ask it to write a novel game idea
it cant
i was blown away by it at first but after using chatgpt for a while inrealize it’s extremely limited in ways that wont be easy to fix
it is very good at ripping existing information but cannot think for itself AT ALL. If you ask it, “what is heavier a pound of bricks or 2 pounds of feathers”, it is adamant that they are the same weight. Thats because it finds the normal version of that question online and cannot adjust its logic from 1 -> 2
99% of jobs, there will always be geniuses that AI isn't able to replace and there will always be a need to maintain shit that's too rare/costly to create a robot for.
Did the steam engine "ruined" a lot of jobs? Yes it did. But we could never have the lifestyle that we have today without it. The current AI is like the early puttering steam engines. Eventually we will get the AI equivalent of ICE and nuclear reactors.
>But we could never have the lifestyle that we have today without it
Depression, hyper sexuality, extreme amounts of drug use (both prescription and illegal), and all sorts of other shit to cope with how shit society is today?
No, being financially independent and working on your hobbies/playing videogames all day with no other worries is the optimal life.
All the other things you've described is stuff that working for money causes.
Then the vast majority of people in the west are low tier financial independence, which means your idea of financial independence is a fricking meme.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Then the vast majority of people in the west are low tier financial independence,
That's true, but that's not the fault of technology; that's the fault of the oligarchy.
People before the steam engine era would unironically be better off because the ones who weren't just died of debilitating sickness.
10 months ago
Anonymous
It's the society the technology allowed. Back then if the king was too much of a c**t you cut his head off, nowadays governance is so decentralized (something technology enabled) that you'd need a full scale war to overthrow the c**t and his c**t ideas.
>the majority of people
You mean white Americans with no family. White Americans with family can fall back on that. Black Americans can just live off state programs. People in Canada/Europe/Aus/NZ can just live off the state. White Americans with no family are the only western demographic living precariously. Everyone else has safety nets.
I mean, maybe eventually?
In the same way you could be some weaving guilder in 1870 asking if machines are going to ruin literally every job, and eventually you'd be right. Because AI needs to run on machines. But the luddite would be missing century or two of important development and transitions.
Will the current round of "generative AI" have impact on a good chunk of the current jobs? Yep.
this dumb frick pigeon game is written online
that's why chat gpt is just copy and pasting it
im surprised he got found out so fast, damn bot anons are something else
his ears are augmented
Yes, but only useless jobs (90% of capitalist society)
ask it to write a novel game idea
it cant
i was blown away by it at first but after using chatgpt for a while inrealize it’s extremely limited in ways that wont be easy to fix
it is very good at ripping existing information but cannot think for itself AT ALL. If you ask it, “what is heavier a pound of bricks or 2 pounds of feathers”, it is adamant that they are the same weight. Thats because it finds the normal version of that question online and cannot adjust its logic from 1 -> 2
Ask a human to do the same thing, they can't either. Chat-GPT isn't meant to surpass humans, just replace them in most cases
99% of jobs, there will always be geniuses that AI isn't able to replace and there will always be a need to maintain shit that's too rare/costly to create a robot for.
Yes, literally every individual job will be entirely taken by AI, with the sole exception of Human Resources.
Did the steam engine "ruined" a lot of jobs? Yes it did. But we could never have the lifestyle that we have today without it. The current AI is like the early puttering steam engines. Eventually we will get the AI equivalent of ICE and nuclear reactors.
>But we could never have the lifestyle that we have today without it
Depression, hyper sexuality, extreme amounts of drug use (both prescription and illegal), and all sorts of other shit to cope with how shit society is today?
No, being financially independent and working on your hobbies/playing videogames all day with no other worries is the optimal life.
All the other things you've described is stuff that working for money causes.
Ah yes, that financial independence where the majority of people are one small crisis away from not being able to pay their rent.
I would call that low tier financial independence. Strive for high tier independence that has a large nest egg for setbacks like that.
Then the vast majority of people in the west are low tier financial independence, which means your idea of financial independence is a fricking meme.
>Then the vast majority of people in the west are low tier financial independence,
That's true, but that's not the fault of technology; that's the fault of the oligarchy.
People before the steam engine era would unironically be better off because the ones who weren't just died of debilitating sickness.
It's the society the technology allowed. Back then if the king was too much of a c**t you cut his head off, nowadays governance is so decentralized (something technology enabled) that you'd need a full scale war to overthrow the c**t and his c**t ideas.
>the majority of people
You mean white Americans with no family. White Americans with family can fall back on that. Black Americans can just live off state programs. People in Canada/Europe/Aus/NZ can just live off the state. White Americans with no family are the only western demographic living precariously. Everyone else has safety nets.
Racist. A low income single black person with no kids doesn't get any more benefits than a low income single white person with no kids.
Well it can't do a worse job than Blizzard these days.
I mean, maybe eventually?
In the same way you could be some weaving guilder in 1870 asking if machines are going to ruin literally every job, and eventually you'd be right. Because AI needs to run on machines. But the luddite would be missing century or two of important development and transitions.
Will the current round of "generative AI" have impact on a good chunk of the current jobs? Yep.
Squeeze him harder.
no. that will be the chinese