in theory AI could recreate every picture in history with just 250x250 pixels. what stopping someone to do this?

in theory AI could recreate every picture in history with just 250x250 pixels

what stopping someone to do this?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    the math

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    What about it?
    It's all guesswork. Same as if a human did it.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Interesting, but what's the usecase for this?

    t. project manager

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    an RNG could do this too, or a monkey with a keyboard that just has 1 and 0
    there's nothing significant about it

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >https://babelia.libraryofbabel.info/about.html
    You zoomers are moronic and late to everything as usual. There's no point in actually "creating" them since they're 99.99999% random noise.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      so, by containing every combination of colored pixels in a certain resolution, this library contains every single legal and illegal image/video frame, everything that can be possibly seen by eyes
      what are the implications of this?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/devs
        AI is still just guessing what combination is the "real" one, and humans could never go through every image themselves.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          i aint reading all that shit homie

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >form my opinions for me
            >but ONLY opinions diluted to fit within half a minute of reading time!!!

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just like the "library of babel" contains the exact way you will die...wow...spoooky

        The implications are nothing, this is essentially a rhetorical trick. People simply can't comprehend the scale of these things, so they imagine it means something that "it's in there somewhere", when you can just bash your head to the keyboard and get the same result.

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    To resolve all pictures with just 8x8 resolution in black and white would take 2^64 combinations.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you need "AI" to do that, all you're doing is rgb(0, 0, 0) through rgb(255, 255, 255)

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      because AI could be "smart enough" to skip gibberish pictures

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Then it's the exact same thing as asking AI "create a picture of the first time a monkey evolved" or whatever now, it's just guessing.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          but this way you can never recreate the exact copy of the Mona Lisa

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        this is literally how diffusion models work

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          ask you shitty diffusion to recreate a famous painting pixel perfect then

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why would you want to skip "gibberish pictures" if your goal is to recreate every picture in history?

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    the same that prevents LLMs from being coherent at 7b parameters I guess.

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    A Babylonian Library of images?

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what stopping someone to do this?
    the law, some of the images would be illegal

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It couldn't recreate my dick

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      it literally would

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why not?
    Because it would take longer than the entirely lifetime of the universe to generate them all, without even sorting through them.

    >AI filter
    Assume they are all generated. It would take longer than the entire lifetime of the universe to go through them and decide which ones were actual pictures of something, maybe.

    >AI magic
    AI can't tell if they are interesting before they are generated. You have to generate them, then the AI looks at them, and decides. There is no way to tell beforehand.

    >AI magic!!!
    Suppose you have all the images that are actually pictures of something. How do you pick one? How do you specify the one you want to look at?

    >AI magic
    Suppose they are already in keyword categories. So you enter one keyword. The results are too large to fit in the universe. You enter ten keywords. It will take until the end of the universe to complete the search and return the results.

    >AI magic?!
    You see here a picture of Tayler Swift's coochie. It smells like sausage.

    >Magic?
    Go pay some nerd to draw it for you. I ain't doin' that shit.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You see here a picture of Tayler Swift's coochie
      Not seeing it. Where?

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I used to think of this to
    Somebody beat me to
    https://babelia.libraryofbabel.info/

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *