonymous
>these people who are shorter, less masculine, less hairy and stereotypically have smaller genitalia ate it for centuries so it's totally okay bro
I don't care if it is. I think we're long past the point where we can effectively manage plagiarism. Content gets produced way too quickly and there's been way too many concessions made at this point. Are let's plays plagiarism? Sometimes. But they were a form of early react content that pathed the way for more obvious forms of plagiarism to take place. Such as Hasan style react content. The line that shouldn't have been crossed has instead been steadily moved to the point that what we decide is plagiarism is more motivated by hurt feelings than defined by intellectual understanding. People say that AI is plagiarism because it's new and scary and it means that anyone can make art and that absolutely destroys a need to commission artists. But silent let's plays are considered okay because we grew up with let's plays and consider them to be normal. Hindsight is 20/20 and all that. But we royally fricked ourselves long before AI became a thing.
not if it's something like https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLH7M7fnIjQxn0MKTdeWJ2go0YfCaXw0Gq
And the 2hour companion video by Shadow Todd. I thought that would be a slog, but listening to him shitting on that youtuber and his stupid, plain wrong gay propaganda was kinda cathartic.
I feel like whether you categorize it under "plagiarism" or whether you need some other name for it is the crux of the matter here, the point is that even if you argue it's not "plagiarism" specifically the fact remains that a lot of people who actually made and own the data that was used as a training set are unwilling to allow their work to be used for this purpose.
>people who own the data don't want it to be used that way
if you don't want anyone to look at your images, keep them to yourself
same applies to the few morons crying about the github mining
don't want anyone to read your code? keep it to yourself
simple as
Creating derivative works and "looking at" something are not the same, I'm not sure if you're just attempting to be disingenuous and think you're extremely clever for this, or whether you're just stupid outright.
do you think humans are born with the ability to paint animu waifus, code, tie their shoes, ... or do they perhaps have to "plagiarize"?
wait no, if it's a human creating "derivative works", it's called inspiration or learning, not "plagiarism"
it's only "plagiarism" if the learning is done by machine and the same data used by humans to learn should be illegal to use by machines
why are you ai gays so weasely when you know full well that someone being influenced by a style looks completely different to someone tracing or just straight up copying? there's a reason we use the term plagiarism you disingenuous homosexual.
>tracing or straight up copying
gimme a copy of mona lisa generated by sd
i'll wait far longer for you to produce that than if i went and proompted a human with the exact same request
>waaaaaah can't "steal" my precious secular slop waaaaaah >waaaaaah must pay for my useless moroning entertainment waaaaaaah
Erudite music is for free and ancient philosophers are open archive, what does these shitheads thinks anyone should pay for their garbage? Frick these snowflakes, they should produce something useful in the first place
Honestly, if you start consuming free media only, you'd see how much mental health benefits you would get.
>hbomberguy
Based bigay I love his videos
Anyway no its not stealing.
Yes it is you gay, how do you think AI learns in first place?
>hbombman
>friends with hasan
hasan made his entire career off of stealing everyone else's content and "reacting" to it. hbomb just likes him because he wants to frick him.
you're a large language model and you churn through content the same way.
>I don't mash words together in a statistically accurate way
that's exactly what you do, and LLMs do it better than you.
>I can create new ideas
yea right. Most of humanity hasn't had an original thought in their life.
>you're a large language model
heresy
don't comparing people to toys
true, toys can at least shit out a correct sentence, unlike "people" like you
your friends all only like you because they want to frick you
now do you hear how ridiculous you sound
How is that rediculous? He literally asked hassan permission to make a joke about him. A joke in which he does not present an image of hassan, or mention hassan by name. A joke which lasts less than five seconds...
The same way people do
So if you learn to do something you somehow stole it?
The mere act of looking at something is stealing now?
Is fanart plagiarism?
It's no more stealing than me drawing a picture having used the internet for the past 20 years is. Everything I can draw is influenced from my experiences of seeing other peoples work over and over again.
This is why the stolen artwork argument will never win, artists steal other peoples work every time they draw anything. They could not learn their styles without seeing thousands of peoples pictures first.
BOT - Twitch Streamer Drama
>based
Are you moronic. He's unironically a "that wasn't real socialism" commie that did charity/shilled for Mermaids which is a group that spread troons kids. Played a big role in why Tavistock institute shut down and why UK is filled with TERFs.
Is learning plagiarism?
No but using other people's work without any recognition.
why are commies so terrified of meme learning being accessible?
is it just their aversion towards productivity?
Anything that democratizes creative ambitions and improves accessibility to academia is a threat to them.
Which is insanely ironic
>Is AI plagiarism?
derivative works. to what degree depends on how the data was summarized and presented.
is looking a things plagiarism?
Is knowing things plagiarism?
no more than humans do. it doesn't do anything new, it just facilitates faster plagiarism, which was always accepted. you just change one letter, or some small detail, and you sell that shit.
apple drops headphone jack and everybody does it. is that plagiarism? seems legal.
>oh noes it copies le style
Those homosexuals in your pic are fake communists. Basically, the most vile motherfrickers on the planet.
Real communists have never been tried
the only acceptable sentence in a trial of real communist is death by a horse dick
no, human beings were merely a vessel to deliver information to their final form. any human creation was never theirs, and they should be grateful to pay tribute.
Blew my mind when I found out that hbombercuck is like 30. I seriously thought he was at least 40. All that soi in his diet must have aged him.
