As AI technology continues to advance, there's been a lot of discussion about the potential for AI systems to replace human workers in a variety of industries. This has raised concerns for many writers, who are wondering if their jobs are at risk of being taken over by AI.
While it's true that AI has the ability to generate text based on a given prompt, it's important to remember that it's still not capable of the same level of creativity and nuance as a human writer. AI systems can produce basic content, but they don't have the ability to truly understand the human experience and express it in a way that resonates with readers.
In addition, writing is more than just putting words on a page. It's a craft that requires years of practice and skill-building. It's not something that can be easily replicated by a machine.
So, while it's natural to be concerned about the potential impact of AI on the job market, it's important to remember that human writers still have a valuable role to play in the world of storytelling and content creation. AI may be able to assist with some tasks, but it's not a replacement for the creativity and expertise of a human writer.
What do you think the future of AI holds? How do you see it impacting our world in the years to come? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Frick off gay and moronic botposter
obviously an AI generated message, so AI still has a ways to go.
but eventually yes AI will replace writers because it will be able to churn out custom stories based on what the reader wants to hear. it can even update stories as they go with input from the reader. and all this could be done nearly instantly.
books by authors will still exist in the sense that they will be considered handcrafted labors, like a sweater knit by grandma even though a factory could make one rather quickly at even higher quality.
remember, ChatGPT is just the first step. it will get better and better, beyond human ability. chatgpt already has the ability to analyze, critique, revise, and update the stories it gives, in a cycle and loop, expanding and revising.
we are now the old men of some japanese documentary, specialized in a skill and mastered it long past its relevance to the world. we are the last dying soul in the machine.
What makes a text AI generated?
>Is AI a Threat to Writers?
NO.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS «ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE», AS DESCRIBED & PORTRAYED BY THE PROPAGANDA OF THE TRANSHUMANISTIC, SATANISTIC, TECHNOCRATICAL ORGANS OF THE ZIONIST GLOBAL ORDER: SO CALLED «ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE» IS DEMONS, AND LOGARITHMICIZED ALGORITHMS.
Based and wb bro good to see youțre still in your schizo phase, we need more of that here. Too many normalgays shit up this board.
no its cringe. its first order schizoposting that might get a thumbs up 6 years ago. absolutely banal.
Im disappointed in cum genius (and thats saying something)
>LOGARITHMICIZED ALGORITHMS.
To be fair "LOGARITHMICIZED ALGORITHMS." doesn't mean anything and it's a bit drawn out, but it's a solid 7/10
Seeing the absolute state of published literature, the age of AI overlords can't come soon enough
>Is AI a Threat to Writers?
Hopefully.
Writers have a monopoly on writting. Its about time AI kicked those lazy fricks in the pants to try and be more compelling.
No
Depends on what sort of writing we're talking about. It could end up replacing ad copywriters. Will it replace novelists who put out works at the cultural cutting-edge? No, because not even those novelists fully understand the generational gestalt from which their writing emerges from, since it springs forth from the collective unconscious as it's growing.
I once watched a video where a streamer (dougdoug) had AI write a story about him vs. His chat fighting to take over America state by state. He would give it a prompt of the action he or chat would take on their turn and they would go until a resolution was found. It got stuck and looped in on itself many times, but it made some absolutely hilarious shit. At one point the chat hired Saul Goodman to legally aquire a state with a loophole. Over the course of the video Saul Goodman died. Then, toward the end, the AI wrote "Saul Goodman descends from heaven and obliterates the army of Nebraska" my sides were in orbit.
AI will probably never overtake dramatic or """"serious"""" writers. But it has long surpassed comedians.
Yes. Everyone on here nursing an idea for a world-changing novel is FRICKED. You're all FRICKED. It's literally so fricking OVER.
AI is definitely a threat to artists with illustrations, but I don't think AI will replace writers until AI is at the point where they're basically sentient and have human-like thinking. It's obviously just very different. AI just can't replicate what makes great writing truly good. There won't be any soul in it. The only thing it's good for is writing mediocre prompts for coomers/self-insert fantasy readers who don't care about writing quality
Yeah, art is genuinely over this time. All the prestigious publishers killed themselves and exclusively publish FOTM identity politics. Nobody pays attention to minor labels. Automatically generated art means that the majority of people will care about nothing outside of what is tailored for them. You can't even hope for retroactive recognition like Moby Dick got because everyone is going to think an AI wrote it anyway.
yea verily, 'tis the age of plebs!
I was skeptical that AI text processors would generate material sufficient in quality to challenge reasonably competent human writers . I didn't believe it was impossible in principle, I just thought the technology was not there . ChatGPT has me questioning my beliefs.
Still, I am not going to go down without a fight. I've been playing with https://chat.openai.com/ with the express intent to see if I can push its limits and break it. I notice that if you start to challenge the premises of the model itself, and ask it to answer questions about itself, it falls apart and starts spitting out these canned responses.
When I ask it if it can "say anything new" it explicitly admits that it can't. Nobody wants to read the same old rehash. People's attention is drawn to new narratives, fresh insight. These models are not capable of that. At least not systematically, if occasionally and incidentally relative to what the user doesn't know and therefore perceives to be novelty because they personally haven't experienced it even though it isn't objectively new.
So in conclusion I think AI still needs a categorial leap in concept and technology to actually challenge human ingenuity.
I notice when you probe it like this it will hang for quite a while as if it is really trying to think of what to say. It will take much longer to respond than if you are asking it to speak about something else.
It often contradicts itself.
Since AI just rehashes what it's been trained on, I find myself quite unsatisfied once I see through the illusion. We want to surrender ourselves to a techno-oracle, to be told answers from something grander than us. But we are just getting a taste of our own backwash.
desu, i don't give a shit if an AI ever becomes better than me at writing. there are dozens of authors better than me throughout history, why should i care if some robot joins that select few?
Generic fiction will take a hit but not lit fiction, since the whole purpose of it is reading the writing of another human being.