Earlier this year most people were predicting in less than 5 years you would be able to create entire films from scratch giving details and who you want in the video doing what.
The EU already made a law banning many apps to nudify women. AI using faces of famous actresses will be banned too. And is right that it is banned because it's not right. Would you like to see your daughter naked on the internet?
the only female that is important in my life and ever will be important is my mother, and shes too old for anyone to want to make ai porn of her. So for me, theres really no downside. I can finally take what I am owed from these prostitutes.
Don't post pictures on the internet if you don't want people using them for weird shit. This was like the number one rule of the internet back in the day. Never give out your info, never post your picture, but normies are moronic and can't follow those basic rules.
That is living in the past. It is already being banned and it will be punishable.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Who the frick cares every other country that understands the world won't ban it. EU and Australia have always been massive frick heads when it comes to banning stuff but it won't happen in the US or the million other countries who don't give a frick. The ban means nothing and AI marches on.
>Would you like to see your daughter naked on the internet?
Technically if it's AI then there have been creative liberties taken and that would fall under fair use. It's the same with political cartoons. Besides, why would I need to look at fake nudes of my daughter when I can see her naked whenever I want? Food for thought. [Spoiler]This is a joke.[/Spoiler]
Taking a photo of a girl from her Facebook and ten make her look naked isn't the same as making a cartoon. And AI is so realistic that it can't be considered a cartoon either. The same with pedocartoons that shouldn't be allowed either, it's sick and its wrong. You already have thousands of porn actresses and models and actresses getting naked when they want to jerk off.
>You already have thousands of porn actresses and models and actresses getting naked when they want to jerk off.
should we make that a crime? >the charges, officer?
you were caught jerking off to a picture
No, because those women get naked or have sex in front of the cameras because they want to do it.
If the police break into your house and they found photos of minors naked you will be in trouble. The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
No matter what you say, you deep down know it''s wrong.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
can't i just use photoshop to do that already? can't i also just paint or make sculptures if i were so inclined? should all of that be against the law too? or is it only a crime if the picture looked real? at what point do you start hauling people to jail for jerking off to a picture? how much jail time should they receive for such a heinous crime? a month? a year? at what point do you realize that punishing people for looking at pictures is incredibly silly
5 months ago
Anonymous
The question is simple, imagine that you are a woman and you make videos on YouTube about cooking for example, would you like to see fakes of yourself naked and fricking being shared on the internet?, is that right?
>The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
If I spend 15 seconds poorly copying Kamala Harris' head onto a naked body of another woman on MS Paint should I got to jail?
What if I draw a stick figure with boobs and copy her head onto it? Do I still go to jail? Where is the line?
That can't be compared with AI so your question makes no sense.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Then if I stuck an AI Kamala Harris onto a different AI woman would it be a crime?
What if I prompted the AI to make Kamala Harris into godzilla with breasts? Would I be arrested in Japan or America?
5 months ago
Anonymous
do you think fake pictures = criminal activity yes or no. just disliking it doesn't matter. do you think it should be an actual crime. i dont, and i think its really silly to try to criminalize fake pctures, especially in an era where ai is going to be everywhere and in everything. it feels so childish to not realize we have entered a new era in history and then try to actually criminalize it of all things. that's like trying to throw a pebble at a tank. what are you really even accomplishing at the end of the day
5 months ago
Anonymous
>The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
If I spend 15 seconds poorly copying Kamala Harris' head onto a naked body of another woman on MS Paint should I got to jail?
What if I draw a stick figure with boobs and copy her head onto it? Do I still go to jail? Where is the line?
The EU already made a law banning many apps to nudify women. AI using faces of famous actresses will be banned too. And is right that it is banned because it's not right. Would you like to see your daughter naked on the internet?
You maybe get an idea of the bone-chilling fear some women may feel about something like this. AI's the worst it's ever going to be at this very instant, and we're not far from being able to generate someone doing anything with just a photo.
What are women supposed to do then? Never take a picture and put it on the internet ever again? What of the ones that exist? Can they never take a picture with family at a dinner or family gatherings? What's to stop someone from doing doing it to their kids?
It's a fricking nightmare, and the fact tech bros can't help but stomp on the accelerator because of profit makes me fearful of the opsec levels of security I'm going to have to practice to maintain ownership of myself in the next few years.
>What are women supposed to do then? Never take a picture and put it on the internet ever again?
Yes. I know women are too narcissistic to understand, but you do NOT have to post on the internet for attention. Your photo with your family is a valuable memory and keepsake even if you don't show the whole entire world for approval.
Think about who will be most affected by this...Celebrities....Everything they do is in public. Imagine the amount of data on Taylor Swift, right from looks,mannerisms to voice, soon you could literally make a Blader Runner type JOI of Taylor Swift as your personal assistant. Karma is a full circle, the real rich will be those who are private and still have money
I have hundreds of images of nudes of all my crushes atm . Im upgrading my ram and gpu as well so I can run animation AI algorithm where I can live in coomer paradise .
assuming it will continue to develop over at the same rate for five years isn't realistic, technology usually has rapid bursts and then slow incremental improvement
>impossible to tell what nudes are AI >can tell future bfs that those nudes of mine that are circling are online were just some depraved stalker making AI
If I can't generate fantasy nudes through AI then what CAN I do??
But, we probably underestimate how big of a threat this is to the bug governments. Imagine if men didn't have to pay for access to porn or onlyf or female streamers etc. Sex is a huge industry. They will never ever allow you to have a nude farm running locally on your PC.
>Sex is a huge industry. They will never ever allow you to have a nude farm running locally on your PC.
AI porn is still porn either way the shadow puppets profiteering from general porno won't lose any sleep, they make billions annually from other investments ad revenue isn't a big deal. Since they want a lost generation of young men hooked to porn of any kind to mold personality and motives it'll be the same result, but you did make a valid point
I think it's funny that historically human beings invent things, other human beings use those things in a way that ultimately lowers the average quality of behavior in society, and then people just don't give a shit
The people who are putting so much into making AI genuinely don't seem to care that it has been proven time and time again that the technology will likely be used by the richest people in the world to increase their ability to control all other groups
Pretty funny shit
If you ask me, a person has to be stupid to be invested in society beyond simply being able to function in it enough to be comfortable.
Women freak the frick out about AI because their sexual value is the only thing meaningful about them. Guys don't care because they have value outside of being a sex object.
I'd like to say you're right, that AI will put LonelyFans out of business and roastoids will have to try something new. However, it was never about the looks to these guys; OF paypiggies want the connection, to be the knight to a queen.
you can still edit photos with photoshop, or even make your own erotic art. you may even ban ai images for 100 years, but eventually it will all seem so silly to care what anyone does with pictures.
Earlier this year most people were predicting in less than 5 years you would be able to create entire films from scratch giving details and who you want in the video doing what.
I was predicting that in 2012 and got locked up for being a crazy person. I hate normalhomosexuals.
I've heard within a year a full length AI movie
It will probably be made a crime akin to CP.
This
If you think that this will be allowed....
The EU already made a law banning many apps to nudify women. AI using faces of famous actresses will be banned too. And is right that it is banned because it's not right. Would you like to see your daughter naked on the internet?
the only female that is important in my life and ever will be important is my mother, and shes too old for anyone to want to make ai porn of her. So for me, theres really no downside. I can finally take what I am owed from these prostitutes.
laws never stopped anyone
The fear of ending in jail does.
do you seriously think thats going to stop anyone? if that was true thered be no crime at all
Most fathers would prefer their daughters not to be prostitutes but they are regardless. So your question is pointless.
So taking a photo from a girl that she took with her friends and making her naked is something right in your opinion?
Don't post pictures on the internet if you don't want people using them for weird shit. This was like the number one rule of the internet back in the day. Never give out your info, never post your picture, but normies are moronic and can't follow those basic rules.
That is living in the past. It is already being banned and it will be punishable.
Who the frick cares every other country that understands the world won't ban it. EU and Australia have always been massive frick heads when it comes to banning stuff but it won't happen in the US or the million other countries who don't give a frick. The ban means nothing and AI marches on.
>Would you like to see your daughter naked on the internet?
Technically if it's AI then there have been creative liberties taken and that would fall under fair use. It's the same with political cartoons. Besides, why would I need to look at fake nudes of my daughter when I can see her naked whenever I want? Food for thought. [Spoiler]This is a joke.[/Spoiler]
Taking a photo of a girl from her Facebook and ten make her look naked isn't the same as making a cartoon. And AI is so realistic that it can't be considered a cartoon either. The same with pedocartoons that shouldn't be allowed either, it's sick and its wrong. You already have thousands of porn actresses and models and actresses getting naked when they want to jerk off.
>You already have thousands of porn actresses and models and actresses getting naked when they want to jerk off.
should we make that a crime?
>the charges, officer?
you were caught jerking off to a picture
No, because those women get naked or have sex in front of the cameras because they want to do it.
If the police break into your house and they found photos of minors naked you will be in trouble. The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
No matter what you say, you deep down know it''s wrong.
>The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
can't i just use photoshop to do that already? can't i also just paint or make sculptures if i were so inclined? should all of that be against the law too? or is it only a crime if the picture looked real? at what point do you start hauling people to jail for jerking off to a picture? how much jail time should they receive for such a heinous crime? a month? a year? at what point do you realize that punishing people for looking at pictures is incredibly silly
The question is simple, imagine that you are a woman and you make videos on YouTube about cooking for example, would you like to see fakes of yourself naked and fricking being shared on the internet?, is that right?