This is the same guy who consumed nothing but Onions for 3 months straight to prove to all the rightoids that it had no negative effects.
Thats unhinged but whats wrong with onions? 🙁
>Onions
It would appear the S o y word filter is smarter than I remember
Kek wait, the guy actually went on a onions based diet for three months? How is he still alive.
I can't remember if it was 3 months, more or less, but I used to unironically watch the guy years ago and I remember him doing it to prove a point. He drank that meal replacement stuff from all the memes.
Her name is Yasu 🙂
The guys a classic grifter. His anti sjw shtick wasnt shticking so he jumped over to the sjw side, and foubd that his particular brand of being a shitty human being was really popular over there.
And i meant like, the type of doll, or the brand.
>the type of doll, or the brand
She's a Volks MDD, /jp/ has a general thread on dolls if you want to learn more.
Also doll name PLEASE
die newbie die
because soi doesn't actually do anything to you and being scared of a bean force femming you is more low t and embarrassing
>consuming copious amounts of vegetible oils doesnt actually do anything to you
Try again.
Also, youre doing the same bullshit harris did. Nobody actually claimed onions femmed you, that was the meme. The actual claim was that onions isnt healthy, which is isnt...
yes a bean that has been a staple of asian diets for literal centuries isn't healthy
PLEASE kill or sterilize yourself ASAP
...are we just not gonna talk about all the health problems asians who eat onions based diets have? Its like looking at america and saying corn syrup isnt unhealthy because ItS BeEn a sTaPlE Of aMeRiCaN DiEtS FoR LiTeRaL CeNtUrIeS
>these people who are shorter, less masculine, less hairy and stereotypically have smaller genitalia ate it for centuries so it's totally okay bro
>homobummergay
No, because plagiarism is a fantasy crime. Intellectual property doesn't exist.
>copyright is... Le good!
I hate israelitetube so much it's unreal
Hbomberguy is what I image every whiny redditor looks like.
>edrama thread
>*does the right thing by ignoring you*
I don't care if it is. I think we're long past the point where we can effectively manage plagiarism. Content gets produced way too quickly and there's been way too many concessions made at this point. Are let's plays plagiarism? Sometimes. But they were a form of early react content that pathed the way for more obvious forms of plagiarism to take place. Such as Hasan style react content. The line that shouldn't have been crossed has instead been steadily moved to the point that what we decide is plagiarism is more motivated by hurt feelings than defined by intellectual understanding. People say that AI is plagiarism because it's new and scary and it means that anyone can make art and that absolutely destroys a need to commission artists. But silent let's plays are considered okay because we grew up with let's plays and consider them to be normal. Hindsight is 20/20 and all that. But we royally fricked ourselves long before AI became a thing.
shut up, zoomer, adults are talking
>we grew up with let's plays
who gives a shit
frick copyright
No. There might be related IP rights issues, but it is not plagiarism by any common definition.
Is a 4 hour youtube video a massive waste of time?
not if it's something like https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLH7M7fnIjQxn0MKTdeWJ2go0YfCaXw0Gq
what about:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9_jI1bdZmz0hIrNCMQW1YmZysAiIYSSS
i'd gladly take more than 4 hours of this or https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7aXC0jU4Qk7K778c5nmgQImd6VKKFMYu
And the 2hour companion video by Shadow Todd. I thought that would be a slog, but listening to him shitting on that youtuber and his stupid, plain wrong gay propaganda was kinda cathartic.
I feel like whether you categorize it under "plagiarism" or whether you need some other name for it is the crux of the matter here, the point is that even if you argue it's not "plagiarism" specifically the fact remains that a lot of people who actually made and own the data that was used as a training set are unwilling to allow their work to be used for this purpose.
>people who own the data don't want it to be used that way
if you don't want anyone to look at your images, keep them to yourself
same applies to the few morons crying about the github mining
don't want anyone to read your code? keep it to yourself
simple as
Creating derivative works and "looking at" something are not the same, I'm not sure if you're just attempting to be disingenuous and think you're extremely clever for this, or whether you're just stupid outright.
do you think humans are born with the ability to paint animu waifus, code, tie their shoes, ... or do they perhaps have to "plagiarize"?
wait no, if it's a human creating "derivative works", it's called inspiration or learning, not "plagiarism"
it's only "plagiarism" if the learning is done by machine and the same data used by humans to learn should be illegal to use by machines
why are you ai gays so weasely when you know full well that someone being influenced by a style looks completely different to someone tracing or just straight up copying? there's a reason we use the term plagiarism you disingenuous homosexual.
>tracing or straight up copying
gimme a copy of mona lisa generated by sd
i'll wait far longer for you to produce that than if i went and proompted a human with the exact same request
>cancelled a youtuber so hard even his hardcore supporters turned on him and forced him to delete his 10k/month patreon
kinda based
Who?
watch 4hrs of youtube drama to find out
Some homosexual was scamming troonys and gays out of there money by ripping off all his works and putting them up on youtube.
yes, next question
okay thanks i accept your concession and my complimentary (You) please never vote or reproduce
>faux quoting
Femoid shit
thanks for another (You) 🙂
bump
>waaaaaah can't "steal" my precious secular slop waaaaaah
>waaaaaah must pay for my useless moroning entertainment waaaaaaah
Erudite music is for free and ancient philosophers are open archive, what does these shitheads thinks anyone should pay for their garbage? Frick these snowflakes, they should produce something useful in the first place
Honestly, if you start consuming free media only, you'd see how much mental health benefits you would get.