That can't be compared with AI so your question makes no sense.
Then if I stuck an AI Kamala Harris onto a different AI woman would it be a crime?
What if I prompted the AI to make Kamala Harris into godzilla with breasts? Would I be arrested in Japan or America?
do you think fake pictures = criminal activity yes or no. just disliking it doesn't matter. do you think it should be an actual crime. i dont, and i think its really silly to try to criminalize fake pctures, especially in an era where ai is going to be everywhere and in everything. it feels so childish to not realize we have entered a new era in history and then try to actually criminalize it of all things. that's like trying to throw a pebble at a tank. what are you really even accomplishing at the end of the day
>The same should be with taking photos of girls from the internet and making them nude.
If I spend 15 seconds poorly copying Kamala Harris' head onto a naked body of another woman on MS Paint should I got to jail?
What if I draw a stick figure with boobs and copy her head onto it? Do I still go to jail? Where is the line?
>The EU says
And thats why your whole argument falla flat
The absolutely cucked EU is trying to ruin AI for everyone. They can go frick themselves.
You maybe get an idea of the bone-chilling fear some women may feel about something like this. AI's the worst it's ever going to be at this very instant, and we're not far from being able to generate someone doing anything with just a photo.
What are women supposed to do then? Never take a picture and put it on the internet ever again? What of the ones that exist? Can they never take a picture with family at a dinner or family gatherings? What's to stop someone from doing doing it to their kids?
It's a fricking nightmare, and the fact tech bros can't help but stomp on the accelerator because of profit makes me fearful of the opsec levels of security I'm going to have to practice to maintain ownership of myself in the next few years.
>What are women supposed to do then? Never take a picture and put it on the internet ever again?
Yes. I know women are too narcissistic to understand, but you do NOT have to post on the internet for attention. Your photo with your family is a valuable memory and keepsake even if you don't show the whole entire world for approval.
Think about who will be most affected by this...Celebrities....Everything they do is in public. Imagine the amount of data on Taylor Swift, right from looks,mannerisms to voice, soon you could literally make a Blader Runner type JOI of Taylor Swift as your personal assistant. Karma is a full circle, the real rich will be those who are private and still have money
What ai did you use op?
7ur
lol i didn't actually make this, i found it in a /misc/ thread, but it looked super realistic so i downloaded it !
>Chuds still can't have sex and can only look at fake naked pictures on the internet
Sure thing, you won
>He doesn't know
Yeah, Chuds won
I have hundreds of images of nudes of all my crushes atm . Im upgrading my ram and gpu as well so I can run animation AI algorithm where I can live in coomer paradise .
The "patriarchy" will ban all that shit or normies will bully you for using it
It will be completely locked down and paywalled you won't be able to run it locally.
assuming it will continue to develop over at the same rate for five years isn't realistic, technology usually has rapid bursts and then slow incremental improvement
are you moronic? Where the frick did you pull that idea out of? Your ass? AI is very very steadily improving.
>impossible to tell what nudes are AI
>can tell future bfs that those nudes of mine that are circling are online were just some depraved stalker making AI
🙂
> she has ever been stalked
next'd
I recognize that emoticon use, troony
will be proprietary and only able to generate BBW black trans autistic women
If I can't generate fantasy nudes through AI then what CAN I do??
But, we probably underestimate how big of a threat this is to the bug governments. Imagine if men didn't have to pay for access to porn or onlyf or female streamers etc. Sex is a huge industry. They will never ever allow you to have a nude farm running locally on your PC.
>Sex is a huge industry. They will never ever allow you to have a nude farm running locally on your PC.
AI porn is still porn either way the shadow puppets profiteering from general porno won't lose any sleep, they make billions annually from other investments ad revenue isn't a big deal. Since they want a lost generation of young men hooked to porn of any kind to mold personality and motives it'll be the same result, but you did make a valid point
I think it's funny that historically human beings invent things, other human beings use those things in a way that ultimately lowers the average quality of behavior in society, and then people just don't give a shit
The people who are putting so much into making AI genuinely don't seem to care that it has been proven time and time again that the technology will likely be used by the richest people in the world to increase their ability to control all other groups
Pretty funny shit
If you ask me, a person has to be stupid to be invested in society beyond simply being able to function in it enough to be comfortable.
If someone made ai porn of me I'd be flattered, but I'm just some guy
Women freak the frick out about AI because their sexual value is the only thing meaningful about them. Guys don't care because they have value outside of being a sex object.
I'd like to say you're right, that AI will put LonelyFans out of business and roastoids will have to try something new. However, it was never about the looks to these guys; OF paypiggies want the connection, to be the knight to a queen.
you can still edit photos with photoshop, or even make your own erotic art. you may even ban ai images for 100 years, but eventually it will all seem so silly to care what anyone does with pictures.
really incredible all these started with the waifu generator